Sunday, November 23, 2014


Fully qualified teachers should be teaching the following in our schools:










What? We teach that all ready?


Sorry. Please accept my humblest apologies.


My inbox is empty, void of concern for humanity.

I've tried being the calm, nice and friendly bloke for 18 months and look where that got me.

But the tweet below, which I have posted twice this week already, indicates to me that the human race has reached a new low.

What will it take?!

How many more must have their heads sawn off before you even consider how it is that you might be able to help me?!


Brown Moses has retweeted this video by Storyful.

I would strongly recommend that you watch it and ask yourself: where are the swastikas?

Despite use of several videos shot by Svoboda there is not one Swastika in the video.


Svoboda are neo Nazi. Even the EU recognised this in December 2012 and advised everyone to steer well clear of them.

Yet does the Storyful report state this? NO!!


But it does show Bilderberg EU President Manuel Barosso and EU Foreign Minister Baroness Catherine Ashton!!

The video also shows Chuck Hagel speaking at a NATO press conference.

Why does the video not show Putin or Lavrov speaking?

Here are some facts that the video 'forgot' to cover:
1. the burning alive of over 50 anti-neo Nazi putsch protestors by supporters of Svoboda in Odessa;
2. Yatseniuk being a stooge of Wall Street and NATO through his foundation Open Ukraine.
3. the "Fuck the EU" phone call of Victoria Nuland to Geoffrey Pyatt, and Nuland's Neocon links.

The video shows Pro-Russian Ukrainians breaking into a government building and taking control of that building, waving Russian flags, suggesting that the pro-Russian separatists are thugs. That particular video was filmed by Svoboda. But nobody was killed and the building was not set on fire.


The Storyful video then tries to frame MH17 on the separatists through use of a dubious conversation that was allegedly recorded by Ukraine Security Services two minutes MH17 was shot down. Then that even more dubious video of the smoking gun BUK in Luhansk, that got there by magic carpet, is shown.

In short, this Storyful video is nothing short of neo Nazi propaganda. It uses bona fide neo Nazi Svoboda video footage several times but does not once show a single Nazi swastika. Hmmm. I wonder why? Is it because they burned alive anti neo-Nazi putsch protestors in Odessa, shooting at those jumping from 2nd floor windows to escape the flames and beating to death those who survived the jump? And it also uses senior members of the EU when the EU had warned people to stay away from Svoboda!

I am not surprised that Brown Moses retweeted this seriously biased pure neo Nazi propaganda. He has still not explained how that BUK got from Shizhne to Luhansk or retracted the statement in the first conclusion of that Belling Cat report which they say is fact yet is merely assumption.

And to top it all off Brown Moses shows concern by retweeting this about Whitehall paedophilia and its cover up:

If they can cover up this then what else are they lying about?




If they have the evidence that MH17 was shot down by the separatists, as NATO says it has, THEN WHERE THE FUCK IS IT?!


They are liars, killers and kiddie-fiddlers.


Saturday, November 22, 2014


Recall that Dr Richard Day stated in 1969 that "anything goes" would be the attitude towards sex. Homosexuality would be encouraged to add further to our degeneracy, along with abortion. But how about sex with robots?

Is this degenerating or advancement?

But a spokesman working with Ishiguro’s lab says it is not a great leap of imagination to think similar robots, given the advancement in robotics and silicone skin technology, will be used for sex.

'Physical relations will be possible in general with such androids,' said Takahashi Komiyama.

'Androids for the sex industry are a definite possibly. Some have even fallen in love with Ishiguro’s geminoids. So we can't rule those relationships out.'

Japan already boasts the world’s most advanced sex dolls from firms such as Kanojotoys or Orient Industries based in Tokyo.

Around £6,000 buys the very superior Yasuragi 'dutch wife' sex doll with extras such as movable eyes and flexible fingers and a skin texture its makers say is indistinguishable from the real thing.

Lady Gaga was so impressed with their quality that she asked the Japanese firm to make dolls in her own image.

'It is not inconceivable,' said an Orient Industries spokesman, 'that we will be making android life partners in the near future.'

[source : The hyper-real robots that will replace receptionists, pop stars... and even sex dolls: Unnervingly human androids coming to a future very near you, The Daily Mail,, 20th November 2014]

Say what?

This will contribute to:
1. anything goes;
2. depopulation.

Just like homosexuality.

Again: advancement or degeneracy?


Australian equality campaigners have called for an American online retail company to remove products that they claim promote and encourage child sexual abuse.

Café Press, an online retailer that sells clothing and homeware printed with customised slogans, currently offers baby clothes branded with messages such as a bib with “F*** like a porn star” on a baby blanket or “Awesome masturbating” written across it.

[source : Campaigners call for online retailer to remove 'unacceptable' baby clothes branded with 'sexualised and porn-inspired imagery', The Independent,, 22nd November 2014]


The D Notice.

It still exists.

It was used decades ago to hush up paedophilia in Whitehall...and still is.

The security services are facing questions over the cover-up of a Westminster paedophile ring as it emerged that files relating to official requests for media blackouts in the early 1980s were destroyed.

Two newspaper executives have told the Observer that their publications were issued with D-notices – warnings not to publish intelligence that might damage national security – when they sought to report on allegations of a powerful group of men engaging in child sex abuse in 1984. One executive said he had been accosted in his office by 15 uniformed and two non-uniformed police over a dossier on Westminster paedophiles passed to him by the former Labour cabinet minister Barbara Castle.

The other said that his newspaper had received a D-notice when a reporter sought to write about a police investigation into Elm Guest House, in southwest London, where a group of high-profile paedophiles was said to have operated and may have killed a child. Now it has emerged that these claims are impossible to verify or discount because the D-notice archives for that period “are not complete”.

[source : Media ‘gagged over bid to report MP child sex cases’, The Guardian,, 22nd November 2014]

If Ed Snowden was such a threat to national security then a D Notice would have been slapped on The Guardian. But no. The Guardian was 'allowed' to print The Snowden Revelations all of summer 2013 while it pushed for war on Syria without telling you of the plan revealed to General Wesley Clark.

So how has Snowden been used?

1. where are the weekly protests about total surveillance? Non-existent. We the people have become used to and apparently love being spied on, courtesy of Londonistan's al Qaeda and Celebrity Big Brother;
2. the heads of MI5, MI6 and GCHQ have been accusing Snowden of aiding the enemy, implying that The Snowden Revelations have harmed national security and that therefore they need more and stronger surveillance powers to beat al Qaeda and all those returning Britons who were encouraged to go to Syria courtesy of all the extremist Islamic preachers who MI5 allow to preach, such as Michael Adebalajo, because a Jihad against Assad is current British foreign policy.

They know the people couldn't give a fuck. The people only care about getting as much sex and as much money as possible.

Welcome to the human race!!


In OUR FATHERS AND GRANDFATHERS WOULD BE SO PROUD I shook my head in disbelief at what were becoming as a nation. We get up in the morning, feed the kids breakfast, drop them off at school, work the rest of the day, pick the kids up from school, eat tea, maybe a bit more work or help the kids with their homework, and then settle down for some entertainment.

And what 'entertainment' we have provided for us.

We can become the ultimate voyeurs and watch Big Brother, Celebrity or not, and spy on a bunch of people as they talk shit about shit and possibly have sex live on camera (as the producers hope to see).

We can follow the outrageously boring trivial and insignificant lives of a bunch of extremely vain men and women in Essex as they gossip and fight about who is screwing whom.

And then we can watch Z-list celebrities take showers in skimpy bikinis and then eat insects and animal penises while the presenters laugh their heads off in I'm a Celebrity Get Me Out of Here (and as with CBB the producers are hoping for some live sex).

How much further can we degenerate?

Not for us the truth about the British Monarchy through Freemasonry and their Hofjuden engineering World War One and World War Two to create a world government.

Not for us the truth about 9/11 being an inside job to kick off a series of wars in North Africa and The Middle East which have been stalled by President Assad and the brave Syrian Arab Army and Syrian people, who as punishment for demanding their sovereignty have had the nastiest and most medieval cutthroat Jihadis unleashed onto them who are being sponsored by the headchopping Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

No. Our lot is acclimatisation to the total surveillance society, a slow conversion to becoming voyeurs and perverts, mindless gossip and eating animals penises.

Our fathers and grandfathers who went through hell for us would be so proud.


How can I help?

How do you think I can help stop this scum?

What can I do to help stop this?

Friday, November 21, 2014


MJ Cole - Sincere


Chancellor George "Oik" Osborne is a member of Bilderberg. He has attended several times in recent years, possibly every year off the top of my head, and is reported to be the real Prime Minister, telling Cameron what to do.

