Sunday, June 29, 2014


Unless something important comes up I'm taking a break.

Yesterday could have been momentous, but it wasn't. Not only was I zapped into not being in the mood on the day (which I warned would happen), but I was also very surprisingly on my own. I know that a lot of powerful people read this blog, and that a lot of powerful people who oppose them also read this blog. I would have been up for shouting Freemason's Hall down with a little bit of support, but nobody turned up when I asked for help. Nobody.

I am therefore disillusioned with everyone.

And it didn't help seeing Central London shut down so that the gay NATO agenda that Dr Richard Day stated would occur could be advanced by people more concerned about homosexual sex than the true and horrific origins of World War One that are based in buildings within a one mile radius of Trafalgar Square, The Strand and Whitehall.

Still shaking my head in disbelief...


As stated earlier. This is what this blog says. What do you agree/disagree with?

1. World War One was a British Freemasonic conspiracy to establish a world government, The League of Nations, under their control. King Edward VII as Grand Master of the United Grand Lodge of England engineered the Triple Entente. This job was finalised by Sir Edward Grey, a protege of Edward. Freemasonry had condemned Ferdinand to death. The assassins of Arch Duke Ferdinand were Freemasons, had received the material and encouragement for the assassination from foreign Freemasons, and knew that Freemasonry was looking for assassins to kill Ferdinand and had condemned Ferdinand to death. King George V told Kaiser Wilhelm that Great Britain would not fight in any war. Grey misrepresented the British position, not making it clear to Germany what would happen if Germany invaded Belgium, but as soon as Germany invaded Belgium the 1839 Treaty of London was cited to declare war on Germany when Great Britain was not legally bound to defend Belgium unilaterally. After the war Kaiser Wilhelm wrote in his memoirs that he was told by a distinguished Freemason that Freemasonry had engineered the war to create a power vacuum in Central Europe. That vacuum was filled by The League of Nations, whose first President was James Eric Drummond, a protege of Sir Edward Grey. In addition to this, WW1 allowed the British/Jewish/Freemasonic Empire to eventually overthrow the Romanovs. Freemasonry had attempted several times in the first half of the 19th Century to overthrow the Russian rulers, but Freemasonry was eventually banned in Russia, leading to no attempt at revolution in Russia for 44 years. But then Alexander II decided to help Lincoln defeat the Britsh-supported slave-owning Confederacy in the US civil war by sending he The Russian Navy to New York and San Francisco. Lincoln won the war but was assassinated by a British conspiracy. This victory over the Confederacy also led to an immediate explosion in attempts to assassinate Alexander II. When, after several failed attempts, he was eventually assassinated, there were several attempts on his successor's life. The British through Anglophile Jewish bankers Rothschild and Schiff financed Japan against Russia in 1904 and supported revolution in Russia in 1905, but that failed. However, after 3 years of fighting against Germany in the Freemasonic-engineered World War 1, Russia was finally ready for revolution. Lenin was sent into Russia by the Warburgs on a sealed train loaded with Rothschild gold, while Trotsky who was living in New York was given an American passport, was detained at Halifax, Canada on his way to Russia but was released on the orders of the British Admiralty to join the revolution in Russia. But according to Christian Rakovsky, Trotsky was supposed to continue the revolution into Europe, but nationalists Lenin and Stalin stalled the world revolution. This, according to Rakovsky, is why Hitler was created, to lead to the overthrow of Stalin by Trotsky, but Stalin killed Trotsky before this could occur, so Hitler was unleashed onto Russia the following year. We have no way of verifying if Rakovsky ever said this or if it is made up. Some things Rakovsky says ring true, but the interrogations were allegedly 'found' in the belongings of a dead man and describe events that occured years earlier. So some doubt remains.

2. Sir Edward Grey was appointed British Ambassador to the USA to persuade it to join the League of Nations, the same League of Nations that he proposed to Colonel House in 1915. But Grey failed. Another explanation for WW2, and the one I believe in, is that because the USA voted to stay out of The League of Nations, both Wall Street and The City of London created both Nazi Germany and Communist Russia, whose close proximity guaranteed another world war. To persuade the USA that it should join the world government that was to be proposed after the engineered chaos it was necessary that the USA be dragged into the bloodlust from the start. This was achieved through the attack at Pearl Harbor. The result of WW2 was The United Nations, which since its creation has been gradually assuming more and more control over national sovereignty. The UN is supported by a network of continental governments like the EU, NAU, etc, related free trade agreements and other world institutions such as the IMF.

3. 9/11 was an inside job which was designed to kick off wars in North Africa and the Middle East as detailed in the Zionist warmongering documents A Clean Break and Rebuilding America's Defenses. Key members of PNAC were in charge of the US military on 9/11 as it was conveniently AWOL, allowing Saudi-supplied patsies to create the "new Pearl Harbor" that the Zionists/PNAC wanted to go on their bloody global warmongering rampage. Shortly after 9/11 General Wesley Clark was told that the plan was for totaler krieg on nations named in A Clean Break and Rebuilding America's Defenses: Iraq, Iran, Syria and Lebanon, with Libya, Sudan and Somalia. But by 2007 this plan was moribund so a Plan B was agreed that Saudi Arabia, having supplied the patsies for 9/11, would unleash cutthroat Jihadis onto Lebanon, Syria and Iran to either overthrow their current governments or cause so much carnage and such a humanitarian disaster that NATO would intervene under R2P. But to hide the medieval barbarity of the cutthroat Jihadis so that NATO could support them the cutthroat Jihadis needed cover, which was provided by US State Department's The Arab Spring. These Jihadis were first unleashed onto Libya, a war which Owen Jones supported, and then onto Syria, where for over for 3 years they have been slitting the throats of defenceless Syrian children, eating the hearts of their prisoners and last August, in a desperate attempt to provoke large scale military intervention by NATO on their behalf, they pulled a fast one by claiming that Assad had used chemical weapons at Ghouta, killing a thousand Syrian civilians, when they stood to benefit from such action (cui bono?), they possessed chemical weapons, they had posted videos of their experiments with chemical weapons on the internet, and their sponsor Bandar bin Sultan had personally threatened President Putin that he, Bandar, would unleash hell on earth in Syria if Putin didn't dump Assad.

A letter is alleged to have been written by Albert Pike to Giuseppe Mazzini detailing, or Pike otherwise proposed, a plan for three world wars to create a world government. The man who exposed this alleged letter to the world was William Guy Carr. However, no physical evidence for the existence of this letter has been provided. All we have is Carr's claim to have read it and he does not provide a reliable reference for it. Indeed, Carr's references to Cardinal Rodriguez are muddled. Carr wrote of this letter after WW2, so the paragraphs referring to world wars 1 and 2 could have been written after the fact. And Carr is very sympathetic to King Edward VIII, who was forced to abdicate because he was a bona fide Nazi who continued to collaborate with the Nazis even after being banished to a quiet corner of the British Empire while we were at war with the Nazis. Carr's books are strongly anti-Communist, and blame 'the Jews' and Jews alone for all our troubles as part of a Jewish Illuminati conspiracy while absolving the British Royal family of any wrongdoing. I was once a believer that Carr was possibly right. But this now makes me suspicious of Carr and that damned letter.

4. Great Britain has had a Covenant of Security with the Islamic terrorists for well over a decade. We created al Qaeda to kick Russia out of Afghanistan, but continued that relationship into the 1990s, allowing Osama bin Laden to live in London, and allowing other Islamic terrorist organisations to recruit and locate their HQs in London. When several nations offered to either capture and hand over bin Laden, or when the opportunity to assassinate bin Laden arose, these opportunities were refused. Bin Laden was later accused of 9/11. He denies involvement. The FBI did not explicitly list 9/11 as a crime for which he was wanted. Dossiers on his guilt were promised but were never produced, or those that were were laughable. Bin Laden died from Marfan Syndrome in late 2001/early 2002, which explains why he rarely appeared in videos after 9/11, and only lookalikes were used in those that were released. The most comical video was that taken from behind what is alleged to be bin Laden as he watched TV allegedly in the compound in Abbotabad where he was allegedly killed in 2011. This comedy was reinforced by the staged photos and ever changing and contradictory narratives of what actually happened at the compound. But what cannot be denied is that by 2001 the Taliban had reduced the Afghan opium harvest to virtually zero, but after a decade of NATO presence and protection that harvest was at record levels and the resulting explosion of heroin addiction is destroying NATO enemies Russia and Iran, as well as our own youth. Our ruling families have been controlling the opium trade for centuries.

5. There is something not right with both the revelations of Ed Snowden and the media reaction to them. Snowden's revelations were brought to us by that flag ship of the NATO media, The Guardian, but also The Washington Post, the mouthpiece of Bilderberg. His revelations about spying were on the front pages not just for one day, or just 2 days. His revelations were on the front pages for months! Even after he 'escaped' to Russia! But what has he told us? A significant minority were already aware of Echelon in 1999. It would have been naive to believe that Echelon would not have evolved with the rise in social media and other forms of electronic and digital communication. I would not be surprised if the NSA and GCHQ had power of veto on a lot of technology in the public arena, allowing only those they thought could be hacked. But what has happened since last year? The world now knows we are spied on, but laws have been changed to allow such spying, and most people are thankful for it because of the threat of al Qaeda in Syria and Iraq. And as explained above, MI5 allowed the butcher of Lee Rigby, Michael Adebalajo, and others to preach Jihad against Assad on the streets of London (and apparently Bristol too) to create a constant supply of Jihadis to join al Qaeda in Syria, from where they have now invaded Iraq under the flag of ISIS. Cameron, May, the heads of MI5, MI6, GCHQ all now cry that Snowden has aided the enemy al Qaeda and demand more surveillance powers to 'protect' us. Meanhwile, Snowden's assistant Glenn Greenwald has had well over a year to expose everything that Snowden has to say, but after all that time he is still, according to his own admission in GQ magazine, sitting on NSA bombshells, while finding the time to sign lucrative contracts. Greenwald has teamed up with Jeremy Scahill. It was Scahill who became a NATO media darling last November, with fawning articles written about him in both The Guardian and The Independent, as he bullied Stop The War to kick Mother Agnes Mariam off their guest speaker list, but Agnes had the humility to spare Stop The War the embarrassment of obliging the vain petulant Scahill and withdrew herself. Scahill is on video stating that he is a 9/11 gatekeeper and believes the official 9/11 narrative. As does Snowden, which is why he was prepared to believe Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld and go to Iraq to kill Iraqis after 9/11. USA! USA! USA! USA! USA!

