Friday, May 22, 2015

BUSTED! ISLAMIC STATE WAS MADE IN THE USA

On Monday, May 18, the conservative government watchdog group Judicial Watch published a selection of formerly classified documents obtained from the U.S. Department of Defense and State Department through a federal lawsuit.

While initial mainstream media reporting is focused on the White House’s handling of the Benghazi consulate attack, a much “bigger picture” admission and confirmation is contained in one of the Defense Intelligence Agency documents circulated in 2012: that an ‘Islamic State’ is desired in Eastern Syria to effect the West’s policies in the region.

Astoundingly, the newly declassified report states that for “THE WEST, GULF COUNTRIES, AND TURKEY [WHO] SUPPORT THE [SYRIAN] OPPOSITION… THERE IS THE POSSIBILITY OF ESTABLISHING A DECLARED OR UNDECLARED SALAFIST PRINCIPALITY IN EASTERN SYRIA (HASAKA AND DER ZOR), AND THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT THE SUPPORTING POWERS TO THE OPPOSITION WANT, IN ORDER TO ISOLATE THE SYRIAN REGIME…”.

[source : 2012 Defense Intelligence Agency document: West will facilitate rise of Islamic State “in order to isolate the Syrian regime”, Levant Report, http://levantreport.com/2015/05/19/2012-defense-intelligence-agency-document-west-will-facilitate-rise-of-islamic-state-in-order-to-isolate-the-syrian-regime/, 18th May 2015]

If you read the above report in full then you will understand why:
1. when the Kurds told NATO intelligence in early 2014 what was happening and was going to happen in Syria regarding Syrian rebels and Islamic State, they were ignored;
2. the Iraqi Army was told to stand down and allow the Syrian rebels to overrun their barracks and take control of their military hardware and resulting raids on banks to provide finance;
3. despite the overwhelming fire power of the US Air Force and backed by the UK, Islamic State is alive and well and sawing the heads off anyone who opposes them, now reportedly controlling more than half of Syria.

This is a result of The Redirection reported by Seymour Hersh in 2007 in which Hersh stated that the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia were going to unleash the nastiest international cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria, Lebanon and Iran.

And The Redirection is due to the failure of the plan revealed to General Wesley Clark in October 2001 for war and regime change in seven countries in five years, which by 2007 was moribund, with only Iraq seeing regime change and Lebanon actually beating Israel in 2006.

The BIG BIG question now is: WHAT DO WILLIAM HAGUE AND PHIL HAMMOND KNOW ABOUT THIS?!?!?!?!

Everyone MUST back President Assad against Islamic State. No ifs. No buts.

We have unleashed the nastiest international cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria.

Hague, Hammond and Cameron must resign immediately.

Thursday, May 21, 2015

GOOD OLD FASHIONED COMMON SENSE

1. tax the hell out of the Venetian City of London;
2. use The Bank of England to create hundreds of billions for infrastructure development and rapid education, not to bail out failing fascist banks (who should be left to fail).

CHECK OUT THESE COVERS

Huw is a bit shy at first but after a minute or so is losing it to the groove.

The Whispers - 'And The Beat Goes On' bass playalong by Huw Foster


And Sina just completely destroys those ooh-look-at-me-aren't-I-gorgeous van Halen girls prancing around in their official video...

Jump (Van Halen), drum cover by a 14 year old girl


But I wonder what they and their artistic ilk know and care to know about about the artistry in the true origin of the horrors of WW1 and WW2?


SPOT THE DIFFERENCE

Who's been eating too much raw fish for NATO's precious Ukraine?

"They stole it from us. THEY STOLE IT FROM US!!"

THOUGHT FOR T'DAY ON THE ONE RING

How many teachers would wear the one ring and then throw themselves into the river of fire inside mount doom to destroy all evil?

And how many would be seduced by its power, if they could have been arsed to make that trek in the first place?



YET MORE COMMON SENSE FROM STUART HOOPER

In response to the statement by Prince Harry (Who's yo' daddy?) that the British army did him good, kept him out of trouble and that conscription should be reintroduced, Stuart J Hooper, candidate in the South Basildon and East Thurrock constituency has made another common sense statement:



To pay for these jobs we should:
1. tax the hell out of the Venetian City of London;
2. use The Bank of England to create hundreds of billions for infrastructure development and rapid education, not to bail out failing fascist banks (who should be left to fail).

It's just plain common sense.

And we are starting to see some of it approach The Marsten House: first the Greens proposed a financial trading tax; then Richard Burgon MP protested against the hereditary system of government; and Stuart talking economic and political commons sense.

NICE ONE, RICHARD!

Richard Burgon MP has protested, albeit quietly, against Liz by stating before taking his oath of allegiance to Liz,
"as someone that believes that the head of state should be elected, I make this oath in order to serve my constituents."

[There should be an embedded video here but it didn't show in the preview]


And quite right too!

Nice one, Richard!

Wednesday, May 20, 2015

BILDERBERGER BILDT TELLS HALF-TRUTHS IN SOROS FINANCED MEDIA PROJECT

Project Syndicate is financed by George Soros. He even writes on the website, lots and lots of pro-EU stuff.

Another writer is Carl Bildt, Bilderberger and professional Russia-hater.

Bildt has written an article on Project Syndicate. The US Ambassador to Ukraine Geoffrey Pyatt has tweeted it.

Bildt has this to say:
Of course, when Yanukovych returned home, he had to face thousands of protesters in Kyiv’s Maidan (Independence Square). Determined to hold him to his promise to sign the EU agreement and not take Ukraine into a customs union with Russia, the protesters mobilized the country. Yanukovych, failing to crush them with his security forces, simply fled. Russia’s behavior in Ukraine since then has made the Eastern Partnership more important than ever.

[source : Carl "Bilderberg" Bildt, Staying the Course in Europe’s East, Project Syndicate, http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/eu-riga-summit-eastern-partnership-by-carl-bildt-2015-05, 20th May 2015]

But Carl, this is not the full truth, is it?

Come on, Carl. There is a bit more to it than that.

When you say, "the protesters mobilized the country", do you actually mean that neo-Nazis began to throw Molotov cocktails, burn down buildings and shoot protestors and police to provoke mass outrage?

And when you say, "Yanukovych, failing to crush them with his security forces, simply fled", do you actually mean that the people of Ukraine were so outraged by the aforementioned false flag of neo-Nazis shooting protestors and police that they went into a frenzy, and rather than shoot the violent protestors the police stood down and allowed the neo-Nazis to burn down government buildings and force Yanukovich to flee for his life?

And when you say, "Russia’s behavior in Ukraine since then has made the Eastern Partnership more important than ever.", do you actually mean that the Kiev Nazis have been bombing from the air and shelling civilians opposing their Nazism, resulting in the deaths of over 7000 civilians of East Ukraine so Russia has been trying to avert a massacre by the Kiev Nazis?

What would the people of England do if neo-Nazis ran a violent coup in Wales and began shelling the homes of those who opposed that Nazism?

Tuesday, May 19, 2015

RUSSIA CLOSES CORRIDOR TO AFGHANISTAN

I was just talking about this yesterday...


A VERY MYSTERIOUS ROUTE

In response to Robert Parry's allegation that the 'documentary' presented by pro-British Army reporter Michael Usher contained fakery, Belling Cat have directed Parry to the an article they produced on 22nd July 2014 which they claim establishes that the BUK with a missing missile was in Luhansk on the morning of 18th July 2014.

OK. If it was in Luhansk then where, in what direction was it travelling, and how did it get there?

The particular suburb of Luhansk the video was filmed was about 2.5Km south west of Luhansk city centre. Belling Cat published this image showing where the video was filmed (see little yellow camera).


So let's zoom out a bit so we can get this location in to some perspective.


The junction is that heart shape in the middle of the above image.

But let's zoom out a bit more.


The junction is now in the bottom left hand corner, and the city centre of Luhansk is in the top right hand corner.

Two things to note:
1. the 'official' Ukraine narrative is that the BUK was on its way to the border with Russia when it was filmed. But the main hypothesis is that the BUK that shot down MH17 was located 5Km south of Shnizhne, which is south of Luhansk. So how did it get from south of Shnizhne to south west Luhansk;
2. the BUK is travelling south east on that road, not north east.

So we can ask the following questions: why is the BUK that allegedly shot down MH17 from 5Km south of Shnizhne travelling south east in a western suburb of Luhansk, which is north of Shnizhne, at about 5am on the morning of 18th July if, according to the official Ukraine government narrative, it is either on its way to the border with Russia north east of Luhansk, or according to Naida was in Russia itself by 4am?

This evidence actually supports the hypothesis proposed by the SBU that that BUK came from Chernukino.

But where it was going is a mystery.

I'm not being funny or awkward, but if there is going to be some kind of war between NATO and Russia over Ukraine then we had all better know that we are going to war for a proper reason and not some trumped up hypothesis with more holes than a collander.

And explaining why a BUK that had allegedly just shot down MH17 would be in a south-western suburb of Luhansk travelling south east if it was, according to the SBU, supposed to be either travelling to the border with Russia north east of Luhansk, or according to Naida in Russia itself by the time the video was filmed, would be a good start!

The fact is that this video came from the SBU.

