Sunday, April 19, 2015


The Belling Cat team have at least read what I wrote yesterday.

But facts are facts:
1. USAID is a CIA front;
2. George Soros is, and is an agent for, pure scum based in Wall Street and The City of London.

In that post yesterday I also questioned the integrity of the Knight Foundation who are sponsoring Hacks/Hackers, the third member of that crime-busting trio. The founder of that foundation, John S Knight, had worked as Director of US Censorship in London during WW2, which showed a keen willingness to control information for the US government. Well, call it synchronicity if you want, but this report published yesterday proves that John S Knight was in bed with the CIA.
There were a lot of bad days during the Cold War, but 54 years ago this weekend was one of the worst, at least for the United States. President John F. Kennedy sent an army of anti-Castro exiles backed by the CIA onto the beach at Cuba’s Bay of Pigs to suffer bloody, catastrophic defeat. It was “the beating of our lives,” the despondent Kennedy would say a few days later as he wondered aloud why nobody had talked him out of it.

One of the piquant questions of Cold War history is, could the Miami Herald have done that — talked him out of it? In a little-known collision of journalism and national security, the Herald, seven months before the Bay of Pigs, had prepared a news story saying that the United States was planning to launch a military operation against Cuba. But the paper’s top management killed the story after CIA Director Allen Dulles said publishing it would hurt national security.

[source : The Miami Herald, the CIA, and the Bay of Pigs scoop that didn’t run, Miami Herald,, 18th July 2015]

Guess who had owned The Miami Herald for 24 years by the time of the Bay of Pigs?

Yep. John S Knight of The Knight Foundation!!

JFK was 'misled' by the CIA over The Bay of Pigs, and it was the Bay of Pigs that led to JFK taking his decision to splinter the CIA into a thousand pieces. This possibly contributed one of the reasons for his assassination.

So of this crime-busting trio we have:
1. OCCRP who are financed by
(a) CIA front USAID;
(b) Scumbag Soros
2. Hacks/Hackers who are financed the Knight Foundation, whose founder, John S Knight, kept secret the disastrous and illegal Bay of Pigs invasion for the benefit of the lying CIA/'national security';
3. Belling Cat founded by Eliot Higgins who has an as yet unexplained relationship with the warmongering CIA Neocon Atlantic Council.

Belling Cat can mock all they want.


Saturday, April 18, 2015


The CIA-Soros-Wall Street agent Eliot Higgins has again tried to protect his mates, the warmongers.

Higgins offers several alternatives of who did Ghouta in August 2013 and attempts to debunk them: The Rebels Faked It; The Rebels Did It (Maybe By Accident) With Saudi Chemical Weapons; Al Qaeda Rebels Did It With Turkey’s Help To Trick the US; Al-Qaeda Rebels Did It With Chemical Weapons From Georgia (The State Not The Country) Smuggled Via Gerogia (The Country Not The State) With The Help Of Google Ideas, DynCorp, And Political Groups In Israel And The US With Additional Fake Intelligence From Israel.

But he has not addressed the scenario and culprit that I believe in, and used to predict in mid August 2013 that something terrible was about to happen in Syria. See THE REPORT OF THE WEEK : BANDAR TO UNLEASH HELL ON EARTH IN SYRIA posted on 15th August2013, and WE CAN STOP THE COMING SLAUGHTER IN SYRIA posted the same day.

Does Higgins honestly think that Assad would provide NATO and their Zionist and Gulf allies with the perfect casus belli by killing hundreds of his own people, and thus also risking provoking a coup attempt by officers of the SAA?

Surely by now, if Assad had indeed gassed hundreds of his own people, the Syrian military would have found out about it, and probably killed him in a coup. That has not happened.

The facts are these:
1. independent of whether you believe 9/11 was an inside job or not, the plan revealed to General Wesley Clark shortly after 9/11, for war and regime change in Iraq, Iran, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Sudan and Sonalia (all of whom had sweet FA to do with 9/11) is being implemented;
2. but because by 2007 this plan was moribund, an agreement was reached in 2007 between the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia that the latter would unleash the nastiest cutthroats onto Syria, Lebanon and Iran;
3. to provide these cutthroats with cover as 'freedom fighters' the US State Department organised The Arab Spring;
4. however, the cutthroats were first unleashed onto another nation named on that list, Libya, in a war in which NATO became the air force of Al Qaeda in Islamic Maghreb;
5. after killing Gaddafi the cutthroats were smuggled into Syria (perhaps in one the ratlines that Roland Dumas was asked to organise by British 'Intelligence'), where they have been slitting the throats and sawing the heads off Syrians ever since;
6. but by the middle of 2013 Assad was still in power, so NATO began to express their anger at Obama through editorials in The Washington Post, sometimes twice a week;
7. and when the SAA captured al Qusair, NATO dispatched Prince Bandar of head-chopping Saudi Arabia to Moscow to threaten/bribe Putin: if Putin would dump Assad then Saudi Arabia would purchase billions of dollars of weapons from Russia, otherwise Bandar would unleash hell in Syria to embarrass Putin into dumping Assad.

Putin rejected this lovely, heart-warming offer.

On 21st August 2013 hell was unleashed in Syria.

Can you guess by whom?

Higgins keeps his mouth shut on this, which is why he is being courted by CIA fronts and awarded prizes.


The coup in Ukraine last year has led to a wave of what NATO media calls 'nationalism', which NATO currently supports. This is just because their man Yats, whose foundation Open Ukraine is sponsored by NATO, is Prime Minister and is gradually dragging Ukraine into the NATO sphere of influence. It will be totally different if Ukraine does join NATO. Those same 'nationalists', if they decide to leave NATO to regain their true independence, will be branded 'terrorists' by NATO, much like the rebels in East Ukraine now. The rebellion in East Ukraine is because the people of East Ukraine recognised the Nazism of the junta in Kiev.

What would you do if a gang of thugs wearing Nazi-symbols, waving flags bearing the image of a famous Nazi collaborator and parading through the streets in a Nazi-esque torchlight parade after burning opponents alive, seized power by shooting dead protestors and police to provoke a riot, setting London ablaze and chasing the legitimately elected leader away, particularly if those Nazis were run by Russia?

Well. that is what happened in Kiev: violent NATO-sponsored Nazis shot dead protestors and police from The Conservatory in Kiev, which provoked extreme violence and eventually Yanukovich fleeing for his life from his burning office. Those same Nazis later burned 50 people alive in the Trade Union building in Odessa.

And there now appears to be a Kiev Nazi hit list being created, a database of names and addresses of people who are considered pro-Russian. When Boris Nemtsov was assassinated the news of his death and funeral march were plastered all over NATO media. But in Ukraine there has been a number of assassinations of politicians and journalists, some of whom are on this Kiev Nazi hit list.

Needless to say, why should NATO media report on this if the Kiev Nazis are being used to drag Ukraine in to NATO?


The OCCRP, in league with BellingCat, should be investigating their sponsors, George Soros and the CIA.

These two have committed, are committing and plan to commit major crimes and major crimes against humanity.

Stop them before it is too late.


In September last year it was announced that:
Open-source investigations site Bellingcat today launched a new project to investigate global networks of crime and corruption.

The London Project Investigathon is a collaboration between Bellingcat, Hacks/Hackers London and the Organised Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP).

It will bring together journalists, investigators and researchers to share knowledge on the latest open-source tools and techniques required to carry out investigations, by organising regular events to work on live projects.

"Because these are transferable skills, we can set them up doing projects that we're giving them but they'll learn stuff that they can use in their own projects," said Eliot Higgins, founder of Bellingcat and the Brown Moses blog on munitions used in the Syrian conflict.

[source : New Bellingcat project to investigate cross-border corruption, Journalism,, 29th September 2014]

The Organised Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP) is of great interest. Why? Because it has links to the CIA and George Soros.

The very, very long home page of the Organised Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP) states the following right at the very bottom:
Made possible by Open Society Institute and Soros Foundation Network, and USAID

Can you guess who the OCCRP's Man of the Year is?

I'll give you a few clues:
1. he was the driving force behind the BRICS Development Bank;
2. he stopped the planned war on Syria in 2013 after Prince Bandar's false flag of Ghouta;
3. he is supporting Syria against the not-so-covert invasion of Syria by the Saudi-sponsored international cutthroat Jihadi butchers.