6. Alexander Litvinenko was murdered in late 2006. Most fingers immediately pointed at Putin. Mine didn't. Well over 7 years later and we have still not seen any evidence to support this claim. And despite calls for a public inquiry from all sides, the British government has always found an excuse to withhold what evidence it says it has. Last year would have been the perfect opportunity to reveal to the world the evidence that Putin killed Litvinenko, as the UK, France, USA, Saudi Arabia and all the other Friends of Syrian Terrorists were looking for ways to embarrass Putin into dumping Assad. Indeed, they sent Bandar to Moscow to personally threaten Putin. But instead of revealing what evidence they say they have, they instead chose to murder hundreds of Syrian children and claim that Assad had used chemical weapons. And this links to point 5. because Mother Agnes Mariam claims there is good evidence to show that the dead children shown in videos that the Syrian rebels claim were taken immediately after the alleged use of chemical weapons at Ghouta were actually children from the town of Lattakia which was invaded a few weeks before Ghouta by Syrian rebels who took the children away. Parents of those children have identified their children in those videos. So rather than reveal what evidence they say they have on Putin, they would rather klll hundreds of Syrian children. What does that say about our leaders, eh? And another strange thing about the Litvinenko death. Litvinenko worked for Boris Berezovsky, who was given one whole BBC QT to attack Putin and Russia, and to call for violent revolution in Russia to overthrow Putin. Just before Berezovsky was due to give evidence about Litvinenko he allegedly committed suicide, and in a very strange and awkward way. And Berezovsky had written to Putin asking for clemency and a return to Russia. Was all this due to Putin seeking fairer terms on Russian natural resources and for jailing Mikhail Khordokovsky, the agent of the Rothschilds in Russia?

7. Banking in the early United States is not something I was interested in at school, but it is to me now a fascinating subject. I once believed in The Money Masters, and Secrets of The Federal Reserve, but after my own research both of these are hiding something. I believe that President Andrew Jackson was a traitor, witting or unwitting, more likely witting due to his clear association with Aaron Burr and Martin van Buren. This view is due to the works of LPAC. However, there are several anomalies that they also need to explain. These are:
a) why was Thomas Willing, with his clear family links and deep friendship to the Baring family, who were apparently at the heart of the British Empire, allowed to run the early banks of the United States?
b) why were Barings, despite their links to The British East India Company and The British Empire, appointed agents of The United States Government?
c) why did Barings support the expansion of the USA (they assisted the purchases of Louisiana, Alaska), support the USA in 1812 war AGAINST the British, extended huge lines of credit to Nicholas Biddle for the BUS2 which if denied could have destroyed the USA (which the British Empire allegedly wanted), and even assisted Lincoln by financing the purchase of warships for The Union during the British-engineered US Civil War?
d) there appears to have been some kind of turf war between The Rothschilds and Barings over the USA. Was the attack on BUS2 due to this and nothing more? I have written to both Webster Tarpley and Anton Chaitkin about this, but so far without reply.

8. One of the great mysteries of the world is the clear presence of that most Satanic of symbols, the inverted, irregular and incomplete pentagram, pointing down into the White House, in the street design of Washington DC. The architecture of DC is so Masonic it is ridiculous to deny that Masonry has had some long term project for America. The most damning evidence is that the cornerstone of The Capitol was laid in a bizarre Masonic ceremony (aren't they usually?), and involved laying a plaque referring to the year of Masonry 5793, which indicates that Masonry is approximately 6000 years old and not just a few centuries old as most Masonic sites would have you believe. In fact, it is fair to say that the USA is The United States of Masonry. But along with this plaque is the obelisk called The Washington Monument, all street designs marking out hexagrams etc, some lined up with sunrises and sunsets on special days. It is all there. Yet there is no book that I am aware of that was written by the founding fathers to explain why this was done! It is all very bizarre. But then again, we are talking about Masonry, the engineers of World War 1, and if my argument in point 2. above is correct, then also WW2. But in addition to the inverted, irregular and incomplete pentagram is Moloch, which has The Capitol in its belly. Moloch the owl is the symbol of Bohemian Grove, at which a mock human sacrifice occurs in front of a 40 ft stone owl to the sounds of demonic laughter played over a PA system.

9. Since the fall of the Berlin Wall, NATO has reneged on its statement to Russia that it would not expand, and has expanded relentlessly, so much so that Ukraine is about to be NATO-ised. From Checkpoint Charlie to the checkpoints between Ukraine and Russia, NATO has expanded and expanded and expanded, consuming most of what was the western part of the Soviet Empire. In 2004 there was a CIA Color Revolution in Ukraine sponsored by Berezovsky and Soros. This was one in a series of Color Revolutions in the former Soviet Bloc. But it failed. Between now and then a Russophobe and then a Russophile has run Ukraine. The EU and IMF were seeking a deal with Ukraine, but the Russophile Yanukovich was offered a better deal by Putin, so Yanukovich went for that. It was then that all hell broke loose in Ukraine. Snipers shooting from buildings occupied by protestors shot dead protestors. The police were accused in NATO media of the killings. The protestors, by this time hijacked by bona fide neo Nazis, stormed government buildings, chased the legitimate government away and made themselves rulers. Neo Nazis then occupied very powerful positions in the new 'government', including national security and justice. The new PM, Yatseniuk, aka Yats, was hand picked by the US State Dept's Victoria Nuland, the wife of founder of PNAC (see point 3 above), and runs a foundation indirectly linked to Soros but which explicitly lists NATO as a partner! Nuland has also admitted that the USA has spent over $5 billion on regime change in Ukraine. So it is fair to say that Ukraine has just suffered a violent NATO-sponsored neo-Nazi coup. In Odessa, protestors against the neo Nazi junta were chased into a building which was subsequently set ablaze, forcing the protestors to jump from 2nd and 3rd floor windows, where they were shot at by the neo Nazis, and if they survived the jump were beaten to death by the neo Nazis. A recent protest outside the Russian Embassy in Kiev turned violent and Nazi swastikas were painted on the fence of the embassy. But according to the NATO flag ship The Guardian, exposer of The Snowden Revelations, what occured in Ukraine was a romantic bloodless uprising of downtrodden Ukrainians against a Russophile tyranny. But were the protests in The Maidan brutally put down? No. So how could it have been a tyranny? The real heavy duty violence started when Yanukovich decided to sign the deal with Russia and the violence came from the neo Nazis. Now the new Ukraine government is signing or negotiating all sorts of deals with the EU and IMF. A text book coup.

10. Bilderberg has a very strong influence on current affairs. It was started and financed by the financiers of and collaborators with the Nazis, the Rockefellers. The revelations of Willy Claes in 2010, in which he exposed how Bilderberg works, are testament to what we believed sort of happened at Bilderberg. Attendees are invited to give talks, to express their point of view, and are then given tasks by the Bilderberg Steering Committee (or whoever controls them) to do within their sphere of influence to advance the Bilderberg agenda. So what is their agenda? More world government by stealth. And more fascist austerity.

11. JFK was assassinated. Oliver Stone first raised my curiosity in the deep state with his film on JFK. it was after watching this film that I read his references which led me to borrowing a number of related books from the local library on this subject and others. I believe it was this that started the gang stalking which has led to the zapping. The thesis of Stone's film is that it was The Cubans with assistance from disgruntled anti-Communist CIA and top brass in revenge for JFK abandoning the invasion of Cuba at The Bay of Pigs and for rapprochement with Russia. However, there is a lot more to it than that, which implicates the British Empire, who JFK was threatening with his policies of global development. This sort of links to FDR too. LPAC and Tarpley give some good evidence that FDR was not the devil he is portrayed to be. I believe that he was innocent of Pearl Harbor, and that he intended to dismantle the British Empire after WW2, which is why he was poisoned to death, and why there was no autopsy, and why his body has not been exhumed for an autopsy. FDR still has some questions to answer, such as why he appointed George C Marshall, who is implicated in Pearl Harbor and advancing Communism.