Why Belling Cat should believe the SBU is beyond me because they believe that MH17 was shot down from 5Km south of Shnizhne yet the SBU cobbled together a tape of alleged intercepted phone calls and said it proved 100% beyond doubt that Cossacks based at Chernukino shot down MH17. The location and direction of travel of the BUK with missing missile actually supports the SBU's claim. Chernukino is 60Km south west of Luhansk, and is located at the pinhead in this image.


It is possible that the BUK travelled from Shnizhne to Debaltsevo and then to Luhansk.

But we still have no idea for certain when that video was filmed. For all we know it could have been filmed before 18th July and be the BUK that shot down the Antonov An26 on 14th July?

Monday, May 18, 2015

LOVE'S COMIN' AT YA

This one's for that ogre, that gollum, Victoria Kagan-Nuland, the witch who ran NATO's neo-Nazi coup in Ukraine which has led to the deaths of over 7000 civilians in East Ukraine.

Still, I suppose it's better than the half million or so deaths of Iraqis her husband caused through PNAC...

Melba Moore - Love's Comin' At Ya ! 1982


THE NATO SUMMIT IN BUCHAREST APRIL 2008

At the NATO summit in Bucharest in April 2008 it was agreed that Georgia and Ukraine would at some point join NATO. Here is the statement from the formal declaration:
23. NATO welcomes Ukraine’s and Georgia’s Euro-Atlantic aspirations for membership in NATO. We agreed today that these countries will become members of NATO. Both nations have made valuable contributions to Alliance operations. We welcome the democratic reforms in Ukraine and Georgia and look forward to free and fair parliamentary elections in Georgia in May. MAP is the next step for Ukraine and Georgia on their direct way to membership. Today we make clear that we support these countries’ applications for MAP. Therefore we will now begin a period of intensive engagement with both at a high political level to address the questions still outstanding pertaining to their MAP applications. We have asked Foreign Ministers to make a first assessment of progress at their December 2008 meeting. Foreign Ministers have the authority to decide on the MAP applications of Ukraine and Georgia.

[source : Bucharest Summit Declaration, NATO, http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/official_texts_8443.htm, 3rd April 2008]

But another attendee was Vladimir Putin. He spoke at the summit and had this to say about Georgia and Ukraine:
As for the policy of expanding the alliance, we have been attentively watching your discussion yesterday. On the whole, of course, we are satisfied with your decisions, which took place. But If I speak about Georgia and Ukraine, it is clear that the matter concerns not only security issues. For our Georgian friends, of course, it is one of means to restore their territorial integrity, as they believe. Besides, by means of force, under the aegis of NATO. It is an old, many-years, lasting for more than a hundred years, ethnic conflict between Georgians, between Abkhazians (it is a small ethnic group, it numbers a mere 200 thousand people), between Ossetians, for a hundred years, and more, these conflicts are ethnic. To solve these problems they need not to enter NATO, they should have patience, establish dialog with small ethnic groups. And we have been trying to help them, besides, to help Georgia restore its territorial integrity. And even despite the decisions on Kosovo, we will not recognize the independence of these quasipublic formations, though they have been calling on us since long ago, for decades already. We have been very responsible, very weighted, and call on you to be careful as well.

But in Ukraine, one third are ethnic Russians. Out of forty five million people, in line with the official census, seventeen millions are Russians. There are regions, where only the Russian population lives, for instance, in the Crimea. 90% are Russians. Generally speaking, Ukraine is a very complicated state. Ukraine, in the form it currently exists, was created in the Soviet times, it received its territories from Poland – after the Second World war, from Czechoslovakia, from Romania – and at present not all the problems have been solved as yet in the border region with Romania in the Black Sea. Then, it received huge territories from Russia in the east and south of the country. It is a complicated state formation. If we introduce into it NATO problems, other problems, it may put the state on the verge of its existence. Complicated internal political problems are taking place there. We should act also very-very carefully. We do not have any right to veto, and, probably, we do not pretend to have. But I want that all of us, when deciding such issues, realize that we have there our interests as well. Well, seventeen million Russians currently live in Ukraine. Who may state that we do not have any interests there? South, the south of Ukraine, completely, there are only Russians.

The Crimea was merely received by Ukraine with the decision of the KPSS Political Bureau. There were not even any state procedures on transferring this territory. We have been calm and responsible about these problems. We are not trying to provoke anything, we have been acting very carefully, but we ask our partners to act reasonably as well. Besides, there was a call to act more actively on some directions of collaboration, let’s say, on Afghanistan. You know, I have just reminded Mr. Secretary General, when we talked with him tete-a-tete, that if our American friends managed to act rather effectively in Afghanistan and President Bush was very decisive and, on the whole, effective, I think the Afghan direction, without any doubt, is a success of the foreign policy of USA, in my opinion. But it happened also because we, Russia, have been supporting one-sidedly the so-called Northern Alliance for many years. We supplied them with a hundred millions of dollars of arms. It was the only real political and military force in Afghanistan, which, even pressed by the Taliban to the Tajik border, operated and formed the basis, which began battle actions against the Taliban at the territory.

It created a springboard for the international forces to enter this territory. We have been maintaining relations with Afghanistan, helping them restore their armed forces, supplying them with arms, spare parts, rendering humanitarian aid, training, and for a long time we have even provided the thing, which you could hardly imagine before – a transit not only by air, by also by land, for France, for the Federative Republic of Germany, and today Mr.Scheffer and our Foreign Minister signed a document on transit for the whole Organization of the North-Atlantic Treaty, about the transit of military cargo through our territory. Besides, if the discussion on your expansion issues developed differently yesterday, today’s transit agreement would not likely be signed.

But, considering that, nevertheless, as we understand, our concerns were heard somehow at last, we made decision for ourselves to not stop the collaboration on Afghanistan, but, to put it honestly, there was such a desire...

[source : Text of Putin’s speech at NATO Summit, UNIAN, http://www.unian.info/world/111033-text-of-putins-speech-at-nato-summit-bucharest-april-2-2008.html, 18th April 2008]

Let's look at this:
We are not trying to provoke anything, we have been acting very carefully, but we ask our partners to act reasonably as well. Besides, there was a call to act more actively on some directions of collaboration, let’s say, on Afghanistan.

...We have been maintaining relations with Afghanistan, helping them restore their armed forces, supplying them with arms, spare parts, rendering humanitarian aid, training, and for a long time we have even provided the thing, which you could hardly imagine before – a transit not only by air, by also by land, for France, for the Federative Republic of Germany, and today Mr.Scheffer and our Foreign Minister signed a document on transit for the whole Organization of the North-Atlantic Treaty, about the transit of military cargo through our territory.

Russia agreed that NATO could use Russian airspace for transit to and from Afghanistan.

So what did Russia get in return?

A few months later, in the early hours of 8th August 2008, that mad bastard Mikhail Saakashvili decided to bomb the citizens of South Ossetia as they slept in their beds. This was a deliberate provocation of Russia by Georgia, perhaps to see what Putin would do, or even to trigger Georgia joining NATO. So how did Saakashvili come to power? The usual suspects: NED; Freedom House; Rothschild agent, George Soros.
Mihkail Saakashvili was deliberately placed in power in one of the most sophisticated US regime change operations, using ostensibly private NGOs (Non Governmental Organizations) to create an atmosphere of popular protest against the existing regime of former Soviet Foreign Minister Edouard Shevardnadze, who was no longer useful to Washington when he began to make a deal with Moscow over energy pipelines and privatizations.

Saakashvili was brought to power in a US-engineered coup run on the ground by US-funded NGO’s, in an application of a new method of US destabilization of regimes it considered hostile to its foreign policy agenda. The November 24 2003 Wall Street Journal explicitly credited the toppling of Shevardnadze's regime to the operations of "a raft of non-governmental organizations . . . supported by American and other Western foundations." These NGOs, said the Journal, had "spawned a class of young, English-speaking intellectuals hungry for pro-Western reforms" who were instrumental laying the groundwork for a bloodless coup.

Coup by NGO

But there is more. The NGOs were coordinated by the US Ambassador to Georgia, Richard Miles, who had just arrived in Tbilisi fresh from success in orchestrating the CIA-backed toppling of Slobodan Milosevic in Belgrade, using the same NGOs. Miles, who is believed to be an undercover intelligence specialist, supervised the Saakashvili coup.

It involved US billionaire George Soros’ Open Society Georgia Foundation. It involved the Washington-based Freedom House whose chairman was former CIA chief James Woolsey. It involved generous financing from the US Congress-financed National Endowment for Democracy, an agency created by Ronald Reagan in the 1980’s to “do privately what the CIA used to do,” namely coups against regimes the US Government finds unfriendly.

[source : The Puppet Masters Behind Georgia President Saakashvili, F William Engdahl, http://www.engdahl.oilgeopolitics.net/Geopolitics___Eurasia/Saakashvili/saakashvili.html, 12th August 2008]

Hmm. Soros. Now where have I heard that name before?

But what happened to Saakashvili? He is now in his beloved America but advising Ukraine how to become a vassal state of NATO.

And as for Ukraine, it just experienced the most blatant coup in history...if you can be arsed to look. The new PM in the junta receives NATO funds, he was hand-picked by Victoria Kagan-Nuland, and the new Minister of Finance was a former senior officer at the US Embassy in Kiev who managed funds for USAID (CIA) but somehow 'lost' those funds.

