Saturday, August 30, 2014


George Galloway, a member of the British Parliament, has been assaulted by someone who shouted something about the Holocaust, so it is assumed the assailant is a Zionist.

I wish George a speedy recovery and that the assailant has not damaged the jaw that exposes the horrors of Zionism.


Yep. Three days into yet another alleged invasion of Ukraine by Russia, and yep, still no evidence.

No evidence from Kiev.

No evidence from OSCE observers on the ground in Ukraine.

But more importantly, no evidence from Brown Moses!!

What ever can this mean?

Has he even tried to do his duty for the Kiev fascists? Has he tried but given up because there is no invasion? Or has he finally realised just who is running and using him to help some really nasty pieces of work gain more power? In Ukraine? In Syria? In Gaza?

Friday, August 29, 2014


The terror threat for the UK has been raised from substantial to severe, even though there is no threat (that we are being told about). This raise is, we are told, due to The Islamic State.

And yes, that's the same Islamic State that grew out of the rebels in Syria who have been funded and supported militarily and politically by us and our allies such as Saudi Arabia in an illegal attempt to overthrow the ruler of another country, and whose ranks have been filled by British Jihadis who have been encouraged to go to Syria by deranged preachers like Michael Adebalajo who are allowed to preach Jihad on the streets and in the mosques of Great Britain.

We just want to terrify you because we love you.

Are you terrified and lovin' it?


Today I visited The International Slavery Museum on Albert Docks, Liverpool.

And what a huge disappointment.

Tucked quietly away on the 3rd floor, the museum seemed to be more of a token gesture to hide Liverpool's crucial role in the Transatlantic Slave Trade. There is more space reserved for The Beatles across the city than revealing Liverpool's role in the TST. And yet Liverpool was the key port for the sickening trade that made many fortunes, not just in Liverpool but in The West Indies, and of course that of The Crown.

And what made it even worse and laughable was a poster that equated MLK and Obama.

One of the better things at the museum was not part of the exhibition at all, but was a note written by a visiting child, that simply read, "For give us" [sic].

It is still worth visiting, but you have to ask why the 2nd floor is dedicated to just The Titanic and a few other ships, while the 3rd floor which is The International Slavery Museum has only a small part dedicated to the most gruesome middle passage, with more space reserved for stuff that makes it feel like it is all over and is a thing of the past.

The psyche that implemented the TST is still alive and well and living amongst us. Instead of crude metal chains we have the loan and mortgage that are financed by money created out of thin air yet are expected to be paid off with physical goods and/or hard physical labour.

And ignorance of all this is reinforced by the education system.

There. There. Be a good slave.


A few weeks ago Ukraine claimed to have destroyed a column of invading Russian military hardware. They have yet to provide any proof. And not even their go-to man, Brown Moses, has found and/or published any evidence yet. The fascist authorities in Kiev and The US State Department are beginning to get rather annoyed with Brown Moses over the failure of himself and his crew to back up their claims.

And before this unverified claim, Malaysian Airlines MH17 crashed in East Ukraine. The fascist authorities in Kiev and The US State Department immediately accused Russia and/or pro-Russian separatists of shooting down MH17 with a BUK. Brown Moses did his duty for the fascists and searched and searched and searched many, many videos, eventually cobbling together a proposed journey of the alleged BUK that shot down MH17 as it creeped back to Russia. However, Moses uses one video that was actually shot in a part of Ukraine occupied by the fascist authorities in Kiev. The US State Department relied heavily on Brown Moses and his crew, answering queries from international media on where the evidence was with replies of, "It's all on social media". But isn't it funny that the US military and intelligence community have NOT backed up the claims that Russia and/or pro-Russian separatists shot down MH17 with a BUK? And isn't it even funnier, or more evil, that the fascist authorities in Kiev have not released the records of communications between MH17 and Ukraine Air Traffic Controllers? Particularly when one tweeted that Kiev shot down MH17 and his twitter account very quickly shut down? And isn't it even funnier that Russia provided radar evidence that MH17 was tracked by what is assumed to be a fighter jet belonging to Kiev? And isn't it even funnier that this all occured just a few days after the long, hard work of President Putin of Russia bore fresh fruit with the birth of an alternative financial system to the bloodsucking IMF/Federal Reserve system?

So when NATO claim that Russia has invaded Ukraine (again) and provides an aerial photo/picture or two, which is then cited by all and sundry that something must be done to stop Putin, then I say, do not start World War 3 until Brown Moses has confirmed that Russia has invaded Ukraine.

He is the expert. He is the man that the fascist authorities in Kiev and The US State Department go to for confirmation of any event that occured in Ukraine.

Or in Syria.

Or in Iraq.

Or in Libya.

Or in Gaza.

Thursday, August 28, 2014


I cannot believe that Brown Moses and his crew would spend so much time analysing video after video after video to determine the precise route that the Syrian military captured at Tabqa were forced to march before being executed.

What is this sick fascination with the death of hundreds of members of the Syrian military?

Would Brown Moses and his crew be much better off watching the following video and then passing it on to their friends and families and MPs?

And then reading the article by Seymour Hersh entitled The Redirection, New Yorker Magazine, 7th March 2005 which explains that Plan A revealed to Clark failed so Plan B using cutthroat Jihadis in Syria was unleashed?

I know he has a kid, but for fucks sake. Think about who is actually running the country that that kid is being brought up in and what they are doing in Syria and Ukraine and elsewhere.

I honestly think that there is something psychologically missing with someone who can analyse so many videos for brick factories and power lines to determine the route of a March of Death for members of a Syrian military who are defending their country, and the world, from NATO/Saudi-sponsored cutthroat terrorists.



From Lavrov: Russia instructed the US that any airstrikes on terrorists in Syria should be done with approval of Damascus

Moscow, SANA-Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said Wednesday his country has instructed the US that in case Washington decides to direct airstrikes on terrorists’ sites in Syria without Syrian official approval, this will be considered as a flagrant violation of the international law.

“The Americans announce that they will bomb terrorists on the Syrian lands with no need of any approval… we have told them this will be a flagrant violation of the international law,” Lavrov said during a meeting with participants at the International Youth Forum of Seliger.

He added combating terrorism is a need, thanks God, the US has at last acknowledged that terrorists are in the front who fight against the Syrian Government, but in order to isolate those terrorists, the US has to coordinate with the Syrian authorities.



The Devil, Benjamin Netanyahu, has claimed victory in the recent outrageous attack on The Gaza Strip.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said the seven-week conflict in Gaza ended in "victory".

The Palestinian Islamist Hamas movement was "hit hard and got none of its demands," Mr Netanyahu said.

[source : Gaza conflict: Israeli PM Netanyahu says war was 'victory', BBC,, 27th August 2014]

For whatever reason, several agencies all report slightly different numbers of dead, but 2200 seems to be a common estimate, including over 500 children.

Perhaps we should send Bibi an e-card from Moonpig, one that says, "Bibi. Proud of you. Well done."

What a stunning victory!!

Wednesday, August 27, 2014


This Disunited Fascist Queendom has been cursed with Savilery.

White. Black. Catholic. Jewish. Pakistani.


There are Saviles in all races and all creeds. A lot of them are protected, for one reason or another; blackmail; politics; money.

This Disunited Fascist Queendom has been cursed with Savilery.

What have we done to deserve such a curse upon this nation?

Where do I start?

Engineering World War 1? World War 2? Possibly and probably World War 3?

The Transatlantic Slave Trade?

Communism (through Karl Marx)?

Fascism (through financial and political support for Hitler and Mussolini)?

All the above were primarily due to the Establishment.

But as always, the Establishment don't suffer one little bit.