You should have enough now to deduce that OCCRP's Man of the Year is.......VLADIMIR PUTIN!!

Here is what OCCRP say about Putin:
Putin has been a finalist every year so you might consider this a lifetime achievement award. He has been a real innovator in working with organized crime. He has created a military-industrial-political-criminal complex that furthers Russia’s and Putin’s personal interests. I think Putin sees those interests as one and the same.
- Drew Sullivan, Editor of OCCRP

Why should we be very suspicious of the motives of OCCRP?

USAID is a CIA front. It was initially created by JFK to foster economic development and humanitarian projects. But someone put a stop to that on 22nd November 1963 (and it wasn't Lee Harvey Oswald from a sixth floor window). In Vietnam the CIA took over USAID. Since then USAID has been helping to violently and covertly through subversion spread Americanism across the globe.

So why is USAID financing OCCRP, an organisation that apparently has Putin as its number one target?

Hmm. Could it be that OCCRP has a hidden agenda?

And then we have Rothschild agent George Soros. Do you realise how Soros came to be so rich? During the early 1990's Soros attacked several currencies in Europe, including the Pound Sterling with the green light from Buckingham Palace. He lived to tell the tale and is now a powerful man in Bilderberg, which suggests it was all an engineered scam. Soros uses his ill gotten gains to further the agenda by funding colour revolutions in former Soviet states, euthanasia and drug legalisation. For a good expose of who Soros is and what he represents (which is pure scum) see The Secret Financial Network Behind "Wizard" George Soros by William Engdahl, and Your Enemy, George Soros by EIR.

And this Hacks/Hackers partner of BellingCat and OCCRP may not be so independent either. They are funded by the Knight Foundation whose founder worked as US Director of Censorship in London during WW2, thus indicating a strong desire to work for the American government in controlling information.

So far from being an independent good-hearted project, this looks to me like Belling Cat, wittingly or unwittingly, have jumped into bed once again with the CIA-Wall Street cabal, in addition to Higgins' secret undisclosed relationship with the warmongering CIA Neocon Atlantic Council.

Friday, April 17, 2015


The Ken Loach film Hidden Agenda ends with this quote:
It is like layers of an onion, and the more you peel them away, the more you feel like crying. There are two laws running this country: one for the security services and one for the rest of us.
- James Miller, ex-MI5 agent

British Security Services have been implicated in cover ups of paedophiles, possibly for political control.

Yesterday it was reported that a member of the establishment, Lord Greville Janner, would not be prosecuted for kiddie-fiddling because of his 'dementia'.

But it turns out that Janner had a go at the British justice system for not prosecuting a suspected Nazi war criminal for the very same reason of 'dementia'!!


Jeroen Akkermans is the man who claims to have found fragments of a BUK missile at the crash site of MH17, but instead of informing the proper and relevant investigating authorities of the location of these fragments he removed them from the crime scene, and did not inform anyone until months later when analysts said the fragments could come from a BUK missile.

I note that this week members representing the MH17 JIT returned to the crash site. Did they find any mysterious fragments? Has anyone else found any mysterious fragments and handed them over?

This find makes Akkermans a lucky man.

But Akkermans is actually luckier than that.

Because just days after MH17 crashed Akkermans allegedly photographed the man who says he was allegedly sent to the crash site by the separatists to capture the pilots. This man would not give his name but he allowed the lucky Akkermans to take several photographs of him (wearing dark sun glasses, obviously).

And Akkermans is even luckier than that!

Akkermans was in Ukraine, in particular Maidan, taking photographs galore of events at the time of the 'revolution'. In his Flickr account Akkermans does not photograph a single neo Nazi or Nazi symbol or mention their presence in any written report (that I can find)! I mean, how lucky is that?!

So according to Akkermans:
1. he found fragments of the BUK that shot down MH17 even though nobody else over a period of 8 months has found anything similar;
2. he photographed the guy allegedly sent by the separatists to capture the pilots of MH17;
3. he didn't see a single neo Nazi or Nazi symbol throughout the violent NATO-sponsored neo-Nazi coup.

I'd like Akkermans to tell me the numbers of the lotto for this weekend.


Upon the first news of MH17, the US State Department issued this statement:
We are horrified by the crash of Malaysia Airlines flight MH17. There are no words adequate to express our condolences to the families of the nearly 300 victims. We offer our sympathies and support to the Governments of Malaysia and the Netherlands at this difficult time, as well as to all those whose citizens may have been on board. We are reviewing whether any American citizens were aboard the flight. The United States Government remains prepared to assist with a credible, international investigation any way we can, and we will continue to be in touch with all relevant partners as we seek the facts of what happened today.

[source : Crash of Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 in Eastern Ukraine, US State Dept,, 17th July 2014]

Four days later at a State Dept daily press briefing, the following discussion occured:
QUESTION: But first just to follow up on this notion of the disclosure potentially of some of our intelligence information or product by way of satisfying the world’s questions about this affair. Perhaps the more apt analogy than 2002-2003 is Adlai Stevenson at the UN where we had a very serious charge that the Soviet Union at that time had installed missiles on Cuba, and we shared our photographic reconnaissance by way of making that point.

Is that the kind of thing you say the Administration’s considering doing here to satisfy the world’s questions about this?

MS. HARF: I would actually compare it to a more recent event, which is when we talked about the chemical weapons use in Syria. That’s something I lived through, so I know more acutely than Adlai Stevenson’s activities at the UN. But on that, there were a lot of questions, and we attempted to, as the days went on, make more information available until we got to a point where we basically put out an intelligence assessment, not – we didn’t put out every piece of information, but we were able to get as much out there. That’s what we’re trying to do right now. Obviously, it’s always a balance.

QUESTION: Some sort of white paper, as we saw in the Syrian conflict?

MS. HARF: I have no idea what that would look like, but we’re trying to put as much information out as possible.

QUESTION: The reason I ask this is because Secretary Kerry himself seemed to me to be rather forward-leaning in his discussion publicly of intelligence product --

MS. HARF: Absolutely.

QUESTION: -- in a way that was inconsistent with the repeated statements we get from podiums like this that we cannot discuss sources and methods. So, for example, he stated, “We ourselves tracked the imagery of the launch of this surface-to-air missile. We have the trajectory recorded. We have the intercepts of their conversations. We know this from voice identification. We have a video.”

MS. HARF: Yeah.

QUESTION: It seems to me that, having displayed so much of that information across the country on various channels yesterday, the Administration should be quite prepared to back that up.

MS. HARF: It’s in no way inconsistent, James. I think the balance we always try to strike is when we can put as much information out publicly without threat to sources and methods. Many times we can’t. That’s not just something we say because it’s fun to say. Having worked in the intelligence community, it is a fact. But in cases like this, in cases like Syria’s chemical weapons, we endeavor to put as much out as possible when we can do so. And that’s why I was making the point that he was quite forward-leaning yesterday, because we believe it’s important.

[source : Daily Press Briefing, US State Dept,, 21st July 2014]

So Harf basically says, "trust us"!

Should we trust the USA who said Iraq was involved in 9/11 and had WMDs?

Should we trust the USA who is implementing the plan for war and regime change in seven countries in five years that General Wesley Clark revealed?

Should we trust the USA who has unleashed the most medieval international cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria as Seymour Hersh revealed in 2007 would happen?

Should we trust the USA who has been waging war against, and executing violent revolutions in, nearly every nation on God's green Earth?

But from all this extensive intelligence and analysis that the USA says it has, and says it wants to make public but for some reason can't, and in the words of John Kerry "enormous" amounts of evidence, what do we get?

We get this.

I would like to draw your attention to the clouds, or lack thereof in this image. Apparently there was quite a lot of cloud in that area that day. There aren't that many in this image.

And why did it take the USA 4 days to collate this image that a schoolboy or girl could conjure up in 10 minutes?

We do have to ask, why is NATO relying on social media and Eliot Higgins so much when Higgins has some kind of secret undisclosed relationship with the warmongering CIA Neocon Atlantic Council?

Perhaps if we ask him really, really nicely then he might expose that relationship?


It takes two to tango but there are a large number of resources available, physical and human, if you want to kill the resulting child.

Here are the reported number of abortions that have been performed in the UK between 2002 and 2013 inclusive (data from the ONS):

We implemented police state laws over the London bombings of July 2005. Less than 60 people died in that attack. Yet every year we kill nearly 200,000 defenceless children.