So that's how NATO treats Russia. Russia gave NATO open transit across Russia to get into and out of Afghanistan, and warned NATO that Ukraine and Georgia were a red line. So what does NATO do? In 2008 Georgia bombs civilians of South Ossetia in the beds in a blatant provocation of Russia to provoke demands for Georgia to join NATO, and in 2014 NATO supports neo-Nazis as they shoot protestors and police from The Conservatory to provoke a violent coup which has led to the junta blowing over 7000 civilians of East Ukraine to bits for opposing NATO Nazis!!

Just putting MH17 into some context. Without NATO expansion MH17 would not have been shot down by whatever brought it down.

So instead of Putin in the dock it should be Anders Fogh Rasmussen.

But as usual the likes of Higgins provoke demands for the prosecution of the rape victim for scratching the eyes of the rapist and letting the rapist off. In Syria the CIJA is preparing files to prosecute Assad for war crimes while ignoring Saudi Arabia, Israel and the USA (and France and the UK) who unleashed the nastiest international cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria to provoke the violence. And in Ukraine, after Putin held out a hand of friendship to NATO over transit to Afghanistan, NATO repays that friendship by running a violent neo-Nazi coup which has led to 7000 civilians of East Ukraine being blown to bits for opposing their NATO Nazism. Sadly MH17 got caught in the middle.











I'D WANT TO HEAR EVERY SINGLE PUMP

One of the BB housemates is quoted saying, "I'd want to hear every single pump."

What is she talking about?

As I have suggested for many years, Big Brother is meant to acclimatise us all to total surveillance, including being watched in our own homes. This is already being suggested, and is nearly standard in some of the latest TVs now.

What this BB contestant is talking about is a live sex show in the BB house, but just to increase viewing numbers.

When BB started it was the talking point at the office water cooler. There was barely a hint of sex. But now the show inserts porn stars and lotharios hoping that a live sex show will occur, turning us not only into a population prepared for, if not demanding, total surveillance but also into a nation of perverts and voyeurs.

The news will thrill Channel 5 bosses as they plot to save the show from a ratings disaster.

They are desperate to win back fans after viewing figures slumped to below a million following last week’s launch night.

The sex-mad gang have only known each other for five days but already want to make BB16 the raunchiest ever.

They have made a pact that if anyone has a romp in the house they will all stand and watch.

Hunky demolition man Danny Wisker, 29, and law student Sarah Greenwood, 24, are the hot favourites to head between the sheets.

The flirty pair have already got cosy under some cushions.

And Jack "Pie Face" McDermott, 23, revealed if they got it on, then all the housemates would watch.

He said: "If anything is going on, Danny would be in the middle of it. And we will all be just looking."

Saucy Chloe Wilburn, 25, added: "I'd want to hear every single pump."

[source : Big Brother's sex plot to save the show, Daily Star, http://www.dailystar.co.uk/tv/big-brother/442748/big-brother-sex-plot-danny-wiskar-sarah-greenwood-romp-channel-5-reality-tv, 18th May 2015]

Meanwhile NATO supports a violent neo-Nazi coup which has led to the deaths of over 7000 civilians in East Ukraine, and supports Saudi Arabia unleashing the nastiest international cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria who have morphed into Islamic State, who are now being used as the reason to impose draconian surveillance laws. Hence shows like Big Brother have acclimatised us to total surveillance.

GET TO KNOW GOD IN A WHOLE NEW WAY

Get to know God in a whole new way.

Go to Israel.

Has God been putting it on your heart to visit His land?

Do you feel a certain tug on your heart to go to Israel, but you just keep putting it off?

Would Israel be the first destination of your choice – if only you had the time and the money and the right opportunity?

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/04/come-to-israel-Consider this message from me as confirmation of all you are feeling and have been feeling and will continue to feel until you listen to that still small voice and just do it!

It’s time for you to go to Israel and experience the miracle of that land as I have countless times over the last 35 years.

This is the opportunity you have been waiting for – and you can make the time and find the money.

...But the real star of our Israel tours is our Creator. It’s His sacred land we will be visiting. It’s His people we will be getting to know. It’s His ways we will be studying and learning.

Does any of this sound good to you?

Does it sound almost irresistible?

I hope so.

[source : Joesph Farah : Come to Israel with me this fall, World Net Daily, http://www.wnd.com/2015/04/come-to-israel-with-me-this-fall/, 26th April 2015]

Oh yeah? Tell that to the 520 children of Gaza who Israel blew to pieces last year.

Sunday, May 17, 2015

BRIEF SUMMARY OF UKRAINE

Just to make sure we all understand the situation in Ukraine:
1. in 2004 Soros and Berezovsky ran a colour revolution in Ukraine to try to drag Ukraine into NATO;
2. under a pro-NATO government in Ukraine, in April 2008 NATO and Ukraine both agreed that Ukraine would at some point become a member of NATO;
3. but pro-Russia Yanukovich gained power in 2010;
4. and he decided against a huge deal with the EU and IMF in favour of a deal with Russia;
5. so at first peaceful protests began in Maidan, but these turned violent after neo-Nazis began to shoot protestors and police from The Conservatory to provoke outrage;
6. that led to the neo-Nazis chasing Yanukovich out of office, who fled his burning office to Russia;
7. the man who became leader of the new Ukraine junta was a recipient of NATO funds, and was hand-picked by the USA, and many senior members of the junta holding powerful positions were extreme neo-Nazis;
8. understanding this blatant NATO neo-Nazi coup the East of Ukraine rebelled;
9. pro-Kiev neo-Nazis burned 50 anti-Kiev protestors alive;
10. the NATO media and their gimps have either ignored this Nazi heritage of the junta or beatified the neo-Nazis describing them as romantic revolutionaries;
11. the rebellion has led to a war in which 7000 civilians, the vast majority in East Ukraine, being killed, most from bombing from the Ukraine Air Force or shelled by the Ukraine Armed Forces artillery, and serious humanitarian crisis;
12. that war led to MH17 being shot down, when many airlines were avoiding flying over Ukraine because of the risk;
13. and with the junta now firmly installed, a senior member of the US Embassy in Kiev, who was a former manager of USAID (CIA) funds but who 'lost' those funds, becomes Minister of Finance of Ukraine and flogs Ukraine to the IMF and Monsanto;
14. and Ukraine starts to make moves to join NATO.

Coup, anyone?

What is the difference between Crimea voting to join (or being annexed by as NATO describes it) Russia to escape being governed by rabid neo-Nazis, and Ukraine voting to join (or being annexed by as NATO would describe it) NATO after NATO executed a violent neo-Nazi coup to kick out a legitimately elected but anti-NATO government and replace it with a pro-NATO government?

Can someone explain to me what the difference is?

WHY WOULD THE BBC PULL THIS REPORT?

I trust that you have all had time to watch the NineMSN 'documentary' presented by pro-British Army reporter Michael Usher working for warmongering Nine Network. That 'documentary' focused on just one possibility: that MH17 was shot down by a BUK missile fired from a field 5Km south of Shnizhne. Usher states with theatrical certainty that this is the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.

Really?

From just one source?

And that source works in alliance with The Atlantic Council (NATO), USAID (CIA) and Open Society Foundation (Rothschild agent George Soros)?

Well how about this report by none other than the BBC.

But the BBC pulled it. Why? Well, watch and learn: multiple witnesses state on camera that fighter jets were close to MH17 when it came down. Others say the jets were using the civilian passenger planes as cover.

And what is even more biased is that earlier this week Higgins posted a video of yet another eyewitness who saw something, not sure if it was a jet or a missile. However the witness states that whatever it was came from behind MH17! And who interviewed the guy? Paris Match, the source of the photo that Belling Cat and others use.

And not only that. Yesterday Higgins tweeted two reports claiming to cite witnesses who saw all manner of things: missiles fired from separatist controlled territory; missiles fired from Ukrainian controlled territory; fighter jets; nothing at all. He gloated that nobody in the first report from De Volksrant was quoted saying they saw a fighter jet. But the second from NOS did! But can you guess which report Higgins is directing readers to? Yep. The De Volksrant report that doesn't mention jets.

Here is the report the BBC pulled. Hmm. I wonder if they pulled it because people state they and everyone else saw jets? And that other planes have been using civilian passenger planes as cover?

Remember. Many people have gone on camera to state they saw fighter jets close to MH17. But the NATO media doesn't want you to know. They only want you to know 'the truth' from blinkered Belling Cat who are now openly working for The Atlantic Council (NATO), USAID (CIA) and Open Society Foundation (Rothschild agent George Soros).



PS that Ukraine Govt spokesman looks a bit unsettled. The SBU said Cossacks at Chernukino shot down MH17 yet he has to rant about Shnizhne.

I've asked this question before: who would be guilty of MH17 if separatists did indeed shoot down MH17 but the Ukraine Air Force was flying close to MH17 to make it look like an Antonov AN26, or using MH17 as cover for a bombing raid?

Is that why the NATO media and their gimps are completely erasing from history and ignoring all statements of eyewitnesses seeing fighter jets when MH17 came down?

NINE NETWORK : WARMONGERS

Michael Usher of NineMSN just presented a 'documentary' on MH17. His only source appears to be Eliot Higgins.

A few hours ago I posted some reports of Usher's while he was with the British Army as they invaded Iraq in 2003. I trust you can see his obvious adoration of the British Army as liberators and protectors of a grateful if criminal Iraq public who need the British Army to restore law and order and all that. Pity that we turned Iraq into an unstable shit hole with Islamic State sawing off the heads of anything that moves, with citizens of the UK and Australia somehow being able to fly to NATO member Turkey to join Islamic State, who are then used as the excuse to introduce draconian surveillance laws.

