Tuesday, April 28, 2015


Right. That's me done for now.


Just watched a report on RT about Varoufakis being replaced as negotiator with Greece's creditors. One brief scene showed a protestor holding a placard with the succinct demand, "UNFUCK GREECE".


Watch this.

This is why I refer to the junta in Ukraine as The Kiev Nazis (who have been beatified and protected by the NATO media because NATO wants Ukraine as a member in order to plonk first strike nuclear missiles aimed at Moscow on Russia's doorstep).

Nazism in Ukraine. 10 symptoms

Monday, April 27, 2015


Forget The London Bus, Beefeaters, the black London Cabs driven by cabbies with "the knowledge", the changing of the guard, etc, etc, etc.

Forget all that bollocks.

Which of these horrific crimes against humanity is the British Royal family most guilty of:
1. kiddie-fiddling and child murder;
2. Engineering World War One?

Watch these two docs:
Savile and the 9th Circle

Sun, Sea and Satan - Pie N Mash Films

But then ask yourself:
1. which of these two needs exposing first, taking into account ease or swiftness of being able to be proven in court?
2. is any of this kind of horrific shit occuring in Russia?

WW1 was truly horrific and involved millions of deaths and casualties over 4 years, while kiddie-fiddling and kiddie-murder is even more horrific but has occured on a much smaller scale than WW1.

This is what we really sing about when we sing the national anthem when England FC beat San Marino 6-0: that we thank them for WW1 and kiddie-fiddling and kiddie-murder.

It is truly head-shakingly diabolical.


If you send someone several reports about the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, believing (and trusting) that they could and would want to help, but despite 2 years of writing, asking, and pleading, and begging that they help and you don't hear a peep from them, not even one single question, what do you think would happen if I asked again?

Can you see a bleedin' obvious pattern?

I ask and ask and ask and get nothing, despite (sort of) predicting Ghouta, predicting Israel's barbaric war on Gaza, and standing like the complete humiliated fool outside Freemasons Hall on the 100th anniversary of the Freemasonic assassination of Arch Duke Ferdinand?

Should I give it another try?

Is it worth asking one more time?

Or not bother ever, ever again, recognising the bleedin' obvious pattern of ignorance?


Can the origins of WW1 be found here?

The Papers of Viscount Esher (Reginald Brett)

"One Wintry Afternoon in February 1891, three men were engaged in earnest conversation in London. From that conversation were to flow consequences of the greatest importance to the British Empire and to the world as a whole. For these men were organizing a secret society that was, for more than fifty years, to be one of the most important forces in the formulation and execution of British imperial and foreign policy.

The three men who were thus engaged were already well known in England. The leader was Cecil Rhodes, fabulously wealthy empire builder and the most important person in South Africa. The second was William T. Stead, the famous, and probably also the most sensational, journalist of the day. The third was Reginald Baliol Brett, later known as Lord Esher, friend and confidant of Queen Victoria, and later to be the most influential advisor of King Edward VII and King George V.

[source : The Anglo-American Establishment, Carroll Quigley]

So Esher was the link between the Monarchy and everything else in the power structure, and met the king daily for discussion, and according to Quigley he was "the most influential advisor of King Edward VII and King George V." Edward VII had Esher reform the British Army (in preparation for WW1?).

We know that:
1. as Grand Master of the United Grand Lodge of England, Prince Edward began to diplomatically isolate Germany;
2. King George V told Germany that Great Britain would not join any war while telling Sir Edward Grey to get Great Britain into any war that occured.

So if Esher was their most influential advisor, I'm wondering if Esher is the mastermind or just the fixer, the "Yes" man.


Because they won't shut up about what has really happened in Ukraine: Coup! Coup! Coup!



Cameron is on the rampage!

Lock up your pigeons!

David Cameron today tore up his ultra-cautious campaign plan and insisted the countdown to the election 'pumps me up'.

After weeks of criticism that the Conservatives were running a boring campaign, the Prime Minister found the fire in his belly as he declared: 'If I'm getting lively about it it's because I feel bloody lively about it.'

[source : Has Cameron FINALLY found his fire? Pumped-up PM says he feels 'bloody lively' as he tells Tories to 'get out there and fight', Daily Mail, http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3057323/David-Cameron-tells-Tories-fight.html, 27th April 2015]

If you don't know what I'm on about read > this < and weep.

Yes. We could once again be governed by someone who, at our expense, uses armed police to seal off a wood so that he can shoot pigeons dead in secret.

No wonder he supports international cutthroat Jihadis in Syria and neo-Nazis in Ukraine!!


How does Das Erste report events in Syria? I need to look into that. But as the acknowledged government's broadcaster Das Erste will be controlled, much as RT and the BBC are.

But regarding this MH17 'documentary':

1. It was aimed at a German audience with an anti-Russia agenda. Whenever the 'documentary' showed stuff from Moscow, what music did they play in the background? Music from The Bourne Supremacy in which the plot in the film is that a dodgy Russian has people shot in Berlin and a Russian assassin is trying to hunt Bourne down. And when the 'journalists' approach a separatist checkpoint the music becomes very sinister;
2. Two men somewhere in an unnamed village with their faces covered seem to talk about a missile. Contrast that with the 8, repeat 8, people who have clearly stated on camera, faces open for all to be recognised and identified, that they say saw a fighter jet close to MH17, and Pyotr Fedotov who Reuters claimed had told them that he saw a missile launched from separatist territory but who then told RT on camera that he had not and the Reuters had made it up. Did Das Erste bother to hunt down these witnesses?;
3. Higgins seems to be the main source of information. And yes, that's the same Higgins who is in cahoots with The Atlantic Council, USAID and George Soros. And yes, that's the same Atlantic Council which has the dude running Reuters as a board member;
4. The 'documentary' showed Voloshin but we need a good translation of what he was asked and what he replied with;
5. Where was the field the documentary believed the missile was shot from? Not very clear at all where that was. Before the film of that field the locations of the sightings of a BUK were clearly shown, but for whatever reason the location of that field was not. Why was that?
6. The 'documentary' showed the SU25 reaching well over its supposed maximum operating altitude, so there should be no doubt that a SU25 can fly well over its ADVISED maximum operating altitude;
7. Good questions were being raised about why the skies over East Ukraine were still open to civilian air traffic on 17th July 2014;
8. The film of the BUK with a missing missile was shown several times, but this was supplied by the untrustworthy Ukraine Security Service who said to the whole world that intercepted recordings proved 100% beyond doubt that Cossacks at Chernukino shot down MH17 while the 'documentary' was suggesting that some unidentified field near Shnizhne was the launch point (the 'documentary' didn't point this contradiction out);
9. Ray McGovern was shown briefly raising the crucial point that the 'official' American assessment was from the US State Department not from the US intelligence community.

MH17 was shot down while there was a massive NATO electronic warfare exercise going on. During this exercise civilian air traffic control was affected to a dangerous level. That NATO exercise proved that radar can be spoofed into seeing things that aren't there and not seeing things that are, i.e. a military plane can be seen on radar as a civilian plane, but more crucially on radar a civilian plane can be made to look like a military plane but a military plane must be somewhere near that civilian plane.

Shrapnel from the pilots corpses would tell us a lot, but for whatever reason their autopsy reports are being withheld from the public.


Freedom can be free...if you let or make others do all the work for you, as in slavery.

But when we have Ed "Fuck Yeah" Miliband pushing the Henry Jackson Neocon wars at Chatham House then we are in big, big trouble!!

What would you do
If you were asked to give up your dreams for freedom?
What would you do
If asked to make the ultimate sacrifice?

Would you think about all them people
Who gave up everything they had?
Would you think about all them War Vets
And would you start to feel bad?

Freedom isn't free
It costs folks like you and me
And if we don't all chip in
We'll never pay that bill
Freedom isn't free
No, there's a hefty fuckin' fee.
And if you don't throw in your buck 'o five who will?


This song should have been entitled, "Give me all you got but not love", which is a line in the song, or in one particular case, "Give me all you got but not truth".

But in this world of lies, are truth and love the same? I mean exactly the same? That we can write: truth = love?

Joe Jackson - It's Different for Girls

What the Hell is wrong with you tonight?
I can't seem to say or do the right thing
Wanted to be sure you're feeling right
Wanted to be sure we want the same thing

She said, "I can't believe it
You can't, possibly mean it
Don't we, all want the same thing
Don't we, well, who said anything about love?"

"No, not love", she said
"Don't you know that it's different for girls?"
(Don't give me love)
"No, not love", she said
"Don't you know that it's different for girls?"
You're all the same

Mama always told me, "Save yourself
Take a little time and find the right girl
Then again don't end up on the shelf
Logical advice gets you in a whirl"

I know, a lot of things that you don't
You wanna hear some?
She said, "Just give me something
Anything, well, give me all you got but not love"

"No, not love", she said
"Don't you know that it's different for girls?"
(Don't give me love)
"No, not love", she said
"Don't you know that it's different for girls?"

