Tuesday, October 06, 2015


For millenia, the continent we know as North America was occupied by native Americans.

But after 1604, things started to go really downhill for the native Americans, as white settlers came from Europe, to settle, to farm the land, to trade, and to eventually ethnically cleanse the native Americans in order to take their lands.

Sweden was one of many nations that supplied immigrants into the United States, well over a million :
Immigration to the United States in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries was a part of the economic and social transformation that affected both Europe and North America, when between 1850 and 1950 some fifty million Europeans settled in non-European areas. The mass exodus of some 1.3 million Swedes to the United States, often young and healthy men and women, during the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries was due to the economic and social circumstances in Sweden.

...Minnesota became the most Swedish of all states, with Swedish-Americans constituting more than 12 percent of Minnesota's population in 1910. In some areas, such as Chisago or Isanti counties on the Minnesota countryside north and northwest of Minneapolis, Swedish-Americans made up close to 70 percent of the population. If Minnesota became the most Swedish state in the union, the city of Chicago, was the Swedish-American capital. In 1910, more than 100,000 Swedish-Americans resided in Chicago, which meant that about 10 percent of all Swedish-Americans lived there. At the turn of the century, Chicago was also the second largest Swedish city in the world; only Stockholm had more Swedish inhabitants than Chicago.

[source : Swedish Immigration to North America, Swenson Swedish Immigration Research Center, Augustana College, https://www.augustana.edu/general-information/swenson-center-/swedish-american-immigration-history, Accessed 6t October 2015]

So the challenge for all those anti-immigrant persons out there is: what ever happened to the native Americans of Minnesota? (Clue: they were slaughtered.)


After reading the post below, WHO WAS PRESIDENT ANDREW JACKSON, we can now sincerely ask the following questions:

Can the worship of President Andrew Jackson be classified as a mental illness?

Or is just straight up lazy, racist white supremacy?


According to Libertarians, President Andrew Jackson was a dreamy dream of a hero. Jackson fought the British at New Orleans and won a decisive battle for the United States. Jackson then destroyed the Second Bank of the United States because it was a privately owned central bank which could not be trusted because of the amount of foreign investors in the bank.

All this, Libertarians claim, makes Jackson a hero.

Libertarians got all this from two authors, Eustace Mullins and G Edward Griffin, both considered untouchable sacred cows in Conspiracyland.

But who was Jackson, really?

Well what I am about to tell you will make your toes curl at the naivete and laziness of Libertarians for falling for what I believe is a British intelligence propaganda operation.

First I will tell you straight up what Jackson was: a slaveholding, racist, treasonous scumbag.

You want proof?

Well, here goes.

Jackson was a planter and slaveholder

Jackson's plantation, The Hermitage, was 1000 acres, and when he died he owned 150 slaves, having started out with just 9. Though considered one of the more reasonable slaveholders, Jackson would have his slaves beaten for running away or impudence.

Negro Fort

Fugitive slaves from the Southern states found sanctuary in what was called Negro Fort, an old fort from the War of 1812 built on the banks of the Apalachicola River. These fugitive slaves and the Seminoles formed a colony from persecution and return to slavery. But then along comes Andrew Jackson, who ran a campaign against the fort to return fugitive slaves back to their 'rightful owners'. Jackson offered $50 for each returned slave. During an attack on the fort a loose cannonball hit the fort's arsenal and killed 300 occupants of the fort.

Burr and Treason

Jackson was involved in treason against the United States. After assassinating Alexander Hamilton, who Libertarians hate, Aaron Burr found sanctuary at Jackson's plantation. There they and others conspired to grab Louisiana for the British. Burr was tried for this attempt at treason, but got off because one of the jury leaders was one of Burr's pals. Burr then fled to Great Britain and stayed with head of British Intelligence Jeremy Bentham. Upon his return to the United States, Burr hooked up with another British operative, Martin van Buren, and they began to use Jackson's role at New Orleans in a campaign to make him President.

The aim of the British was to destroy the Second Bank of the United State because it had helped the USA to grow and become a threat to Great Britain.

Presidency and The Second Bank of the United States

One of the favourite claims that Libertarians make to praise Jackson, to raise his stature, is that Jackson paid off the debt to create a surplus. Yes, Jackson did pay off the debt, but only the last few dollars. All the hard work had been done by Nicholas Biddle, who Jackson battled and tried to oust.

During his second term as President, Jackson tried to destroy the Second Bank of The United States by withdrawing the Federal deposits.

Jackson's first choice as Secretary to the Treasury, Samuel Ingham, would not withdraw the Federal funds in the bank. So Jackson fired him.

Jackson then appointed Louis McLane as Secretary to the Treasury. McLane would also not withdraw the Federal funds in the bank. So Jackson fired him too.

Jackson's third choice was Roger B Taney. Taney was the lowest of the low, a fellow slaveholder of Jackson. Taney withdrew the Federal funds, as Jackson requested. But where did these funds go? Taney deposited those funds in the banks that his friends owned or managed!! And what did they do with all that loot? They used that burst of fresh cash as a base to create more and more cash, using fractional reserve banking, for a speculation bubble. This along with Jackson's sale of government land (though how the government obtained it in the first place is up for debate) created a parallel speculation bubble. Both of these bubbles inevitably burst causing the Panic of 1837.

In return for withdrawing Federal funds, Jackson appointed Taney as the Chief Justice of The United States, a position Taney held for 28 years. Taney argued against Dred Scott and wrote the dreadful decision.

The Trail of Tears

During a battle against the Red Sticks a Cherokee named Junaluska saved Jackson from an attacker, prompting Jackson to declare, “As long as the sun shines and the grass grows, there shall be friendship between us.” But Jackson shortly after confiscated 23 million acres of land in Alabama and Georgia, some of which belonged to the Cherokees, and a few years later Jackson banished the Cherokees from their lands to give it to Georgia and Alabama prospectors, settlers and slaveholders. This was the Trail of Tears, a consequence of Jackson's Indian Removal Act of 1830 in which Jackson forced several tribes of American Indians to a shitty reservation hundreds of miles away. Along the way thousands died. And all for what? The Libertarian's and white man's precious element: GOLD!!!

Jackson and the Rothschilds

Another amazing, jaw-dropping claim that Libertarians make is that Jackson was anti-banker. But what did Jackson do? He appointed the Rothschilds as agents for the United States in Europe!!! This was a dream appointment for the Rothschilds and catapulted them into the big league, i.e. Jackson helped to make the Rothschilds what they are!!

So I ask again : is there anyone out there who still worships President Andrew Jackson?



I can see me asking this for the rest of my life, but I ask again: have you destroyed those reports yet, dearest teacher?

I doubt it.

Have all those you forwarded them to: your friends; your family; their friends; their families; your work colleagues; their work colleagues?

I doubt it.

Coz this is planet Earth.

Take. Take. Take.

Score. Score. Score.

Shag. Shag. Shag.

War. War. War.

Where nobody cares. And those that do just make a livin', some very nicely thank you very much, out of what they know (even if it is not the truth but rather propaganda).

I want those reports destroyed as soon as possible. If I am just a mad bastard then all the more reason to destroy them, for they would merely be just the ramblings of a geriatric lunatic with advanced dementia, wouldn't they, and thus incomprehensible?

It's been well over 2 years, and despite several different approaches to provoke a reaction to help, what have you done instead?

You've all fully gone over to the dark side!

You've all gone full.


On 17th July 2014, just as MH17 was falling out of the sky, Andrij Lysenko, the spokesman for the Ukraine National Security Council (which at the time was packed with neo-Nazis), told a press conference that Ukraine had videos of the separatists in control of BUKs.

The following day a video was released by the same Ukraine National Security Council of a BUK with a missing missile travelling through what is now considered to be Luhansk, allegedly filmed at 0500 on the morning of 18th July 2014. The video was first claimed to have been filmed Krasnodon. Why was that?