But Usher works for Nine Network. What did Nine Network say about Syria, in particular Ghouta?

Well, here is an 'expert' that Nine Network used after Ghouta. Note that this 'expert', Rodger Shanahan:
1. was in the Australian Parachute Battalion Group;
2. worked at the Australian Embassy to Saudi Arabia;
3. says fuck all about the plan for war and regime change in seven countries in five years as revealed to General Wesley Clark;
4. says fuck all about The Redirection as reported by Seymour Hersh in 2007 in which Hersh stated that Saudi Arabia would unleash the worst international cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria;
5. does not mention Saudi Arabia once in this interview, even though Prince Bandar had threatened to unleash hell in Syria if Putin didn't dump Assad;
6. finally calls for war on Syria.

Weekend Today | Syria Crisis | 31 August 2013


Are you beginning to understand why Nine Network and Usher basically used Belling Cat's work, reporting it as fact when it is merely suggestion, not considering any other possibility?

MICHAEL USHER : APOLOGIST FOR BRITISH INVASION OF IRAQ IN 2003

Here are a few of the reports that Michael Usher made while in Iraq reporting on the invasion of Iraq in 2003. As you will clearly see, Usher adores the British Army, and tries to make us adore them too. I don't know about you but I get the impression that Usher's role was to portray the invasion as wanted by the people who saw the British Army as their liberators and protectors.

Big problem though Mikey: we turned the place into an unstable shit hole and gave them Islamic State!!

But I can't find anything by Usher that exposes that plan for war and regime change in seven nations in five years.

So conclude from that what you will.





NINEMSN SIXTY MINUTES DOCUMENTARY IS JUST BELLING CAT BUT WITH DRAMATIC MUSIC

Who is that presenter guy, Michael Usher, who states with absolute authority that MH17 was shot down from that field when no such claim can be made? All he has become is yet another Faustus mouthpiece of The Atlantic Council, repeating everything that Belling Cat say without looking at the bigger picture.

And here is a clue: Usher has spent years in the USA and the UK as the foreign correspondent for Nine Network, and he reported on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan from those locations. Was he an 'embedded'?

And as for Yatsenyuk appearing at the start of the 'documentary' demanding that "those bastards be brought to the Hague" etc. It is Yats, recipient of NATO funds, hand-picked by Victoria Kagan-Nuland to be PM, who should be in the Hague!! He and his gang provoked a war in which 7000 civilians in East Ukraine opposing Nazism have been blown to bits by the Ukraine military, from the air or by artillery.

It's a pity Usher didn't do another 'documentary' on the origins of the war in Donbass: Nazis, sponsored and protected by NATO, ran a violent coup to oust a legitimately elected government.

IT'S THAT FUCKING SIMPLE!!

And in the resulting war how many civilians have been killed by the neo-Nazis? SEVEN THOUSAND!! We can safely assume a quarter of them children.

The civilians of East Ukraine recognised that coup and that it was executed by Nazis, and rebelled. Fifty of them paid the price in Odessa when pro-Kiev neo-Nazis burned them alive, the neo-Nazis shooting at those jumping from 2nd floor windows to escape the flames, and beating to death those who survived the jump.

At Christmas 2013 Ukraine was relatively stable, and there was no suggestion of a civil war. A protest was all it was. But then in February 2014 the neo-Nazis started shooting protestors and police from The Conservatory. This provoked the violent ousting of Yanukovich, who had irked the NATO powers by signing a deal with Russia instead of with the EU/IMF.

What followed was a rebellion by civilians of East Ukraine who resisted the imposition of Nazism by NATO. NATO cheered the neo-Nazis on as they burned people alive. NATO media beatified the neo-Nazis, either pretending not to notice the blatant Nazism or describing the violent Nazis as romantic revolutionaries (who burn people alive?).

And in the resulting war, in which NATO is supporting the Nazis while Russia is opposing the Nazis, seven thousand, repeat SEVEN THOUSAND, civilians have died at the hands of the Nazis, most bombed in their homes or in the street from the air by the Ukraine Air Force or shelled by the Ukraine Armed Forces artillery. And repeat, that's CIVILIANS, not military personnel. That's men, women and children opposing the imposition of Nazis by NATO onto Ukraine...BLOWN TO BITS...for opposing NATO Nazism!!

But let's get back to this 'documentary'. It is just blinkered Belling Cat with some dramatic music.

As I said, Yats makes a guest star appearance, almost with (fake Nazi) tears in his eyes as he demands that the perps of MH17 be dragged to the Hague (but not mentioning that he receives NATO funds and was hand-picked by Victoria Kagan-Nuland to become PM after the US/NATO-run coup). If Yats and his crew hadn't executed the coup then MH17 would probably be flying in the skies right now. But no. He and his wicked sponsors had to play geopolitics and give Putin a poke in the eye after Putin had denied the NATO powers their war on Syria in August 2013. It is the NATO powers who have unleashed the worst kind of international cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria, who have eventually morphed into Islamic State. And it is the US/NATO who ran the coup against Yanukovich. The biggest clue is that a former senior officer at the US Embassy Kiev, who managed USAID (CIA) funds but who somehow managed to lose those funds, is somehow now the Minister for Finance of Ukraine!! Her first action was to flog Ukraine to the IMF and Monsanto. And now Ukraine is making overtures to join NATO.

The documentary didn't look at any of the other possibilities, in particular ignoring the many eyewitnesses who saw a fighter jet. And this is important because a fighter jet may not have shot down MH17, but if fighter jets were in the area at the time then, assuming the separatists had a BUK, they may have deliberately provoked the separatists into shooting down MH17 by pretending to escort MH17 as if it were a UAF An26, or more nefariously trying to spoof the BUK radar into thinking that MH17 was a military plane. The Ukraine Air Force had been bombing civilians in Shnizhne the days before 17th July 2014.

And Usher also explicitly calls Russia liars but does not call Ukraine liars, which is just complete bias, because if Usher believes so strongly that MH17 was shot down from that field 5Km south of Shnizhne then he must also believe that the Ukraine Security Service are liars for putting out that tape which the SBU said proved 100% beyond doubt that Cossacks at Chernukino shot down MH17.

This 'documentary' was not journalism. It was propaganda.

And Usher's background as foreign corespondent based for years in the USA and UK, and his war reporting, suggests that he, like Roland Oliphant, might have other backgrounds.








Saturday, May 16, 2015

ISLAMIC STATE OIL MINISTER KILLED. BUT BY WHOM?

The USA is claiming credit for the death of Islamic State's Oil Minister, a Mr Abu Sayyaf.

But apparently the USA didn't tell Syria what the plan was, so the USA just invaded Syrian airspace and took him out.

You see, the USA can invade anyone's airspace. I'd be very surprised if Roland Oliphant wrote an article about this blatant incursion by the USA into Syrian airspace.

But this is the purpose, or one of the purposes, of Islamic State. The USA can now invade Syrian airspace, and nobody cares about international law. Before 2014 this would have been impossible.

Other purposes of Islamic State are:
1. to introduce oppressive surveillance legislation to protect us from returning Jihadis;
2. to clampdown on free speech.

ANOTHER OLIPHANT PROPAGANDA PIECE AGAINST RUSSIA

Roland Oliphant claims to be the first to have identified the field where the alleged BUK missile was allegedly launched from 5Km south of Shnizhne. This field is also the favourite of RTL Nieuws and Belling Cat, but not Correctiv and Der Spiegel who believe that a field 3Km north of Shnizhne was the alleged launch point, or the SBU who believe that Cossacks based at Chernukino shot down MH17. Oliphant went to that field and found a piece of plastic. Belling Cat and RTL were ecstatic, believing that the plastic belonged to a BUK system. But guess what? IT DIDN'T! It belonged to a battery case used by a vehicle other than a BUK. But maybe that vehicle or its crew were the source of the fire in that field on 17th July?

Anyway, Oliphant has compiled this list of alleged incursions by Russia into NATO space. See Mapped: Just how many incursions into Nato airspace has Russian military made? for further explosive details.

Well, actually, explosive is completely the wrong adjective.

Out of the 15 'suspected' (his word) incursions of NATO airspace and waters, how many are undeniable? NONE!!

According to Oliphant, there were 3 incidents involving suspected Russian submarines off the west coast of Ireland. Note the key word : suspected. A sub is a sub. It could have been one of ours, or American. Russia is not the only country to have subs. And on the subject of submarines, Oliphant also includes the laughable incidents in Scandanivia. Last year Sweden claimed a Russian sub had somehow travelled up the narrow channels near Stockholm. The Swedish Navy went on a massive sub hunt. NATO media suggested it was time for Sweden to join NATO. But guess what? Just a few weeks ago the Swedish Navy said that the threatening vessel was...NOT A RUSSIAN SUBMARINE!! But the Swedish Navy got a massive injection of cash from the scare...

Note to Oliphant : Sweden is not a member of NATO anyway, so this laughable incident should not have been included. And Oliphant knows it. When this incident was occuring Oliphant wrote an article for The Daily Telegraph, entitled Why would a Russian submarine enter Swedish waters? suggesting reasons why Russia would risk sending a sub into the narrow channels near Stockholm. In that article Oliphant states that Sweden is not a member of NATO. But the possible reasons that Oliphant suggests are these:
1. servicing underwater spy equipment, perhaps installed during the Cold War, or possibly shadowing Swedish navy exercises;
2. Russia wanted the sub to get caught;
3. extract spies.

