Wednesday, July 29, 2015

SYRIA'S WHATEVER ZONES

Days after the U.S. and Turkey announced a breakthrough deal to fight together against the Islamic State, U.S. officials are insisting that -- contrary to reports -- there are definitely no U.S. plans for a “safe zone” inside Syria. In fact, there really is no “zone,” and there is no plan to keep the area “safe.”

...“We’re not out there staking out zones and doing some things that I know have been discussed in years past -- no-fly zones, safe zones. What we’re trying to do is clear ISIL,” a senior administration official said. “I think it’s important not to confuse that with staking out these zones that you can identify with road signs and on big maps, and that’s just not what’s happening.”

On Monday, a White House official told an audience in a closed-door meeting at the Middle East Institute in Washington the same thing about there being no safe zone inside Syria, according to two people who were inside the meeting. The Obama administration is sending a delegation back to Turkey next week to work on exactly what the new cooperation along the northern Syria border will look like, the official said.

[source : U.S. Shoots Down Idea of Syria Safe Zone, Bloomberg, http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2015-07-28/u-s-shoots-down-idea-of-syria-safe-zone, 28th July 2015]

Yeah. Whatever.

Whatever we want them to be they will be.

Just as long as it entices Syria to attack then we can attack them.

Lest we forget: the USA is implementing a plan for war and regime change in seven countries in five years...and that plan is waaaaaaay behind schedule.

THOUGHT FOR T'DAY ON IMMIGRATION

America is a nation of immigrants.

Some were forced immigrants, dragged over from Africa through the Middle Passage, and if they survived were to endure a lifetime in brutal servitude, that was legal and initially codified in the Constitution of the United States.

Others went to the USA in search of a new life, a promised land, and in doing so slaughtered the native Americans in their relentless expansion west. Heroes of the US Civil War, Grant and Sherman, finished off what racist, scumbag traitor Andrew Jackson started through the Trail of Tears, and either forced or tricked native Americans into reservations of ever decreasing size and resources, hundreds of miles from their ancestral grounds.

America is a nation of immigrants.

So how can Americans, or those who support the idea of America, complain about immigration?

NED PRESIDENT ATTACKS PUTIN FOR BOOTING OUT NED

Writing in The Washington Post, the President of the National Endowment for Democracy, Carl Gershman, claims that by booting the National Endowment for Democracy out of Russia Putin is displaying weakness.

Putin may claim that the National Endowment for Democracy and other nongovernmental organizations are “a threat to Russia’s basic constitutional order,” and his labeling them as dangerous enemies, along with the Russian democrats he calls “national traitors,” is his typical way of rallying political support by appealing to nationalist fears and hostilities. But it is the regime itself that has been undermining Russia’s constitutional order through repression, corruption and international aggression; and the pressures are now building toward what many in Russia believe is a major political turning point.

[source : Russia’s crackdown on civil society shows the regime’s weakness, Washington Post, https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/putins-fear-of-civil-society/2015/07/28/3d873d0a-3569-11e5-8e66-07b4603ec92a_story.html?hpid=z3, 28th July 2015]

No, Mr Gershman.

The National Endowment for Democracy is a seditious organisation. Where the NED goes, sedition goes also. The NED incites insurrection under the banner of free speech then either kills or drowns out opposing points of view. The classic example is Ukraine. Victoria Kagan-Nuland was caught discussing with the US Ambassador to Ukraine Geoffrey Pyatt who should be the next leader of Ukraine. Kagan-Nuland handpicked Arseny Yatsenyuk. But Yatsenyuk is a puppet of the NED and NATO, who packed his junta with murderous neo-Nazis, who began a war on East Ukraine to put down with extreme prejudice their anti-Nazism. And what have the Rada just done? Banned Communist parties from elections!! So much for freedom and free speech!!

Are all nations expected to kneel down before the money gods of Wall Street and The City of London, and surrender to those gods all their human and natural resources to be used in whatever manner they see fit?

The Washington Post editorial also attacks Putin for the same thing.
Mr. Putin fears competition, opposition and any cry of dissent. In pursuit of absolute power, he is suffocating his own society.

[source : Vladimir Putin is suffocating his own nation, Washington Post, https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/vladimir-putin-is-suffocating-his-own-nation/2015/07/28/3b27ae8e-3562-11e5-adf6-7227f3b7b338_story.html, 28th July 2015]
.






Tuesday, July 28, 2015

WASHINGTON POST ENCOURAGES TURKEY AND USA TO OUST ASSAD

The editorial in The Washington Post today welcomes the move for a zone in Syria to be used for whatever, but in the end couldn't resist the old Get-Assad:
What’s still missing is a coherent U.S. strategy for ending the civil war in Syria — something that will be necessary for the ultimate destruction of the Islamic State. President Obama and Secretary of State John F. Kerry have been speaking, vaguely, of new diplomatic prospects in the wake of the nuclear deal with Iran and the recent weakening of the Assad regime. But neither has offered a vision of how Iranian and Russian support for the Assads — and Iran’s deep commitment to the Hezbollah militia — could be reconciled with the imperative for a new, representative government that could unite Syrians against the Islamic State.

In fact, such an accommodation may be impossible. That’s why it’s essential that the administration commit to forging a strong Syrian alternative, both political and military, through its new collaboration with Turkey.

[source : The U.S. continues to half-step on Syria, Washington Post, 27th July 2015]

Note the title: The U.S. continues to half-step on Syria.

Throughout the summer of 2013 The Washington Post would run at least one, but frequently two, editorials per week demanding that Obama bomb the shit out of Syria, but curiously also at the same time publishing the Snowden Revelations.

The simple and plain fact is that The Washington Post, as the voice of the establishment, wants Assad out as soon as possible. This is why they welcome these zones and also encourage Obama to work with Turkey to oust Assad. They call it a "political and military Syrian alternative" but what they actually mean is war and regime change as per the plan revealed to General Wesley Clark shortly after 9/11.

War.

Regime change.

War.

Regime change.

War.

Regime change.

War.

Regime change.

TTS SICK JOKE OF THE DAY : BBC DESCRIBES TURKEY AS A RELUCTANT PARTNER

All 28 Nato members are joining an extraordinary meeting to discuss Turkey's campaign against the Islamic State (IS) group and Kurdish militants.

The meeting was called by Turkey, which has staged a dramatic shift in its approach to the Syrian conflict.

The previously reluctant partner in the US-led coalition against IS has launched raids against IS in Syria.

[source : IS conflict: Nato to discuss Turkey-Syria border crisis, BBC, 28th July 2015]

The reality is that Turkey:
1. has been allowing the Syrian rebels to recruit Jihadis in Turkey;
2. has allowed the Jihadis to cross the border into Syria, in some cases providing cover fire for them to protect them from the Syrian military as they invade Syria;
3. has allowed Jihadis to flee into Turkey to escape from the Syrian military;
4. has allowed Islamic State supplies to flow through Turkey and into Syria.

Yet the BBC calls Turkey a "previously reluctant partner"?!

BOLLOCKS!!

Turkey created the crisis in order to provoke this creation of a zone inside Syria, which may or may not be used to protect refugees, which may or may not be protected by rebels, and which may or may not be protected by American air forces or ground troops.

We just don't know the precise details are, only that Turkey and the USA are about to create some kind of zone inside Syria that they are going to 'protect', i.e. provoke an incident that can be used to escalate to war on Syria. This is because in March this year a meeting between all the aggressors against Syria took place in Turkey at which it was agreed that enough was enough, Assad has been resisting their plans for hegemony in the region for far too long, and that the Syrian rebels, i.e. al Nusra etc, will be given everything they wanted and needed, except SAMs, to oust Assad.

These zones, whatever they will be, will be used to provoke an incident with the Syrian military.

Monday, July 27, 2015

WHY AT THIS POINT IN TIME THERE SHOULD NOT BE A TRIBUNAL OVER MH17

First, there has been no such tribunal for previous air traffic incidents, despite such blatant shoot downs of civilian passenger aircraft by the USA and Ukraine.

Second, any such tribunal would be basing its decision on biased evidence:
1. Joost Niemoller reported on the existence of a secret agreement between Ukraine, Netherlands, Australia and Belgium to withhold evidence if one vetoed it (this shows a cynical preparedness to obstruct the course of justice and promote a lack of transparency and neutrality);
2. Netherlands, as a founding member of NATO, wants Ukraine as a member of NATO, while Ukraine wants to become a member of NATO following a violent coup that was run by NATO to install a banker puppet who runs a foundation that is actually sponsored by NATO!!;
3. there have been reports that the Dutch Secret Service have been withholding evidence from and thus guiding the inquiries into MH17, and the reason for this is that Netherlands is a founding member of NATO who want Ukraine as a member.

In my opinion, the current 'investigation' should be scrapped, due to its massive potential for bias and thus injustice, and a brand new investigation, under the control of a truly independent international authority, should begin the investigation from the start. The investigation so far is truly biased, run by a founding member of NATO that wants a suspect, Ukraine, as a member of NATO, and is relying on that suspect, Ukraine, for evidence.

No such investigation would be allowed in any country, not even the most corrupt for fear of embarrassment, for any other crime.

But who gives a fuck : at least Eliot Higgins, after all that whoring for NATO/Atlantic Council, is about to start a PhD at the Dept of War Studies, Kings College, London.

Is that the same Dept of War Studies that just sent an 'academic' to advise Bilderberg on Islamic State?

Yes. It is.

I wonder if this department is aware of the plan revealed to General Wesley Clark shortly after 9/11?