And at the same time our education system propagates the myth that Germany started World War 1.

Should we as a nation be proud of ourselves over this?

Thursday, April 16, 2015


Shove your Brief Encounter and Lawrence of Arabia up your arse.

We need many more films like Hidden Agenda by Ken Loach.

The film ends with this quote:
It is like layers of an onion, and the more you peel them away the more you feel like crying. There are two laws running this country: one for the security services and one for the rest of us. - James Miller, ex-MI5 agent

Knowing what we know now about Kincora, Savile, Cyril Smith, etc, what do you think about that?

The problem with Hidden Agenda, as the above quote states, is that it only scratches the surface.

But the even bigger problem is that we all know it but most of us prefer to look the other way and ignore it and ostracise those trying to do something about it!!


In the articles by Akkermans on Ukraine that I can find he does not expose the Nazism of the junta.


Higgins has tweeted this:

Three much bigger lies by omission by Higgins are:
1. refusing to expose the plan for war and regime change in seven countries in five years, and the subsequent unleashing of international cutthroat Jihadis by the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia onto Syria, Lebanon and Iran;
2. refusing to reveal the exact relationship that he has with the warmongering CIA Neocon Atlantic Council;
3. refusing to expose that NATO/EU/IMF unleashed neo Nazis onto Ukraine to kick out Yanukovich in a violent NATO-sponsored neo-Nazi coup because Yanukovich had decided to sign a deal with Russia instead of with the EU, which led to the violence in the East Ukraine and ultimately MH17 whoever or whatever brought it down.


Jeroen Akkermans, the man who allegedly removes potentially damning evidence from a crime scene without any concerns, has tweeted this:

Do you want to know what else is wrong?

Removing potentially damning evidence from a crime scene and holding onto it for months and having it analysed without telling the proper investigating authorities until you are given the conclusions you paid for.


And the MH17 JIT have expressed their scepticism of this evidence. So why are the BBC, the same BBC who:
1. don't tell us the plan for war and regime change in seven countries in five years;
2. portrayed the Kiev Nazis as saints as they shot protestors and police in Maidan and burned people alive in Odessa;
now allowing Akkermans to write all this? And now?


At least 1075!!!

Canada will join a training mission to help Ukraine's military in its struggle against Russian-backed rebels, Prime Minister Stephen Harper said Tuesday, following months of requests for assistance from Ukraine's government.

Starting this summer, roughly 200 troops will be deployed, until March, 2017, to help develop and deliver training for Ukrainian forces personnel.

...Canada's British and American allies are already conducting training missions in Ukraine.

The U.S. has deployed 800 troops to train three — possibly four — battalions in western Ukraine, and the British recently sent 75 soldiers to give instruction in command procedures, tactical intelligence and battlefield first aid.

Canada will only be dealing with recognized Ukrainian government forces and not the kind of ad hoc militias that emerged earlier in the conflict, Kenney said.

[source : Ukraine crisis: Canada sending 200 trainers for Ukraine military, CBC,, 14th April 2015]

Those "ad hoc militias" are actually bona fide Nazis who burn people alive!!!

And you can add to that 1075 all the mercs and the spooks.


Higgins has tweeted this:

It's about Jeroen Akkermans and his mysterious shrapnel. Akkermans claims to have found some fragments from the crash site of MH17, taken them away, smuggled them through customs, and had them analysed. The analysts concluded that the fragments were shrapnel from a missile, possibly a BUK missile.

So let's just go through all that again, just to make sure we are absolutely clear what Akkermans has done.

Akkermans claims to have found fragments at a crash site, a crime scene. But rather than inform the investigating authorities where those fragments were so that they could gather the evidence themselves, and/or collecting the fragments and handing them over to the investigating authorities, Akkermans allegedly removed those fragments from the crime scene.

Akkermans then somehow smuggled them through customs and had them analysed by 2 different sets of analysts. Did he pay the analysts for their services? Why did he choose the analysts he selected?

And only a few months later, after the analysts had concluded that the fragments were possibly shrapnel from a BUK missile, did Akkermans tell the investigating authorities.

If this evidence was submitted in a court of law in a proper trial Akkermans would be laughed out of court.

There is no chain of custody.

I could be given some rusty fragments of an air-to-air missile, then say that I found those fragments at the crash site, pay someone to analyse the fragments, and the analysts would say it was shrapnel from an air-to-air missile, but because I said I found the fragments at the crash site and removed them, instead of telling the investigating authorities, the conclusion of the NATO media would be that an air-to-air missile downed MH17.

See. It's dead easy.


Belling Cat have won a prize.

Their prize is apparently for pinning blame for Ghouta on President Assad and for pinning the blame for MH17 on Russia, none of which have been proven in a court of law.

Eliot Higgins, born in 1979, is the founder and pioneer of the network platform Bellingcat. Bloggers and citizen journalists. With his team and many searchers worldwide, it evaluates daily from hundreds of data and video. His analysis brought to light a lot, followed by numerous newspapers and media, could be based in Germany: for example, the use of cluster bombs and chemical weapons by the Syrian regime and the participation of the Russian Buk missile system during the launch of the Air Malaysia airliner MH17.

[source : Google translation of:

This is such a NATO farce.

The real reason Belling Cat have won this prize is for keeping their mouths shut on:
1. their relationship with the warmongering CIA Neocon Atlantic Council;
2. the plan for war and regime change in seven countries in five years;

Wednesday, April 15, 2015


Here's a film we don't see much of these days: The Parallax View.

Warren Beatty stars as an investigative journalist who infiltrates a 'corporation' who recruits lone nuts to become assassins or useful in other ways. Beatty becomes a bit more involved than he would like, and becomes a patsy for an assassination and is killed himself (a warning to others, perhaps?). Loosely referencing the assassinations of JFK and RFK, this thriller is from a genre we don't see much of these days.


The Green Party Manifesto doesn't look too bad either, apart from a handful of policies.

Excellent policies include:
financial trading tax;
money created by public authority accountable to Parliament;
scrap zero-hour contracts and interns;
cancel Trident.

Questionable policies include:
35 hour week (is this an unbreakable maximum?)
no mention of the monarchy, thus implying it will be retained (even though they without question engineered WW1, their Zionist agents engineered WW2 and they have a very friendly relationship with the head-chopping Saudis who were involved in 9/11 and have supplied the finance for the international cutthroat Jihadis who are rampaging through North Africa and the Middle East).


No big surprise here.

Because as I pointed out in UKRAINE WILL JOIN NATO, in 2008 the following was stated by NATO in a summit communique:
23. NATO welcomes Ukraine’s and Georgia’s Euro-Atlantic aspirations for membership in NATO. We agreed today that these countries will become members of NATO.

MH17 is just one part of that propaganda.

Another is the cover up in NATO media of the blatant Nazism of the junta who provoked the violence in Maidan that led to Yanukovich fleeing for his life from his burning office. That Nazism has since become more overt and powerful within the Kiev government.


According to NATO media, Higgins has 'exposed' Assad and has 'exposed' Putin. But curiously neither he nor that same NATO media is keen for him to expose his relationship with the warmongering CIA Neocon Atlantic Council, based in America (fuck yeah!).

Anyway, have you seen this?

Tuesday, April 14, 2015


Cameron gets serenaded in Berwick-upon-Tweed.


Yesterday was quite a significant day for news to show just how insanely paranoid NATO is.

Islamic State recently threatened to burn the USA like 9/11.
The ISIL terrorist group has threatened to “burn the United States again" by conducting terrorist attacks against the country similar to the September, 11, 2001 attacks in New York City and the Washington, DC.

The Takfiri terrorist organization released a propaganda video on Saturday via the Internet titled “We Will Burn America”, warning that Americans are not safe anywhere in the world.

“America thinks it’s safe because of the geographical location,” a voice-over in the video says. “But the dream of Americans to have safety became a mirage.”

"Today there is no safety for any American on the globe," the voice adds, while showing footage of planes crashing into the World Trade Center in New York City as well as acts of savagery by the group in Iraq and Syria.

[source : ISIL threatens to ‘burn America’ like 9/11, Press TV,, 13th April 2015]

You remember 9/11 don't you? When, after flying unimpeded around the American skies for nearly 2 hours, some planes flew into the WTC 1 and WTC 2 and even The Pentagon? And after that the USA went to war on Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and covertly Syria?