Those poor girls in Rotherham weren't Grosvenors. Or Cecils. Or Windsors.

But what of the NATO media?

A group of Pakistani men abuse 1400 white girls in South Yorkshire over 16 years and it's heads must roll and the Asian community must ask itself some serious questions. And so it should be. This truly is a terrible, abhorrent series of crimes.

But in just one month Israel kills, repeat kills, over 2000 Palestinians, over 500 of them children, in an engineered war and where in the NATO media is a similar condemnation of Jews?

Just putting things into perspective.


Continuing the 'friends' theme...

This performance is cut short at the very end, but the rest is just top quality!

James Taylor & Carole King - You've Got a Friend (HQ)


Since this radio excerpt was made there have been reports that the Foley execution video was a masterpiece in fakery.

Who has the skills to make such a fake?

Did the 'non lethal' aid that the British Government provided to the Syrian rebels, that was explicitly stated to be used for media and propaganda, eventually come to be used against us in the form of this video?


That northern working class bloke is me.

I told you in July last year that there was something huge coming to Syria to provoke a war on Syria, providing analysis after analysis after analysis on why such an event was being planned and executed, naming names.

I told you a few months ago that Netanyahu was about to launch another war on Gaza.

It looks good to protest against a war after the war has started, but being able to say when a war or war provocation is about to occur, and then stop the war before it starts is even better, wouldn't you agree?

So when I say that Karl Marx was a British agent I want all the Stop The War Marxists to put their research skills to good use and start researching David Urquhart, in depth.

For it is only when we know who our true enemy is that we can begin to stop the wars.


I would recommend a pint of True North by Dunscar Bridge Brewery, which was available yesterday at The Paramount on Oxford Street, Manchester.


I can't work out what's more embarassing: Man United spending £ 60m on one player and then losing 4 - 0 to MK Dons; or Russian Paratroopers getting 'lost' and wandering over the border into Ukraine to be captured.


It's a toughie.

But I'm going with the Russian paratroopers as the most embarassing.

Where's the van Goals, van Gaal?

Tuesday, August 26, 2014


The teachers and headteacher of one of the schools I have been in recently would have been very impressed with the pro-war propaganda I saw today. I visited the Imperial War Museum North on Salford Quays, which ironically is right opposite that paragon of warmongering, the BBC.

The main exhibition has hardly changed since I last went a few years ago. According to IWMN, World War 1 just happened. So did WW2. There is very little analysis of why these wars occured, but plenty of stuff to provoke emotions. But if the museum was supposed to provoke emotions of revulsion at war then today, and my previous visits, have not provided any evidence of this. On the contrary, the machine guns and knives and awards on display all serve to provoke pro-war emotions. Young boys were telling their grandfathers, "Wow! Grandad! Look at this machine gun!".

But the most sickening thing I saw today was in a small exhibition on WW1. One wall was covered in pro-war propaganda. One poster consisted of a smartly dressed young man being ordered by I assume his mother, "Go. It's your duty, lad!". This is precisely the kind of pro-war propaganda that I saw in on the walls of a school that had been written and drawn by the students.

Monday, August 25, 2014


We were told last week that a Briton, named Jihadi John, had beheaded white American reporter James Foley.

David Cameron urgently returned from his holiday to discuss retribution. His arrival at 10 Downing Street was shown live on TV.

MI5 are spending a Bank Holiday weekend trying to identify Jihadi John.

The SAS are hunting him down in Iraq and/or Syria.

But as I suggested last week, it looks like Foley was beheaded off camera, if he was actually beheaded (and at the moment there is not that much to suggest that he wasn't beheaded, but you never know...).

But what if Jihadi John didn't behead James Foley?

What if a Saudi or Qatari did it?

Will we strip Qatar of The World Cup?

Will we bomb and/or invade Saudi Arabia?

Will we sanction Saudi Arabia?

Will we stop supplying weapons to Saudi Arabia?

Will we demand that they stop financing international cutthroat Jihadi terrorism?

Er, no.

Prince Charles and his coterie will visit and dance with them next year.

Saudi princes will be allowe4d to drink and gamble in London casinos with high class whores.

It will be cutthroat business as usual.


Last week I suggested that James Foley was beheaded off camera. Now The Daily Telegraph is reporting:
The video of James Foley’s execution may have been staged, with the actual murder taking place off-camera, it has emerged.

Forensic analysis of the footage of the journalist’s death has suggested that the British jihadist in the film may have been the frontman rather than the killer.

The clip, which apparently depicts Mr Foley’s brutal beheading, has been widely seen as a propaganda coup for Islamic State miltant group.

But a study of the four-minute 40-second clip, carried out by an international forensic science company which has worked for police forces across Britain, suggested camera trickery and slick post-production techniques appear to have been used.

[source : Foley murder video 'may have been staged', The Daily Telegraph,, 25th August 2014]

Sunday, August 24, 2014


So the SAS, who were already in Iraq before James Foley was allegedly executed, have now been tasked with hunting down Foley's killers.

One white American gets allegedly killed by a Briton, and not only does the British PM return urgently to London from his holiday, but now the elite British Special Forces SAS have been given the orders to hunt the killer down!!

Why are the SAS not in Israel hunting down the killers of over 500 innocent children in Gaza, some of whom were decapitated?

BTW. I know the name of Foley's killer: Lee Harvey Oswald III.


I have just sent the following letter to Phil.

I trust that he will have the nerve to reply to it, unlike Jihadi Hague who did not reply to a letter I sent to him earlier this year.

Please feel free to send this verbatim to Hammond, or amend it with any further information or questions that you may have.


Dear Foreign Secretary

On 11th September 2001, The World Trade Centre and The Pentagon were attacked by passenger planes. It is assumed that these planes were hijacked by members of al Qaeda under orders from Osama bin Laden, who at the time was assumed to be hiding in Afghanistan. As a consequence of this attack the USA formed a coalition and invaded Afghanistan on a hunt for bin Laden. After this invasion, we were told that Iraq had also been involved in 9/11, and also had Weapons of Mass Destruction. The USA formed yet another coalition and invaded Iraq in 2003.

But despite years of hunting for bin Laden in Afghanistan, he was not allegedly found until 2011, and allegedly in Pakistan. But what the invasion of Afghanistan did do so successfully was raise the opium harvest to record levels after the Taliban had almost eradicated opium farming. The ruling families of the United Kingdom and The United States of America have been smuggling and trading opium for centuries.

And despite all the confidence shown by political leaders in the United Kingdom and The United States of America that Iraq had WMDs and they knew where they were, over 11 years after invading Iraq we have still not found any WMDs we could call a credible threat to anyone. And again, after all that time, no credible evidence that Iraq was involved in 9/11 has been presented. In other words, we invaded Iraq on a pack of lies.

So why would we invade Iraq based on lies?

Shortly after 9/11, the former Commander of NATO forces in Europe, General Wesley Clark, was told by a Pentagon officer that the USA was going to invade Iraq, even though at the time no evidence had been found linking Iraq to 9/11, and building the case against bin Laden had only just started. A few weeks later Clark met the same officer who told Clark that the USA was going to attack seven nations in five years. Videos of Clark stating this very revealing and historically and politically important experience are easily available on Youtube. MI5 might be able to find one if you ask them nicely.

The seven nations named to Clark were:

The first four of these were named in a document entitled A Clean Break that was written in 1996 for then PM of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu. In addition, Iraq and Iran had been named in Rebuilding America’s Defenses, which was written in 2000 by The Project for a New American Century (PNAC), which interlocked with the authors of A Clean Break and virtually ran the government apparatus of President George W Bush. PNAC and A Clean Break are undeniably Zionist.
We invaded Iraq in 2003. In 2006 Israel started a war on Hezbollah after Syria had been forced to withdraw from Lebanon following the assassination of Rafik Hariri in February 2005. So by 2007 the plan revealed to Clark, for war on seven nations in five years, was moribund. Only two of the seven nations named to Clark had experienced war, and Israel had lost to Hezbollah in 2006.