Since the fascists coalition came to power our debt has quietly risen and risen and risen, despite pure fascist measures such as workfare and the bedroom tax and sanctions on benefit claimants and classifying people virtually on their death beds as fit to work. All these and more are straight out of the fascist's text book.

George Osborne suffered a major setback in his pledge to balance the books today - after official figures showed borrowing had gone up over the past year.

Borrowing spiked by £3.7billion – or 6.1 per cent – in the 12 months to October compared to the year before. It means Mr Osborne is well off the Government’s target to cut the deficit by 12 per cent this year.

Britain's mounting debt pile has now hit £1.5 trillion - up £150 billion in just a year.

[source : Blow for George Osborne as government borrowing RISES despite pledge to slash the deficit, The Daily Mail,, 21st November 2014]

But where did this massive debt come from? Bilderberg Brown bailed out his Bilderberg mates in the Bilderberg City of London. Brown had earlier done them a favour when he unnecessarily flogged our gold at rock bottom prices.

Anyway, we bailed out the banks. The banks had abused the power to create money out of thin air and had inflated a huge credit bubble based on property and then pricked that bubble through financial derivatives, but only when they knew who was going to be bailed out and saved: BILDERBERG BANKS!!

Yesterday there was a joke of a 'debate' on the most crucial power of who creates our money supply and what should be done with it. The debate only lasted about one hour. About 10 MPs spoke. And the maximum attendance was about 20 MPs.


There is no fucking way the banks can be trusted with the power to create money. It is because of them that we are suffering brutal Bilderberg fascist Oiksterity, which is obviously not working. Yet we are still allowing them to create money out of thin air...and they are not implementing the changes they said they would after the last crash!


This is an analysis of the first conclusion of the Belling Cat report that claims to show that Russia shot down MH17 and which has been seized and proclaimed by NATO media and politicians and their supporters as slam dunk evidence that Russia shot down MH17.

Conclusion 1 states:
Based on the available information, it appears clear to the Bellingcat MH17 investigation team that separatists transported a Buk missile system through their territory on July 17, and used the same low-loader truck used to transport the Buk missile system on July 17 on at least two occasions in August. The Buk missile system was unloaded in Snizhne and was then transported on the same low-loader truck to separatist-controlled Luhansk, now missing at least one missile.

The first sentence is a valid conclusion. We know from the separatists that they had a BUK: Commander Khodakovsky stated this; the separatists claimed to have shot down a Ukraine Air Force Antonov An 26 with a BUK on 14th July.

But the second sentence cannot be supported by any evidence presented in the first section, or indeed later sections.

The second sentence states:
The Buk missile system was unloaded in Snizhne and was then transported on the same low-loader truck to separatist-controlled Luhansk, now missing at least one missile.

The first part, "The Buk missile system was unloaded in Snizhne" is probably true. But the remainder is pure assumption.

The remainder of that sentence states:
and was then transported on the same low-loader truck to separatist-controlled Luhansk, now missing at least one missile.




No evidence is provided in the report to support this 'conclusion'. On 18th July Luhansk was a war zone. The Kiev Nazis had virtually surrounded Luhansk in an attempt to create a corridor to Luhansk Airport. Even Porky stated this was the plan in a tweet on 13th July. But in creating this corridor the Kiev Nazis gained control of all the major routes between Shizne and Luhansk to the south and west of Luhansk. In addition, north of Luhansk was controlled by Kiev Nazis, and east of Luhansk offered no easy route to Russia, if that is where it was going.

So my questions are:
1. How could the separatists transport a smoking gun BUK from Shizne to Luhansk when Luhansk was a dead end war zone infested with Kiev Nazis without it being stopped when it was much easier and safer to transport it to Krasnodon? ?

2. Why would the separatists transport a smoking gun BUK from Shizne to Luhansk when Luhansk was a dead end war zone infested with Kiev Nazis when it was much easier and safer to transport it to Krasnodon?



And there is some doubt about when that video of the BUK showing missing missiles was shot. This is recognised by the Belling Cat report itself in this statement:
While it is not possible to discern the exact time this video was filmed

The Ukraine Interior Minister stated it was shot on 18th July. But the Kiev Nazi counterintelligence chief said the BUK was in Russia on 18th July!!



So if that video was not filmed on 18th July then when could it have been filmed?

Well, there is a clue in that the separatists claimed to have shot down a Ukraine Air Force Antonov An 26 on 14th July with a BUK. Where was this plane shot down? Luhansk.

So we now have an explanation of why a BUK would be in Luhansk. That video was probably filmed before 18th July, possibly 15th July.

Belling Cat need to offer support for the following statement as soon as possible:
and was then transported on the same low-loader truck to separatist-controlled Luhansk, now missing at least one missile.

What route did it take?

How could the separatists transport a smoking gun BUK from Shizne to Luhansk when Luhansk was a dead end war zone infested with Kiev Nazis without it being stopped when it was much easier and safer to transport it to Krasnodon? ?

Why would the separatists transport a smoking gun BUK from Shizne to Luhansk when Luhansk was a dead end war zone infested with Kiev Nazis when it was much easier and safer to transport it to Krasnodon?



Answers please.

Was it by teleportation? Jedi mind control? Magic carpet?

You can't make statements like that without evidence when the report is driving us to war.

If they cannot support it with any evidence then it must be removed.. and with apologies.



Before you realise you might be able to stop it?


In addition to the proud parading of Nazi regalia, daubing Nazi Swastikas all over the show, burning people alive and branding opponents with Nazi swastikas, here is something else we are supporting in Ukraine.

Thursday, November 20, 2014


We do need an education, otherwise we would just be animals. But as most of us still are animals what does that say about our education system?

Well, I have sent tons of devastating information to one particular teacher because I believed they could help me but I needed to find out if I could trust them first before I told them how I thought they could help. Anyway it is better that they have the information first anyway. So I started sending this information in March 2013, and continued to send further information until in May 2013 I heard nothing back. But during that time no interest was shown in what I was telling them.

So I sent more detailed information in July and August 2013. Still nothing,

I then told them about TTS in January 2014 and asked them to help me, expecting that with the more detailed information I had sent in July and August 2013 about what is really going on, and them being a teacher, and with kids of their own, they would want to help. But still nothing.

And that is the way it has been all 2014. Silence and take take take.

Over a year and a half of the bloody truth, and nothing.

What have they been up to since May 2013?

What is more important than stopping all this throatcutting and headchopping and flying planes into buildings and supporting neo Nazis as they burn people alive and allowing British aid workers to have their heads sawn off?

I am just giving you all an example of what one particular teacher is like. I do not think they are all like this, but you never know.

I did not find out what I know by being told by a sexy leggy blonde in a skimpy bikini. I read something, followed up the references, read more, and then read some more and have been doing so for over 20 years. I did so out of great concern for what was happening in this world.

One thing I have to say is this: if someone told me that I was special and could help to stop all this throatcutting and headchopping I would be begging to help!!.

And another is this: if I find out that they have been using what I have sent them, including personal information, for their own personal gain or to plagiarise it..

But I suppose that is the difference: I was very concerned and chased up references.

But I ask you all now: could you trust a teacher who has done this?


In other words, who can look their children in the eyes and tell them that they don't want Islamic State to stop sawing off the heads of brave Syrian men trying to defend Syrian children from having their throats cut for headchopping Saudi Arabia.


The investigation into MH17 is not as open and transparent as we are led to believe.

The Dutch government has refused to reveal details of a secret pact between members of the Joint Investigation Team examining the downed Flight MH17. If the participants, including Ukraine, don’t want information to be released, it will be kept secret.

The respected Dutch publication Elsevier made a request to the Dutch Ministry of Security and Justice under the Freedom of Information Act to disclose the Joint Investigation Team (JIT) agreement, along with 16 other documents. The JIT consists of four countries - the Netherlands, Belgium, Australia and Ukraine - who are carrying out an investigation into the MH17 disaster, but not Malaysia. Malaysian Airlines, who operated the flight, has been criticized for flying through a war zone.

[source : Dutch government refuses to reveal ‘secret deal’ into MH17 crash probe, RT,, 20th November 2014]

And look at this retweet from the vain Brown Moses who apparently does not find it rather strange when a shot dead boy gets up, or that NATO, with its vast intelligence gathering and data analysis network, is relying on him and his team of amateurs to produce a report that is then proclaimed as the gospel truth on MH17 when it is nothing of the sort.

So let's go to the article by Amy Knight and read what she says about the Belling Cat report.

