Wednesday, March 30, 2016
I DON'T SUPPOSE THAT THE AYN RAND CULT OF SELFISH BOLTON MOMARCHY HAVE DELETED THOSE REPORTS I SENT IN GREAT FAITH AND TRUST?
Is Alex Jones not a Neo-Confederate?
Will David Icke refund all my donations?
Will The Libertarians/JBS ever realise that President Andrew Jackson was pure human scum?
And yes, I did actually purposely write "Momarchy".
So what, dear readers, can we deduce from this inaction:
1. they refuse to offer help;
2. they will not delete those reports.
What, dear readers.
Everyone and their goldfish know who he is now, and his empire.
Tuesday, March 29, 2016
HERE IS WHY THE GUARDIAN WERE SO KEEN TO PUBLISH THE SNOWDEN REVELATIONS BUT NOT THE PLAN FOR WAR AND REGIME CHANGE AFTER 9/11
I also thought that there was something very fishy about the conduits of those revelations: The Washington Post and The Guardian.
It was as if the Establishment wanted us to know that we were being spied on.
Now a study has found that knowing that the government is monitoring you can have a significant effect on your desire to express your opinion.
What was it that Glenn Greenwald said: Surveillance breeds conformity.
Government surveillance could be destroying free speech online https://t.co/3EPxotQOWf— The Independent (@Independent) 29 March 2016
They barely mention NATO, who ran Operation Gladio a few decades ago to terrorise Europe into shifting to the right politically.
Today NATO is running Operation Jihadio, a similar operation to Gladio but using Jihadis as a proxy force against Syria, but also to demonise ALL Muslims as terrorists and divert anger that should be directed at the criminal fraudulent bankers on to Muslims, and any domestic terror committed by the Jihadis can be used to strengthen the police state or for war.
The role of Infowhores in all this is to blame Islam for everything and barely mention the power structure that runs the Jihadis.
The WSWS is helping to expose Operation Jihadio:
Amid growing revelations of state foreknowledge of the March 22 attacks in Brussels, ruling circles are trying to cover up their responsibility in attacks that have now claimed 35 lives and left 340 injured. As the central role of Islamist networks developed by the NATO powers in their proxy war in Syria comes to light, Belgian and French politicians are stoking up anti-Muslim hatred.
Over the last week, it has emerged that Belgian intelligence had identified the attackers and their ties to Islamist militias fighting in Syria and had been warned of the timing and targets of their attacks. Nevertheless, police did not monitor the attackers or apprehend them as they amassed a huge bomb-making arsenal and took it to their targets. Information continues to emerge about how the backing of Islamist forces by Washington and its allies in Syria has produced a network of Islamist fighters in Europe enjoying a considerable level of complicity from the state.
[source : Officials stoke anti-Muslim hatred following Brussels attack, WSWS, http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2016/03/29/brus-m29.html, 29th March 2016]
Monday, March 28, 2016
Nothing could be further from the truth.
Here is David Knight reporting from outside Jackson's home The Hermitage.
Jackson, the People's President?
Knight mentions Jackson's forced removal of the native Americans, naming the Cherokee, and Jackson's opposition to secession.
But Knight fails to mention:
1. Jackson was a slaveholder, who at one point 'owned' 300 slaves, and who would have his runaway slaves beaten upon their return, and one slave called Gilbert actually died from his beating upon his recapture (though Jackson was shocked at the brutality of the beating administered to Gilbert by his overseer Ira Walton);
2. Jackson organised a raid on Negro Fort, which was basically on foreign soil, in order to recapture runaway slaves who had found sanctuary there, Jackson paying $50 for each captured slave who would be returned to their 'owners' for a price or sold at a market so that Jackson could make a profit;
3. a Cherokee saved Jackson's life, which prompted Jackson to declare eternal friendship between the Cherokee and the United States, but Jackson soon stabbed the Cherokee in the back by implementing the Indian Removal Act which resulted in The Trail of Tears and 4000 dead native Americans.
Watch the film 12 Years a Slave to gain an understanding of how Jackson's plantation The Hermitage probably worked. And then recall that Alex Jones' ancestors were colonels and generals in The Confederate Army fighting to protect the horrific institution of slavery.
This gives us a glimpse into the true Andrew Jackson: a slaveholding, slavebeating, slavery-loving backstabbing traitor.
But you will note that I have not provided any evidence of Jackson's treason yet, so I will now.
You should all read How Andrew Jackson Destroyed the United States by Michael Kirsch, in which Kirsch demolishes the myth that Jackson was the 'People's President'.
And then ask, why are The John Birch Society and The Libertarian Party pushing this myth of Andrew Jackson as some kind of saint, when Jackson was clearly a traitor involved in a plot to destroy The United States by destroying the institution that was financing the growth of The United States, The Second Bank of the United States?
And yes, there was an assassination attempt on Jackson's life, but the failed assassin, Richard Lawrence, was mentally ill:
1. Lawrence believed he was King Richard III of England;
2. Lawrence believed that Jackson had killed Lawrence's father;
3. Lawrence believed that the US government owed him money and that Jackson was stopping the US government from paying Lawrence.
So Lawrence, thinking that by assassinating Jackson he would finally get the money he believed he was owed and then begin his reign as King Richard III of England!!
A COMPLETE NUTTER!!
This suggestion that London bankers wanted Jackson dead because he had destroyed the BUS2 is total bollocks, and is used by the people covering up the real plot involving Jackson destroying BUS2 to reinforce their cover up.
Sunday, March 27, 2016
I'm beginning to understand more and more each day why Infowhores find Donald Trump so attractive.
But, Donald, isn't America putting America first already?
Be afraid. Be very afraid.
1. he is not threatening to withdraw from NATO. Far from it. He would honour Article V of The Washington Treaty;
2. He thinks the USA is not doing enough in Ukraine, but also that neighbours of Ukraine should also help. This shows just how ignorant he is of the whole NATO-used-Nazis-for-regime-change thing, which provoked the war in Ukraine and ultimately the MH17 disaster;
3. He thinks that the USA pays too much in to NATO and gets very little in return, and that a possible renegotiation of finances and duties is over due;
4. He also thinks that perhaps NATO should change its priorities to fighting terrorism because the foe that NATO was created to protect against, the USSR, is no longer there;
5. and that this would mean changing from a slow, cumbersome military to a rapid deployment force.
1. he believes that the only solution is a two-state solution;
2. he also believes that the Palestinians are the only ones who are violent;
3. he also believes that Israel has a right to exist.
On the US military:
1. he believes that the US military is weak;
2. and that nations should pay for the USA to have their bases on their soil;
3. and that nations should also pay 'protection money' (sounds like a Mafia Don speaking).
On the Middle East:
1. he would like to see the Gulf states invade Syria to take out ISIS;
2. he wants several safe zones in Syria;
3. he thinks Iran is the troublemaker and is taking over the oil in Iraq.
On his foreign policy team:
1. they are from a military background, not diplomatic (which does not bode well).
On surveillance and Snowden:
1. Trump believes that Snowden did "a great disservice" to expose the extent of intrusive spying by the NSA;
2. and that the level of spying and surveillance should be secret.
He is still very, very proud of his speech at AIPAC, and believes that America was great around the start of the 20th Century (which is why Great Britain engineered WW1 to destroy the American System of Economics), and shortly after WW2 (which Trump says America won, but Soviet Russia lost tens of millions fighting the Nazis while the USA lost about a half million).
The only thing he said about Putin was that Putin is a strong leader, but Trump had a real go at China at ripping off the USA through trade deals and currency devaluations.
He wants payments from nations for protection in order to repay the soon to be $21 trillion debt that the USA has.
But he also lied about his support for wars on Iraq and Libya: he still claims in the interveiws that he opposed those wars, but thet sad truth is that he supported them when they started, and only after they were over did he begin to express opposition to them.
I can see why the Establishment is concerned about him, but his foreign policy is not too different from theirs.