You're all the same
You're all the same
You're all the same

Who said anything about love?
"No, not love", she said
"Don't you know that it's different for girls?"
(Don't give me love)

"No, not love", she said
"Don't you know that it's different for girls?"
(Don't give me love)
"No, no, no, no, not love", she said
"Don't you know that it's different for girls?"

(Don't give me love)
"No, no, no, no, no, not love", she said
"Don't you know that it's different for girls?"

You're all the same
You're all the same
You're all the same
You're all the same


I saw a brief report on the situation on Yemen on RT this morning. Al Qaeda controls a large part, almost a half, of Yemen, and the area they control has a long border with Saudi Arabia.

Has Saudi Arabia been bombing that area? Not as far as we know, but the USA has been droning it, thus driving many in that area into joining al Qaeda and other radical Islamic organisations.

But when the enemies of Islamic State in Syria, the Houthis, begin to challenge for power in Yemen, Saudi Arabia rushes to bomb the shit out of them, killing hundreds of children, without any condemnation whatsoever from the USA.

Contrast that with what has been going on in Syria for 4 years.

And now Islamic State is on the case, on a quest for Houthi blood.

It's such a bleedin' obvious pattern, and supports the report of Seymour Hersh entitled The Redirection which was published in March 2007 and predicted that the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia would unleash the nastiest international cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria, Lebanon and Iran. The Houthis are fighting along side the Syrian Arab Army and Hezbollah in Syria against the Saudi-sponsored, American-trained-and-supported international cutthroat Jihadis in Syria.

And why hasn't Obama released those > 28 pages < on Saudi involvement in 9/11? Another > fact < is this:
7. NATO intelligence services created and control the extreme Islamic terrorists;

But you try telling all this to a teacher!! All they'll want to do is talk about something else and then ostracise you...

Sunday, April 26, 2015


1. the world is a shithole;
2. hardly anyone gives a f***;
3. the British monarchy and their mafia Freemasonry engineered WW1 to implement a world government as the ultimate in empire;
4. NATO and their gulf allies have unleashed the nastiest international cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria;
5. NATO unleashed neo-Nazis to implement a coup in Ukraine to drag Ukraine into NATO;
6. David Cameron uses armed police to seal off a wood in order to secretly shoot pigeons dead.


Webster Tarpley has just returned from a 3 day visit to Donetsk and states that it is the Ukraine Armed Forces who are violating the ceasefire.

Eyewitness Report from the Donetsk People’s Republic

This as those same UAF are reportedly enticing the separatists to attack the Azov Battalion, the UAF describing the Azov Battalion as 'uncontrollable'.

As I said, the Kiev Nazis are looking for a false flag of some kind to start the war again, which is why the UK, USA and Canada are over there 'training' the Kiev Nazis.

But training them in what?

Saturday, April 25, 2015


A video has surfaced of a man being crucified and then burned alive. It is allegedly of a separatist PoW captured by the Kiev Nazis being nailed to a cross, the cross lifted and placed in a hole, and the man set on fire. The Kiev Nazis and their NATO media supporters are saying that the video is fake, some referring to previous videos which turned out to be fake.

But what these deniers fail to mention is that on 2nd May 2014 NATO's neo-Nazis burned 50 people alive in a trade union building in Odessa, shooting at those in the window frames as they prepared to jump, and beat to death those who jumped, from 2nd and 3rd floor windows trying to escape the flames.

I will not show the video but it is out there. If it is fake then it is a very professional one. I would not be surprised if it was real.


While Afro-Americans still suffer extreme prejudice there is apparently already a new civil rights frontier: transgenderism!

That's right.

Never mind that you can get run over or shot in the back by a cop for nothing. If you are a man then it is your civil right to become a woman.

Never mind if you haven't got a job because of the Bilderberg-engineered financial crisis or it was shipped to China. If you are a woman then it is your civil right to become a man.

I've posted this clip before, but it sums up this total insanity.


One of the best interviews I have heard!

Royalty. Kiddie-fiddling. Banking.


Ed Miliband, the John Wayne of British politics, exposed his total ignorance of foreign affairs yesterday in a speech at Chatham House. You can watch Miliband > here <.

Basically, Miliband wants:
1. to impose British values (kiddie-fiddling? looting? fraud? fake democracy? etc) across the globe;
2. humanitarian wars with subsequent plans for peace, i.e. wars for peace;
3. more global governance (bigger, stronger UN, EU and with Britain leading the way);
4. more NATO aggression to curb what he calls "Russian aggression" in Ukraine;
5. tighter controls on visits and returns from Syria, but to do this he wants a stronger, more intrusive police state (without any investigation into why so many Jihadis have somehow found their way to Syria, even when on wanted lists).

He also proposed a two-state solution to the Israel-Palestine conflict, saying that this conflict was the most important obstacle to world peace.

But who or what is Chatham House?

Chatham House was initially founded, allegedly to stop future wars, by the Anglo-American imperialists at Versailles after the British monarchy and their mafia, Freemasonry, had engineered WW1.

But get this lot:
1. Patron is HM Liz;
2. Presidents include:
(a) Paddy Pantsdown (who wanted to bomb the shit out of Syria in 2013);
(b) John Major (who bombed the shit out of Iraq in 1991).
3. Corporate sponsors are the military-industrial-banking complex;
4. And one Evelyn de Rothschild as a member of the Director's Circle.

Miliband either is unaware or hides his awareness of the plan for war and regime change in seven countries in five years revealed to General Wesley Clark, and The Redirection in which Saudi Arabia would unleash the nastiest international cutthroat Jihadi butchers onto Syria, Lebanon and Iran because that initial plan was by 2007 moribund. He is also unaware or hides his awareness of NATO's neo-Nazi coup in Ukraine.

This is very, very dangerous. Under Miliband we will be embroiled in unnecessary wars and potential nuclear conflict with Russia.

This speech yesterday has revealed Miliband as a warmonger prepared to grease the wheels of and give a free, lifetime full service and MoT Certificate to the war machine. He will be among friends at Bilderberg if he wins. He basically called Cameron a weakling, and he wants to expand Britain's role as a chief warmonger, spreading 'British values' at the heart of NATO and other international coalitions.

Well, Ed. If you want to start a war then start one on that sick joke on humanity, that vacuum of democracy The Head-chopping Kingdom of Saudi Arabia that has been unleashing the nastiest international cutthroat Jihadi butchers across North Africa and the Middle East that you just named as the biggest threat to our national security!!


Today is ANZAC Day, marking the 100th anniversary of the Gallipoli campaign. It was a total disaster. Whose fault was it? Winston Churchill's.

But while the media is full of ""Honour Our Glorious Dead" and remembering the 'bravery' of those who fought and died in that doomed campaign, nobody is asking the ultimate question: WHY?

Why did it happen?

Not just Gallipoli but World War One itself?

If you read the far left/Marxists they will tell you that it was going to happen anyway as international capitalists clashed for human and natural resources.

But the facts are these:
1. in the 2nd half of the 19th Century Great Britain was overtaken by Germany and the USA as the dominant economic forces of the world, as they and others collaborated and implemented the American System of Economics, while Great Britain relied on slave economies;
2. Prince, later King, Edward, while Grand Master of the United Grand Lodge of England, began to bring Great Britain out of "splendid isolation" and form an alliance with France and Russia directed against Germany;
3. the British formed The Balkan Committee to manipulate ethnic and national tensions in the Balkans;
4. the Freemasons condemned Arch Duke Ferdinand to death in 1912...and he knew it!;
5. the assassins of Ferdinand were Freemasons and had received encouragement and the materials for the assassination from Freemasons abroad (admitted at their trial);
6. King George V indicated to Germany that Great Britain would not become involved in any subsequent war, while at the same time telling Sir Edward Grey to get Great Britain into any subsequent war;
7. King George's signal of apparent neutrality led to both Russia and Germany mobilising and tiptoeing towards conflict;
7. so when Germany invaded Belgium, having been led to believe by King George that Great Britain would remain neutral, Sir Edward Grey under orders of King George V cited The Treaty of London 1839 which Great Britain did not need to enforce unilaterally, and Great Britain declared war on Germany.
8. after the war Kaiser Wilhelm II wrote in his memoirs that a "distinguished Freemason" told him that Freemasonry had engineered the war to destroy Central Europe.

Thus Germany was tricked, Great Britain through Freemasonry got their war, Germany was surrounded and eventually defeated, and our fathers and grandfathers were slaughtered and maimed in the trenches.

So why did the British monarchy engineer all this bloodshed while they ate the finest food and drank the finest wine in their many palaces?