12. Russia Today is beginning to concern me a bit. Zac Goldsmith MP has appeared on a number of occasions recently. Yet Goldsmith has recently married into THE Rothschild banking family, the one that established NM Rothschild, the bank that dominated the gold market for centuries, and arguably financed the creation of that curse upon mankind, Israel. Goldsmith appeared on RT to push recall, which is unnecessary and open to abuse. Yet not one presenter or reporter on RT asked Goldsmith what he or his in-laws know about 9/11!! Not even Galloway!! Other concerns are:
a) when the crisis in Ukraine kicked off, Abby Martin kicked off the criticism of the Russian government while ignoring the blatant presence and violent influence of neo Nazis and the obvious hands of NATO pulling the strings. This eventually led to another presenter resigning in protest at Putin. This whole episode was used to embarrass Putin.
b) NATO media was banned from reporting on the case of Holly Greig, a girl who was allegedly abused by a paedophile ring that could have led all the way into Downing Street. By reporting on this RT could have caused some serious embarrassment to the British government, but as far as I am aware this opportunity was not taken. Was RT also slapped with a ban on reporting on this? If so, by whom? And why? And why did RT acquiesce?
c) There were 2 recent Snowden days on RT. The first celebrating Snowden's revelations, the second celebrating his escape to Russia. Whole days were filled with Snowden, Snowden, Snowden. Yet on Youtube there are several videos of General Wesley Clark relating what he experienced regarding 9/11, i.e. the plan for totaler krieg and Wolfowitz stating in 1991 that the USA had 5 to 10 years to take out those old Soviet client regimes; Iraq, Iran, Syria. So why hasn't RT had one day dedicated to Clark's Revelations? Has RT shown one of Clark's videos, or excerpts from one? The wars in the Middle East could be stopped by such a dedicated exposure. But with the above, I am not that confident it will occur. Thus I refer to Russia Today as Rothschild Today. Whether Putin is aware of this, or exercises editorial policy at RT, I don't know.


In response to the undead Dick Cheney's launching of The Coalition for a Strong America, which resurrects the moribund PNAC agenda for totaler krieg, while Cheney refers to President Obama as the weakness in the White House, and the growing evidence that President Obama is not totally controlled on American foreign policy, I suggest that there should be The Coalition for a Strong Obama, to give either the one or two fingered salute to the warmongers and #BringBackPeace.

Bring back the drones.

Bring back the support for the cutthroat Jihadis.

Maybe, just maybe, he gets to keep his Nobel Peace Prize.


President Obama has sent a team of top CIA agents to nice Great Britain because he doesn't trust the Brits and their reports on Islamic radicals in nice Great Britain.

President Obama has sent a special unit of CIA officers to the UK to investigate British Muslim extremists amid growing fears in Washington that we are becoming a ‘breeding ground’ for terrorism.

In a pointed snub to MI5, the agents arrived on a ‘lone wolf’ mission to interrogate senior security experts about the radicalisation of UK Muslims.

The mission has been revealed as our security services have been forced to admit they are struggling to keep track of the estimated 500 Britons who have travelled to the Middle East to fight alongside the Islamic Isis forces in Syria and Iraq.

[source : Obama sends CIA to UK to probe terrorist 'breeding ground': President in pointed snub to MI5 over 'lone wolf' mission to interrogate British security experts, Mail on Sunday,, 28th June 2014]

And who can blame Obama?

The butcher of Lee Rigby, Michael Adebalajo, was being harassed by MI5 to become a spy for them. He refused. But during this time Adebalajo was preaching Jihad on the streets of London, pleading with young Muslims to go to Syria to fight Jihad against President Bashar al Assad of Syria. Adebalajo was talking about going there himself. And right underneath the noses of MI5.

And in 2009 the former French foreign minister Roland Dumas was asked by nice Great Britain to smuggle Jihadis into Syria.

This is because it is current British foreign policy to oust Assad.

And I believe that this is directly linked to the plan for totaler krieg on seven nations in five years as revealed to General Wesley Clark shortly after the inside Ziojob 9/11.

This is yet another indication that Obama is not totally controlled, as I had pointed out before it was revealed by the leaked agenda for Bilderberg that they are not happy with his foreign policy.


As an indication as to the kind of sleep I can get when not being zapped, I had six hours of unbroken sleep last night, and I feel completely different to yesterday. I have not had that kind of sleep since last September when after a cycle ride I had 5 hours of unbroken sleep. A typical night of sleep for me is two or three spells of between 1 and 2 hours each, which in total sounds OK, but it is broken sleep. And this has been going on for well over a decade.

So if you're not being zapped, ask yourself, why?

Is it because you are not saying anything?

Or if you are saying something then what are you saying that they want you to keep saying? Or what are you not saying that they don't want you to say?

I'm going to make a long list of what I say in a blog today, and see what you agree or disagree with.

Saturday, June 28, 2014


I went to London today.

I was shattered and anti social from lack of sleep due to being zapped, but I still went. In fact, I was that shattered that while slicing some bread for my breakfast toast I cut my hand, that soft patch between my left wrist and my thumb. It took an hour for the bleeding to stop. But I still went to London, trying but failing to sleep most of the journey.

I was looking forward to it since last weekend. I prepared some leaflets. Even bought a megaphone intending to shout down Freemason's Hall.

I got there at 1055...but nobody was there. Three teenage lads were on the door steps of Freemasons Hall, but they could have been cutthroat Jihadis for all I know, and being on my own I wasn't going to risk anything. And the spot I had identified for the protest across the street from the Hall was occupied by a large black cabin for mascara/tanning!

So I walked to Covent Garden, and back.

Still nobody there.

So I walked around the area again, passed the hall. Still nobody there.

So I walked to Covent Garden, distributed some leaflets, then back to the hall.

Still nobody there.

I walked past the hall about 8 times between 1100 and 1130. Nobody there.

I walked through Covent Garden again distributing more leaflets, then back to the hall. Still nobody there.

So I bought a sandwich and walked along the Thames, ate my sandwich, walked towards The Marsten House, distributing a few more leaflets along the way.

I then walked to Buckingham Palace to wave to Liz, then down The Mall, through Admiralty Arch, to find...A MASSIVE EVENT ON GAY PRIDE IN TRAFALGAR SQUARE!!

And not only Trafalgar Square, The Strand and Whitehall were blocked to traffic for a gay pride march.

I immediately decided to make a sharp exit and go home. I was alone, shattered, disillusioned and demoralised.

So what happened in London today was that a protest exposing the Freemasonic role in WW1 was not attended by anyone, but a massive gay pride event that shut down Trafalgar Square, Whitehall and The Strand, celebrating blokes sticking their cocks up other bloke's arses, shut down central London to wildly gay cheers!

I can just see it: when the LGBT element are told that King Edward VII engineered WW1, they boo. But when told that King Edward VII was bisexual, that same LGBT element would no doubt cheer Edward!!

This is one (literally) fucked up nation, obsessed with sex and blokes sticking their cocks up other blokes arses while not giving a fuck about the true origin and purpose of World War 1.

And again, I challenge anyone to write what I write and see what happens. I would love to see how you handle just one night of what I go through when I get zapped. It saps your energy, enthusiasm and confidence.

Today it was just me, on my own, absolutely cream crackered from being zapped, versus not only Freenasonry, but also the police, the system and their electromagnetic weapons.

So stuff I learned today:
1. very few people read this blog, or if not then they can't be bothered except to click their mouse, or there isn't the PR or street cred yet;
2. nice Great Britain is much more concerned with sex and blokes sticking their cocks up other blokes arses than the Freemasonic origins of WW1, which was engineered by the bisexual King Edward VII;
3. I'm on my own.

Update : 9pm on a Saturday and I'm off to bed.


The eidtorial in The Guardian is on the assassination of Arch Duke Ferdinand.

But guess what?

Yep. No mention of Freemasonry.

Here it is in full (but published late yesterday):
What if that bullet had missed Franz Ferdinand's heart tomorrow? What, for that matter, if the ice-pick had done for Stalin, not Trotsky? What if Gordon Brown had called his election in 2007? Like futile fantasies of going all-out at Scrabble, by deploying just one different letter from those you've actually got, such counterfactuals miss the point. Proper historians are snobby about the pulp re-rendering of the past they generate. Philosophers have no such qualms. It was Leibniz who introduced the idea that many possible worlds existed in the mind of God, and it has taken philosophers down the rabbit hole ever since. Voltaire attacked the notion in Candide, satirising Dr Pangloss for defending the world as we know it as "the best of all possible worlds". But even shorn of the God bit, possible worlds remained a surprisingly rich seam. In the 20th century, Saul Kripke used them to develop a new language about logical necessity: a statement is said to be possible if it is true in at least one possible world, and necessary if it is true in all possible worlds. Others, such as David Lewis, argued for a more Doctor Who-like option, that possible worlds exist as real alternative realities. This is known in the trade as modal realism. But so what? Somewhere, out there, there may be a possible world in which the first world war never started, where the bullet missed. Or maybe the bullet missed and the war still happened. These worlds may not be unthinkable. But that's about all that can be said for them.

[source : Unthinkable? What-if worlds, Editorial, The Guardian,, 27th June 2014]

We should add one more 'What if?': What if Freemasonry was banned?

Oh, what a wonderful world this would be.


World War One was decades in the making.

Grand Master of the United Grand Lodge of England engineered the Triple Entente to bring nice Great Britain out of 'splendid isolation' and ally with France and Russia to encircle Germany in war under the correct conditions. Edward's protege Sir Edward Grey completed the task.

Freemasonry (nice chaps) had condemned Arch Duke Ferdinand to death...AND HE KNEW IT!!

And the assassins of Arch Duke Ferdinand admitted at their trial that they were Freemasons, had received the material and encouragement for the assassination from foreign Freemasons, and knew that Freemasonry had condemned Ferdinand to death.

And after the war Kaiser Wilhelm II, who had been told by King George V that nice Great Britain would stay out of any war thus encouraging, mobilisation, wrote in his memoirs that he was told by a distinguished Freemason that Freemasonry had engineered the war to create a power vacuum in Central Europe.