Did you laugh? I did. A guffaw and a giggle.

Oliphant also quoted the rumour that the Russian sub was nuclear and was threatening an underwater Chernobyl. The source of this claim? UKRAINE!!

And if you go to the latest article about alleged incursions that were definitely Russian, there were none. In fact, you could argue that Russia was being harassed in international airspace!!

There was one possibly dangerous incident off the coast of Cornwall on 28th January, but besides that:
1. no Russian planes have made incursions into NATO airspace, but Russian planes were harassed in international air space;
2. 3 incidents involving a submarine off the west coast of Ireland, but they could be due to subs other than Russian;
3. Oliphant includes the recent incidents involving Sweden and Finland, neither of whom are members of NATO, and in the Swedish incident the suspected sub turned out to be NOT Russian, and in the Finland case the alleged sub was not said to be Russian.

So it looks like Oliphant has an anti-Russia agenda.

Which makes me wonder how Oliphant identified that field so quickly and why he went to that field and raised suspicions that a BUK had been there through a piece of plastic, which turned out not to be from a BUK at all.

Hmm...






A VERY CURIOUS COINCIDENCE

In addition to the De Volksrant article, there is this from NOS.


As you can see Higgins has only cited the statements of anonymous farmers who say on 17th July they were told to put out a fire in a field and then plough it over. That field is where Belling Cat and others believe a BUK missile that allegedly shot down MH17 was launched.

You should note by now that everyone quoted in NATO media reports as saying they saw or heard a missile is anonymous.

On the other hand, 8 eyewitnesses have gone on camera to state they saw fighter jets. And another even described with his hands as well as verbally on camera how something attacked MH17 from behind.

This NOS report also cites witnesses who say, anonymously, they saw fighter jets:
In the village there are also enough to find witnesses who assert with great certainty that Flight MH17 was shot down by Ukrainian fighters. Several people say that day to have seen two fighters. Almost all the witnesses can tell stories about the noise from the jets. The city Snizjnoje was attacked a few days earlier by the military. On July 16 were shot down two fighters in this area.

[source : Google translation of: In het spoor van de Buk]

But what is curious (and suspicious) about this NOS article is that they appear to have interviewed the same people as the De Volksrant article: an alleged volunteer from Russia who reportedly says the people of Donbass are just miners who can't fight and who are always drunk (thus giving the impression that the people of Donbass are not worth fighting for and can be destroyed by a bunch of NATO Nazis); a drunk man who says he saw a missile launched from Ukrainian held territory (giving the impression that anyone who says that Ukraine shot down MH17 with a BUK is a drunk).

But who do you believe more: someone prepared to go on camera and state something; or someone to allegedly say something anonymously?

A criminal investigation cannot rely on such poor standards of evidence. Would you like to be tried by a prosecutor who is allowed to use evidence from anonymous sources?

The only solution is to have an open and transparent investigation by a truly independent international team, as requested by Dutch families, a request that was denied by the Dutch PM. What we get instead is an 'investigation' run by a founding member of NATO which relies on evidence provided by Ukraine, both of whom want Ukraine to become a member and thus have a motive for extreme bias.

And who or what is NOS? It is the equivalent of the BBC and is obviously controlled by Dutch intelligence: in an emergency NOS can takeover all other broadcasters in the Netherlands.

Can you remember who is accused of interfering with, obstructing and guiding the MH17 investigation? Yep. The Dutch Intelligence Services. The Netherlands and Belgium are run by Bilderberg and NATO.

And innit funny how Higgins jumped on the field-on-fire bit but not the fighter-jets bit? Both were allegedly stated anonymously. It's just that some have gone on camera to state they saw fighter jets, and the BBC pulled a report because of their statements!!




I LAUGHED WHEN I READ THIS. I THINK YOU WILL TOO.

The latest buzz regarding MH17 is this article in De Volksrant.



Apparently someone from De Volksrant went to Donbass and asked a few questions about BUKs and missiles. But despite the alleged atmosphere of fear, which the articles alleged 'witnesses' cite, the reporter lived to tell the tale!

I have a Google translation of the article (original is in Dutch). Only one 'witness' is named, a nurse called Galina, who is quoted as saying that all she heard was the bang of MH17 exploding. No missiles. No planes. Just a bang.

Another 'witness' who is not named, but who apparently asked the reporter to say "hello" to a Mike Thijssen from Waalwijk, says that he saw a missile fired from Ukrainian territory. But the article casts doubt on this 'witness' by describing him as "of a vodka bottle armed with a thin man", suggesting he is a drunk.

And it seems Pyotr Fedotov was also interviewed. Fedotov is the man who Reuters says saw a missile fired from rebel-held territory but was afraid to say so on camera. Fedotov then told RT that he said no such thing. RT has asked Reuters to show the interview in full. So far Reuters has not done so. But this De Volksrant article tries to destroy Fedotov's credibility, which is funny considering this is supposed to be a piece of reporting, not propaganda, right?

Anyway, the reporter went to the village where Fedotov lives. Did the reporter find anyone who saw or a heard a missile? Nope. Here is what the translation says:
Facing a Reuters reporter told some residents of the village that they had seen happen to a rocket. The colossus zigzagged a bit in the air, indicating that the missile must be fired nearby. But if we walk the Red October Street, no one appears to have seen or noticed. One man even said not to have heard the massive explosion of the device. A Muscovite in a shiny tracksuit, whose mother lives in the village, waves aside reports of a BUK missile away. All nonsense. Later we find out that he was the man who had told Reuters about the zigzagging missile, though he recanted those statements again to the Russian TV. Apparently he liked to conceal it better that fudge to us.

NOBODY IN THAT VILLAGE SAW OR HEARD ANYTHING!!

If Reuters released the Fedotov interview then I'll trust them. But when then the dude who runs Reuters sits on the board of The Atlantic Council then I'm sceptical that the full interview will be released.

But this is apparently contradicted by a woman from a nearby village who says she saw and heard the missile. But again, she is anonymous. But curiously, even though it seems nobody in the hamlet Red October saw or heard anything anything from 2Km away, the residents of the tower block where the photo of the alleged plume of smoke was taken saw the plume clearly, from 14 km away!! But again, nobody would give their name.

So who owns De Volksrant? Christian van Thillo. His family own several newspapers in Belgium, and he is very much the Rupert Murdoch of Belgium. In fact Murdoch is van Thillo's idol!

Is van Thillo a member of Bilderberg? Apparently not, but he does mingle with some very dodgy people, as you would expect of a member of the elite of Belgium, home of NATO and the Marc Dutroux. Van Thillo is a member of Le Cercle de Lorraine. Guess who are also members? Bilderberg supremo Etienne Davignon, and Count Maurice Lippens, also Bilderberg. Both are accused as kiddie-fiddlers.

Van Thillo is currently the Chairman of the European Publishers Council.

But read this. A former employee of van Thillo accuses him of tyranny and editorial control!!

Mediatycoon Christian Van Thillo in voetsporen Rupert Murdoch


So let's recap:
1. this De Volksrant article has apparently found 'witnesses' who saw/heard a missile, or saw a plume of smoke from 14km away, but we do not know their names or see their faces;
2. those people who could be identified, including Fedotov, say they saw nothing or a missile fired from Ukrainian territory;
3. no fighter jets are mentioned but is the reporter telling us everything he was told, or just what he wants us to read, or what his editor wants us to read?
3. and De Volksrant is owned by Christian van Thillo who mingles with Bilderbergers and accused kiddie-fiddlers, is accused of being a tyrant and of editorial control, and who idolises Rupert Murdoch;

What we need to know about van Thillo is how his newspapers have reported on Dutroux, Syria and Ukraine.

And lest we forget: Belgium is the home of NATO.

Sleep tight...

Friday, May 15, 2015

GETTING BETTER : JUST 6 MINUTES TODAY

It took just 6 minutes this morning before a browser window appeared after I clicked the icon...and it worked OK first time!!

So 2 days ago 25 minutes. Yesterday 12 minutes. Today 6 minutes.

Can anyone spot a pattern?

INANE IAIN T4-SMITH PERSECUTES DISABLED

Before starting their alleged holocaust of the Jews, the Nazis began on the disabled through their T4 program.

Guess what inane Iain T4-Smith is doing?

Yep. Starting on the disabled.

The bankers created Hitler and Nazi Germany.

We bailed out the bankers, and the T4 Tories are picking on the disabled to pay for the banker's debts.

While T4-Smith lives like a Lord in his mansion with a swimming pool and tennis courts, the disabled are being forced to turn to loan sharks and food banks.



Thursday, May 14, 2015

EVERYBODY SHIT THEIR PANTS! RUSSIA IS FLYING PLANES IN INTERNATIONAL AIRSPACE!

The usual suspects are drumming up total fear of Russia again.

And once again the fear should be due to Russia flying planes.

Do you know where?

In international airspace.

I know! How dare they.

How dare they fly their planes in international airspace and sail their ships in international waters!

The cheek of those Rooskies!

This planet belongs to NATO and the kiddie-fiddlers who run the planet. Haven't the Rooskies learned that yet?

JUST A FEW SANCTIMONIOUS TWEETS FROM THE UK DELEGATION TO NATO

Fancy a laugh?

Yeah. Me too.