World government is the ultimate in empire, and the British Empire was under threat of losing its power. So the British monarchy threw a wobbler and set us all to war against each other. Result?
1. Central Europe was devastated;
2. the first attempt at world government in The League of Nations as proposed by Sir Edward Grey and Lord Robert Cecil, i.e. the British Establishment.

The League of Nations failed because the USA voted to stay out of it. This led the British empire into engineering World War 2, with a need to drag the USA into it much earlier than in WW1 so that the USA would suffer many more casualties than in WW1 and thus be persuaded that a world government was required to stop all future wars (but they were not told that the two world wars had been engineered for that purpose).

But the title of this blog is ABSOLUTE MADNESS STILL REIGNS SUPREME.

So what do I mean?

Last year I proposed a protest outside Freemasons Hall in Great Queen Street, London on 28th June 2014 to remember the Freemasonic assassination of Arch Duke Ferdinand that kicked off World War One. Just me turned up, so thanks for that. But what infuriated me was that just the other side of Covent Garden was a massive 'celebration' of blokes sticking their cocks up other blokes arses.

I wonder which our fathers and grandfathers who fought and died in WW1 would appreciate more: a protest outside Freemasons Hall or a 'celebration' of blokes sticking their cocks up other blokes arses.

But today is the 100th anniversary of Churchill's folly of Gallipoli. So are the media full of what I have just written above?

Er, nope.

The story of the day is Bruce Jenner and his tearful last interview as a man before he becomes a woman!

Absolute madness still reigns supreme.

And there are schools and teachers out there who promote such madness, slaughter and couldn't give a **** (well, not in the way that I mean).

Friday, April 24, 2015


What other BUK propaganda are the USA and Kiev Nazis pushing?


End of message.

Wednesday, April 22, 2015


This was the whole point of the coup!!!

Ukraine should decide on joining NATO in a nationwide referendum, Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko said Wednesday.

"I think that it’s the people of Ukraine who should decide on whether to join NATO, because this issue is fundamental as far as the country’s defense and security is concerned. I believe that I will organize a referendum in my country, and my people will have a say on the issue," Poroshenko told France’s iTele information channel.

[source : Poroshenko Set to Hold Referendum on Joining NATO, Sputnik, http://sputniknews.com/europe/20150422/1021242057.html, 22nd April 2015]

I don't know how long it will take to hold this referendum, but I assume it will be held much sooner rather than later.

I predicted this would happen in MY FIRST PREDICTION FOR 2015, but also predicting a large false flag to hasten the process, and before the MH17 report is published.


He still hasn't told us what his relationship with the CIA Neocon Atlantic Council is, has he?

But the thought for t'day is this: what would Eliot Higgins do if the head-chopping Kingdom of Saudi Arabia unleashed the nastiest, most medieval, most barbaric international cutthroat Jihadis onto his home and family?

Or if NATO unleashed neo-Nazis eager for NATO to plonk their first strike nuclear missiles on his next door neighbour's front lawn aimed at his house?

Tuesday, April 21, 2015


#AskLavrov What do you think of the USA and their Coalition of Killing killing approaching 1 million people in Iraq in bogus wars planned years before they occured?

#AskLavrov Why did Russia abstain on the vote of UN SCR 1973?


Senator John McCain, one of THE classic warmongers (he sang, "Bomb! Bomb! Bomb! Bomb! Bomb Iran!" to the tune of Barbara Ann) and suspected agent for Islamic State, has given his stamp of approval to the 60 Minutes report on Ghouta aired last weekend.

McCain is weak in substance and strong on emotion, just like the report.

Has McCain exposed the plan for war and regime change in seven countries in five years as revealed to General Wesley Clark?

Er, nope.


Hat tip to PJW:

If you thought it was bad in the UK, with nearly 200000 abortions every year, or 520 every single day, in the USA their defenceless unborn children suffer a 9/11 every single day. That's right. Every single day 3000 children are aborted/murdered/shredded in the USA.


#12 One very shocking study found that 86 percent of all abortions are done for the sake of convenience.

[source : 19 Statistics About Abortion That Every American Should Know, End Of The American Dream, http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/19-statistics-about-abortion-that-every-american-should-know, 20th April 2015]

Is this why nobody cares, why nobody wants to know the true reasons why we have been or currently are at war with:
1. Afghanistan (true reason: for opium);
2. Iraq (true reason: PNAC, A Clean Break, plan revealed to General Wesley Clark);
3. Libya (true reason: plan revealed to General Wesley Clark);
4. Syria (true reason: A Clean Break, plan revealed to General Wesley Clark, pipeline from the Pars gas field).

Meet the human race: too busy shagging and then killing the resulting children.

When 3000 people die in one day in order to provide the casus belli for a plan for war and regime change in seven countries in five years and to massively increase the powers of the police state, there is global outrage and 14 years of war, terror and increasing surveillance.

But when 3000 children are murdered EVERY DAY, mostly just because their loving, doting parents fancied a shag, hardly anyone says a word in condemnation.

What's wrong here, people?!

Monday, April 20, 2015


I just watched this CBS report on Ghouta:

The report is strong in emotion but weak in substance. Yes, something truly horrendous occured in Ghouta on 21st August 2013. From the images shown in that 60 Minutes report you could describe it as "hell on earth", couldn't you?

"Hell on earth"?

Now where have I heard that phrase before?

Oh, that's right. Prince Bandar used it to describe what he was going to do in Syria to embarrass Putin into dumping Assad.

And that question of why Assad would use chemical weapons against his own people when UN weapons inspectors were just down the road was not answered in that 60 Minutes report either, not even by Pelley or the chemical weapons expert.

The whole horrendous and tragic event of Ghouta was run by the Saudis:
1. the Saudis provided the patsies for 9/11 which kicked off the series of wars and regime changes we have seen in North Africa and the Middle East since then;
2. but by 2007 that plan was moribund so the USA, and the Saudis reached an agreement that the Saudis would unleash the nastiest, most medieval, barbaric cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria, Iran and Lebanon;
3. but these Jihadis needed cover as 'freedom fighters' to hide their barbarity so the US State Dept engineered the Arab Spring;
4. these Jihadis were first unleashed onto Libya, where NATO became the air force of al Qaeda in Islamic Maghreb;
5. after Libya they were smuggled into Syria, perhaps through one of the ratlines that Roland Dumas was asked to organise by British 'Intelligence';
6. but by mid-2013 these Jihadis had still not kicked out Assad, so Bandar was sent to Moscow to give Putin an ultimatum that Bandar would unleash "hell on earth" if Putin didn't dump Assad;
7. Putin rejected this lovely, heart-warming offer;
8. so on 21st August 2013 Bandar kept his promise and unleashed "hell on earth" in Ghouta.

And because the false flag of Ghouta failed to provoke the war by NATO and its Zionist and Gulf state allies wanted to continue their warmongering agenda to transform the world to their benefit, this even more monstrous entity Islamic State was allowed to come to power to provide the excuse to interfere in Syria.

So what is at stake in Syria? Why all this head-chopping and gassing? The prize for winning Syria is a pipeline from the Pars gas field. The Saudis and NATO want a pipeline from the Pars through Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Syria and Turkey to threaten Russia's business and thus influence over Europe; Assad and Putin want a pipeline through Iran, Iraq, Syria and Lebanon to Europe which would not threaten Russia's business with Europe.

For this prize, the Saudis have unleashed the nastiest, most medieval, barbaric international cutthroat Jihadi butchers onto Syria, and with the full support of, though possibly commanded by, this Disunited Fascist Queendom.

Isn't it interesting that 60 Minutes has somehow not discovered the plan for war and regime change in seven countries in five years: Iraq, Iran, Syria, Lebanon, Sudan, Somalia and Libya.

60 Minutes has also somehow missed The Redirection by Seymour Hersh which predicted in 2007, with great accuracy, that the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia were going to unleash the nastiest, most medieval, barbaric international cutthroat Jihadi butchers onto Syria.

Or perhaps CBS and all the other NATO media and social media wannabes are aware of this geopolitical agenda, but like John S Knight and many, many others, they have kept their mouths shut for the benefit of the CIA and MI6 and their masters in Wall Street and The City of London.

Sunday, April 19, 2015


The Belling Cat team have at least read what I wrote yesterday.

But facts are facts:
1. USAID is a CIA front;
2. George Soros is, and is an agent for, pure scum based in Wall Street and The City of London.