That vacuum was filled by The League of Nations, The first Secretary General of The League of Nations was James Eric Drummond, 16th Earl of Perth, who was a protege of Sir Edward Grey. It was Grey who misrepresented nice Great Britain's position to multiple parties, showed little concern over Belgium (Lloyd George accused Grey starting WW1 by not drawing a line at Belgium) but as soon as Germany invaded Belgium it was Grey who shouted that little Belgium must be defended, citing the 1839 Treaty of London which nice Great Britain was not legally bound to enforce unilaterally.

And it was Grey who first proposed The League of Nations in a letter to his co-conspirator Colonel House, the controller of the racist idiot Woodrow Wilson.


It was the British Empire and Freemasonry wot dunnit.

It is guaranteed that not one NATO media will mention this.

And highly probable that the rest will ignore this damning evidence.

But why engineer all the slaughter in the trenches? All the drownings in the Atlantic Ocean?

Because the brutal pro-slavery British Empire was crumbling as Germany, Russia and a long list of other nations were cooperating to implement The American System of Economics and building land-based trade routes beyond the control of the British Navy.

So, as described in the following video, the British were losing badly so they kicked over the chess board like a little spoiled petulant child. But the result was that millions died, Europe was destroyed and we got the first attempt at world government, which was controlled by the British Empire through Grey's protege Drummond.

And when Grey, as British Ambassador to the USA, couldn't persuade the USA to join the League of Nations, Wall Street created both Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia, for a much longer and bloodier world war, one in which the USA would be embroiled in from the start. World War 2 led to the USA not only joining but also hosting The United Nations.

So it could be argued that 100 years ago today BOTH WW1 and WW2 were kicked off by Freemasons assassinating Arch Duke Ferdinand after condemning him to death.

So today, 11am-ish, Freemasons Hall, Great Queen Street, London.

Be there or be square.

Friday, June 27, 2014


The UN Secretary General Ban Ki Moon has made a slightly respectable call for peace in Syria, making several veiled references to the illegal meddling by Saudi Arabia in the affairs of the sovereign state of Syria. However he makes no suggestion that the leaders of Saudi Arabia and other concerned nations be sent to The Hague for what they have done, and therefore shows tremendous bias which should contribute to him being relieved of his position.

The horrific war in Syria continues to worsen and bleed beyond its borders. A cold calculation seems to be taking hold: that little can be done except to arm the parties and watch the conflict rage.

...But the international community must not abandon the people of Syria and the region to never-ending waves of cruelty and crisis. The following six points can chart a principled and integrated way forward.

[source : Ban Ki Moon, Six vital steps to peace in Syria, The Guardian,, 26th June 2014]

You see, most people are unaware of the decision reached in 2007 that Saudi Arabia would unleash cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria. This decision was taken after Saudi Arabia had supplied the patsies for the inside job 9/11, which was supposed to kick off a series of wars in North Africa and The Middle East to extinguish resistance to the NATO/Zionist occupation and resource-grabbing.

However, things didn't go to plan. By 2007 seven nations were supposed to have seen war and regime change, but only Iraq had seen both of these.

So what Ban Ki Moon is doing is isolating the conflict in Syria as if it is a one-off, when in fact the conflict in Syria is one in a series of conflicts agreed decades ago in the corridors of London, Tel Aviv, Washington and Brussels.

But still, Ban's six points do make several references to external meddling, but do not recognise that Syria as a sovereign state is under attack in a covert war.

Point 1: Ending the Violence
It is irresponsible for foreign powers to give continued military support to parties in Syria that are committing atrocities and flagrantly violating fundamental principles of human rights and international law. I have urged the United Nations security council to impose an arms embargo. The sides will have to sit across from each other again at the negotiating table. How many more people must die before they get there?

This is point 1, and therefore reasonable to assume that this is the most important point. Ban is very direct in his reference to foreign powers "flagrantly violating fundamental principles of human rights and international law".

However in Point 4 he makes no reference to bringing these foreign powers to justice, and instead laments the recently defeated resolution that called for Assad to be brought before the ICC, as if Assad had started all the violence when all he ks doing is defending his sovereign country from foreign invaders...and with the backing of the vast majority of Syrians!!
Point 4: Ensuring accountability for serious crimes
Last month, a resolution that aimed to refer the conflict to the international criminal court failed to pass the security council. I ask those member states that say no to the ICC, but say they support accountability in Syria, to come forward with credible alternatives. The Syrian people have a right to justice and action against impunity.

In Point 5 Ban praises the destruction of Syria's chemical weapons, but like The Guardian he makes no reference to destroying Israel's much more powerful, horrific and destructive arsenal of WMDs.
Point 5: Finishing the destruction of chemical weapons in Syria
The UN and the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons have worked together to destroy or remove from the country all of the declared materials in a once large arsenal. Many member states have provided critical resources and support for this challenging task, which was undertaken in an active war zone and which will now be completed at various destruction facilities outside Syria. While almost all of the killing in Syria is being done with conventional weapons, it has been essential to reinforce the global norm banishing the production and use of chemical weapons.

Ban then regains some sense of neutrality and sanity by again referring to the growing threat of terrorism in Syria, calling for religious and political leaders in the region to refrain from escalating the spiral of violence.
Point 6: Addressing the regional dimensions of the conflict, including the extremist threat
Foreign fighters are in action on both sides, increasing the level of violence and exacerbating sectarian hatreds. While we should not blindly accept the Syrian government's demonisation of all the opposition as terrorists, neither should we be blinded to the real threat of terrorists in Syria. The world must come together to eliminate funding and other support for Jabhat al-Nusra and the Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham. The latter is also a threat to all communities in Iraq. It is crucial for the region's leaders, political and religious, to call for restraint and to avoid a spiral of attack and reprisal.

I assume that this reference to "Foreign fighters are in action on both sides, increasing the level of violence and exacerbating sectarian hatreds" is in reference to Hezbollah. If so then this again shows Ban's lack of respect for a sovereign state, and explains why he is Sec Gen of the UN, an organisation formed from two engineered world wars for the purpose of creating a world government.

Let's get this straight. Syria is a sovereign nation. Syria is under attack. It can ask for help from whoever it wants. It is not up to Ban Ki Moon to say who it can and cannot ask for help, It is not up to the USA either. Nor Great Britain. Nor Israel. Nor NATO. Nor Saudi Arabia. Nor any of the other Friends of Syrian Terrorists like Qatar.

And the same goes for Iraq. If Iraq wants help from Syria and Russia to destroy terrorists with no strings attached then that is Iraq's decision. Not America's.

However, if Obama wants to fund cutthroat Jihadis with a half billion dollars then he must live with that decision when he, not Assad or Putin, is brought to the ICC.


MI6 chief John Sawers was at Bilderberg a few weeks ago.

He has now resigned.

But look very closely at how The Daily Mail has described Sawers' tenure as head of MI6.
The Foreign Office is searching for a new spy chief after it was announced Sir John Sawers, the head of MI6, is stepping down.

The boss of Britain's overseas intelligence services – traditionally known as ‘C’ – will leave the post in November after five years.

Sir John – often compared to James Bond for his suave manner and good looks – had tried to lift the veil of secrecy surrounding MI6 and was its first head to give a public speech.

[source : Search for the new 'C' as MI6 chief steps down: Sir John Sawers to leave post in November after five years in charge, The Daily Mail,, 27th June 2014]

I have highlighted the most significant section.

"tried to lift the veil of secrecy".

And what better way to lift the veil of secrecy than to have some of your spying methods plastered all over the newspapers for months but divert all the resulting scandal onto a 'whistleblower', who then 'escapes' to Russia, and who you then accuse of 'aiding the enemy' in front of a coven of besotted, lovestruck MPs while your sister organisation MI5 encourages British Muslims to go to Syria to fight Jihad alongside 'the enemy', and for those British Jihadis to then return to nice Great Britain giving you and your mates the perfect opportunity to call for more surveillance power?

Or am I just being cynical and conspiratorial?

No. I am not. This makes much more sense. It explains why Snowden was all over the NATO media flag ship The Guardian for months telling us what some of us knew in 1999!!!

Thursday, June 26, 2014


You could not make this stuff up #739679324

The White House has warned Syria against cross-border airstrikes in Iraq to target Takfiri militants controlling large areas of both countries.

[source : US warns Syria against Iraq intervention, PressTV,, 26th June 2014]

The Obama administration asked Congress Thursday to authorize direct U.S. military training and equipment for Syrian opposition fighters, a move that could significantly escalate U.S. involvement in Syria’s civil war.

Money for the program would total $500 million and would expand a current CIA covert training program. It is included in a $65.8 billion request for Overseas Contingency Operations, or OCO, added to the fiscal year 2015 Defense Department budget.

[source : Obama asks for authorization to provide direct military training to Syrian rebels, Washington Post,, 26th June 2014]

So what is supposed to happen is that in Iraq, ISIS gain more power, arms, finance and personnel, and then turn on Syria where they will join with the 'moderate' Syrian opposition, blasting Assad with both barrels.


I just found out that Saturday 28th June is also Armed Forces Day.

Armed Forces Day will be on Saturday, 28 June 2014.

It's an opportunity to do two things. Firstly, to raise public awareness of the contribution made to our country by those who serve and have served in Her Majesty's Armed Forces, Secondly, it gives the nation an opportunity to Show Your Support for the men and women who make up the Armed Forces community: from currently serving troops to Service families and from veterans to cadets.

Across the country people are getting involved: communities hold local events and business show their support.

[source : About Armed Forces Day,, Accessed 26th June 2014]

What better way "to Show Your Support for the men and women who make up the Armed Forces community" than to protest the engineering of World War One by Freemasonry outside Freemasons Hall, Great Queen Street, London on Armed Forces Day, 28th June 2014.