I know, let's go to the twitter feed of the UK delegation to NATO.



NATO just ran a violent neo Nazi coup to kick out a legitimately elected government and installed their puppets, one of whom I suspect is a CIA agent, and provoked a civil war in which the neo Nazis have murdered 6000 civilians of East Ukraine opposing that Nazism (Psst. But don't tell The Guardian).



Again, NATO just ran a violent neo Nazi coup to kick out a legitimately elected government and installed their puppets, one of whom I suspect is a CIA agent, and provoked a civil war in which the neo Nazis have murdered 6000 civilians of East Ukraine opposing that Nazism (Psst. But don't tell The Guardian).



Actually, if you read the Belling Cat report no driver claims to have driven a BUK into Ukraine, and there is still no conclusive evidence either that a Russian BUK was in Ukraine. Suggestion, yes. Proof, no. This is just another classic example of the role of Belling Cat: to provide a report which is published as fact when it is merely supposition, the media run with it, the knackered gullible people believe the media and before we know it nukes are flying.

I like this:


No! Is he at the local police station assisting police with their enquiries into propagating war crimes in Syria?

Aaaah. D'you know what? I feel a bit better now.

Thanks NATO.

THE BACKSLASH IS BACK

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\!!!!

THIS IS PROBABLY DUE TO THE SMARTARSES AT LANGLEY OR GCHQ

I am currently preparing a Latex document, which some may know is based on lots of keywords that all begin with a backslash.

Can you guess which character my keyboard does not print out now in the environment I am using? Although I have been using it this morning?

Yep. The backslash.

I can print it here \ but in my Latex environment it now comes out as #. And nothing produces it now, no shift of any letter etc, but it was working this morning.

I'll just have to copy and paste one in whenever I need one.

Yet more low level harassment.

Cheers!

IF YOU SHOT DOWN MH17 YOU'D WANT TO KEEP IT SECRET, YEAH?

If you'd shot down MH17 you'd want to keep it secret, yeah?

Well they tried.

On August 7th, three weeks after Malaysian Airlines flight MH17 was shot down over East Ukraine, a secret agreement was signed between the Netherlands, Belgium, Australia and Ukraine about the investigation into the disaster. The Dutch Public Prosecution Service was to lead the investigation, as two-thirds of the victims had the Dutch nationality.

Details about this secret agreement were revealed on August 29th by Eurojust. There appears to be a non-disclosure agreement in which one of the four countries has the power to veto the publication of results of the investigation. It appears that Malaysia also participated in the talks about forming a joint investigation team (JIT), but refused to sign the agreement. The result is that Malaysia now is only part of the technical investigation team, and not part of the team behind the criminal probe.

[source : Secret agreement about the research into downing of MH17 Malayisian plane remains secret, Solidarity with the Antifascist Resistance in Ukraine, https://ukraineantifascistsolidarity.wordpress.com/2014/11/24/secret-agreement-about-the-research-into-downing-of-mh17-malayisian-plane-remains-secret/, 24th November 2014]

And just to make sure I have my history correct: we did fight WW2 to destroy the Nazis, not to not-so-secretly support them later as they killed 6000 civilians of East Ukraine fighting that Nazism?

My grandfathers, possibly yours too, invaded France on 6th June 1944, for that?

SKY NEWS RUNS WITH BELLING CAT

Oh dear.

The neutrality of Belling Cat as journalists just took another dive.

Besides relationships with USAID (which is a front for the CIA), The Atlantic Council (NATO war machine), George Soros (Rothschild agent) and CIJA (who prosecute the rape victim not the rapist to advance US/NATO imperialism), now Sky News has run with the Belling Cat report on the Russian military convoy of late June 2014.

You do know who runs Sky News, don't you? Rupert Murdoch? Bilderberg? Loved Margaret Thatcher and Tony Blair?

The quotes the Sky News report takes from the report are very, very selective. For instance, this quote which is quoted as fact:
'...Buk 3x2 was transported via the M4 highway to Donetsk, Russia, and subsequently crossed the border through a field south of Severniy during the night of 16 to 17 July.

'After the downing of MH17, the same Buk missile launcher crossed the border again at the same location in the early morning of 18 July 2014.'

[source : Case mounts against Russians in MH17 crash, Sky News, http://www.skynews.com.au/news/world/europe/2015/05/14/case-mounts-against-russians-in-mh17-crash.html, 14th May 2015]

There is absolutely no evidence to back that lot up. None whatsoever.

The MH17 JIT say that a BUK was seen in Severniy early 17th July. But who told them that? We don't know. An anonymous SBU informant? How did they know it was 3x2? Did they actually see it? In the dark of the night?

Similarly for the alleged return journey. SBU counterintel chief Naida said that by 4am all Russian military hardware was back in Russia. If so then what was that BUK with 3 missiles doing in a western suburb of Luhansk at 5am allegedly on 18th July? Possibly Naida is lying, or that film was not filmed on 18th July, or both. And how do we know that that BUK is 3x2? We don't.

It would have been more accurate to say, "We think that ...", or, "We believe that...". But no. Assumptions are stated as fact...and The Murdoch press loves it.

I wonder what input The Atlantic Council had in this latest report.

But isn't it funny, or not, that Sky News runs with this Belling Cat report, as do Canada at NATO and many others, that MH17 has been solved. See this:


This is Belling Cat's role: to produce reports like this, state assumption as fact, the NATO media then report it as fact, and the gullible NATO public think that Russia shot down MH17 and thus support sanctions and possible war against Russia, when nothing has been proven, only suggested.

But what is really funny is that NATO media and the Murdoch press have worshipped and beatified the neo-Nazis that NATO ran to oust a legitimately elected government which has led to the deaths of 6000 civilians of East Ukraine fighting that Nazism. This fact is omitted.

And I'll tell you what else isn't funny at all: the complete ignorance of the 8 eyewitnesses who have stated on camera that they say saw a fighter jet close to MH17 when it was shot down, and another who says on camera, indicating with his hands, that MH17 was attacked from behind, suggesting an attack from the UAF, in complete contradiction to that amateurish image of an arc intercepting a line over Donetsk produced by the US State Dept.

SEYMOUR HERSH

Is it just a coincidence that Hersh publishes old data, which is only half true and thus still hides the true story, as if it were new, which implicates Obama in a massive cover-up over the death of Osama bin Laden, just as Israel and the Saudis don't want Obama to come to a deal with Iran?

Particularly when Obama tried to influence the recent elections in Israel against Netanyahu?

And when there is growing pressure for Obama to release the 28 pages that are assumed to reveal a fuller picture of the role of the Saudis in 9/11?

NOT BAD. ONLY 12 MINUTES TODAY.

Yesterday it was 25 minutes before I had a functioning browser window working.

This morning it was just 12 minutes...but that still involved a reboot when 6 minutes after clicking my browser icon a window had still not appeared.

So how long do we think it will take tomorrow?

Wednesday, May 13, 2015

PUTIN AT WAR

There's this Twitter hashtag going around, probably from the CIA, similar to French Fries rebranded Freedom Fries before the USA invaded Iraq and killed half a million Iraqis.

#PutinAtWar.

#PutinAtWar.

It has the ominous threat behind it. Putin is at war...and he's gonna' getcha'!

But who has been at war recently?

Yes, Putin has been at war...with Islamic terrorists in the Caucasus who want a Caliphate like Islamic State. And yes, there was a brief war with Georgia, but that was provoked by Wall Street agent Shaakashvili after he ordered the shelling of civilians of South Ossetia as they slept in their beds at night.

So what of NATO and the USA?

Well, where do we begin?

Afghanistan. Iraq. Libya. Proxy war in Syria. One million deaths in total.

And before that - smashed up Yugoslavia through naked aggression and proxy wars.

And before that - attempted coup in Venezuela, just the latest interference in Latin America.

And before that - Goddam Vietnam.

#PutinAtWar refers to Putin's latest egotistical warmongering adventure in Ukraine.

But do you know what NATO just did and are doing in Ukraine? They used bona fide neo-Nazis to oust a legitimately elected government and installed their puppets: Yats, recipient of NATO funds and hand-picked by the USA to be PM; Natalie Jaresko, former senior officer at the US Embassy in Kiev, and also former manager of USAID (CIA) funds, funds that she somehow managed to 'lose', but who is now Minister of Finance eagerly flogging Ukraine to the IMF and Monsanto.

And the likes of Luke Harding and Jeroen Akkermans write nothing about this, instead worshipping and beatifying the neo-Nazis!!

So if Putin is at war it is not because he is a bloodthirsty warmonger on a quest for global domination. That is NATO's quest. It will be because NATO wants to plonk first strike nuclear missiles in Ukraine aimed at Moscow...and put those nuclear missiles in the hands of neo-Nazis.



INITIAL REACTION BELLING CAT'S LATEST MH17 REPORT

My initial reaction is : Yes. So what?

Russia transported BUKs down to the border. So what?

But the report does not establish when the BUKs got into or out of Ukraine, if they were in Ukraine at all.