But shortly thereafter the Ukraine Counter-intelligence Chief Naida told a different press conference that the BUK that allegedly shot down MH17 was in Russia by 0200 on the morning of 18th July 2014.

In addition to these blatant contradictions and possible manipulation of evidence, Ukraine Security Service released a 'tape' of an alleged intercepted phone call which was claimed to prove 100% that Cossacks based at Chernukino had shot down MH17 with a BUK.

Belling Cat have been citing the video of the BUK with missing missile in Luhansk as their key piece of evidence in accusing Russia of shooting down MH17.

Today, Eliot Higgins has tweeted this:

Have Belling Cat checked everything about these contradictions and possible manipulations of evidence?


The former UK Ambassador to Syria, Peter Ford, says that Russia is right in destroying not just Islamic State but all Jihadis in Syria. He likens removing Assad to opening Pandora's Box, as has happened in Libya (Ford also forgot to mention Iraq too). Ford says the only solution is to back Assad and the Syrian Army.

Ford is absolutely correct on this. The UK is just one of a handful or so of nations who believe that this planet and all its resources belong to them, and they can do whatever they want. The other nations involved in this illegal attack on Syria are Israel, USA, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Qatar, Jordan and France.


When I think of the native Americans I actually begin to understand why some people are so afraid of immigrants.

When Spanish immigrants landed in South America, what eventually happened? The natives were slaughtered.

When English immigrants landed at Jamestown, what eventually happened? A whole continent of native Americans were virtually wiped out.

The immigrant Founding Fathers can be found and worshipped at Mount Rushmore, which was named after Charles E Rushmore, a Freemason. And don't worry, the men who carved the faces into The Six Grandfathers Mount Rushmore, Gutzon and Lincoln Borglum, were also Freemasons.

The immigrant Founding Fathers brought with them other immigrants, but these others were forcefully brought over from Africa and brutally used as slaves. Some of these white immigrants were so in love with slavery that even though outnumbered at least 4 to 1, and having only a rural economy with virtually no manufacturing base, they went to war to defend their white supremacy and their freedom to keep slaves. The USA can truly be called a nation of immigrants, with the native Americans quietly forgotten and tucked away on a reservation somewhere, having been forced or tricked into giving up their lands, and now scraping out a life based on gambling or flogging their heritage as a freak show.

Take this man, for example.

He is descended from German and Scottish, i.e. white, immigrants to the USA.

This could be down to the media, but Trump's main policy seems to be, "Kick out the immigrants!".

Monday, October 05, 2015


Madman Henry Kissinger received an award from The Atlantic Council last week. His acceptance speech can be read at:

In that speech Kissinger stated:
We have in the Middle East today four countries whose governments are not able to control the territory defined by international law. [That] would be Libya, Syria, Iraq, and Yemen. In those conditions non-state organizations appear that can reach beyond their geographic locality, but that are not governed by any principle of international law. In fact, many of them pride themselves on a flagrant violation of what the world considers international law. What makes it even more complex is that there are countries that act both as state and as non-state actors. On the one hand, they claim the participation in the United Nations, the attributes of sovereignty, and the general principles of international conduct. On the other, they support non-state organizations that undermine these principles in the various countries.

Libya? Syria? Iraq?

Weren't those nations named to General Wesley Clark as targets for war and regime change shortly after 9/11, even though none of them were involved in 9/11?

And Yemen?

Ah, yes.


Yemen is being bombed by head-chopping Saudi Arabia, who coincidentally supplied the patsies for 9/11, agreed with the USA and Israel to unleash the worst Jihadis on the planet onto Syria, Lebanon and Iran, and have been sponsoring those Jihadis ever since.

So although Kissinger names these troubled nations explicitly, he does not explain HOW those nations came to be in such an ungovernable state, but he does hint that he knows WHO is behind it.

And it looks like the plan is to redraw borders:
And then, so, the challenge is how one can distill a country of borders out of this complexity. And, of course, the Middle East is not the only unsettled area in the world. The emergence of China, of India, will change the distribution of power in reflecting about international order. So that is a big challenge of our time.


This was the day I realised, "Son. You're on your own."

There probably wasn't enough publicity or street cred or money to gain from protesting Freemasonry's engineering of WW1...


Sunday, October 04, 2015


According to the 'organisation' much quoted by NATO media, The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, Islamic State were in Rastan last week, executing suspected homosexuals, including a boy!!

Yet NATO media and their gimps whine that Islamic State are hundreds of miles away?!

This is in addition to the apparent positive relationship between IS and Jaish al-Tiwhad in Talbiseh. JaT released without charge an Islamic State commander who is accused of murdering many members of the local community.


This post focuses on two claims made by Eliot Higgins.

The first claim is related to Talbiseh, which was one of the first locations allegedly attacked by Russia in coordination with the Syrian military.

Here Higgins claims that Talbiseh is controlled by Jaish al-Tahwid.

But here is a report that local journalists in Talbiseh had protested against Jaish al-Tahwid, and that JaT had released without charge an Islamic State commander for an unspecified reason.
“In the northern Homs countryside: Ongoing martial law, emergency rule and trumped-up charges,” reads the sign of protester Muhammad al-Rihal.

The protesters also demand the trial of accused Islamic State militants held in rebel jails, particularly in the aftermath of the release of Rafid Taha, an Islamic State commander captured in battle by Jaish al-Tawhid this past June, and whose recent release from detention for reasons unknown is one motivating factor behind recent protests.
“How can an IS commander [Rafid Taha] be released, when he caused the death of dozens of Homsi young men, while many civilians who have never lifted a weapon are detained without trial?” Abu al-Walid said, adding that it was not clear why Taha was released.

Civilian discontent with real or perceived abuses of power by governing rebel groups stretches beyond Homs. Late this past June, protests against the detention of civilians by Jaish al-Islam and FSA factions in East Ghouta prompted local brigades to make changes in the protocol for arresting civilians.

“How long will the farce continue?” reads another sign held by a Homs protester.

[source : Homs protesters criticize rebel 'abuses', Syria Direct, http://syriadirect.org/news/homs-protesters-criticize-rebel-%E2%80%98abuses%E2%80%99/, 6th August 2015]

Northern Homs countryside is Talbiseh.

So just 2 months ago there was something going on between this Jaish al-Tawhid and Islamic State for JaT to release a commander of IS.

The second claim is that video footage of Russian missile strikes are not what we are told.

With the videos given in this:

As with the foliage on the images released by the Russian Ministry of Defence on 20th July 2014, something is not right with these videos. They all appear to be the same location filmed from different angles.

But what is more disturbing is that for several days the Violations Documentation Center for Syria has not reported any deaths in Talbiseh...until today. They now report that 16 civilians, including 3 children, died from warplane bombing of Talbiseh on 30th September 2015.

This child is named as one of those 3 children.

But why is all this happening?

I'll let General Wesley Clark answer that...


Here is Patrick Montefiore Cockburn's solution to the violence in Syria:
Russia and America need to be more fully engaged in Syria because, if they are not, the vacuum they leave will be filled by these regional powers with their sectarian and ethnic agendas. Britain could play a positive role here, but only if it stops taking part in “let’s pretend” games whereby hard-line jihadis are re-labelled as moderates. As with the Northern Ireland peace negotiations in the 1990s, an end to the wars in Syria depends on persuading those involved that they cannot win, but they can survive and get part of what they want. The US and Russia may not be the superpowers they once were, but only they have the power to pursue such agreements.

[source : Syria crisis: Let's welcome Russia's entry into this war, The Independent, http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/syria-crisis-lets-welcome-russias-entry-into-this-war-a6678526.html, 3rd October 2015]

But which 'regional powers' is Montefiore talking about?
Regional powers such as Turkey, Iran, Saudi Arabia and the Gulf monarchies do have a strong measure of control over their local proxies.