Demand the immediate and safe return of all our boys and girls, including Special Forces, from all engineered and unnecessary wars and conflicts all across the globe in which The Brutish Empire is currently meddling: Syria; Iran; Iraq; Persian Gulf; Venezuela; Russia. Anywhere and everywhere.

28th June 2014
Freemasons Hall
Great Queen Street, London


Be there or be square.

There are Armed Forces Day events at Battersea and Greenwich.


I got zapped last night. Not as bad as on some occasions, but still significant.

I half expected it anyway. There has been an increase in the number of visits to SATELLITE TERRORISM, which I also half expected. The cowards like their psychoterrorism.

So just a warning. They may be trying to reduce my vibrational frequency, for obvious reasons.


Would you describe this as an ordinary family home?

Can you find houses like these in the working class areas of Accrington, Leeds, Liverpool, Birmingham, Bristol, Southampton, or Basildon?

Perhaps the word 'Palace' gives us a clue?

Yet this is how a Royal aide described Kensington Palace following the release of the accounts of Buckingham Palace for last year, which can be found at .

Earlier this year Prince Charles went on a hastily arranged jaunt to Saudi Arabia, sponsors of the cutthroat Jihadis in Syria who have been slitting the throats of defenceless Syrian children, eating the hearts of their prisoners and tried unsuccessfully to pull a fast one last August claiming that Assad had used chemical weapons to kill over a thousand Syrian civilians when they stood to benefit from overt large scale military intervention from NATO.

How much did that trip cost? AT LEAST A QUARTER OF A MILLION POUNDS!!

But in general, there has been an increase of approximately 7% in expenditure by the Royal family since the last set of accounts.

Not bad, eh, for someone with a grandfather who tricked Germany into war by stating that Great Britain would stay neutral in World War 1, a great grandfather who as Grand Master of the United Grand Lodge of England engineered World War 1 through The Triple Entente, and an uncle who was forced to abdicate because he was a bona fide Nazi.

Wednesday, June 25, 2014


Below is the leaflet for Saturday.

This is side 1:

This is side 2:

On an A4, place 2 copies of side 1 on Page 1, and 2 copies of side 2 on Page 2, print on both sides and cut in half, giving two leaflets.

I'm aiming to get there for between 11am and midday, depending on public transport.

Bring a brolly...and a happy face!

I want this to be peaceful and fun but above all educational, not plagued by agents provocateur (who no doubt will be there), or clashes with the police.


Sack Blair now.

Blair represents the Bilderberg War Party.

While Israel killed 1500 people in Gaza in late 2008/early 2009 after Israel engineered a provocation that it then used to attack Gaza, Tony Blair was sat watching the death and destruction, through the illegal use of phosphorous and God knows what else, on his TV while quaffing another glass of the finest Chianti with his feet up.

Blair has put his private empire before peace in the Middle East.

Blair also advises The Bona Fide Bank of Satan, JP Morgan, who his son also works for.

Here is the open letter calling for the Sacking of Tony Blair:
This Friday, 27 June, will mark the seven-year anniversary of Tony Blair's appointment as the Quartet representative to the Middle East. We, the undersigned, urge you to remove him with immediate effect as a result of his poor performance in the role, and his legacy in the region as a whole.

We, like many, are appalled by Iraq's descent into a sectarian conflict that threatens its very existence as a nation, as well as the security of its neighbours. We are also dismayed, however, at Tony Blair's recent attempts to absolve himself of any responsibility for the current crisis by isolating it from the legacy of the Iraq war.

In reality, the invasion and occupation of Iraq had been a disaster long before the recent gains made by the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria. The sectarian conflict responsible for much of the war's reprehensible human cost was caused in part by the occupying forces' division of the country's political system along sectarian lines.

In order to justify the invasion, Tony Blair misled the British people by claiming that Saddam Hussein had links to al-Qaida. In the wake of recent events it is a cruel irony for the people of Iraq that perhaps the invasion's most enduring legacy has been the rise of fundamentalist terrorism in a land where none existed previously.

We believe that Mr Blair, as a vociferous advocate of the invasion, must accept a degree of responsibility for its consequences.

The occupied Palestinian territories represent another tragic failure of western engagement in the Middle East.

It is our view that, after seven years, Mr Blair's achievements as envoy are negligible, even within his narrow mandate of promoting Palestinian economic development. Furthermore, the impression of activity created by his high-profile appointment has hindered genuine progress towards a lasting peace.

Seven years on there are still over 500 checkpoints and roadblocks in the West Bank. The Gaza Strip, severely damaged by Israel's 2009 bombing, remains in a humanitarian crisis, with 80% of its population reliant on foreign aid for survival. Israel continues to build settlements that are illegal under international law. According to the Palestinian Authority's former chief negotiator, Nabil Shaath, Tony Blair has "achieved so very little because of his gross efforts to please the Israelis."

It is also our view that Tony Blair's conduct in his private pursuits also calls into question his suitability for the role. Mr Blair has been widely criticised for a lack of transparency in the way he organises his business dealings and personal finances, and for blurring the lines between his public position as envoy and his private roles at Tony Blair Associates and the investment bank JPMorgan Chase.

With the current impasse in negotiations, it is time to rethink international engagement on the Israel-Palestine question. Alongside our call for you to remove Tony Blair as the Quartet special envoy, we are urging members of the public who feel the same way to sign the petition via the campaign website,

[source : An appeal to the Quartet on the Middle East to sack Tony Blair, The Guardian,, 24th June 2014]

Tuesday, June 24, 2014


This is what Theresa May, the Home Secretary, said today in a speech at The Mansion House:
"The real problem is not that we have built an over-mighty state but that the state is finding it harder to fulfil its most basic duty, which is to protect the public. That is why I have said before and go on saying that we need to make changes to the law to maintain the capabilities we need."

[source : Home secretary denies security services engaged in mass surveillance, The Guardian,, 24th Jun 2014]

The Guardian report, as of 2120 24th June 2014, does not mention May referring to Syria or Iraq.

However, a BBC report does:
"Considerable" threats to UK security were developing with the emergence of militant group Isis, the collapse of Syria, the activities of Boko Haram in Nigeria, and the "expanding scope" of cyber crime, the home secretary said.

[source : Theresa May: There is no surveillance state, BBC,, 24th June 2014]

Last year the three stooges, the heads of MI5, MI6 and GCHQ, sat before a coven of lovestruck, besotted MPs and some how kept their faces straight as they sobbed, lower lips quivering, that Ed Snowden had aided the enemy al Qaeda.

But for decades London has been known as Londonistan because of The Covenant of Security that MI5 had with Islamic terrorists who based their HQs in London beyond arrest by the foreign governments. Osama bin Laden lived in Wembley, and when several countries offered to hand him over we rejected the offer. He went on to allegedly do 9/11, but that's for another time.

But last year this Faustian pact was horrifically exposed when Michael Adebalajo butchered Lee Rigby to death. At the time Adebalajo was under surveillance by MI5 and was being harassed by them into becoming a spy for them, while they allowed Adebalajo to preach Jihad against President Assad of Syria. In 2009 the former French foreign minister Roland Dumas was asked by Great Britain to smuggle Jihadis into Syria. This was part of The Redirection reported by Seymour Hersh in which the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia had agreed to unleash cutthroat Jihadis onto several nations that had been named to General Wesley Clark shortly after 9/11. So Adebalajo's role was to help to create a constant supply of willing recruits for the Jihadi pipeline into Syria that Dumas was asked to create, but someone else created instead.

But as we saw recently, the Syrian Jihadis have had their butts kicked in Syria and decided to invade Iraq where they have been executing en masse military personnel and civilians and enriching themselves by grabbing oil fields and military hardware.

And as reported in The Daily Telegraph just 2 days ago, this invasion was known of by NATO in February!!


So let's get this straight:
1. MI5 has had a Covenant of Security with the Islamic terrorists for decades;
2. MI5 have been allowing preachers such as Michael Adebalajo to preach Jihad against President Assad of Syria to create a constant supply of willing Jihadis to go to Syria and wage Jihad against President Assad;
3. But Assad has kicked their butts, so we let them invade Iraq instead, to pillage and execute en masse anything that moves;
4. And now those same Jihadis are being cited as the reason why the surveillance state needs to become more powerful and intrusive to 'protect' us!!

May is correct. The state is not fulfilling its most basic duty in protecting us. The state is deliberately creating the monsters we are supposed to be scared of and seek protection from the state.


In December 2010 baking hot Qatar was mysteriously selected to host The World Cup 2022.

And yes, that's the same Qatar that is a peninsula in The Persian Gulf bordering Saudi Arabia, with a daily mean temperature of approximately 35 degrees celsius.

And yes, that's the same Qatar that is financing NATO's cutthroat Jihad.

And yes, that's the same Qatar that is accused of using slave labour to build its national infrastructure as well as that for The World Cup.

Monday, June 23, 2014


Rothschild Russia Today has been repeating what occured this time last year.

And this time last year was the escape of Ed Snowden from the evil clutches of the CIA and NSA.

This time last year was a weird time for me. I was possessed by an intense interest in the Baring family and their interaction with the United States of America, which throws up a hell of a lot of very difficult questions. For example, despite them running the British East India Company, they continued to finance the USA at crucial times when there was war between the USA and Great Britain or its proxies, e.g. the Confederacy.

I was also starting to realise a few other things...

But before Snowden's miraculous escape, he had been headline front page news on the NATO media flag ship, The Guardian.