To continue the war on these nations a Plan B was hatched in early 2007 that was reported by Seymour Hersh in a report entitled The Redirection published in New Yorker Magazine in March 2007. This Plan B, agreed between the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia, involved the latter unleashing extreme Sunni Islamic terrorists onto Syria, Iran and Lebanon. But in order to give these terrorists cover as ‘freedom fighters’, so that they could receive financial, military and political support from NATO, The Arab Spring was engineered by organisations in the USA, such as The National Endowment for Democracy.

These extreme Sunni Islamic terrorists were first unleashed and supported in Libya in 2011. They were members of Al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb and were assisted by British Special Forces on the ground while NATO provided air cover, bombing a path for them all the way into Tripoli after UN SCR 1973 was completely abused.

Libya was one of those nations named to Clark. Hence the series of wars that was foretold to Clark after 9/11 seems to be being implemented. So Iraq, then Lebanon, and then Libya.

After assassinating Gaddafi, these terrorists and the weapons they looted from the arsenal of the Libyan military were transported to Syria via Lebanon and Turkey.

And this is where it now gets a bit tricky.

Last year the former French foreign minister Roland Dumas told the French Parliament TV channel LCP that in 2009, two years before The Arab Spring kicked off in Syria, he was asked by British officials to devise a plan to smuggle Jihadis into Syria!!

But since 2011, when the Arab Spring kicked off in Syria, the British government have been supporting the rebels, attending Friends of Syria meetings with the sponsors of the terrorists in Syria, Saudi Arabia, and providing ‘non-lethal’ aid to the rebels.

But by 2013 President Bashar al Assad was still in power. And not only that, in June 2013 the war for Syria turned in Assad’s favour when the Syrian Arab Army recaptured al Qusair. Immediately Prince Bandar bin Sultan of Saudi Arabia was sent to Moscow to personally threaten President Putin: if Putin dumped Assad then Saudi Arabia would buy multi-billion dollars’ worth of weapons from iRussia, and allow Russia to operate in the Middle East; if not then Bandar would unleash hell in Syria and Lebanon. Putin rejected the offer. A week after this visit Bandar’s Jihadis attacked the Hezbollah HQ in Beirut, and on 21st August there was an event alleged to have occurred in Ghouta allegedly resulting in the deaths of hundreds of Syrian civilians. This was a false flag attack designed to provoke an overt large scale military intervention by NATO in support of the international cutthroat Jihadis. The NATO media never mentioned that the rebels had been arrested with chemical weapons, had tested and filmed their experiments with chemical weapons, and had issued threats of using their chemical weapons to get what they wanted.

And it has also been reported and stated, particularly by the head of MI5, that hundreds of Britons are in Syria fighting Jihad against Assad. Indeed, the alleged executioner of James Foley is assumed to be British. To provide a continuous fresh supply of new Jihadis for the aim of bringing down Assad, as stated to General Wesley Clark, MI5 have been allowing extremist Islamic preachers to preach Jihad on the streets and in the mosques of London. One such preacher was Michael Adebalajo, the murderer of Lee Rigby. MI5 were trying to recruit Adebalajo but were allowinghim to preach Jihad against Assad!! MI5 have been doing this kind of thing for decades, leading to London being nicknamed Londonistan.

But all this has now led to the outrageous situation in which:
1. Syria and Iraq are now being overrun by this Islamic State entity, bringing Great Britain to the verge of once again fighting war in Iraq but then very likely also Syria, to kick out Assad as per the plan revealed to Clark;
2 British politicians have now given MI5 and GCHQ more power to intrude into our lives because of this threat of the Islamic State that was manufactured by our ‘intelligence ’ agencies.
One other thing I must mention is that during the 1980s a couple of very similar plans were proposed for Iraq that have been attributed to MI6 analyst Bernard Lewis and Oded Yinon, which involved partitioning Iraq into three mini-states: Sunni, Shia and Kurd.

There are a lot of us out here in ordinary Great Britain who will be watching very, very closely what now happens in Iraq.

I have no idea what MI5 and MI6 are telling you directly or indirectly, but this letter has been written to tell you, as an elected representative of the British people, that MI5 and MI6 are in this throatcutting up to their necks. They are directing it, and are doing it not for the British people but for a cabal in The City of London.

So before we go charging into Iraq again, and at the very least bombing Syria, I must tell you that the British people are not stupid. We were burned in 2003. We learned.

Before we take any further military action in Iraq or Syria and relinquish yet more of our privacy and rights, there must be an inquiry into everything in this letter, particularly:
1. the allegation from Roland Dumas that Great Britain began to plan smuggling cutthroat Jihadis into Syria in 2009;
2. Michael Adebalajo and his ilk being allowed by MI5 to preach Jihad on the streets and in the mosques of Great Britain in order to fuel the terrorism in Syria and Iraq that has led to the creation of the IS, and a general Covenant of Security that was agreed with Islamic extremists that they could operate out of London safe from extradition for terrorism but their operations had to coincide with British foreign policy;
3. what do you, David Cameron, William Hague, Mi5 and MI6 know about the plan agreed in 2007 for Saudi Arabia to unleash international cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria, Lebanon and Iran, and when did you and they know it, and whether this is linked to the allegations of Roland Dumas;

Yours truly

Saturday, August 23, 2014


Yesterday I asked why the ransom for James Foley was not paid while the ransoms for other hostages were, reporting that the broker for the payments was Qatar.

I asked if the decision to not pay the ransom for Foley implied that he was being sacrificed to provide the casus belli for war on Syria.

Today The Guardian has reported that an international treaty forbids payments for hostages.

But as we have seen, other nations have ignored that treaty.

Apparently only the UK and USA have remained committed to that treaty.

All major western countries signed a 2013 G8 commitment not to pay ransom to terrorist groups – an accord reinforced by a UN security council resolution along the same lines in January this year. However, only the US and UK have stuck to that commitment, while other European states – including France, Italy, Spain and Germany – have found ways of channelling money to militant groups in exchange for their citizens.

[source : Terrorist ransoms: should governments pay up or stick to their principles?, The Guardian,, 23rd August 2014]

Yes. The UK and USA are so law abiding and considerate, aren't they?


Foley's ransom could easily have been paid. It would have cost far, far less than any war that will be executed in his name!!

Friday, August 22, 2014


A ransom was asked for James Foley. It was not paid. Ransoms for hostages from nations other than the USA have been paid: Spain; Armenia; France. And apparently Qatar was the broker.

So why was Foley's ransom not paid?

How much will any retribution cost in comparison to the proposed ransom?

According to a June 2014 statement by Treasury undersecretary David S. Cohen, ransom payments are now second only to state sponsorship as a source of revenue for terrorist organizations, implying that kidnapping for profit is ahead of even private contributions, bank robbery, and other forms of fundraising. To be sure, Foley was killed for political and ideological reasons — and possibly to trigger a galvanizing or strategically costly U.S. response. But ISIS also has a recent history of using other foreign prisoners as a means of filling its coffers.

Kidnapping was a crucial early source of funding as ISIS scaled up its operations in 2013, and the group has had some success in ransoming foreign prisoners. It released two Spanish journalists after receiving an undisclosed sum in March of 2014, and there's evidence that ISIS was looking for smaller payoffs, too. In a recent article in the Arabic-language newspaper Al Hayat translated by Al Monitor, a former ISIS prisoner recounted his jailers demanding $100,000 apiece for the freedom of two ethnic Armenians held in a prison in northeastern Syria.