OK. So far Montefiore has mentioned Russia, America, Turkey, Iran, Saudi Arabia and the Gulf monarchies.

Doe he mention anyone else?

Yes. The Kurds.
In political terms, the disparity is even greater because the militarily powerful Kurdish minorities in Iraq and Syria, though Sunni by religion, are more frightened of Isis and extreme Sunni Arab jihadis than they are of anybody else.

Anyone else? If you are looking for Montefiore to mention anyone else involved in the war in Syria then, no, he does not. But he does drag in religion:
Intertwined struggles for power pit Assad against a popular uprising, Shia against Sunni, Kurd against Arab and Turk, Isis against everybody, Iran against Saudi Arabia and Russia against the US.

With this reference to Shia, Montefiore implicitly drags in Hezbollah.

But what about the nuclear state of Israel?

Doesn't Israel actually share a border with Syria? The notorious Golan Heights, for example?

Isn't Israel a regional power...with nuclear weapons...that has bombed Syria several times during the last 4 years...sometimes in attacks that were coordinated with the cutthroat Jihadis?

And isn't Israel providing medical assistance to the cutthroat Jihadis?

Again and again and again, Patrick Montefiore Cockburn refuses to mention the nuclear state of Israel.


Is Montefiore pretending that Israel does not exist?

And if so, is it do with his marriage?



What about A Clean Break?

What about Rebuilding America's Defenses?

What about the plan revealed to General Wesley Clark shortly after 9/11?

What about The Redirection?

The Independent introduces this latest bollocks from Montefiore thus:
In the second part of his series, our respected commentator says Vladimir Putin’s military intervention could hasten the war’s end



Saturday, October 03, 2015


Nothing, by the looks of it.

Tons and tons of it must have been consumed by the 'party people'.

But what did it actually do?

If you watch Rise of the Foot Soldier it may have helped to stop football-related violence, 'may' being the operative word.

But has it helped to make the world a happier, more caring, more compassionate planet?

Ladies and gentlemen, I present to you...Syria!


Groove Committee - I Want You To Know


The following could be a future advert for an interplanetary advert to visit Planet Earth:
Come to Planet Earth.

Live out your wildest fantasies of greed and lust.

Don't give a fuck about anything except where your next orgasm is coming from.

Don't ask any questions.

And definitely don't provide any answers.

Just take, take, take.

Feel at total liberty to not offer any help at all!!

Just take, take, take.

Shag. Shag. Shag.

War. War, War.

No questions asked.

Just enjoy yourself at Cream.

D'you know what I mean, like?

Of course you do.

Oops. I just realised this is actually live...


These were more musical and underrated as most of the so-called Britpop bands.

Doves - Catch The Sun


I looked and looked but I couldn't see you in this video, which I found very surprising, but I did see myself (3:06)

David Morales - Needin' U


Charles Lister is currently a Visiting Fellow at the Brookings Doha Center in Washington DC. The Chair of Brookings Doha Center is none other than Sheikh Hamad bin Jassim bin Jabr Al-Thani, the former Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs of the State of Qatar.

And yes, that is the same Qatar which along with Saudi Arabia, has supported the cutthroat Jihadis in Libya and then Syria. So Lister is not going to accuse his boss of anything naughty, is he?

And along with al-Thani, the Brookings Doha Center is advised by such humanitarians as Zbigniew Brzezinski and Madeleine K. Albright.

Lister recently wrote an article which was published by the BBC, in which he stated:
From the very first days of the revolution, Assad and his intelligence apparatus have consistently facilitated the rise of jihadists. This policy of aiding and abetting jihadist militants and manipulating them for Damascus' policy interests is a well-established Assad family practice, dating back at least to the 1990s.

By releasing dozens of al-Qaeda prisoners in mid-2011, Assad helped give birth to a thriving Islamist insurgency, including an al-Qaeda affiliate. By then adopting a deliberate policy of not targeting IS, Assad directly facilitated that group's recovery and explosion into the transnational "Caliphate" movement it claims to be today.

[source : Viewpoint: West 'walking into abyss' on Syria, BBC, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-34371501, 28th September 2015]

But in 2007 Seymour Hersh reported that the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia had agreed that the latter would unleash the worst Jihadis on the planet onto Syria, Lebanon and Iran.

An interesting fact is that the Brookings Doha Center was established in 2008, which was about the same time that the US State Dept started to engineer The Arab Spring.

In 2009 former French foreign minister Roland Dumas was asked by British security officials to help them to smuggle Jihadis into Syria.

In 2011 the Jihadis in Libya, who were basically Al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, were given air support by NATO and ground support from British Special Forces to abuse UN SCR 1973 and murder Colonel Gaddafi.

And after Gaddafi these Jihadis went to Syria.

And to provide more Jihadis for the Jihad against Assad, NATO intelligence services encouraged and allowed Jihadis to go to Syria. There has been a Covenant of Security between MI5 and the Jihadis, and Michael Adebalajo was allowed to preach Jihad against Assad before he tried to saw Lee Rigby's head off!

This explains the rise of Jihadis in Syria. Assad did not create them. They were smuggled into Syria, possibly along British rat lines, and have been supplied by NATO air drops and convoys through Turkey.

And as for Islamic State, the US DIA proposed such an entity in 2012, which I believe was created by NATO. The Kurds told NATO intelligence in February 2014 about Islamic State but NATO did nothing to stop Islamic State grow. On the contrary, NATO have encouraged Jihadis to go to Syria, allowed them to enter through NATO member Turkey, and provided aid through air drops and convoys of loaded trucks.

And how about this on Qatar's meddling in Syria?
The remarkable truth is that few in the Middle East would be shocked. From Hamas in the Gaza Strip to radical armed movements in Syria, Qatar's status as a prime sponsor of violent Islamists, including groups linked to al-Qaeda, is clear to diplomats and experts.

Qatar's promotion of extremism has so infuriated its neighbours that Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates all chose to withdraw their ambassadors from the country in March.

Take Syria, where Qatar has been sponsoring the rebellion against Bashar al-Assad's regime. In itself, that policy places Qatar alongside the leading Western powers and much of the Arab world.

But Qatar has deliberately channelled guns and cash towards Islamist rebels, notably a group styling itself Ahrar al-Sham, or "Free Men of Syria". Only last week, Khalid al-Attiyah, the Qatari foreign minister, praised this movement as "purely" Syrian.

He added that its fighters had suffered heavy losses while combating the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (Isil), the group behind the murder of David Haines, the British aid worker, and which is holding John Cantlie and Alan Henning hostage.

Far from being a force for moderation, Ahrar al-Sham played a key role in transforming the anti-Assad revolt into an Islamist uprising. Its men fought alongside Jabhat al-Nusra, an al-Qaeda affiliate, during the battle for Aleppo and they were accused of at least one sectarian massacre.

Instead of fighting Isil, Ahrar al-Sham helped the jihadists to run Raqqa, the town in eastern Syria that is now the capital of the self-proclaimed "Caliphate". This cooperation with Isil happened for some months until the two groups fell out last year.

[source : How Qatar is funding the rise of Islamist extremists, Daily Telegraph, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/qatar/11110931/How-Qatar-is-funding-the-rise-of-Islamist-extremists.html, 20th September 2014]

Oh, dear.

Deary, deary me.

So, in short, Charles Lister is a lying piece of shit.

But I guess he lives a nice life off his nice salary he gets from his boss, Sheikh Hamad bin Jassim bin Jabr Al-Thani, the former Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs of the State of Qatar....


Charlotte Church has been trying to defend her controversial remarks on BBC QT in which she blamed the Syria war on...climate change!!

She has been providing references to support her allegation.

Here she is:

But, Charlotte, didn't you know that it was planned in 1991, when Zionist Paul Wolfowitz suggested to General Wesley Clark that the USA "had 5 to 10 years to take out those old Soviet client regimes: Iraq, Syria, Iran"?