GOOD OL' BOY FROM ATLANTA PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS AGAIN WRITES THAT THE US CIVIL WAR WAS NOT ABOUT SLAVERY

Despite Confederate Vice President Alexander Stephens stating in his sick, white supremacist Cornerstone speech that the American Civil War, from the Confederate point of view, was about slavery, and that the first seven states who seceded explicitly stated that they seceded and started the war because of slavery, Paul Craig Roberts (who was born in Atlanta, Georgia) cites an African-American intellectual Walter E Williams who claims that the civil war was about money.

Williams wrote in the Sun Herald on 21st July:
Why didn't Lincoln share the same feelings about Southern secession? Following the money might help with an answer. Throughout most of our nation's history, the only sources of federal revenue were excise taxes and tariffs. During the 1850s, tariffs amounted to 90 percent of federal revenue. Southern ports paid 75 percent of tariffs in 1859. What "responsible" politician would let that much revenue go?

[source : WALTER E. WILLIAMS: War of 1861 wasn't really a Civil War, Sun Herald, http://www.sunherald.com/2015/07/21/6331277_walter-e-williams-war-of-1861.html?rh=1, 21st July 2015]

The facts are that, as laid out clearly in Treason in America by Anton Chaitkin, the British engineered the war using slavery: the North was incited to fight against slavery; the South was incited to fight for slavery. Lincoln may well not have been the anti-slavery hero he has been made out to be, not before the war started anyway. But Lincoln preserved the Union against this intrigue by the British.

And after the war he cunningly destroyed slavery in the USA, as shown in Spielberg's film Lincoln.

Was that a bad thing Lincoln did? To destroy slavery in the USA? I don't think so.

But for that he was assassinated by a British nest of spies operating out of Canada.

And for assisting Lincoln during the civil war the British began intrigue against Russia, resulting in the Bolshevik Revolution and the murder of the Romanovs.

But this is what Libertarianism can do to you: Williams is an African-American; Williams is also a Libertarian; yet he hates Lincoln for freeing the slaves!!

Can you get your head around that?

Because I can't.

So a word of advice: beware Libertarianism. You end up loving President Andrew Jackson and hating Lincoln for destroying slavery in the USA.







WASHINGTON POST CLAIMS THE USA AND TURKEY HAVE AGREED ON SAFE ZONES IN SYRIA

The Washington Post is reporting that the USA and Turkey have agreed that safe zones in Syria should be implemented.
Turkey and the United States have agreed on the outlines of a de facto “safe zone” along the Turkey-Syria border under the terms of a deal that is expected to significantly increase the scope and pace of the U.S.-led air war against the Islamic State in northern Syria, according to U.S. and Turkish officials.

The agreement includes a plan to drive the Islamic State out of a 68-mile-long area west of the Euphrates River and reaching into the province of Aleppo that would then come under the control of the Syrian opposition. If fully implemented, it would also bring American planes in regular, close proximity to bases, aircraft and air defenses operated by the Syrian government, and directly benefit opposition rebels fighting President Bashar al-Assad’s regime.

...A senior administration official, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said in a statement late Sunday that “any joint military efforts” with Turkey “will not include the imposition of a no-fly zone.”

“What we are talking about with Turkey is cooperating to support partners on the ground in northern Syria who are countering ISIL,” the statement said. “The goal is to establish an ISIL-free zone and ensure greater security and stability along Turkey’s border with Syria.” ISIL is another term for the Islamic State.

NATO’s secretary general said Sunday that the alliance’s 28 members will hold consultations Tuesday in Brussels in response to a Turkish request that followed a suicide bombing in Turkey last week. The consultations are under NATO’s Article 4, allowing any member to convene a meeting when it believes its territorial integrity or security is threatened.

[source : U.S.-Turkey deal aims to create de facto ‘safe zone’ in northwest Syria, Washington Post, https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/new-us-turkey-plan-amounts-to-a-safe-zone-in-northwest-syria/2015/07/26/0a533345-ff2e-4b40-858a-c1b36541e156_story.html?hpid=z1, 26th July 2015]

Lest we forget: Turkey created this 'problem'.

Sunday, July 26, 2015

I KNOW WHAT YOU DID LAST SUMMER

J

R

WHEN WILL THE STOP THE WAR COALITION STOP BEING GATEKEEPERS PROTECTING THE BRITISH MONARCHY?

WW1 was not going to happen anyway.

The British Monarchy planned WW1...and WW2.

LPAC - 1932


Though this documentary completely ignores the rounding up of the native Americans and forcing them onto reservations of ever decreasing size and wealth, it exposes the collaboration between the USA, Germany and Russia that threatened the power of the Brutish Empire, so the British monarchy decided that world war leading to a world government they would control was the only way to save their hegemony.

Simples!

DID ASSAD INVITE THIS COMING INVASION?

Assad stated on Syrian TV today that his army is struggling to replace soldiers who have been killed in the violence instigated in Syria by NATO/Zionist/Gulf powers in 2011. As a consequence the Syrian Arab Army is concentrating on saving a rump of Syria.

This will lead to the partition of Syria.

So did Assad basically concede defeat today, and agree to a partition of Syria?

Evidence for a backdoor deal is:
1. Russia and Saudi Arabia are engaged in highly significant business deals;
2. Russia has agreed with Turkey to send Russian gas to Europe through Turkey;
3. Turkey is now beginning to implement safe/buffer/no fly zones over Syria;
4. Assad may, repeat may, indicating that his army can only defend particular regions of Syria, so is he prepared to concede the loss of those regions the SAA cannot control?

Note the timing: Assad says his army is struggling; several hours later, but on the same day, Turkey calls for a NATO meeting about threats to Turkey.

SURPRISE! TURKEY CALLS FOR SPECIAL NATO MEETING OVER THREATS TO TURKEY (WHICH TURKEY EITHER CREATED OR PROVOKED)

Things just get more surreal by the minute.

Turkey has called for a special meeting of NATO citing Article IV of the Washington Treaty.

Article 4

The Parties will consult together whenever, in the opinion of any of them, the territorial integrity, political independence or security of any of the Parties is threatened.

The next step will be to cite Article V.

Article 5

The Parties agree that an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all and consequently they agree that, if such an armed attack occurs, each of them, in exercise of the right of individual or collective self-defence recognised by Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations, will assist the Party or Parties so attacked by taking forthwith, individually and in concert with the other Parties, such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area.

Any such armed attack and all measures taken as a result thereof shall immediately be reported to the Security Council. Such measures shall be terminated when the Security Council has taken the measures necessary to restore and maintain international peace and security .

So things are looking good for August, when the powerful section of the world (NATO) goes on holiday and doesn't give a fuck about anything.

BUT SHE SAID THE KIEV NAZIS HAD BEEN MARGINALISED

In June this year, Atlantic Council colleague of Eliot Higgins, Alina Polyakova, had told us that there were no Nazis in the Ukraine government, and that they had been marginalised. I covered this in ALINYA POLYAKOVA WHITEWASHES NATO COUP IN UKRAINE, in which I quote Polyakova thus:
The Russian government and its proxies in eastern Ukraine have consistently branded Kyiv's government a fascist junta and accused it of having Nazi sympathizers. Moscow's propaganda is outrageous and wrong. In fact, Ukraine's radical right political parties—Right Sector and Svoboda—have been marginalized.

But hang on. What do we have here?

Ukraine's government has a problem on its hands: A far-right group has tapped into growing frustration among Ukrainians over the declining economy and tepid support from the West. Right Sector (Pravy Sektor) has a dangerous agenda.

In the most direct challenge to Kyiv's government, Right Sector announced that it will begin organising a national referendum on the population's distrust of Ukraine's parliament, cabinet, and the president.

...The $50 billion called for by George Soros is the minimum “lifeline” that Ukraine needs to survive. Without this injection of financial support, groups like the Right Sector will continue to make political noise that distracts from the real work that Ukraine’s leaders must do.

...Volunteers returning from the front lines report fighting with regular Russian army forces, not Ukrainian separatists. While the Ukrainian government has repeatedly said that tens of thousands of Russian troops are fighting in eastern Ukraine, it has refused to call the conflict a war, preferring to use the ambiguous ATO label.

The government has a legitimate reason for this ambiguity: calling the conflict a war would cut off Ukraine from much needed financial assistance from international lending agencies, such as the International Monetary Fund, which do not provide assistance to countries at war.

However, as evidence of Russian troops and military bases in Ukraine mounts, volunteer fighters have grown frustrated with the language from Kyiv’s officials.

[source : Alina Polykova, Kiev's far-right problem, EU Observer, https://euobserver.com/opinion/129752, 24th July 2015]

Damn it, eh?

Those pesky neo-Nazis. They just won't go away. You first use them to oust a legitimately elected government to provoke Russia, and they are supposed to just fade away, but they just won't go away. They are the neo-Nazi fart in the Ukrainian spacesuit. Demanding this neo-Nazi policy. Demanding that neo-Nazi policy.

A word of advice, love. Just don't use neo-Nazis. OK?

Simples!

Just stay true to NATO principles, do not piss on the graves of those who died fighting Nazis in WW2, and don't use extreme nationalist neo-Nazis such as Right Sector and Svoboda in a violent NATO-sponsored coup to oust a legitimately elected government and provoke Russia.

OK?

OK.





ACCIDENTAL GUERRILLAS

just read these brief extracts:
One possibility is two or three safe zones in more remote parts of the country, backed up by perhaps 1,000 American military personnel and other countries’ special forces in each (with an implied annual cost of perhaps several billion dollars2), rather than a snowballing and successful nationwide campaign.