Or else what?
Or else she goes back to the USA!!
Yeah. Before she became the Ukraine Minister of Finance, Jaresko was a US citizen and a senior official at the US Embassy in Kiev, and before that she had handled (but somehow 'lost') funds for the CIA. That she 'lost' those CIA funds but gets a key job at the US Embassy in Kiev suggests she may be CIA.
And now here she is demanding that she become the next PM of Ukraine!!?
In a breathtaking display of headshaking ignorance of what is really going on in The Middle East, Trump has stated that he would consider stopping purchases of Saudi oil if...and get this...Saudi Arabia doesn't invade Syria to take out Daesh!!
AN EPIC, EPIC AND VERY DANGEROUS FAIL!!
WTF are he and Alex Jones discussing? Three months ago Trump appeared on Infowhores and Jones and Trump agreed that they would be speaking to each other a lot.
It is Saudi Arabia who unleashed the terrorists onto Syria in the first place! This was reported years before it happened by Seymour Hersh in an article entitled The Direction which was published in The New Yorker Magazine in March 2007.
Syria does not need Saudi troops on Syrian soil. Syria needs the USA to stop its support of Daesh and to force nations like Saudi Arabia to stop their support of Daesh too, and then to provide assistance (logistics, intelligence, weapons, etc) to Syria to defeat Daesh and then finance for the reconstruction of Syria.
Republican presidential front-runner Donald Trump has said he would consider stopping US oil purchases from Saudi Arabia and other Arab allies unless the Saudi government provide troops to fight Islamic State.
Trump made the comments in a lengthy foreign policy interview published by the New York Times on Saturday in response to a question about whether, if elected president, he would halt oil purchases from US allies unless they provided on-the-ground forces against Islamic State.
Hadley Freeman: in Donald Trump’s world, you’re classy or a loser. Which is he?
“The answer is, probably yes,” Trump said, according to a transcript.
[source : Trump tells NYT he would consider halting purchase of oil from Saudi Arabia, The Guardian, http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/mar/27/trump-would-consider-halting-purchase-of-oil-from-saudi-arabia, 27th March 2016]
Saturday, March 26, 2016
That's all folks!
1. they reported beforehand that the Chump and the GOP leadership were to meet before The Chump spoke at AIPAC;
2. David Knight was sent to report (and he argued with Tarpley outside AIPAC).
So why have Infowhores not reported on perhaps Donald Trump's most important speech?
They have reported on virtually everything that the ZioChump has stated beforehand, so why not the speech at AIPAC?
I'll tell you why.
Donald Trump is a fraud.
The Zionists at Infowhores now know this and are keeping their mouths shut (or they are ashamed at what Trump said or finally realising their own Zionism).
Rand believed in selfishness. Indeed, Rand once stated:
"Capitalism and altruism are incompatible"
Rand also supported Israel, even though Israel was created from terror and the forced removal of nearly one million Palestinians. She also believed that the forced removal of native Americans was a good thing, even though thousands died in the process, and it led to the creation of the Confederacy (of dunces). In both cases she compared the persecuted (Palestinians and native Americans) to savages and wild animals.
The politics of Infowhores is Libertarianism with a sprinkle of The John Birch Society.
Economically, Libertarianism stands for minimal government and the free market, i.e. dog-eat-dog with little protection derived from the state and law.
But as Webster Tarpley pointed out yesterday, Libertarianism favours the mega-corporations and the super-rich against an unorganised and splintered collection of tiny individuals with very few rights, or protection from law or from a trade union. An example of this the union-busting of The Koch Brothers, who fund Libertariansim, and whose father founded the rabidly anti-Communist John Birch Society.
This is not to promote Communism, but introduce some altruism into the politics of Infowhores.
Libertarianism is an economic hoax to drag in the power of the mega-corporations for it to be applied to the powerless, rightless individual.
Plain and simple.
Yes, there is freedom.
But it is freedom for the mega-corporations to exploit the working class via union-busting and zero hours contracts.
(See, Bolton Monarchy, I really am referring to Ayn Rand)
Today we have been witnessing Operation Jihadio.
Operation Jihadio involved using Islamic extremists for the following:
1. as a proxy force against President Bashar al-Assad of Syria;
2. as a reason for a stronger police state;
3. to deflect hatred of the bankers onto all Muslims.
Now the EU and Turkey are openly blaming each other for the Jihadis.
Turkish officials have accused European governments of attempting to export their Islamic extremist problem to Syria, saying the EU has failed to secure its own borders or abide by pledges to share intelligence and cooperate in fighting the jihadist threat.
The failures were outlined by Turkish officials to the Guardian through several documented instances of foreign fighters leaving Europe while travelling on passports registered on Interpol watchlists, arriving from European airports with luggage containing weapons and ammunition, and being freed after being deported from Turkey despite warnings that they have links to foreign fighter networks.
“We were suspicious that the reason they want these people to come is because they don’t want them in their own countries,” a senior Turkish security official told the Guardian. “I think they were so lazy and so unprepared and they kept postponing looking into this until it became chronic.”
[source : Turkish officials: Europe wanted to export extremists to Syria, The Guardian, http://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/mar/25/turkish-officials-europe-wanted-to-export-extremists-to-syria, 25th March 2016]
The truth is that they are ALL involved: the EU, Turkey, the USA, Israel, and the medieval Gulf states.
All are using Jihadis as a proxy force.
WE ARE WITNESSING OPERATION JIHADIO.
According to a report by Gilbert Dupont in Dernière Heure-Les Sports, widely taken up in other francophone newspapers, Belgian police were aware of Abdeslam’s location throughout. During four months when he was on the run, described by officials and the media internationally as Europe’s “most wanted man” due to his role in the November 13 attacks, elements in the police forces knew precisely where he was hiding in the Brussels area.
Dupont writes, “Our sources indicate a policeman in Malines had already given, in a December 7 report for the anti-terror section of the federal judicial police in Brussels, the address of 79, rue des Quatre Vents in Molenbeek where Salah Abdeslam was found last Friday. The confidential report (called a RIR, Rapport Informatief Rapport, in official jargon) was not transmitted. It was blocked and stayed stuck for three months at the Malines police.”
[source : Scandal mounts over failure by Belgian police to halt Brussels attacks, WSWS, http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2016/03/26/belg-m26.html, 26th March 2016]
Friday, March 25, 2016
I have been questioning how it is that Alex Jones has become the self-proclaimed leader of 'the resistance' and at 'the tip of the spear', with a multi-million dollar business and a mansion (with how many rooms sat on how many acres?) when his family is riddled with Confederates and CIA, and he is pushing the John Birch Society/Libertarianism with their politics based on bullshit history?
It is amazing how often I am right, only to be criticized by the media. Illegal immigration, take the oil, build the wall, Muslims, NATO!— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) 24 March 2016
Illegal immigration? He thinks he can find and deport millions of Mexicans.
Take the oil? Well, we all know what that means: WAR!!
Build the wall? He thinks it is feasible to (a) build a wall all along the US-Mexico border, and (b) force Mexico to pay for it!
Muslims? I assume he means stop all Muslim immigration and visits to the USA because he thinks they are all potential terrorists. Hmm. Most if not all Islamic terror in the USA has been run by the FBI, and the big one, 9/11, was a massive inside job.
NATO? I assume he means take the USA out of NATO because he thinks the USA pays too much. He should look again at the finances.
So no. Trump is not right about everything.
In fact, is he right about anything?
1. he was implicated in a treasonous plot against The United States involving Aaron Burr when Burr stayed at Jackson's plantation;
2. Jackson was a slaveholder, at times a brutal one and would have his runaway slaves beaten upon their return, and at one time owned 300 slaves, which made him one of the largest and most powerful slaveholders in Tennessee;
3. Jackson believed in slavery so much that he organised a raid on Negro Fort, which was on Spanish territory, in order to reclaim and return runaway slaves who had found sanctuary there, Jackson offering to pay $50 for each returned runaway slave. But during the raid a stray cannonball hit the fort's arsenal and killed 300 fugitives and Seminoles.