And after his miraculous escape he continued to appear as headline front page news on the NATO media flag ship, The Guardian.

And yes, that's the same NATO media flag ship The Guardian that:
1. immediately and consistently accused Assad of the horrific events at Ghouta;
2. cried with joy at Syria relinquishing its chemical weapons while not referring once to Israel's much more powerful and destructive arsenal of not only chemical but also biological and nuclear weapons;
3. demanded (and I assume much to the joy of Owen Jones) that NATO become the air force of the army of cutthroat Jihadis unleashed onto Libya as part of The Redirection reported by Seymour Hersh in 2007;
4. portayed the recent violent NATO-sponsored neo-Nazi coup in Ukraine as a bloodless romantic uprising of downtrodden Ukrainians under a Russophile tyranny, when since the coup Ukraine is being signed over to the IMF/Bohemian Grove/Wall Street crowd as the neo Nazis burn people alive, shooting at those escaping the flames and beating to death others who survived the jump from the 3rd floor windows;
5. supported Rothschild gimp and convicted embezzler Mikhail Khordokovsky by publishing an editorial under his name;
6. refuses to expose the plan for totaler krieg on seven nations in five years that was revealed to General Wesley Clark shortly after the inside job 9/11 despite many readers referring to it in comments.

And this is just the tip of the iceberg.

So forgive my scepticism of Snowden's 'revelations'.

As Abby Martin recently stated, Snowden was so USA! USA! USA! John Wayned-gung ho that he was prepared to go to Iraq and slaughter Iraqi civilians because of 9/11. He has also called for whistleblowers to have their balls shot off. And he also appears to be a 9/11 gatekeeper.

Yet when he suddenly decides to reveal that, surprise!!, we're all being spied on (sonething we have known for years due to Echelon being exposed in 1999), he is headline front page news on not only The Guardian but also The Bilderberg Washington Post!!

Who else has been given this fantastic opportunity to reveal the deepest, darkest secrets of the deep state?

David Icke? As I recall it, Icke appeared once in The Sun last year.

Alex Jones? Nope.

Webster Tarpley? Nope.

Lyndon Larouche? Nope.

Tony Gosling? Nope.

Not even Zac Rothschild Goldsmith MP got a sniff of the front page of The Guardian.

So we have to ask:
why would Snowden be allowed to reveal the NSA's deepest, darkest secrets (allegedly) on the front pages of The Guardian and The Washington Post, for weeks, while nobody who has some sort of clue as to what is going on is not even mentioned on the those front pages, not even to be ridiculed?

A week or two ago Russia Today held a Snowden Day, worshipping Snowden. Non stop Snowden. Relentless Snowden.

Yet the wars in the Middle East and North Africa could be stopped within months by RT showing the videos of General Wesley Clark stating the plan for totaler krieg.

Not one NATO media outlet that I am aware of has shown those videos.

A whole day devoted to the Clark revelations would stop the wars.

Instead we get a This Time Last Year..., dedicated to Snowden's escape.

It all seems such a farce, particularly when Greenwald is sitting on NSA bombshells but finds the time to sign lucrative contracts...


Israeli Air Force = ISIS Air Force

Israeli Defence Force = ISIS Defence Force

A 15 year old Israeli was apparently killed by a missile of some sort. Israel accused Syria, despite Syria having no reason whatsoever to do so, while the Syrian rebels, now armed with all sorts of weapons unwisely supplied by Obama, have several reasons: they hate Jews; doing so would give Israel an excuse to attack Syria.

And so it came to pass.

While Israel cannot say who is firing missiles at them, they attacked SAA positions.
Nine Syrian military targets have been hit by Israeli jets and guided missiles, the IDF says, claiming it was a decisive response to a series of cross-border shootings to protect the citizens of Israel.

...It was not clear who exactly fired the anti-tank missile that hit the Israeli border from an area contested by the Syrian army and the rebels.

[source : Israel strikes 9 military targets in Syria, RT,, 22nd June 2014]

This comes just as:
1. the OPCW announces that 100% of Syria's declared chemical weapons are now beyond its borders and therefore beyond its control;
2. ISIS is securing its gains from last week by taking border posts between Iraq and Syria.

By destroying SAA positions without knowing for sure that it was Syria and not a 3rd party or 4th party interested in stirring up trouble, Israel could be assisting ISIS in that the SAA may now move personnel to the Golan away from regions close to those controlled by ISIS.

But you can see it now: ISIS makes gains in Syria; there is alleged use of chemical weapons by the SAA to stop them; NATO intervenes.


This is an alternative reading list/statement of facts that provide slam dunk evidence that World War One was a bloody British Freemasonic conspiracy.

0. Nations such as Germany and Russia were implementing The American System of Economics of high tariffs on imports and national banking, and were collaborating with the USA, replacing the brutal British Empire as the dominant economic force of the world;

1. La France Conquise: Edouard VII et Clemenceau (with contributions from Dr Webster Tarpley et al) - describes how and why Edward VII, as Grand Master of the United Grand Lodge of England engineered the Triple Entente to bring Great Britain out of 'splendid isolation' and to isolate and surround Germany under the correct conditions;

2. How The British Crown Created the Balkan Powderkeg by Joseph Brewda - describes how the British created the Balkan Committee in 1903, each member of which was responsible for a nation in The Balkans, creating friction with the other Balkan nations;

3. It was widely known in Freemasonic circles that Ferdinand had been condemned to death by Freemasonry...and he knew it;

4. The transcripts of the trial of the assassins of Arch Duke Ferdinand - describe how the assassins were Freemasons, and received the material and encouragement for the assassination from foreign Freemasons, and how Ferdinand had been condemned to death by Freemasonry;

5. Kaiser Wilhelm's brother was told by King George V that Great Britain would not become involved in any war on the European mainland, thus encouraging mobilisation to war;

6. Rothschild cousin Bethmann-Hollweg gave Austria "blank cheque" support from Germany to pursue a military solution;

7. Sir Edward Grey misrepresented Britain's position to multiple parties, did not make Britain's position crystal clear, and contrary to King George V's statement, as soon as Germany invaded Belgium, Great Britain cited the obscure Treaty of London 1839 to defend Belgium's neutrality which Great Britain was not legally obliged to defend unilaterally. Grey was a protege of Edward VII and on the edge of the Rhodes/Milner circle of extreme British imperialists;

8. Memoirs of Kaiser Wilhelm II - describes how a distinguished German Freemason told Wilhelm that Freemasonry engineered WW1 to create a power vacuum in Central Europe, and provides evidence that the British had created secret stores of war material in Northern France close to the Belgian border MONTHS BEFORE the assassination of Ferdinand;

9. As described by Joachim Remak in Sarajevo : Political Murder, there is no conclusive proof that Apis ordered the assassination of Arch Duke Ferdinand (his 'confessions' are considered unreliable);

10. How Edward VII Started World War 1

Saturday 28th June 2014.
Freemasons Hall.
Great Queen Street, London.
Be there or be square.


While David Cameron, Tony Blair, Dick Cheney, General Petraeus and all the other members of the war crowd either demand large scale bombing of Iraq or terrify us through warnings of plots of attacks on the homeland because of the recent rise of ISIS in Iraq, very few are asking: who knew this was coming?

Tony Cartalucci recently highlighted Lebanon's The Daily Star reporting on the movement of ISIS in Syria to the border with Iraq in March.

But this invasion of Iraq by ISIS was known about months before this!!
MI6 and the CIA were handed intelligence outlining the planned takeover of northern Iraq by jihadists and their allies five months ago but the British and American governments failed to act on it, senior officials in Iraq have told The Telegraph.

The head of intelligence for the autonomous Kurdish regional government, which has links with the West, said he had repeatedly tried to send warnings both to the central government in Baghdad and to its allies, Britain and America.

But despite repeated attempts to impress on Washington and London the seriousness of the unfolding situation, he said there was no response from either government.

[source : Britain and US 'neglected alert to Iraq jihadist takeover’, The Daily Telegraph,, 22nd June 2014]


Last weekend The Butcher of Baghdad, Tony Blair, wrote an 'essay' on his website which claimed that he was not to blame for the new crisis in Iraq, that the war on Syria is to blame and that we should bomb everywhere in the whole wide world and employ his foundation to teach the world to love each other.

The FT has today allowed Blair to spew all over us again.

Blair once again blames the war in Syria.

We cannot ignore the fact that Isis, the jihadist group advancing across Iraq, rebuilt itself and organised the Iraq operation from the chaos in Syria. Isis and other al-Qaeda-type groups in Iraq were flat on their back four years ago, having been comprehensively beaten by a combination of US and UK forces and Sunni tribes. The civil war in Syria allowed them to get back on their feet.

[source : Tony Blair, Removing Saddam Hussein did not cause this crisis, FT,, 22nd June 2014]

This is absolutely true.

But Blair goes no further on this by not asking questions such as, why is there a war in Syria in the first place?

The war in Syria was foretold years before it occured in an article by Seymour Hersh entitled The Redirection published in New Yorker Magazine. Hersh stated that Israel, the USA and Saudi Arabia had reached an agreement to unleash cutthroat Jihadis onto Iran, Syria and Lebanon. However, Hersh did not state the role that this horrific decision played in the wider scheme of things.

As this blog has stated many, many times, shortly after the inside job 9/11 General Wesley Clark was told of a plan for totaler krieg on seven nations in five years. The seven nations were:

The war on Iraq started in 2003. So taking that as the start of this plan being implemented, four years later in 2007 just 2 of those nations had been attacked: Saddam Hussein was ousted; but in Lebanon Israel failed to destroy Hezbollah.