But a growing number of unofficial investigations —including a deeply researched new report issued last week by the independent journalist group Bellingcat—show unambiguously that a Russian missile system was used to down the passenger jet, killing all 298 people on board.

...Although several countries, including Ukraine, have BUK missile systems, the thirty-five-page Bellingcat report also demonstrates clearly that the BUK used to shoot down Flight MH17 was supplied by Russia. The separatists are known to have short-range missiles, but none that could hit an airliner at 33,000 feet. And, although they had posted images on the Internet of BUKs they had allegedly seized from the Ukrainian arsenal, the images were outdated and showed non-operational missiles. By using videos from Russian social media sites, the Bellingcat team was able to track the movements of a Russian military convoy that left a military base near Kursk, Russia in late June and travelled to the border with Ukraine. Unique identifying markings on the vehicles and sideskirt damage above the vehicle tracks show that the same BUK missile launcher that was later filmed by Paris Match in rebel-held territory on the day that flight MH17 was shot down. This BUK missile launcher was transported from the city of Donetsk to the city of Snizhne and unloaded three hours before the attack on MH17. The launcher was later filmed, minus one missile, being driven through rebel-controlled Luhansk. From this evidence, the Bellingcat team concludes that the BUK missile launcher photographed on July 17 had been brought from Russia and was then used to shoot down the Malaysian aircraft.

Note that Knight is convinced of Russia's guilt, with the use of words such as 'unambiguously' and 'demonstrates clearly'.

But what exactly does this Belling Cat report state in the final conclusion?
However, it is clear that at least one Buk missile launcher (3x2) from the June 23rd convoy was inside separatist-controlled territory on July 17th, and 3 days later a video was uploaded showing that the Buk system loader unit was very close to the Ukrainian border. Considering the established time frames, logical routes, and photographic evidence, it is possible that this Buk missile launcher was part of the same June 23rd convoy as “Buk 3x2” and supported it. However, it has not been possible to establish that relationship between the two vehicles.

Say what? "it has not been possible to establish that relationship between the two vehicles."?

Earlier in the report the Belling Cat team try to link that particular BUK to shooting down MH17 but fail.

Yet Brown Moses is allowing people like Knight and even NATO politicians to use his report to provoke international incidents and diplomatic fall outs when he acknowledges himself that the report proves no link!!!

And I would also add that I question the use of this phrase 'logical routes'. Assuming that the BUK seen on 17th July in Sizhne did shoot down MH17, and assuming that that BUK was the one allegedly seen in Luhansk at the crack of dawn on 18th July, my questions are:
1. how the fuck did it get to Luhansk?
2. why the fuck did it go to Luhansk?


What is logical about transporting a smoking gun BUK to Luhansk to reveal a missing missile to the Kiev Nazis when it would be much more logical to transport it to Krasnodon well away from the Kiev Nazis?


But I must stress that this is all assumption.

NATO and their gofer Brown Moses have proven nothing to link Russia to MH17. Nothing. Suggested something but proven nothing. A few coloured squiggly lines drawn on by the authors, a BUK with no number to identify itself, and a video whose time of filming is open to question prove nothing. Not the certainties that Amy Knight suggests anyway.


Do you know what a real investigative reporting team would do? Here is a hint : even Amy Knight, despite her bias, acknowledges that the Kiev Nazis have BUKs.

And they would hold a thorough open and transparent investigation.


Zac Goldsmith just spoke very briefly at the debate on money creation.

Zac Goldsmith is a member of the Rothschild banking family. You know the Rothschild banking family? Manipulators of the gold market for centuries through their bank N M Rothschild, controllers of the Federal Reserve and thus the financiers of World Wars 1 and 2, and the driving force behind Israel and thus all its brutality such as that we saw over summer when Israel under the devil Netanyahu killed over 2000 people, over 500 of whom were children, in the Gaza Strip.

Goldsmith played a straight bat for his in-laws. He basically said that most MPs do not understand banking and should not therefore at this time do anything too drastic until they fully understand banking. But given that the last time money creation was debated in the Marsten House was 170 years ago...

But at least he attended and spoke!!


Someone in the US State Department has just read VICE NEWS IS A PROPAGANDA UNIT OF NATO.


Should banks who have had the power to create money out of thin air for decades, and who have just abused that power to inflate a huge credit bubble based on property and then prick that bubble through unregulated derivatives, still be entrusted with that power?


All the banks do is:
1. engineer war, poverty and destruction;
2. take take take.


Jackson was not anti-banker, he was pro-banker.

He gave the deposits of the Second Bank of the United States to his banking friends who then used those deposits for their own greed to create a massive credit and speculation bubble which ultimately contributed to the crisis that eventually led Jackson handing The Second Bank of the United States to the Rothschilds.

But who were the agents for the Second Bank of the United States before Jackson gave it to the Rothschilds? THE BARINGS!!

And before that? CAZENOVE.

From its birth, the USA employed a British bank as their agents in Europe despite France, persuaded by Benjamin Franklin, financing the revolution!


Why did the USA employ British banks, controlled by directors of The British East India Company, as their agents in Europe instead of employing French or German banks?

And why is Jackson being proclaimed as an anti-bank hero when he was exactly the opposite?

He conspired with the assassin of Alexander Hamilton, British agent Aaron Burr, to hand portions of the early United States back to Great Britain. He was also a slaveholder, as were his political friends.

In short, Jackson was pure human scum.

Yet who adores Jackson? EDWARD G GRIFFIN!!

Some should take note of that.


There is a debate in The Marsten House going on right now that is arguably the most important debate that will occur for years if not decades. That debate is about money, who should create it and how should it be used.

As at 1207 only about 10 MPs are attending. Michael Meacher is speaking now.

I believe that this debate is far more important than going to war. Why? Because if we strip the bankers of their ability to create money out of thin air AND grab what fortunes they have then this world would be a much happier and safer place.

Can anyone out there see what I am getting at?


I posted in the summer that I was based in a nice school in a nice English town which had forced its genuinely nice students to write and draw pro-war propaganda that was designed to encourage fighting in WW1 and other wars.

I have stated that there is a teacher out there who reads TTS (because I told them and sent them loads of stuff) who I think can help me quickly stop the wars.

As yet no response.


Brown Moses seems to be quite happy about a report from Vice News Simon Ostrovsky. Here it is.

But who are Vice News and Simon Ostrovsky?

Well, here is another 'dispatch' by Simon Ostrovsky for Vice News in which Ostrovsky 'interviews' the US Ambassador to Ukraine, Geoffrey Pyatt.

But Pyatt. Pyatt.

That name rings a bell.

Oh yeah. A conversation between Pyatt and Victoria Nuland was recorded in which Nuland tells Pyatt who is going to be in the next government of Ukraine. This is the famous "Fuck the EU" phone call. Here is that phone call. Listen very carefully.

Note the duration of the interview with Pyatt; 9 minutes. AND WHAT A VERY FRIENDLY INTERVIEW IT WAS!!

Almost as chummy as Max Keiser interviewing the latest member of the Rothschild banking family Zac Goldsmith MP.

Yet how long in total is the separatist shown talking for? Far, far less. One wonders what else the separatist said that Ostrovsky is not letting us hear.

So my question is: why would Ostrovsky have a very chummy chat with the US Ambassador to Ukraine Geoffrey Pyatt, an interview of over 9 minutes, shown in full, and Ostrovsky barely challenges Pyatt on anything he says, yet Ostrovsky goes to interview a separatist and we only get to hear a few statements from the separatist? What else did the separatist say?

I think we can safely say that Ostrovsky is at least biased. He is a dual American-Israeli citizen. His fawning over Pyatt in that interview is sickening. He should have rolled over on his back and let Pyatt tickle his tummy.

Pyatt is supporting neo Nazis!!!!!!!!!!!

If you can be bothered to look, Nuland:
1. is the wife of Robert Kagan, the co-founder of the Project for a New American Century which conspired and ran the Neocon wars after 9/11 and 9/11 itself;
2. stated that the USA has spent over $5 billion on fomenting revolution in Ukraine for the IMF.

Is Ostrovsky exposing the Neocon war agenda? Not as far as I can see.

And this is the same Pyatt in that "Fuck the EU" phone call who is allowed without challenge from Ostrovsky to talk about Russia's influence in Ukraine. And lest we forget, Ukraine has a border with Russia. The USA does not.

And we are all still sat on the edge of our seats eagerly awaiting explanations of how and why the separatists, allegedly just having shot down MH17 with a BUK from the Sizhne area, would transport that BUK with its covers removed to reveal missing missiles, into the dead end war zone of Luhansk that was infested with Kiev Nazis, when they could very easily transport it to Krasnodon well away from the eyes of Kiev Nazis. I have suggested that to transport the BUK the separatists could have used:
1. teleportation;
2. Jedi mind control;
3. magic carpet.