This was developed further in A Clean Break in 1996.

And then developed further by PNAC in their Rebuilding America's Defenses in 2000, in which PNAC dreamed their dreamy dream of war on a number of nations across the globe, namely Iraq and Iran, but also recognising the need for a "new Pearl Harbor" to provoke the American public into supporting those wars.

And then implemented after 9/11 when senior and founding members of PNAC were in control of the AWOL US military which gave PNAC their "new Pearl Harbor".

Here is General Wesley Clark stating the plan. I don't hear climate change in there, but citing climate change lets Wolfowitz etc off the hook:


I think if we write a nice letter to these cheeky chappies, kindly asking them to stop sawing people's heads off or we won't send them any Christmas hugs this year, then they might actually listen:

Listen to the words of that nice pro-abortionist Lindsey German who supports this being done to defenceless children:

The above was satire, just in case you hadn't worked it out.

The facts are these:
1. the international cutthroat Jihadis were unleashed onto Syria in the first place through an agreement reached in 2007 between the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia. The UK was in on this plot by 2009 at the latest;
2. these Jihadis were supposed to oust or kill Assad, as they had done to Gaddafi in Libya;
3. but by July 2013 they had not done so, so their sponsor Prince Bandar of Saudi Arabia, went to Moscow to threaten Putin: either Putin dumps Assad; or Bandar unleashes hell in Syria;
4. Putin rejected this offer, so on 21st August 2013 Bandar unleashed hell to provoke a war on Syria;
5. but that false flag failed to provoke the overt war on Syria, similar to that on Libya in 2011;
6. without NATO air support the cutthroat Jihadis in Syria have not been able to do their job for their sponsors, the NATO/Zionist/Gulf states;
7. so a plan proposed by the US DIA in 2012, to facilitate the rise of a Salafist entity to isolate Assad, has been implemented;
8. this entity we know as Islamic State, which has been supplied by NATO air drops and convoys through Turkey, and NATO intelligence services have been encouraging and allowing Jihadis to join the Jihad against Assad;
9. the birth of Islamic State in Syria has allowed the NATO/Zionist/Gulf states to bomb Syria and nurture the growth of IS in Syria such that it is now considered to be a threat to the existence of the planet due to allegations that it has nuclear weapons components, which in turn means that Assad could not reject any proposal from anyone to bomb IS for fear of being labelled as harbouring terrorists;
10. this also means that the NATO/Zionist/Gulf states have been illegally bombing Syria, without an invitation from Assad or UN mandate;
11. but Russia has been invited and is bombing Islamic State legally.

The NATO/Zionist/Gulf states should not have been allowed to bomb Islamic State. They should be booted out of Syria. They started the wars in the Middle East and North Africa and have brought nothing but Islamic State barbarity. They cannot be trusted to destroy Islamic State. After a year of NATO/Zionist/Gulf states bombing IS has actually grown in strength and power and influence, i.e. their 'war' on Islamic State has been a sham.

And if Assad goes, as the NATO/Zionist/Gulf states have demanded, then they will have won, they having first committed 9/11 to instigate the series of wars we have seen in North Africa and the Middle East since then.

Assad must stay in power or the real terrorists win.

And if they win then they will do similar acts again and again and again, and on a larger scale.

And if you think Islamic State are righteous dudes then why not send your kids off to Raqqa for a nice holiday?

The danger is that IS will be overtly assisted by the NATO/Zionist/Gulf states to drag Putin into an Afghanistan-esque disaster, but with McCain playing the role of Wilson, and Putin ousted in a coup, but I doubt it. I think there is too much international support for Russia's intervention.


What the fuck is all this about?

The Atlantic Council have just awarded Kissinger their "Distinguished Service Award for his extraordinary lifetime of accomplishment as strategist, diplomat, author, and the Council's longest serving board member."

Can Higgins tell us what Kissinger proposed in National Security Study Memorandum 200 in 1974?

I doubt it.

In NSSM 200 Kissinger named 13 countries that the USA should target for depopulation, using food supply as a weapon. Kissinger thought that those 13 nations were a threat to US national security, powerful nations such as Bangladesh.

Another of these perceived threats to US national security was Ethiopia, which sadly became the inspiration for Live Aid.

And that is just the tip of a very bloody iceberg for Kissinger.

It is that same uncaring arrogance we see in NATO's actions in Ukraine (where in violation of their founding principles they used violent neo-Nazis to oust a legitimately elected government to install one of their puppets Yatsenyuk), and in North Africa and the Middle East where their meddling has destroyed once functioning states and reduced those nations to cradles for the barbaric Islamic State and terrorism, leading to a massive refugee crisis.

Kissinger should not be honoured. He should be arrested.


That creepy nutter Netanyahu tries to stare down the UN GA during his speech:

Deafening silence, eh?

Well listen to the deafening silence of the 520 children in Gaza you massacred last year!!



The Dutch Safety Board is expected to release its final report on MH17 on 13th October 2105. That's in less than 2 weeks. The DSB report is expected to claim that a BUK missile brought down MH17.

But by then Russia could well have built up a significant body count of Islamic State and other terrorists in Syria.

So by 13th October the international standing of Russia could be very high, and thus any criticism of Russia in the DSB report minimised.

I'm just wondering why Russia is overtly bombing Syria now, and not last year, or the year before.

Why now?

Maybe Assad just realised he was in a bit of a pickle, and the timing merely coincidental...


Why is Patrick Cockburn allowed to write such bollocks in such a mainstream media?
Reaction to Russia’s military intervention in Syria shows that the lack of knowledge of the Syrian political landscape on the part of Western political leaders and media is hindering the adoption of more constructive policies. During the past four years, over-simplifications and wishful thinking have prevented any realistic attempt to end the civil war, mitigate its effects or stop it from spreading to other countries.

Since 2011 the departure from power of President Bashar al-Assad has been prescribed as a quick way to bring an end to the conflict, although there is no reason to believe this. There are no quick or easy solutions: Syria is being torn apart by a genuine, multi-layered civil war with a multitude of self-interested players inside and outside the country.

[source : Syria crisis: The West wrings its hands in horror but it was our folly that helped create this bloodbath, The Independent, http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/syria-crisis-the-west-wrings-its-hands-in-horror-but-it-was-our-folly-that-helped-create-this-a6677621.html, 2nd October 2015]

I have highlighted the bollocks.

I am very, very wary of Cockburn. Not just because he writes for a mainstream newspaper (and is thus under some editorial control), but he married into the Montefiore family!!

You know who Moses Montefiore was? He and Nathan Rothschild were not only close friends and family through marriage, but also some of the richest bankers in the UK and used their vast wealth to try to buy Palestine for the Jews.

This could explain why Cockburn barely criticises Israel or blames them for anything.

Take Syria, for example, in this latest load of bollocks from Cockburn. Who does he quote for an explanation of this so-called 'civil war' in Syria? None other than the Vice President of the United States of America, Joe Biden:
President Joe Biden gave a succinct account of what the administration really thought about what was happening in Syria. He said that Saudi Arabia, Turkey and the UAE “were so determined to take down Assad and essentially have a proxy Sunni-Shia war”. They financed and armed anybody who would fight against Assad, “except that the people who were being supplied were al-Nusra and al-Qaeda and the extremist elements coming from other parts of the world”.

Has Cockburn read The Redirection by Seymour Hersh in the 5th March 2007 edition of The New Yorker magazine in which Hersh states that the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia had agreed to unleash the nastiest Jihadis onto Syria, Lebanon and Iran?