In that post yesterday I also questioned the integrity of the Knight Foundation who are sponsoring Hacks/Hackers, the third member of that crime-busting trio. The founder of that foundation, John S Knight, had worked as Director of US Censorship in London during WW2, which showed a keen willingness to control information for the US government. Well, call it synchronicity if you want, but this report published yesterday proves that John S Knight was in bed with the CIA.
There were a lot of bad days during the Cold War, but 54 years ago this weekend was one of the worst, at least for the United States. President John F. Kennedy sent an army of anti-Castro exiles backed by the CIA onto the beach at Cuba’s Bay of Pigs to suffer bloody, catastrophic defeat. It was “the beating of our lives,” the despondent Kennedy would say a few days later as he wondered aloud why nobody had talked him out of it.

One of the piquant questions of Cold War history is, could the Miami Herald have done that — talked him out of it? In a little-known collision of journalism and national security, the Herald, seven months before the Bay of Pigs, had prepared a news story saying that the United States was planning to launch a military operation against Cuba. But the paper’s top management killed the story after CIA Director Allen Dulles said publishing it would hurt national security.

[source : The Miami Herald, the CIA, and the Bay of Pigs scoop that didn’t run, Miami Herald, http://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/community/miami-dade/article18792675.html, 18th July 2015]

Guess who had owned The Miami Herald for 24 years by the time of the Bay of Pigs?

Yep. John S Knight of The Knight Foundation!!

JFK was 'misled' by the CIA over The Bay of Pigs, and it was the Bay of Pigs that led to JFK taking his decision to splinter the CIA into a thousand pieces. This possibly contributed one of the reasons for his assassination.

So of this crime-busting trio we have:
1. OCCRP who are financed by
(a) CIA front USAID;
(b) Scumbag Soros
2. Hacks/Hackers who are financed the Knight Foundation, whose founder, John S Knight, kept secret the disastrous and illegal Bay of Pigs invasion for the benefit of the lying CIA/'national security';
3. Belling Cat founded by Eliot Higgins who has an as yet unexplained relationship with the warmongering CIA Neocon Atlantic Council.

Belling Cat can mock all they want.


Saturday, April 18, 2015


The CIA-Soros-Wall Street agent Eliot Higgins has again tried to protect his mates, the warmongers.

Higgins offers several alternatives of who did Ghouta in August 2013 and attempts to debunk them: The Rebels Faked It; The Rebels Did It (Maybe By Accident) With Saudi Chemical Weapons; Al Qaeda Rebels Did It With Turkey’s Help To Trick the US; Al-Qaeda Rebels Did It With Chemical Weapons From Georgia (The State Not The Country) Smuggled Via Gerogia (The Country Not The State) With The Help Of Google Ideas, DynCorp, And Political Groups In Israel And The US With Additional Fake Intelligence From Israel.

But he has not addressed the scenario and culprit that I believe in, and used to predict in mid August 2013 that something terrible was about to happen in Syria. See THE REPORT OF THE WEEK : BANDAR TO UNLEASH HELL ON EARTH IN SYRIA posted on 15th August2013, and WE CAN STOP THE COMING SLAUGHTER IN SYRIA posted the same day.

Does Higgins honestly think that Assad would provide NATO and their Zionist and Gulf allies with the perfect casus belli by killing hundreds of his own people, and thus also risking provoking a coup attempt by officers of the SAA?

Surely by now, if Assad had indeed gassed hundreds of his own people, the Syrian military would have found out about it, and probably killed him in a coup. That has not happened.

The facts are these:
1. independent of whether you believe 9/11 was an inside job or not, the plan revealed to General Wesley Clark shortly after 9/11, for war and regime change in Iraq, Iran, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Sudan and Sonalia (all of whom had sweet FA to do with 9/11) is being implemented;
2. but because by 2007 this plan was moribund, an agreement was reached in 2007 between the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia that the latter would unleash the nastiest cutthroats onto Syria, Lebanon and Iran;
3. to provide these cutthroats with cover as 'freedom fighters' the US State Department organised The Arab Spring;
4. however, the cutthroats were first unleashed onto another nation named on that list, Libya, in a war in which NATO became the air force of Al Qaeda in Islamic Maghreb;
5. after killing Gaddafi the cutthroats were smuggled into Syria (perhaps in one the ratlines that Roland Dumas was asked to organise by British 'Intelligence'), where they have been slitting the throats and sawing the heads off Syrians ever since;
6. but by the middle of 2013 Assad was still in power, so NATO began to express their anger at Obama through editorials in The Washington Post, sometimes twice a week;
7. and when the SAA captured al Qusair, NATO dispatched Prince Bandar of head-chopping Saudi Arabia to Moscow to threaten/bribe Putin: if Putin would dump Assad then Saudi Arabia would purchase billions of dollars of weapons from Russia, otherwise Bandar would unleash hell in Syria to embarrass Putin into dumping Assad.

Putin rejected this lovely, heart-warming offer.

On 21st August 2013 hell was unleashed in Syria.

Can you guess by whom?

Higgins keeps his mouth shut on this, which is why he is being courted by CIA fronts and awarded prizes.


The coup in Ukraine last year has led to a wave of what NATO media calls 'nationalism', which NATO currently supports. This is just because their man Yats, whose foundation Open Ukraine is sponsored by NATO, is Prime Minister and is gradually dragging Ukraine into the NATO sphere of influence. It will be totally different if Ukraine does join NATO. Those same 'nationalists', if they decide to leave NATO to regain their true independence, will be branded 'terrorists' by NATO, much like the rebels in East Ukraine now. The rebellion in East Ukraine is because the people of East Ukraine recognised the Nazism of the junta in Kiev.

What would you do if a gang of thugs wearing Nazi-symbols, waving flags bearing the image of a famous Nazi collaborator and parading through the streets in a Nazi-esque torchlight parade after burning opponents alive, seized power by shooting dead protestors and police to provoke a riot, setting London ablaze and chasing the legitimately elected leader away, particularly if those Nazis were run by Russia?

Well. that is what happened in Kiev: violent NATO-sponsored Nazis shot dead protestors and police from The Conservatory in Kiev, which provoked extreme violence and eventually Yanukovich fleeing for his life from his burning office. Those same Nazis later burned 50 people alive in the Trade Union building in Odessa.

And there now appears to be a Kiev Nazi hit list being created, a database of names and addresses of people who are considered pro-Russian. When Boris Nemtsov was assassinated the news of his death and funeral march were plastered all over NATO media. But in Ukraine there has been a number of assassinations of politicians and journalists, some of whom are on this Kiev Nazi hit list.

Needless to say, why should NATO media report on this if the Kiev Nazis are being used to drag Ukraine in to NATO?


The OCCRP, in league with BellingCat, should be investigating their sponsors, George Soros and the CIA.

These two have committed, are committing and plan to commit major crimes and major crimes against humanity.

Stop them before it is too late.


In September last year it was announced that:
Open-source investigations site Bellingcat today launched a new project to investigate global networks of crime and corruption.

The London Project Investigathon is a collaboration between Bellingcat, Hacks/Hackers London and the Organised Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP).

It will bring together journalists, investigators and researchers to share knowledge on the latest open-source tools and techniques required to carry out investigations, by organising regular events to work on live projects.

"Because these are transferable skills, we can set them up doing projects that we're giving them but they'll learn stuff that they can use in their own projects," said Eliot Higgins, founder of Bellingcat and the Brown Moses blog on munitions used in the Syrian conflict.

[source : New Bellingcat project to investigate cross-border corruption, Journalism, https://www.journalism.co.uk/news/new-bellingcat-project-to-investigate-cross-border-corruption/s2/a562610/, 29th September 2014]

The Organised Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP) is of great interest. Why? Because it has links to the CIA and George Soros.

The very, very long home page of the Organised Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP) states the following right at the very bottom:
Made possible by Open Society Institute and Soros Foundation Network, and USAID

Can you guess who the OCCRP's Man of the Year is?

I'll give you a few clues:
1. he was the driving force behind the BRICS Development Bank;
2. he stopped the planned war on Syria in 2013 after Prince Bandar's false flag of Ghouta;
3. he is supporting Syria against the not-so-covert invasion of Syria by the Saudi-sponsored international cutthroat Jihadi butchers.

You should have enough now to deduce that OCCRP's Man of the Year is.......VLADIMIR PUTIN!!

Here is what OCCRP say about Putin:
Putin has been a finalist every year so you might consider this a lifetime achievement award. He has been a real innovator in working with organized crime. He has created a military-industrial-political-criminal complex that furthers Russia’s and Putin’s personal interests. I think Putin sees those interests as one and the same.
- Drew Sullivan, Editor of OCCRP

Why should we be very suspicious of the motives of OCCRP?

USAID is a CIA front. It was initially created by JFK to foster economic development and humanitarian projects. But someone put a stop to that on 22nd November 1963 (and it wasn't Lee Harvey Oswald from a sixth floor window). In Vietnam the CIA took over USAID. Since then USAID has been helping to violently and covertly through subversion spread Americanism across the globe.