But these are only suggestions as to how the BUK may have been transported. The why needs answering.



Answers please.

Wednesday, November 19, 2014


Petra & Co - Just Let Go (house 1990)


D'Bora - E.S.P.



Our dead were tricked into enduring all kinds of terror and shit by our monarchy and Freemasonry. We should never forget that.

Bocca Juniors Substance (Boys Own 1991)


The O'Jays - Put Our Heads Together


This time last year Ukraine was in relative peace. But then the legitimate Ukraine government decided to reject a deal with the EU and IMF and sign a deal with Russia. Suddenly all hell broke loose. Neo-Nazis occupied the Maidan and attacked policemen. The neo-Nazis occupied the building where shots came from that killed both protestors and policemen, the incident that roused the protestors, most of them neo-Nazis, in to a rabid frenzy. Eagerly encouraged by NATO the neo-Nazis stormed and burned government buildings, chased away the legitimate government and formed a Nazi junta in which they occupied the most powerful positions. Their supporters paraded around Kiev proudly displaying their Nazi heritage. In Odessa they chased anti-junta protestors into a building and burned them alive, shooting at those trying to jump from second floor windows to escape the flames, and beating to death those who survived the jump. They painted Nazi swastikas all over Kiev, in particular on the fence of and on overturned cars parked outside the Russian Embassy in Kiev.

So is it any surprise that Callous Cameron, the soulless ghoul who allows British citizens to have their heads sawn off to provide a casus belli for war on Syria, is supporting those same neo-Nazis as they brand anyone who does not support them with Nazi swastikas as if they were slaves?

Cameron was at the Cenotaph on 9th November laying a wreath while wearing his solemn, grim mask, along with the rest of our ghoulish politicians. Even Liz struggled to contain her laughter. Yet they support these blatantly obvious Nazis!!!

I don't think my grandfathers invaded Northern France in June 1944 for this!!

Did yours?


We should:
1. get the hell out of Ukraine;
2. get the hell out of Syria.

All we do is bring death and destruction and hatred.

We are better than this.

Much better.

Aren't we?


A bit late now, B!

Five Western hostages of Islamic State have had their heads sawn off. Three Americans and two Brits.

Of the Americans, the families of James Foley and Steven Sotloff both claim that they were warned with being prosecuted if they tried to negotiate a ransom with Islamic State. I have so far not heard anything about whether this threat was also issued to the family of Peter Kassig.

And of the Brits, Callous Cameron stated in The Marsten House that we should not pay any ransom because, he says, it supports terrorism. This is a total load of sweaty, wrinkly bollocks. London has been the centre of terrorism for decades. We had and may still have a Covenant of Security with Islamic terrorists. That is why it has been nicknamed Londonistan. That is why when Reda Hassaine infiltrated Finsbury Park Mosque for MI5 and had the dirt on the preachers MI5 betrayed him. That is why Michael Adebalajo was allowed to preach Jihad against Assad before butchering Lee Rigby. That is why we asked Roland Dumas to smuggle Jihadis into Syria. That is why Osama bin Laden had a mansion in Wembley.

But not only that, a former detainee of Guantanamo Bay called Moazzam Begg was approached by the family and friends of Alan Henning who suggested that he go to Syria to negotiate Henning's release. As a detainee of Guantanamo Bay Begg stood a chance of being able to persuade Islamic State to release Henning. But for whatever reasont he FCO rejected this very promising proposal. Begg still went to Syria and told the British government what he was going to do in Syria and they gave their blessing. But upon his return Begg was arrested on trumped on charges related his trip to Syria that they had blessed! Throughout the spring and summer Begg was detained in custody where he could not negotiate the release of any hostage. It is of great significance that Begg's trial collapsed shortly after Alan Henning had his head sawn off.

Needless to say, Callous Cameron used the brutal deaths of David Haines and Alan Henning as a casus belli against Islamic State, which is now, surprise, surprise, instead turning into a war on Assad.

But in addition, our allies Saudi Arabia and Qatar have been financing the international cutthroat Jihadis in Syria with millions and millions of dollars. Indeed, Prince Bandar of Saudi Arabia, who is heavily implicated in 9/11, ran the false flag of Ghouta after threatening Putin that unless Putin dumped Assad then Bandar would unleash hell in Syria. Saudi Arabia chops the heads of its people. So does Islamic State. Coincidence? NO FUCKING WAY!!

There is a treaty that was agreed at the G8 meeting in 2013 that those nations present would not pay ransoms for hostages.

But France ignored the treaty. As have other nations. As a consequence French hostages of Islamic State have been released and are enjoying life with their families and friends with their heads still attached to their torsoes.

But not so for James Foley, Steven Sotloff, Peter Kassig, David Haines and Alan Henning.

Not for them the joys of life with their heads still on their shoulders. Their fate was decided in Vauxhall and Langley: OFF WITH THEIR HEADS!!

Instead of negotiating the release of David Haines and Alan Henning, as France would have done, Callous Cameron and Obama used their citizens having their heads sawn off as a casus belli for war on Islamic State, which is now, surprise, surprise, instead turning into a war on Assad.

While publicly maintaining a long-standing US policy of not negotiating with terrorists or paying ransoms, the White House has quietly ordered a review of relevant policies following a series of executions of US citizens by Islamic State militants.

[source : Obama orders review of US hostage policy, RT,, 19th November 2014]

We have to ask: why did France ignore the treaty and pay ransoms while the USA and UK didn't but then used the brutal deaths of their citizens having their heads sawn off as a casus belli?

I think Cameron or someone in the FCO should be done for cold-blooded murder.


You do indeed get treated like shit by the very people you are trying to help and would expect would want to help but ostracise and ridicule you instead.

But the show must go on towards its hopefully happy ending...


You teachers. You Gods of the classroom and of the corridor. You manufacturers of the next generation of robots for the system. You should be begging to help, not ostracising and ignoring those who are risking their life and livelihood to make this a safer and happier world for not just your children but for all the children all over the world.

What are you ashamed of? Scared of?

It can't be anything that I have said or done.

So is it something that you have said or done?

Or do you like seeing cutthroat Jihadis being unleashed onto defenceless Syrian children and Syrian military personnel, who are trying to protect those children, having their heads sawn off on camera?


There is at this very moment 0853 on BBC Radio 4 a report on a museum of sex. One of the curators has just been talking about Alfred Kinsey who she said interviewed over 41000 Americans and found that America was more perverted than first thought, and that Kinsey's report kick started the gay rights movement in America.

But hold on!!

First, the curator is being very liberal with her definition of 'American' because Kinsey interviewed many criminals and prisoners, many of whom had been convicted for sexual offences!! So that introduces a massive bias right there.

And second, Kinsey's 'research' was funded by...THE ROCKEFELLERS!! Yep, the Rockefellers, supporters of, financiers of and collaborators with the Nazis.


I cannot believe my ears!

Justin Webb is now on BBC Radio 4, at this very moment 0837, discussing how to incite a revolution against Vladimir Putin!


In 1969 high level Rockefeller employee Dr Richard Day stated to a private audience what would happen during the next few decades. He said that regarding sex "anything goes" would be promoted. One particular aspect of this that would be promoted was homosexuality. Homosexual characters and personalities on TV and in films began to appear with increasing regularity around 1970.

Homosexuality has several benefits for our globalist elite:
1. it encourages people to find physical relief rather than find political solutions to their plight as they suffer more war, fascist austerity and the imposition of a world government;
2. it reduces the birth rate, which coincides with this myth that the earth is overpopulated, i.e. there are too many of us to control.

One famous homosexual was Alan Turing. He was the academic driving force behind the breaking of the Nazi Enigma code during WW2. After the war he was found guilty of indecency and chemically castrated. There is some debate about whether he killed himself or died by accident.

On 28th June this year I proposed a protest outside Freemasons Hall to protest the engineering of WW1 by Freemasonry on the orders of the British monarchy. Only I turned up. But on the other side of Covent Garden there was a huge celebration of blokes sticking their cocks up other blokes arses. WW1 was engineered by the nymphomaniac bisexual degenerate King Edward VII.

So why have attitudes towards homosexuality changed so much? Why?

Why in 1951 would we consider it normal and acceptable to chemically castrate Alan Turing yet in 2014 find it normal and acceptable for homosexuals to parade up and down The Strand to 'celebrate' their sexuality?