Hersh does not link this to 9/11 but the timeline is clear:
1. 9/11 was at the least allowed to happen, when powerful Zionists were in charge of the AWOL US military, and Saudi Arabia had supplied the patsies (so we have here a USA/Zionist/Saudi alliance);
2. a plan for war and regime change in seven countries in five years was then hatched, with the core of those countries being enemies of Israel;
3. but by 2007 this plan was kaput;
4. so the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia agreed that the latter would unleash the nastiest international cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria, Lebanon and Iran;
5. to give these Jihadis cover as 'freedom fighters' the USA sponsored and engineered The Arab Spring;
6. the Jihadis were first unleashed onto Libya, where UN SCR 1973 was totally abused by NATO to kill Gaddafi;
7. and since 2011 the Jihadis have been in Syria, financed by Saudi Arabia, and receiving weapons and political and logistics support from the USA, Israel, Turkey, Qatar, France and the UK.

Now, why doesn't Cockburn mention Israel in his analyses?

Cockburn concludes with this very naive, to say the least, paragraph:

But any solution or diminution of violence can only come if there is a realistic understanding by Western and regional powers of the destructive forces at work.

He just doesn't seem to get that it is the Western and regional powers who started the bloody war in Syria in the first place?!

Or maybe he does but, for whatever reason, doesn't say it?...

To Cockburn the war in Syria is a genuine civil war. The fact is it is not. The war in Syria was planned by Zionists in 1991, developed in 1996 through A Clean Break, and then developed further in Rebuilding America's Defenses by PNAC. The UK was planning for it by 2009 at the latest.

This is why Patrick Montefiore Cockburn can write his bollocks in the mainstream The Independent.

Friday, October 02, 2015


You can't get more arrogant than this!!
The US, Britain and members of the international coalition bombing Isis have urged Russia to stop attacking the Syrian opposition and expressed “deep concern” over its intervention.

...“These military actions constitute a further escalation and will only fuel more extremism and radicalisation,” it continued.

[source : Russian air strikes in Syria: US-led coalition urges Vladimir Putin's forces to 'immediately cease attacks on opposition and civilians', The Independent, http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/russian-air-strikes-in-syria-us-led-coalition-urges-vladimir-putins-forces-to-immediately-cease-a6677216.html, 2nd October 2015]

So let's get this straight:
1. Syria is named as one of seven targets of American aggression shortly after 9/11, even though Syria was not involved in 9/11;
2. by 2007 the original plan was kaput so the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia agreed to unleash international cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria, Lebanon and Iran;
3. for whatever reasons the Jihadis were first unleashed onto Libya, but after murdering Gaddafi these Jihadis were smuggled into Syria and were expected to do the same to Assad;
4. those Jihadis have been causing terrorism and bloody mayhem in Syria for 4 years, but have so far failed in killing or ousting Assad;
5. so this barbaric monstrosity Islamic State was allowed to rise to give the USA and its allies the excuse to bomb Syria (for if Assad protested he could be called their protector), with NATO intelligence services encouraging and allowing Jihadis to join the Jihad against Assad, and even providing them with supplies from air drops and convoys through Turkey;
6. after creating this barbaric monstrosity the NATO/Zionist/Gulf states have then pretended to destroy Islamic State, so that Islamic State has actually grown in power;
7. Syria did not ask the NATO/Zionist/Gulf states to bomb Syria, nor do the NATO/Zionist/Gulf states have a UN mandate;
8. but when Syria asks Russia to destroy the terrorists that have been unleashed by the NATO/Zionist/Gulf states, those NATO/Zionist/Gulf states start crying like a spoiled little baby as if they own Syria!!


The NATO/Zionist/Gulf states have more arrogance than a teacher!


A month or so ago Russia was cursed and damned for using its veto to block a tribunal into MH17. In that disaster 298 people were killed. This was used as a sign of Russia's guilt. Yet such a tribunal has never been created before, certainly not for any planes shot down by the USA and Ukraine.

Today, that sword-waving, head-chopping, crucifying ally of the USA, Saudi Arabia, which provided the patsies for 9/11, then provided and sponsored the Jihadis that infested Libya and then Syria, has blocked an independent investigation into Saudi Arabia's war crimes in Yemen. Nearly 2500 people have been killed, most of them civilians killed by Saudi bombs.

So the USA, which vetoes every resolution against Israel, whines when Russia uses its veto.

But when Saudi Arabia, which unleashed the international cutthroat Jihadis onto Libya and Syria, resulting in 200,000 deaths in total (and backed up by NATO bombing in the case of Libya), blocks an independent investigation into its blatant war crimes in Yemen, which are shown on every nightly TV news program, what do we get?





Having unleashed international cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria in the first place, Saudi Arabia is expressing its concern for the safety of innocent victims in Syria:

Meanwhile, in Yemen...

Thursday, October 01, 2015


Would she ask them politely to stop?

Or let them rape and murder her?

Or would she try to repel her attackers herself?

And if she couldn't repel her attackers herself then would she scream for help, and hope that someone would come to her rescue, allowing those rescuers to use force to repel the barbaric Islamic State attackers?

The USA, Israel, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Jordan, France and Qatar are engaged in an illegal massive conspiracy to oust several leaders using such terrible force. Their latest victim is Syria. With Syria the assailants named above have not been able to convince us to support their diabolical scheme via direct war, and with Syria they have been forced to use proxy terrorists. And not just any old terrorists. We are talking the scum of the earth terrorists: rapists; cannibals; beheaders; bandits.

These terrorists have been destroying Syria for over 4 years: slitting throats; beheading; throwing people off roofs; dragging corpses behind their motorcycles. These terrorists have received finance and weapons from the above named assailants, and Israel has actually bombed Syrian Army positions in joint operations with the terrorists!

So when a nation is under attack from such a massive diabolical conspiracy, what should we do?

I hate war, but that is because they are generally engineered by elite financial and corporate interests and our governments for their selfish gains.

That is why I was against the wars in Iraq, in Lebanon, in Libya.

I have opposed war by our government in Syria because what they are doing is illegal and immoral: they are using the worst international cutthroat Jihadis on the planet to oust an international leader, having first run one of the biggest false flag attacks in history, 9/11, to kick it all off.

If US-supported Islamic State attacked me I would hope that, if I could not repel their attack myself, someone would come to my rescue, and if necessary use force.

Yes, it is diabolical that the USA, Israel, UK, etc did this.

But the people behind 9/11 cannot be allowed to win, otherwise they will do it again and again and again, and on a much larger scale.

Russia has come to the defence of Syria.

And Lindsey German is the last person in the world to oppose violence as a form of self-defence when she is rabidly in support of killing unborn children in the womb through abortion!!


I accuse Stop The War Coalition of protecting the real culprits of World War One: The British Monarchy.

This latest tweet from rabid pro-abortionist Lindsey German shows just how naive STW really are.

Some within STW know about the plan revealed to General Wesley Clark shortly after 9/11 for war and regime change in seven countries in five years: Iraq, Iran, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Sudan and Somalia. Since 9/11 we have had wars in Iraq (2003), Lebanon (2006), Libya (2011) and Syria (2011 - to present).

By 2007 this plan was kaput. So another plan was hatched between the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia that the latter would unleash the worst cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria, Lebanon and Iran. This was reported by Seymour Hersh in March 2007.

But to provide these Jihadis with cover as 'freedom fighters' the US State Dept engineered The Arab Spring.

The Arab Spring was unleashed in late 2010. In 2011 these Jihadis known as Al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb started to start trouble in Libya. They received air support from NATO and ground support from British Special Forces. UN SCR 1973 was abused and turned into a Get Gaddafi campaign, as per the plan revealed to Clark.

After Libya the Jihadis were smuggled into Syria where they have been stuck for 4 years.

For 4 years Syria has suffered having their children's throats cut, chemical attacks, their soldier's hearts ripped out and eaten, their soldier's heads sawn off, and the rise of Islamic State. NATO intelligence services have been encouraging and allowing their citizens to go to Syria to fight Jihad against Assad. Michael Adebalajo was allowed to preach Jihad in Greenwich just weeks before he tried to saw the head off Lee Rigby. And there are multiple reports of air drops of aid for IS by British and American planes, and aid convoys travelling through Turkey bound for IS.

