Tuesday, March 03, 2015


There is something insulting about the editorial in The Guardian today.

Last week I found among my DVD library a copy of Letter to Brezhnev. Remember that incredibly pro-Russia film starring several actors who went to much bigger things. But the curious sacred fact about this copy of Letter to Brezhnev was that it was distributed free by...THE GUARDIAN!!! It was in one of those campaigns in which free DVDs were given away. Several newspapers did the same thing at different times.

But there it was. Perhaps the most powerful British pro-Russia film distributed by The Guardian.

But read The Guardian today and you will not find a more rabid anti-Russia rant in a British newspaper in a 100 years.

This time the editorial takes aim at Putin's adviser Vladislav Surkov, and attacks the propaganda methods of Russia.

Behind this attack lies the assumption that The Guardian has always told the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth...always and forever. Indeed the editorial even cites that most inappropriate quotation from C P Scott:
Comment is free but facts are sacred

But since 9/11 there has been an increase in the number of wars that this nation has been involved in, and the strength of the police state against the unsuspecting British taxpayer. That is all due to the plan for war on seven nations in five years which was revealed to General Wesley Clark shortly after 9/11. The seven nations named to Clark were Iraq, Iran, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Sudan and Somalia. The first four of these were named in A Clean Break in 1996. The first two were named as the biggest threats to US national security in a document written by another Zionist organisation, The Project for a New American Century. That this plan has been advanced over 13 years, two Presidents and several Prime Ministers indicates that this is an establishment idea.

That plan was supposed to last for just five years. But by 2007 that plan was moribund, so the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia agreed that the latter would unleash cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria, Lebanon and Iran, but they were first unleashed onto Libya, with none other than The Guardian allowing the now disgraced Malcolm Rifkind to demand that UN SCR 1973 be abused to kill Gaddafi and none other than The Guardian to write editorials demanding that NATO become the air force for what turned out to be al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb. And once they had killed Gaddafi those Jihadis were smuggled into Syria, perhaps through the pipelines that the British had asked Roland Dumas to organise in 2009, two years before this all happened, indicating that the British bear some responsibility for every death that has occured in Syria in the last 4 years.

But things did not go so well in Syria. Four years later and President Bashar al Assad is still in power, and has one very powerful ally: Russia. In 2013 Prince Bandar went to Moscow to personally threaten Putin that if Putin didn't dump Assad then Bandar would unleash hell in Syria. On 21st August 2013 Bandar unleashed hell on earth in Ghouta. Bandar and his masters wanted to use that false flag to bomb the shit out of Syria so that the plan revealed to Clark could advance to Iran.

But Putin blocked that plan by arranging that Syria relinquish its chemical weapons. The Guardian was ecstatic but made no mention of the much more powerful and destructive arsenal of Israel which contains nuclear, biological and chemical weapons.

So when Putin convinced Yanukovich to sign a deal with Russia instead of with the EU/IMF, NATO unleashed their Nazis and their man Yatseniuk was handpicked by Victoria Kagan-Nuland to become PM in a coup so obvious that the pigeons in Trafalgar Square can see it!

So what has caused the establishment newspaper The Guardian to distribute for free Letter to Brezhnev but now be so anti-Russia?

One man: Vladimir Putin.

During the Cold War there was a NATO project called Operation Mockingbird in which spies would be implanted into media to promote a particular line of propaganda. That continues today.

The propaganda against Putin has become that ridiculous that last week CNN tried to suggest that Putin was Jihadi John!!

For whatever reason Putin has become the talisman of a movement that could be opposed to the evil tyranny of the Federal Reserve system of the Anglo-American Establishment that has led to so many wars and so much inequality. If this system can demonise Putin and destroy his credibility, throw so much mud that some sticks, then perhaps that movement will lose momentum.

This is why there is so much anti-Russia, anti-Putin propaganda, You could say that all news is propaganda.

Nemtsov was an expendable 1%-approval has-been.

Facts are sacred. But so too can their interpretation.

And here is another interpretation of the Nemtsov assassination: perhaps it was also a warning to Putin that the furious Anglo-American establishment can kill someone with touching distance of The Kremlin.

Sunday, March 01, 2015


The march in Moscow today was supposed to be restricted to just one suburb of Moscow and consist of just Russian anti-Putin protestors. But now, after the death of Boris Nemtsov the event is truly national and even international, and marching through the centre of Moscow to the walls of the Kremlin.

Cui bono from the murder of Nemtsov?

But look who's been arrested!! The alleged architect of the Odessa Massacre of May last year.

And look who he likes to hang out with: everybody's favourite Jihadi, Senator John McCain.

And what about this Ukraine flag in the march? It wasn't the only one.

The march has morphed from a local anti-Putin march into an international protest/funeral march against Putin. Here are the Ambassadors of UK, France and Germany on their way to leaving wreathes.

Cui bono from the murder of the 5%-approval, has-been, expendable Nemtsov?


On Friday the Conservative MP David Davis wrote a powerful article in The Guardian criticising British Intelligence of using outdated and inappropriate methods, and the Intelligence and Security Committee of being weak and timid.
It is extraordinary that Mohammed Emwazi, a man as evil and delusional as it is possible to be – a man who so callously beheads innocents in pursuit of flawed beliefs – escaped the attentions of the security services. But the fact is, we now know that he didn’t: he was known to MI5, he was known to be associating with fanatics, and he was even on a terror watchlist.

It has also been reported that MI5 tried to recruit Emwazi after it was suspected that he was attempting to join a Somali extremist group. Somehow, despite supposedly being unable to leave the country, he was still able to make his way to Syria and join Islamic State in 2013.

These failures are part of a worrying pattern.

[source : David Davis MP, If MI5 sticks to outdated tactics, Emwazi won’t be the last British security failure, The Guardian, http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/feb/27/mi5-mohammed-emwazi-security-failures-terrorists-free, 27th February 2015]

Davis highlighted several examples of where an alleged culprit in a crime of terrorism was well known to the intelligence services of their nation, citing examples in the UK, USA and France, which I must add are the same nations now interfering in Syria and Iraq due to this entity that allegedly came from nowhere, Islamic State.

But we are not talking about some part time amateur organisation who only meet down the pub for a few pints on a Thursday evening. We are talking about MI5, MI6 and GCHQ, tasked with defending the realm (and the City of London). Well actually, that is not their full role: besides defend the realm they also go on the attack for the realm.

But where has this Jihadism come from that attracted Emwazi, Adebalajo and thousands of other British Muslims who have travelled abroad to commit violence and terror against a foreign nation in the name of Islam?

And who actually benefits from their actions?

A year ago, if I said Islamic Terrorist you would have immediately thought of al Qaeda. But we created al Qaeda as a proxy force to oust the USSR from Afghanistan. But they proved so useful that the project was kept going. These terrorists were allowed to live and openly recruit in London in what is known as The Covenant of Security in which the terrorists could operate out of London as long as their actions coincided with British foreign policy. This was revealed by Nafeez Ahmed, who has now taken that thesis a bit further and shown in detail how British Intelligence is running both sides of the war on terror.
Every time there’s a terrorist attack that makes national headlines, the same talking heads seem to pop up like an obscene game of “whack-a-mole”. Often they appear one after the other across the media circuit, bobbing from celebrity television pundit to erudite newspaper outlet.

A few years ago, BBC Newsnight proudly hosted a “debate” between Maajid Nawaz, director of counter-extremism think-tank, the Quilliam Foundation, and Anjem Choudary, head of the banned Islamist group formerly known as al-Muhajiroun, which has, since its proscription, repeatedly reincarnated itself. One of its more well-known recent incarnations was "Islam4UK".

Both Nawaz and Choudary have received huge mainstream media attention, generating press headlines, and contributing to major TV news and current affairs shows. But unbeknown to most, they have one thing in common: Britain’s security services. And believe it or not, that bizarre fact explains why the Islamic State’s (IS) celebrity beheader, former west Londoner Mohammed Emwazi – aka “Jihadi John” - got to where he is now.

[source : Nafeez Ahmed, The circus: How British intelligence primed both sides of the ‘terror war’, Middle East Eye, http://www.middleeasteye.net/columns/circus-how-british-intelligence-primed-both-sides-terror-war-55293733, 27th February 2015]

Ahmed then details how the British government wrote fake books to promote violent Jihadism and used fake Jihadists as fronts for those books.

Ahmed ends with this suggestion:
If only we could round up the Quilliam and al-Muhajiroun fanatics together, shove them onto a boat, and send them all off cruising to the middle of nowhere, they could have all the fun they want “radicalising” and “deradicalising” each other to their hearts content. And we might get a little peace. And perhaps we could send their handlers with them, too.

Michael Adebalajo was known to the intelligence services as a known Jihadi and drug dealer, but he was allowed to preach on the streets of London Jihad against President Bashar al Assad of Syria.

Somehow three schoolgirls were allowed to enter Syria to join Islamic State despite one of them being in open contact with a wife of a known Islamic State fighter.