It is my personal opinion that there is something degenerate about a bloke who wants to stick his cock up any arse, man's or woman's. But does this mean they should be chemically castrated? Battered? No.

So why have attitudes changed so much?

Well, I will answer that question with this question: why are our newspapers not reporting daily the speeches of General Wesley Clark in which he states that there is a conspiracy to implement a series of wars in North Africa and the Middle East?

This agenda to promote homosexuality is being implemented in nations belonging to NATO and the former British Empire, i.e. the same nations implementing the series of wars in North Africa and the Middle East, who have now degenerated so much that they have unleashed cutthroat Jihadis onto defenceless Syrian children. On the other hand Russia is opposing this series of wars and is also opposing the promotion of homosexuality.

So to put it bluntly: we are promoting homosexuality while unleashing cutthroat Jihadis onto defenceless Syrian children. Russia is opposing both.

There can be only one reason why a film about Alan Turing would be made now: to promote homosexuality.

I watched The Imitation Game yesterday and got the impression that the film was more about promoting homosexuality much more than promoting the mathematics and science of what Turing and his team did. You could argue that the maths and science would be above the vast majority of a potential typical audience. The maths in the film consisted of one simple equation and the science consisted of mention of dials and switches. There was no attempt to describe how Turing was trying to use maths and science to solve the Nazi Enigma code other than that he was trying to create a machine that could calculate hundreds of billions of possibilities.


But was Turing more interested in advancing mathematics and science, or promoting homosexuality? Would Turing want a film made about his machine and the science and maths behind it rather than his homosexuality? I think the former. So should the film have been more about remembering what Turing did by advancing mathematics and science rather than homosexuality? I think so.

Let's get one thing straight: Alan Turing should never have been chemically castrated.

So why did it take until 2013 before he received a royal pardon?

We have to ask: why is homosexuality now being promoted while we are not being told that our very own monarchy engineered World War 1 and through their Hofjuden also engineered World War 2, and are now implementing a series of wars in North Africa and the Middle East that now involve the deployment of cutthroat Jihadis onto defenceless Syrian children?

I would argue that this promotion of homosexuality must be part of the "anything goes" agenda stated by Dr Richard day in 1969.


Examine the image in this tweet.

Does history repeat itself?

The image repeats the mildly popular analogy that Zionism is Nazism and that Zionism is executing a holocaust against the Palestinians.

The Nazis allegedly murdered 6 millions Jews, and Israel has been citing that holocaust as its raison d'etre, to provide a safe haven fro Jews from a cruel and harsh world.

Zionism can be traced to a weirdo called Jacob Frank. Frank claimed to be the reincarnation of Sabbatai Zevi who had tried to persuade the Sultan of the Ottoman Empire to give Palestine to the Jews. Frank tried a different approach to create a Jewish state and created what can only be described a sex cult. Frank was found guilty of heresy and banished to Offenbach where he was financed by the Rothschilds. With their vast wealth from banking, the Rothschilds and their good family friends and business partners the Montefiores, then began to try to buy land in Palestine. Colonisation funds were established for this purpose. Some kind of deal was reached between the Zionists and the British Government during WW1 in which it is alleged the Jews would bring the USA into the war on the side of Great Britain if Great Britain would hand Palestine to the Jews. This was coded in The Balfour Declaration. After WW1 mass Jewish immigration began into Palestine. Riots and massacres resulted. The Zionists formed an apparently unlikely but logical friendship with the Nazis: the Nazis wanted Jews out of Germany; the Zoinists wanted Jews in Palestine. The rise of Hitler and the Nazis is for a separate post, but there is very significant evidence that the Nazis were deliberately created by The City of London and Wall Street for world war. But there was a problem: most German Jews did not want to move to Palestine, despite the Nazis and their violence!! The Nazis actually collaborated with the Zionists and smuggled out Jews to Palestine. Before and during WW2 Zionist leaders wrote and spoke of how after the war Israel would be created but the old, weak and sick would have to be sacrificed. The holocaust traumatised the Jewish youth so much that they formed terrorist organisations who committed war crimes, massacres and atrocities as they drove nearly one million Palestinians off their lands and into the largest refugee camps of The Gaza Strip and The West Bank. The British, who had the mandate for Palestine, stood idly by and watched, even as the Zionist terrorists murdered British soldiers and bombed their headquarters. Eventually Great Britain left the Jewish terrorists to it and Israel was formed. Since then the holocaust has been used as emotional blackmail by Israel to extract billions of dollars of aid every year and promises of defence. With this backing, Israel, just like NATO, has expanded and expanded and expanded. In response Palestinians created their own terrorist organisations and committed atrocities such as at Munich 1972 Olympic Games. More recently, every 2 years or so Israel executes an engineered war on Gaza. Anywhere between several hundred to several thousand Palestinians die in each war. The wars also reduce Gaza to more rubble and add to the time it will take for reconstruction.

So no. History is not repeating itself. Not exactly.

But yes. Israel is engaged in what can only be described as ethnic cleansing, but on a scale smaller than the Nazi holocaust of the Jews.

Basically, Israel has been created through terrorism and collaboration with the Nazis.

Tuesday, November 18, 2014


Over the summer Israel killed over 2000 people in Gaza. One incident involved the bombing of four boys playing football on the beach. The response from our politicians was diabolical. It took Ed Miliband 10 days before he criticised the outrageous genocide that Israel committed.

Today it appears that two Palestinians killed four Israelis. The response is predictable: Tzipi Livin, Mark Regev and the usual kind of Zionist commentator has been on TV news all afternoon crying that the attack was outrageous and must be condemned by the international community, and that Israel will respond blah blah blah...

But Israel killed over 2000 people over the summer. Is that not enough? Is it possible that Israel killing over 2000 people in Gaza over the summer might, just might be related to today's incident? Or related to the death of a Palestinian bus driver who was recently hanged in his own bus by Israeli settlers?


In SO WHAT ARE THE COMPLEXITIES OF THE CONFLICT THEN? I posted earlier this morning I explained what the complexities of the conflict in Syria are. If you do not not know then go to the above link and read them.

But in 2007 Syria was at peace with itself: no mass beheadings; no crucifixions; no false flag chemical attacks; no children with their throats cut; no children playing football kicking a head around in the street.

This only started to happen after the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia decided to unleash the nastiest cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria, Iran and Lebanon, but first unleashing them onto Libya. Assad is blocking the development of a pipeline from Qatar to Europe that would threaten Russia's business with and influence over Europe.

But this is Syria today.

Welcome to Syria.

For over three years Assad, the Syrian Arab Army and the Syrian people have stood up to this barbarism that has been financially supported by Saudi Arabia and Qatar, politically and morally supported by the UK and USA, logistically supported by the USA, Turkey and Jordan, and medically supported by Israel. The butchers are not Syrian. They are from all over the world. The conflict in Syria has been driven from outside. Some Syrians fell for the Arab Spring but realised the error of their ways and rejoined the Syrian people.

But what is our solution? OUST ASSAD!!

Yep! Oust the man who with the support of the Syrian military and people has been defeating this medieval barbarism for 3 years!!


Islamic State was deliberately created to be used in whatever way to oust Assad in order to get that Qatar-Saudi-Jordan-Syria-Turkey pipeline built to diminish Russia's global influence. The conflict in Ukraine is also part of this war on Russia.

The driving force for all this is in London.

I think I can stop all this war and butchery quickly...but not on my own.

There is a teacher out there who I think can help me but who doesn't want anything to do with me. I don't have bad breath. I don't sacrifice kittens to Satan. I have not done or said anything to or about this teacher for them to have treated me this way. I am I think a good man with a good heart and a good brain, but for whatever reason I was and still am ostracised...even though I have told that teacher that I write TTS and sent them lots of other stuff too (which they did not tell me to stop doing even though I asked them to tell me if they wanted me to stop sending stuff).

I would expect that teacher to be begging to help me, to find out in what way I think they can help me to make this world a safer, happier world for their children.

But for whatever reason they do not want to help me or talk to me.

What that teacher doesn't seem to realise is that this kind of tyranny from Islamic State is planned for us all: mass depopulation, pure fascism, no human rights or freedoms, just uneducated half-human, half machine workers who are reduced to erotic animals with no empathy for anything.

Is that what they want? For all this to continue until we have degenerated to animals and can degenerate no more?



This is just for someone who I thought was special but has turned out to be unspecial.

I asked you to help because I think you can help me quickly stop all this shit, but for whatever reason you have refused. If you are not prepared to help then stop reading TTS, and tell your friends and family to do the same. If you can do better then do it. And stop clicking WORLD WAR ONE WAS A CONSPIRACY as if you believe it and mean it. It is obvious you don't believe it because if you did believe it then you would want to help, but you have made it crystal clear that you do not want to help or have anything to do with me.