The coalition led by the USA, which claims to have been trying to destroy Islamic State, has failed. IS has grown in strength and expanded. The above paragraphs explain why.

Finally, Assad has requested help from Russia. Russia has agreed. Russia is therefore bombing Islamic State legally.

Now, STW are suggesting that only the UN can decide who can bomb which country and why. This would be a surrender of national sovereignty to the UN. And would the USA and the UK actually vote to allow Russia to bomb their proxy troops Islamic State, Jabhat al Nusra, al Qaeda, etc?

And look what happened when the UN SC voted to allow a coalition to bomb Libya: Gaddafi murdered, and Libya reduced to rubble and now a breeding ground for IS.

But it appears pro-abortionist German would support bombing Syria if the UN gave permission?


Naive doesn't come anywhere near close.

Islamic State needs to be destroyed. Immediately. The US-led coalition have had their chance and failed miserably.

Assad has requested assistance from Russia. Russia has agreed. Russia can be more trusted in their intentions, i.e. they actually do want to destroy IS and the other terrorists (remember, al Qaeda are actually terrorists too), while the USA and its allies have so far only been pretending to do.

The question is whether Russia has the ability to destroy Islamic State and the other terrorists in Syria on its own. The intention is there.

The USA and its allies cannot be trusted. They unleashed the terrorists in Syria in the first place, and have encouraged and nurtured the growth of Islamic State.

The NATO media and their wannabes are reporting and retweeting anything and everything anti-Russia in a quest to stop Russia destroying NATO's proxy troops, the international cutthroat Jihadis, who NATO, Israel and Saudi Arabia have been aiding for at least 4 years in a bid to illegally oust Assad, either by political pressure or by murder.

But why would Stop the War support a war only if the UN OK'd it? Even though in the case of Syria the USA and UK would never vote for Russia to destroy their bastard children, the terrorists of Islamic State, Al Qaeda, Jabhat al Nusra?

And the gamble is that Russia could get bogged down into another Afghanistan in which the CIA, MI6, DGSE etc supply the Jihadis with SAMs to take out Russian jets, and anti-tank missiles to destroy Russian tanks. Islamic State and the other terrorists could then be provoked into attacking Russia, and Russia failing and Putin ousted. This is the hope of NATO.

So what should a true anti war man or woman support?

We know the true background to this conflict. The USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia unleashed this hell onto Syria. It is an engineered conflict.

We can't write an open letter to Islamic State asking them nicely to go home.

This is the conundrum: can we support Russia bombing Islamic State and other terrorists if we know for a fact that the terrorists and their ideologies were illegally unleashed onto Syria by the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia, and this bombing by Russia is legal because Assad requested it?

STW would support the bombing, but only if the UN gave authorisation.

But if the USA and UK are running the JIhadis then they would not vote for Russia to bomb Syria.

What would a 9 year old girl sex slave of Islamic State monsters want?


Well, well, well.

Look who retweeted this tweet posted by a US State Dept organisation, without verifying the source, and then tries to back it up by citing his 'expertise':

But this photo has been debunked as published days ago and reported on RT.

If you really want to understand the conflict in Syria then analyse this video.

It was planned in 1991!!

Tuesday, September 29, 2015


No contest (because there was only one):

In the word's of Bruce Forsyth: didn't he do well?


Have you read this letter to Agony Aunt Coleen Nolan?

Dear Coleen

I'm getting rather concerned about my husband.

First he lets some violent extremist Muslims loose in Libya, supporting them with our RAF and SAS, who then kill Colonel Gaddafi even though Gaddafi was giving the names of those violent extremist muslims to our MI6.

He then tries to do the same in Syria, but it's not worked out how he wanted, so he is becoming rather depressed.

But he also uses armed police to seal off a wood just so he can take it all out on and kill pigeons in secret!

And now my friends are telling me that there are photographs of him with his thingy in a pig's mouth, which if true would make him an easy target for blackmail. But I sat down with him last night after putting the kids to bed and asked him about this pig story, and he denies it all, but he is not going to prosecute the gossipmongers because he says he is "too busy".

But if he has nothing hide then he has nothing to fear, doesn't he?

Why doesn't he prosecute them for slander, if it was all lies? Because I would. Just think what all the gossip will do to our children?

I'm losing all respect for my husband. He is becoming a right fascist bastard.

What should I do?

Yours truly

Samantha from the Chipping Snorton set.

Coleen's advice is succinct:
Report the sociopath to the police.

And get out of your marriage ASAP!!


Pat Condell couldn't give a fuck about what you think!!


Didn't you know?

He doesn't give a flying fuck!

But who is Condell?

Condell is a Zionist. Although he was brought up as a Catholic, he is now a bona fide Zionist.

On his website Pat Condell Condell publishes videos by Danny Ayalon, supporting what Ayalon says.

So who is Ayalon?

Ayalon was tasked with the plum job of the Israeli Ambassador to the USA between 2002 and 2006, when the USA was getting ready to implement the Zionist PNAC/A Clean Break plan for war on Israel's enemies.

Here is what Condell writes on his website about the Israel-Palestine Conflict:
I used to be a lot more critical of Israel until I stopped looking at the situation emotionally and looked at the facts.

I’ve made several videos about this subject, so I won’t go over it again here, except to say that I now believe that the only obstacle to a peaceful solution is Arab Muslim intransigence driven by crude religious hatred, and that the western world is collaborating with a monstrous lie.

In short, I support Israel, a civilised pluralist democracy where all citizens, Jewish and Arab, are equal.

Don’t believe the “apartheid” propaganda.

Here are a few videos telling the truth about Israel and “Palestine”.

Condell then publishes several videos from Ayalon!!

So here is what Infowars have published today via the Truth Revolt website (not Condell's):

So what is Truth Revolt?

Truth Revolt is part of a Zionist media network founded by Ben Shapiro (who once proposed the ethnic cleansing of West Bank) and David Horowitz (author of the book entitled Why Israel is the Victim).

Anything that makes Muslims look bad makes Israel look good. Right?

So what did Condell have to say about the war on Gaza last year, in which Israel killed 520 children?

Well, here is Condell saying it was all Hamas' fault for using the children as human shields. Yeah! According to Condell the Baker brothers were being used as human shields as they played football on the beach.

The world according to Condell is that Israel has the right to do anything it wants and grab any land it wants because it is the only 'civilised' nation in the region. And if anyone retaliates then they are uncivilised savages who deserve all they get for using children as human shields.

Unsurprisingly Condell doesn't quite explain how The Gaza Strip and The West Bank came into existence.

Nor does Condell mention A Clean Break, PNAC,or The Redirection and Israel's alliance with Jihadis in their battle in Syria.

Nor does Condell mention that NATO bombing has contributed at least half to the number of refugees.

This is the kind of person that Infowars now rely on?

Well, when they have Pastor Chuck Baldwin on citing false history in order to drum up support for the call for the Confederate Battle Flag to be raised, when Jones openly admits that his ancestors were Colonels and Generals in the Confederate Armies, when Texas cited slavery and white supremacy as its reason for secession, what else should we expect now?


This planet is one big sick fucking joke.

Monday, September 28, 2015


Kim English - Love Thing (Angel & Marriott Mix)


The guy sat in seat 2 in the first class carriage on the NATO Gravy Train has retweeted this outrageous statement:

So who is Michael Weiss?

His twitter account states:
Daily Beast Senior Editor,
CNN Contributor,
Editor http://interpretermag.com ,
Co-author of NYT Bestseller ISIS: Inside the Army of Terror

The Interpreter is a Rothschild operation, run by Institute of Modern Russia, which was founded and is run by Pavel Khodorkovsky, who is the son of Mikhail Khodorkovsky, who co-founded Open Russia Foundation with Lord Jacob Rothschild and Henry Kissinger.

So no bias here then.