4. Jackson's display of heroism at the Battle of New Orleans was used by the British to build him up for President;
5. Upon being elected as POTUS, Jackson began to dismantle The Second Bank of the United States, which was doing very well in building America into a threat against the British (which is why the British used Jackson to destroy BUS2).
6. Jackson began the process of forcibly removing several native American tribes from their ancestral lands in states like Georgia that would soon secede and form the disgusting Confederacy. These tribes were called 'The Five Civilised Tribes' because the white European settlers believed that these tribes had become civilised to some degree by adopting some of the European ways of life. One of these tribes were the Cherokee, who had earlier saved Jackson's life. Jackson told the Cherokee that the USA would forever be their friend. But Jackson soon stabbed the Cherokee in the back by forcibly removing them, an act that killed thousands of them. The slaveholders and planters showed their appreciation to Jackson by giving him 100% of the vote in the 1832 election, because they would soon be able to build yet more plantations to be worked by slaves on the former ancestral lands of those native Americans. Thus Jackson is the Godfather of the Confederacy;
7. far from being anti-banker, it was Jackson who gave the Rothschilds their big break when he appointed them as agents for the US in Europe.
Any political party that pushes the John Birch Society/Libertarian myth of Andrew Jackson that Libertarianism does must be bogus.
And why would the ultra-rich Koch brothers fund Libertarianism?
But it is not just this, there is also a very strong whiff of Neo-Confederacy.
Jones has stated live on air that his ancestors were colonels and generals in the Confederate Army. Who they are he will not say. But he allows Neo-Confederate guests on his show to spew their Neo-Confederate lies about the Confederacy, and publishes works by Libertarians such as Thomas DiLorenzo which claim that the Confederacy did not secede over slavery but over a tariff, when every single ordinance of secession states that the primary reason for their secession was to protect the institution of slavery. Jones comes from Texas. Because he will not state who his Confederate ancestors were we do not know which state they came from, but in my opinion the Texas ordinance of secession is one of the most disgusting examples of white supremacy that has ever been written.
But in addition to this Neo-Confederacy, Jones has also stated live on air (but not on his show) that his family is riddled with CIA!
So there is this lethal concoction of Confedearacy and CIA in Jones' family.
So on to Donald Trump.
Trump is a liar. I showed this yesterday in LYIN' DON'S GREATEST LIES, in which I revealed four of his lies. They are not little fibs. They are whoppers!
Trump's father Fred was a racist. Fred was arrested at a brawl between the KKK and the police, and he was prosecuted for racial discrmination by favouring renting to white people.
Jones at first proclaimed that Donald Trump was 'a ringer', citing the friendship between the Clintons and Trump, and donations from Trump to the Clintons. But over a period of a few months late last year Jones began to give Trump the benefit of the doubt, and eventually had Trump on his show as a guest. During that interview Jones and Trump stated that they would be talking to each other a lot between then and the election. Three months after that appearance on Alex Jones' show, Donald Trump appeared at AIPAC 2016 having stated numerous times that he would be neutral in the Israel-Palestine conflict in order to broker a deal. Trump has stated that he cannot be bought, not even by the Jews. So Trump did not need to suck Zionist cock at AIPAC 2016. BUT HE DID!! In a sickening display of Zionism, Trump basically put the US military at Israel's disposal in order to help Israel get whatever it wants. Trump also blamed Iran for all the trouble and violence and war in the Middle East. He even sympathised with Saudi Arabia!
The three things that I see as positive about Donald Trump are:
1. he thinks that NATO is a drain on American finances and could possibly withdraw from NATO because of this;
2. he wants tariffs to promote America-based production as opposed to importing cheap foreign goods;
3. he would renegotiate trade deals such as TPP.
Regarding finance of NATO, the Pentagon gets over a half a trillion dollars a year. So how much does NATO get from that? Less than 0.1%. So not exactly a drain on finances. If Donald Trump sees that true figure he may well change his mind on thinking that NATO membership is not worthwhile.
Regarding tariffs, Donald Trump has shipped jobs abroad and taken advantage of cheap labour overseas, principally Mexico and Bangladesh. Would Trump benefit financially from imposing tariffs to bring his jobs back to America? Why did he ship them abroad in the first place? There is a strong whiff of hypocrisy about all this.
So what is left is the single issue of trade deals. To vote for a man on a single issue requires that that man is 100% trustworthy and would deliver on any promise he made. I personally could not trust Trump after his speech at AIPAC 2016.
So, this is 'the resistance'.
Bullshit history. Neo-Confederacy. CIA. Rampant Zionism. Lies.
What could possibly go wrong?
Should we blame ALL Muslims?
Or a particular network within NATO intelligence?
Funnily enough that was the most frequently visited blog all yesterday.
Compare those questions with the posts of PJW.
Thursday, March 24, 2016
But The ZioChump has been lyin' too.
Here are some of Lyin' Don's greatest lies:
1. He claims he was opposed to the war on Iraq in 2003. The truth is that when the war started he supported it, but shortly after it began he began to express concern for the way the war was being run, but not the war itself (see Donald Trump and the Iraq War).
2. He claims that he was opposed to the war on Libya in 2011. The truth is that he called for war on Libya to take out Gaddafi on humantitarian grounds (see Trump Says Removing Qaddafi Was Mistake, But Pushed For Libya Intervention In 2011). NB The Chump has not called for a similar war on Israel, even though the evidence against his best buddy Netanyahu is crystal clear. This links to lie #3.
3. He claims he will be neutral in the Israel-Palestinian conflict. The truth is that at AIPAC 2016 he came down firmly on the side of Israel, and threatened the Palestinians with force if they did not submit to Israel. He also blamed Iran for everything and threatened them with force too, and he also sympathised with Saudi Arabia (see Republican Presidential Candidate Donald Trump Remarks).
4. He claims that he built his business from scratch. The truth is that he inherited at least $40 million, but possibly as much as $200 million from his father (see Exposing How Donald Trump Really Made His Fortune: Inheritance from Dad and the Government's Protection Mostly Did the Trick). He has also stated that he was 'given' Manhattan by his father, and multiple sources also state that his father greased a few wheels in New York so that The Chump could build his business 'from scratch'.
These are not little lies. They are epic. They show that The Chump is fucking clueless on foreign policy. This is very dangerous.
Or a particular network within NATO intelligence?
The Belgian security services, as well as other Western intelligence agencies, had advance and precise intelligence warnings regarding the terrorist attacks in Belgium on Tuesday, Haaretz has learned.
The security services knew, with a high degree of certainty, that attacks were planned in the very near future for the airport and, apparently, for the subway as well.
Despite the advance warning, the intelligence and security preparedness in Brussels, where most of the European Union agencies are located, was limited in its scope and insufficient for the severity and immediacy of the alert.
[source : EXCLUSIVE: Belgian Intelligence Had Precise Warning That Airport Targeted for Bombing, Haaretz, http://www.haaretz.com/world-news/1.710572, 23rd March 2016]
Wednesday, March 23, 2016
Before the interview Knight thought that Trump could be believed and that AIPAC would reject Trump.
But after Trump spoke at AIPAC, Trump was adored by AIPAC, and Trump had revealed himself to be a total fraud, intially proclaiming that he would be 'neutral' but then in an astonishing display of Zionism proclaiming that he would strengthen the already strong US military and then use it to back Israel in whatever Israel wanted!!
Now that is betrayal.
Much more than the Bolton Monarchy betrayed me.
Betrayal. To proclaim 'neutrality' but then come down so decisively on the side of not just Israel but also Saudi Arabia?!
But we must understand : this is Erdogan speaking.
Turkey detained one of the Brussels suicide bombers, Ibrahim el-Bakraoui, in June 2015 on charges of being a foreign fighter.