According to a video published to YouTube64 by the Joint Investigation Team,65 a Buk missile launcher was seen around midnight on 17 July (the night between 16 and 17 July) in “Сєверний“(Syeverniy) in Ukraine as well as in the early morning (around 5:00 AM) of 18 July driving through Lugansk in the direction of the border. An article published 19 July66 on a Ukrainian news site (mainly consisting of an interview with the head of Ukraine’s security service, Vitaly Naida), indicated that the missile launcher was seen on 18 July around 2:00 AM in Lugansk oblast traveling in the direction of “Северный - Верхняя Ореховка Российской Федерации“(Severniy – Verkhnyaya Orekhovka Rossiyskoy Federatsii), where, according to the article, two trucks hauling Buk missile launchers crossed the border, one of which had four missiles and the other three.61

The article went on to say that around 4:00 AM the same day, three more trucks crossed the border at that location, one hauling an empty trailer, one hauling a missile launcher with four missiles, and one hauling a military vehicle, which might have been a control unit (note: the vehicle was likely covered, so it could not be identified).

[Page 43/44]

Yet on page 44 is a frame from a video showing the infamous BUK with missing missile which clearly shows the time "around 05.00 hrs".

So you tell me why a BUK seen in Luhansk at 2am, according to Naida, on its way to Severniy would be in a west suburb of Luhansk at 5am? Did the cabin driver fancy a bacon butty from his favourite truckstop to the west of Luhansk while transporting the alleged BUK that shot down MH17? COMPLETE NONSENSE!! You'd want to get the hell out of Dodge asap, not hang around. Which implies that Naida is lying.

Remember, the source of both of all these allegations is the SBU.

We have no idea who says they saw "a Buk missile launcher...around midnight on 17 July (the night between 16 and 17 July) in “Сєверний“(Syeverniy) in Ukraine" (quote from above). For all we know that could be someone anonymously phoning the MH17 JIT!!!

But can you remember what else the SBU said?

The SBU released a sick tape cobbled together from other tapes which they said proved 100% beyond doubt that MH17 was shot down by Cossacks from Chernukino.

Yes. Good work in detecting that track through the field. But there is no evidence provided that a BUK went through that field. Other military transport may have. But that killer evidence is still elusive. At the moment is all circumstantial.

But do you know what else is circumstantial?

Earlier this week Higgins posted a video in which an eyewitness clearly says, and shows with his hands, that something (BUK missile? plane?) attacked MH17 from its rear. And that is in addition to the other 8 eyewitnesses who have gone on camera, faces clear for all to see to be identified, who say that they saw a fighter jet when MH17 was shot down.

But who interviewed this guy who says MH17 was attacked from behind? Paris Match, the same Paris Match that Belling Cat's earlier report referred to, the source of the Paris Match photo of a BUK on a trailer apparently travelling east from Donetsk.

BTW, I highlighted the contradiction in Naida's statements months ago, possibly before Christmas last year.







EVIDENCE OSAMA BIN LADEN DIED IN LATE 2001

Osama bin Laden did not claim responsibility for 9/11. Colin Powell stated that the USA would produce an extensive dossier on bin Laden's guilt for 9/11. Surprise!! The USA never did produce that dossier, or anything like a dossier.

But the USA did steam into Afghanistan and within a few years the opium harvests, which the Taliban had eradicated, were back to record levels, and those opium harvests just keep getting bigger and bigger...

You see, our ruling families have been running the opium trade for centuries. It's all there in Dope Inc by EIR.

So if bin Laden really was behind 9/11 then why go to all that trouble and deny responsibility?

And if the USA had any evidence at all that bin Laden was guilty then why has it not been released?

Perhaps because bin Laden didn't do 9/11?

Perhaps it was all a hoax so that:
1. the massive profits from Afghan opium could be restored;
2. the USA and its allies could go on a warmongering rampage as PNAC had proposed in 2000 in Rebuilding America's Defenses?

That plan revealed to General Wesley Clark is the manifestation of part 2. above.

And perhaps bin Laden didn't do 9/11 because he was not fit and healthy enough?

Osama bin Laden suffered from Marfan Syndrome and required frequent kidney dialysis. Now, you tell me how Osama bin Laden, requiring all that significant medical care and treatment, and being global public enemy number 1 after 9/11, could survive anywhere, let alone in the remote mountains of Afghanistan?

Hersh now says that Pakistan held him since 2006. That would still leave ObL with 4 years to survive in the remote mountains of Afghanistan, dragging a kidney dialysis machine behind as he somehow managed to evade capture or death at the hands of a powerful global coalition hunting him down for 9/11.

The answer lies in this: Osama Bin Laden’s Obituary Notice. December 26, 2001

Even if Hersh's latest report is true:
1. why was ObL's alleged corpse allegedly buried at sea?
2. and so quickly?
3. and without any photos?

Bin Laden died in December 2001. He was on his death bed in July 2001. But our ruling families needed the myth of bin Laden to send NATO in to kick The Taliban out and restore their massive opium profits.

And after that was achieved it was on with the warmongering as revealed to General Wesley Clark: Iraq in 2003; Lebanon in 2006; Libya in 2011; and Syria since 2011.

I SHOULD HAVE KNOWN

Higgins has tweeted that he met with CIJA...and actually praises them!



But he knows, and his disciples should too, from reading this blog that:
1. the series of wars that have been executed in North Africa and the Middle East since 9/11 are all a massive conspiracy for war and regime change in seven countries in five years;
2. but by 2007 that plan was moribund so:
(a) the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia agreed that the latter would unleash the nastiest international cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria, Lebanon and Iran;
(b) to provide cover for those Jihadis as 'freedom fighters', the US State Dept ran The Arab Spring.
3. those Jihadis were first unleashed onto Libya in 2011, when NATO became the air force of al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb;
4. after slaughtering black Libyans and assassinating Gaddafi, those Jihadis were then smuggled into Syria, where they have eventually morphed into Islamic State.

Now, who are by far the biggest criminals in all this?

Assad, who is protecting his country, with virtually the full support of the Syrian people, from the nastiest international cutthroat Jihadis that the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia have unleashed onto Syria?

Or the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia for unleashing the nastiest international cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria in the first place?

Obviously the latter: the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia.

You know what they do in Saudi Arabia, don't you? Yep. They chop your head off...with a sword...like on their flag...and as held by Prince Charles when he gets down and jiggy with the Saudis.

I repeat: the CIJA is looking to prosecute the rape victim for scratching the eyes of the rapist and letting the rapist get away without charge.

I should have known Higgins would praise the CIJA, with all his increasing connections to NATO/CIA/Soros.

In 2010 there wasn't a civil war in Syria. But by late 2011 there was.

This blog explains clearly why that happened.

SEEKING JUSTICE IN SYRIA

That article in The Guardian about an organisation seeking justice in Syria allegedly smuggling out hundreds of thousands of documents allegedly incriminating the Syrian government in war crimes again proves just how biased The Guardian really is.

The article refers to a Committee for International Justice and Accountability, which is reportedly run by William Wiley, a 'former' Major of the Canadian, i.e. NATO, Army.

What they appear to be doing is prosecuting a rape victim for scratching the eyes of the rapist while allowing the rapist to get away with rape.

If you want to know a bit more about the CIJA, read this: Atrocity Accountability in Syria: What Criminal Investigations Have Uncovered .

Apparently there is a US Ambassador-at-Large for Global Criminal Justice. His name is Stephen J. Rapp.

Can you believe that? The USA actually has an Ambassador-at-Large for Global Criminal Justice.

WHAT A SICK JOKE!!

And yet there Rapp was, sat with senior members of the CIJA, Wiley included, discussing how to prosecute Assad for protecting his country from the international cutthroat Jihadis that have been unleashed onto Syria by Saudi Arabia, Israel and the USA as per The Redirection reported by Seymour Hersh!!

I repeat: WHAT A SICK JOKE!!

MY COMPUTER IS RIDICULOULSY SLOW THIS MORNING

It took nearly 25 minutes before I could get a working window up. I even had to reboot, and it is still slow.

I was expecting it to be slow/interfered with due to my open letter Prince William last night. Something usually happens after posting something controversial, usually my firewall does not start automatically and can take 5 minutes before it starts.

But this is the kind of everyday low level harassment I suffer.

Did I tell you I found a large shard of glass on the path the other morning?

IS ISRAEL USING HERSH TO GET AT OBAMA?

The target of the latest article from Seymour Hersh seems to be Obama, to discredit Obama not Hersh.

Now, who would want to damage Obama?

The Zionists.

Why now?

Why is this doubt about the official narrative being revealed now when a blogger claims she revealed it all in August 2011?

Tuesday, May 12, 2015

THE GUARDIAN IN GET-ASSAD SHOCK HORROR

I am absolutely shocked, SHOCKED!, that The Guardian is running with a headline about alleged documents allegedly smuggled out of Syria over a 3 year period which could be sent to The Commission for International Justice and Accountability to use against Assad in any trial at The Hague or elsewhere.

The documents may or may not be true. We cannot trust The Guardian. Actually, that's not quite true. I would use The Guardian as toilet paper, but only in an emergency.

But has The Guardian exposed this in which General Wesley Clark reveals the plan for war and regime change in seven countries in five years?



Or this, in which Seymour Hersh in 2007 foretold the unleashing of cutthroat Jihadis by Saudi Arabia onto Syria, Lebanon and Iran?

The Redirection by Seymour Hersh?

Er, nope.

OPEN LETTER TO HRH WILLIAM, DUKE OF CAMBRIDGE

Dear William

Please accept my apologies if I address you incorrectly. I am just a common man and the likes of me are not taught such Royal protocol at state school.

First, congratulations on the birth of your second child. I am glad that you have named her after your mother, but am disturbed that the names of your father and your grandmother take precedence. I sincerely hope that your daughter Diana grows up with your mother's love of life.