The violence in Syria was foretold in Seymour Hersh's The Redirection of 2007 in which he said that the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia had agreed that the latter would unleash cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria, Lebanon and Iran. Two years later, former French foreign minister Roland Dumas was asked by Great Britain to draw up a plan to smuggle Jihadis into Syria. NATO assisted what was essentially al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb against Gaddafi, who went on to kill Gaddafi. And then it all kicked off big time in Syria. It was at this time that known Jihadi Emwazi was allowed to travel to Syria.

This is more than a pattern. This is a deliberate policy to encourage violent Islamic terrorism against Syria.

And this is because the original plan for war and regime change in seven nations in five years as revealed to General Wesley Clark shortly after 9/11, which was the biggest false flag to provide the casus belli for those wars, had by 2007 become moribund. But the cutthroat Jihadis needed cover so that NATO could provide them weapons, finance, training and even air support, so the US State Department ran The Arab Spring which portrayed al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb in Libya in 2011 as 'freedom fighters'. This policy has continued in Syria. And is now bordering on lunatic desperation, after Prince Bandar's false flag of Ghouta failed to provoke war on Syria, with the USA giving non-existent 'moderate' Jihadis radios to call in air strikes!!!

But what happens after the war on Syria?

Do the Jihadis move onto Iran as originally planned?

Or do they return to this Disunited Fascist Queendom and pose a threat to national security, thus providing the reason for giving MI5, MI6 and GCHQ even more powers, or legalising their abuses of current laws?

This is much more than just a pattern. This is a deliberate policy to encourage violent Islamic terrorism. Hopefully David Davis will take this further. But as we are only 2 months away from a General Election there could be a bit of electioneering going on.


Nemtsov was and Navalny is deeply unpopular with the Russian people. So is Mikhail Khordokovsky. Of these three Nemtsov was the most expendable. Khordokovsky is a bona fide Rothschild agent, but Navalny is the NED's chosen one with a future in front of him, rather than behind him as was the case with Nemtsov.

A march against Putin was to be held on Sunday 1st March. But it has now somehow been turned into a Je Suis Boris march reminiscent of the Je Suis Charlie unity march in Paris.

Nemtsov was martyred, the most expendable of the anti-Putin crowd, to inject some kind of life into the unpopular and transparent Wall Street/City of London revolution to oust Putin.

Putin has 85% popularity. Nemtsov 5%.

'Nuff sed.


Now the whole world's media will be able to whip up hatred against Putin as thousands mourn for the slain martyr Boris Nemtsov, accusing Putin of cold-blooded murder when there is not a shred of evidence to support this. Even a commentator on BBC Radio 5 Live this morning said if it was someone from the Kremlin who killed Nemtsov then it has seriously backfired, thus suggesting, as many are, that Putin had nothing to gain by killing a man who in Russia was deeply unpopular and in politics a has-been. Only the Wall Street/City of London agents have benefitted. Their march is now in the spotlight.

But who's next? Navalny? Will they only realise what is happening when only Rothschild agent Mikhail Khordokovsky is left standing as he cries that Putin is killing everyone...

Saturday, February 28, 2015


How many time zones does Russia cover?


And what is the population of Russia?

Not that big actually.

But not only that: Russia has a fucking massive NUCLEAR arsenal!!

So not a nation to be subdued militarily, but economically and through provoking internal revolution. That's what happened in 1917 when the Warburgs sent in Lenin on a sealed train and the British unleashed Trotsky, er, I mean, Bronstien.

After that these two clowns gave Wall Street the bulk of the contracts to rebuild Russia, and then just as Trotsky was about to take control Stalin took over, but he continued the cosy relationship between the USSR and Wall Street.

But Putin has shown some resistance, particularly over Syria.

So now?

Enter bona fide agent of Wall Street and the City of London, Alexy Navalny...

1st March was supposed to be his big day through a march against Putin. But nobody knew about it. But now, thanks to the death of Nemtsov, he, Navalny, can use the funeral procession.

Henceforth let this day, 1st March, be known as Navalny Day!!


The Nazis invaded the Soviet Union in June 1941 in Operation Barbarossa. Dmitri Shostakovich was the most loved Russian composer at the time. He lived in and around Leningrad and Moscow, and mucked in by becoming a firefighter during WW2. During WW2 he also wrote symphonies 7,8 and 9. This is Symphony No. 8, which I think sums up the barbarity of world war, particularly one started by the Nazis who were creations of Wall Street and The City of London.

Don't be disappointed or surprised if you can't listen to it all the first time. It is soul destroying. But there are some sad and/or fantastic bits, such as the cor anglais solo at 18 minutes into the first movement.

This is a tour de force of world war 2, and is what East Ukraine has been going through for over a year now as the Kiev Nazis lay siege to their resistance to the NATO Nazi coup.

Shostakovich: Symphony No.8 in C minor


I thought that only the Syrian people would decide who will lead them. In 2013 it was found by NATO that President Bashar al Assad had 80% of the Syrian people supporting him, 10% were supporting the Jihadis and 10% were neutral. This is why there has been a massive invasion of Syria by international cutthroat Jihadis for over 4 years: the Syrian people want or prefer Assad. If the Syrian people wanted Assad out he would have gone by now. Nobody would have fought in the Syrian Arab Army against the international cutthroat Jihadis. If the Syrian people wanted Assad out then they would have welcomed the international cutthroat Jihadis, not joined the SAA and killed the international cutthroat Jihadis.

The Syrian people either want or prefer Assad.

But Phil Hammond knows best, and he has decided for the Syrian people!!!

And his decision is that Assad cannot be the future of Syria...and that Assad cannot help in the destruction of Islamic State in his own country, Syria!!!

Britain’s Foreign Secretary Philip Hammond and his French counterpart, Laurent Fabius, said Syrian President Bashar al-Assad must not be part of any future government or participate in the US-led alliance against Islamic State.

[source : ‘Assad cannot be Syria’s future’ – UK & French foreign ministers, RT, http://rt.com/uk/236215-hammond-assad-syrias-future/, 27th February 2015]

This is British Imperialism of the 19th Century reincarnated. That old stiff upper lip, tally ho, jolly spiffing private school/Oxbridge breeding never went away, did it? The uncivilised natives cannot rule themselves, can they?


This scene from A Room With a View contains everything that the system wants destroyed and is trying to destroy: destroy beautiful landscapes through war; destroy love and romance through pornography and feminism; destroy powerful, emotional music through repetative noise; destroy spontaneity through conformity.

The system wants microchipped, emotionless controllable cyborgs prepared to kill others and destroy land.

This is why this scene is one of my favourite scenes in cinematic history.

Sadly this doesn't contain the previous scene in which the dull, dour George is inspired by the landscape to shout "Beauty!", "Truth!" while up a tree.

Room With a View - That Kiss in an Italian Poppy Field


Electronic - Getting Away With It



There was supposed to be a march against Putin in Moscow on Sunday 1st March. That march was organised by Alexy Navalny, agent of Wall Street and The City of London. But according to Newsweek over 80% of Muscovites were unaware of this march.

But that march has now been cancelled and a vigil will occur instead.

This change has occured because of the assassination of Boris Nemtsov.

Like Navalny, Nemtsov was a critic of Putin. Nemtsov was also one of the reformers who sold Russia on the cheap to the west after the fall of the Berlin Wall. He may have outlived his usefulness and like Litvinenko was more useful to Wall Street and The City of London dead, shot just yards from The Kremlin, and giving Navalny great exposure.


Sir John Sawers was head of MI6 from 1st November 2009 to 1st November 2014.

Former French foreign minister Roland Dumas in 2013 said that in 2009 he was approached by British officials and asked to organise the smuggling of Jihadis into Syria. In 2011 The (fake) Arab Spring began in Syria and Jihadis began to emerge en masse in Syria after Gaddafi was assassinated.

So was Dumas asked by Sawers? Or Scarlett, Sawers' predecessor?

Whatever. The British helped to plan if not direct the war in Syria as per The Redirection agreed between the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia in which the latter would unleash cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria, Iran and Lebanon.

No wonder Sawers has been in the media so much in the last few days since the identity of Jihadi John was been released, defending the role of MI6. Sawers is in big trouble. He is responsible for the flow of British Jihadis into Syria to fuel the violence in Syria. The violence in Syria occured on Sawers' watch.

And he is now deflecting focus away from Syria, i.e. his responsibility, onto Russia.

Friday, February 27, 2015


Alexander Litvinenko worked for MI6. Andrei Lugovoi stated it but it was denied for years. The British government tried to stop and is still trying to stop information about the links between Litvinenko and MI6 being revealed, which is why so much of the inquiry into Litvinenko is being heard in secret, and some information is remaining secret.

But what did Litvinenko do for MI6?

Allegedly it was work as a 'consultant'. But when you read some of the shite he wrote then it is clear that one of his duties for MI6 was to write anti-Putin propaganda. One such line of attack was to blame Islamic extremism on Putin, and Litvinenko even went so far to suggest that Russia did 9/11!!