Well, what would any normal sane government do if they received threats to repeat 9/11 against them? You would expect such a government to slap anyone making such a threat on the list of international terrorists.

But are Islamic State different from Al Qaeda? There are arguments that Islamic State did grow out of al Qaeda in Iraq. But not so long ago al Qaeda distanced itself from Islamic State saying that IS was too brutal even for them.

One year ago, al-Qaeda formally announced its separation from the Iraq and Syria affiliate, deeming the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) too radical for its standards. From there, the Islamist militant group stood alone.

It's shocking to think that in just one year, the Islamic State has caused such upheaval — sending videos of beheadings, massacring thousands of people, actions so brutal that international forces launched an offensive against the militant group.

[source : The Islamic State was dumped by al-Qaeda a year ago. Look where it is now., Washington Post,, 3rd February 2015]

So if al Qaeda and Islamic State are separate entities now then should Islamic State be placed on the list of terrorists as a separate entity?

Russia and Syria think so, but the USA, UK, France and Jordan think not, instead arguing that IS still remains as part of al Qaeda even though the spider in my bathroom knows they are separate and IS has threatened to do another 9/11 against the USA.
Russia says the United States, Britain, France, and Jordan have rejected Syria’s proposal to add ISIL to the United Nations Security Council’s sanctions list as a separate terrorist group.

"In the UN Security Council's Al-Qaida Sanctions Committee, the United States, Britain, France, and Jordan have blocked Syria’s request supported by Russia to include the Islamic State (ISIL) terrorist group in the sanctions list as a separate group," read the statement issued by the Russian Foreign Ministry on Friday.

According to reports, ISIL Takfiri terrorist group is currently mentioned as al-Qaida in Iraq (AQI) in the UN’s sanctions list.

Moscow, however, said such naming fails to “reflect the true state of affairs” in Syria and Iraq, adding that the terrorist group did not evolve as a branch of al-Qaeda, but was funded and supported by the US and its allies.

"This position has an obvious political motivation - to disclaim responsibility for the growing scale of Islamic State's (ISIL) activities and prove that it is not a new entity that has been brought into existence by the implementation of plans to depose Syrian President Bashar al-Assad but the former al-Qaida in Iraq,” the statement added.

The four countries’ decision shows that “the anti-Assad coalition bears no moral or political responsibility” for the creation of ISIL, the Russian Foreign Ministry said.

Moscow also lashed out at Washington for the emergence of extremist groups in Iraq.

"It won't hurt to mention that AQI owes its emergence to the US invasion of Iraq in 2003," the statement added.
[source : US, Britain, France, Jordan refuse to name ISIL as separate terror group, Press TV,, 10th April 2015]

So if Islamic State were dumped by al Qaeda and are now a separate entity then why are we not recognising this?

And remember that incident last October when Sweden was hunting a submarine in the channels near Stockholm? The NATO media were repeating that the alleged submarine was Russian. But guess what: it was just a "workboat".
The unknown foreign vessel the Swedish Navy searched for near Stockholm last autumn was actually a “workboat,” a senior navy official says. Local media had alleged a hunt was on to try and find a Russian submarine, which was believed to be in the area.

Swedish Rear Admiral Anders Grenstad told the Swedish TT news agency on Saturday that what was thought to be a vessel or a foreign submarine was actually just a “workboat.”

The Swedish Navy changed the wording from “probable submarine” to “non-submarine” when referring to the reconnaissance mission connected to the unidentified vessel spotted in the Stockholm archipelago.

The massive hunt was used by the Swedish Defense Ministry to justify a six billion kronor ($696 million) hike in defense spending between 2016 and 2020.

[source : Sweden confirms mystery ‘Russian sub’…was in fact a workboat, RT,, 14th April 2015]

But that didn't stop The Guardian at the time pushing for Sweden to join NATO!
There is an element of farce about the latest submarine hunt in the Stockholm archipelago. A Russian miniature submarine is being pursued by the miniature Swedish navy: 20 years of steady bipartisan cuts to Sweden’s defence budget mean that there is no longer a single helicopter equipped for anti-submarine warfare, and many of the boats involved in the hunt are inflatable.

...Embarrassment lies in store whether this intelligence operation finds anything or not. The only question is who will be most embarrassed. The Russians cannot have meant this particular incursion as a signal, since it was meant to stay secret. If the Swedes succeed in finding and rescuing the submarine, the Russians will look like blundering bullies. If, on the other hand, the Swedes fail, it will be more difficult even for them to believe that their armed forces play any great part in ensuring the security of their country. In the long run, the logic of Sweden’s geostrategic position makes Nato membership almost inevitable. This incursion, coming so soon after the invasion of the Crimea and Ukraine, should help to make the point clear.

[source : The Guardian view on Sweden’s defences: is Nato inevitable?, The Guardian Editorial,, 20th October 2014]

Throughout that editorial the assumption was that the phantom vessel was indeed a Russian submarine. But it was just a "workboat".

Talk about propaganda!!


Iraq (2003)

Lebanon (2006)

Libya (2011)

Syria (2011 - )

Constant threats against Iran.

Sunday, April 12, 2015



Home of The Atlantic Council.

Fuck yeah!

ps I promise. I will never die.


All week I've been baiting him, but he still won't tell us. He may or may not have responded indirectly to my MH17 posts, which is strange considering he is travelling and speaking all over the world about Russian propaganda and issuing reports accusing Russia and Syria of crimes while ignoring the Atlantic Council elephant in the Higgins living room, which is the plan revealed to General Wesley Clark of war and regime change in seven countries in five years.

So I'll ask directly and nicely:

Eliot Higgins, what the fuck is your relationship with the warmongering CIA-Neocon Atlantic Council?

Saturday, April 11, 2015


This video of the MH17 crash is the closest and sharpest yet and was taken very quickly after MH17 crashed, but again there is no vapour trail visible, even though instinctively, as in other videos, the cameraman looks up and around and zooms in and out.





Here is what Rand Paul says about Israel, the source of 9/11 and all the wars since:
I’m proud to support Israel, America’s longtime friend and ally in the Middle East.

Israeli cafés and buses are bombed, towns are victimized by hundreds of rockets, and its citizens are attacked by Palestinian terrorists.

It’s time we took a stand for Israel by standing up to the enemies of Israel, the enemies that murder Israeli citizens.

That’s why I proposed a bill called the “Stand with Israel Act” to cut off the flow of U.S. taxpayer dollars to the Palestinian Authority.

As long as the Palestinian Authority is allied with Hamas not one more tax dollar should flow to them.

[source : Rand Paul Stands With Israel, Rand Paul 2016,, Accessed 11th April 2015]

Rand has taken "The Pledge".


In Belling Cat's report MH17 : Source of the Separatists' BUK there is a whole chapter dedicated to identifying the BUK that was allegedly seen being transported through separatist-controlled territory on 17th July 2014. That BUK was labeled BUK 3X2 because it looks like the numbers were clumsily painted over and just the middle number is unreadable.

On 5th January this year Belling Cat issued a report that 312 was in the hands of Ukraine Armed Forces.

A report out today by Oliver Fehr entitled About the Buk 312 who allegedly shot down MH17 shows "BUKs 321, 332 and 312, being transported [west] away from Donetsk city area by UAF on March 19, 2014." There were reports that on 29th June the separatists had taken control of the A-1402 regiment's barracks in Donetsk along with their BUKs, but Ukraine said they had withdrawn all BUKs from there by then.

However, this all suggests that BUKs 332 and 312 were in the hands of the UAF.

That leaves BUKs 322 and 302.

So what of BUK 322?

Here is what Soros-funded Aric Toler of Belling Cat tweeted on 5th February 2015.

Which leaves BUK 302, if it exists.

But in another Belling Cat report Geolocating the MH17 Buk Convoy in Russia a commenter called Alex Livesy states that BUK's 312 and...BUK 302 are owned by Ukraine!!! BUK 312 is confirmed by Belling Cat and Fehr.

So is BUK 302 owned by Ukraine?

The video in the Fehr report shows that BUKs 332 and 312 are Ukraine. Toler says BUK 322 is not the BUK. And now BUK 302 is Ukraine too?

So where does that leave Belling Cat?


Below is the proposed position of a BUK belonging to the Ukraine Armed Forces on 17th July 2014.

This was found from the coordinates given on one of the images released by the Russian MoD at their press conference on 21st July 2014.