So by 2007 this plan was moribund.

Thus this Plan B of unleashing cutthroat Jihadis onto several nations named to Clark was executed.

The former French foreign minister Roland Dumas was asked by nice Great Britain to help to smuggle cutthroat Jihadis into Syria. And MI5 allowed extremist preachers such as Michael Adebalajo to preach Jihad against President Assad to create a constant supply of willing Jihadis to go to Syria, to join, fight and train alongside al Qaeda in Syria against Assad.

So what does Blair say about this? Blair laments the decision not to bomb Syria, but then cites these Adebalajo-inspired Jihadis as "a real threat to our national security".
So the first point is that non-intervention is also a decision with consequences. In the case of Syria those consequences have been dire, and as security chiefs in the UK and Europe are warning, they pose a real threat to our security.

Next, Blair addresses the Arab Spring as if it was bound to occur no matter what happened. But as shown above, Blair makes massive omissions.

The Arab Spring was not a guaranteed event. And when it did happen it happened with very significant assistance from the USA!!

So why would the USA engineer and sponsor The Arab Spring?

The Arab Spring occured in only a few countries : Tunisia and Egypt first, then Libya, then Syria.

Isn't it curious that The Arab Spring occured either side of Libya, and then in Libya, when Libya was one of the targets named to General Wesley Clark?

In Libya the 'peaceful protestors' were actually veterans of the war against the USA in Iraq. They were members of or linked to al Qaeda and other Islamic extremist organisations...AND GADDAFI WAS GIVING THEIR NAMES TO MI6 AND CIA! But The Arab Spring allowed NATO media and politicians to refer to al Qaeda as 'freedom fighters'. NATO became their air force. British Special Forces assisted them on the ground. What was initially a UN resolution to protect civilians turned into a campaign to Get-Gaddafi-at-all-costs.

And after that, Syria.

The same thing happened in Syria as in Libya. International cutthroat Jihadis financed by Saudi Arabia have been wreaking havoc in Syria, slitting the throats of defenceless Syrian children, eating the hearts of their prisoners, and pulling a fast one through a false flag event designed to provoke a large scale military intervention on their behalf by NATO.

So what does Blair say of these cutthroat Jihadis?
The reason we got into such difficulty in Iraq, as in Afghanistan, was precisely because once the dictatorship was removed, extremist Islamist forces then made progress extraordinarily difficult. That is their hideous impact the world over. The fundamental challenge today arises not from the decisions of 2003 or those of 2014. It is the challenge of Islamist extremism and it is global.

Again, no mention that the rise of Islamic extremism was first nurtured in Londonistan through the Covenant of Security, nor more recently through The Redirection in which Saudi Arabia would finance and unleash a new wave of cutthroat Jihadis to destroy a handful of nations named to General Wesley Clark.

So what is Blair's solution?
Short term, we have to do what we can to rescue the situation in Iraq and Syria. In Iraq, without inclusive government this will be hard to do. The US is right in demanding political change as the price of its engagement. In Syria, an outright win for either side is no longer sensible; the majority of Syrians just want the torment to end.

Long term, we have to have the right mixture of soft and hard power responses, which fights this extremism wherever it is conducting its terror campaigns. We must deal with the root cause of the problem which lies in the formal and informal systems that educate young people in a closed-minded approach to religion and culture.

Nothing too specific there, but there is a call to stop the radical education of young people. If this means shutting down Saudi Arabia's global influence then very few would disagree.

However, due to the total lack of truth in this latest dollop of Blair bullshit, we cannot believe that there is any sincerity behind the words.

But what else can you expect from the FT, the mouthpiece of The City of London?

We need a UN resolution to protect us from Tony Blair's lies, half-truths, omissions and distortions.

ps There has been no Arab Spring in Saudi Arabia, but there has been an Arab Spring in nations named to General Wesley Clark leading to calls for military intervention.

Sunday, June 22, 2014


The last verse of this song should inspire you into protesting next Saturday outside Freemasons Hall.

And I can't help but wonder oh Willy McBride
Do all those who lie here know why they died
Did you really believe them when they told you the cause
Did you really believe that this war would end wars
Well the suffering, the sorrow, the glory, the shame
The killing and dying it was all done in vain
Oh Willy McBride it all happened again
And again, and again, and again, and again

The Green Fields Of France - The Fureys

"The Green Fields Of France"
(originally by Eric Bogle)

Oh how do you do, young Willy McBride
Do you mind if I sit here down by your graveside
And rest for a while in the warm summer sun
I've been walking all day, and I'm nearly done
And I see by your gravestone you were only nineteen
When you joined the great fallen in 1916
Well I hope you died quick
And I hope you died clean
Or Willy McBride, was it slow and obscene

Did they beat the drums slowly
Did they play the fife lowly
Did they sound the death march as they lowered you down
Did the band play the last post and chorus
Did the pipes play the flowers of the forest

And did you leave a wife or a sweetheart behind
In some loyal heart is your memory enshrined
And though you died back in 1916
To that loyal heart you're forever nineteen
Or are you a stranger without even a name
Forever enshrined behind some old glass pane
In an old photograph torn, tattered, and stained
And faded to yellow in a brown leather frame

Did they beat the drums slowly
Did they play the fife lowly
Did they sound the death march as they lowered you down
Did the band play the last post and chorus
Did the pipes play the flowers of the forest

The sun shining down on these green fields of France
The warm wind blows gently and the red poppies dance
The trenches have vanished long under the plow
No gas, no barbed wire, no guns firing now
But here in this graveyard that's still no mans land
The countless white crosses in mute witness stand
To man's blind indifference to his fellow man
And a whole generation were butchered and damned

Did they beat the drums slowly
Did they play the fife lowly
Did they sound the death march as they lowered you down
Did the band play the last post and chorus
Did the pipes play the flowers of the forest

And I can't help but wonder oh Willy McBride
Do all those who lie here know why they died
Did you really believe them when they told you the cause
Did you really believe that this war would end wars
Well the suffering, the sorrow, the glory, the shame
The killing and dying it was all done in vain
Oh Willy McBride it all happened again
And again, and again, and again, and again

Did they beat the drums slowly
Did they play the fife lowly
Did they sound the death march as they lowered you down
Did the band play the last post and chorus
Did the pipes play the flowers of the forest

Saturday, June 21, 2014


Next Saturday, 28th June 2014 is the 100th anniversary of the assassination of Arch Duke Ferdinand of Austria-Hungary. This assassination was the spark that eventually ignited World War One.

But the NATO media, and even Stop The War, would have you believe that the war was going to happen anyway, because it was all down to competing empires; British, Russian, German, French, Austrian.

But what the NATO media, and even Russian media, ignore is that the American System of Economics was being implemented by Germany and Russia, leading to Germany with the USA surpassing nice Great Britain, with its brutally surpressed empire, as the industrial superpowers of the 19th Century.

In late 19th Century, Prince Edward, later King Edward VII, as Grand Master of the United Grand Lodge of England, began to arrange the Triple Entente, to bring nice Great Britain out of 'splendid isolation'.

The assassins of Arch Duke Ferdinand were Freemasons. They admitted it at their trial. They also admitted to receiving not only the material but also encouragement from Freemasons abroad for the assassination.

And after the war Kaiser Wilhelm II wrote in his memoirs that he was told by a distinguished German Freemason that World War One was engineered by Freemasonry to create a power vacuum in Central Europe.

According to Christian Rakovsky, this vacuum was supposed to be filled by Trotsky. But we got The League of Nations instead.

Wilhelm was also told that it was Grand Orient Freemasonry that assassinated Arch Duke Ferdinand.

However,the assassins of Arch Duke Ferdinand were also members of Young Bosnia, and it was British Intelligence agent and Grand Master of Grand Orient Freemasonry, Giuseppe Mazzini who organised all the Young movevments of the day to destabilise any empire, except the British empire, by demanding independence.

And nice Great Britain had created The Balkan Commmittee to engineer mayhem in the Balkans.

So even though it was allegedly Grand Orient Freemasonry that assassinated Arch Duke Ferdinand, there is still enough evidence to implicate UGLE and the British Empire in the assassination of Ferdinand, the aim of which was to destroy Europe.

WW1 : Cui bono? The British Empire.

Therefore, next Saturday, on 28th June 2014, you should join me in a protest outside Freemasons Hall in Great Queen Street, London.

Times to be given later this week.

So be there or be square.


There was no reset.

Just another false alarm.

The very surprising and extremely disappointing ostracism continues, for whatever reason...

Friday, June 20, 2014


How Edward VII Started World War 1 - Webster Tarpley in 1995


I have always been very suspicious of NATO media when in the past it has shown photos or videos of Jihadis, some even wearing North Face coats!

But today the whole lot is really, really, really taking the limeade!!

ISIS, the Jihadi organisation which has recently released videos of themselves apparently executing en masse Iraqi soldiers and civilians, which stands accused of beheadings and crucifixions, and they were even cited by Der Fuhrer David "Call me Dave" Cameron in The Marsten House as planning to attack us here on the UK mainland, has released a video of British and Australian Jihadis discussing and advertising Jihad. Where and when the video was shot is up for debate because both Syria and Iraq are covered in sand yet the Jihadis are sat in lush green foliage.

But the extremely concerning aspect of this video is that nearly every single major NATO media outlet is reporting this as headline news!!
The Daily Mail
The Daily Mirror
The Independent
The Daily Telegraph

So far The Guardian does not appear to have reported on this video.