Never mind The Covenant of Security.

Never mind that it is on record that we created al Qaeda.

In Litvinenko-Land, Putin was the devil incarnate.

So is it any wonder that CNN, i.e. CIA, tried a sneaky stunt to suggest that behind the mask of Jihadi John was none other than...Ji-Vladi John.

This is Litvinenko-esque anti-Putin propaganda. Just last week NATO accused Putin of being everything bad: a paedo; a wife-beater; a drunken letch; plastic surgery.

CNN apologized Friday for mistakenly parading Russian President Vladimir Putin’s image in its Who-is-Jihadi-John report. The blooper happened as the world media raced to identify the Islamic State killer nicknamed Jihadi John, RT reports.

Thursday’s report by Max Foster from the London office of CNN International was supposed to reveal the identity of Jihadi John, a young British man who is believed to have executed a number of Islamic State hostages.

Yet, as his report was going into its fourth minute, the on-air gallery depicting a masked man in black robes with a knife in his hand gave way to the image of the Russian president.

СNN called the incident a technical failure.

[source : CNN Apologizes for Putin Blooper, Sputnik, http://sputniknews.com/us/20150227/1018826192.html, 27th February 2015]

This adds to the 'technical failure' of the real Jihadi John being allowed to go to Syria.


Given that:
1. in 2009 the British asked former French foreign minister to organise the smuggling of Jihadis into Syria;
2. Jihadi John was a known Jihadi and was harassed into becoming a spy for MI5 (leading to an allegation of attempted strangling!).

why was Jihadi John allowed to go to Syria as the war against the Syrian Arab Army was at its maximum?

I shall answer for them.

Jihadi John was allowed to go to Syria because it is current British foreign policy to oust President Bashar al Assad through the use of a proxy force of international cutthroat Jihadis. Those Jihadis require a bit of Jihadi lurve which is why those 3 schoolgirls were allowed to go to Syria despite one of them being in open contact with a known Islamic State wife. This is also why Michael Adebalajo was allowed to preach Jihad against Assad despite being a known Jihadi AND a known drug dealer.

This plan to oust Assad by the use of international cutthroat Jihadis was hatched in 2007 and was reported by Seymour Hersh in an article he wrote entitled The Redirection.

And this plan was hatched because the original plan for war and regime change in seven nations in five years revealed to General Wesley Clark was by 2007 moribund. The seven nations named to Clark were Iraq, Iran, Syria and Lebanon, with Libya, Sudan and Somalia.

Thursday, February 26, 2015


It's Over - The Funk Masters (Original 12'' Version)


Change - The Glow of Love


And this goes some way to explain why Syriza were not portrayed as devils and demons and have been given the chance to save the EU (which was my scepticism).

Having recently spent time in several modern secondary schools I know for a fact that pro-EU and pro-world governance is being promoted and that core subjects like mathematics are being neglected in favour of this lunacy. And it is also being promoted in teacher training.

Another aspect of the future world is the man-machine, the cyborg. Posters in computer labs in modern secondary schools ask questions like, "Could a robot be your best friend?" and promote computers as man's best friend. This is preparation for linking all humans to the world brain via the implantable microchip.


The parallels are sadly familiar:
A non-white British Muslim is suspected of being associated with al Shabaab and is harassed to work for MI5, but he refuses and claims he was even strangled as a consequence to intimidate him. He then goes on to become notorious for a barbaric crime.

Is this a deliberate policy?


I watched Citizenfour last night. It was shown on Channel 4, the same channel that is pushing the NATO gay agenda with their flagship wildly gay series entitled Cucumber (no, it's not a gardening programme hosted by Alan Titchmarsh).

Citizenfour won an Oscar last weekend for best documentary.

I found it rather boring, with hints of vanity that permeated Jeremy Scahill's Dirty Wars.

And nobody has yet explained to me why it was The Guardian and The Washington Post who were at the front of the pack reporting The Snowden Revelations, implying that they really, really care about us, when it is those same two NATO/Establishment media flagships who always without fail at the front of the pack demanding war, demands that have eventually led to the creation of Islamic State and all their headsawing.

Why is Greenwald still sitting on most of the alleged NSA 'bombshells'?

Was it just a coincidence that the Snowden Revelations were reported at the same time that Obama was resisting calls to bomb Syria and al Qaeda has morphed into the medieval barbaric Islamic State?

Why has nobody gone to jail and the spying agencies are being given more and stronger spying powers?

And why do these people find it more important that we are told we are being spied on (a fact we knew already due to Echelon) when they ignore the 9/11 elephant in the living room that has led to the deaths of approaching a million civilians and the rise of Islamic State in every nation we have invaded since 9/11?

To paraphrase Greenwald: Surveillance breeds conformity. Very few people are protesting this mass surveillance. Is that because they are scared of being identified after being told that we are all spied on? Or because they agree that the spying agencies are just doing their job, keeping us 'safe' from terrorists that the spying agencies control? Or is it because they couldn't give a flying f...?

Wednesday, February 25, 2015


According to the ONS nearly 700,000 people are on zero hours contracts. Assume that half of those are married with a family of 2 children and are the only earner and that's 350,000 families and 700,000 children who are unsure of where their next meal is coming from or if they will be homeless next week.

Meanwhile Members of The Marsten House are whoring themselves out while they vote for wars which have resulted in the emergence of Islamic State.

From what I see of activity in The Marsten House there are an awfully large number of empty seats except for PMQT and debates of any consequence, e.g. war. The attendance to the 'debate' on money last month, the first in 170 years, was pathetic.

Stick Members of The Marsten House on Zero Hours Contracts.


If you are wondering how three schoolgirls were able to slip past border and security guards on their way to Syria, particularly after one of them had been in open contact with a wife of a fighter for Islamic State, then wonder no more.

From Great Britain at least, this a contender for TTS Report of the Year.

"The Iraqi Parliament's National Security and Defense Committee has access to the photos of both planes that are British and have crashed while they were carrying weapons for the ISIL," Head of the committee Hakem al-Zameli said, according to a Monday report of the Arabic-language information center of the Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq.

He said the Iraqi parliament has asked London for explanations in this regard.

The senior Iraqi legislator further unveiled that the government in Baghdad is receiving daily reports from people and security forces in al-Anbar province on numerous flights by the US-led coalition planes that airdrop weapons and supplies for ISIL in terrorist-held areas.

The Iraqi lawmaker further noted the cause of such western aids to the terrorist group, and explained that the US prefers a chaotic situation in Anbar Province which is near the cities of Karbala and Baghdad as it does not want the ISIL crisis to come to an end.

[source : Iraqi Army Downs 2 UK Planes Carrying Weapons for ISIL, FARS News Agency, http://english.farsnews.com/newstext.aspx?nn=13931204001534, 23rd February 2015]

Just last week it was reported that selected 'moderate' Syrian rebels will be given radios to call in the US military for air strikes on targets provided those rebels. But will no questions be asked? Any evidence required?

The facts are:
1. there are virtually no 'moderate' rebels in Syria, most having allied with or joined al Qaeda or Islamic State because they pay in crisp American dollar notes;
2. the war in Syria is to oust Assad so that a pipeline from the Pars field running from Qatar through, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Syria to Turkey and on to Europe can be built to threaten Russia's global influence. Israel wants a branch of this pipeline. Assad is against this pipeline and wants an alternative pipeline from Iran through Iraq, Syria and Lebanon onto Europe without threatening Russia's business in Europe.


There doesn't seem to be that many cheers from the anti-austerity side for the deal reached between Greece and the Eurogroup.

The Greek Solidarity Campaign has only referenced an article that buying time is not surrender, but no wild, ecstatic cheers.

But it's all gone quiet over there. Varoufakis' plan was vague in some areas but not so vague in others. Still, the Eurogroup accepted the plan very quickly.

And here is what WSWS thinks:
Varoufakis’ paper comes as no surprise to those who have followed the politics of Syriza. It originates from a man and a government that from the beginning saw their task as saving the EU and European capitalism. Like its predecessors, the Syriza government has submitted to the dictates of the EU and the financial markets, who even after five years of brutal austerity, demand ever more sacrifices from the Greek population.

Tuesday, February 24, 2015


In the second half the new Greek government did not come back as hoped and expected.

But the contest is over two legs. This was just the first. The second is in 4 to 5 months time.

In the plan submitted to the Eurogroup the new Greek government has reneged on several significant promises and is actually going into even more debt. They have targeted tax dodging as a major source of revenue, but here will be many more job losses as the number and size of government departments is reduced significantly, and privatisations will continue.

Personally, not impressed and could be described as Thatcherism-lite if it wasn't for the tax evasion policy.

If it was me I would told them to stick their Euro up their arses and done a deal with Russia.

But for whatever reason the new Greek government is siding with the nations who are driving the Kiev Nazis!!

A very, very curious state of affairs.


So in addition to APCs this Disunited Fascist Queendom is also sending troops to Ukraine!!!


But you can bet that MI6 have been in there from the start, advising this and arranging that and paying for the other.