The time given is 1132 but no time zone is given.

You will see that in the above photo there are 3 proposed components of the BUK battery. I have also looked on Google Earth at the other sites whose coordinates are given in satellite images presented at that conference and they show activity around 17th July 2014. This one in particular definitely does look like it was a military base around 17th July 2014 on Google Maps.

On 25th July, 4 days after the Russian MoD press conference at which these photos were released, Paris Match published its now infamous photo of a BUK on a red trailer being pulled by that Volvo cabin between Donetsk and Torez.

So my questions are:
1. if in the first photo those units really are components of a BUK battery, and the image was taken on 17th July 2014, then how did they get there and when? Would it be possible to transport them through Donetsk or from the south?
2. if in the first photo that alleged BUK battery was given to the separatists by Russia then would Russia point out their location on 17th July 2014?
3. what did the residents of Zaroshchens'ke, just north of the S bend in the first photo, see on 17th July 2014?


The Trades Unionist and Socialist Coalition (TUSC) opened their election campaign yesterday. Their manifesto is more radical than Labour but is still not radical enough for me, and includes some policies that I would question, but that number is less than a handful.

So in addition to the TUSC manifesto I would also:
1. tax the hell out of The City of London with an at least 1% financial trading tax;
2. bring money creation and supply into public hands and create money to improve society not for the benefit of a cabal of parasites;
3. abolish the British monarchy;
4. abolish Freemasonry;
5. create a special task force to hunt down and bring to trial the major instigators of the recent financial crash (and I would give that special task force a clue : Bilderberg);
6 create a special task force to look into the activities of Bilderberg with the aim of trying for treason any attendee who does not confess into what Bilderberg does, how it operates and what their particular role is;
7. outlaw any serving politician from associating with Bilderberg, Trilateral Commission, Bohemian Grove, etc.;
8. create a special history task force to look into how and why World War One really occured.

And that is just for starters.

If you vote red, blue, green, yellow, orange, purple, or any other colour then you will in reality just be voting for one of fifty shades of austerity.

We need to gut our society of the warmongers, the traitors and the parasites and rid ourselves of the Venetian cancer who came here to create that monstrosity called The City of London.


Oops! I almost forgot this:
9. create a truly independent panel to investigate allegations of Whitehall/VIP/Buckingham Palace paedophilia and murder.

Friday, April 10, 2015


Here is the tapes released by the Ukraine Security Service on 18th July which they say were recordings of separatists on the morning of 17th July.

If these tapes are to be believed then the Ukraine Security Service knew for certain that on the morning of 17th July:
1. the separatists had at least one BUK system;
2. the separatists near Marinovka already had a BUK system.

So why did they not alert civilian air traffic control?

BUKs can hit a target at well over 20Km altitude and fly to hit their target for 40Km. MH17 was at 10Km altitude.

And here is another question:
A woman on Zello described herself as being in Oktyabr when she saw a missile fly over her head. She identified the direction of the launch site as Saurivka. But this Oktyabr is actually the village identified as Chervonyi Zhovten on Google Maps that a Reuters reporter recently visited and made stuff up about witnesses seeing missiles. And not only that, Saurivka is SSW of Chervonyi Zhovten but the proposed launch site is east of Chervonyi Zhovten!!!

But this makes it possible that if, repeat if, MH17 was shot down by a BUK then it was shot down by the BUK system at Marinovka, because Marinovka is just 8 Km from Saurivka. But if so then how did the photographer north of Torez see the alleged vapour trail?

And why did the many Kiev Nazis trapped in that area not see the vapour trail?

So again, contradictions, contradictions, contradictions galore.


On 16th July the separatists began to attack the Kiev Nazis at Marynivka, which is just 10 Km from the proposed launch site of the BUK missile that some suggest brought down MH17. The Kiev Nazis repelled the attacks, and so on 17th July the day that MH17 fell out of the sky, Kiev Nazis were just 10 Km from the proposed launch site. Yet not one of them saw the plume of smoke and thus took a photograph of it otherwise we would definitely have heard about it by now. But apparently an anonymous man based north of Torez, 14 Km away from the proposed launch site, and closely connected to the Ukraine Security service allegedly took a photograph of the vapour trail.

Also, on 16th July, the Kiev Nazi Air Force bombed separatists based at the Saur-Mogila monument who were shelling the Kiev Nazis at Marynivka. The Kiev Nazi Air Force also bombed Shnizhne and killed civilians on 15th July. Yet while the battle for Stepanivka raged on 17th July the Kiev Nazi Air Force says it did nothing on 17th July 2014, having bombed separatist positions at Saur Mogila and having bombed Shnizhne killing civilians the days before.

And what's more, on 17th July 2014 the Saur Mogila hill and monument were held by the separatists. The monument is just 5 Km from the proposed launch site and overlooks with a clear view the proposed launch site. I would be very surprised if nobody on that hill didn't see the vapour trail and point it out to their fellow fighters. There have been suggestions in the NATO media that the unit that allegedly shot down MH7 with a BUK have been murdered. I would also suggest that everyone on Saur Mogila hill would have to be murdered too.

[All distances from Google Maps 'Measure distance' facility]

Thursday, April 09, 2015


Teach the ignorant as much as you can; society is culpable in not providing a free education for all and it must answer for the night which it produces. If the soul is left in darkness sins will be committed. The guilty one is not he who commits the sin, but he who causes the darkness.

[source : Les Miserables, Victor Hugo]

And so it is with MH17.

In WHO IS ULTIMATELY TO BLAME FOR MH17? I laid out the evidence that Ukraine has suffered a violent neo-Nazi coup sponsored in part by NATO but definitely covered up by the NATO media. That coup was due to the legitimately elected President Yanukovich being chased out of his burning office following his decision to sign a deal with Russia instead of with the EU/IMF cabal. And we now know, but before only suspected, that the neo Nazis provoked the violence by shooting protestors and police from The Conservatory. East Ukraine recognised this Nazism of the junta and rebelled. This led to the civil war, and ultimately MH17 being shot down, by BUK, fighter jet or both. Without the coup then MH17 would more than likely have not been shot down. And if the NATO media had told the truth about the coup then the British public would not have supported it.

And so it is with the wars in North Africa and the Middle East. They are a plan revealed to General Wesley Clark. Seven nations in five years were to experience war and regime change: Iraq, Iran, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Sudan and Somalia. But by 2007 only Iraq had experienced both, so the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia agreed that the latter would unleash the nastiest international cutthroat Jihadi butchers onto Syria, Lebanon and Iran. But 4 years after these Jiahdis were unleashed onto Syria, and one huge failed false flag at Ghouta designed to provoke a NATO war on Syria, President Assad is still in power. So in the last year the medieval Islamic State was allowed to rise to pose a threat to the whole world. So much so that even Canada is now bombing Syria.

Teach the ignorant as much as you can; society is culpable in not providing a free education for all and it must answer for the night which it produces. If the soul is left in darkness sins will be committed. The guilty one is not he who commits the sin, but he who causes the darkness.


Why aren't people sick to death of war?

Wednesday, April 08, 2015


Below are just some of the videos filmed by several people close to the crash site of MH17, some very, very close indeed. In these videos we:
1. do not see any vapour trail of a BUK missile;
2. do not hear anyone pointing out that they see a vapour trail of a BUK missile.

The vapour trail of a BUK missile can be seen for a number minutes after launch, depending on atmospheric conditions.

At the moment there are just two photographs, taken by the same person, showing a plume of smoke which some say is the vapour trail of a BUK missile. That photographer just happened to have close contacts with the Ukraine Security Service.

So let's recap the evidence for a missile strike on MH17.

The evidence for is two photographs of a plume of smoke which some say is the vapour trail of a BUK missile, but
(a) the photographer had close links to the Ukraine Security Service;
(b) the photographer was 8Km from the alleged launch site;
(c) nobody else took a photograph of this plume smoke even though there are several towns and villages within just a few miles of the alleged launch site, and there were even members of the Ukraine military just a mile or two from the alleged launch site who were fighting in the Battle of Saur-Mogila, none of whom photographed the plume;
(d) a Reuters report on residents in a village seeing the smoke was discredited when one of the interviewees said that Reuters made it all up.