But second, how does it feel to have the blood of the engineers of World War 1, King Edward VII and King George V, running through your veins?

Did you know that it was King George V who told Germany that Great Britain would not fight in any war, thus tricking Germany into invading Belgium, while at the same time telling Sir Edward Grey to get Great Britain into any subsequent war?

Yes, the likes of me might not know Royal protocol, but we know who engineered WW1. I'm sure your mother would not have approved, if she knew. Or perhaps she did? But we will never know now.

Again, I wish you, Kate and your children well, and hope that you keep your eyes open for those "dark forces" your grandmother mentioned to Paul.






EVIDENCE THAT WILLIAM HAGUE AND PHIL HAMMOND HAVE BEEN WORKING WITH A ROGUE FACTION IN MI6

I have sent numerous letters to numerous MPs and Ministers, and all have replied...except two. Those two are William Hague and Phil Hammond. After you have read this blog you will understand why they didn't reply.

On 23rd March 2014 I sent a letter to William Hague about Ukraine and Syria. I posted that letter here in A LETTER TO WILLIAM HAGUE , and did not receive a reply.

And on 24th August 2014 I sent a similar letter to Phil Hammond which I posted here in MY LETTER TO THE EXTREMELY NAIVE FOREIGN SECRETARY PHIL HAMMOND , to which I also did not receive a reply.

In those letters I explicitly mention the following:
1. The Redirection reported by Seymour Hersh (though not by name in the letter to Hague);
2. Roland Dumas and his claims of being asked by British officials to smuggle Jihadis into Syria;
3. The plan revealed to General Wesley Clark for war and regime change in seven countries in five years.

So it is well over a year since I told Hague about these...if he didn't know already. So did he pass this information onto MI6 to see if it was true? Well, the fact that he did not reply says a lot.

Similarly for Hammond.

The information I sent to both is of a very, very serious nature, indicating an international conspiracy of astronomical magnitude to destroy the lives of millions of innocent civilians through war and regime change.

If you were Foreign Secretary and you were unaware of this information, would you pass this information onto MI6 or another group or investigator to see if it was true?

On 28th March this year I sent the following Freedom of Information request to the FCO.
To whom it may concern:

On 24th August last year I sent a letter to the Foreign Secretary asking for an inquiry into the following and more. Unfortunately the Foreign Secretary has not replied. So I am now writing to make an open government request for all the information to which I am entitled under the Freedom of Information Act 2000.

Please send me:
1. Any and all information that the FCO has or is aware of regarding or related to the agreement reached between the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia that was reported by Seymour Hersh in New Yorker magazine on 5th March 2007 in which Saudi Arabia would unleash Islamic extremists onto Syria, Lebanon and Iran.
2. Any and all information that the FCO has or is aware of regarding or related to the allegations of former French foreign minister Roland Dumas who in 2013 said that in 2009 he was approached by British officials who asked him to help them to plan the smuggling of Islamic extremists into Syria. Did officials from Great Britain approach Mr Dumas? And for this purpose? Who were they? And on whose authority?

Do not restrict the information you provide to just these questions.

I would like the above information to be provided to me as electronic copies.

If this request is too wide or unclear, I would be grateful if you could contact me as I understand that under the Act, you are required to advise and assist requesters. If any of this information is already in the public domain, please can you direct me to it, with page references and URLs if necessary.

If the release of any of this information is prohibited on the grounds of breach of confidence, I ask that you supply me with copies of the confidentiality agreement and remind you that information should not be treated as confidential if such an agreement has not been signed.

I understand that you are required to respond to my request within the 20 working days after you receive this letter. I would be grateful if you could confirm in writing that you have received this request.

I look forward to hearing from you.

On 1st April I received a reply containing this request for clarification:
Thank you for your email of 28 March to the Foreign and Commonwealth Office requesting information under the Freedom of Information Act.

The first part of your request was for “Any and all information that the FCO has or is aware of regarding or related to the agreement reached between the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia that was reported by Seymour Hersh in New Yorker magazine on 5th March 2007 in which Saudi Arabia would unleash Islamic extremists onto Syria, Lebanon and Iran.”

I am writing to ask you to consider clarifying the scope of this part of your request. As currently drafted this would go over the statutory limit set under the FOI act and we would be unable to proceed with it.

Would it be possible for you to refine this part of your request? E.g. could you specify a particular timeframe and could you be more specific about the information that you are interested in?

We will then accept your revised request and establish whether we hold any information relating to it before considering the appropriate course of action.


On 2nd April I replied with this clarification:
OK.

My initial request was for information on two events. I believe the two are linked.

Regarding your request of me refine my initial request, I would like to know:
1. was the FCO or any proxy agent of the FCO, e.g. MI6, involved in the discussions leading up to the decision taken that was reported by Seymour Hersh in his report of 5th March 2007? If so, who was it and on whose authority?
2. is the FCO aware of the publication of Hersh's report? If so when and how?
3. if the FCO is aware of the plan reported in Hersh's report then has the FCO decided to go along with it? And if so why has it not reported its existence to the British public?

That should do for now.

Can you tell me what you mean by this is in your initial reply:
As currently drafted this would go over the statutory limit set under the FOI act and we would be unable to proceed with it.

What do you mean by statutory limit?

And eventually on 23rd April I recieved two emails. The first contained this from the Middle East & North Africa Department of the FCO:
Thank you for your email of 28 March asking for information under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) 2000. You asked:

1. Any and all information that the FCO has or is aware of regarding or related to the agreement reached between the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia that was reported by Seymour Hersh in New Yorker magazine on 5th March 2007 in which Saudi Arabia would unleash Islamic extremists onto Syria, Lebanon and Iran.

You clarified Q1 on 2 April to:

1. was the FCO or any proxy agent of the FCO, e.g. MI6, involved in the discussions leading up to the decision taken that was reported by Seymour Hersh in his report of 5th March 2007? If so, who was it and on whose authority?

2. is the FCO aware of the publication of Hersh's report? If so when and how?

3. if the FCO is aware of the plan reported in Hersh's report then has the FCO decided to go along with it? And if so why has it not reported its existence to the British public?

The North America Department are replying to this part of your request separately.

2. Any and all information that the FCO has or is aware of regarding or related to the allegations of former French foreign minister Roland Dumas who in 2013 said that in 2009 he was approached by British officials who asked him to help them to plan the smuggling of Islamic extremists into Syria. Did officials from Great Britain approach Mr Dumas? And for this purpose? Who were they? And on whose authority? Do not restrict the information you provide to just these questions.

I am writing to advise you that following a search of our paper and electronic records, I have established that we do not hold any information that is relevant to your request.

The second email from the North America Department of the FCO contained this:
Thank you for your e-mail of 2 April regarding the article by Mr Seymour Hersh in the New Yorker magazine on 5 March 2007. It has been passed on to the North America Department for a response.

As you would expect, the FCO has a regular dialogue with the US authorities on a broad range of foreign policy issues, and has done so for many years. The UK and US work closely together on a number of areas such as climate change, the economy and tackling terrorism. Both countries place great emphasis on the special relationship we hold, but that does not mean we automatically look to align our goals with each other. However, our partnership does have clear common agenda in ensuring our security, delivering economic growth and stability at home and across the world, and promoting our shared values.

Much of the information contained in Mr Hersh’s article relates to the US government’s foreign policy approach. As the formulation of US policy is a matter for the US authorities you may wish to contact the US Government for their views on the suggestions made in Mr Hersh’s article.

As you will be aware, there are daily media articles discussing the US government’s perceived foreign policy approach. Whilst North America Department is aware of some of these articles, it is not possible to monitor all of the media articles that discuss US foreign policy. I can confirm however that the information covered within this article would have had no impact on how the UK government formulated its own foreign policy agenda. If you require information about the Foreign and Commonwealth Office’s foreign policy approach please visit - https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/foreign-commonwealth-office/about

Kind Regards

North America Department

So The North America Department is apparently unaware of The Redirection and the plan revealed to General Wesley Clark.

And The Middle East & North Africa Department are unaware of them and also of the claims of Dumas.

So we can deduce that either the FCO is lying, or that a rogue faction within MI6 approached Dumas.

And if a rogue faction within MI6 did approach Dumas without the permission of the Foreign Secretary then surely after I had written to both Hague and Hammond they should have investigated it, and if it had been investigated then it should have been an official investigation and records and findings made and kept.

But it looks like nothing happened. Life went as normal: international cutthroat Jihadis slit the throats of Syrian children and eventually morphed into Islamic State, who are now being used as the reason for the British government to intrude into every communication we make...just in case we are terrorists.

So apparently the FCO was unaware of:
1. The Redirection reported by Seymour Hersh, but it is now;
2. Roland Dumas and his claims of being asked by British officials to smuggle Jihadis into Syria;, but it is now;
3. The plan revealed to General Wesley Clark for war and regime change in seven countries in five years, but it is now.

So did Hague and Hammond pass on the information? Even though I sent details of these and more to both Foreign Secretaries William Hague and Phil Hammond?

That is the next question to answer.

If they didn't then they are protecting a rogue faction in MI6 because it looks like everything that has gone on Syria has been "off the books".

And the fact that neither of them replied to my letters, when every other letter I have sent to an MP or Minister or Government department has been replied to, speaks volumes and volumes of potential guilt in war crimes.