...In April of 2014, a McClatchy report cited anonymous European intelligence agents who claimed the gas-rich Gulf emirate had helped broker the release of ISIS-held foreign hostages on three occasions. The same report said that the agents believe Qatar was the unnamed Persian Gulf country that had helped broker a "sizable payment" that secured the April release of four French journalists whom the group had been holding captive.

Qatar has facilitated payments to a range of terrorist groups, including a $4 million fee that freed 13 nuns from Syrian Jihadist group Jabhat al-Nusra, and a $20.4 million ransom paid with the Omani government to spring four hostages from Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula. Most notably, Qatar helped broker the release of U.S. Army officer Bowe Bergdahl, whom the Taliban had held for nearly five years.

[source : ISIS Has Been Taking Foreign Hostages Since The Very Beginning — And Getting Paid For Them, Business Insider,, 20th August 2014]

This stinks of a provocation.

Was Foley sacrificed to trick Obama into war?

Why would Dodgy Dave urgently return to London from his holiday to discuss the retribution for the execution of one American by an assumed British Jihadi in Syria, when MI5 have been allowing extremist Islamic preachers like Adebalajo to preach Jihad on the streets of London, and he doesn't implement the main recommendations of an inquiry that was set up after Adebelajo murdered Lee Rigby to investigate how to curb the growth of Islamic extremism?

And why was Foley's ransom not paid?

How much did that failed rescue mission cost?



Michael Adebalajo was being harassed by MI5 to become a spy for them, but he apparently refused. But Adebalajo was no ordinary Muslim. While he was under surveillance by MI5 he was preaching Jihad on the streets of London, pleading with young Muslims to go to Syria to wage Jihad against President Bashar al Assad. He was even considering going there himself. But it looks like the harassment from MI5 may have caused Adebalajo to go several steps further than preaching and he murdered Lee Rigby.

One huge question about this is : why would MI5 allow Adebalajo to preach Jihad against Syria?

If the British government was so concerned about terrorism, why would MI5 allow preachers to preach Jihad? And against Syria?

As stated on this blog multiple times:
1. 9/11 was done to provide the casus belli for a series of wars to be waged on seven nations over five years, one of those nations being Syria;
2. but by 2007 that plan was moribund, so Saudi Arabia agreed to unleash cutthroat Jihadis onto Lebanon, Syria and Iran, but they were first unleashed onto Libya, Libya also being one of the seven nations;
3. Great Britain began planning for the insertion of Jihadis into Syria in 2009, 2 years before The Arab Spring kicked off in Syria;
4. but after over 3 years of 'civil' war, in August 2014 Assad is still in power, so the Jihad against Syria requires more and more recruits.

Hence, MI5 was doing what it has done for decades and nurtured Islamic terrorism, by allowing wild and extreme Islamic preachers to preach Jihad against Syria.

But after Adebalajo murdered Lee Rigby there was an inquiry into how to stop Islamic extremism growing.

The inquiry reported its findings to the British government in December last year.

So how many of the inquiry's main recommendations has the British government implemented?

NONE !!!

Ministers faced a storm of criticism last night over the failure to halt the radicalisation of British Muslims amid claims up to 2,000 may have travelled to Iraq and Syria to fight.

Downing Street was forced to admit plans to prevent youths being brainwashed by jihadists, ordered following the horrific murder of Lee Rigby, have been gathering dust for months.

Prime Minister David Cameron set up an ‘extremism taskforce’ after the 25-year-old British soldier was hacked to death by cleaver-wielding fanatics in broad daylight outside Woolwich Barracks, South-east London, in May last year.

But as anger mounted over the beheading of American journalist James Foley by a masked Islamic State militant with an English accent, it emerged none of the group’s main recommendations had been implemented.

[source : Failures that let our young people turn into jihadis: Plans to stop youths being radicalised are gathering dust, The Daily Mail,, 22nd August 2014]

Allowing Islamic extremism to grow provides more recruits for the Jihad against Syria, and it also allows MI5 and GCHQ to call for more surveillance power.



Mario Balotelli should be a Man United player. He is the next Eric.

Either van Gaal can't see it, or he hasn't the man management skills to handle Balotelli.

Either way, if Balotelli signs for Liverpool...

Thursday, August 21, 2014


I would urge you to follow these two particular tweets.

They explain why there has been such secrecy over the video of James Foley allegedly being beheaded while not suggesting that Foley was in on a fake. IMHO Foley was very likely beheaded but not on video. The filming was paused for a while for that, and then his head on his corpse filmed later to form the end of the video. If this is the case then perhaps this John the British Butcher character is not the executioner.

I apologise for any distress, but let's get real. On 9/11 nearly 3000 people were murdered. It was a massive false flag attack, just like Pearl Harbor, designed to provoke calls for global scale war. After 9/11 a series of wars was planned in North Africa and Middle East, but that plan is now way behind schedule, Our allies Saudi Arabia have unleashed cutthroat Jihadis first onto Libya, then Syria, then Iraq, so that we now have this Islamic State entity threatening to slit our throats as we sleep in our beds at night, so that we now need MI5 to intrude into every aspect of our lives to check that either we are not a member of IS or to 'protect' us. We provided military and political support at various times to these terrorists, even allegedly planning the smuggling of the cutthroats into Syria in 2009!

But as that plan for a series of wars falls further and further behind schedule, so does the desperation of the perps. What that relationship is I am not sure: linear; quadratic: cubic: exponential; other nonlinear. I don't know.

But the perps want war.

And will do absolutely anything to get it.


George Galloway has finally revealed the contents of his conversation with the police following complaints that he had suggested that Bradford be made an Israel-free zone. Brief details are on his twitter

Contrary to reports, he was not questioned by police. Galloway claims to have invited them for a conversation where Galloway pointed out that it is not illegal to do what he has done.


Our fathers and grandfathers who fought and died in World War 2 would be so proud of us today. They sacrificed their lives to fight the evil of Nazism. They weren't told that Nazism had actually been created by The City of London and Wall Street. But fight and die they did.

So, as neo Nazis take over Ukraine in a violent NATO-sponsored coup, putting down a rebellion with fighter jets, tanks, indiscriminate artillery, and undoubtedly shooting down a passenger jet MH17 to blame the rebellion, what are the people more interested in?

How do we repay that debt we owe to those whose name liveth for ever more?

Lauren Goodger and Ricci Guarnaccio on 'Celebrity' Big Brother.

CBB have admitted that these two and another couple are in CBB to have sex live on TV.

Our fathers and grandfathers would be so proud.


James Foley was executed, I think. I have not seen any video but that's what we are being told.

James Foley was white.

James Foley was an American.

When he was first reported missing in Syria we were told that the Shabiha had nabbed him and handed him over to the Syrian military. If so, then how did IS get him? Perhaps the first story was true and IS found Foley in a cell. Or the initial story was bullshit.

But Foley was that important that apparently there was a secret mission to find and rescue him by US Special Forces, which failed. What does that suggest about Foley?

But he is also apparently that important that Der Fuhrer, Dodgy Dave Cameron, has urgently returned from his holiday to discuss what to do about Foley's death.

A British Prime Minister urgently returns early from his holiday to discuss what to do about the death of one white American.

What the f@#&?!

Contrast this response to that to the deaths of over 2000 Palestinians by God's Chosen People, Israel, after the Devil himself, Benjamin Netanyahu, engineered a 'war'. According to the latest figures released by Gaza Ministry of Health, Israel has killed 553, repeat 553, children. Some of them died just yesterday. Brown Moses might be able to find a few pictures of dead Palestinian children on social media if we ask him nicely.