The evidence against consists of:
1. at least 7 eyewitnesses who state on camera that they saw fighter jets close to MH17;
2. several videos (see above) filmed almost immediately after MH17 fell out of the sky which show no vapour trail or people pointing out or shouting that they see a vapour trail.

In addition there are the contradictory 'proofs' from Der Spiegel and Correctiv who state that, based on anonymous eyewitnesses (as opposed to those who state on camera for RT and BBC that they saw fighter jets), a BUK was launched from a field 3Km north of Shnizhne (and if so why did nobody photograph the vapour trail?), and the Ukraine Security Service who within hours of MH17 crashing released a tape of alleged phone intercepts which they said proved 100% beyond doubt that Cossacks based at Chernukino shot down MH17 with a BUK. However, the US State department cannot believe those tapes because according to data collected from their 'sensors' a missile was launched from the Shnizhne area, but instead of releasing the raw data they instead released a simple image of an arc and a straight line intercepting over East Ukraine, an image that a schoolboy could create in a few minutes.

And yes, that is the same US State Department that ran the Arab Spring, and told us that Iraq had WMDs and was involved in 9/11, and that Osama bin Laden had done 9/11 and was hiding out in Afghanistan dragging his kidney dialysis machine behind him as he was allowed to escape from Tora Bora, etc. Their list of lies goes on and on and on...

And we now know that in the Belling Cat team pushing the BUK missile theory:
1. Aric Toler is paid by George Soros;
2. Eliot Higgins is up to something with The Atlantic Council which is run by the Neocon-CIA warmongers.

So the thought for t'day is: why did only one person 8Km away photograph a plume of smoke, but nobody filmed that plume on videos that were obviously filmed just after MH17 came down, and why on those videos is nobody pointing out a plume of smoke, while there are at least 7 eyewitnesses who state on camera that they saw fighter jets?

Tuesday, April 07, 2015


When I posted ELIOT HIGGINS AND THE CIA he mocked me, posting a link to that post in a tweet.

But over the weekend it was revealed that Higgins has been up to something with The Atlantic Council. What that something is I don't know. As far as I know he hasn't said.

But in FAUSTUS HIGGINS SELLS HIS SOUL TO THE ATLANTIC COUNCIL I pointed out just how close to the warmongers Higgins was now.

And regarding specifically the CIA, The Atlantic Council has the following former Directors of the CIA as management:
Michael Hayden (Board member)

Robert Gates (Honorary Director)
Leon Panetta (Honorary Director)
William Webster (Honorary Director)

And not only that, there is a former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff in Michael Mullen, a couple of US Secretaries of Defense, and war criminal Henry Kissinger in there too.

I think Higgins needs to tell us all, come clean, what he has been doing and plans to do with or for The CIA Atlantic Council.


Here I humbly suggest a policy guaranteed to win votes from all sections of society. All except one, that is.

That policy is to tax the City of London with an at least 1% financial trading tax.

This can be implemented easily and immediately and thus raise large revenues easily and immediately. Those revenues can then be put to work to rebuild Great Britain for the British people not the Venetian bankers who have usurped our sovereignty by creating that legal anomaly, The City of London.

But for whatever reason the mainstream parties are not proposing this effective and easily implementable policy.


Because they are either owned or scared.

Vote Labour, LibDem, Tory, Green, UKIP. It doesn't matter what colour you vote for you will get austerity. We are being given the opportunity to vote for one of 50 shades of austerity to bail out the banks.

Tax The City of London and there will be no austerity. And it will also send a message to the City of London: we haven't forgotten and we're comin' to get you.

And if the bankers leave The City of London then I say good riddance. We don't need them. They, the parasites, need us much, much more than we need them.

A 1% financial trading tax on the City of London, the bastards who have just fucked us all.

It's easy.


Monday, April 06, 2015


The BOG is the Banker Occupied Government (BOG).


A "critical and dangerous situation".

That is how the Ukraine Foreign Minister in July 2014 described to a Dutch diplomat the situation in East Ukraine.

As I have pointed out several times, on 14th July a Ukraine Air Force Antonov An 26 was shot out of the sky as it approached Luhansk Airport on 14th July. The separatists claimed they shot it down with a BUK. At that time the Ukraine Armed Forces on the ground were trying to create a corridor south of Luhansk to Luhansk Airport to relieve UAF trapped there. Ukraine told the Dutch government just how dangerous the situation was.
The Dutch government knew three days before the crash of the MH17 that a cargo plane of the Ukrainian army at high altitude in the sky was shot with Russian military equipment. This is evident from the report of a Dutch diplomat who was on July 14, 2014 at a briefing of the Ukrainian government on the security situation in the country.

The report of the diplomat is in possession of the radio program Argos that the afternoon has been made public. The government refused until now to reveal the report, despite repeated requests from the House to do so.

...To the report of the briefing in Kiev was rather a lot to do because many parties in the House wondered if the [Dutch] government following the briefing did not have to take more action. The diplomat was told by Ukrainian Foreign Minister that there was a "critical and dangerous situation" in eastern Ukraine arise. The tearing down of the cargo plane with a missile called the minister "the latest example" thereof.

Following the briefing, the Dutch government increased the minimum flight altitude above Ukraine to 9.7 kilometers. In the Chamber sounded after the disaster MH17, where 298 people were killed, whether the government should not have forbid airlines to fly over eastern Ukraine.

[source : Google translation of: ‘Regering wist dat Antonov werd neergeschoten met Russische raket’, NRC,, 4th April 2015]

So, let us assume for a moment that the separatists did shoot MH17 with a BUK. My question is: if on 17th July 2014
1. the Kiev Nazis knew the separatists had a BUK because one had been used to shoot down an Antonov An 26 on 14th July;
2. the Dutch had been told the situation over East Ukraine was "critical and dangerous";
3. the Kiev Nazi Air Force was flying fighter jets close to MH17, as stated on camera by at least 7 eyewitnesses;

then who would be guilty?

Is this situation very similar to knowing that a mad axe murderer is rampaging through the streets with a very sharp axe and not telling anyone? And then using any resulting murder to your benefit?

Why did Ukraine not shut down their airspace completely? The airspace over Crimea had been shut down.

Why did Ukraine fly fighter jets close to MH17?

Atlantic Council Boy is 'spinning' this revelation about the Dutch government being told that the equivalent of a mad axe murderer was rampaging through the streets of Amsterdam with a very sharp axe:

Is this why there are allegations that the Dutch government wasn't interested in getting to the bottom of the mystery? (see DUTCH INTELLIGENCE IS OBSTRUCTING MH17 INVESTIGATION).

Why have the Dutch kept this secret for so long?

I have already raised my suspicion that of all the flights that flew over East Ukraine, the one civilian plane that was shot down just happened to lead to The Netherlands being in charge of the investigation, when The Netherlands was one of the initial five founders of NATO, NATO wants Ukraine as a member and the putschists in Ukraine want Ukraine to join NATO.

This evidence, which is being spun by Atlantic Council Boy, supports the theory that someone in NATO wanted MH17 shot down to lead to an investigation that NATO would control and thus lead to the conclusion that Russia shot down MH17.

And to add to the mystery, here is an interesting theory as to why the Kiev Nazis were flying fighter jets close to MH17, as stated on camera by at least 7 eyewitnesses. In June 2014, a month before MH17 came down, NATO ran electronic warfare exercises involving spoofing radar systems into thinking a civilian passenger plane, such as MH17, was actually a military plane. Apparently the exercises were successful, and caused a great deal of trouble to civilian air traffic control at the time.

But be warned. This theory is from Adam Curry. Curry's uncle Donald Gregg was big in the CIA and in implementing US foreign policy.

And on 17th July, NATO was running the electronic warfare exercise BREEZE 2014 in the Black Sea, not that far from Shnizhne. And recall that during this time, the Ukraine military radar systems showed increased activity.

But let's not forget: no guilt has been decided or proved yet. There are a wide range of theories on MH17, supported by evidence. To just blindly focus on one theory which leads to sanctions on and friction with a nation with a massive nuclear arsenal is dangerous.

Sunday, April 05, 2015


I watched Spielberg's Lincoln last night. Lincoln was let down by several leaders of the Union forces. It wasn't until Sherman and Grant got going that the Union began to kick Confederate ass. Anyway, the Union eventually won. And Lincoln was very cunning in his attempt to eventually outlaw slavery in the USA.