...This approach builds on current U.S. strategy, but with a much less glaring mismatch between means and ends. Requiring ideological purity of opposition fighters would no longer be quite as high of a bar. Requiring that they were untainted by past associations with extremists would no longer be a central element of the vetting process either.

Training opposition fighters in the safety of Turkey, Jordan, and other friendly countries would still be the first step. But it would not over time be sufficient, either, since many opposition fighters are reluctant to leave their home territories—and thereby leave their families and communities unprotected—in order to go abroad for training. The idea would be to help moderate elements establish reliable safe zones within Syria once they were able. American, as well as Saudi and Turkish and British and Jordanian and other Arab forces would act in support, not only from the air but eventually on the ground via the presence of special forces as well. The approach would benefit from Syria’s open desert terrain which could allow creation of buffer zones that could be monitored for possible signs of enemy attack through a combination of technologies, patrols, and other methods that outside special forces could help Syrian local fighters set up.

Were Assad foolish enough to challenge these zones, even if he somehow forced the withdrawal of the outside special forces, he would be likely to lose his airpower in ensuing retaliatory strikes by outside forces, depriving his military of one of its few advantages over ISIL. Thus, he would be unlikely to do this.

...The ultimate end-game for these zones would not have to be determined in advance. The interim goal might be a confederal Syria, with several highly autonomous zones. One of those zones might be for Alawites. But none could be for ISIL, al-Nusra, or Assad and his inner circle. “Accidental guerrillas,” to use David Kilcullen’s memorable phrase, who had previously been in cahoots with some of these groups could in some cases be forgiven their transgressions, if there were reason to think that they were dependable.

[source : Michael O'Hanlon, Deconstructing Syria, Brookings, June 2015]

So these 'safe' zones that Turkey will establish in North Syria (with the nod from the USA) will protect Syrian refugees from Assad and Islamic State. But we know that the USA proposed Islamic State in 2012!!

There is no pre-destiny of these zones. They are being established to possibly give options.

They are to be protected by American, Saudi, Turkish, British (why British?), Jordanian and other Arab forces, as well as special forces from those and other nations (the SAS are there already).

But note the last paragraph: basically anyone who has fought for al Qaeda or al Nusra will be able to take control of and operate out of one these 'safe' zones. They are to be called Accidental Guerrillas.

So there is no set timeline, no set plan for these 'safe' zones, but the hope is that Syrian rebels, including some veterans of al Qaeda and al Nusra, whose previous membership of those terrorist organisations will be overlooked, will begin to train and then operate out of these 'safe' zones, safe in the knowledge that they will be able carry out guerrilla warfare tactics in Syria against the Syrian military then flee to their safe zone that will be protected by American air force.

In other words, provoke Syria into attacking.

This is sick.

But what is perhaps even more sick is that O'Hanlon was on Russia Today a few months ago pushing these ideas!

So I'm beginning to wonder if a deal has been struck. Saudi Arabia and Russia are doing big business now, and Russia has signed with Turkey to send Russian gas to Europe via Turkey. Yet it is Turkey who has been arguably the enabler of the war in Syria, and who is now using the terrorists that it helped to create as an excuse to bomb Syria and create these safe zones that will turn into American-protected terrorist enclaves.

Confused?

ONE OF THE UGLIEST MEN TO HAVE EVER LIVED

Meet Alexander Hamilton Stephens.



Ugly, ain't he? Like death warmed up.

But to add to this undead ugliness is the fact that Stephens was Vice President of the Confederate States of America. He owned a plantation with over 30 slaves which was called...can you believe this...Liberty Hall!!

In his Cornerstone speech, Stephens stated that the Civil War was over slavery. Not tariffs. Not states rights. Slavery. Have we all got that now?

OK?

OK.

In his Cornerstone speech we find such gems of white supremacy as these:
...Our new Government is founded upon exactly the opposite ideas; its foundations are laid, its cornerstone rests, upon the great truth that the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery, subordination to the superior race, is his natural and moral condition. This, our new Government, is the first, in the history of the world, based upon this great physical, philosophical, and moral truth.

...That we, in maintaining slavery as it exists with us, were warring against a principle-a principle founded in nature, the principle of the equality of man. The reply I made to him was, that upon his own grounds we should succeed, and that he and his associates in their crusade against our institutions would ultimately fail. The truth announced, that it was as impossible to war successfully against a principle in politics as well as in physics and mechanics, I admitted, but told him it was he and those acting with him who were warring against a principle. They were attempting to make things equal which the Creator had made unequal.

...Many Governments have been founded upon the principles of certain classes; but the classes thus enslaved, were of the same race, and in violation of the laws of nature. Our system commits no such violation of nature's laws. The negro by nature, or by the curse against Canaan, is fitted for that condition which he occupies in our system. The architect, in the construction of buildings, lays the foundation with the proper material-the granite-then comes the brick or the marble. The substratum of our society is made of the material fitted by nature for it, and by experience we know that it is the best, not only for the superior but for the inferior race, that it should be so. It is, indeed, in conformity with the Creator. It is not for us to inquire into the wisdom of His ordinances or to question them. For His own purposes He has made one race to differ from another, as He has made "one star to differ from another in glory."

This speech by Stephens exposes his white supremacy and his belief that God had created Africans for the white man to use for slavery. But in doing so Stephens also exposes the moral bankruptcy of religion.

TURKEY WANTS ISIS-FREE ZONE IN SYRIA

Here's just a little more detail on what is going to happen during August, as I had speculated.

Foreign minister Mevlut Cavusoglu said the attacks against Isis were being conducted with the aim of creating an “Isis free zone” in northern Syria but gave no details of how far this buffer would extend into Syria or how it would be maintained.

Mr Cavusoglu said the strikes had been conducted by Turkish forces with the full knowledge of the US but without the involvement of US forces.

“All decisions have been made together with the US within the framework of our agreement, but so far all operations have been conducted by our forces using our own resources,” he said.

[source : Turkey expands air strikes against Isis to include Kurdish separatist bases, FT, http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/9e3d7194-32af-11e5-bdbb-35e55cbae175.html?siteedition=uk#axzz3gyUlwtV3, 25th July 2015]

So Turkey is creating this buffer zone inside Syria with the nod from the USA.

Have you all got that?

This is what I based my forecast on:
1. Assad, with support from Russia, Iran and Hezbollah, has been holding up the plan revealed to General Wesley Clark for 4 years;
2. in March this year a clandestine meeting took place in Turkey at which the aggressors against Syria (one of whom is Turkey!!) agreed that enough was enough, and that the Syrian rebels would be given everything they needed, except SAMs, to finish the job they were paid to do in 2011 of ousting Assad;
3. within weeks of this meeting the rebels started to make spectacular gains, but these were quickly rolled back by the Syrian military, who were naturally accused of using chemical weapons;
4. so Brookings released a report proposing buffer and no fly zones in Syria that the Syrian military dare not attack for fear of retaliation;
5. then a highly suspicious terrorist attack occured at Sousse which targeted British holiday makers which provoked more calls for war on Syria, but it turns out that the accused man behind that attack in Sousse ran a terrorist organisation out of London when there was a Covenant of Security between Islamic terrorists and MI5 so it is possible that he is still a British agent.

On 17th July I posted STEW IN YOUR OWN FILTH in which I stated:
I think something is planned for August, to increase international tension, maybe destabilision for war, but until then...

Saturday, July 25, 2015

THOUGHT FOR T'DAY ON WHATEVER

If you:
1. have three children;
2. are told with references how this shitty, violent, unequal world really works;
3. are also told that you may be able to help change this shitty, violent, unequal world.

Do you:
(a) shrug your shoulders and say, "Whatever. I am Queen. I know best.";
(b) ostracise whoever was asking you to help, and treat them like they are a piece of shit;
(c) shag;
(d) do not offer to help;
(e) some combination of (a), (b), (c) and (d);

or

(f) offer to help to make this world safer for your children.

Can you believe this: I know someone who meets the description specified in 1, 2 and 3, but who chose (e)!!!!!

CHENEY WATCHED 9/11 ATTACKS ON TV WITH HIS FEET UP

While W was out of town on 9/11, VP Dick Cheney was effectively Prez.

On 9/11 alleged hijacked planes flew unimpeded around the most protected airspace in the world for nearly 2 hours, before flying into WTC and...get a load of this...THE FRIGGIN' PENTAGON!!

Meanwhile, Cheney watched the attacks unfold on TV with his feet up.



Cheney had just a few years earlier signed the Statement of Principles of The Project for a New American Century, as had Donald Rumsfeld and Paul Wolfowitz.

And one year before 9/11 PNAC had published Rebuilding America's Defenses in which PNAC stated that they believed that Iraq and Iran were the greatest threats to US national security, and that the USA should assert its hegemony through multiple simultaneous wars across the globe, but recognised the need for a "new Pearl Harbor" to provoke the American public into supporting those Zionist wars.

On 9/11:
1. Cheney was Vice Prez but effectively Prez while W was in Florida;
2. Donald Rumsfeld was Secretary of Defense;
3. Wolfowitz was Deputy Secretary of Defense.

Hence, Cheney watched 9/11 unfold on a TV with his feet up!

9/11 was the "new Pearl Harbor" that PNAC wanted.

And shortly after 9/11, General Wesley Clark was told of a plan for war and regime change in seven countries in five years, those countries being Iraq, Iran, Lebanon, Syria, Libya, Sudan and Somalia, all of whom had nothing to do with 9/11!!

The series of wars since 9/11 has been:
Iraq in 2003
Lebanon in 2006
Libya in 2011
Syria since 2011 -

CONFIRMATION BY BBC OF SAFE ZONES IN SYRIA

This comes after Turkey has been assisting Islamic State and Syrian rebels for years!