NATO wants Ukraine. It really is that simple. And their geek Yats is Prime Minister.


Turkey has been allowing any international cutthroat Jihadi dupe prepared to sacrifice their lives for ZioNATO in a 'war' in Syria to travel through their extremely porous borders into and out of Syria, and on occasions bombing Syrian military positions to provide cover for them as they enter Syria illegally in their bloodthirsty quest to slit the throats of Syrian children.

Turkey is also a member of NATO, so can you imagine how NATO would treat having a border with Russia through Ukraine?

Anyway, there was a recent invasion of Syria by Turkey to allegedly visit a tomb. Islamic State did not interfere.

And when Islamic State held Kobane, Turkey didn't interfere.

A case of, you don't slit my throat and I won't slit yours.

The war in Syria is all about building a pipeline from the Pars gas field from Qatar through Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Syria and Turkey, then onto Europe to threaten Russia's business with and thus influence over Europe.


Here is how Rotten Rifkind has voted on selected topics (all data from The Work For You):
1. Voted strongly against increasing the tax rate applied to income over £150,000 (Hmm. I wonder why?)
2. Voted strongly against a banker’s bonus tax
3. Voted moderately for reducing housing benefit for social tenants deemed to have excess bedrooms (which Labour describe as the "bedroom tax")
4. Voted very strongly against raising welfare benefits at least in line with prices
5. Voted moderately for a reduction in spending on welfare benefits
6. Voted very strongly for replacing Trident with a new nuclear weapons system
7. Voted very strongly for the privatisation of Royal Mail
8. Voted strongly for allowing national security sensitive evidence to be put before courts in secret sessions
9. Voted strongly against a wholly elected House of Lords
10. Voted very strongly for raising England’s undergraduate tuition fee cap to £9,000 per year
11. Voted for war on Iraq, Libya and Syria (as per the plan for war and regime change on seven nations in five years).

In other words, a greedy, heartless warmongering nasty piece of work, out for Number One and The City of London.

A typical Tory!!!

But to his credit:
1. Voted very strongly for an investigation into the Iraq war (having voted for it so this could just be showing some concern that he was lied to when in fact he knew all along the war was based on lies and a decades old plan);
2. Voted strongly against introducing ID cards.

Monday, February 23, 2015


Rifkind was also at the front of the pack demanding that the UN SCR 1973 be immediately turned into a Get Gaddafi campaign. He was allowed to do so in...The Guardian.

A few months later you could read editorials demanding that NATO become the Libyan Jihadi Air Force in...The Guardian.

D'you catch my drift?


The French aircraft carrier Charles de Gaulle has joined the war on Islamic State.

But why?

France announced sending the Charles de Gaulle aircraft carrier for use in military operations against the Islamic State in Iraq in mid-January. The decision was made in the wake of the deadly Paris attacks, when Islamist gunmen killed 17 people at the offices of the satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo and a kosher supermarket.

French President Francois Hollande told military personnel back then that the Charlie Hebdo massacre “justifies the presence of our aircraft carrier.”

France joined the US-led coalition carrying out air strikes against IS militants in Iraq in September. It has declined to participate in the aerial campaign against the group in Syria, where the government of President Bashar Assad has condemned the attacks on Syrian territory.

[source : France deploys aircraft carrier against ISIS in Iraq - ministry, RT, http://rt.com/news/234647-france-deploys-aircraft-carrier/, 23rd February 2014]

So although France had declared that it was joining the war on Islamic State in September last year it had done very little about it, and was in fact showing signs of some independence from NATO in supporting Palestinian independence and suggesting that the sanctions on Russia be stopped.

But all that changed after the suspicious Charlie Hebdo attack...


Check this out:

Devastating, huh?

Well, it might be if we could actually watch it ourselves.

But it looks like only one newspaper has been given access to this video: News Corp Australia.

But who owns and runs News Corp Australia? THE MURDOCHS!

In other words Bilderberg.

Why was this alleged video allegedly shown only to an Australian media organisation owned and run by Bilderberg's very own Murdoch family?

And just to indicate what is going on here, the article contains a photograph of two men in uniform sitting on some wreckage of some kind with the top piece with Malaysia in big letters and airlines in smaller letters visible between the two men and the letters MH visible at the far right of the photograph. So when and where was this photo taken? We are not told, only that the source of the photo was Twitter, so it could be and probably is 100% fake.

If this video exists and is so devastating then why is it not being shown in public? Instead, like the data the USA says it has, we get a second hand interpretation of the primary evidence rather than the primary evidence itself. So:
1. the USA says it has data from 'sensors' proving that MH17 was shot down by separatists and does not release it but instead produces an image of an arc and a straight line intercepting;
2. now Bilderberg Murdoch's News Corp Australia has allegedly been shown devastating video which would prove the separatists shot down MH17, but we can't see that either and are only told of its alleged contents, and curiously it is not being shown to the victims families either.

I'll believe this video when I see it.

Until then I'll believe the many eyewitnesses who state on camera that fighter jets were close to MH17 when it was shot down, particularly as the Ukraine Air Force is being suspiciously coy about their activities on 17th July 2014, and their activities and the locations of Ukraine's BUKs are being ignored by NATO media and their gimps.


How can the Chairman of the Intelligence and Security Committee have any free time at all, particularly as he is also a Member of Parliament, and also paid a salary with expenses because of that?

It should be an honour to be in that position not an opportunity to whore yourself.


Citizenfour based on Ed Snowden has won the Oscar 2015 for Best Documentary.

As The Guardian reports:
Citizenfour chronicles the revelations by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden that burgeoned into the wider NDA spying scandal. The Guardian and the Washington Post simultaneously began publishing Snowden’s leaked information in June 2013, with both publications winning a Pulitzer prize in 2014 for Public Service journalism.

[source : Edward Snowden documentary Citizenfour wins Oscar , The Guardian, http://www.theguardian.com/film/2015/feb/23/edward-snowden-documentary-citizenfour-wins-oscar, 23rd February 2015]

No. Don't laugh. That really is referring to the Establishment/NATO media flagships The Washington Post and The Guardian, the same The Washington Post and The Guardian who routinely are at the front of the pack demanding wars while not telling us of the plan revealed to General Wesley Clark for war and regime change in seven countries in five years.

They only tell you what they want you to hear.

And to paraphrase Glenn Greenwald (who is still sitting on 99% of the Snowden 'leaks'):
Surveillance breeds conformity.

In other words, if people know they are being spied on then they will behave, be 'good' citizens, not protest, do as they are told, act as expected etc.

I mean, where are the mass protests against all this surveillance?

And Snowden has also been used to demand yet more surveillance powers because, the spies say, he has been assisting al Qaeda by revealing how we are spied on, when it was we who created, nurtured and protected al Qaeda through a Covenant of Security, and have created a monster in Islamic State by encouraging Jihadis to go to Iraq and Syria who will become a threat to national security when they return!

It's like MH17 and all the contradictory claims of who allegedly shot the BUK missile from which location while many eyewitness statements of fighter jets close to MH17 are ignored and the activities of the Ukraine Air Force and Ukraine's BUKs are also ignored: A FARCE!!

I wonder what happened to all those reports about Whitehall and Buckingham Palace kiddie-fiddling...

Sunday, February 22, 2015


This question was asked on Sky News today: does the UK export terror?

My answer would be another question: does a bear shit in the woods?

Of course they do!!!

Those three girls that the media is currently so concerned about were allowed to go to Syria to become wives of Jihadis to keep them going and keep up the morale of Islamic State Jihadis.

But if the media would expose The Covenant of Security between MI5 and the Islamic terrorists who serve British foreign policy then we would not be reading about such girls. The fact is it is current British foreign policy to see President Assad of Syria ousted because he is blocking a pipeline from the Pars field from Qatar to Europe that will threaten Russia's business with and thus influence over Europe. We began planning unleashing these Jihadis onto Syria as early as 2009 but I suspect 2007, and maybe even a year or two earlier than that when it was realised that the invasion of Iraq was not going as smoothly as planned. Michael Adebalajo was allowed to preach Jihad against Assad on the streets of London even though he was suspected of being involved in Jihad already and of dealing drugs.

Read this in The Guardian:
The contact with Aqsa Mahmood, whose social media use is supposedly under surveillance by counter-terror agencies, came two days before Begum slipped out of her east London home and met up with her two schoolfriends.

A Twitter account thought to be linked to Begum shows that she contacted Mahmood, a prominent online advocate of Isis, on 15 February, saying: “follow me so i can dm you back”.

Aamer Anwar, a lawyer for Mahmood’s family, said on Sunday they were “incredulous” that the contact could go unnoticed by Scotland Yard and other counter-terror agencies.

“We are aware from contact with Special Branch and the police that her social media contact is regularly checked and regularly monitored,” he told the BBC.

“The idea that a young 15-year-old should make contact with Aqsa, who’s regarded as a terrorist, yet no action is taken – the family of that young girl do not have the customary knock on the front door.