I tried to tell you all this over a period of several months because I thought and expected you would be most concerned and interested, but you weren't interested. So I tried to show you just how bad the situation is but you then severed all communication...AND STILL DO!!

And to think that you do what you do...

I shake my head in total disbelief.


An open letter has been written to the makers of a video that was said to be shot in Syria but was actually shot in Malta. The filmmakers say the video was made "to generate a discussion about children in conflict zones", according to a BBC report. The letter contains these paragraphs.

This film will feed in to attempts to cast doubts on real stories coming out of Syria by citizen journalists and professional journalists alike. It proves the filmmakers, and those who have funded it, have little understanding of the complexities of the conflict and have no regard for the risk people take upon themselves to document the ongoing violence and conflict.

In a conflict as vicious and open-ended as the one in Syria, there are real stories of heroism daily by the people who bear witness to the suffering of the people. Many have paid dearly with their lives.

So what are the 'complexities of the conflict' then?

You would think that the authors would know the 'complexities of the conflict' from the way the letter has been worded. But do they really know the complexities of the conflict? Can they explain why in 2007 Syria was at peace with itself but in 2014 Syria is a carcass of a state, infested with cannibal cutthroat Jihadis, reduced to a pile of rubble with rivers of blood running through the streets and children playing football with decapitated heads? As far as I am aware the authors of the letter are unaware of the complexities of the conflict, or if they are then they have decided to ignore them and pursue their own agenda.

The 'complexities of the conflict' in Syria are this:
1. 9/11 was an inside job to kick off a series of wars in North Africa and the Middle East, as revealed to General Wesley Clark;
2. There was supposed to have been war and regime change in seven countries in five years: Iraq, Iran, Lebanon, Syria, Libya, Sudan and Somalia;
3. But by 2007 there had been war and regime change in only Iraq and Lebanon, and the general public were getting weary of war;
4. So a Plan B was agreed between the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia that the latter would unleash the nastiest cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria, Iran and Lebanon, and would be given cover as 'freedom fighters' by the US State Dept-engineered Arab Spring. However the Jihadis were first unleashed onto Libya.
5. In 2009 former French foreign minister Roland Dumas was asked by Great Britain to help them smuggle Jihadis into Syria;
6. After Libya the Jihadis were smuggled into Syria, and have been eating the hearts of the prisoners, slitting the throats of defenceless Syrian children and using chemical weapons in genocidal false flags to try to trick NATO into bombing Assad;
7. Great Britain has been allowing demented Islamic extremists to base their HQs in London for decades, and allowing them to preach Jihad in the UK. One of these preachers was Michael Adebalajo who in the weeks before he murdered Lee Rigby was allowed by MI5 to preach Jihad against Assad in order to persuade Muslims to go to Syria and join the Jihad against Assad as part of this plan B to oust Assad;
8. When the Syrian Arab Army began destroying the cannibal cutthroat rebels the rebels fled to Iraq, where Iraqi Army officers were bribed to stand down and allow Islamic State to be created;
9. The UK and USA allowed some of their citizens, some of whom were journalists, to have their heads sawn off by Islamic State and use those atrocities as a casus belli;
10. Now the USA and UK are bombing Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, but surprise, surprise, are now suggesting that to destroy Islamic State we must oust Assad, even though it is Assad and the Syrian Arab Army who have been fighting and defeating the cannibal cutthroat rebels for 3 years!!;
11. The cannibal cutthroat rebels have been receiving financial support in their bid for 'freedom and democracy' from none other than that utopia of freedom, democracy and human rights, the headchopping Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, as well as from the slave economy Qatar, who are both well known for their funding of terrorism, including 9/11;
12. The cannibal cutthroat rebels have been receiving moral support from Cameron and Hague, weapons and logistical support form the USA, and medical support from Israel;
13. And the reason these nations first unleashed the cannibal cutthroat rebels onto Syria and have been supporting them ever since is because they want to build a pipeline from the Pars field through Qatar, headchopping Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Syria and Turkey, and then onto Europe to threaten Russia's business with and influence over Europe, while Assad wants a pipeline from the Pars field through Iran, Iraq, Syria and Lebanon, and then onto Europe but without threatening Russia's business or relations with Europe.

These are the 'complexities of the conflict'.

Yet some people appear to be siding with the authors of this slaughter...


Remember a few weeks ago when it was reported that, oopsadaisy, an airdrop from the USA somehow found its way into the hands of Islamic State? Well, Iraq intelligence is reporting that the USA is making airdrops to Islamic State to supply them with weapons and food. Their evidence is that Islamic State are using special armour-piercing bullets that are only available through the Pentagon.

On Saturday, Iraqi security sources disclosed that the ISIL terrorist group is using the state-of-the-art weapons which are only manufactured by the US and each of their bullets are worth thousands of dollars.

"What is important is that the US sends these weapons to only those that cooperate with the Pentagon and this indicates that the US plays a role in arming the ISIL," an Iraqi security source told FNA.

The source noted that the most important advantage of the US-made weapons used by the ISIL is that "these bullets pierce armored vehicles and kill the people inside the vehicle".

He said each of such bullets is worth $2,000, and added, "These weapons have killed many Iraqi military and volunteer forces so far."

[source : Iraq Intel Report: US Planes Supplying ISIL with Weapons, Foodstuff, Fars News Agency,, 16th November 2014]

Perhaps this explains why Samantha Power said nothing about the brutal execution of Syrian soldiers.

The whole point of Islamic State is to oust Assad. This is why when the Kurds told NATO what the Syrian rebels were planning NATO did nothing, and Iraqi officers were bribed to order their unis to stand down and allow the rebels to seize weapons and bank accounts. This is why the Pentagon is in a phony war with Islamic State while supplying them with special armour-piercing weapons. And all this is being done because the Syrian Arab Army was beating the rebels, so Saudi Prince Bandar ran a false flag at Ghouta last year but it failed to provoke NATO into bombing Syria. Assad is delaying the development of a pipeline from the Pars field through Qatar, headchopping Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Syria and Turkey and then onto Europe to threaten Russia's business with and influence over Europe. And 9/11 was an inside job to kick off a series of wars in North Africa and the Middle East for NATO to destroy decades of development and grab control of people and natural resources.

Monday, November 17, 2014


I just figured out how the separatists got that smoking gun BUK from Sizhne to Luhansk : MAGIC CARPET!!

Now, if I can just figure out why they would want to fly a smoking gun BUK with missing missiles by magic carpet into a dead end war zone where there were loads of Kiev Nazis all desperate to find that smoking BUK...


In SO WHO IS LYING? yesterday I asked:
1. how could the separatists transport a smoking gun BUK from Sizhne through a war zone infested with Kiev Nazis to reach Luhansk?
2. why would the separatists transport a smoking gun BUK from Sizhne through a war zone infested with Kiev Nazis when they could very easily transport it to Krasnodon beyond the eyes of the Kiev Nazis?

I proposed two possibilities:
1. teleportation;
2. Jedi mind control.

Does anyone have any other suggestions yet?

Because the credibility of the Belling Cat report, proclaimed by NATO media and politicians to be the gospel and slam dunk evidence that Russia shot down MH17, rests on it.

I remain totally unconvinced by that report with its coloured squiggly lines drawn by the authors and references that destroy the credibility of the report itself. The report shows that a convoy of Russian BUKs travelled south through Russia near Ukraine in June, but beyond that there is nothing slam dunk to link that convoy with MH17 except a few coloured squiggly lines drawn by the authors themselves and a dodgy video whose authenticity and credibility is in serious serious doubt.

If NATO has better 'evidence' than this then where is it?





This shows the sickening bias in our media.

Peter Kassig has been beheaded. He is now the third American hostage to have his head sawn off, and the fifth 'Westerner'. But 'Western' nations such as France have paid ransoms to have their hostages released. So why have we not paid ransoms to save David Haines and Alan Henning and instead blocked Moazzam Begg from negotiating their release by detaining Begg on trumped up charges, and the Americans not paid ransoms for James Foley, Steven Sotloff and Peter Kassig, instead threatening their families with prosecution if they tried to negotiate payment of ransom?

Is it because our politicians can then cry fake tears and display fake outrage at their beheadings and demand war as retribution?



It is all done to get us into Syria to oust Assad.