Turkey's military had also shelled Islamic State and PKK positions from across the Turkish border, the statement said.

Turkey was "determined to take every step to ensure the peace and security of our people", it added.

Areas of northern Syria cleared of IS fighters will become a natural "safe zones", Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu told reporters on Saturday.

[source : Turkey's air force hits IS and PKK in Syria and Iraq, BBC, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-33663005, 25th July 2015]


SURPRISE! TURKEY SAYS NORTH SYRIA WILL BECOME A SAFE ZONE

Sky News is reporting that the Foreign Minister of Turkey is stating that the areas of Northern Syria which Turkey clears of 'militants' (who Turkey has been assisting for years) will become safe zones.

What did I just say yesterday? That I was expecting something big regarding Syria over August?

I said this because:
1. Syria has been holding up the plan revealed to General Wesley Clark shortly after 9/11, a plan for war and regime change in seven countries that was supposed to take just 5 years, yet here we are, in 2015, nearly 14 years later, and only a half of the targeted nations have experienced war and/or regime change;
2. so in March this year, all the aggressors against Syria met in secret in Turkey and agreed that enough was enough and that the 'rebels', i.e. al Qaeda, Jabhat al Nusra, would get everything they wanted, except SAMs, to take out Assad, who has been holding up the plan for 4 years;
3. as reported by Tony Cartalucci, a Brookings report a month or two ago proposed safe zones, buffer zones, no fly zones in Syria to be policed by Turkey and NATO powers that Syria dare not attack;
4. shortly after this report there was a terrorist attack in Sousse, Tunisia, which has a strong whiff of a false flag run by British Intelligence (the intellectual and his organisation suspected of the attack were based in the UK when there was a Covenant of Security between Islamic terrorists and British security services), and that attack led to increased calls for open interference in Syria by the UK, and the revelation that British pilots have already been bombing Syria but as part of a coalition.

What evidence do we have that the terrorist attack in Turkey earlier this week which as provoked these attacks by Turkey on Syrian soil was indeed Islamic State?

And even if it was Islamic State, was it a LIHOP?

We know who in reality runs Islamic State.

WHO ELSE DO WE KNOW BANNED COMMUNIST PARTIES?

Ukraine has this week banned Communist parties from participating in Ukraine elections.

Who else was it that banned Communist parties? He had a weird haircut, a weird 'tache, and allegedly murdered 6 million Jews.

This occurs as the neo-Nazis, who NATO used to oust a legitimately elected government (thereby pissing on the graves of all those who died fighting the Nazis in WW2, British and American), are openly threatening Poroshenko with execution in a dark dungeon because he is not Nazi enough!!



Friday, July 24, 2015

TTS FUNNIEST LINE IN A BRITISH FILM

In Kes, a vain overweight PE teacher thinks he is the greatest footballer to have ever lived. During a PE lesson he is not only player-captain of one team, thinking he is Bobby Charlton, he is also referee. At one point he dives in the penalty area, without being touched, and awards himself a penalty. He scuffs the first attempt, and awards himself a retake, to the outrage of the school boys taking the lesson. And, of course, at the second attempt he scores, and runs away acting like he'd just scored the goal that won the FA Cup.

Later in the game he tackles one boy very harshly, knocking the boy over, and unsurprisingly does not award the boy a free kick. The boy gets up, and shouts at the teacher, "You fat twat!", and then says to a team mate of the teacher, "He needs bleedin' milking!"

WHY IS JEREMY CORBYN THE MOST DANGEROUS MAN IN BRITAIN?

I'll let Chunky Mark answer that.

JOHN MANN MP : WHO DOES HE THINK HE IS KIDDING?

John Mann MP has written an open letter to Jeremy Corbyn MP in an attempt to smear Corbyn as sympathetic to child sex abusers.



Mann questions Corbyn's politics by questioning Corbyn's reaction to the allegations of child abuse in Islington.

But hang on. What do we have here?

John Mann's voting record shows that he:
1. voted for war on Iraq;
2. voted against an inquiry into the war on Iraq;
3. voted to renew Trident;
4. voted for a No Fly Zone over Libya.

In other words, if Mann is accusing Corbyn of facilitating child sex abuse then through his voting record Mann, like many MPs, can be blamed for Islamic State.

Mann did however vote against war on Syria in 2013.

Mann, unlike Corbyn, did not vote against the eyewatering austerity being implemented to bail out the Tory's mates, the bankers.

Mann's policy on the Israel-Palestine conflict is camouflaged through citing the it's-racist-to-criticise-Israel argument. He is pro-Israel.

Take these tweets by Mann that I found on the North West Friends of Israel website:
1. Gerald Kaufman should retire now :)

2. I congratulate North West Friends of Israel for doing its job

3. line into anti Semitism crossed this summer. Most Jews are Zionist & demonizing of Zionists is demonizing Jews & is racist

[source : John Mann in Conversation with Ivan Lewis – Key Tweets as tweeted by @NorthWestFOI, North West Friends of Israel, http://nwfoi.org.uk/john-mann-conversation-ivan-lewis-key-tweets/, 12th December 2014]

Note the date: 12th December 2014, just a few months after Israel had blown to bits at least 500 Palestinian children and at least 2000 Palestinians in total during July and August of 2014.

One must ask if Mann is using the child abuse inquiry to hide his warmongering?

Corbyn has always demanded an independent inquiry into child sex abuse.

Corbyn is correct: Mann has dragged the Labour leadership debate to a new low.

But look at this tweet I found on Mann's twitter:


I'm expecting something to happen during August regarding Syria. As reported by Tony Cartalucci, plans are being made to implement no fly zones and buffer zones inside Syria that the Syrian military will dare not attack for fear of retaliation by the NATO/Zionist/Gulf powers who unleashed the plague of Jihadi locusts onto Syria in the first place. Within a week or two of this report there was the attack at Sousse in Tunisia on British holidaymakers which has a strong connection to British Intelligence and led to increased calls for open interference in Syria.

And in March this year a meeting took place between all the powers backing the anti-Assad forces at which it was decided that enough was enough and that the anti-Assad forces would be given everything, besides SAMs, to finish the job they started in 2011.

Thursday, July 23, 2015

1% PAY RISE FOR THE WORKERS. MUCH MUCH MORE FOR THE WORLD WARMONGERS.

Her Great Grandfather King Edward VII began engineering WW1 by bringing Great Britain out of "splendid isolation" to arrange the Triple Entente that would, and did, surround Germany in a major war.

Her Grandfather King George V tricked Germany into invading Belgium by telling Germany that Great Britain would not become involved in any war on the European continent while at the same time telling Sir Edward Grey to get Great Britain in any war after the Freemasonic assassination of Arch Duke Ferdinand had destabilised Europe.

But it now looks like the £ 4 million pay rise announced a few weeks ago, paid to the Queen by the British people, is not enough for her. The Duchy of Lancaster is about to provide another bumper pay rise! And for what?

And to really take the piss: "The Queen voluntarily pays income tax on the Duchy profits but the accounts do not say how much."

Accounts posted online for the year ending March 2015 reveal record profits for the Duchy which will give the Queen a £2.4 million increase to fund her expenditure.

The Queen is due an inflation-busting 18% pay rise with a bumper payout of £16MILLION from the Duchy of Lancaster.

She will also get a £2.4 million increase to fund her official and private expenditure, accounts posted online for the year ending March 2015 reveal.

This money is on top of the annual Sovereign Grant she gets from the taxpayer, which will go up from £37.9 million to £40.1 million for the year ending March 2016.

The Queen’s raise comes as Chancellor George Osborne has slapped a 1% pay rise freeze on public sector workers, including nurses and teachers.

The Queen has three main strands of income - the Sovereign Grant, Duchy of Lancaster and her private investments which she is not required to make public.

The Duchy of Lancaster is land of around 18,000 hectares in England and Wales which was set up in 1399 to provide an income for the Sovereign.

The Queen has no say in how it is run but she collects all its net profits and uses them to pay for a mixture of private and official expenditure, including the offices of Prince Andrew, Prince Edward and Princess Anne and the upkeep of Balmoral Castle.

It is generally considered to be her private income but republicans argue that it is money that would go to the Treasury if we didn’t have a Monarchy.

The latest Duchy of Lancaster financial report says: “The Net surplus delivered to the Keeper of the Privy Purse also increased by 18% to £16.0m (2014: £13.6m).

“The strong performance for the years has been spread across all portfolios.”

The accounts also show that the value of the estate rose 6.8% to £472.1 million from £442 million in 2014.

Nathan Thompson, CEO and Clerk of the Duchy Council, said that the performance for the year has been strong as major redevelopment projects have been completed and the Duchy is starting to benefit from structural changes implemented last year.

He said: “The strong performance for the year has been spread across all the portfolios and asset classes.

“The new team is working well together, the markets are in our favour and we look forward to the year ahead.”

The pay rise is more than double last year’s increase where the Queen received a rise of 8.5% from £12.5 million in the year ending 2013 to £13.6 million in the year ending 2014.

The Queen voluntarily pays income tax on the Duchy profits but the accounts do not say how much.

Republic's Chief Executive Graham Smith said: “This adds to our demands for radical reform in the way the Monarchy is funded.

“We ought to put the Queen on a salary and all that money should go to the Treasury and be spent on services and perhaps put back into the community.”

[source : Queen set for a huge 18% pay rise with a £16MILLION payout and extra £2.4MILLION for expenses, Daily Mirror, http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/queen-set-huge-18-pay-6125421, 23rd July 2015]

HERE IS AN UNFUNNY ZIONIST CONSPIRACY FOR THE UNFUNNY DAVID BADDIEL

The 'comic' David Baddiel has had a go at 'conspiracy theories' about Jews in The Guardian.
Why do so many conspiracy theories boil down to: it’s the Jews wot done it?