“The fact that these three girls manage to reach the airport – the common sense approach of Special Branch at the airport, the UK border agencies, don’t notice the fact that two 15-year-olds [and] a 16-year-old are unaccompanied, going on a flight to Turkey, the staging post to Syria, which is what Aqsa did herself and they aren’t stopped.

“Obviously the family are deeply distressed and angry and they want answers because they’re thinking ‘how many other families is this happening to?’”

[source : Syria-bound missing schoolgirl's father urges her not to fall into clutches of Isis, The Guardian, http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/feb/22/uk-counter-terror-officials-criticised-syria-bound-london-schoolgirls, 22nd February 2015


A ceasefire in Ukraine was agreed just over a week ago and besides Debaltsove, which is now decided, the ceasefire held.

But just as this was happening the British government whined that Russia was buzzing the RAF, when in fact Russia has always filed its flight plans in full accordance with international regulations.

We also sent armored PCs to Ukraine, begging the question why.

The USA is still sending troops to Ukraine.

And as reported yesterday Kiev was planning for all out war.


So today what happens? There is a terrorist attack on a march by neo-Nazis in Kharkiv. Immediately the suspects were arrested and allegedly admitted to being trained in Russia and used Russian explosives.

Aha. Case closed.

Or is it?

Because also this week was the one year anniversary of the neo-Nazi Kiev putsch and the Maidan Massacre. And we now have a much a better idea of who executed the Maidan Massacre: the neo-Nazi hierarchy, and I would suggest in league with NATO Gladio agents.

So do not assume that Russia did this. It is perfectly feasible that the neo-Nazis did this. They have form. And as always with a crime you should ask: cui bono?

Who yesterday admitted to preparing for all out war and thus needed a casus belli?

Answer: Kiev!!

Saturday, February 21, 2015


So as suspected the current ceasefire was just yet another trick and delaying tactic.

And kinda explains why we sent armored PCs and the USA is still sending troops to Ukraine.


Have you seen this in that Belling Cat report accusing Russia of bombing Ukraine?
In reality, the trajectory of the projectile is determined by a variety of factors, such as the type and hardness of the ground struck, wind direction and speed, and the type of projectile. Our team adopted a simple linear trajectory in our analysis, but the actual trajectory may vary somewhat due to these factors.

[source : Origin of Artillery Attacks on Ukrainian Military Positions in Eastern Ukraine between 14 July 2014 and 8 August 2014 : A bell¿ngcat Investigation, Page 4]

"...but the actual trajectory may vary somewhat..."?

WTF does that mean?

Readers will note that:
1. the time of these alleged attacks is in July and August last year, so NATO has had months to look into these allegations using their rinky dinky super duper technology and military analyst teams consisting of people who have actually been on the battlefield and actually used these weapons and/or seen these weapons being used;
2. and if they had found evidence that Russia had bombed Ukraine then I am supremely confident that Samantha Power would have produced an Adlai Stevenson moment at the UN SC.

But I don't recall seeing or hearing of such a moment on the BBC or Sky News. Do you?

And readers must also recall that Belling Cat said something similar in an earlier report about a film of a BUK being transported through Luhansk at what looks like dawn. But dawn on what day? Well, the Ukraine Security Service says it was at dawn on 18th July 2014. But what do Belling Cat say?
While it is not possible to discern the exact time this video was filmed...

In this Belling Cat are 100% correct. You can't trust the Kiev Nazis of the Ukraine Security Service. And Belling Cat should know!!!! Because Belling Cat believe that MH17 was shot down by a BUK missile launched from a field 5 Km south of Shnizhne, but the Kiev Nazis actually released tapes on YouTube within hours of MH17 being shot down that they say prove 100% beyond doubt that MH17 was shot down by Cossacks from Chernukino!! So if Belling Cat believe that MH17 was shot down from south of Shnizhne then surely to God they must believe those tapes to be a cruel fraud and that therefore the Kiev Nazis cannot be trusted on anything.

And all these contradictory claims are contradicted even further by the reports of Correctiv and Der Spiegel which are based on 'eyewitnesses' (who suspiciously will not go on camera) stating that a missile was fired from a field 3 Km north of Shnizhne, and those reports were written in partnership with and proclaimed by Belling Cat, even though they contradict everything else produced before!!!


Why do the likes of the US State Department and NATO embassies always point to Belling Cat rather than their own highly qualified military intelligence assets who are not saying anything?

I say, save some money and fire (no pun intended) all NATO military intelligence units!! They obviously can't do their job.

And all the while Belling Cat refuse to even acknowledge the many videos of eyewitnesses prepared to go on camera (in contrast to those of Der Spiegel who were not prepared to go on camera) to state that they saw Ukrainian fighter jets close to MH17 when it was shot down and that the Ukraine Air Force is being suspiciously coy about their activities on 17th July 2014.

I'm sorry. He's trying his best to make a living to support his wife and children and all that, but the vanity of Eliot Higgins has reached a new low (or is it high?) with this report, and he should ask who is running him. NATO military intelligence units, fully trained military professionals with combat experience and superior knowledge of how these weapons work, have had months to analyse images from satellites, sensors (whatever they are), social media and even Google Maps (which is actually NSA/CIA) of all the military activity in that area at that time, and I'm sure that if there was conclusive evidence that Russia had bombed Ukraine then there would have been an Adlai Stevenson moment at the UN SC from warmonger Samantha Power.

But such an Adlai Stevenson moment has not occured.

So readers can draw their own conclusions.

However, Higgins may just have provided another stepping stone to WW3 through his naivete and vanity. So well done to him.


I'd say that at half-time Greece is losing but can come back from 3 -1 down.


With all the media frenzy focusing on who killed Lucy Beale in Eastenders, it was quietly reported this week that selected Syrian rebels will be given radios to contact the USA military and call in air strikes on targets that the rebels think should be bombed. The alleged belief is that the moderate rebels, if they exist, will only call in air strikes on Islamic State positions.

But do you really think that will happen?

Do moderate rebels actually exist?

And if so then to whom are they loyal?

Tony Cartalucci has identified how Islamic State will be used to provoke a war on Syria: there are no moderate rebels; so whoever gets the radios will call in air strikes on Syrian military positions; and when that happens how will the Syrian military respond? And how will the USA respond to that response?

I was suggesting in summer last year that Islamic State were created in order to be used to get at Assad in whatever way would work, and that American bombers would soon be bombing Syrian military accidentally on purpose to provoke retaliation from the Syrian military, but I never once believed that the rebels would actually be given radios to call in those air strikes to provide some (im)plausible deniability!!

But Tony has nailed it: this will probably provoke war on Syria...as the warmongers have been wanting since at least 1991 when Paul Wolfowitz told General Wesley Clark that the USA had 5 to 10 years to take out those old Soviet client regimes: Iraq, Iran and Syria. These 3 nations with Hezbollah were then named in A Clean Break in 1996, then also in Rebuilding America's Defenses in 2000, then 9/11 was engineered to provide the casus belli, then the plan for war on seven nations in five years was revealed to Clark was implemented: Iraq, Iran, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Sudan and Somalia. But by 2007 this Plan A was moribund so Plan B was agreed between the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia that the latter would unleash cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria, Lebanon and Iran. But that has not worked because after 4 years Assad is still in power.

So we now have this Plan C.3 in which Islamic State's allies will be given radios to call in air strikes.

But air strikes on whom?

Islamic State or Assad?

It will obviously be on Assad.

But who will give a fuck when Fifty Shades of Grey will be out on DVD when all this is happening.

...Clearly then, if all the “moderate rebels” the US claims are in Syria have in fact long-ago pledged allegiance to Al Qaeda, then US airstrikes called in by these militants will essentially be airstrikes called in by Al Qaeda against the only legitimate forces in the region actually fighting terrorism.

The creation of ISIS, just like during the US occupation of Iraq where Al Qaeda created the “Islamic State of Iraq” to maintain plausible deniability, is simply an attempt to build distance between the Al Qaeda terrorists the US is directly arming and will soon be providing air cover for, and the overt atrocities being carried out by these very same terrorists.

While ISIS is currently being touted by the US as the pretext upon which this recent move is predicated, the reality is instead that America and its allies are simply “easing into” a direct military confrontation with the Syrian Arab Army.

As US airstrikes begin hitting Syrian positions, it is likely that eventually Syria or its allies will retaliate and provoke a wider and more direct campaign against Damascus itself. Should Syria and its allies resist striking back, the US is likely to manufacture a provocation anyway.

Barring Syria and its allies’ ability to provide sufficient deterrence against the beginning of this latest, most dangerous, and most desperate yet leg of America’s war on Syria, and should Syrian defenses be incapable of staving off a Libyan-style NATO operation that has left that nation entirely in the hands of ISIS, expect to see yet another nation handed directly over to extremists – intentionally – for the sole purpose of continuing this proxy crusade next into Lebanon and Iran, then into southern Russia and western China.