So why is USAID financing OCCRP, an organisation that apparently has Putin as its number one target?

Hmm. Could it be that OCCRP has a hidden agenda?

And then we have Rothschild agent George Soros. Do you realise how Soros came to be so rich? During the early 1990's Soros attacked several currencies in Europe, including the Pound Sterling with the green light from Buckingham Palace. He lived to tell the tale and is now a powerful man in Bilderberg, which suggests it was all an engineered scam. Soros uses his ill gotten gains to further the agenda by funding colour revolutions in former Soviet states, euthanasia and drug legalisation. For a good expose of who Soros is and what he represents (which is pure scum) see The Secret Financial Network Behind "Wizard" George Soros by William Engdahl, and Your Enemy, George Soros by EIR.

And this Hacks/Hackers partner of BellingCat and OCCRP may not be so independent either. They are funded by the Knight Foundation whose founder worked as US Director of Censorship in London during WW2, thus indicating a strong desire to work for the American government in controlling information.

So far from being an independent good-hearted project, this looks to me like Belling Cat, wittingly or unwittingly, have jumped into bed once again with the CIA-Wall Street cabal, in addition to Higgins' secret undisclosed relationship with the warmongering CIA Neocon Atlantic Council.

Friday, April 17, 2015


The Ken Loach film Hidden Agenda ends with this quote:
It is like layers of an onion, and the more you peel them away, the more you feel like crying. There are two laws running this country: one for the security services and one for the rest of us.
- James Miller, ex-MI5 agent

British Security Services have been implicated in cover ups of paedophiles, possibly for political control.

Yesterday it was reported that a member of the establishment, Lord Greville Janner, would not be prosecuted for kiddie-fiddling because of his 'dementia'.

But it turns out that Janner had a go at the British justice system for not prosecuting a suspected Nazi war criminal for the very same reason of 'dementia'!!


Jeroen Akkermans is the man who claims to have found fragments of a BUK missile at the crash site of MH17, but instead of informing the proper and relevant investigating authorities of the location of these fragments he removed them from the crime scene, and did not inform anyone until months later when analysts said the fragments could come from a BUK missile.

I note that this week members representing the MH17 JIT returned to the crash site. Did they find any mysterious fragments? Has anyone else found any mysterious fragments and handed them over?

This find makes Akkermans a lucky man.

But Akkermans is actually luckier than that.

Because just days after MH17 crashed Akkermans allegedly photographed the man who says he was allegedly sent to the crash site by the separatists to capture the pilots. This man would not give his name but he allowed the lucky Akkermans to take several photographs of him (wearing dark sun glasses, obviously).

And Akkermans is even luckier than that!

Akkermans was in Ukraine, in particular Maidan, taking photographs galore of events at the time of the 'revolution'. In his Flickr account Akkermans does not photograph a single neo Nazi or Nazi symbol or mention their presence in any written report (that I can find)! I mean, how lucky is that?!

So according to Akkermans:
1. he found fragments of the BUK that shot down MH17 even though nobody else over a period of 8 months has found anything similar;
2. he photographed the guy allegedly sent by the separatists to capture the pilots of MH17;
3. he didn't see a single neo Nazi or Nazi symbol throughout the violent NATO-sponsored neo-Nazi coup.

I'd like Akkermans to tell me the numbers of the lotto for this weekend.


Upon the first news of MH17, the US State Department issued this statement:
We are horrified by the crash of Malaysia Airlines flight MH17. There are no words adequate to express our condolences to the families of the nearly 300 victims. We offer our sympathies and support to the Governments of Malaysia and the Netherlands at this difficult time, as well as to all those whose citizens may have been on board. We are reviewing whether any American citizens were aboard the flight. The United States Government remains prepared to assist with a credible, international investigation any way we can, and we will continue to be in touch with all relevant partners as we seek the facts of what happened today.

[source : Crash of Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 in Eastern Ukraine, US State Dept, http://www.state.gov/secretary/remarks/2014/07/229440.htm, 17th July 2014]

Four days later at a State Dept daily press briefing, the following discussion occured:
QUESTION: But first just to follow up on this notion of the disclosure potentially of some of our intelligence information or product by way of satisfying the world’s questions about this affair. Perhaps the more apt analogy than 2002-2003 is Adlai Stevenson at the UN where we had a very serious charge that the Soviet Union at that time had installed missiles on Cuba, and we shared our photographic reconnaissance by way of making that point.

Is that the kind of thing you say the Administration’s considering doing here to satisfy the world’s questions about this?

MS. HARF: I would actually compare it to a more recent event, which is when we talked about the chemical weapons use in Syria. That’s something I lived through, so I know more acutely than Adlai Stevenson’s activities at the UN. But on that, there were a lot of questions, and we attempted to, as the days went on, make more information available until we got to a point where we basically put out an intelligence assessment, not – we didn’t put out every piece of information, but we were able to get as much out there. That’s what we’re trying to do right now. Obviously, it’s always a balance.

QUESTION: Some sort of white paper, as we saw in the Syrian conflict?

MS. HARF: I have no idea what that would look like, but we’re trying to put as much information out as possible.

QUESTION: The reason I ask this is because Secretary Kerry himself seemed to me to be rather forward-leaning in his discussion publicly of intelligence product --

MS. HARF: Absolutely.

QUESTION: -- in a way that was inconsistent with the repeated statements we get from podiums like this that we cannot discuss sources and methods. So, for example, he stated, “We ourselves tracked the imagery of the launch of this surface-to-air missile. We have the trajectory recorded. We have the intercepts of their conversations. We know this from voice identification. We have a video.”

MS. HARF: Yeah.

QUESTION: It seems to me that, having displayed so much of that information across the country on various channels yesterday, the Administration should be quite prepared to back that up.

MS. HARF: It’s in no way inconsistent, James. I think the balance we always try to strike is when we can put as much information out publicly without threat to sources and methods. Many times we can’t. That’s not just something we say because it’s fun to say. Having worked in the intelligence community, it is a fact. But in cases like this, in cases like Syria’s chemical weapons, we endeavor to put as much out as possible when we can do so. And that’s why I was making the point that he was quite forward-leaning yesterday, because we believe it’s important.

[source : Daily Press Briefing, US State Dept, http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/dpb/2014/07/229550.htm#UKRAINE, 21st July 2014]

So Harf basically says, "trust us"!

Should we trust the USA who said Iraq was involved in 9/11 and had WMDs?

Should we trust the USA who is implementing the plan for war and regime change in seven countries in five years that General Wesley Clark revealed?

Should we trust the USA who has unleashed the most medieval international cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria as Seymour Hersh revealed in 2007 would happen?

Should we trust the USA who has been waging war against, and executing violent revolutions in, nearly every nation on God's green Earth?

But from all this extensive intelligence and analysis that the USA says it has, and says it wants to make public but for some reason can't, and in the words of John Kerry "enormous" amounts of evidence, what do we get?

We get this.

I would like to draw your attention to the clouds, or lack thereof in this image. Apparently there was quite a lot of cloud in that area that day. There aren't that many in this image.

And why did it take the USA 4 days to collate this image that a schoolboy or girl could conjure up in 10 minutes?

We do have to ask, why is NATO relying on social media and Eliot Higgins so much when Higgins has some kind of secret undisclosed relationship with the warmongering CIA Neocon Atlantic Council?

Perhaps if we ask him really, really nicely then he might expose that relationship?


It takes two to tango but there are a large number of resources available, physical and human, if you want to kill the resulting child.

Here are the reported number of abortions that have been performed in the UK between 2002 and 2013 inclusive (data from the ONS):

We implemented police state laws over the London bombings of July 2005. Less than 60 people died in that attack. Yet every year we kill nearly 200,000 defenceless children.

And at the same time our education system propagates the myth that Germany started World War 1.

Should we as a nation be proud of ourselves over this?

Thursday, April 16, 2015


Shove your Brief Encounter and Lawrence of Arabia up your arse.

We need many more films like Hidden Agenda by Ken Loach.

The film ends with this quote:
It is like layers of an onion, and the more you peel them away the more you feel like crying. There are two laws running this country: one for the security services and one for the rest of us. - James Miller, ex-MI5 agent

Knowing what we know now about Kincora, Savile, Cyril Smith, etc, what do you think about that?

The problem with Hidden Agenda, as the above quote states, is that it only scratches the surface.

But the even bigger problem is that we all know it but most of us prefer to look the other way and ignore it and ostracise those trying to do something about it!!


In the articles by Akkermans on Ukraine that I can find he does not expose the Nazism of the junta.