[source : Short of a conspiracy theory? You can always blame the Jews, The Guardian, http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/jul/22/conspiracy-theory-jews-david-cameron-antisemitism-extremism, 22nd July 2015]

I'll never get sick of posting this video because it explains so much. Here is General Wesley Clark explaining how he was told shortly after 9/11 that the USA was going to implement a plan for war and regime change in seven countries in five years: Iraq, Iran, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Sudan and Somalia.



There are several things to note from this:
1. Paul Wolfowitz suggested in 1991 that the USA had 5 to 10 years to take out those old Soviet client regimes, Iraq, Iran and Syria;
2. in 1996 a think tank produced a document entitled A Clean Break which basically called for war on Lebanon but also Iraq, Iran and Syria;
3. in 1998 a political organisation called Project for a New American Century was formed by Robert Kagan and William Kristol, whose first act was to write to then President Bill Clinton demanding war on Iraq. Many members of PNAC were active Zionists working for Israel;
4. in 2000 PNAC published Rebuilding America's Defenses which named Iraq and Iran as the greatest threats to US national security (are you beginning to see a pattern now?), and then proposed that the USA assert its power across the globe through multiple simultaneous wars but recognising the need for a "new Pearl Harbor" to persuade Americans to support such wars;
5. on 11th September 2001, while President Bush was in Florida reading his favourite book to a class of schoolchildren, powerful members of PNAC were essentially in charge of the American government, but particularly the defence, as somehow Islamic terrorists were allegedly able to fly hijacked passenger planes unimpeded around the most protected airspace in the world for nearly 2 hours before performing nearly impossible manoeuvres and flying those hijacked planes into the World Trade Center and...can you believe this...THE PENTAGON!!
6. the events of 9/11 provided the "new Pearl Harbor" desired by PNAC, which they used to implement the plan for war and regime change in seven countries in five years, all seven of whom had nothing to do with 9/11.

However, before this was implemented a coalition was formed to bomb and invade Afghanistan. This is obviously not a Zionist conspiracy. We went into Afghanistan to restore the opium harvests for our ruling families (who have controlled the drugs trade for centuries) after the Taliban had eradicated the crops.

But after that, in 2003, the plan was implemented.

In 2003 we invaded Iraq after being told that Iraq was involved in 9/11 and had WMDs. Neither claim turned out to be true.

And here is the killer clue: in 2006 Israel provoked a war with Hezbollah.

So, as reported by Seymour Hersh in The Redirection, by 2007 this original plan was moribund, so the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia agreed that the latter would unleash the nastiest international cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria, Lebanon and Iran (three of the seven). But for whatever reason they were first unleashed onto Libya (another of the seven).

But after Libya the Jihadis were shipped to Syria, where for 4 years they have been trying to oust President Bashar al-Assad. Because by summer 2013 the Jihadis had failed to oust Assad, Prince Bandar of Saudi Arabia threatened that if Putin didn't dump Assad then Bandar would unleash hell on earth in Syria. Putin declined, so on 21st August 2013 Bandar unleashed hell on earth in Syria. But that false flag failed to provoke the war on Syria the NATO/Zionist/Gulf powers wanted, so a US DIA plan proposed in 2012, to facilitate the rise of a Salafist entity in East Syria to isolate Assad, has been implemented. That Salafist entity we know as Islamic State.

It's unfunny how the targets of the wars since 9/11 have also been enemies of Israel: Iraq, Lebanon, Libya, Syria.



Wednesday, July 22, 2015

BACK TO LOVE

The Brand New Heavies - Back To Love (Graeme Park Mix)


With bonus:
Brand New Heavies - You Are The Universe (Roger S Universal Mix)

THOUGHT FOR T'DAY ON WARMONGERING TEACHERS

Lyndon Baines Johnson.

It was Johnson, a trained and experienced teacher, who reversed JFK's decision to get out of Vietnam and dragged the USA into a war that lasted over 10 years and resulted in the deaths of 58000 American soldiers, but also 3 million Vietnamese who were fighting for their independence from the French!!

So next time you look your kid's teachers in the eye, ask yourself: would you send my children into war?

Such teachers exist. They'd spend years teaching your children to read and write, raking in the salaries and enjoying the long holidays, and then send your children off to war to kill or be killed.

So is there a noble profession?

Teaching teaches kids how to be good robots and killers.

Nursing helps many to get well, but then there are nurses in abortion clinics. Same goes for doctors.

Lawyers get criminals off and the innocent banged up (plus it's infested with Freemasons).



FUCK BLAIR! VOTE CORBYN!

Blair sold out. He started the series of wars that we have experienced since 9/11 which have resulted in Islamic State. He also freed the City of London (with full Tory support) to gamble, gamble, gamble, a policy that has led to the Tory austerity that many Labour MPs do not have the guts to oppose.

Corbyn is good old fashioned Labour.

For decades the British working man has been screwed, from the right by the Tories, and from the left by New Labour.

It's time to get back to basics: protect the working man from the warmongering fascists.


PHEW! MORE SHAGGING ON THE BBC WHILE CLARK'S REVELATIONS ARE NOWHERE TO BE SEEN

Apparently the BBC has produced a 'film' focusing on Lady Seymour Wolsey entitled The Scandalous Lady W, who during the reign of King George III shagged and shagged and shagged many men, sometimes while her husband watched.

Meanwhile, the BBC has not, repeat not, produced a documentary on the plan for war and regime change in seven countries in five years that was revealed to General Wesley Clark shortly after 9/11. The initial plan, spawned in 1991 at the latest, was for war and regime change in Iraq, Iran, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia and Sudan.

After invading Afghanistan on a bogus hunt for an already dead Osama bin Laden (the true reason was to restore opium harvests that had been eradicated by the Taliban), this plan began to be implemented in 2003, with an invasion of Iraq because, we were told, Iraq had WMD and had done 9/11, both reasons being total bollocks. After Iraq, Israel contrived a war on Hezbollah in 2006, but remarkably lost!

So by 2007 this initial plan, based on the Zionist warmongering document A Clean Break, was moribund.

To inject some life back into the plan the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia agreed that the latter would unleash the nastiest international cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria, Lebanon and Iran. However, between 2007 and 2011 the decision was taken (when and by whom I know not) to unleash the Jihadis onto Libya. After several months of SAS support on the ground and NATO air support, and months of lynching black Libyans for the simple reason they were black, these NATO-supported Jihadis took the piss out the UN SCR 1973 and killed Gaddafi.

After Libya the Jihadis and weapons from Libya's arsenal were smuggled into Syria, perhaps along one of the ratlines that Roland Dumas was asked to plan by the British.

Anyway, since 2011, Syria has been resisting this plague of cutthroat Jihadi locusts who receive financial support from Saudi Arabia, moral and political support from NATO/Zionist/Gulf powers and logistical support from Turkey, Jordan, USA etc, you know, the usual suspects.

But the cutthroat Jihadis failed to oust Assad over a period of 2 years, so Syria suffered a chemical weapons false flag run by Prince Bandar of Saudi Arabia, after he had threatened Putin with unleashing hell on earth in Syria if Putin didn't dump Assad. Putin declined, so Bandar unleased hell on 21st August 2013.

But that failed to provoke a war on Syria due to Ed Miliband and one Vladimir Putin, so a plan proposed by the US DIA in 2012 was implemented to facilitate the rise of a Salafist entity in East Syria to isolate Assad. That entity we know as Islamic State, which is now being used as a reason to openly interfere in Syria through airstrikes and boots on t'ground, as well as an excuse to take away our privacy. No mention is made that there has been a Covenant of Security between the British and Islamic terrorists that the terrorists could operate out of London without fear of prosecution or extradition but only if they attacked targets that coincided with British foreign policy. This is why Michael Adebalajo, despite being a suspected terrorist and drug dealer, was allowed to preach Jihad against Assad on the streets of London before trying to saw Lee Rigby's head off.

And so here we are, on 22nd July 2015, and more and more hints and suggestions, and plans, are being made that the only solution to the problem (that we created) of Islamic State is a No fly Zone and British boots on the ground in Syria (as if the SAS aren't enough, and look how well they did in Libya!!)

Does anyone fancy crowdfunding a documentary on this?

Anyway, which would you prefer: shagging in the 19th Century? Or the truth behind much of the violence in North Africa and the Middle East?

I know which a few teachers would like...

WHY DID TEXAS SECEDE?

Here are the reasons why Texas seceded:
A Declaration of the Causes which Impel the State of Texas to Secede from the Federal Union.

The government of the United States, by certain joint resolutions, bearing date the 1st day of March, in the year A.D. 1845, proposed to the Republic of Texas, then *a free, sovereign and independent nation* [emphasis in the original], the annexation of the latter to the former, as one of the co-equal states thereof,

The people of Texas, by deputies in convention assembled, on the fourth day of July of the same year, assented to and accepted said proposals and formed a constitution for the proposed State, upon which on the 29th day of December in the same year, said State was formally admitted into the Confederated Union.

Texas abandoned her separate national existence and consented to become one of the Confederated Union to promote her welfare, insure domestic tranquility and secure more substantially the blessings of peace and liberty to her people. She was received into the confederacy with her own constitution, under the guarantee of the federal constitution and the compact of annexation, that she should enjoy these blessings. She was received as a commonwealth holding, maintaining and protecting the institution known as negro slavery-- the servitude of the African to the white race within her limits-- a relation that had existed from the first settlement of her wilderness by the white race, and which her people intended should exist in all future time. Her institutions and geographical position established the strongest ties between her and other slave-holding States of the confederacy. Those ties have been strengthened by association. But what has been the course of the government of the United States, and of the people and authorities of the non-slave-holding States, since our connection with them?