El-Bakraoui was later extradited to Belgium where he was cleared of the charges after they couldn’t find sufficient evidence. Turkish Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan said Belgium ignored Turkey’s “warning that this person is a foreign fighter.” (Explained In Two Minutes: The Insane Rise Of ISIS)
“One of the attackers in Brussels is an individual we detained in Gaziantep in June 2015 and deported,” Erdogan said Wednesday, according to Reuters. “We reported the deportation to the Belgian Embassy in Ankara on July 14, 2015, but he was later set free.”
So can a bunch of ragtag Jihadis organise this, like is alleged that the Mafia could change the route for JFK on 22/11/1963?
Or is there a network of intelligence agents responsible?
And yes, that is the same Saudi Arabia who The Chump believes is the innocent in The Middle East.
This is the scary bit: The Chump really is a ZioChump.
But what of Bernie Sanders?
Sanders did not speak at AIPAC, he decided to campaign instead.
But on Monday he gave a speech about Israel...and it is much more considered and profound than The Chump's.
Here are some excerpts that indicate that Sanders, despite being Jewish, is much more neutral on Israel than the lyin' Chump claimed to be (before he betrayed himself at AIPAC):
I am here to tell the American people that, if elected president, I will work tirelessly to advance the cause of peace as a partner and as a friend to Israel.
But to be successful, we have also got to be a friend not only to Israel, but to the Palestinian people, where in Gaza unemployment today is 44 percent and we have there a poverty rate which is almost as high.
So when we talk about Israel and Palestinian areas, it is important to understand that today there is a whole lot of suffering among Palestinians and that cannot be ignored. You can’t have good policy that results in peace if you ignore one side.
...Peace will require that organizations like Hamas and Hezbollah renounce their efforts to undermine the security of Israel. It will require the entire world to recognize Israel.
Peace has to mean security for every Israeli from violence and terrorism.
But peace also means security for every Palestinian. It means achieving self-determination, civil rights, and economic well-being for the Palestinian people.
Peace will mean ending what amounts to the occupation of Palestinian territory, establishing mutually agreed upon borders, and pulling back settlements in the West Bank, just as Israel did in Gaza – once considered an unthinkable move on Israel’s part.
...It is absurd for elements within the Netanyahu government to suggest that building more settlements in the West Bank is the appropriate response to the most recent violence. It is also not acceptable that the Netanyahu government decided to withhold hundreds of millions of Shekels in tax revenue from the Palestinians, which it is supposed to collect on their behalf.
...Peace will also mean ending the economic blockade of Gaza. And it will mean a sustainable and equitable distribution of precious water resources so that Israel and Palestine can both thrive as neighbors.
Right now, Israel controls 80 percent of the water reserves in the West Bank. Inadequate water supply has contributed to the degradation and desertification of Palestinian land. A lasting peace will have to recognize Palestinians are entitled to control their own lives and there is nothing human life needs more than water.
...We recently saw a dramatic example of just how important this concept is. In 2014, the decades-old conflict escalated once more as Israel launched a major military campaign against Hamas in the Gaza Strip. The Israeli offensive came after weeks of indiscriminate rocket fire into its territory and the kidnapping of Israeli citizens.
Of course, I strongly object to Hamas’ long held position that Israel does not have the right to exist – that is unacceptable. Of course, I strongly condemn indiscriminate rocket fire by Hamas into Israeli territory, and Hamas’ use of civilian neighborhoods to launch those attacks. I condemn the fact that Hamas diverted funds and materials for much-needed construction projects designed to improve the quality of life of the Palestinian people, and instead used those funds to construct a network of tunnels for military purposes.
However, let me also be very clear: I – along with many supporters of Israel – spoke out strongly against the Israeli counter attacks that killed nearly 1,500 civilians and wounded thousands more. I condemned the bombing of hospitals, schools and refugee camps.
...Today, Gaza is still largely in ruins. The international community must come together to help Gaza recover. That doesn’t mean rebuilding factories that produce bombs and missiles – but it does mean rebuilding schools, homes and
hospitals that are vital to the future of the Palestinian people.
These are difficult subjects. They are hard to talk about both for many Americans and for Israelis. I recognize that, but it is clear to me that the path toward peace will require tapping into our shared humanity to make hard but just decisions.
[source : Sanders Outlines Middle East Policy, Bernie Sanders, https://berniesanders.com/sanders-outlines-middle-east-policy/, 21st March 2016]
In those 1500 civilians that Israel killed were 520 children.
520 dead children.
Thanks to Netanyahu, who The Chump claims is "a great guy"!!
I wonder how many standing ovations Bernie would have got had he delivered this speech at AIPAC?
I'll give you a clue: it begins with z.
The Chump basically put the US military at Israel's disposal against Iran and the Palestinians, no questions asked.
Bernie wants Israel to stop the illegal blockade and give some dignity back to the Palestinians.
Who do you think Israel will support?
He really and sincerely is a Zionist.
He joked that he doesn't need their money because he has got so much of it already and cannotg be bought.
Yet he went to AIPAC and sucked their cocks!
This is scary.
Be afraid. Be very afraid.
The suspected suicide bombers in the Brussels terror attack yesterday have been named as Khalid and Ibrahim el-Bakraoui.
And guess what?
THEY WERE SUSPECTS IN THE PARIS ATTACK!!
First we had Operation Gladio.
Now it is Operation Jihadio.
The Belgian state broadcaster RTBF is reporting that two of the suspected terrorist suicide-bombers at Brussels airport were Khalid and Ibrahim el-Bakraoui.
The Belgian el-Bakraoui brothers were well-known to the police as longstanding criminals in the Belgian capital and more recently it emerged they had clear links to November’s Paris attacks.
This connection to the Paris attacks and to recent police raids in Brussels, in which some suspects escaped from police, is a very significant development. If the Brussels bombers prove to be part of the same cell as the Paris attackers, this will raise serious questions about potential police and intelligence failings.
Brussels attacks: suicide bombers 'named as el-Bakraoui brothers' – live updates https://t.co/G4tM7qiQ15— The Guardian (@guardian) 23 March 2016
Before The Chump was to speak at AIPAC two days ago, Infowhores reported that The Chump was to meet with the GOP leadership.
Then on Monday The Chump sucked Zionist cock with the most obscene display of Zionism, basically taking sides with Israel and Saudi Arabia, who are the real instigators of the wars and terrorism in North Africa and the Middle East since 9/11, and who were both created and now controlled by the British. The Chump also stated that as POTUS he would place the mighty US military at the disposal of Israel, and would resurrect the persecution of Iran.
So I thought, hmm, what have Infowhores said about this obscene speech by The Chump at AIPAC? After all, they seem to hang and report on his every word.
So I visited Infowhores website, enter a search term, waiting to find out what Infowhores said about The Chump's obsene display of Zionism at AIPAC, only to be told:
Please disable ad blocking services to see your results.
NO! I am not disabling my ad blocker.
A search on several search engines suggests that Infowhores have not, repeat NOT, reported on The Chump's obscene display of Zionism at AIPAC.
Now why would that be?
They'll report on a woman punching a horse, but not on The Chump's obscene display of Zionism at AIPAC.
Why is that?
As with Alex Jones' ancestors being riddled Confederate Generals and Colonels.
And his current family being riddled with CIA.
Silence (unless you disable your ad blocker).
Tuesday, March 22, 2016
He supported the war on Libya in 2011.
He now pretends that he didn't support those wars.
But at the time they kicked off, he did.
Yes, he may have criticised the wars after they started and ended.
But when both wars started, The Chump supported both of those wars.
Last night he basically sucked Zionist cock at AIPAC.
He verbally attacked Iran, accusing Iran of being behind everything in the Middle East.
He has said that he thinks the US military is weak (even though it has bases all over the world and the US spends more on its military than the rest of the world combined (or near enough)).
But last night he essentially pledged to make Israel great again.
By empowering the already mighty US military further, and then placing it at the disposal of Israel!!