[source : Tony Cartalucci, US “Easing Into” War with Syria Using ISIS Boogeyman, http://journal-neo.org/2015/02/21/us-easing-into-war-with-syria-using-isis-boogeyman/, 21st February 2015]

Friday, February 20, 2015


Besides run paedos and cover up their abuses, and murder mothers of future Kings of England, what does British Military Intelligence actually do?

I ask this because it has apparently been left to a former bank clerk from Leicester, who taught himself weapons, to prove using the internet that Russia attacked Ukraine from Russian soil. And he actually wrote an article in The Guardian praising his own report!!

You would expect that British Military Intelligence would be:
a) observing the Russia-Ukraine border very, very closely at this particular time in history;
b) analysing all possible intelligence, human, satellites, phone calls, social media etc.
c) causing international scenes, such as Adlai Stevenson did at the UN SC when he presented evidence of Soviet missiles in Cuba, that "wait until hell freezes over" speech, if Russia had attacked Ukraine.

After all, it is their job, to protect the Kingdom. Or has this extremely important job now been delegated to a former bank clerk from Leicester?

However, I do not recall seeing or hearing of such a Stevenson moment at the UN or even press conference regarding Russia actually attacking Ukraine.

All I see is an author of a report claiming Russia attacked Ukraine praising his own report in The Guardian.

Of course, I'll change my mind if someone like British Military Intelligence or their allies provides evidence...

Here is Stevenson preparing to wait until hell freezes over and presenting the evidence:

If you have the evidence from professionals using super duper rinky dinky technology then why not do this instead of relying on a bunch of amateurs who use the internet?



Or it never happened?


Vladimir Putin has somehow become the figurehead of this apparently anti-Anglo-American Establishment movement called BRICS. As a consequence Putin is the target of outrageous propaganda and provocations, and I would also suggest assassination attempts, the most famous perhaps being 17th July 2014.

For those who do not quite understand why BRICS and their new international development bank is such a threat to the Anglo-American Establishment: shame on you!

Too busy reading Fifty Shades of Grey and similar stuff?

Basically The Federal Reserve of The United States was established by an Anglophile cabal in the United States, has been creating money out of nothing for over a century to finance tyrants and world wars, and is the dominant force in the IMF and World Bank apparatus that has controlled international finance for decades.

So how has this apparatus done so far?

Well, just look around you: shite!!! Poverty for most and an incredibly astronomically wealthy 0.00001%.

I hope that BRICS have formed as a scheme to help a significant percentage of the human race rather than just be an alternative.

The Russian State Duma has ratified the $100 billion BRICS bank that’ll serve as a pool of money for infrastructure projects in Russia, Brazil, India, China and South Africa, and challenge the dominance of the Western-led World Bank and the IMF.

...The decision to establish the BRICS bank, along with a $100 billion reserve currency pool, was made in July 2014.

[source : Russia ratifies $100bn BRICS New Development Bank, RT, http://rt.com/business/234027-russia-ratifies-brics-bank/, 20th February 2015]

Readers should note that last quoted sentence.

This bank was agreed a few days before 17th July 2014.

Putin was on his way back to Russia from making that agreement when a rumour began to circulate that he was to land in Rostov.

The paths of MH17 and Putin crossed over Poland.

Putin's official plane would look very similar to MH17 to a Ukrainian pilot of a SU25 from the 299 Squadron who supported the Kiev Nazis...

And if I am wrong then perhaps the Ukraine Air Force can tell us what they were all doing on 17th July 2014...


Remember in junior school when a few kids began to fight and someone would shout, "Fight!"?

Well, it's kicking off over at Elliot Higgins' twitter!!

Sputnik ran a report on an article in The Guardian which looked at Higgins' latest report issued through Belling Cat which Belling Cat says proves that Russia fired from Russian territory into Ukraine.

The Sputnik report asks this perfectly valid question:
Asked about the central claims made in the study that his group of unpaid "citizen journalists" had found evidence of direct Russian military attacks on the Ukrainian army when NATO and the Western powers had been unable to produce a single piece of credible evidence to support that, Higgins replied, "Maybe they have, and weren't sharing it, but I couldn't really speak on behalf of the intelligence services in that regard."

[source : Guardian Corrects Anti-Russian Story Based on 'Research' of Own Reporter, Sputnik, http://sputniknews.com/military/20150219/1018504330.html, 19th February 2015]

Hmm. Yes, it is very curious that NATO would withhold such evidence...if they had it!!

And the same argument and question applies to MH17. In the case of MH17 NATO, i.e. USA, says it has the data to prove that separatists shot down MH17 from Shnizhne but has curiously kept that data secret and instead released a very childish image of an arc and straight line intercepting over Donetsk which they say is based on that data. I mocked that image yesterday as devastatingly persuasive. And it must be remembered that that image contradicts the initial claims of the Ukraine Security Service, who say MH17 was shot down by Cossacks from Chernukino, and that regarding Shnizhne as the launch site, Belling Cat believe that a field 5 Km south of Shnizhne was the launch site while Der Spiegel and Correctiv (in collaboration with Belling Cat!!) produced flashy reports suggesting that based on eyewitnesses a field 3 Km north of Shnizhne was in fact the launch site.

It is all such a farce and would be comical if 298 people had not been killed.

But do Belling Cat not find it the least bit curious that NATO, repeat NATO, i.e. the USA, UK, Germany, Canada etc., with all their spying and analysis power cannot do what Belling Cat do based purely on social media, which is produce anti-Russia 'information'? NATO has satellites with cameras that from space can take photographs of a parasite on an ant, spies on everything we do. Yet based on a photo of a crater, which can be accessed by NATO intelligence (assuming NATO has access to the internet), only Belling Cat can state that it was caused by Russia. Not one military intelligence unit in the NATO sphere can say this. Only Belling Cat can. And this claim is then repeated by politicians and the NATO media.

NATO, and in particular British Military Intelligence, must be so incompetent and/or so embarrassed!!

I also find it curious that Belling Cat spend so much time tracing the alleged movements of Russian military personnel and hardware in Ukraine when for 4 years Syria has been invaded by international cutthroat cannibal Jihadis who have now morphed into Islamic State and been financed by Saudi Arabia and Qatar, armed and trained by the USA, supported by the UK and France and Turkey (where Higgins' wife comes from), trained in Jordan, and medically and militarily assisted by Israel, and Belling Cat have not produced one report, not even a tiny one, against this illegal invasion and use of a bloodthirsty proxy force as per a plan that was implemented after 9/11 (as revealed by General Wesley Clark) and amended in 2007 (as revealed by Seymour Hersh). That illegal invasion/war has led to an estimated over 200,000 deaths and millions of refugees. But what does Higgins focus on? The use of barrel bombs in Aleppo, i.e. one tiny part of a global war, and Ghouta, which I sort of predicted and blamed on Prince Bandar of Saudi Arabia.

And regarding Ukraine:
1. NATO destabilised Ukraine after Yanukovich decided to sign a huge deal with Russia instead of with the IMF;
2. NATO ran the Nazis who ousted Yanukovich in a violent coup, and those Nazis burned many alive in Odessa;
3. NATO wants Ukraine as a member and vice versa with the current junta;
4. NATO wants first strike missiles in Ukraine aimed at Moscow;
5. NATO is not happy with Putin for foiling their plans to bomb the shit out of Syria after Bandar's false flag at Ghouta failed to provoke the demand for war it was supposed and assumed would do.

A week or two ago Higgins was embroiled in a twitter argument with the holder of the twitter account Non_Disclosure regarding funding. Higgins was dodging the question by replying that Non_Disclosure should suggest a source of finance and Higgins would confirm or deny if he or Belling Cat had received finance from that source.

It would be useful for Higgins and the whole Belling Cat team to be open and transparent about their finances instead of trying to hide them and mock questions about them. I was open and transparent last week when I declared that in the last 16 years all my finances have only come from teaching and researching mathematics, and before that from warehouse work.

Open and transparent, like the investigation in to MH17 should be by looking into activities of Ukraine's air force and BUKs on 17th July 2014.

Thursday, February 19, 2015


We bombed Iraq, then gave them Islamic State.
We bombed Libya, then gave them Islamic State too.
We wanted to bomb Syria, but gave them Islamic State instead.


Lebanon - Islamic State?





The whole world?


Uranus? (giggle, giggle)


British media are ablaze with a story that the RAF was scrambled to intercept Russian bombers off the coast of Cornwall.

But guess what: the bombers were always in international air space!!!

A similar scare story happened a few weeks ago just as the Litvinenko Inquiry began. The Russian Ambassador to Great Britain was summoned to the FCO to explain himself and Russia's obviously deliberate provocations for war. However, the Russian Ambassador pointed out that the plans for those flights had been filed in full accordance with international regulations so Great Britain had no reason to be concerned, i.e. there was no scare. A similar outcome will occur following this non-event.

But we can fully sympathise with the British government's position that Russia is the aggressor and is seeking war by flying planes in international air space in full accordance with international regulations. I mean, just look how close Russia has placed its country to NATO's bases!!!