The controlling majority of the Federal Government, under various pretences and disguises, has so administered the same as to exclude the citizens of the Southern States, unless under odious and unconstitutional restrictions, from all the immense territory owned in common by all the States on the Pacific Ocean, for the avowed purpose of acquiring sufficient power in the common government to use it as a means of destroying the institutions of Texas and her sister slaveholding States.

By the disloyalty of the Northern States and their citizens and the imbecility of the Federal Government, infamous combinations of incendiaries and outlaws have been permitted in those States and the common territory of Kansas to trample upon the federal laws, to war upon the lives and property of Southern citizens in that territory, and finally, by violence and mob law, to usurp the possession of the same as exclusively the property of the Northern States.

The Federal Government, while but partially under the control of these our unnatural and sectional enemies, has for years almost entirely failed to protect the lives and property of the people of Texas against the Indian savages on our border, and more recently against the murderous forays of banditti from the neighboring territory of Mexico; and when our State government has expended large amounts for such purpose, the Federal Government has refuse reimbursement therefor, thus rendering our condition more insecure and harassing than it was during the existence of the Republic of Texas.

These and other wrongs we have patiently borne in the vain hope that a returning sense of justice and humanity would induce a different course of administration.

When we advert to the course of individual non-slave-holding States, and that a majority of their citizens, our grievances assume far greater magnitude.

The States of Maine, Vermont, New Hampshire, Connecticut, Rhode Island, Massachusetts, New York, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Wisconsin, Michigan and Iowa, by solemn legislative enactments, have deliberately, directly or indirectly violated the 3rd clause of the 2nd section of the 4th article [the fugitive slave clause] of the federal constitution, and laws passed in pursuance thereof; thereby annulling a material provision of the compact, designed by its framers to perpetuate the amity between the members of the confederacy and to secure the rights of the slave-holding States in their domestic institutions-- a provision founded in justice and wisdom, and without the enforcement of which the compact fails to accomplish the object of its creation. Some of those States have imposed high fines and degrading penalties upon any of their citizens or officers who may carry out in good faith that provision of the compact, or the federal laws enacted in accordance therewith.

In all the non-slave-holding States, in violation of that good faith and comity which should exist between entirely distinct nations, the people have formed themselves into a great sectional party, now strong enough in numbers to control the affairs of each of those States, based upon an unnatural feeling of hostility to these Southern States and their beneficent and patriarchal system of African slavery, proclaiming the debasing doctrine of equality of all men, irrespective of race or color-- a doctrine at war with nature, in opposition to the experience of mankind, and in violation of the plainest revelations of Divine Law. They demand the abolition of negro slavery throughout the confederacy, the recognition of political equality between the white and negro races, and avow their determination to press on their crusade against us, so long as a negro slave remains in these States.

For years past this abolition organization has been actively sowing the seeds of discord through the Union, and has rendered the federal congress the arena for spreading firebrands and hatred between the slave-holding and non-slave-holding States.

By consolidating their strength, they have placed the slave-holding States in a hopeless minority in the federal congress, and rendered representation of no avail in protecting Southern rights against their exactions and encroachments. They have proclaimed, and at the ballot box sustained, the revolutionary doctrine that there is a 'higher law' than the constitution and laws of our Federal Union, and virtually that they will disregard their oaths and trample upon our rights.

They have for years past encouraged and sustained lawless organizations to steal our slaves and prevent their recapture, and have repeatedly murdered Southern citizens while lawfully seeking their rendition.

They have invaded Southern soil and murdered unoffending citizens, and through the press their leading men and a fanatical pulpit have bestowed praise upon the actors and assassins in these crimes, while the governors of several of their States have refused to deliver parties implicated and indicted for participation in such offenses, upon the legal demands of the States aggrieved.

They have, through the mails and hired emissaries, sent seditious pamphlets and papers among us to stir up servile insurrection and bring blood and carnage to our firesides.

They have sent hired emissaries among us to burn our towns and distribute arms and poison to our slaves for the same purpose.

They have impoverished the slave-holding States by unequal and partial legislation, thereby enriching themselves by draining our substance.

They have refused to vote appropriations for protecting Texas against ruthless savages, for the sole reason that she is a slave-holding State.

And, finally, by the combined sectional vote of the seventeen non-slave-holding States, they have elected as president and vice-president of the whole confederacy two men whose chief claims to such high positions are their approval of these long continued wrongs, and their pledges to continue them to the final consummation of these schemes for the ruin of the slave-holding States.

In view of these and many other facts, it is meet that our own views should be distinctly proclaimed.

We hold as undeniable truths that the governments of the various States, and of the confederacy itself, were established exclusively by the white race, for themselves and their posterity; that the African race had no agency in their establishment; that they were rightfully held and regarded as an inferior and dependent race, and in that condition only could their existence in this country be rendered beneficial or tolerable.

That in this free government *all white men are and of right ought to be entitled to equal civil and political rights* [emphasis in the original]; that the servitude of the African race, as existing in these States, is mutually beneficial to both bond and free, and is abundantly authorized and justified by the experience of mankind, and the revealed will of the Almighty Creator, as recognized by all Christian nations; while the destruction of the existing relations between the two races, as advocated by our sectional enemies, would bring inevitable calamities upon both and desolation upon the fifteen slave-holding states.


By the secession of six of the slave-holding States, and the certainty that others will speedily do likewise, Texas has no alternative but to remain in an isolated connection with the North, or unite her destinies with the South.

For these and other reasons, solemnly asserting that the federal constitution has been violated and virtually abrogated by the several States named, seeing that the federal government is now passing under the control of our enemies to be diverted from the exalted objects of its creation to those of oppression and wrong, and realizing that our own State can no longer look for protection, but to God and her own sons-- We the delegates of the people of Texas, in Convention assembled, have passed an ordinance dissolving all political connection with the government of the United States of America and the people thereof and confidently appeal to the intelligence and patriotism of the freemen of Texas to ratify the same at the ballot box, on the 23rd day of the present month.

Adopted in Convention on the 2nd day of Feby, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and sixty-one and of the independence of Texas the twenty-fifth.

[source : The Declaration of Causes of Seceding States - Primary Sources, Civil War Trust, http://www.civilwar.org/education/history/primarysources/declarationofcauses.html, Accessed: 22nd July 2015]

Not bad, eh?

Slavery. slavery. slavery. Indian savages (i.e. Native Americans). Banditti. And finishing off with a paragraph on slavery and white supremacy.

Sam Houston was ousted in a coup by racist Texans for his dedication to the Union. And for what? So the racist Texans could fight for their freedom to keep slaves?

WHY IS THIS PROPAGANDA?



It says in the report:
On Tuesday, Ukrainian Deputy Foreign Minister for European Integration Olena Zerkal told a briefing in Kiev that the results of the international inquiry would remain classified.

Here is what the Kiev Post said:
The Netherlands will present a report on an investigation into the Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 (MH17) crash in eastern Ukraine at an August 10 closed session of an international task force investigating the crash but will not publish it for the time being, Ukrainian Deputy Foreign Minister Olena Zerkal said.

[source : Netherlands to present MH17 crash report without publication on Aug. 10, Kiev Post, http://www.kyivpost.com/content/ukraine/netherlands-to-present-mh17-crash-report-without-publication-on-aug-10-393996.html, 22nd July 2015]

No less propaganda than CNN flashing an image of Putin while broadcasting a report on Jihadi John?

No less propaganda than the USA telling the world that Iraq had WMDs and they knew where they were, but 12 years after invasion of Iraq its..."Ooops! We lied! Sorry", and that that lie was told to kick off a series of wars in North Africa and the Middle East on seven nations that was initially planned to last 5 years, but here we are, in 2105, and Syria has held up the plan for 4 years, despite cutthroat Jihadis (NATOspeak = rebels or freedom fighters), a chemical weapons false flag (NATOspeak = Assad killed his own people), and Islamic State being unleashed onto Syria (NATOspeak = Assad created Islamic State to descredit NATO's cutthroat Jihadis the and buys oil off them).

All sides produce propaganda.

It's whether you can be arsed to take your blinkers off to see it all.



Tuesday, July 21, 2015

JOHNNY CASH ON CONFEDERATE GENERAL ROBERT E LEE

This song by Johnny Cash does not put Cash in a good light.

OK, the initial sentences give the appearance that the song is about brotherly love.

But let's make it crystal clear. Lee was considered the finest soldier in the USA at that time. That's why he was offered command of the Union armies. But Lee declined. Lee instead led the Army of Northern Virginia, a slaveholding state. And as I covered earlier today, contrary to the claims of Pastor Chuck Baldwin, guest on Infowars, Lee did not, repeat not, free his slaves before the war started. He treated the slaves under his control poorly, beating returned fugitive slaves, and trying 3 times but failing to sell the adult slaves but he was able to and did sell the children of those slaves.

If Lee had taken command of the Union armies the war would not have lasted anywhere as near as long as it did. Incompetence of the Union generals led to the war lasting so long. Lee beat them time and time again with inferior numbers through brilliance and luck; he was very good; the Union generals were shite. The Union armies only made any progress under Grant and Sherman, and both were ruthless, Grant bordering on reckless, but he could afford the losses.