No wonder he received so many rapturous standing ovations at AIPAC!!
But we know from Seymour Hersh's The Redirection that the Jihadis now running amok in The Middle East were unleashed by the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia, and they were to be unleashed onto Syria, Iran and Lebanon.
But who did The Chump blame for these Jihadis at AIPAC last night?
And we also know Islamic State was proposed by the US DIA report in 2012.
The Chump, in support for the war on Libya 2011, stated that the USA should go into Libya and take the oil.
The Chump, in support for the war on Iraq in 2003, stated that the USA should have taken out Saddam the first time (in 1991).
And now he states that Iran is the problem, when it is actually the British-controlled Israel and Saudi Arabia instigating all the violence in the Middle East and North Africa.
This is how Donald Trump and Islamic State are married...and it is a marriage made in hell.
Shake your head in total disbelief.
And then ask: WTF are he and Alex Jones discussing?
1. Manchester City FC are in full meltdown;
2. ditto the T4 Tories;
3. and The Chump finally revealed that he is a fraud by basically sucking Zionist cock at AIPAC last night.
But today NATO spoiled my week and allowed a few terrorist attacks in Brussels.
A few decades ago NATO ran Operation Gladio, a series of terrorist attacks by extreme right wing paramilitaries but blamed by NATO intelligence and law enforcement on Communists, in order to drag Europe to the right of the political spectrum.
Today NATO is running Operation Jihadio.
Think about it.
Brussels is the home NATO.
The Jihadi capital of Europe, Molenbeek, is just 4 miles from NATO HQ.
Yet somehow, even though they had been under surveillance since 2012, a Jihadi terror cell based in Molenbeek was able to kill 130 people in Paris (an attack that provided the perfect casus belli for France and the UK to bomb Syria).
And now, despite Brussels being on high alert, the airport and tube station were blown up!
Monday, March 21, 2016
The Chump just sucked Zionist cock at AIPAC.
He blames Iran for everything!!
At one point he says that Iran is a problem in Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Yemen and Saudi Arabia.
And he threatens force against Iran!!
And this comes after he claimed that the US military was weak and that he would hugely increase its power!!
And just watch AIPAC give him so many standing ovations after he made them all cum with his Zionist-cock-sucking Zionism!!
Does The Chump mention A Clean Break?
Does The Chump mention the plan revealed to General Wesley Clark?
Does The Chump mention The Redirection as reported by Seymour Hersh?
Does The Chump mention Israel's nukes?
Does he mention the Zionist PNAC being behind 9/11?
Does he mention Netanyahu's infanticide in 2014 in which 520 children were blown to bits in Gaza by Israeli 'precision' bombing?
There is absolutely no fucking way that The Chump is anti-NWO.
NO FUCKING WAY!!!
The Chump, and implicitly Alex Jones, is a fucking fraud!!
Take for instance The Chump's statement at about 14:20 about a knife wielding Palestinian. But does The Chump mention Netanyahu's infanticide in 2014, in which 520 children in Gaza were blown to smithereens?
But all this makes me ask the question again: what the fuck is Alex Jones telling The Chump?!
What are they discussing?
After watching this horrific betrayal at AIPAC, The Chump must be stopped.
He will be very, very, very dangerous as a President of The United States of America. He believes the US military is weak and will massively increase its power. But then, as implied in this speech, he will use that empowered US military to attack Israel's enemies!!
But isn't this just PNAC with a silly wig?!
And what a provocative statement that he would move "the US Embassy to the eternal capital of the Jewish people, Jerusalem".
The Chump basically said that if he was President he would back Israel in anything that it wanted (after drastically increasing its already powerful military).
This is why Sheldon Adelson is supporting The ZioChump, and why The ZioChump told Adelson (and everyone else) that nobody is more pro-Israel than The ZioChump.
How the fuck can Infowhores support The ZioChump any more?
But this would also explain why PJW appears on Zionist media so much.
But in a way I am glad that The Chump has finally, finally revealed his fake 'neutrality' on Israel: it is fake.
Just like he supported the war on Iraq in 2003, months before it kicked off, but now claims he opposed it.
Just like he supported the war on Libya in 2011, months before it kicked off, but now claims he opposed it.
What else is he faking? His anti-NWO-ness?
Anyone who is anti-NWO does NOT suck Zionist cock like The Chump did tonight!!!!
DUMP THE CHUMP!!
DUMP THE CHUMP!!
DUMP THE CHUMP!!
DUMP THE CHUMP!!
DUMP THE CHUMP!!
DUMP THE CHUMP!!
DUMP THE CHUMP!!
It's easy peasy lemon squeezy!
TAX THE CITY OF LONDON!!!!
They caused the financial chaos.
They can pay for it.
Instead he sent a junior member of the Treasury today to The House of Commons.
George Osborne is in full retreat after the Government promised no further welfare cuts and his shambolic Budget continued to unravel only five days after he delivered it.
The embattled Chancellor came in for further criticism as he declined to attend an emergency Commons statement on his “disappearing Budget”, leaving the Treasury Minister David Gauke to face the music. But Mr Osborne will be in the spotlight when he winds up a four-day Budget debate on 22 March.
'Missing' George Osborne on the retreat as Budget evaporates https://t.co/xK5onB4hrd— The Independent (@Independent) 21 March 2016
But at least Oik will appear tomorrow.
Unlike The Bolton Monarchy and Confederate General Alex Jones...
But just to show just how 'compassionate' The Conservative Party is, Pigeon Murderer Cameron actually praised Inane Duncan Smith!
Inane Duncan Smith.
The vile creature behind Workfare and The Bedroom Tax.
That is the compassionate Conservative Party for you!
“America can’t ever be neutral when it comes to Israel’s security and survival,” she said to repeated cheers and applause. “Some things aren’t negotiable and anyone who doesn’t understand that has no business in being our president.”
At least with The Chump it sounds like there may be an attempt to negotiate a deal. It's just that, when he comes out with statements like nobody is more pro-Israel than The Chump, I'm not sure just how 'neutral' The Chump would actually be...
Yesterday The ZioChump restated this to George Stephanopoulos on ABC This Week.
STEPHANOPOULOS: Well, that sounds -- it sounds like you're not backing down on that at all.
Tomorrow, a big speech -- you have a big speech tomorrow, speaking to the American-Israel Public Affairs Committee.
In that speech, will you stand by your pledge to be neutral between Israel and Palestine so you can broker a peace deal?
TRUMP: Well, you're going to hear what I'm going to say at the speech and I'll save it for that. There is nobody more pro-Israel than I am. But you'll hear what I say at the speech and we'll see what happens.
STEPHANOPOULOS: What kind of a deal would be in Israel's interests?
TRUMP: I think making a deal would be in Israel's interests. I'll tell you what, I don't know one Jewish person that doesn't want to have a deal, a good deal, a proper deal, but a really good deal. But I would say it's probably one of the toughest deals -- me being a dealmaker, it's probably one of the toughest deals in the world to make, because there's just so many -- there's just so many decades of hatred between the two sides. It's probably one of the toughest deals to make, if you're a person that prides yourself on being able to get people together.
STEPHANOPOULOS: So what does a good deal look like, though?
TRUMP: But I think it's something...
STEPHANOPOULOS: Will -- will...
TRUMP: -- I -- I think it's something...
STEPHANOPOULOS: -- Israel have to give up some land?
TRUMP: -- that we should try very hard to get. And I don't know any Jewish people that don't want to make it. They'd all love to see a deal made. Now, they want to have a good deal, not an Obama-type deal. They want to have a good deal made.
STEPHANOPOULOS: Define a good deal.
TRUMP: Well, I'll define that tomorrow, because I'll be defining it tomorrow. I'm not going to define it now. I'm not going to define it tomorrow.
But we would like to see, and everybody would like to see a real deal be made, not a deal that's going to be broken, a real deal being made, something that can be lasting.
And I -- if I win, I'm going to be giving that a very good shot.