553 children.


Blown to bits.

Some decapitated by only God and Israel know what kind of hellish weapons they are testing.

Yet what did Cameron and his Cabinet do? FUCK ALL!!

Baroness Warsi eventually resigned, but she took her time about it. She was praised by Owen Jones, but he still writes for the now blatant bona fide Zionist The Guardian.

And in addition, the UK has reneged on its recent statement about supplying weapons to Israel!!

So, that is how this country works.

One decapitated white American and the British Prime Minister urgently returns from his holiday to discuss retribution.

Five hundred and fifty three dead Palestinian children, all killed by Israel, and not a peep.

And let's not forget East Ukraine while we're at it.

Ukraine was recently taken over by bona fide neo Nazis, with the assistance of over $5 billion from the USA alone, whose supporters chased anti-putsch protestors into a building and burned them alive, shot at those trying to jump from third floor windows and beat to death those who survived the jump. The neo Nazis are now bombarding civilian areas of East Ukraine with inaccurate indiscriminate weapons. And all the evidence points to Kiev shooting down MH17. Over 2000 are now dead in East Ukraine. Bodies lie rotting and unrecovered in the streets.

Neo Nazis murdering civilians and not a peep from Downing Street.


Obviously, despite Cameron's statements about no boots on the ground in Iraq, the establishment does indeed want boots on the ground in Iraq. They are there already actually. The SAS are there. And they are a law unto themselves and Buckingham Palace. SO God knows what they are up to.

I still can't see whether Iraq is being partitioned or this is all just a way to eventually get at Assad. They did 9/11 to replace people like Assad. He should have been replaced years ago, according to their initial schedule. But nearly 13 years after 9/11 and he is still there, and looks like he is there to stay for a long time yet, particularly while Putin runs Russia. Hence the war on Putin.

Wednesday, August 20, 2014


Whitney Houston, Luther Vandross, Dionne Warwick, Stevie Wonder LIVE - Thats What Friends Are For



My Springer puppy has been possessed by a puppy demon.

Despite hours of walking and socialising, she is possessed!! A devil dog!! Wrecking. Chewing. Scratching.

I've bred Springers before but this one is something else.

Heavenly Father. Save this puppy from possession by Benjamin Netanyahu. Deliver her from pure evil. Amen.


George Galloway has been questioned by police about his remarks on making Bradford an Israel-free zone. Galloway has not attacked, harmed or killed anyone. He merely suggested that Bradford be made an Israel-free zone. Yet he is questioned by the police.

Meanwhile Israel, during the last four weeks or so, has killed approximately 2000 Palestinians, most of whom were civilians, a lot of whom were children, and reduced their homes and schools to uninhabitable rubble. This 'war' was engineered by the Devil himself, Benjamin Netanyahu. Three Israeli teenagers were kidnapped and killed. Their bodies were found in The West Bank, which is ruled by Abbas and Fatah, not Hamas. In addition, a splinter of ISIS claimed responsibility. But Netanyahu blamed Hamas. So a 'war' on Gaza ensued, leading to the deaths of approximately 2000 Palestinians living in The Gaza Strip, while the vast majority of dead Israelis were members of the IDF after a ground invasion of The Gaza Strip.

But is Israel being questioned by the police over all this engineered carnage, death and destruction? Er, nope.

There are cries for Israel to be brought before the International Criminal Court. But will this ever happen?

It can happen.

It will happen.

Judgement Day for Israel is nigh.


Africa is doing some deals with China, while Russia is making deals and building a good name for itself in South America and the Middle East (except Israel).

This strain of Ebola appears to be not normal, possibly engineered.

What if the USA has developed and released this strain of Ebola to cause a crisis as a threat to Africa: if the USA, or NATO ally, can provide the 'cure' then is Africa more likely to befriend the USA/NATO or China?

Just a wild and wacky thought after a cup of tea.

Tuesday, August 19, 2014


For all my friends, this is for you.

For all not my friends, well...

Andrew Gold - Thank You For Being A Friend


Two lectures by Webster Tarpley to watch and think seriously about.

The Men Behind President Obama

"Pearl Harbor Revisited" lecture by Webster G. Tarpley 2007


Two reports in The Daily Mail today are linked by a dare.

The first is, oh dear, not again, yet another female teacher seducing a much younger male student. Apparently two boys went round to their teacher's house on a dare, and, well, you can guess what happens next...

A 32-year-old middle school teacher has been accused of raping a 13-year-old boy after he accepted a 'dare' to contact her and visit her home.

Mary Faith McCormick, a married mother-of-one, was arrested after one of the boy's friends allegedly found semi-nude photos of the teacher on the boy's phone.

Police then carried out an investigation and allegedly uncovered the three-month affair between the teacher and the underage boy.

[source : Married middle school teacher, 32, 'had sex with boy, 13, after he accepted a "dare" to contact her and visit her home', The Daily Mail,, 19th August 2014]

Well. What can I say?

But the second story is by far the more important, and concerns MH17.

You remember MH17, don't you? I think I remember reading something about it in the NATO media, but have heard nothing for weeks. Apparently Russia and/or pro-Russia separatists in Ukraine shot down MH17 with a BUK. That's what it said in the NATO media, so it must be true. After all, they told us Iraq did 9/11 and had WMDs, and that was tr...



That was all bullshit, all that stuff about Iraq and 9/11 and WMDs.

The US State Department said the proof regarding MH17 was on social media. And if Brown Moses is on the case, then I suppose it must still be true. After all, he has still not proved Assad did Ghouta (and he never will).

Ignore the geopolitics for now and for ever more.

Ignore the fact that NATO has reneged on a promise to Russia to not expand, but expand is all it has done, from Checkpoint Charlie to now using bona fide neo Nazis in Ukraine in a violent coup sponsored by the USA with over $5 billion, to eventually bring NATO right to the borders of Russia and Ukraine under IMF control.

Ignore the fact that President Putin is opposing the NATO international cutthroat Jihadis in Syria and supporting President Assad.

Ignore the fact that President Putin is the driving force for an alternative to the bloodsucking IMF/Wall Street/City of London leeches who have sucked the life out of many nation states for decades and kept them underdeveloped.

If Brown Moses finds a video showing a BUK then Russia shot MH17 down.

I'm convinced.

Case closed.

Or is it?

When Russia released radar evidence that MH17 was followed by another smaller aircraft, assumed to be a fighter, MH17 disappeared from the NATO media headlines faster than allegations of paedos in Whitehall (while The Snowden Revelations were still being published). Over a month later we still have not heard or read transcripts of communications of Ukraine Air Traffic Controllers on the day. This has now been raised at the UN Security Council by Russia.

Russia has accused Ukrainian air-traffic control of sending Malaysian Airlines flight MH17 into the conflict zone where it was shot down last month.

The Russian envoy to the UN Security Council has demanded Kiev release all records of its air-traffic controllers' communications with the plane, whose downing is the subject of a major diplomat crisis.

The passenger jet carrying 298 people was hit by a missile the Ukrainian government and its allies say was fired from the rebel-held Donetsk region in eastern Ukraine on July 17.

Russia says there is a lack of proof for this claim and expressed concerns at the UN Security Council over Kiev's refusal to release transcripts of conversations its air traffic controllers had with MH17.

'Nothing is known about the record of talks between Ukrainian flight controllers,' said Russian envoy to the UN, Vitaly Churkin .

'They should produce the records of talks between their flight controllers so that it would be possible to understand why they directed the Malaysian plane into the conflict zone.