The lyrics of the song do not address slavery at all. They appear to be the words of a Confederate, who joined the Confederate Army to defend Georgia against Sherman because Sherman was destroying Atlanta. As the lyrics show:
So look away look away Dixie...
I won't ever stop loving you my Dixie till they put me in the ground
And the last words they probably hear from me are God bless Robert E Lee

So are these words sympathetic to the Confederacy?

The lyrics are provided. The initial sentences suggest that the song might be about brotherly love, thanking Lee for surrendering at Appamattox Court House, saving tens of thousands of lives. But if so then why not have a verse from a slave?

And why the reference to "look away look away Dixie", lyrics from the Confederate National Anthem?

Johnny Cash - God Bless Robert E. Lee


And here's another Cash song on the Confederacy:

JOHNNY CASH ~ THE NIGHT THEY DROVE OLD DIXIE DOWN


Is that song sympathetic to the Confederacy?

And here's another:

Johnny Cash - Johnny Reb
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yNq1IDwImPs (embedding disabled)

So that's 3 songs that are explicitly or implicitly sympathetic to the Confederacy.


THE LOOK OF LOVE

the look of love - susanna hoffs

THE EU SCAM IN 38 WORDS

I can testify that world and European government is being pushed in British schools.

It is disguised as life skills or something similar,and at the expense of other, arguably more important, subjects like mathematics. But what I saw they do is provide two reasons for and one reason against world and European government.

This is just one more reason why all parents should get involved in the schools that their children attend. Not only to clearly make it known to the lustful teachers that your children are not the play things of teachers, but to also see and understand how the agenda is being implemented: world and European government; the use of IT to connect children to computers rather than to humans; the anything-goes agenda (anything except the truth, that is) such as transgenderism.



ps I count superstate as one word, but d'ya know what? It doesn't really matter. It's all a scam...and one for which Tsipras was promoted to save.

WHY DID SOUTH CAROLINA SECEDE?

The following is the text verbatim of the cause for their secession by South Carolina:

Declaration of the Immediate Causes Which Induce and Justify the Secession of South Carolina from the Federal Union

The people of the State of South Carolina, in Convention assembled, on the 26th day of April, A.D., 1852, declared that the frequent violations of the Constitution of the United States, by the Federal Government, and its encroachments upon the reserved rights of the States, fully justified this State in then withdrawing from the Federal Union; but in deference to the opinions and wishes of the other slaveholding States, she forbore at that time to exercise this right. Since that time, these encroachments have continued to increase, and further forbearance ceases to be a virtue.

And now the State of South Carolina having resumed her separate and equal place among nations, deems it due to herself, to the remaining United States of America, and to the nations of the world, that she should declare the immediate causes which have led to this act.
In the year 1765, that portion of the British Empire embracing Great Britain, undertook to make laws for the government of that portion composed of the thirteen American Colonies. A struggle for the right of self-government ensued, which resulted, on the 4th of July, 1776, in a Declaration, by the Colonies, "that they are, and of right ought to be, FREE AND INDEPENDENT STATES; and that, as free and independent States, they have full power to levy war, conclude peace, contract alliances, establish commerce, and to do all other acts and things which independent States may of right do."

They further solemnly declared that whenever any "form of government becomes destructive of the ends for which it was established, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it, and to institute a new government." Deeming the Government of Great Britain to have become destructive of these ends, they declared that the Colonies "are absolved from all allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain is, and ought to be, totally dissolved."

In pursuance of this Declaration of Independence, each of the thirteen States proceeded to exercise its separate sovereignty; adopted for itself a Constitution, and appointed officers for the administration of government in all its departments-- Legislative, Executive and Judicial. For purposes of defense, they united their arms and their counsels; and, in 1778, they entered into a League known as the Articles of Confederation, whereby they agreed to entrust the administration of their external relations to a common agent, known as the Congress of the United States, expressly declaring, in the first Article "that each State retains its sovereignty, freedom and independence, and every power, jurisdiction and right which is not, by this Confederation, expressly delegated to the United States in Congress assembled."

Under this Confederation the war of the Revolution was carried on, and on the 3rd of September, 1783, the contest ended, and a definite Treaty was signed by Great Britain, in which she acknowledged the independence of the Colonies in the following terms: "ARTICLE 1-- His Britannic Majesty acknowledges the said United States, viz: New Hampshire, Massachusetts Bay, Rhode Island and Providence Plantations, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina and Georgia, to be FREE, SOVEREIGN AND INDEPENDENT STATES; that he treats with them as such; and for himself, his heirs and successors, relinquishes all claims to the government, propriety and territorial rights of the same and every part thereof."

Thus were established the two great principles asserted by the Colonies, namely: the right of a State to govern itself; and the right of a people to abolish a Government when it becomes destructive of the ends for which it was instituted. And concurrent with the establishment of these principles, was the fact, that each Colony became and was recognized by the mother Country a FREE, SOVEREIGN AND INDEPENDENT STATE.

In 1787, Deputies were appointed by the States to revise the Articles of Confederation, and on 17th September, 1787, these Deputies recommended for the adoption of the States, the Articles of Union, known as the Constitution of the United States.

The parties to whom this Constitution was submitted, were the several sovereign States; they were to agree or disagree, and when nine of them agreed the compact was to take effect among those concurring; and the General Government, as the common agent, was then invested with their authority.

If only nine of the thirteen States had concurred, the other four would have remained as they then were-- separate, sovereign States, independent of any of the provisions of the Constitution. In fact, two of the States did not accede to the Constitution until long after it had gone into operation among the other eleven; and during that interval, they each exercised the functions of an independent nation.

By this Constitution, certain duties were imposed upon the several States, and the exercise of certain of their powers was restrained, which necessarily implied their continued existence as sovereign States. But to remove all doubt, an amendment was added, which declared that the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States, respectively, or to the people. On the 23d May , 1788, South Carolina, by a Convention of her People, passed an Ordinance assenting to this Constitution, and afterwards altered her own Constitution, to conform herself to the obligations she had undertaken.

Thus was established, by compact between the States, a Government with definite objects and powers, limited to the express words of the grant. This limitation left the whole remaining mass of power subject to the clause reserving it to the States or to the people, and rendered unnecessary any specification of reserved rights.

We hold that the Government thus established is subject to the two great principles asserted in the Declaration of Independence; and we hold further, that the mode of its formation subjects it to a third fundamental principle, namely: the law of compact. We maintain that in every compact between two or more parties, the obligation is mutual; that the failure of one of the contracting parties to perform a material part of the agreement, entirely releases the obligation of the other; and that where no arbiter is provided, each party is remitted to his own judgment to determine the fact of failure, with all its consequences.

In the present case, that fact is established with certainty. We assert that fourteen of the States have deliberately refused, for years past, to fulfill their constitutional obligations, and we refer to their own Statutes for the proof.

The Constitution of the United States, in its fourth Article, provides as follows: "No person held to service or labor in one State, under the laws thereof, escaping into another, shall, in consequence of any law or regulation therein, be discharged from such service or labor, but shall be delivered up, on claim of the party to whom such service or labor may be due."

This stipulation was so material to the compact, that without it that compact would not have been made. The greater number of the contracting parties held slaves, and they had previously evinced their estimate of the value of such a stipulation by making it a condition in the Ordinance for the government of the territory ceded by Virginia, which now composes the States north of the Ohio River.

The same article of the Constitution stipulates also for rendition by the several States of fugitives from justice from the other States.

The General Government, as the common agent, passed laws to carry into effect these stipulations of the States. For many years these laws were executed. But an increasing hostility on the part of the non-slaveholding States to the institution of slavery, has led to a disregard of their obligations, and the laws of the General Government have ceased to effect the objects of the Constitution. The States of Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, New York, Pennsylvania, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Wisconsin and Iowa, have enacted laws which either nullify the Acts of Congress or render useless any attempt to execute them. In many of these States the fugitive is discharged from service or labor claimed, and in none of them has the State Government complied with the stipulation made in the Constitution. The State of New Jersey, at an early day, passed a law in conformity with her constitutional obligation; but the current of anti-slavery feeling has led her more recently to enact laws which render inoperative the remedies provided by her own law and by the laws of Congress. In the State of New York even the right of transit for a slave has been denied by her tribunals; and the States of Ohio and Iowa have refused to surrender to justice fugitives charged with murder, and with inciting servile insurrection in the State of Virginia. Thus the constituted compact has been deliberately broken and disregarded by the non-slaveholding States, and the consequence follows that South Carolina is released from her obligation.

The ends for which the Constitution was framed are declared by itself to be "to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity."

These ends it endeavored to accomplish by a Federal Government, in which each State was recognized as an equal, and had separate control over its own institutions. The right of property in slaves was recognized by giving to free persons distinct political rights, by giving them the right to represent, and burthening them with direct taxes for three-fifths of their slaves; by authorizing the importation of slaves for twenty years; and by stipulating for the rendition of fugitives from labor.

We affirm that these ends for which this Government was instituted have been defeated, and the Government itself has been made destructive of them by the action of the non-slaveholding States. Those States have assume the right of deciding upon the propriety of our domestic institutions; and have denied the rights of property established in fifteen of the States and recognized by the Constitution; they have denounced as sinful the institution of slavery; they have permitted open establishment among them of societies, whose avowed object is to disturb the peace and to eloign the property of the citizens of other States. They have encouraged and assisted thousands of our slaves to leave their homes; and those who remain, have been incited by emissaries, books and pictures to servile insurrection.