STEPHANOPOULOS: Mr. Trump, thanks for joining us this morning.
Thank you very much.
[source : 'This Week' Transcript: Donald Trump, Reince Priebus, Denis McDonough, and Sen. Mitch McConnell, ABC, http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/week-transcript-donald-trump-reince-priebus-denis-mcdonough/story?id=37775643, 20th March 2016]
So how can you be 'neutral' but at the same time claim to be the most pro-Israel person on Planet Earth?
But also, how can you claim to be anti-NWO for a long time, yet:
1. adore the instigator of infanticide Benjamin Netanyahu;
2. claim to be the most pro-Israel person on God's green earth;
3. support wars in Iraq and Libya?
Sunday, March 20, 2016
So to make this absolutely crystal clear, I shall now use R instead of r when I ask that question again, so that you all know I am referring to Ayn Rand's Cult of Selfish and not, you know,... :
So why has the ungrateful Randy Bolton Monarchy not deleted those reports?
Let me rephrase that:
So why has the ungrateful Randy Bolton Monarchy not even thanked me for those reports?
Can you see where I am going with this?
There has been absolutely no contact whatsoever. Is this to be used as some form of denial of receipt? For if they acknowledge receipt through a simple and humane "thanks", such a thanks would betray the origin of any knowledge they have which they intend to use for their own private gain?
May I remind you: I tried several times over several months to provoke some kind of interest in current affairs in one of them, but all I sensed was no interest in history and current affairs but great interest in the really, really, really good stuff, and then finally ostracism.
What bunch of ungrateful, ignorant, arrogant fuckers wouldn't even thank someone for sending them those reports, despite that treatment, and despite me having spent approaching £ 1000 on books and several thousand hours reading, risking life and livelihood for the children of the very same ungrateful Randy Bolton Monarchy, me having decided against having children (for now) due to my particular experience as a child?
The only conclusion I can come to is that the ungrateful Randy Bolton Monarchy are using those reports for their own selfish gain.
I suspect that she thought she had been sent those reports by accident, she having previously ostracised me, so she kept quiet, hoping that that was the case.
I think it was a massive surprise when I asked her for her help in January 2014 (which was not offered). I asked for her help because:
1. I honestly thought she could;
2. but also that she was supposed to.
I think that she and her family have been using what I sent (in great faith and trust expecting that they would want to help me) and hope to use it for their own selfish gain.
So I'll ask the ungrateful Randy Bolton Monarchy one more time, politely:
dear ungrateful Randy Bolton Monarchy, please delete those reports.
I'll let you all know the response, if any.
But he married into the Montefiore banking family who were (and still are?) very close to THE Rothschild banking family, the founders of Israel.
In The Independent today, Cockburn tells yet another half-truth: that some Western politicians should be blamed for the rise of Islamic State.
A strange aspect of these conflicts is that Western leaders have never had to pay any political price for their role in initiating them or pursuing policies that effectively stoke the violence. Isis is a growing power in Libya, something that would not have happened had David Cameron and Nicolas Sarkozy not helped destroy the Libyan state by overthrowing Gaddafi in 2011. Al-Qaeda is expanding in Yemen, where Western leaders have given a free pass to Saudi Arabia to launch a bombing campaign that has wrecked the country.
[source : How politicians duck the blame for terrorism, The Independent, http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/politics/how-politicians-duck-the-blame-for-terrorism-a6942016.html, 19th March 2016]
In this Cockburn is correct. But Cameron and Sarkozy are just middlemen at most, if that.
And as usual, Cockburn protects Israel.
As reported by Seymour Hersh in March 2007 in The Redirection, the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia agreed that the latter would unleash the worst international cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria, Lebanon and Iran. I believe that this decision was taken because the original plan A had failed, in which, as revealed to General Wesley Clark shortly after 9/11, the USA would execute war and regime change in seven countries in five years: Iraq, Iran, Lebanon, Syria, Sudan, Libya and Somalia.
However, the Jihadis were first unleashed onto Libya, and they were actually al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb. These cutthroat Jihadis were given cover as 'freedom fighters' under the US State Dept-engineered Arab Spring.
After killinig Gaddafi these Jihadis and their weapons looted from Libya's arsenal were smuggled into Syria.
Cockburn covers up Israel's role in all this, specifically that it was the Zionist Project for a New American Century which laid the political foundations for the wars through their documents and their close links to the authors of A Clean Break, and the very powerful positions they held on 9/11.
The Christian Crusades were ultra-violent, including mass rape of Muslim women on all but one crusade.
The major religions are just as bad as each other: violence; rape; kiddie-fiddling.
Someone analysed the Bible and Quran to see which is more violent https://t.co/xmyQ9mQC3n— The Independent (@Independent) 20 March 2016
Saturday, March 19, 2016
How do we know that that desire to protect slavery that drove his ancestors to become Generals in The Confederate Army is not now present in his blood via some kind of Confederate gene?
To become a General in The Confederate Army meant that you really believed in that war. And, as all ordinances of secession clearly state that the Confederate states seceded to protect the institution of slavery, we can assume that Jones' ancestors believed in slavery. And it is that kind of sentiment that is passed down from Confederate generation to Confederate generation.
Did Jones' ancestors own slaves?
Or were they involved in the slave trade in some way?
I have a book entitled The Slave Trade by Hugh Thomas, in which Thomas states that Texas was crucial to the slave trade. Texas was originally part of Mexico, which banned slavery in 1829. But Texans broke from Mexico to form their own republic so that they could legalise slavery in Texas!
This explains why the Texas ordinance of secession is one of the most disgusting examples of white supremacy.
This neo-Confederacy (or is it just laziness) of Jones, who allows his guests to spew all sorts of pro-Confederate bullshit, has got me very, very concerned.
And there is some kind of symmetry in the following: that Jones, whose ancestors were colonels and generals in the Confederate Army, is pushing Donald Trump, who has appointed as his foreign policy and national security advisor a man whose full name is Jefferson Beauregard Sessions, who is named after Jefferson Davis, The President of The Confederate States of America, and Confederate General Beauregard, who fired the first shot on Fort Sumter which really kicked off the US Civil War.
So, is there a Confederate gene?
Oiksterity is not working.
And now his T4-esque policies of transferring crucial payments for the disabled to bribe the middle class (possibly into voting against a Brexit) has led to the equally disastrous buffoon Inane Duncan Smith to resign (who resigned over Europe not the T4 policies).
I agree with Jez: Oik must go now.
For the good of the country, Oik must go, and go now.
Osborne has failed the British people. He should follow the honourable course taken by Iain Duncan Smith and resign pic.twitter.com/5DeJA4jzIz— Jeremy Corbyn MP (@jeremycorbyn) 18 March 2016
So what, I hear you ask.
Well, first, and a clue, Sessions' family come from Alabama, a member of the Confederacy.
But it gets much worse.
Sessions' full name is Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III.
And yes, he is named after Jefferson Davis, the President of The Confederate States of America, and General Pierre Gustave Toutant-Beauregard, who fired the first shot in the US Civil War when he attacked Fort Sumter.
You literally could not make this stuff up!!
And just to ease your mind: Sessions, like The Chump, supported war on Iraq in 2003, and is friendly towards Israel.
1. The Bolton Monarchy and their associates destroy those reports;
2. The Bolton Monarchy give me a recipe for one of their lethal, addictive potions;
3. David Icke to offer to refund all my donations;
4. Alex Jones to reveal the intimate relationship between his family and the disgusting Confederacy.
Two more things are:
5. the USA to release their imagery/radar data of the alleged BUK missile that brought down MH17;
6. Louis van Gaal to realise that his career at Man Utd is fcukt.
Apparently The Chump is anti-New World Order, and has been for a long time.
Yet The Chump supported the war on Iraq in 2003!