Look. Islamic State is the latest assault on Syrian sovereignty. NATO does not like national sovereignty, particularly if you do not want to use your nation for their globalist schemes.

Libya was the most developed nation in Africa. So NATO bombed Libya to smithereens to support some international cutthroat Jihadis they had unleashed onto Libya to kill Gaddafi. Libya is now an unstable cradle of Islamic State, driving many to flee to Europe as refugees. So well done NATO!

Those Jihadis were then unleashed onto Syria with a similar goal of killing Assad. But by August 2013 these Jihadis were on the verge of defeat, so Prince Bandar of head-chopping crucifying Saudi Arabia tried to pull a fast one to provoke a NATO war on Syria as had occured on Libya. But that failed, so a plan proposed by the US DIA in 2012, of facilitating the rise of a Salafist entity to isolate Assad, has been implemented.

And this illegal aggression against sovereign Syria is just one war of several that were revealed to General Wesley Clark shortly after 9/11 using 9/11 as a casus belli: Iraq in 2003; Lebanon in 2006; Libya in 2011; and the war on Syria is still ongoing, but it looks like Russia and China have finally had enough of the NATO bullshit.

But according to Rothschild agent Weiss, Assad created Islamic State!!


Has Eliot Higgins explained to us what the conflict in Syria is all about?

Don't tell me. He thinks the UK, France, USA, Israel, Saudi Arabia and Turkey are all run by angels who have had nothing but good intentions by unleashing cutthroat Jihadis onto Syrian children?

This tweet succinctly explains the conflict now:

But before this, the conflicts in not just Syria but also Iraq, Lebanon and Libya can be explained by this video of General Wesley Clark revealing the plan for war and regime change in seven countries in five years shortly using 9/11 as the casus belli, as Jeremy Corbyn correctly stated:

Between Clark revealing this, and now:
1. NATO used their engineered Arab Spring to support cutthroat Jihadis in Libya;
2. This operation was also repeated in Syria, but by August 2013 the Jihadis had not killed Assad as they had Gaddafi;
3. so Prince Bandar ran a false flag chemical attack to provoke a war on Syria, but that failed;
4. so a plan proposed in 2012 by the US DIA, to facilitate the rise of a Salafist entity to isolate Assad, has been implemented, that entity we know as Islamic State.

And to help Islamic State grow, nations such as the UK and USA have been openly supplying Islamic State through air drops while Turkey has been allowing aid convoys bound for Islamic State through its border into Syria, and NATO intelligence agencies have been encouraging and allowing Jihadis to travel to Syria, with Michael Adebalajo being a prime example: he was openly preaching Jihad against Assad, right under the noses of MI5, in the weeks before he murdered Lee Rigby.

Sunday, September 27, 2015


Russell - Fool For Love


I wasn't going to write about something that happened to me this week until I read this about John Terry:

Now what happened to me was this:
1. driving down a straight road in the countryside, I saw this black Range Rover on the other side of the road overtaking the cars in front of it, dodging in and out of my lane. OK, I thought, he's doing that because there were no cars in front of me in my lane. But as we approached each other I realised this RR was not going to wait until we passed each other before he overtook the cars in front it. So I literally had to brake to a stop to avoid a crash with this RR in my lane!
2. but then just 200m down the road, this road I was on joined a busy A road. I wanted to turn right, and slowed down, indicating my intention. But just as I was about 10m from the junction this BMW 5 series turned into this country road from the left, and drove over my side of the junction, so that again I had to brake to a stop to avoid crashing into this BMW...on my side of the road!!

And all within the space of 200m!!

But it is usually the usual cars that do this. Not the Rolls Royces or Bentleys, but the middle class cars such as Audi, BMW, Mercedes, etc. Their behaviour also includes pulling out to block a lane of traffic to turn right out of a junction.

We serve them.

They have this teacher-esque arrogance about them.

They are our masters.

They can do anything they want.


So it wasn't just because he is a fascist traitor for Wall Street who couldn't run a piss up in a brewery.

Yats, hand-picked by Victoria Kagan-Nuland, the man sponsored by NATO among others, to become the PM of Ukraine after violent neo-Nazis chased out Yanukovich is being prosecuted for accepting bribes for positions in government!!


Just a few days ago a female teacher in Manchester was spared prison, even though she had abused her position and seduced a male student.

Now there is this sordid tale of a man who set up a secret camera in his bedroom to catch his teacher wife at it...and found that her lover was...yep...a much younger male student.

Jesus H!

When will they curtail their lusts, see that there is much more to life than screwing, grow up and help to change the world?!

A TEACHING assistant has been locked up for engaging in sexual activity with a teenage pupil – after her husband secretly filmed the pair.

Sarah Candy, 36, was caught on a hidden camera “kissing and cuddling” the boy on the bed she shared with her husband James, 41.

Northampton Crown Court heard that Sara had told James – who set up the camera that snared his wife – she wanted to leave him just one week before he caught her in the act.

It’s claimed James – who had been married to his wife for 19 years – became increasingly suspicious about her relationship with the pupil at the school where she worked.

As a result, he turned detective and left his phone on record in the bedroom of their marital home in Corby, Northamptonshire.

Devastated at what was captured on the device, James handed his phone over to police – and his wife was charged with sexual assault with a boy under 16.

Sarah pleaded guilty in court and has been jailed for one year.

[source : Female teacher jailed for sex with pupil after hubby filmed them, The Sun, http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/features/6661462/Female-teacher-jailed-for-sex-with-pupil-after-hubby-filmed-them.html, 26th September 2015]

Saturday, September 26, 2015


At last...


At the very least it was allowed to happen.

But it is a 100% certainty, and even pro-war NATO agent Eliot Higgins must admit and agree with Comrade Corbyn, that 9/11 was used to unleash a series of wars in North Africa and the Middle East, a plan which is still ongoing even as we speak.

Here is General Wesley Clark revealing that plan:

If you cannot see that this plan is still being implemented, 14 years after 9/11, then you are a 100% bona fide...


Why do so many support war but not sign up to join the military to fight those wars that they support?

There are those in the corridors of power who engineer the wars.

Then there are those in Parliament who support and vote for those engineered wars.

And then there are those members of the public who support those engineered wars. They don't march for those wars. They don't shout on the street corners for those wars. But they might write to their MP urging their already war-hungry MP to vote those wars.

But they'll argue and argue and argue that such and such a war is necessary because of this, that and t'other reason.

But have they tried to join the military?

Or even the reserves?

Nah. No chance.

Armchair cowards, the lot of 'em. Happy to send their fellow man into war to be kill or be killed but can't be arsed to join them or find out what the war is really about in the first place!

But who is worse: the Member of Parliament for voting for the war, or the Member of Public for supporting the war?


Eventually the sun came out today. So I took the doggo for a good walk in the superb English countryside, looking for some wild pheasants to spring, but every 5 minutes or so I kept shaking my head in disbelief at how someone who has 3 children and could help has not offered to help.

I'm still shaking my head in disbelief now as I write.

That anger and hatred is still there, but under control, and dominated by pity, but not forgiveness.

Twenty years of research I gave her...and not one expression of thanks, or offer of help.

It ruins a good walk, it does...more than the doggo rolling around in fox shit.




United are the team for me...


King Edward VII was a bisexual nymphomaniac degenerate...but it was he who, while he was Grand Master of the United Grand Lodge of England, began to diplomatically isolate Germany in preparation for World War One.

And now we have this Piers Gaveston Society debauchery reported in the Daily Mail today, which contains this:
In keeping with this theme, guests were escorted on arrival into a large marquee containing a bar, red suede sofas and glass-topped coffee tables — designed, they were told, to aid drug-taking.

They were greeted by one of the Society’s 12 members — an old boy of Marlborough College, the £34,000-a-year boarding school once attended by the Duchess of Cambridge.

‘He was standing on a table, welcoming everyone to the party,’ recalls the English student.