This is what Lincoln said in his inauguration speech of 4th March 1865:

At this second appearing to take the oath of the Presidential office there is less occasion for an extended address than there was at the first. Then a statement somewhat in detail of a course to be pursued seemed fitting and proper. Now, at the expiration of four years, during which public declarations have been constantly called forth on every point and phase of the great contest which still absorbs the attention and engrosses the energies of the nation, little that is new could be presented. The progress of our arms, upon which all else chiefly depends, is as well known to the public as to myself, and it is, I trust, reasonably satisfactory and encouraging to all. With high hope for the future, no prediction in regard to it is ventured.

On the occasion corresponding to this four years ago all thoughts were anxiously directed to an impending civil war. All dreaded it, all sought to avert it. While the inaugural address was being delivered from this place, devoted altogether to saving the Union without war, insurgent agents were in the city seeking to destroy it without war--seeking to dissolve the Union and divide effects by negotiation. Both parties deprecated war, but one of them would make war rather than let the nation survive, and the other would accept war rather than let it perish, and the war came.

One-eighth of the whole population were colored slaves, not distributed generally over the Union, but localized in the southern part of it. These slaves constituted a peculiar and powerful interest. All knew that this interest was somehow the cause of the war. To strengthen, perpetuate, and extend this interest was the object for which the insurgents would rend the Union even by war, while the Government claimed no right to do more than to restrict the territorial enlargement of it. Neither party expected for the war the magnitude or the duration which it has already attained. Neither anticipated that the cause of the conflict might cease with or even before the conflict itself should cease. Each looked for an easier triumph, and a result less fundamental and astounding. Both read the same Bible and pray to the same God, and each invokes His aid against the other. It may seem strange that any men should dare to ask a just God's assistance in wringing their bread from the sweat of other men's faces, but let us judge not, that we be not judged. The prayers of both could not be answered. That of neither has been answered fully. The Almighty has His own purposes. "Woe unto the world because of offenses; for it must needs be that offenses come, but woe to that man by whom the offense cometh." If we shall suppose that American slavery is one of those offenses which, in the providence of God, must needs come, but which, having continued through His appointed time, He now wills to remove, and that He gives to both North and South this terrible war as the woe due to those by whom the offense came, shall we discern therein any departure from those divine attributes which the believers in a living God always ascribe to Him? Fondly do we hope, fervently do we pray, that this mighty scourge of war may speedily pass away. Yet, if God wills that it continue until all the wealth piled by the bondsman's two hundred and fifty years of unrequited toil shall be sunk, and until every drop of blood drawn with the lash shall be paid by another drawn with the sword, as was said three thousand years ago, so still it must be said "the judgments of the Lord are true and righteous altogether."

With malice toward none, with charity for all, with firmness in the right as God gives us to see the right, let us strive on to finish the work we are in, to bind up the nation's wounds, to care for him who shall have borne the battle and for his widow and his orphan, to do all which may achieve and cherish a just and lasting peace among ourselves and with all nations.

Lincoln was assassinated by a nest of British operatives just a few weeks later.


It looks like Eliot Higgins may have just sold his soul to The Atlantic Council.

The say what Council?

The Atlantic Council, arguably the most dangerous cabal of warmongers you could ever meet.

The man in the above photo to Higgins' right is Maksymilian Czuperski, Special Assistant to the President and CEO of The Atlantic Council, Frederick Kempe.

Now, Kempe doesn't seem to be that dangerous. A quick search reveals that he is a member of the CFR, but nothing more than that.


It is who 'advises' and 'directs' The Atlantic Council that Faustus Higgins should be very, very concerned about.

Standout members of the Advisory Board are:

H.E. Carl Bildt, Former Prime Minister and Minister for Foreign Affairs of Sweden [Bilderberg]

Dr. Zbigniew Brzezinski, Former National Security Advisor to US President Jimmy Carter [Bilderberg, founder of al Qaeda and professional Russia-hater]

Dr. Thomas Enders, President and CEO, Airbus Group [Bilderberg]

Ms. Marillyn A. Hewson, Chairman and CEO, Lockheed Martin Corporation [Military-Industrial Complex]

Mr. Rupert Murdoch, Executive Chairman, 21st Century Fox [Bilderberg]

Mr. Paul Polman, CEO, Unilever [Bilderberg]

The Rt. Hon. Lord Robertson of Port Ellen, Former Secretary General of NATO [Bilderberg]

Mr. Stephen A. Schwarzman, Chairman, CEO, and Co-Founder, The Blackstone Group [Skull & Bones]

Mr. James C. Smith, President and CEO, Thomson Reuters [Reuters were just caught out lying about MH17]

Sir Martin Sorrell, Group Chief Executive, WPP Group PLC [Knight of the kiddie-fiddling Realm, Trilateral Commission]

Dr. Lawrence Summers, Former Director, National Economic Council [Bilderberg, the man who pushed the Gramm–Leach–Bliley Act that led to the recent global financial disaster]

Mr. Jacob Wallenberg, Chairman, Investor AB [Bilderberg]

Mr. John S. Watson, Chairman and CEO, Chevron Corporation [Rockefeller]

Mr. Robert B. Zoellick, Chairman, International Advisors, Goldman Sachs [Founding member of Project for New American Century]

Standout members of the board are:
Richard L. Armitage
Nicholas Burns
Wesley K. Clark
Paula J. Dobriansky [PNAC, NED]
Michèle Flournoy
Michael V. Hayden
Zalmay M. Khalilzad
Henry A. Kissinger
Jane Holl Lute
Brent Scowcroft
James Stavridis
Dov S. Zakheim

And the Honorary Directors are:
David C. Acheson
Madeleine K. Albright
James A. Baker, III
Frank C. Carlucci, III
Robert M. Gates
Michael G. Mullen
Leon E. Panetta
William J. Perry
Colin L. Powell
Condoleezza Rice
George P. Shultz
William H. Webster

WTF is Faustus Higgins doing with the Special Assistant to the guy who runs a powerful Neocon warmongering outfit advised and directed by this megalomaniac bloodthirsty lot?!

Friday, April 03, 2015



Russia has already offered financial help to Greece.




If you live in the Essex area then support this fella'. He is the only man with a sensible and easily implementable plan to get us out of the shit that the bankers caused.

Thursday, April 02, 2015


Here are three videos with a total of 7 different people stating on camera that they saw fighter jets close to MH17 when it was shot down.

Video 1:
The first is from the BBC. The BBC pulled the English version so we have to listen to the Spanish version.

At about 0:30 into the video three women state that a fighter jet was close to MH17 when it came down.

Here is a transcript of the witnesses:
Eyewitness 1: There were two explosions in the air. And this is how it broke apart. And the fragments blew apart like this, to the sides. And when

Eyewitness 2: And there was another aircraft, a military one, beside it. Everybody saw it.

Eyewitness 1: Yes, yes. It was flying under it, because it could be seen. It was proceeding underneath, below the civilian one.

Eyewitness 3: There were sounds of an explosion. But they were in the sky. They came from the sky. Then this plane made a sharp turn-around like this. It changed its trajectory and headed in that direction.

Through July and August 2014 there was a battle raging just down the road from the proposed launch site 5 Km south of Shnizhne. That battle was The Battle for Saur-Mogila. I'm surprised that, considering they were just a few miles from the alleged launch site, not one member of the Ukraine military photographed the alleged plume of smoke from Saur-Mogila. Nor did any of the other residents from the surrounding area.

Video 2:
This second video is the Russia Today documentary MH17 : The Untold Story

At about 02:00 a woman describes seeing two planes, one flying off shortly after MH17 came down.

At about 08:10 a man describes seeing "a small military aircraft in the sky" at the time MH17 came down.

Video 3:
The third video is another Russia Today documentary Reflections on MH17.

At about 10:08 a man and a woman describe seeing a fighter jet when MH17 came down.

Now, there is only one photograph of the alleged trail. Only one. Everyone in the area from within several miles of the crash site heard the booms and saw the plane falling from the sky, but they did not see any vapour trail leading from the exploding plane to the launch site. However, as shown above, there are people prepared to go on camera for the whole world to watch and say to the whole world that they saw fighter jets close to MH17 when it came down.

Now, why isn't the MH17 JIT putting out requests for witnesses who saw fighter jets close to MH17?!