Higgins has tweeted this:

Three much bigger lies by omission by Higgins are:
1. refusing to expose the plan for war and regime change in seven countries in five years, and the subsequent unleashing of international cutthroat Jihadis by the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia onto Syria, Lebanon and Iran;
2. refusing to reveal the exact relationship that he has with the warmongering CIA Neocon Atlantic Council;
3. refusing to expose that NATO/EU/IMF unleashed neo Nazis onto Ukraine to kick out Yanukovich in a violent NATO-sponsored neo-Nazi coup because Yanukovich had decided to sign a deal with Russia instead of with the EU, which led to the violence in the East Ukraine and ultimately MH17 whoever or whatever brought it down.


Jeroen Akkermans, the man who allegedly removes potentially damning evidence from a crime scene without any concerns, has tweeted this:

Do you want to know what else is wrong?

Removing potentially damning evidence from a crime scene and holding onto it for months and having it analysed without telling the proper investigating authorities until you are given the conclusions you paid for.


And the MH17 JIT have expressed their scepticism of this evidence. So why are the BBC, the same BBC who:
1. don't tell us the plan for war and regime change in seven countries in five years;
2. portrayed the Kiev Nazis as saints as they shot protestors and police in Maidan and burned people alive in Odessa;
now allowing Akkermans to write all this? And now?


At least 1075!!!

Canada will join a training mission to help Ukraine's military in its struggle against Russian-backed rebels, Prime Minister Stephen Harper said Tuesday, following months of requests for assistance from Ukraine's government.

Starting this summer, roughly 200 troops will be deployed, until March, 2017, to help develop and deliver training for Ukrainian forces personnel.

...Canada's British and American allies are already conducting training missions in Ukraine.

The U.S. has deployed 800 troops to train three — possibly four — battalions in western Ukraine, and the British recently sent 75 soldiers to give instruction in command procedures, tactical intelligence and battlefield first aid.

Canada will only be dealing with recognized Ukrainian government forces and not the kind of ad hoc militias that emerged earlier in the conflict, Kenney said.

[source : Ukraine crisis: Canada sending 200 trainers for Ukraine military, CBC, http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/ukraine-crisis-canada-sending-200-trainers-for-ukraine-military-1.3031806, 14th April 2015]

Those "ad hoc militias" are actually bona fide Nazis who burn people alive!!!

And you can add to that 1075 all the mercs and the spooks.


Higgins has tweeted this:

It's about Jeroen Akkermans and his mysterious shrapnel. Akkermans claims to have found some fragments from the crash site of MH17, taken them away, smuggled them through customs, and had them analysed. The analysts concluded that the fragments were shrapnel from a missile, possibly a BUK missile.

So let's just go through all that again, just to make sure we are absolutely clear what Akkermans has done.

Akkermans claims to have found fragments at a crash site, a crime scene. But rather than inform the investigating authorities where those fragments were so that they could gather the evidence themselves, and/or collecting the fragments and handing them over to the investigating authorities, Akkermans allegedly removed those fragments from the crime scene.

Akkermans then somehow smuggled them through customs and had them analysed by 2 different sets of analysts. Did he pay the analysts for their services? Why did he choose the analysts he selected?

And only a few months later, after the analysts had concluded that the fragments were possibly shrapnel from a BUK missile, did Akkermans tell the investigating authorities.

If this evidence was submitted in a court of law in a proper trial Akkermans would be laughed out of court.

There is no chain of custody.

I could be given some rusty fragments of an air-to-air missile, then say that I found those fragments at the crash site, pay someone to analyse the fragments, and the analysts would say it was shrapnel from an air-to-air missile, but because I said I found the fragments at the crash site and removed them, instead of telling the investigating authorities, the conclusion of the NATO media would be that an air-to-air missile downed MH17.

See. It's dead easy.


Belling Cat have won a prize.

Their prize is apparently for pinning blame for Ghouta on President Assad and for pinning the blame for MH17 on Russia, none of which have been proven in a court of law.

Eliot Higgins, born in 1979, is the founder and pioneer of the network platform Bellingcat. Bloggers and citizen journalists. With his team and many searchers worldwide, it evaluates daily from hundreds of data and video. His analysis brought to light a lot, followed by numerous newspapers and media, could be based in Germany: for example, the use of cluster bombs and chemical weapons by the Syrian regime and the participation of the Russian Buk missile system during the launch of the Air Malaysia airliner MH17.

[source : Google translation of: http://www.hanns-joachim-friedrichs.de/index.php/pressemitteilung-2015.html

This is such a NATO farce.

The real reason Belling Cat have won this prize is for keeping their mouths shut on:
1. their relationship with the warmongering CIA Neocon Atlantic Council;
2. the plan for war and regime change in seven countries in five years;

Wednesday, April 15, 2015


Here's a film we don't see much of these days: The Parallax View.

Warren Beatty stars as an investigative journalist who infiltrates a 'corporation' who recruits lone nuts to become assassins or useful in other ways. Beatty becomes a bit more involved than he would like, and becomes a patsy for an assassination and is killed himself (a warning to others, perhaps?). Loosely referencing the assassinations of JFK and RFK, this thriller is from a genre we don't see much of these days.


The Green Party Manifesto doesn't look too bad either, apart from a handful of policies.

Excellent policies include:
financial trading tax;
money created by public authority accountable to Parliament;
scrap zero-hour contracts and interns;
cancel Trident.

Questionable policies include:
35 hour week (is this an unbreakable maximum?)
no mention of the monarchy, thus implying it will be retained (even though they without question engineered WW1, their Zionist agents engineered WW2 and they have a very friendly relationship with the head-chopping Saudis who were involved in 9/11 and have supplied the finance for the international cutthroat Jihadis who are rampaging through North Africa and the Middle East).


No big surprise here.

Because as I pointed out in UKRAINE WILL JOIN NATO, in 2008 the following was stated by NATO in a summit communique:
23. NATO welcomes Ukraine’s and Georgia’s Euro-Atlantic aspirations for membership in NATO. We agreed today that these countries will become members of NATO.

MH17 is just one part of that propaganda.

Another is the cover up in NATO media of the blatant Nazism of the junta who provoked the violence in Maidan that led to Yanukovich fleeing for his life from his burning office. That Nazism has since become more overt and powerful within the Kiev government.


According to NATO media, Higgins has 'exposed' Assad and has 'exposed' Putin. But curiously neither he nor that same NATO media is keen for him to expose his relationship with the warmongering CIA Neocon Atlantic Council, based in America (fuck yeah!).

Anyway, have you seen this?

Tuesday, April 14, 2015


Cameron gets serenaded in Berwick-upon-Tweed.


Yesterday was quite a significant day for news to show just how insanely paranoid NATO is.

Islamic State recently threatened to burn the USA like 9/11.
The ISIL terrorist group has threatened to “burn the United States again" by conducting terrorist attacks against the country similar to the September, 11, 2001 attacks in New York City and the Washington, DC.

The Takfiri terrorist organization released a propaganda video on Saturday via the Internet titled “We Will Burn America”, warning that Americans are not safe anywhere in the world.

“America thinks it’s safe because of the geographical location,” a voice-over in the video says. “But the dream of Americans to have safety became a mirage.”

"Today there is no safety for any American on the globe," the voice adds, while showing footage of planes crashing into the World Trade Center in New York City as well as acts of savagery by the group in Iraq and Syria.

[source : ISIL threatens to ‘burn America’ like 9/11, Press TV, http://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2015/04/13/406094/ISIL-threatens-to-burn-US-like-911, 13th April 2015]

You remember 9/11 don't you? When, after flying unimpeded around the American skies for nearly 2 hours, some planes flew into the WTC 1 and WTC 2 and even The Pentagon? And after that the USA went to war on Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and covertly Syria?

Well, what would any normal sane government do if they received threats to repeat 9/11 against them? You would expect such a government to slap anyone making such a threat on the list of international terrorists.

But are Islamic State different from Al Qaeda? There are arguments that Islamic State did grow out of al Qaeda in Iraq. But not so long ago al Qaeda distanced itself from Islamic State saying that IS was too brutal even for them.

One year ago, al-Qaeda formally announced its separation from the Iraq and Syria affiliate, deeming the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) too radical for its standards. From there, the Islamist militant group stood alone.

It's shocking to think that in just one year, the Islamic State has caused such upheaval — sending videos of beheadings, massacring thousands of people, actions so brutal that international forces launched an offensive against the militant group.

[source : The Islamic State was dumped by al-Qaeda a year ago. Look where it is now., Washington Post, http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2015/02/03/the-islamic-state-was-dumped-by-al-qaeda-a-year-ago-look-where-it-is-now/, 3rd February 2015]

So if al Qaeda and Islamic State are separate entities now then should Islamic State be placed on the list of terrorists as a separate entity?

Russia and Syria think so, but the USA, UK, France and Jordan think not, instead arguing that IS still remains as part of al Qaeda even though the spider in my bathroom knows they are separate and IS has threatened to do another 9/11 against the USA.
Russia says the United States, Britain, France, and Jordan have rejected Syria’s proposal to add ISIL to the United Nations Security Council’s sanctions list as a separate terrorist group.