[source : Ukrainian air-traffic control sent doomed flight MH17 over the conflict zone in Donetsk region, says Russia, The Daily Mail,, 19th August 2014]

This reports assumes that MH17 was shot down by a missile. We don't even know that. OSCE observers suggest it was shot down by cannon fire. There is a lot that we don't know about MH17. But Ukraine could help by releasing the records of their ATCs from that day.

One comment on The Daily Mail on this story reads:
Always thought it was the Ukraine trying to pin it on the Russians. Prove us all wrong by releasing the recordings. I dare u

But the question I have is this : will Brown Moses find evidence of WMDs in Iraq on social media?


What are friends for?

Whitney Houston, Luther Vandross, Dionne Warwick, Stevie Wonder LIVE - Thats What Friends Are For

Unfortunately, Houston had a problem.

Masters of Rhythm - La Coca - Rhythm Master Dub Mix


Regarding World War 1, Stop The War pushes the it-was-going-to-happen-anyway theory. But there is abundant evidence to counter, if not destroy, that theory, as I have been stating time after time after time. That evidence very strongly suggests that World War 1 was a conspiracy that was engineered to destroy nation states, who were cooperating to replace the Brutish Confederate-loving slave-trading Empire, and replace them with a world government under British control. The plan almost worked, but because the USA did not lose that many lives in comparison, it voted to stay out of the League of Nations, which was ultimately doomed by this rejection. So in order to create a world government that the USA would join, a second world war was required, one which the USA would need to fight in from the start and thus suffer many, many more casualties and be 'persuaded' that a world government was required to stop future wars.

So the thought for the day is : by pushing the it-was-going-to-happen-anyway theory, is Stop The War actually protecting the real culprits of World War 1 (and WW2), thus allowing the culprits to engineer and manipulate current and future wars?


Last week the Ukraine government claimed to have destroyed a convoy of Russian military vehicles on Ukrainian territory. As yet, no photographic evidence has been provided. They, and the US State Dept, are waiting for Brown Moses to find the evidence on social media.


The Guardian printed a highly controversial advert last week, which accused Hamas for the deaths in the Gaza Strip because it is alleged (by Zionist organisations) that Hamas uses the civilians of Gaza as human shields. The readers editor of The Guardian has now published his view on this:
Each advertisement has clearly got to be decided on a case-by-case basis, bearing in mind not just specific criteria but the context of the times as well. I entirely support the argument that freedom of expression means the freedom to offend. On that basis I don’t think it was wrong to run an advertisement that expressed a viewpoint, with which the Guardian has no sympathy, about the alleged use of human shields by Hamas, which the organisation has strenuously denied. But there are always limits.

I think the Guardian should have rejected the language of the advertisement and attempted to negotiate change with the authors, something they indicated to the Times that they might consider.

I agree with the readers that whatever the intention, the biblical language, the references to child sacrifice, all evoke images of that most ancient of antisemitic tropes: the blood libel. The authors may believe that they have steered a careful course by aiming these matters at an organisation, Hamas, rather than all Palestinians, but the association is there. If an advertisement was couched in similar terms but the organisation named was the IDF rather than Hamas, I can’t imagine the Guardian would run it – I certainly hope it wouldn’t. I think that’s the issue.

[source : The readers’ editor on... the decision to run This World’s advertisement, The Guardian,, 18th August 2014]

So in his opinion:
1. a less provocative advert should have been printed;
2. if the IDF were being accused then the advert would not have been printed!!

This is a very damning statement, and indicates that there is a some recognition inside The Guardian that The Guardian is Zionist.

But Owen Jones or Seamus Milne have not written something so critical of The Guardian itself.


Chris Elliott has shown the way.

Monday, August 18, 2014


I have repeatedly pointed out that World War 1 was a plan of the British Empire to stop the emergence of a new League of Cambrai in which the USA, Germany, France and Russia all cooperated to replace the free trade of the slave-trading Brutish Empire. The British Empire used their agents in Freemasonry to engineer the assassination of Arch Duke Ferdinand, and then tricked and manipulated Europe into war, first promising Germany that Great Britain would stay out of any war, thus encouraging mobilisation by the other European powers, but then ordering Sir Edward Grey to get Great Britain into the war, which he did by citing the 1839 Treaty of London, which Great Britain had no legal obligation to enforce unilaterally.

The idea that the war was going to happen anyway is pushed by the Stop The War Coalition through Neil Faulkner's pamphlet on WW1, available at

Faulkner was interviewed by Tony Gosling a few weeks ago, and Faulkner pushed the same theory ad nauseum, But Gosling has also recently interviewed Webster Tarpley on this, and that interview is being curiously released in weekly segments rather than in one full-on in-your-face mind-blowing session.

This it-was-going-to-happen theory is due to Marxists.

But who was Karl Marx?

Marx was a British agent, first unwitting through Engels (see Treason in America), but then witting through his association with David Urquhart (see all over the place if you can be bothered, in particular on where you can see Marx 'warm' to Urquhart, then see elsewhere for how Urquhart came to be what he was).

At the moment Stop The War is not good at stopping wars.

It didn't stop the recent war on Gaza, because it didn't see it coming. But I did.

It claims to have stopped the war on Syria last year. But that was after Ghouta. Stop The War didn't predict Ghouta. But I did.

I have been on and on and on and on and on and on about WW1 being engineered by the British monarchy using Freemasonry. I proposed a protest outside Freemasons Hall on 28th June to recognise the role that Freemasonry played in engineering WW1. Stop The War didn't turn up. But I did.

As with MI5, there must be a cleaning out of Stop The War, from top to bottom.


There is some doubt about el Sisi of Egypt.

The Muslim Brotherhood were the choice of the NATO establishment. The NATO media loved the MB.

El Sisi kicked them out, and charged hundreds of them with terrorism.

But it also came out that Saudi Arabia had promised to provide $4 billion to Egypt if el Sis kicked the MB out. Why would the centre of international cutthroat Jihadism do this? Saudi Arabia considered the MB a threat to their unique brand of Jihad.

But at the same time there were reports that Egypt under the MB were about to join the 'war' in Syria on the side of the cutthroats.

But despite all this, Webster Tarpley came out firmly in favour of el Sisi, calling him a new Nasser.

Now LPAC have come out firmly in favour in favour el Sisi, in two articles:
Egyptian President Declares Support for Crucial Toshka Mega-Agricultural Project

New Suez Canal Project Recalls Nasser and the Aswan Dam

So, economically he may be drifting towards the BRICS, but:
1. he employs Blair as an advisor;
2. he didn't exactly shine during the most recent Israel shooting-fish-in-a-barrel war on the Gaza strip.

Perhaps el Sisi is playing both sides at the moment, testing the wind. The last few years in Egypt have been turmoil and chaos, and Egyptian leaders have lost their leaderships too easily.

I would be happier if he didn''t employ Blair, and he supported The Gaza Strip more, despite Hamas' government.


Fucking shit!

One big let down after another.

Full of people who would rather fight and fuck than find out what's really going on and do something about it.


We were told that IS had surrounded over 40,000 Yazidis who had been chased onto the summit of a remote mountain. IS was threatening a massacre, we were told. So Cameron sent bombers and the SAS to Iraq without consulting The Marsten House on a R2P mission.

But it turns out that those Yazidis actually live on that mountain, and their number was more like 1000, not 40000.

But why bring the bombers and SAS back?

Why not keep them there...and scare the shit out of us.

Why not now use the threat of IS itself? IS, that entity manufactured in London, Washington, Tel Aviv and Riyadh. IS is preparing to slit our throats as we sleep in our beds, warned Cameron, unless we bomb, bomb, bomb them.