But also shown in the latest flashy video released by Islamic State were Syrian Arab Army soldiers who were also beheaded. The Syrian Arab Army has been fighting Islamic State and their ilk for years. They were being called child murderers, war criminals by the likes of Cameron. Islamic State and their ilk have been receiving support from our governments and their allies for years: financial support from headchopping Saudi Arabia and Qatar; moral support from Cameron and Hague; material and logistical support from the USA and Turkey; medical support from Israel. And that is just for starters.

This latest flashy video shows that we should ally with Assad, not oust him.

But the reason we won't ally with Assad is because he is supposed to be ousted.

Shortly after 9/11 General Wesley Clark was told of a plan for war on seven nations in five years. Here he is stating this.

But after five years only Iraq had been 'taken out'. So in 2007 an agreement was reached between the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia that the latter would unleash cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria, Iran and Lebanon, but were first tested out in Libya.

Assad is blocking the development of a pipeline from the Pars field through Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Syria and Turkey and then onto Europe to threaten Russia's business and influence in Europe. Assad wants a pipeline from Pars through Iran, Iraq, Syria and I think Lebanon (but don't quote me on that). But this shows the alliances of today: we in the form of our corrupt, fascist and now obviously paedophile British Government, have been supporting international cutthroat Jihadis as they butcher their way through Syria with the goal of ousting Assad to get that Qatar-Saudi-Jordan-Syria-Turkey pipeline built and Israel wants a piece of the action. This is why 9/11 was done as an inside job. This is why Zionist agents wrote of a "new Pearl Harbor" to unleash the USA onto Israel's enemies and were in powerful positions before, on and after 9/11 to allow that "new Pearl Harbor" to occur and influence the reaction to it. This is why Saudi Arabia provided the patsies for 9/11. This is why war criminal Henry Kissinger was first appointed to investigate 9/11, to cover it up. This is why the official investigation board of inquiry into 9/11 and some American politicians want to see 28 pages of a classified report into Saudi involvement in 9/11.

Assad is now a huge threat to those who planned and executed 9/11. The longer their plan is stalled by Assad the more likely their plan will be exposed.

I am exposing it, risking life and livelihood to do so, but also being surprisingly and disappointingly ostracised by some who I expected would want to help.

But do you know what? Fuck it!!

My grandfathers didn't risk their lives in Northern France in 1944 so that we can support neo-Nazis in Ukraine as they shell children in Donetsk and Luhansk, or support international cutthroat Jihadis slitting the throats of defenceless Syrian children so that headchopping Saudi Arabia and slave economy Qatar can get even richer and then invest their blood money in this Disunited Fascist Queendom!

It may not look like this is what is happening (that is if you can be bothered to look in the first place)...but it is!!

When are people going to wake up?!

Perhaps that is what this strange urge to be in London is all about?


Anything goes but the truth that is, but with our decadence and degeneracy, that I saw manifest and made me nauseous on 28th June this year, some I know might prefer that...even though they have children themselves.


Here is General Wesley Clark stating the plan for war and regime change in seven countries in five years, those countries having nothing whatsoever to do with 9/11.

We are not being shown this daily in the NATO media (or Russian media for that matter, which raises some concern).

Why is the same NATO media which does not daily tell us this plan for war and regime change in seven countries in five years telling us daily that a dodgy report by Belling Cat, whose credibility is now in shreds, is 'proof' that Russia shot down MH17, when NATO has the world's largest and most powerful intelligence gathering and analysis network and has not deployed it to prove in a day that Russia shot down MH17?

Sunday, November 16, 2014


Why have NATO not released any evidence they say they have on the alleged shootdown of MH17?

Why are NATO relying on Brown Moses and Belling Cat to very slowly 'prove' that the separatists shot down MH17 by 'social media', when NATO has the largest and most powerful intelligence gathering and analysis network in the world and could do in one day what Brown Moses and Belling Cat have done in 4 months?

Why are NATO relying on a very dubious video of a BUK said to have been filmed in Luhansk at the crack of dawn on 18th July when on 18th July Luhansk was a war zone and surrounded by Kiev Nazis, Luhansk was a dead end, and to get any BUK inside Luhansk without being stopped and/or seen would require the separatists to use (Russian-supplied?) teleportation and/or the use of Jedi mind control on any Kiev Nazis who stop the BUK at any road block: "This is not the BUK you are looking for"?

Why is mention of the Kiev Nazis possessing BUK systems on 17th July and their deployment close to Donetsk on 17th July never made in any NATO media or any report that they promote?





So with the credibility of the Belling Cat report now in shreds, we can now turn to focus on where the BUK systems of the Kiev Nazis were on 17th July.

This seems to be a crucial but overlooked fact: the Kiev Nazis had BUKs on 17th July.


Got that?

The Kiev Nazis had BUKs on 17th July.

And some were in or close to the area that MH17 flew over.

So where exactly were the Kiev Nazi BUKs on 17th July?


It's a pity Russian satellites couldn't zoom in on one of those BUKs to show the Nazi Swastikas on those BUks.

Remember them? The Nazis? Allegedly murderers of 6 million Jews?

I think, if my memory serves me correctly, we fought the Nazis in WW2. Many a British man and woman risked their life to stop the advance of the Wall Street-sponsored Nazis.

What would they think of those of us alive today supporting neo-Nazis in Ukraine as they indiscriminately shell children in Luhansk and Donetsk?


On 18th July a video of a BUK with covers removed was published which the Ukraine Interior Minister claimed was filmed in Krasnodon at the crack of dawn on 18th July. He may have changed this to being in Luhansk later.

But he is apparently wrong!

NATO media and politicians have proclaimed a report recently published by Belling Cat to be the gospel on MH17. The report explicitly states that the video was filmed in Luhansk. OK? Got that? Luhansk.

That report also cites the aforementioned video as evidence that Russia shot down MH17 because the BUK in that video is being transported on a red trailer and pulled by a white cabin which the report suggests was under the control of the separatists at the time.

The report also cites Associated Press as a reference, in particular a report published on 25th August. From the Belling Cat report:
The UAP reported on August 25th that “On July 17, AP reporters in the town of Snizhne saw a tracked launcher with four SA-11 surface-to-air missiles parked on a street. The bulky missile system is also known as a Buk M-1. Three hours later, people six miles (10 kilometers) west of Snizhne heard loud noises and then saw the wreckage and bodies from Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 fall from the sky.” Three hours prior to the time MH17 was downed was 1:20pm local time, supporting the time indicated by the shadows in the Snizhne photograph.

[source : Page 9]

But buried in that report is something that destroys the credibility of that Belling Cat report!

There is this paragraph:
One told the AP on Aug. 18 that he had seen a major new arrival of equipment traveling toward the rebel-held city of Luhansk, which is virtually surrounded by government troops and has come under weeks of sustained shelling that has cut off water, power and phone service, and led to daily bread lines.

Let's read that again because it needs to be fully understood.

One told the AP on Aug. 18 that he had seen a major new arrival of equipment traveling toward the rebel-held city of Luhansk, which is virtually surrounded by government troops and has come under weeks of sustained shelling that has cut off water, power and phone service, and led to daily bread lines.

So a reference used in the Belling Cat report itself states that on 18th July Luhansk was "virtually surrounded by government troops and has come under weeks of sustained shelling that has cut off water, power and phone service, and led to daily bread lines".

So as I asked earlier this week:
1. how could the separatists transport a smoking gun BUK from Sizhne through an area infested with Kiev Nazis to reach Luhansk?
2. why would the separatists transport a smoking gun BUK from Sizhne to an area infested with Kiev Nazis when they could very easily transport it to Krasnodon beyond the eyes of the Kiev Nazis?

But it gets worse.

On 25th July Peter Leonard apparently interviewed a separatist who stated that the separatists did it.
A highly placed rebel, speaking to the AP this week, admitted that rebels were responsible. He said a unit based in the hometown of ousted President Viktor Yanukovych, made up of both Russians and Ukrainians, was involved in the firing of an SA-11 from near Snizhne. The rebel, who has direct access to the inner circle of the insurgent leadership in Donetsk, said that he could not be named because he was contradicting the rebels' official line.

[source : What happened? The day Flight 17 was downed, AP,, 25th July 2014]

Hmm. Note that this source "could not be named because he was contradicting the rebels' official line". So is he for real? Bona fide? How did Leonard and this 'rebel' make contact? etc. etc. I'm not sure we can trust this. It is too convenient.

But also mentioned in the same article is the Ukrainian counterterrorism chief, Vitaly Nayda, who had this to say about whet happened to the BUK after it allegedly shot down MH17:
As for the Buk, Nayda said, intelligence suggests it went back on the move shortly after the attack.

That very night, he said, it crossed the border, back into Russia.