For twenty-five years this agitation has been steadily increasing, until it has now secured to its aid the power of the common Government. Observing the *forms* [emphasis in the original] of the Constitution, a sectional party has found within that Article establishing the Executive Department, the means of subverting the Constitution itself. A geographical line has been drawn across the Union, and all the States north of that line have united in the election of a man to the high office of President of the United States, whose opinions and purposes are hostile to slavery. He is to be entrusted with the administration of the common Government, because he has declared that that "Government cannot endure permanently half slave, half free," and that the public mind must rest in the belief that slavery is in the course of ultimate extinction.

This sectional combination for the submersion of the Constitution, has been aided in some of the States by elevating to citizenship, persons who, by the supreme law of the land, are incapable of becoming citizens; and their votes have been used to inaugurate a new policy, hostile to the South, and destructive of its beliefs and safety.

On the 4th day of March next, this party will take possession of the Government. It has announced that the South shall be excluded from the common territory, that the judicial tribunals shall be made sectional, and that a war must be waged against slavery until it shall cease throughout the United States.

The guaranties of the Constitution will then no longer exist; the equal rights of the States will be lost. The slaveholding States will no longer have the power of self-government, or self-protection, and the Federal Government will have become their enemy.

Sectional interest and animosity will deepen the irritation, and all hope of remedy is rendered vain, by the fact that public opinion at the North has invested a great political error with the sanction of more erroneous religious belief.

We, therefore, the People of South Carolina, by our delegates in Convention assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, have solemnly declared that the Union heretofore existing between this State and the other States of North America, is dissolved, and that the State of South Carolina has resumed her position among the nations of the world, as a separate and independent State; with full power to levy war, conclude peace, contract alliances, establish commerce, and to do all other acts and things which independent States may of right do.


Adopted December 24, 1860

You see, it was all about slavery and fugitive slaves. South Carolina wanted to keep slavery and the return of their 'property', fugitive slaves. The north wanted to destroy slavery.

Note the day on which this was adopted: Christmas Eve!!!

How very 'christian' of those nice, decent warmhearted folk in South Carolina, the first state to secede!! Peace and goodwill to all men, and all that.

Forget that! They wanted slavery, with all its inhumanity and brutality. But rather than see this inhumanity and brutality, and change to eradicate it, as you would have thought good christian folk would do, they seceded and went to war in order to protect their freedom to keep slaves.

And now there is an attempt to whitewash this with claims of tariffs and Lincoln was a hypocrite.

The truth is that the British and their Scottish Rite Freemasonry drove a wedge into America using the issue of slavery. As a consequence a generation of American youth was not quite destroyed but damaged.

BRITISH BOOTS ON THE GROUND IN SYRIA

Is this the end game in Syria?

British Special Forces are there already, as they were in Libya (and look how great that turned out!)

British boots on the ground in Syria, to 'defeat' Islamic State (that we created), but once on the ground they will never leave, at least not easily or quickly, until they have assisted the 'moderate' rebels, i.e. al Qaeda and Jabhat al Nusra, in defeating President Bashar al Assad?

There is a mission creep in Syria. We know why. The NATO/Zionist/Gulf powers want Assad ousted so they can build a pipeline from the Pars gas field from Qatar through Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Syria and Turkey, with a branch to Israel, and onwards to Europe to threaten Russia's business with Europe. Assad wants a pipeline from the Pars gas field from Iran through Iraq, Syria and Lebanon, avoiding Israel, and onwards to Europe but without threatening Russia's business with Europe.

This is what all the fuss is about in Syria.

But that fuss is actually NATO/Zionist/Gulf powers unleashing the nastiest international cutthroat Jihadis onto Syrian children, but that failed, so they ran a false flag using chemical weapons to provoke a war on Syria, but that failed too, so they facilitated the rise of Islamic State, and...BINGO!! They can now openly interfere in Syria.

But the NATO/Zionist/Gulf powers don't do anything altruistic, out of the goodness of their hearts.

They worship money and power, and money and power alone.

They speak to snakes.

WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN AN INVESTIGATION AND A TRIBUNAL?

An investigation produces evidence. A tribunal judges that evidence.

But if only a handful of countries, who have a vested interest in guaranteeing a particular outcome, control that investigation, and there is a secret agreement between those nations that withholds evidence to bring about that desired outcome, then what use is a tribunal based on that investigation?

The tribunal would see just one version of events.

Is that justice?

So I am in favour of a fully independent international investigation into MH17. What we have had to date is The Netherlands (founders of NATO who want Ukraine in NATO) running an investigation with Ukraine (who want to be in NATO) into the crash of a civilian passenger jet in an area of Ukraine, when the airspace over Ukraine should really have been closed to all civilian air traffic.

The fix is in.

HOW INACCURATE IS PASTOR CHUCK BALDWIN?

In The Confederate Flag Needs To Be Raised, Not Lowered, Pastor Chuck Baldwin writes:
Recall that his counterpart, Confederate General Robert E. Lee, freed his slaves BEFORE hostilities between North and South ever broke out.

Really?

As I understand it, Robert E Lee did not possess that many slaves as such (who he did not free before the war, contrary to Baldwin's claim), but as executor of a will he was given control over many slaves after the death of his father-in-law, George Washington Parke Custis, in 1857. Custis' will stipulated that the slaves should be set free within five years of his death. Lee did not free these slaves before the war started (again, contrary to Baldwin's claim) and in many cases not until the last minute in 1862. So how did Lee treat those slaves? Pretty badly. Many ran away, and those that were returned were beaten, including women. He went to court 3 times during the civil war to gain permission to sell the slaves but lost each time. So he hired the slaves out instead. But he was apparently legally able to sell the children of those slaves, and did so.

This is the true Confederate General Robert E Lee, the man who decided to protect slavery when he refused command over the Union Army in favour of his beloved slaveholding Virginia.

I'm telling you people. There is an operation to ressurect the Confederacy.

And I think it might be part of an attempt to start a race war.

THOUGHT FOR T'DAY ON KAREN DANCZUK'S TITS

Where are they?

I haven't seen a new photo of them for nearly a week!

Have they retired?

Are their public appearances now under control to reduce embarrassment for everyone: herself; her children; her ex-husband; the campaign to expose the powerful paedos who rape and murder children?

Or are their public appearances merely being minimised for contractual reasons?

TTS INAPPROPRIATE SONG OF THE DAY

The O'Jays "Now That We Found Love"


Monday, July 20, 2015

THOUGHT FOR BEDTIME

How many former slaves have recommended slavery?

And how many pro-Confederate chumps have ever been a slave?

William Tecumseh Sherman is credited with saying: War is all hell.

Well, so is slavery. That's why slaves were brutally beaten and tortured.

And why the Confederate states were so concerned about fugitive slaves proving to other slaves that they could be free that the Confederacy went to war over the issue!!

YO! PRIME MINISTER DAVE! YOU FORGET TO MENTION THE COVENANT OF SECURITY, THE REDIRECTION AND GENERAL WESLEY CLARK!

Could we have expected little else than a pile of bullshit?

Roots of the problem

It begins – it must begin – by understanding the threat we face and why we face it. What we are fighting, in Islamist extremism, is an ideology. It is an extreme doctrine.

And like any extreme doctrine, it is subversive. At its furthest end it seeks to destroy nation-states to invent its own barbaric realm. And it often backs violence to achieve this aim – mostly violence against fellow Muslims – who don’t subscribe to its sick worldview.

But you don’t have to support violence to subscribe to certain intolerant ideas which create a climate in which extremists can flourish.

ideas which are hostile to basic liberal values such as democracy, freedom and sexual equality.

Ideas which actively promote discrimination, sectarianism and segregation.

Ideas – like those of the despicable far right – which privilege one identity to the detriment of the rights and freedoms of others.

And ideas also based on conspiracy: that Jews exercise malevolent power; or that Western powers, in concert with Israel, are deliberately humiliating Muslims, because they aim to destroy Islam. In this warped worldview, such conclusions are reached – that 9/11 was actually inspired by Mossad to provoke the invasion of Afghanistan; that British security services knew about 7/7, but didn’t do anything about it because they wanted to provoke an anti-Muslim backlash.

And like so many ideologies that have existed before – whether fascist or communist – many people, especially young people, are being drawn to it. We need to understand why it is proving so attractive.

Some argue it’s because of historic injustices and recent wars, or because of poverty and hardship. This argument, what I call the grievance justification, must be challenged.

So when people say “it’s because of the involvement in the Iraq War that people are attacking the West”, we should remind them: 9/11 – the biggest loss of life of British citizens in a terrorist attack – happened before the Iraq War.

When they say that these are wronged Muslims getting revenge on their Western wrongdoers, let’s remind them: from Kosovo to Somalia, countries like Britain have stepped in to save Muslim people from massacres – it’s groups like ISIL, Al Qaeda and Boko Haram that are the ones murdering Muslims.

Now others might say: it’s because terrorists are driven to their actions by poverty. But that ignores the fact that many of these terrorists have had the full advantages of prosperous families or a Western university education.

[source : Extremism: PM speech, Number 10, https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/extremism-pm-speech, 20th July 2015]

The clown! He forgot to mention The Covenant of Security!

Without this covenant many Islamist extremist organisations would not have been able to survive and thus propagate their extremism.

The clown! He forgot to mention General Wesley Clark!

9/11 was used to trigger a series of seven wars in North Africa and the Middle East that were supposed to take just 5 years. But by 2007 that plan was seriously behind schedule. So the Redirection was implemented.

The clown! He forgot to mention The Redirection!

The redirection was an agreement reached between the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia that the latter would unleash international cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria, Lebanon and Iran. This is why the 'rebels' in Syria are Saudi, French, British, American. We have been allowing, and even encouraging Muslims via preachers like Michael Adebalajo, potential jihadis to go to Syria to join Islamic State.