The Chump now claims that he didn't at the time. But he did actually support that war. In an interview during the first week of the war he criticised the running of the war but not the actual war itself. It was not until 2004 that he opposed the war. But he now pretends that he opposed the war when it began. In other words he is lying.
And he also supported the war on Libya in 2011, but as with the war on Iraq he now claims that he was against it.
The Chump is on record stating his love for the instigator of infanticide in 2014, Benjamin Netanyahu, saying that mass child-murderer Netanyahu is "a great guy", and telling Sheldon Adelson that nobody loves Israel more than The Chump.
So is this why The Chump is speaking at AIPAC next week?
And is this why Sheldon Adelson is backing The Chump?
While Sheldon Adelson has yet to endorse a candidate for president, and refused to let reporters peek at his ballot at last month’s caucus in Nevada, it’s starting to look like the conservative rebellion against Donald Trump will not be bankrolled by the casino operator and Republican donor known for his far-right views.
Three times this week, the front page of the Israeli tabloid Adelson set up to support Benjamin Netanyahu’s Likud party, Israel Hayom (Israel Today), has featured fawning coverage of Trump. The newspaper is widely seen in Israel as a megaphone for Adelson’s own views.
[source : Sheldon Adelson’s Israeli Newspaper Has a Crush on Donald Trump, The Intercept, https://theintercept.com/2016/03/18/sheldon-adelsons-israeli-tabloid-crush-donald-trump/, 18th March 2016]
If The Chump slags Israel off next week at AIPAC and gets booted out then I'll trust him.
But The Chump has stated that he believes that Iran is the trouble-maker in the Middle East, when it is actually Israel and Saudi Arabia starting all the wars and assisting all the international cutthroat Jihadis rampaging through Syria. But The Chump has stated that he would support Saudi Arabia, and that he loves Israel and Netanyahu. Yet it is Israel and Saudi Arabia who did 9/11 and then used 9/11 to kick off the series of wars that have occured since then in North Africa and the Middle East!
The Chump needs to expose Israel and Saudi Arabia.
Do not trust The Chump.
Not just yet.
BTW selfish Ayn Rand supported Israel. If there is one country who can be described as selfish it is Israel, driviing nearly a million Palestinians into the two largest refugee camps in the world, Gaza and West Bank, and then brutally occupying those camps.
The Confederate States of America were racist dickheads. They, outnumbered at least 4 to 1 and with very little industrial economy, seceded from the Union in order to protect slavery. They say so in all their documents written at the time. But now Neo-Confederacy is trying to say that it was all about tariffs instead (even though tariffs are barely mentioned in documents and statements at the time).
Alex Jones is the self-proclaimed leader of 'the resistance'. How that came to be is a mystery. Or perhaps not when we look at his family: he has stated live on air that during the US Civil War his family were generals and colonels in the Confederate Army, which was fighting to protect slavery; and he has also stated live on air that half his family are CIA.
Unless he is making it all up...
As leader of 'the resistance' we should expect him and his team of Infowhores to have accurate history, otherwise they are coming to the wrong conclusions and suggesting the wrong solutions based on inaccurate historical analyses.
So is it any wonder that their inaccurate analysis of President Andrew Jackson, the Godfather of The Confederacy, has led them into supporting the Neo-Confederate/Libertarian/John Birch Society/Ayn Rand Cult of Selfish zone of politics?
For example, The Libertarian Party/John Birch Society push a rose-tinted view of Andrew Jackson in which Jackson slew the bankers. Yet it was slaveholder Jackson who began the drive to force the native Americans from their ancestral lands in soon to be Confederate states, even though it was recognised that those native Americans had become 'civilised'. This led to the slaveholders in those soon to be Confederate states buying up the former ancestral lands and building plantations worked by slaves. Those slaveholders then seceded in 1861 to form the Confederate States of America in order to protect slavery. And Alex Jones' ancestors joined The Confederate Army and reached the ranks of Colonel and General in their quest to defend slavery. And the selfish Ayn Rand supported this forced removal, even though it was recognised that those native Americans had become 'civilised' and over 4000 of them died during their forced removal!
The Confederate States of America were a Confederacy of racist dickhead dunces, and Alex Jones is descended from them and pushing one political solution based on inaccurate history.
Thursday, March 17, 2016
It is me who has not got it through my thick skull yet that what is mine is yours and what's yours remains yours.
But I'm tryin'. God knows I'm really tryin'.
And both Hillary Clinton and The Chump will be speakers.
So what is AIPAC?
The AIPAC Policy Conference is the largest gathering of America's pro-Israel community. Through demonstrations of groundbreaking Israeli innovations, keynote speeches by American and Israeli leaders, inspiring moments on stage, and intimate educational sessions, Policy Conference delegates experience the full scale of pro-Israel activism in three powerful days.
The conference culminates with the opportunity for delegates to lobby their members of Congress in support of legislation that enhances the relationship between the United States and Israel.
Who Attends the Conference?
More than 15,000 pro-Israel Americans
More than two-thirds of Congress
More than 3,600 students from more than 630 campuses
283 Student Government Presidents from all 50 states
More than 275 synagogue delegations
AIPAC members from across the country
It's Been Said...
"The AIPAC Policy Conference...is the Jewish equivalent to the Oscars or the Grammys—the big, buzzy annual event everyone talks about before it happens and gossips about afterward."
- Tablet Magazine, Stephanie Butnick
"What impressed me was the AIPAC-ers' earnestness, intensity and warmth."
- The Daily Beast, Gil Troy
"Bipartisanship is a perennial priority for AIPAC, and its policy conference regularly draws the attendance of supportive lawmakers from both major American parties."
- The Huffington Post, Joshua Hersh
[source : What Is Policy Conference?, AIPAC, http://www.policyconference.org/article/AboutPC.asp
So both anticipated nominees are going to suck up to Israel?
Hillary: Voted for the Iraq war which killed 1 million mostly Muslims.— Paul Joseph Watson (@PrisonPlanet) 17 March 2016
Trump: Opposed the Iraq war from the start.
= TRUMP HATES MUSLIMS.
But there's a teeny weeny problem: THE CHUMP SUPPORTED THE WAR!!
For further details see my blog on this at DONALD CHUMP SUPPORTED WAR ON IRAQ IN 2003.
The timeline is this:
1. The Chump supported the war on Iraq as it began;
2. but within a week began to question how the war was being prosecuted, but did not oppose the war, only the way it was being run;
3. in 2004 he stated that he opposed the war;
4. in 2015 he began to suggest that he had opposed the war from the start (when as you can see he actually supported it, even as it was being run poorly).
How can anyone take crucial benefits from the seriously disabled to bribe the middle class with a tax cut?
No wonder The Oik is a Bilderberger.
His Bilderberg Oiksterity has not worked.
He must go and go now.
Wednesday, March 16, 2016
I DO NOT THINK THE BOLTON MONARCHY, RANDY OR OTHERWISE, HAVE IT GOT IT THROUGH THEIR THICK SELFISH SKULLS
But what I have got in return is betrayal.
I want every single copy destroyed by them. They know what the info is. Now they can go find it themselves, like I did over 20 or so years, spending possibly £ 1000 on books, but definitely hours of early mornings or late nights when I should have been preparing something else, e.g. teaching.
The ungrateful, randy (or otherwise) Bolton Monarchy should delete those reports I sent for one pair of eyes only and in great faith and trust,
That trust has been let down and betrayed.
So to avoid all further friction the one obvious thing that the ungrateful, randy (or otherwise) Bolton Monarchy can do is to destroy all , repeat all, copies of the reoprts.
They, the ungrateful, randy (or otherwise) Bolton Monarchy, cannot be trusted.
And by randy I really do mean their devotion to Ayn Rand's Cult of Selfish.
I don't suppose you've, you know, done the honourable thing, made my day, and deleted those reports?
If not then please send me a recipe for one of your lethal, addictive potions, give it a week and then ask for it back. I would then return it and not keep a copy in any format.
Tuesday, March 15, 2016
Who were they?