So for years Al Qaeda has been rampant in Yemen, so rampant that the USA has been droning the place for years, killing many civilians in that time, provoking many to join al Qaeda and other terrorist organisations. Saudi Arabia played very little part in trying to kill al Qaeda, even though the area that al Qaeda controls in Yemen shares a large border with Saudi Arabia.

But when the Houthis, who are apparently the only Yemen-based force capable of taking on al Qaeda in Yemen, take power, the Saudis rush to war against the Houthis, killing over 60 children in the process.

The Houthis have also allied with President Bashar al-Assad in Syria against the Saudi-sponsored international cutthroat Jihadi butchers who Saudi Arabia, the USA and Israel agreed in 2007 to unleash onto Syria, Lebanon and Iran, and who Roland Dumas was asked to smuggle into Syria by the British in 2009.

Here is Prince Charles getting down with the Saudis last year. They do love their swords, don't they? They even have a sword on their flag! What on earth do they do with all those swords?

Wednesday, April 01, 2015


“uncooperative and obstructive.”?

Weren't they the same words used to describe how the Dutch intelligence service is behaving towards the MH17 JIT?

And with those words came the allegation that the Dutch government is not too keen on finding out what exactly happened to MH17, now that the initial claims are firmly entrenched in the minds of the general public.

Anyway, the Council of Europe has stated that they think the investigation carried out into the Maidan shootings, which provoked the violence that led to Yanukovich fleeing for his life, by the Ukraine Ministry of the Interior was incoherent and inefficient, and that the Ukraine Ministry of the Interior was "uncooperative and obstructive" with their investigation.

Now why would that be?

Because just a few weeks ago the BBC surprisingly ran an interview with someone who claimed that he was one of the snipers on the Conservatory shooting at and killing both protestors and police, and that he was working for the Kiev Nazis. This is backed up by photographic evidence.


Two days ago the MH17 JIT released a call for eyewitnesses to a BUK travelling through separatist-controlled territory. Also in that call were alleged phone calls intercepted by the Ukraine security service.

But how were the Ukraine security services able to intercept those phone calls?

The rebels in eastern Ukraine use the Ukrainian mobile phone network, which can be easily intercepted. In recent months, the SBOE has put on YouTube a large number of these calls.

[source : Google translation of: Russische ex-legerofficier herkend op justitietape MH17, NRC,, 1st April 2015]

So let's think this through.

Imagine you are a separatist, fighting the Kiev Nazis. Would you use the Ukraine public telephone system, to say where you are, using real names, talking about delivery of BUKs from Russia and what you are going to do with them?

And let's assume that you use the public telephone system of Ukraine to communicate. Would you use the word "BUK"? Particularly after MH17 was shot down? Surely they would think of a much more secure system and use code words and keep communications to a minimum. But apparently, if the Ukraine security service is to believed, the separatists spoke quite freely about their plans, using words like "BUK" and "Russia" quite freely.

But if:
1. the separatists use the Ukraine public telephone system (and thus their communications are easily intercepted);
2. and their phone calls and thus plans are easily intercepted by the Ukraine security service,

then why have the Kiev Nazis not been able to defeat the separatists?

If the Kiev Nazis are intercepting the phone calls of the separatists and thus have a pretty good idea of the locations of the separatists and their future plans then how come the Kiev Nazis have been unable to defeat the separatists?

And what's more, the Ukraine security service released tapes of alleged intercepted phone calls shortly after MH17 came down which they said proved 100% beyond doubt that Cossacks at Chernukino shot down MH17. Yet when Der Spiegel and Correctiv released parallel reports in January this year which suggested that, based on 'eyewitness' statements, MH17 was shot down from a field 3 Km north of Shnizhne, the Ukraine Ministry of Foreign Affairs fully backed those reports, thus implying that they, the Ukraine Ministry of Foreign Affairs, do not trust the Ukraine security service!

Just how pathetic are the Kiev Nazis?

They can't beat an opponent whose every move they know in advance because they are intercepting their phone calls and their opponents are apparently quite willing to talk openly and freely about their plans on that public phone network, their own government doesn't trust them, and when they release alleged intercepts suggesting that Cossacks based at Chernukino shot down MH17, nobody believes them, not even the USA, who released an image (not the alleged raw data) of an arc originating at Shnizhne and a straight line intercepting over Hrabove.

And regarding this:

The CIA may or may not pay Toler. I don't know.

But he is paid by George Soros through RuNet Echo, which is funded by The Open Society Institute.

And where did Soros get his fortune from? Soros was allowed to run the Pound Sterling down in 1992. This was agreed beforehand with the British Monarchy. Soros has since survived (suggesting it was all a scam) and has since become big in Bilderberg. So it was all a scam.


New evidence of intercepted phone calls has been released by the trustworthy Ukraine Security Service. The translated transcript is as follows:

Mumble mumble mumble.
Mumble mumble mumble.
Mumble mumble mumble.
Mumble mumble mumble.
Mumble mumble mumble.

This conversation resembles those recently released by the JIT so much that it is believed that the same people wrote the script for all of them.

Tuesday, March 31, 2015


It's a small village. There's a ceasefire. They can be there tomorrow.

Why don't they get down there and knock on a few doors, ask a few residents themselves?

Do they really want to know?

There were four residents of Chervonyi Zhovten that Reuters allegedly spoke to:
Valentina Kovalenko;
Her daughter Anastasia Kovalenko;
Olga Krasilnikova;
Pyotr Fedotov.

We now understand that there is some doubt about Fedotov's interview, and Reuters don't seem to be in a hurry to show their interview of him.

So that leaves the other three, who we can assume know about what was said in the article, and may well have been talking to each other.

Did RT speak to them?

Monday, March 30, 2015


In its report on the release today of a video by the JIT requesting witnesses to a BUK being transported through East Ukraine, Reuters refers to the report that is disputed by Russia Today. In that initial Reuters report Pytor Fedotov is claimed to have said that he saw the missile wiggling as it flew over his head when he was in his garden in a village south of Shnizhne.

Villagers in eastern Ukraine told Reuters earlier this year they saw a missile flying directly overhead just before flight MH17 was shot out of the sky, providing the most detailed accounts to date that suggest the rocket was launched from territory held by pro-Russian rebels.

[source : Dutch MH17 crash investigation focuses on Russian missile theory, Reuters,, 30th March 2015]

But today Russia Today has reported that Fedotov has told them that he did not say this and that Fedotov says the Reuters report is "mere fantasy".

To help to clarify the situation Russia Today has asked Reuters and the reporter to provide the the raw footage of the interview, which Reuters has so far not done.

And on those intercepts in that video released by the JIT: are they having a laugh?

They mention BUK and Russia, as if the people speaking were actually trying to implicate themselves!!

And as for the proposed route as to how the BUK got from Shnizhne to Luhansk, the BUK would have had to travel through territory occupied by the Kiev Nazis!!! That area south and west of Luhansk was either occupied by Kiev Nazis or was a war zone as the Kiev Nazis tried to create a corridor to Luhansk airport.


These are not my words (though I do think they are true).

These are the words of the Dutch team investigating MH17.

The Dutch public prosecution underlines that, despite the release of this information, there is still no irrefutable proof that explains the crash. “It is too early to be drawing any conclusions regarding the cause of the crash.” The investigation team is researching another scenario, in which MH17 was the target of an airborne assault. Two other scenarios, a terrorist attack and technical failure, have been ruled out.

[source : Strong evidence found of separatist involvement in downing of MH17, NRC,, 30th March 2015]

So they still haven't ruled out "an airborne assault".

I'm not surprised about that with all the eyewitnesses who have stated on camera, some within minutes of MH17 coming down, that they saw fighter jets close to MH17 when it came down.

But note in the RCL report these statements:
The missile’s smoke trail was photographed from Torez and the electronic communication between the missile and its launcher was supposedly registered as well.

Regarding the claim about the smoke trail, it has not been proved that it was THE smoke trail. This is only a belief of some.

And regarding the claim that the electronic communications were registered, I assume that this was made by the 'sensors' that the USA says it has, the data from which has not been released, but they did release an image of an arc and a straight line intercepting over Shnizhne, an image a schoolkid could knock up in 30 seconds. Why not release the raw data?

And regarding Jeroen Akkermans, he violated all criminal and journalistic protocol and claims to have removed a piece of evidence that he allegedly found at a crime scene, he did not notify the investigating authorities until months later when some one who was paid to provide an opinion said that the evidence belonged to a BUK.