This time last year the final preparations for the false flag of Ghouta were being made. That event was designed to provoke an overt large scale military intervention in Syria on behalf of the international cutthroat Jihadis, who were starting to lose the 'war' badly. They were eventually chased into Iraq, and formed IS. The Iraqi Army were told to stand down to allow the Jihadis to invade Iraq and seize military hardware, natural resources and bank accounts.

Now, there are several possibilities as to why Cameron, under orders himself, would want to embroil the UK in Iraq again:
1. to partition Iraq into 3 states, Kurdish, Sunni and Shia, as per the Bernard Lewis/Yinon plans;
2. now that pro-Iran Maliki has been replaced, to drive IS into Syria and start some mischief there to eventually bring down Assad through skulduggery.

Regarding 2., it is significant that the rebels in Syria have asked for airstrikes in Syria to protect them from IS.

I am not sure yet which way this is going to go. Either path 1 or 2 above.

But that this is all occuring right now, while everyone is away on holiday and unable or unwilling to return to The Marsten House to discuss why we are on a mission creep in Iraq, is not a coincidence.

We are talking about Dodgy Dave here.

Dodgy Dave, bona fide representative of the bona fide Fascist City of London.

Sunday, August 17, 2014


Dodgy David Cameron, Der Fuhrer, has written in The Sunday Telegraph that the Islamic State is a threat to Great Britain and must be stopped by war. But he adds
So this threat cannot simply be removed by airstrikes alone. We need a tough, intelligent and patient long-term approach that can defeat the terrorist threat at source.

[source : David Cameron: Isil poses a direct and deadly threat to Britain, Sunday Telegraph,, 16th August 2014]

The use of cutthroat Jihadis was proposed in The Redirection in 2007. The USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia agreed that the latter would unleash cutthroat Jihadis to take out several governments. Those governments were named to General Wesley Clark shortly after 9/11 as members of a list of seven nations to be attacked over five years. Four of those nations were Iraq, Iran, Syria and Lebanon and had been named in A Clean Break. Iraq and Iran had also been named in Rebuilding America's Defenses, with Iran considered a bigger threat to US national security than Iraq. The other 3 nations named to Clark were Sudan, Somalia and Libya.

After 9/11 there was an invasion of Iraq in 2003.

In 2006 Israel engineered a war on Hezbollah, but lost.

So by 2007 the plan revealed to Clark was moribund. So this plan to unleash cutthroat Jihadis onto some of the nations named to Clark, particularly Syria, Iran and Lebanon, was devised to keep the main plan alive, which was to replace the governments and/or partition them as per The Bernard Lewis/Yinon Plans.

The Jihadis were first unleashed onto Libya, ably assisted by British Special Forces and NATO, with finance from Qatar and Saudi Arabia. After Gaddafi was assassinated the Jihadis and the looted arsenal of the Libyan military were transported to Syria. But the competent Syrian Arab Army, despite initial losses has regained supremacy. To keep the Jihad against Assad going needs recruits, so MI5 allowed, as they have done for decades, preachers such as the murderer of Lee Rigby, Michael Adebalajo to preach Jihad on the streets and in the mosques of London. When agents such as Reda Hassaine were finding out information on the Jihad, MI5 betrayed him. They do this because terrorism fulfills British foreign policy.

Both Israel and Saudi Arabia were created by Great Britain. There is an argument that the United States was also created by Great Britain, but at the least it has been hijacked by anglophiles in Wall Street so that it generally serves British foreign policy by providing finance and military muscle.

The Islamic State is due to this policy of unleashing cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria, and MI5 allowing preachers to encourage British muslims to either join or otherwise support the Jihad. Other Commonwealth nations and nations loyal to The Crown have been doing the same

But at the same time, MI5 have been using this manufactured threat of ISIS/ISIL/IS to push for more surveillance power, which they were recently sneakily and foolishly given.

As an example of the interface between the USA and the Islamic State, let us look at Abdul Jabbar Okaidi.

In May 2013 the banished US Ambassador to Syria Robert "Death Squad" Ford met with Okaidi. I commented on this meeting (see CAR BOMBS IN REYHANLI JUST DAYS AFTER ROBERT FORD SECRETLY VISITED THE AREA ) because shortly after Ford left there was a terrorist attack inside Turkey, just over the border from where the meeting took place. It seems that where Ford goes terrorism is not far behind.

But who is Okaidi?

Watch this video.

The video begins with Robert "Death Squad" Ford, personally appointed by Obama, meeting with Okaidi, who then goes onto praise all the terrorists that Cameron warns us about!!

So if Cameron wants to "defeat the terrorist threat at source", then I suggest the following alternative very simple but very powerful war-free 2 point plan, a plan that will lead to the defeat of terrorism everywhere, because it addresses the true source of terrorism:
1. clean out MI5, from top to bottom, and replace the agents and employees currently loyal to this Disunited Fascist Queendom and The City of London with agents and employees loyal to the people of the United Kingdom (there is a very subtle but fundamental difference);
2. cease all contact with Israel, Saudi Arabia and Qatar, place eye-watering sanctions on these nations (not Russia) and seize assets in London and British territories of these 3 nations as suspected for use in terrorism.


So Ladies and Gentlemen, please stand as we sing our new national anthem, in honour of our new cutthroat Jihadi allies:

God save our gracious queen
Long live our noble queen
Allah u Akbar!

Send her victorious
Happy and glorious
Long to reign over us
Allah u Akbar!

Saturday, August 16, 2014


Been looking for these for decades.

(1995) Global Mind feat. Desy Moore - In The Heat [Gino Woody Bianchi Edit Mix]

Marcus Life - Life Will Make You Dance (Bonzai's Club Mix)

The Absolute - I Believe - Mark's Full On Gospel Mix 1996. (HD).


d*note - the garden of earthly delights

Friday, August 15, 2014



A few weeks ago The Guardian was attacking Putin and Russia, naming them "the newest rogue state", "brutish Russia" and "brutish Putin". However, this was at a time when the latest shooting-fish-in-a-barrel slaughter in The Gaza Strip was beginning to reach its peak, with over 1500 Palestinians killed by Israel, most of whom were civilians, while less than 60 Israelis had been killed, most of whom were IDF during the ground invasion of Gaza.

I questioned why The Guardian did not refer to Israel as "brutish Israel". Israel has now killed slightly short of 2000 Palestinians, whereas Russia has not killed anyone. Yes, there are allegations that Russia directly or indirectly shot down MH17, but the evidence points to Ukraine (or someone else) shooting that down, no matter how much time Brown Moses spends on watching videos. He was wrong on Ghouta. He is wrong on MH17. He has to ask himself why The Guardian would support Israel and neo Nazis in Ukraine but also sponsor him. Owen Jones and Seamus Milne also need to ask them selves a few questions.

But as with Israel, Ukraine has now killed over 2000 in East Ukraine. Yet where are the cries of "brutish Ukraine!" in the NATO media? You will not find them. Because what has happened in Ukraine is a violent NATO-sponsored neo-Nazi coup. The PM Yatseniuk runs a foundation sponsored by NATO, and many members of the putsch are members of neo Nazi parties. They seized power by burning government buldings, beating and murdering policemen and chasing the legal government away. Their supporters were confident enough to chase anti-putschists into a building in Odessa and burn them alive, shoot at them as they tried to jump from third floor windows to escape the flames, and beat to death those who survived the jump. This is what we are dealing with in Ukraine. There is nothing romantic about it, as Luke Harding of The Guardian would have you believe. This is hard core geopolitics using neo Nazis to eventually NATO-ise Ukraine and put NATO's nuclear missiles on the border between Ukraine and Russia, threatening WW3.