"In the UN Security Council's Al-Qaida Sanctions Committee, the United States, Britain, France, and Jordan have blocked Syria’s request supported by Russia to include the Islamic State (ISIL) terrorist group in the sanctions list as a separate group," read the statement issued by the Russian Foreign Ministry on Friday.

According to reports, ISIL Takfiri terrorist group is currently mentioned as al-Qaida in Iraq (AQI) in the UN’s sanctions list.

Moscow, however, said such naming fails to “reflect the true state of affairs” in Syria and Iraq, adding that the terrorist group did not evolve as a branch of al-Qaeda, but was funded and supported by the US and its allies.

"This position has an obvious political motivation - to disclaim responsibility for the growing scale of Islamic State's (ISIL) activities and prove that it is not a new entity that has been brought into existence by the implementation of plans to depose Syrian President Bashar al-Assad but the former al-Qaida in Iraq,” the statement added.

The four countries’ decision shows that “the anti-Assad coalition bears no moral or political responsibility” for the creation of ISIL, the Russian Foreign Ministry said.

Moscow also lashed out at Washington for the emergence of extremist groups in Iraq.

"It won't hurt to mention that AQI owes its emergence to the US invasion of Iraq in 2003," the statement added.
[source : US, Britain, France, Jordan refuse to name ISIL as separate terror group, Press TV, http://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2015/04/10/405650/West-blocks-Syria-request-to-ban-ISIL, 10th April 2015]

So if Islamic State were dumped by al Qaeda and are now a separate entity then why are we not recognising this?

And remember that incident last October when Sweden was hunting a submarine in the channels near Stockholm? The NATO media were repeating that the alleged submarine was Russian. But guess what: it was just a "workboat".
The unknown foreign vessel the Swedish Navy searched for near Stockholm last autumn was actually a “workboat,” a senior navy official says. Local media had alleged a hunt was on to try and find a Russian submarine, which was believed to be in the area.

Swedish Rear Admiral Anders Grenstad told the Swedish TT news agency on Saturday that what was thought to be a vessel or a foreign submarine was actually just a “workboat.”

The Swedish Navy changed the wording from “probable submarine” to “non-submarine” when referring to the reconnaissance mission connected to the unidentified vessel spotted in the Stockholm archipelago.

The massive hunt was used by the Swedish Defense Ministry to justify a six billion kronor ($696 million) hike in defense spending between 2016 and 2020.

[source : Sweden confirms mystery ‘Russian sub’…was in fact a workboat, RT, http://rt.com/news/249109-sweden-submarine-hunt-workboat/, 14th April 2015]

But that didn't stop The Guardian at the time pushing for Sweden to join NATO!
There is an element of farce about the latest submarine hunt in the Stockholm archipelago. A Russian miniature submarine is being pursued by the miniature Swedish navy: 20 years of steady bipartisan cuts to Sweden’s defence budget mean that there is no longer a single helicopter equipped for anti-submarine warfare, and many of the boats involved in the hunt are inflatable.

...Embarrassment lies in store whether this intelligence operation finds anything or not. The only question is who will be most embarrassed. The Russians cannot have meant this particular incursion as a signal, since it was meant to stay secret. If the Swedes succeed in finding and rescuing the submarine, the Russians will look like blundering bullies. If, on the other hand, the Swedes fail, it will be more difficult even for them to believe that their armed forces play any great part in ensuring the security of their country. In the long run, the logic of Sweden’s geostrategic position makes Nato membership almost inevitable. This incursion, coming so soon after the invasion of the Crimea and Ukraine, should help to make the point clear.

[source : The Guardian view on Sweden’s defences: is Nato inevitable?, The Guardian Editorial, http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/oct/20/guardian-view-on-sweden-defence-nato-inevitable, 20th October 2014]

Throughout that editorial the assumption was that the phantom vessel was indeed a Russian submarine. But it was just a "workboat".

Talk about propaganda!!


Iraq (2003)

Lebanon (2006)

Libya (2011)

Syria (2011 - )

Constant threats against Iran.

Sunday, April 12, 2015



Home of The Atlantic Council.

Fuck yeah!

ps I promise. I will never die.


All week I've been baiting him, but he still won't tell us. He may or may not have responded indirectly to my MH17 posts, which is strange considering he is travelling and speaking all over the world about Russian propaganda and issuing reports accusing Russia and Syria of crimes while ignoring the Atlantic Council elephant in the Higgins living room, which is the plan revealed to General Wesley Clark of war and regime change in seven countries in five years.

So I'll ask directly and nicely:

Eliot Higgins, what the fuck is your relationship with the warmongering CIA-Neocon Atlantic Council?

Saturday, April 11, 2015


This video of the MH17 crash is the closest and sharpest yet and was taken very quickly after MH17 crashed, but again there is no vapour trail visible, even though instinctively, as in other videos, the cameraman looks up and around and zooms in and out.





Here is what Rand Paul says about Israel, the source of 9/11 and all the wars since:
I’m proud to support Israel, America’s longtime friend and ally in the Middle East.

Israeli caf├ęs and buses are bombed, towns are victimized by hundreds of rockets, and its citizens are attacked by Palestinian terrorists.

It’s time we took a stand for Israel by standing up to the enemies of Israel, the enemies that murder Israeli citizens.

That’s why I proposed a bill called the “Stand with Israel Act” to cut off the flow of U.S. taxpayer dollars to the Palestinian Authority.

As long as the Palestinian Authority is allied with Hamas not one more tax dollar should flow to them.

[source : Rand Paul Stands With Israel, Rand Paul 2016, https://www.randpaul.com/issue/israel, Accessed 11th April 2015]

Rand has taken "The Pledge".


In Belling Cat's report MH17 : Source of the Separatists' BUK there is a whole chapter dedicated to identifying the BUK that was allegedly seen being transported through separatist-controlled territory on 17th July 2014. That BUK was labeled BUK 3X2 because it looks like the numbers were clumsily painted over and just the middle number is unreadable.

On 5th January this year Belling Cat issued a report that 312 was in the hands of Ukraine Armed Forces.

A report out today by Oliver Fehr entitled About the Buk 312 who allegedly shot down MH17 shows "BUKs 321, 332 and 312, being transported [west] away from Donetsk city area by UAF on March 19, 2014." There were reports that on 29th June the separatists had taken control of the A-1402 regiment's barracks in Donetsk along with their BUKs, but Ukraine said they had withdrawn all BUKs from there by then.

However, this all suggests that BUKs 332 and 312 were in the hands of the UAF.

That leaves BUKs 322 and 302.

So what of BUK 322?

Here is what Soros-funded Aric Toler of Belling Cat tweeted on 5th February 2015.

Which leaves BUK 302, if it exists.

But in another Belling Cat report Geolocating the MH17 Buk Convoy in Russia a commenter called Alex Livesy states that BUK's 312 and...BUK 302 are owned by Ukraine!!! BUK 312 is confirmed by Belling Cat and Fehr.

So is BUK 302 owned by Ukraine?

The video in the Fehr report shows that BUKs 332 and 312 are Ukraine. Toler says BUK 322 is not the BUK. And now BUK 302 is Ukraine too?

So where does that leave Belling Cat?


Below is the proposed position of a BUK belonging to the Ukraine Armed Forces on 17th July 2014.

This was found from the coordinates given on one of the images released by the Russian MoD at their press conference on 21st July 2014.

The time given is 1132 but no time zone is given.

You will see that in the above photo there are 3 proposed components of the BUK battery. I have also looked on Google Earth at the other sites whose coordinates are given in satellite images presented at that conference and they show activity around 17th July 2014. This one in particular definitely does look like it was a military base around 17th July 2014 on Google Maps.

On 25th July, 4 days after the Russian MoD press conference at which these photos were released, Paris Match published its now infamous photo of a BUK on a red trailer being pulled by that Volvo cabin between Donetsk and Torez.

So my questions are:
1. if in the first photo those units really are components of a BUK battery, and the image was taken on 17th July 2014, then how did they get there and when? Would it be possible to transport them through Donetsk or from the south?
2. if in the first photo that alleged BUK battery was given to the separatists by Russia then would Russia point out their location on 17th July 2014?
3. what did the residents of Zaroshchens'ke, just north of the S bend in the first photo, see on 17th July 2014?


The Trades Unionist and Socialist Coalition (TUSC) opened their election campaign yesterday. Their manifesto is more radical than Labour but is still not radical enough for me, and includes some policies that I would question, but that number is less than a handful.