And quite soon you might be able to plonk a NATO logo on Ukraine following the violent NATO-sponsored neo-Nazi coup which has led to Ukraine taking one step closer to joining NATO, a recipient of NATO funds becoming Prime Minister, and the new Ukraine finance minister coming straight from the American Embassy in Kiev and signing Ukraine over to the IMF and Monsanto.

No wonder Callous Cameron wants to use armed Police to seal off woods so he can shoot pigeons without being seen. Those pigeons are revealing the plan!!

Innocent harmless pigeon in tree : "Coup! Coup! Coup! Coup!"

Paranoid Callous Cameron: "I'll teach you a lesson for blabbing our plot in Kiev!!" BANG! BANG!

Innocent harmless pigeon in tree is now an ex-innocent harmless pigeon on the ground with its brains blown out.


Once a liar always a liar.
But this liar also sets Gaza on fire.


According to NATO, Vladimir Putin is a paedophile, autistic, a tyrant, a wife-beater, a drunken letch and had plastic surgery.

Is there anything right with Vladimir Putin?

Meanwhile, in the real world, there is a real-life Whitehall VIP paedophile and murder scandal cover-up that runs straight through Downing Street and into Buckingham Palace.

Putin is no saint, but with devils behind NATO controlling The White House and Downing Street even Jesus Christ himself would do more than overturn the tables of the moneychangers to save the world from a total catastrophic war.

It is bleedin' obvious that the devils behind NATO destabilised Ukraine through a violent neo-Nazi coup because Yanukovich had decided to sign a huge deal with Russia rather than the EU and IMF. NATO's man Yats rose from being a geeky-looking weakling scared of his own shadow to somehow become the new PM with the full backing of Victoria Kagan-Nuland, so that now Ukraine's finance minister is an American straight form the US Embassy in Kiev, and Ukraine is signing huge deals with the EU and IMF and has taken one step closer to joining NATO.

This probably wouldn't concern Putin if this was happening in Ireland or Mexico but Ukraine has a border with Russia. If Ukraine joins NATO then NATO could plonk first strike missiles in Ukraine aimed at Moscow.

Now imagine that a violent neo-Nazi coup occured in say France and Russia was believed to be behind it after a geeky-looking weakling scared of his own shadow with money from the FSB sponsoring his foundation suddenly became PM. What would we do?

The situation in Ukraine is similar to the Cuban Missile Crisis 1962. In that crisis the USSR was suspected of plonking first strike missiles in Cuba, but this was after the CIA's failed invasion at The Bay of Pigs provoked the USSR into defending their ally Fidel Castro. In the case of Ukraine, Yanukovich decided to ally with Russia so NATO unleashed the Nazis to burn people alive in Odessa (like Islamic State) and then sign with the EU/IMF/NATO.

It's that obvious that NATO is the imperialist that even pigeons dumping on the church roof know what happened: coup! coup! coup!

And all this anti-Putin propaganda is just that: propaganda. Putin is the figurehead of an apparent global resistance to the hegemony of the kiddie-fiddlers in Whitehall and Buckingham Palace due to organisations such as BRICS and their alternative to the IMF.

As reports suggest today, there have been several assassination attempts on Putin but all have failed. Those reports are restating that as a warning to him. This is why Bandar threatened Putin in 2013 that if Putin didn't dump Assad then Bandar would unleash hell in Syria and Lebanon, so Bandar gave us Ghouta. This is why the oil price has been reduced by head-chopping Saudi Arabia. And this is why Theresa May has decided after all these years that there should be an inquiry into the death of MI6 agent Litvinenko but only with establishment QCs like Robin Tam and Ben Emmerson running the farce and lots of evidence involving MI6 either kept secret or heard in secret.

I mean, do you honestly believe that May would appoint an independent QC with a heart of gold to be counsel to an inquiry involving child abuse and murder when that inquiry could bring down the establishment?


This image was released by the USA shortly after 17th July 2014 and alleges to show the paths of MH17 and a BUK fired from Shnizhne intercepting based on data from 'sensors' belonging to the USA.


They won't release this data but instead released this image which they say is based on that data.

Well, I'm convinced. Aren't you?

They said Iraq had WMDs so we went in and killed approaching one million Iraqis to find no WMDs but eventually create Islamic State!!

And if you zoom in you can actually see the missile with small flags of Russia and the Donetsk People's Republic stuck on the front.

But curiously, despite many eyewitnesses stating on camera that they saw Ukrainian fighter jets close to MH17 when it was shot down (a fact overlooked/ignored by NATO and their gimps), those fighter jets are not, repeat not, visible in this image.



While Cameron says that Russia must stop interfering in Ukraine and Fallon says that Russia could destabilise the Baltic states, the British government has been supporting NATO's Kiev Nazis in a violent coup in Ukraine and since 2009 planning the smuggling of and then supporting international cutthroat cannibal Jihadis in Syria, as well as invading Iraq on lies and supporting AQIM in Libya, and as a result we now have Islamic State sawing the heads off infidels in those states!!

This is breathtaking hypocrisy from the British government.

Sadly this breathtaking hypocrisy would manifest whoever was in Number 10: Labour, Conervative or Liberal Democrat.

Because the real power does not reside there and Number 10 is just a conduit for that power.

However, it could be different if the Greens or Respect were elected.

Wednesday, February 18, 2015


I think there is something to this documentary and its thesis cannot dismissed.

Basically the documentary:
1. claims that 4 Ukraine military SU25s were in the air from 1pm local time on 17th July, with numbers 06, 07, 08 and 38, and that German intelligence knows this;
2. these planes were flown by pilots from the elite 299 Squadron under orders/sponsorship from Kiev oligarch Kolomoisky with the aim of killing President Putin whose official plane was reported to be in the area and its way to Rostov and had a livery very similar to that of MH17;
3. the pilot who shot down MH17 is named along with the dispatcher, who was an overt supporter of the Kiev Nazis;
4. Kolomoisky is connected through Nevzlin to Khordokovsky [TTS : and through Khordokovsky to Lord Jacob Rothschild];
5. shows yet more eyewitnesses shown on camera stating without question that fighter jets were close to MH17 when it all happened;
6. the Ukraine military is being very coy about its flights on 17th July;
7. Ukraine air defences were also in the area of Donetsk on 17th July and the activity of their radar stations was surprisingly at maximum on 17th July [TTS : which is strange when you recall that the 'rebels' had no fighter jets] but then quickly reduced;
8. Putin is a target to the global elite because he is the figurehead of a global resistance to their hegemonyg, e.g. BRICS (as I have been suggesting);
9. asks why the corpses of the pilots have not been released, and why the official investigation into MH17 is taking over a year to publish its report.

And apparently Poroshenko knows all this!!

So what was said in Minsk last week?

Is this why Poroshenko abandoned Debaltsevo?

Is this why Merkel wanted to sort it all out?

Now, I find it curious that it is alleged that German intelligence knows that 4 SU25s were in the air on 17th July, yet it is Der Spiegel who claimed that MH17 was shot down by rebels but with a BUK from the Ukraine military, and then later with Correctiv publishes a flashy report citing eyewitnesses who say that the rebels shot down MH17 from a field 3 Km north of Shnizhne, but this second report was compiled with Belling Cat who just a few weeks ago firmly backed the thesis that MH17 was shot down from a field 5 Km south of Shnizhne!! And to add to this farce, the Ukraine Security Service released tapes which they said proved 100% beyond doubt that MH17 was shot down by Cossacks from Chernukino, a claim later contradicted by the USA who released a devastatingly persuasive image of an arc originating from Shnizhne intercepting a straight line representing MH17!!





We do have to ask what the Ukraine military, and specifically the 299 Squadron, was doing on 17th July 2014 and why they are so coy in telling the world what they were doing on 17th July 2014?

'How MH17 was shot down in Ukraine - Film by Andrey Karaulov (Eng subs)

Tuesday, February 17, 2015


Flicking through TV channels last night I came across Geordie Shore.

My faith in the human race has now been fully restored, and I now once again truly believe that what I am doing is worth it if it means we can have more TV like, and more celebrities such as those who appear in, Geordie Shore.

Monday, February 16, 2015


MI5 are accused of covering up the sickening activities at Kincora Children's home.

MI5 employed Robin Tam QC against one of the finest journalists in the world, Tony Gosling.

Robin Tam QC was counsel for the FCO and MI6 in the inquest into the death of Diana.

Robin Tam QC is Counsel to the Litvinenko Inquiry.

The other counsel to that Inquiry is Ben Emmerson QC.

Ben Emmerson QC is also counsel to the Historic Child Abuse Inquiry and is not exactly shining in that role, with his behaviour being questioned by abuse survivors after Theresa May decided to scrap the whole inquiry (except Emmerson) and start again, appointing a New Zealand judge of questionable repute, at the request of Emmerson, to head that inquiry.

Sleep tight.


It's so fucking obvious what is happening in Ukraine that even the pigeons dumping on the town hall roof know: Coup! Coup! Coup!