But my question is this:
why is the NATO media reporting on this video in fake shock and horror, while not reporting the videos of General Wesley Clark stating the plan for totaler krieg on seven nations in five years that has dominated the foreign policies of this nice Disunited Fascist Queendom, as well as that of the USA, since 9/11?

The answer is either gross professional misconduct, or encouraging cutthroat Jihad with displays of fake shock and horror.

And for the NATO media, here is General Wesley Clark:

And not only that: the timing of the release of this video is suspect, with President Obama so far resisting calls from The Bilderberg War Party to bomb, bomb, bomb Iraq (again and again and again).

Update :
Rothschild Russia Today is also reporting on this video having just dedicated a day to the Snowden 'revelations' while not dedicating a day to the Clark revelations, which I believe would stop the wars in the Middle East and North Africa. My strong view is that if you are reporting on this ISIS video while not reporting on the videos General Wesley Clark then you are encouraging cutthroat Jihad.


In an interview with The Daily Telegraph, the newspaper that championed war on Iraq in 2003, General David Petraeus said that Obama should bomb ISIS because it is a terrorist army that will threaten the UK and USA.

Petraeus represents the Bilderberg war party.

However, on the same webpage that this pro-war interview is reported in the DT, it is reported:
The American action came as Saudi Arabia warned the US and UK not to “meddle” in the “alarming situation”in Iraq and risk escalating it.

Writing in the Daily Telegraph, Prince Mohammed bin Nawaf Al Saud, the Saudi ambassador to the UK, said it would be“madness” and “beyond our comprehension” for the US to launch air strikes.

He said he “despaired” for the innocent families trapped in the conflict but that it was“Iraq’s problem” to sort out.

He wrote: “We also absolutely oppose all foreign intervention and interference.

“So the call by the Iraqi foreign minister for President Obama and the US government to launch air strikes against the Islamic State of Iraq and Al Sham (Isis) rebels is beyond our comprehension.

“An air strike will not just eliminate extremists – whom we do not support – but will effectively sign the death warrant of many Iraqi citizens, innocent families trapped and terrified by this crisis. “

Prince Mohammed also blamed the Iraqi leadership for creating the divisions between Sunni and Shia that has fuelled the crisis with an “unashamedly sectarian agenda”.

[source : US should launch targeted military strikes on 'terrorist army' Isis, says General David Petraeus, Daily Telegraph,, 19th June 2014]

This is a very interesting development.

Is there a factional split here?

And what will this mean for those unreleased 28 pages of the official 9/11 report that are believed to implicate Saudi Arabia?

Thursday, June 19, 2014


Dear Dave

I was very concerned at your statement during PMQs yesterday in The House of Commons, regarding Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIS), that:
"The people in that regime - as well as trying to take territory - are also planning to attack us here at home in the United Kingdom."

This concerned me because, at the time this statement was made, I was unaware of any public threat from ISIS regarding attacking the UK. And so was BBC correspondent Frank Gardner, who had to explain away your terrifying comment by writing:
There has been no public threat from ISIS of an attack against the UK and there are no details available of any actual attack planning by it.

However, it is perfectly plausible and there are bound to be things that the intelligence agencies pick up that they share with the National Security Council but not with us, the public.

But where has this threat of ISIS come from?

On 5th March 2007 Seymour Hersh reported in New Yorker Magazine in an article entitled The Redirection that Israel, the USA and Saudi Arabia had agreed to unleash cutthroat Jihadis onto nations such as Syria, Lebanon and Iran. It is my belief that this is due to the failure of Tony Blair and the so-called Neocons to implement their plan for war on seven nations in five years as revealed by a Pentagon officer to General Wesley Clark shortly after the truly horrific events of 11th September 2001. The seven nations named to Clark were:

We invaded Iraq in 2003 under the pretext that Iraq had WMDs and was also involved in 9/11. Both allegations were untrue.

Israel had a brief war with Hezbollah in Lebanon in 2006.

So by 2007 this plan was moribund. It was then that Hersh reported that Iran, Lebanon and Syria would suffer an invasion of cutthroat Jihadis.

However, the first nation to suffer these Jihadis was Libya in 2011. And by this time you were Prime Minister. The CIA and US State Department engineered The Arab Spring through The National Endowment for Democracy to give these Jihadis cover as 'freedom fighters', which was used by NATO to provide air cover for the Jihadis for them to eventually murder Colonel Gaddafi.

After Libya, the Jihadis moved onto Syria.

However, last year the former French foreign minister Roland Dumas revealed to French Parliament Channel LCP that he had been asked in 2009, two years before events in Syria, by British officials to smuggle Jihadis into Syria, an offer he apparently declined.

But more ominous is the horrific event in May last year when Lee Rigby was hacked to death by Michael Adebalajo. But what is even more ominous is that Adebalajo was under surveillance by MI5 at the time of the attack. And not only that, Adebalajo was allowed by MI5 to preach Jihad on the streets of London, begging Muslims to go to Syria to join the Jihad against President Assad of Syria, perhaps to provide recruits for the Jihadi pipeline that Roland Dumas was asked to establish. Estimates of the number of Britons waging Jihad in Syria against Assad vary but 400 seems to be a common estimate, but it may be higher. But one thing is for sure, you and your sidekick William Hague, and (not yet Sir) Andrew Parker will never tire of citing them as the greatest threat to national security.

So one wonders:
1. why was Adebalajo allowed to preach Jihad against Assad on the streets of London?
2. how many Muslims did Adebalajo inspire to go to Syria to fight Jihad against Assad?
3. how many of those are members of ISIS, and are now in Iraq?

There are mountains of reports on who created ISIS, who funds ISIS, who trains ISIS, etc, and they all point to our allies, Turkey, Saudi Arabia and the USA. So I seriously doubt that MI6 don't know.

However, you have been Prime Minister since May 2010. It is during this time that The Arab Spring kicked off in Syria, and with the evidence provided above, there is good reason to believe that it is British foreign policy to encourage British Jihadis to travel to Syria to oust President Assad, and reasonable to assume that some of these British Jihadis have joined ISIS, and are now in Iraq.

I therefore hold you, the head of MI5 and the head of MI6 responsible for any attack by any member of ISIS on a British citizen and/or on the British mainland.


Just when you thought it was safe to come out of the closet to declare that you love peace, the undead Dick Cheney is now attempting to resurrect the Neocons with a new organisation, called Alliance for a Strong America, that continues his attack in describing President Obama as the weakness in The White House.
We stand at a critical moment in the life of our nation. The policies of the last six years have left America diminished and weakened. Our enemies no longer fear us. Our allies no longer trust us. Empty threats, meaningless redlines, leading from behind, and “engagement” with rogue regimes have put America on a path of decline. Threats to America’s security are on the rise.

Al Qaeda is resurgent, establishing new safehavens across the Middle East, including in Iraq where President Obama withdrew all American forces with no stay behind agreement. He has announced he intends to do the same in Afghanistan. Syria has become the most dangerous training ground for Islamic terrorists since the attacks of 9/11. President Obama has repeatedly misled the American people about the attacks in Benghazi and the true nature of the threats we face.

[source : About The Alliance for a Strong America, The Alliance for a Strong America,, Accessed 19th June 2014]

Let's take some of the undead Cheney's points and totally destroy them, shall we?

1. Cheney says:
Al Qaeda is resurgent, establishing new safehavens across the Middle East, including in Iraq where President Obama withdrew all American forces with no stay behind agreement

Yes, al Qaeda is resurgent, but this is due to an agreement reached around 2006/7 in which Israel, the USA and Saudi Arabia agreed that the latter would unleash cutthroat Jihadis onto Iran, Lebanon and Syria. Now, it just so happens that these 3 were named to General Wesley Clark shortly after 9/11 as targets for war, even though no evidence had been shown of their culpability in 9/11. The seven nations named to Clark were the four named in A Clean Break, Iraq, Iran, Syria and Lebanon, together with Libya, Sudan and Somalia. These seven were supposed to have been and regime change in these seven nations in five years. But by 2007 only one, Iraq, had seen war and regime change, while Israel had engineered a war on Lebanon to get at Hezbollah but lost.

Clark accused Cheney, Wolfowitz and Rumsfeld of a foreign policy coup.

So by 2007 this plan of unleashing cutthroat Jihadis was hatched to inject some much needed life into their plan for totaler krieg. The cutthroat Jihadis were given cover as 'freedom fighters' by the CIA/State Department's fake Arab Spring, allowing NATO to be the Jihadi Air Force.

2. Cheney says:
Syria has become the most dangerous training ground for Islamic terrorists since the attacks of 9/11.

Yes, Syria has become a most dangerous training ground for Islamic terrorists. But this is due to the agreement described in point 1. above.

3. 9/11 was run by Saudi Arabia. This is why 28 pages of the report of the official investigation have been withheld.

4. If Saudi Arabia ran 9/11, and is financing the cutthroat Jihadis in Syria and Iraq, then "the true nature of the threats we face" comes from Saudi Arabia.

5. The war on Afghanistan was about pipelines and opium, not about hunting Osama bin Laden, who died from Marfan Syndrome in late 2001/early 2002, but the weakness in the Vice President's office didn't bother to tell us.

The Alliance for a Strong America lists the following as resources:
The Weekly Standard
The Heritage Foundation
The American enterprise Institute
The Institute for the Study of War (President and founder is Dr Kimberley Kagan, wife of Fred Kagan, brother of Robert Kagan, founder of PNAC)
Foreign Policy Initiative (Board of Directors includes Robert Kagan and William Kristol, i.e PNAC)

This truly is a resurrection of the dreamy Neocons and their dreams for totaler krieg.