So in addition to the TUSC manifesto I would also:
1. tax the hell out of The City of London with an at least 1% financial trading tax;
2. bring money creation and supply into public hands and create money to improve society not for the benefit of a cabal of parasites;
3. abolish the British monarchy;
4. abolish Freemasonry;
5. create a special task force to hunt down and bring to trial the major instigators of the recent financial crash (and I would give that special task force a clue : Bilderberg);
6 create a special task force to look into the activities of Bilderberg with the aim of trying for treason any attendee who does not confess into what Bilderberg does, how it operates and what their particular role is;
7. outlaw any serving politician from associating with Bilderberg, Trilateral Commission, Bohemian Grove, etc.;
8. create a special history task force to look into how and why World War One really occured.

And that is just for starters.

If you vote red, blue, green, yellow, orange, purple, or any other colour then you will in reality just be voting for one of fifty shades of austerity.

We need to gut our society of the warmongers, the traitors and the parasites and rid ourselves of the Venetian cancer who came here to create that monstrosity called The City of London.


Oops! I almost forgot this:
9. create a truly independent panel to investigate allegations of Whitehall/VIP/Buckingham Palace paedophilia and murder.

Friday, April 10, 2015


Here is the tapes released by the Ukraine Security Service on 18th July which they say were recordings of separatists on the morning of 17th July.

If these tapes are to be believed then the Ukraine Security Service knew for certain that on the morning of 17th July:
1. the separatists had at least one BUK system;
2. the separatists near Marinovka already had a BUK system.

So why did they not alert civilian air traffic control?

BUKs can hit a target at well over 20Km altitude and fly to hit their target for 40Km. MH17 was at 10Km altitude.

And here is another question:
A woman on Zello described herself as being in Oktyabr when she saw a missile fly over her head. She identified the direction of the launch site as Saurivka. But this Oktyabr is actually the village identified as Chervonyi Zhovten on Google Maps that a Reuters reporter recently visited and made stuff up about witnesses seeing missiles. And not only that, Saurivka is SSW of Chervonyi Zhovten but the proposed launch site is east of Chervonyi Zhovten!!!

But this makes it possible that if, repeat if, MH17 was shot down by a BUK then it was shot down by the BUK system at Marinovka, because Marinovka is just 8 Km from Saurivka. But if so then how did the photographer north of Torez see the alleged vapour trail?

And why did the many Kiev Nazis trapped in that area not see the vapour trail?

So again, contradictions, contradictions, contradictions galore.


On 16th July the separatists began to attack the Kiev Nazis at Marynivka, which is just 10 Km from the proposed launch site of the BUK missile that some suggest brought down MH17. The Kiev Nazis repelled the attacks, and so on 17th July the day that MH17 fell out of the sky, Kiev Nazis were just 10 Km from the proposed launch site. Yet not one of them saw the plume of smoke and thus took a photograph of it otherwise we would definitely have heard about it by now. But apparently an anonymous man based north of Torez, 14 Km away from the proposed launch site, and closely connected to the Ukraine Security service allegedly took a photograph of the vapour trail.

Also, on 16th July, the Kiev Nazi Air Force bombed separatists based at the Saur-Mogila monument who were shelling the Kiev Nazis at Marynivka. The Kiev Nazi Air Force also bombed Shnizhne and killed civilians on 15th July. Yet while the battle for Stepanivka raged on 17th July the Kiev Nazi Air Force says it did nothing on 17th July 2014, having bombed separatist positions at Saur Mogila and having bombed Shnizhne killing civilians the days before.

And what's more, on 17th July 2014 the Saur Mogila hill and monument were held by the separatists. The monument is just 5 Km from the proposed launch site and overlooks with a clear view the proposed launch site. I would be very surprised if nobody on that hill didn't see the vapour trail and point it out to their fellow fighters. There have been suggestions in the NATO media that the unit that allegedly shot down MH7 with a BUK have been murdered. I would also suggest that everyone on Saur Mogila hill would have to be murdered too.

[All distances from Google Maps 'Measure distance' facility]

Thursday, April 09, 2015


Teach the ignorant as much as you can; society is culpable in not providing a free education for all and it must answer for the night which it produces. If the soul is left in darkness sins will be committed. The guilty one is not he who commits the sin, but he who causes the darkness.

[source : Les Miserables, Victor Hugo]

And so it is with MH17.

In WHO IS ULTIMATELY TO BLAME FOR MH17? I laid out the evidence that Ukraine has suffered a violent neo-Nazi coup sponsored in part by NATO but definitely covered up by the NATO media. That coup was due to the legitimately elected President Yanukovich being chased out of his burning office following his decision to sign a deal with Russia instead of with the EU/IMF cabal. And we now know, but before only suspected, that the neo Nazis provoked the violence by shooting protestors and police from The Conservatory. East Ukraine recognised this Nazism of the junta and rebelled. This led to the civil war, and ultimately MH17 being shot down, by BUK, fighter jet or both. Without the coup then MH17 would more than likely have not been shot down. And if the NATO media had told the truth about the coup then the British public would not have supported it.

And so it is with the wars in North Africa and the Middle East. They are a plan revealed to General Wesley Clark. Seven nations in five years were to experience war and regime change: Iraq, Iran, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Sudan and Somalia. But by 2007 only Iraq had experienced both, so the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia agreed that the latter would unleash the nastiest international cutthroat Jihadi butchers onto Syria, Lebanon and Iran. But 4 years after these Jiahdis were unleashed onto Syria, and one huge failed false flag at Ghouta designed to provoke a NATO war on Syria, President Assad is still in power. So in the last year the medieval Islamic State was allowed to rise to pose a threat to the whole world. So much so that even Canada is now bombing Syria.

Teach the ignorant as much as you can; society is culpable in not providing a free education for all and it must answer for the night which it produces. If the soul is left in darkness sins will be committed. The guilty one is not he who commits the sin, but he who causes the darkness.


Why aren't people sick to death of war?

Wednesday, April 08, 2015


Below are just some of the videos filmed by several people close to the crash site of MH17, some very, very close indeed. In these videos we:
1. do not see any vapour trail of a BUK missile;
2. do not hear anyone pointing out that they see a vapour trail of a BUK missile.

The vapour trail of a BUK missile can be seen for a number minutes after launch, depending on atmospheric conditions.

At the moment there are just two photographs, taken by the same person, showing a plume of smoke which some say is the vapour trail of a BUK missile. That photographer just happened to have close contacts with the Ukraine Security Service.

So let's recap the evidence for a missile strike on MH17.

The evidence for is two photographs of a plume of smoke which some say is the vapour trail of a BUK missile, but
(a) the photographer had close links to the Ukraine Security Service;
(b) the photographer was 8Km from the alleged launch site;
(c) nobody else took a photograph of this plume smoke even though there are several towns and villages within just a few miles of the alleged launch site, and there were even members of the Ukraine military just a mile or two from the alleged launch site who were fighting in the Battle of Saur-Mogila, none of whom photographed the plume;
(d) a Reuters report on residents in a village seeing the smoke was discredited when one of the interviewees said that Reuters made it all up.

The evidence against consists of:
1. at least 7 eyewitnesses who state on camera that they saw fighter jets close to MH17;
2. several videos (see above) filmed almost immediately after MH17 fell out of the sky which show no vapour trail or people pointing out or shouting that they see a vapour trail.

In addition there are the contradictory 'proofs' from Der Spiegel and Correctiv who state that, based on anonymous eyewitnesses (as opposed to those who state on camera for RT and BBC that they saw fighter jets), a BUK was launched from a field 3Km north of Shnizhne (and if so why did nobody photograph the vapour trail?), and the Ukraine Security Service who within hours of MH17 crashing released a tape of alleged phone intercepts which they said proved 100% beyond doubt that Cossacks based at Chernukino shot down MH17 with a BUK. However, the US State department cannot believe those tapes because according to data collected from their 'sensors' a missile was launched from the Shnizhne area, but instead of releasing the raw data they instead released a simple image of an arc and a straight line intercepting over East Ukraine, an image that a schoolboy could create in a few minutes.

And yes, that is the same US State Department that ran the Arab Spring, and told us that Iraq had WMDs and was involved in 9/11, and that Osama bin Laden had done 9/11 and was hiding out in Afghanistan dragging his kidney dialysis machine behind him as he was allowed to escape from Tora Bora, etc. Their list of lies goes on and on and on...

And we now know that in the Belling Cat team pushing the BUK missile theory:
1. Aric Toler is paid by George Soros;
2. Eliot Higgins is up to something with The Atlantic Council which is run by the Neocon-CIA warmongers.

So the thought for t'day is: why did only one person 8Km away photograph a plume of smoke, but nobody filmed that plume on videos that were obviously filmed just after MH17 came down, and why on those videos is nobody pointing out a plume of smoke, while there are at least 7 eyewitnesses who state on camera that they saw fighter jets?