Note that Nayda said the BUK was moved, but did not provide a route only that on the night of 17th July the BUK "crossed the border, back into Russia".

So who is lying? Is it:

1. The Ukraine Interior Minister who says the BUK was in Krasnodon then changed this to Luhansk, both in East Ukraine at dawn of 18th July.

2. Belling Cat who say no! The Buk was definitely in Luhansk, which according to a reference that a Belling Cat report cites states was "virtually surrounded by government troops and has come under weeks of sustained shelling that has cut off water, power and phone service, and led to daily bread lines", which begs the questions:
(i) how could the separatists transport a smoking gun BUK from Sizhne through an area infested with Kiev Nazis to reach Luhansk?
(ii) why would the separatists transport a smoking gun BUK from Sizhne to an area infested with Kiev Nazis when they could very easily transport it to Krasnodon beyond the eyes of the Kiev Nazis?

3. Or Ukrainian counterterrorism chief Vitaly Nayda who said no! It went to Russia overnight.

So who is lying?

But here is another possibility: what if the BUK was located in Luhansk when it allegedly shot down MH17? But then the Kiev Nazis would have seen it being fired.

So I ask again and again and again:
1. how could the separatists transport a smoking gun BUK from Sizhne through an area infested with Kiev Nazis to reach Luhansk?
2. why would the separatists transport a smoking gun BUK from Sizhne to an area infested with Kiev Nazis when they could very easily transport it to Krasnodon beyond the eyes of the Kiev Nazis?

The credibility of the proclaimed Belling Cat report rests on the answers to those questions.

Did the separatists use teleportation which was also provided by Russia?

Did the separatists use Jedi mind control when they encountered any Kiev Nazis, telling the Kiev Nazis, "This is not the BUK you are looking for."?

This "smoking gun BUK in Luhansk on 18th July" is getting ludicrous and dangerous The Belling Cat report rests on two very dubious points:
1. coloured squiggly lines that were drawn by the authors themselves:
2. the ludicrous suggestion that the separatists would and could transport the smoking gun BUK from Sizhne to Luhansk when Luhansk was, as a reference cited by the Belling Cat report states, virtually surrounded and being shelled by Kiev Nazis, and I suggest was also a dead end for that BUK?

And to think that that report could be driving us to WW3!!


Saturday, November 15, 2014


Here is a photo of our leaders at the G20 meeting in Brisbane (with a pleasant comment).

Note that Putin is on the edge of the photo again. I say again because there was a similar meeting of leaders in France in June, i.e. before MH17, to commemorate the landings in Northern France in 1944 during WW2, and at that meeting nobody spoke to Putin, and in those photos Putin is also at the end.

What is it about Vladimir Putin that NATO doesn't like?

Does he have bad breath? BO?

Why is he ostracised all the time?

I know what it feels like to be ostracised...but at least Putin knows why he is being ostracised. I still haven't a got a clue why I am being ostracised! As far as I am aware I haven't sacrificed any kittens to Satan, or something equally abhorrent.

But here is a clue as to why Putin is being ostracised. This is a map of the NATO Empire over time.

Note the progression and expansion of NATO over time.

From Checkpoint Charlie to Maidan, NATO has been expanding and expanding and expanding, most recently sponsoring a violent neo-Nazi coup. In contrast the former Soviet Bloc has been shrinking and shrinking and shrinking. Ukraine was once part of Russia. So how can the Prime Minister of Canada say to Putin, "I guess I’ll shake your hand but I have only one thing to say to you: you need to get out of Ukraine."?

If NATO wins in Ukraine then Syria will lose a major ally and then more than likely succumb to the sick, twisted and morally bankrupt alliance of international cutthroat Jihadis and NATO, and then the bastards who planned and executed 9/11 and all the wars since that inside job win.

That is the situation.


No slam dunk evidence has yet been provided by NATO to prove that the separatists shot down MH17 despite NATO telling us that they have the data from 'sensors', etc. Instead NATO appears to be relying on an amateur weapons expert to very slowly prove it for them by using Youtube, when they have the world's greatest military and intelligence network, including computers, to gather and analyse data and do in one day what Brown Moses has done in four months (which at the most is to suggest, and not with slam dunk evidence either, that a BUK seen in Torez and Sizhne on 17th July came from Russia).

On the other hand, Russia has stated that it has radar evidence to show that a fighter was close to MH17 when it came down, and released that data within days of MH17 coming down.

The investigation into MH17 has been rigged: one of several nations can veto any evidence shown to the investigation team and what they publish. And Kiev has taken full advantage of this by immediately grabbing the communications between ATC and MH17 and keeping them secret.

If Russia had satellite images then they would have been released by now.

So why did Russia report on a fake satellite image at this time?

I proposed it was to reduce criticism of Putin at the G20. But we know Putin. The Guardian has called him 'strongman'. Other NATO media and politicians call him a bully. He is apparently risking WW3 by allegedly invading Ukraine, sending submarines into narrow channels near Stockholm, and flying planes over Paris. He doesn't need to be helped by a fake satellite image of MH17.

So perhaps it was reported as a prank, to take the piss out of NATO?

A wild thought perhaps, but you have to start thinking outside of the box.

At stake is Ukraine, the source of Russia's influence over Europe and thus a major source of income for Russia. And Ukraine borders Russia. If NATO can grab control of Ukraine, by for example running a violent NATO-sponsored neo-Nazi coup, then NATO can plonk first strike nuclear missiles right on Russia's doorstep which could hit Moscow in minutes. This is why the USA has spent billions and billions of dollars on fomenting revolution in Ukraine for the last 20 years.

I think, if I remember correctly, that we fought the Nazis in World War 2. My grandfathers landed on Normandy beaches in June 1944 and came back psychologically broken men. Perhaps you have similar stories in your family.

I would therefore expect nobody in the UK to be supporting the neo-Nazi coup in Ukraine in any way whatsoever.

But it appears that some do...


An article in The Daily Mail supports the thesis that we are indeed degenarating, obsessed with sex rather than truth, as I experienced on 28th June this year when I turned up to find myself alone outside Freemasons Hall to protest their engineering of WW1 when in Trafalgar Square there was a celebration of blokes sticking their cocks up other blokes arses.

Much was made recently of Kim Kardashian and that obscene photograph of her bulbous bum, and how this kind of 'entertainment' was prophecised in the film Idiocracy. But what about this: two male teachers from the same school have been sent to prison for having sex with the same female student at that school! One taught English, the other taught...HISTORY!!!

What boring, irrelevant and untrue crap did that history teacher teach?

Having done some training to become a teacher I experienced life in several secondary schools of various kinds, and thus the staffrooms and teachers in those schools. I wrote briefly of my experiences, that there is some genuine concern over some students and questions asked and advice given on how to teach particular topics, but Jesus can their conversations be boring, self-centred and unquestioned regurgitated NATO propaganda. And to top it all off I have evidence that in one school I was in, that school had forced their students to write and draw pro-war propaganda to encourage people to fight in the Freemason-engineered World War One and other wars!!

And when I tried to explain to one particular teacher, who I thought and expected would be interested and concerned, just how bad the situation was I was, and have been ever since, ostracised, even though I know for a fact that they know I write this!

Sometimes I shake my head in total disbelief and despair...

So this extract from The Daily Mail report below does not surprise me at all.

Latest figures obtained by the Daily Mail from the Department for Education reveal that at least two teachers a month are banned from classrooms over ‘inappropriate relationships’ with pupils, while experts say the true scale of the problem is impossible to guess.

[source : The ultimate betrayal: As two teachers from the same school are jailed for having sex with the same 17 year old pupil, why ARE there so many predators in our staff rooms?, The Daily Mail,, 14th November 2014]

There was a report in the USA (I think) about a threesome between two female teachers and a male student. World Net Daily are following this kind of breach of trust between teacher and student.

The schools of today influence the future...and the future looks bleak.


That image published yesterday of MH17 allegedly being shot down by a fighter was fake. It was propaganda.

But it's all propaganda.

Germany started WW1? BOLLOCKS! We did.

Germany started WW2? BOLLOCKS! We did.

Osama bin Laden did 9/11? BOLLOCKS! We did.

Here is a video that should be studied and analysed and studied again and again and again. It is General Wesley Clark explaining the origin of the wars since 9/11.

Watch it.

Study it.

Look up some history.


But at least Russia doesn't engineer world wars or fly planes into their own buildings so they can invade the Middle East for oil and kill approaching a million in the process, or unleash international cutthroat Jihadis onto defenceless Syrian children and instead actively opposes them, or supports neo-Nazis as they burn people alive or shell children in Donetsk...