Call me a silly billy, but haven't we been here before?

Saturday, February 14, 2015


The key moment in the violent coup by NATO-sponsored neo-Nazis in Kiev was the massacre of protestors and police that was blamed on the police.

But guess what!! IT WAS BOLLOCKS.

What happened was in fact a classic NATO Gladio operation akin to that which happened in Venezuela in 2002 in a failed attempted coup to replace Hugo Chavez with a much more Washington-friendly President.

One of the snipers has told the BBC that he and another man were doing the shooting from the Conservatory. He did not identify the man who gave them the guns and ammo, but he is admitting that it was him and this other guy.

"I was shooting downwards at their feet," says a man we will call Sergei, who tells me he took up position in the Kiev Conservatory, a music academy on the south-west corner of the square.

"Of course, I could have hit them in the arm or anywhere. But I didn't shoot to kill."

Sergei says he had been a regular protester on the Maidan for more than a month, and that his shots at police on the square and on the roof of an underground shopping mall, caused them to retreat.

There had been shooting two days earlier, on 18 February. The 19th, a Wednesday, had been quieter, but in the evening, Sergei says, he was put in contact with a man who offered him two guns: one a 12-gauge shotgun, the other a hunting rifle, a Saiga that fired high-velocity rounds.

He chose the latter, he says, and stashed it in the Post Office building, a few yards from the Conservatory. Both buildings were under the control of the protesters.

When the shooting started early on the morning of the 20th, Sergei says, he was escorted to the Conservatory, and spent some 20 minutes before 07:00 firing on police, alongside a second gunman.

[source : The untold story of the Maidan massacre, BBC, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-31359021, 12th February 2015]

This agrees with the statements of RT reporters, other eyewitnesses, photographs, and international leaders such as Estonia’s foreign minister Urmas Paet who told our very own Catherine Ashton which side had done the shooting.

So next time you see a pigeon, just remember that they know more than you regarding events in Ukraine.

Because there has been a coup.

A violent NATO-sponsored neo-Nazi coup, because Yanukovich had changed his mind and rejected a deal with the EU/IMF in favour of Russia. And Russia had blocked the planned war on Syria after the false flag of Ghouta was supposed to provoke calls for revenge. The result of the coup is that:
1. NATO and Ukraine are about to be betrothed;
2. The IMF is 'loaning' Ukraine tens of billions of dollars and Ukraine is selling its soul to Monsanto (I wonder how much will be spent on weapons from the USA).

It's a text book coup, silly billies!!

And all you are being told to care about is the soft porn in Fifty Shades of Grey.

Friday, February 13, 2015


This report says it all: al Qaeda in Southern Syria has asked Israel to attack positions held by the Syrian Arab Army and their allies Hezbollah.

If Israel agrees then this wouldn't be the first time. Israel has attacked SAA positions and bases several times, sometimes even coordinated with the rebels.

And it won't be the last.

Because this romantic relationship between Israel and al Qaeda goes all the way back to 9/11. And in 2007 the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia agreed to unleash al Qaeda onto Syria, Lebanon and Iran.

Israel’s constant attacks on Syrian military targets and Hezbollah forces in southern Syria have killed a number of top anti-ISIS fighters. Now, with Syria and Hezbollah moving against al-Qaeda-held territory in the far south, the rebels are hoping they’ll do it again.

Reports from Israeli Druse leaders who claim they are in close contact with rebels say they’re urging the Israeli military to intervene to “save” the rebel-held territories from the southern offensive.

That territory is almost entirely held by al-Qaeda’s Jabhat al-Nusra, in effect meaning Israel is being asked to save al-Qaeda from the Assad government’s forces.

Israeli officials have insisted in the past they prefer anyone over Assad to be in power in Syria, but this may put that to the test, as al-Qaeda is the anyone in question along the frontier.

It also risks further undercutting the US war in Syria, as even though the Obama Administration won’t coordinate with Assad, they’re openly attacking al-Qaeda targets in the country, and probably won’t look favorably on Israel intervening militarily on al-Qaeda’s behalf.

[source : Southern Syria Rebels Ask Israel to Attack Army, Hezbollah Positions, Anti War, http://news.antiwar.com/2015/02/12/southern-syria-rebels-ask-israel-to-attack-army-hezbollah-positions/, 12th February 2015]


Can you fix those self-service machines so they don't always tell me, "Unexpected item in baggage area"?


In 1969 high level Rockefeller employee Dr Richard Day told a private audience the plan for the next few decades. One aspect of the plan was that regarding sex it would be 'anything goes'. Homosexuality would be encouraged and promoted. Abortion would also be encouraged and promoted. This was for several reasons: population control; perversion; one step closer to pure satanism.

It cannot be denied that this part of the agenda has been implemented. Last night on Channel 4 was the latest episode of their new 'flagship' series called Cucumber. Hmm. A gardening programme hosted by Alan Titchmarsh? Don't be such a silly billy! It's about the wildly gay crowd in Manchester! In fact this promotion of homosexuality forms a core component of the war on Russia!!

You can also not have failed to have noticed that today is the general release of Fifty Shades of Grey (hence the title, a play on great). For the last few months we have been bombarded with news about this film as the media and marketing whip us into a vibrating frenzy, quivering with excitement, driving us into an orgasm of demand for furry handcuffs. BBC Radio 5 Live had frequent reports from the London premiere last night.

Now contrast that media coverage with that for the film Selma based on the famous march for civil rights.

Don't tell me that there isn't an agenda to promote anything goes and homosexuality when the World Press Photo of the Year 2014 is of two male homosexuals in Russia while the videos of General Wesley Clark revealing the plan for several wars and regime change after 9/11 remain unseen gathering dust in the vaults.

Thursday, February 12, 2015


These Tory fuckers live on a different planet!!

I have never dodged any tax. NEVER! In fact I've over paid when I've started new jobs.



[To the tune of Addicted To Love by Robert Palmer]

You bombed the gooks in Vietnam
A proxy war in Afghanistan
Invade Latin America
death squads to kill Sandanista
You can't sleep, you can't eat
There's no doubt, you're in deep
Your throat is tight, you can't breathe
Another kill is all you need
Ohh oohh

You like to think that you're immune to the stuff...oh yeah
It's closer to the truth to say you always want more
You know you're gonna have to face it
You're addicted to war

You bombed Iraq in '91
Then Bosnia, then Afghanistan
Iraq again, then Libya
You want the same for Syria, but gave them terror
A fake Jihad
Another plan that's gone bad
And then Iran for Israel
to create a Zionist hell
Ohh oohh

You like to think that you're immune to the stuff...oh yeah
It's closer to the truth to say you always want more
You know you're gonna have to face it
You're addicted to war

Might as well face it, you're addicted to war
Might as well face it, you're addicted to war
Might as well face it, you're addicted to war
Might as well face it, you're addicted to war

Might as well face it, you're addicted to war



Are you 100% sure that it really is The Voice of Israel and not that of an impostor?

Someone like Mossad?

Wednesday, February 11, 2015


I can swear with my hand on my heart that nobody has given me any money in return for any services or writing published on this blog.

I do not advertise for finance, like some.

I do not display a Donate button or something similar, asking for donations.

I do not advertise and/or sell products for revenue, or am employed by anyone who does.

In the last 16 years my income has only come from learning to teach maths and teaching maths, and from mathematics-related research.

Everything on this blog is me and nothing but me: from historical research to opinion to music.


I wish could say the same for everyone else...

Perhaps if there were no donations of any kind then the truth would prevail...


He's there again!!

At our expense!!

But what is he plotting in person that he dare not discuss over the phone?

Remember that Saudi Arabia has a new King who must have his orders!!!


I know that the title of this blog sounds sinister.

But according to the Litvinenko Inquiry, with MI5 gimp Tam and dodgy Emmerson as QCs, the suspects Kovtun and Lugovoi dressed like clowns before their alleged first attempt at murdering Litvinenko.

Giving evidence, the hotel’s manager, Goran Krgo, said he spotted Lugovoi and Kovtun the moment they arrived. “I remember these guests quite vividly,” he told the inquiry on Wednesday. Asked to elaborate, he said: “We found them to be quite comical on account of how they were dressed and the excessive jewellery they were wearing.”

[source : Litvinenko killers left radiation trail across London, inquiry told, The Guardian, http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/feb/11/litvinenko-killers-radiation-trail-london-inquiry, 11th February 2015]

So we have the suspects:
1. dressing like clowns to attract attention to themselves;
2. telling their son to shake hands with the person they have just murdered, with Polonium 210 all over the place.

Make sense?

But how about this:
Giving evidence, Det Con Spencer Scott said he stopped both men at immigration control. He said: “I thought they were of interest.”

He questioned them for 20 minutes. “They were very evasive as to why they were going to the UK,” he said, adding they “gave one-word answers”.

Scott said he let them enter the country after confirming that their business meeting was genuine. “I was given advice I should allow them to go through,” he said.

On whose advice? And for what reason? And was their luggage checked for suspicious substances?