‘Then all of a sudden, two men got on their knees in front of him, lifted up his toga and began performing a sex act while he was still speaking.

...But vast quantities of drugs certainly help loosen inhibitions — indeed, within a few hours, the party had degenerated into what one guest describes as ‘essentially, a mass orgy’.

He recalls: ‘People began having sex with complete strangers. It got progressively wilder, thanks to the social lubricant of alcohol and all the drugs in the world.

‘In the tents there were whole piles of people, writhing around on top of each other.

‘The next day, a male friend of mine admitted to having sex with 27 different people.’

Outside, things were barely different. ‘By the early hours of the morning, the sex tent was full and you could hardly move without tripping over groups of boys and girls fumbling, hallucinating and just drifting around,’ recalls another guest.

...All of which was, if nothing else, squarely in keeping with the Piers Gaveston’s upper-class tradition.

One of the Society’s original founders was Valentine Guinness, a brewing heir whose father was Lord Moyne and whose mother was Blackshirts political leader Oswald Mosley’s former wife Diana Mitford.

...he following year, the Evening Standard reported that ‘Lord Rothschild’s boy Nat led the way’ at the bash, ‘giving an exemplary performance as the High Priest of Pain, in so doing delighting Emily Mortimer [daughter of Rumpole author John and now a Hollywood actress]’.

Today, Rothschild is a billionaire famed for being thrashed with birch twigs while sharing a sauna with the then EU commissioner Lord Mandelson during a 2005 trip to Russia. Perhaps he got the idea from one of the Piers Gaveston bashes.

Other guests during the mid-Nineties included the future Tory MP Rory Stewart.

[source : Mass orgies, official drug dealers and the 'Lord High Spanker': Why THAT story about Cameron is nothing compared to the jaw-dropping debauchery of today's Oxford toffs, Daily Mail, http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3249633/Mass-orgies-official-drug-dealers-Lord-High-Speaker.html, 25th September 2015]

We are ruled by these people. They engineer wars and then send us to fight those wars for them, using our tax to pay for it!!

And we bail out their banks, dumping the debts on the poor and vulnerable.



NATO cannot wait for the death of the first Russian soldier or pilot in Syria. NATO may even be arming Islamic State and al Qaeda and al Nusra and every other Jihadi death cult in Syria with SAMs this very minute for that very purpose.


After weeks of heart-wrenching reference to the drowned little boy washed up on a Turkish beach, and suggestions that "something must be done", it looks like Britain is ready for war on Syria.

And just in time for a vote on that very subject!!

Well played, sir. Well played.

Friday, September 25, 2015


Saltaire Brewery in Shipley, West Yorkshire.

Every beer I've tried brewed by them has been outstanding.

Their Triple Chocolate Stout is a demon of a drink!


I am not endorsing any statements in this video below.

But my grudge is that at the end of the video the guy admits that he is an immigrant himself.

And the USA is, despite what Americans say, a nation of immigrants, the native Americans having been defrauded of their lands, annihilated by settlers and the United States Army, and driven/tricked into occupying reservations of ever decreasing size to live out a life based on gambling or selling out their heritage as a freak show.

Welcome to Sweden


He was given power in Georgia via a CIA/NED/Soros coup.

He tried to provoke a war with Russia in 2008 in order to drag Georgia into NATO.

He fled to safety in the USA.

He somehow became Governor of Odessa.

And now The Tie-Muncher of Tblisi, Mikhail Saakashvili, could soon become Prime Minister of Ukraine as soon as December!!


Is NATO looking for a war with Russia, or what?


In a controversial report, PJW demands that we "Fuck the Pope".

Apparently the Vatican is now a hot bed of Communism, having been infiltrated over the decades by agents of Bella Dodd who sought to destroy The Catholic Church from within.

But if this is the case then we need to look at the origin of Communism, don't we?

Marx, Lenin and Trotsky all had Jewish ancestry. Most of the Communist leaders in revolutionary Russia were Jewish.

So perhaps we should fuck the Jews instead?

But aren't the Jews controlled by the British Monarchy?

So perhaps we should fuck the British Monarchy?

Thursday, September 24, 2015



Just keep doin' what you do best: treating me like shit.


It is being reported that Jeremy Corbyn has still not decided on whether or not to kneel before the Queen to become a Privy Counsellor.

Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn has said he has not yet made up his mind whether he will kneel in front of the Queen when he takes part in the ceremony that will make him a privy counsellor. Giving what he described as an “honest answer” to ITV News, Corbyn said he had yet to receive a formal invitation to the ceremony.

[source : Jeremy Corbyn 'has not decided' whether to kneel in front of the Queen, The Guardian, http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/sep/24/jeremy-corbyn-kneel-queen-privy-council-labour-conference, 24th September 2015]

But to become an MP, Corbyn has already swore allegiance to the Queen. Here is the oath that Members of Parliament must (it says but not why) swear before they become an MP:

I (name of Member) swear by Almighty God that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth, her heirs and successors, according to law. So help me God.

[source : Swearing in and the parliamentary oath, The Houses of Parliament, http://www.parliament.uk/about/how/elections-and-voting/swearingin]/

If he has already swore an oath then there is nothing more in kneeling before her to become a Privy Counsellor.

Richard Burgon MP protested at swearing this oath to the Queen in order to represent his constituents as their elected representative, and was demonised in the newspapers because of it. Corbyn was not in the news over this so we can assume that Corbyn swore the oath without any protest.

Because Corbyn has already swore that oath to become MP I think Corbyn should become a Privy Counsellor because:
1. his opinions can then be heard first hand by the Queen and the rest of the sycophants;
2. he can get to see first hand how policies are formed, and then act accordingly.


Should the anti-war movement support Russia joining with Syria to destroy Islamic State?

Islamic State have existed for far too long. They were allowed to rise by NATO/Zionist/Gulf forces after their Plan A of unleashing international cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria a la Libya had failed, and their Plan B of a false flag to provoke a war on Syria also failed.

And throughout its existence those same forces have been encouraging and allowing their citizens to join Islamic State, assisting Islamic State with supplies, and after a year of those forces allegedly bombing Islamic State positions in Syria they now control more of Syria.

It is bleedin' obvious what is happening in Syria: Islamic State was created to destroy Syria and isolate Assad by giving the NATO/Zionist/Gulf forces the excuse to openly interfere in Syria. For how can Assad complain? If he refused he could be labelled a terrorist supporter.

Syria has done very well to have resisted the invasion of these international cutthroat Jihadis so far, but needs large scale and rapid assistance before Islamic State takes control of Damascus.

But should the anti-war movement support Russia's military intervention in Syria?

We can assume that Russia will be dropping bombs on Islamic State positions in Syria more accurately and frequently than the NATO/Zionist/Gulf forces did. But will those bombs be 100% accurate?

Most of us want Islamic State destroyed...and quickly.

But can't their bank accounts be traced and stopped?

How long could they survive without their cash? Or their supplies?

And who precisely are their financial supporters?

Who pays them for services and goods?

Where do they get their supplies from?

If they are supplied through the Turkey-Syria border then can Turkey be forced to close the border crossings into Syria?

And why has it taken Russia so long to become involved on this scale?


Annoyed that Russia vetoed a tribunal into MH17 at the UN SC, when the USA has consistently vetoed action against Israel, there are now rumours of a special tribunal to investigate/prosecute MH17.

The model being proposed is similar to that used to prosecute Libya after Pan Am 103. In that case a Libyan intel officer Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed al-Megrahi was initially found guilty. But years later was released. Some of the evidence used against him had been falsified.

As in the case of foreknowledge of Pan Am 103 (several passengers were warned off not boarding), Ukraine had videos of separatists in control of BUKs but still allowed civilian passenger flights over the war zone of East Ukraine even though several carriers, including BA, had decided that it was not safe to do so and flew around the war zone.