The Five Civilised Tribes were called that because invading hordes of white Europeans considered the tribes had some degree of civilisation after adopting some of the practices of the invading hordes of white Europeans. But that was obviously not enough for the invading hordes of white Europeans, who wanted their ancestral lands so that the invading hordes of white Europeans could build plantations to be worked by African slaves.
You will note that the Five Civilised Tribes lived in what would soon to be treasonous Confederate states, like Georgia and Mississippi.
The planters and slaveholders loved Jackson so much for this that in the 1832 election they all voted for Jackson, i.e. Jackson got 100% of the vote.
Ayn Rand supported this removal, calling the native Americans "savages", even though the removal led to the deaths of 4000 native Americans.
And yes, that is the same Ayn Rand so adored by PJW.
That event was 9/11.
14 years later that devastating World War 3 has still not occured.
And now Russia is leaving Syria.
I once believed that 9/11 was supposed to kick off the third of three world wars allegedly planned by Albert Pike.
The fact that:
1. no hard evidence exists to prove that the letter he wrote to Giuseppe Mazzini actually existed;
2. after 14 years WW3 has still not occured.
implies that Pike's three world war plan is bogus.
The song is called The Snake. It was written by Oscar Brown and has been covered by several artists. Here is Al Wilson's version which is apparently very popular on the Northern Soul circuit.
Brown was inspired to write the song from Aesop's fables.
The Chump was inpsired to use it to label all Muslims as backstabbing snakes.
What does that tell ya'?
Monday, March 14, 2016
The rich are getting ridiculoulsy richer.
1% have received 25%!?!?
I wonder what share Conefederate Alex Jones received from all that dodgy info dressed up as 'the troof'...
In advance of Wednesday’s Budget, analysis by Oxfam reveals that the richest 1 per cent of Britons, a group solely comprising millionaires, have received more than a quarter of the £4trn increase in national wealth since 2000.
The richest 1% of Britons are getting richer https://t.co/nrkTzNccf8— The Independent (@Independent) 14 March 2016
Sunday, March 13, 2016
Of course they fucking are!
They flog their addictive potions, but then when given a much more accurate version of the truth...
Which is a likkul bit curious, because I thought they believed in their own brand of Commumism: that what's yours is theirs but what's theirs remains theirs.
And I would still love to know what names I was called behind my back.
Epic display of authoritarianism through statements that even peaceful protestors against him should be locked up.
Epic rant in favour of torture.
Epic warmongering statement that he'll destroy Islamic State (but what if Syria and Iraq don't want The Chump bombing their nations, only to stop the flow of arms and fighters through NATO member Turkey?)
Epic unnecessary criticism of Iran, suggesting that Iran is the beneficiary of all the warmongering in the Middle East, which indicates a very poor analysis (is this due to his previous statements of allegiance to Israel and Saudi Arabia who are the true instigators of the wars in the Middle East?).
Epic false statement that the US military is weak and needs to be beefed up much more(?!)
Epic and creepy poem which compares all Muslims to snakes.
Good criticism of TPP.
But then epic hypocrisy over Mexico, citing several companies moving to Mexico for cheap labour but conveniently forgetting that his Signature clothing products are made in Mexico. And then, FFS, that fucking wall, and yes, Mexico is going to pay for it. But a good statement on trade deals and tariffs to bring jobs back to, or at least keep them in, America.
I can see how the Establishment is scared of The Chump.
But he terrifies me in a lot of ways, namely:
1. inaccurate analysis of foreign affairs;
2. racism towards Muslims and Mexico;
3. authoritarianism where to even protest peacefully against The Chump will land you in jail, and as he was proud to say, a fucked up, jobless life.
And just to confirm: The Chump ends with the statement that America is going to take, take, take.
Be afraid. Be very afraid.
Saturday, March 12, 2016
Friday, March 11, 2016
A hate preacher once known as the Tottenham Ayatollah helped recruit jihadist fighters for Islamic State from the UK, according the huge leak of data about the terror group.
Omar Bakri Mohammed, who radicalised Fusilier Lee Rigby’s killers despite being deported from Britain to Lebanon in 2005, was named as a sponsor by British jihadists trying to be inducted into IS.
Four fighters from Cardiff, including Reyaad Khan, 21, who was killed in Raqqa last year by a UK drone, named Bakri as their ‘referee’, according to the leaked papers.
[source : Exiled 'Tottenham Ayatollah' helped recruit jihadist fighters for Islamic State from the UK, ISIS HR files leak reveals, Daily Mail, http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3487016/Exiled-Tottenham-Ayatollah-helped-recruit-jihadist-fighters-Islamic-State-UK-ISIS-HR-files-leak-reveals.html, 11th March 2016]
But Omar Bakri Mohammed is also a British Intelligence agent!!
Dr Hanif, whose doctoral thesis was about the group, points out that Husain’s tenure inside HT by his own account occurred “under the leadership of Omar Bakri Mohammed,” the controversial cleric who left the group in 1996 to found al-Muhajiroun, a militant network which to this day has been linked to every major terrorist plot in Britain.
Bakri’s leadership of HT, said Dr Hanif, formed “the most conceptually deviant period of HT’s existence in the UK, diverting quite sharply away from its core ideas,” due to Bakri’s advocacy of violence and his focus on establishing an Islamic state in the UK, goals contrary to HT doctrines.
When Bakri left HT and set-up al-Muhajiroun in 1996, according to John Loftus, a former US Army intelligence officer and Justice Department prosecutor, Bakri was immediately recruited by MI6 to facilitate Islamist activities in the Balkans. And not just Bakri, but also Abu Hamza al-Masri, who was recently convicted in the US on terrorism charges.
...At least some HT [Hizb ut-Tahrir] members appear to have been aware of Bakri’s intelligence connections, including, it seems, Ed Husain himself. In one passage in The Islamist (p. 116), Husain recounts: “We were also concerned about Omar’s application for political asylum… I raised this with Bernie [another HT member] too. ‘Oh no’, he said, ‘On the contrary. The British are like snakes; they manoeuvre carefully. They need Omar in Britain. More likely, Omar will be the ambassador for the khilafah here or leave to reside in the Islamic state. The kuffar know that - allowing Omar to stay in Britain will give them a good start, a diplomatic advantage, when they have to deal with the Islamic state. Having Omar serves them well for the future. MI5 knows exactly what we’re doing, what we’re about, and yet they have in effect, given us the green light to operate in Britain.”
[source : The circus: How British intelligence primed both sides of the ‘terror war’, Middle East Eye, http://www.middleeasteye.net/columns/circus-how-british-intelligence-primed-both-sides-terror-war-55293733, 27th Februarry 2015]
So MI5 allowed Michael Adebalajo to preach Jihad against President Bashar al-Assad of Syria.
And now one of their own is named as a sponsor of and referee for recruits of Islamic State.
So why would MI5 do this?
1. Shortly after 9/11 Syria was named to General Wesley Clark as one of 7 nations destined for war and regime change in five years. But by 2007 this plan was moribund. So in 2007 the USA, ISrael and Saudi Arabia agreed that the latter would unleash the worst international cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria, Lebanon and Iran. This was revealed by Seymour Hersh in The Redirection. These jihadis were unleashed onto Syria in 2011. But by 2014 Assad had not been removed. In 2012 the US DIA proposed a plan to allow a Salafist entity to grow in Syria which could be used by the NATO/Zionist/Gulf States attacking Syria as a means to isolate Assad. This US DIA plan has been implemented, that Salafist entity we know as Islamic State. But such an entity requires willing recruits, so the British, in their infinte wisdom, have been ecnouraging and allowing potential recruits to go to Syria to join Islamc State via their fellow NATO member Turkey. The UK is now openly bombing Syria, something that the UK was not able to do in 2011.;
2. Jihadis of Islamic State returning to the UK are being cited by the heads of MI5, MI6 and GCHQ as the reason that the spies should be given more intrusive surveillance powers.