But it is also curious that Stop The War has been focusing on Gaza while ignoring Ukraine. I suppose this is sort of understandable. Israel has placed Gaza under illegal blockade for years, and regularly 'mows the lawn'.

But the death toll in East Ukraine has now passed that in Gaza (though there are probably more corpses to be found in the rubble in the next few months). And this latest ceasefire looks like it could last for now.

Thursday, August 14, 2014



In June 2012, after a concert for Liz's Golden Jubilee, I commented on Cliff Richard's curious choice of play list for that night:


Cliff Richard has had a very successful career spanning decades.

But of all the songs he could have performed, this one stood out the most; Devil Woman.

Was this a personal request?

She is a devil woman
With evil on her mind
She is a devil woman
She's gonna get you.


In June 2013 two of the NATO establishment newspapers, The Washington Post and The Guardian, began to publish a series of 'leaks' by a former employee of the NSA, Ed Snowden.

The Washington Post is the megaphone of Bilderberg.

The Guardian is a key and integral member of the NATO media, pushing the pro-Israel, anti-Russia propaganda dressed as R2P, using writers such as Owen Jones and Seamus Milne to give the newspaper some kind of lefty/caring cover (though whether they are aware of this I am not sure).

So we have to ask, why would newspapers such as these first publish the 'leaks', which were then reprinted in other newspapers, also members of the NATO establishment?

Well, one answer is that 'they' wanted you to know that you were being spied on.

But how could 'they' know the 'leaks' were about to break?

Either Snowden is wittingly part of an operation, or Snowden is a genuine whistleblower but 'they' knew due to other information they had.

I have never met him but Snowden seems genuine enough. He does seem to have had a Road to Damascus moment. He may be a bit naive, in that he still believes that al Qaeda did 9/11 without any kind of establishment assistance, and he believed the lies of Rumsfeld and Cheney about 9/11 so much that he signed up to go to Iraq and kill Iraqis.

So, if Snowden is genuine, then how could 'they' know?


Snowden now claims that he left clues for the NSA.
He says that he actually intended the government to have a good idea about what exactly he stole. Before he made off with the documents, he tried to leave a trail of digital bread crumbs so investigators could determine which documents he copied and took and which he just “touched.” That way, he hoped, the agency would see that his motive was whistle-blowing and not spying for a foreign government. It would also give the government time to prepare for leaks in the future, allowing it to change code words, revise operational plans, and take other steps to mitigate damage. But he believes the NSA’s audit missed those clues and simply reported the total number of documents he touched—1.7 million. (Snowden says he actually took far fewer.) “I figured they would have a hard time,” he says. “I didn’t figure they would be completely incapable.”

[source : James Bamford, The Most Wanted Man in the World, Wired,]

And here is where we can now sreiously question Snowden's naivete, because he clearly believes that 'they' did not know, and that 'they' are "completely incapable".

Completely incapable. eh?

What has happened since the 'leaks' were, and still are, so spectacularly published on the front pages of the megaphone of Bilderberg, The Washington Post, and the NATO media flag ship The Guardian?
1. who has gone to jail? NOBODY!
2. how have laws changed? What was illegal is now legal and in some cases the NSA and now GCHQ have more power.
3. how many large scale, global protests have there been over this outrageous spying? Not that many, if any, and that is from around the world.

But the rise and rise of al Qaeda in Syria, and then Iraq, and then ISIS and then IS, together with alleged threats of ISIS slitting our throats as we slept in our beds at night, have been pushed and stated in The Marsten House as reasons why the likes of the NSA and GCHQ were only dong their job and should be given more powers to spy on us in order to 'protect' us.

This interview of Snowden has plugged a hole I was looking to fill: if Snowden was genuine then how could 'they' have known?

Well we now know: he virtually told them!

So a question to ask is: why would the NATO media have published and continue to publish The Snowden Revelations on their front pages, and in the case of Russia Today dedicate days to Snowden, yet none of them publish The Clark Revelations about the plan for totaler krieg on seven nations in five years after 9/11?

Answer : Because they want you to know.

And it has worked. There have not been any large scale protests about such intrusive surveillance. In fact, the people are thankful for it because of the threat of al Qaeda in Syria and Iraq, which is itself a manufactured threat due to MI5 allowing the likes of Michael Adebalajo to preach Jihad on the streets of London to persuade British Jihadis to go to Syria and train and fight alongside al Qaeda in Syria. Those Jihadis are now apparently writing on Ask trying to persuade more British Jihadis, women too, to join IS!!


ps this also explains why the likes of Alex Jones, David Icke, Webster Tarpley, Lyndon Larouche, Tony Gosling, etc are rarely mentioned in the NATO media, and when they are then it is only briefly and to be ridiculed.

Monday, August 11, 2014


You've got to like house to appreciate this.

ALCATRAZ - Give Me Luv (Original mix)


Here is some advice I should have given myself a few years ago: don't hold back the feeling!

Blender - Back The Feeling (Funky Live Edit)


VOLCANO - Let Your Body Be Free


Piano classic house mash up by Davos

A S H A - J.J. Tribute (Original 1990 Version)


Now then.

How can anyone who spoke on Saturday write on or for The Guardian, particularly after so many signatures for the Stop The War letter?

Sunday, August 10, 2014


Get your sick bags ready!!


Richard Herring: how I ra-ra-rescued Rasputin from myth and falsehood

Rasputin was not the philanderer he was made out to be. There is no way that he could have been shagging every royal Russian female. This was just a lie manufactured by the assassins.

And yes, assassins plural.

Because Yusupov was not alone when Rasputin was assassinated.

The truth about Rasputin is this:
1. he was anti-war and was trying to persuade Tsar Nicholas II to pull out of WW1, and had the power to convince Nicholas to do this;
2. Yusupov was part of an Anglophile network in Russia;
3. British/Freemasonry/Jews had been trying to overthrow the Russian monarchy for over a century but each time had failed.
(a) Even though the Tsar was a Freemason he banned Freemasonry because of its revolutionary activities
(b) After this ban there was relative stability in Russia until Alexander II decided to help Abraham Lincoln to defeat the British-allied Confederacy in the British-engineered US Civil War
(c) After 1864 there was a series of failed attempts at assassinating Tsars, all traced back to London
(d) Anglophile Jewish bankers and their agents financed Japan against Russia in 1904/5 and then tried to use the defeat of Russia as a casus belli for revolution, but Schiff agent George Kennan failed and Trotsky and Lenin were exiled.

But after 3 years of fighting in WW1 the Russian people were not revolutionary but disgruntled enough to not oppose the rantings of German agent Lenin, who was assisted by British agent Trotsky (for what other reason would the British release Trotsky at Halifax to take Russia out of the war?), both of whom were financed by Germany and Jacob Schiff, and after a century the British finally got rid of the Romanovs in 1917.

I know this all sounds a bit mad, but you have to understand the international network of the Warburgs and their friends, who due to their nationalities were supposed to be at war with each other, but were instead actually very close, sending their sons to be trained in each others banking houses!!

But back to Rasputin.

Rasputin had the power to persuade Nicholas II to withdraw from WW1. If Russia had withdrew in 1916 then the Schiff-financed revolutions of 1917 would not have occured.

So Rasputin had to be taken out.

And he was.

But Yusupov was not alone. He was ably assisted by British agents Oswald Rayner and John Scales.

Thus the British/Freemasonry/Jews achieved their centuries-long quest.

It would be interesting to know beforehand if Herring mentions Rayner and Scales,

Because if he doesn't then I shall be taking a big bag of rotten tomatoes!!


But then again, I don't write for The Guardian.

Because I have been calling it out for what it is.

"Liberal" Guardian to print pro-genocide ad