I'd say that at half-time Greece is losing but can come back from 3 -1 down.
Saturday, February 21, 2015
THIS IS HOW ISLAMIC STATE WILL BE USED TO PROVOKE WAR ON SYRIA
With all the media frenzy focusing on who killed Lucy Beale in Eastenders, it was quietly reported this week that selected Syrian rebels will be given radios to contact the USA military and call in air strikes on targets that the rebels think should be bombed. The alleged belief is that the moderate rebels, if they exist, will only call in air strikes on Islamic State positions.
But do you really think that will happen?
Do moderate rebels actually exist?
And if so then to whom are they loyal?
Tony Cartalucci has identified how Islamic State will be used to provoke a war on Syria: there are no moderate rebels; so whoever gets the radios will call in air strikes on Syrian military positions; and when that happens how will the Syrian military respond? And how will the USA respond to that response?
I was suggesting in summer last year that Islamic State were created in order to be used to get at Assad in whatever way would work, and that American bombers would soon be bombing Syrian military accidentally on purpose to provoke retaliation from the Syrian military, but I never once believed that the rebels would actually be given radios to call in those air strikes to provide some (im)plausible deniability!!
But Tony has nailed it: this will probably provoke war on Syria...as the warmongers have been wanting since at least 1991 when Paul Wolfowitz told General Wesley Clark that the USA had 5 to 10 years to take out those old Soviet client regimes: Iraq, Iran and Syria. These 3 nations with Hezbollah were then named in A Clean Break in 1996, then also in Rebuilding America's Defenses in 2000, then 9/11 was engineered to provide the casus belli, then the plan for war on seven nations in five years was revealed to Clark was implemented: Iraq, Iran, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Sudan and Somalia. But by 2007 this Plan A was moribund so Plan B was agreed between the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia that the latter would unleash cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria, Lebanon and Iran. But that has not worked because after 4 years Assad is still in power.
So we now have this Plan C.3 in which Islamic State's allies will be given radios to call in air strikes.
But air strikes on whom?
Islamic State or Assad?
It will obviously be on Assad.
But who will give a fuck when Fifty Shades of Grey will be out on DVD when all this is happening.
But do you really think that will happen?
Do moderate rebels actually exist?
And if so then to whom are they loyal?
Tony Cartalucci has identified how Islamic State will be used to provoke a war on Syria: there are no moderate rebels; so whoever gets the radios will call in air strikes on Syrian military positions; and when that happens how will the Syrian military respond? And how will the USA respond to that response?
I was suggesting in summer last year that Islamic State were created in order to be used to get at Assad in whatever way would work, and that American bombers would soon be bombing Syrian military accidentally on purpose to provoke retaliation from the Syrian military, but I never once believed that the rebels would actually be given radios to call in those air strikes to provide some (im)plausible deniability!!
But Tony has nailed it: this will probably provoke war on Syria...as the warmongers have been wanting since at least 1991 when Paul Wolfowitz told General Wesley Clark that the USA had 5 to 10 years to take out those old Soviet client regimes: Iraq, Iran and Syria. These 3 nations with Hezbollah were then named in A Clean Break in 1996, then also in Rebuilding America's Defenses in 2000, then 9/11 was engineered to provide the casus belli, then the plan for war on seven nations in five years was revealed to Clark was implemented: Iraq, Iran, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Sudan and Somalia. But by 2007 this Plan A was moribund so Plan B was agreed between the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia that the latter would unleash cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria, Lebanon and Iran. But that has not worked because after 4 years Assad is still in power.
So we now have this Plan C.3 in which Islamic State's allies will be given radios to call in air strikes.
But air strikes on whom?
Islamic State or Assad?
It will obviously be on Assad.
But who will give a fuck when Fifty Shades of Grey will be out on DVD when all this is happening.
...Clearly then, if all the “moderate rebels” the US claims are in Syria have in fact long-ago pledged allegiance to Al Qaeda, then US airstrikes called in by these militants will essentially be airstrikes called in by Al Qaeda against the only legitimate forces in the region actually fighting terrorism.
The creation of ISIS, just like during the US occupation of Iraq where Al Qaeda created the “Islamic State of Iraq” to maintain plausible deniability, is simply an attempt to build distance between the Al Qaeda terrorists the US is directly arming and will soon be providing air cover for, and the overt atrocities being carried out by these very same terrorists.
While ISIS is currently being touted by the US as the pretext upon which this recent move is predicated, the reality is instead that America and its allies are simply “easing into” a direct military confrontation with the Syrian Arab Army.
As US airstrikes begin hitting Syrian positions, it is likely that eventually Syria or its allies will retaliate and provoke a wider and more direct campaign against Damascus itself. Should Syria and its allies resist striking back, the US is likely to manufacture a provocation anyway.
Barring Syria and its allies’ ability to provide sufficient deterrence against the beginning of this latest, most dangerous, and most desperate yet leg of America’s war on Syria, and should Syrian defenses be incapable of staving off a Libyan-style NATO operation that has left that nation entirely in the hands of ISIS, expect to see yet another nation handed directly over to extremists – intentionally – for the sole purpose of continuing this proxy crusade next into Lebanon and Iran, then into southern Russia and western China.
[source : Tony Cartalucci, US “Easing Into” War with Syria Using ISIS Boogeyman, http://journal-neo.org/2015/02/21/us-easing-into-war-with-syria-using-isis-boogeyman/, 21st February 2015]
Friday, February 20, 2015
WHAT DOES BRITISH MILITARY INTELLIGENCE ACTUALLY DO?
Besides run paedos and cover up their abuses, and murder mothers of future Kings of England, what does British Military Intelligence actually do?
I ask this because it has apparently been left to a former bank clerk from Leicester, who taught himself weapons, to prove using the internet that Russia attacked Ukraine from Russian soil. And he actually wrote an article in The Guardian praising his own report!!
You would expect that British Military Intelligence would be:
a) observing the Russia-Ukraine border very, very closely at this particular time in history;
b) analysing all possible intelligence, human, satellites, phone calls, social media etc.
c) causing international scenes, such as Adlai Stevenson did at the UN SC when he presented evidence of Soviet missiles in Cuba, that "wait until hell freezes over" speech, if Russia had attacked Ukraine.
After all, it is their job, to protect the Kingdom. Or has this extremely important job now been delegated to a former bank clerk from Leicester?
However, I do not recall seeing or hearing of such a Stevenson moment at the UN or even press conference regarding Russia actually attacking Ukraine.
All I see is an author of a report claiming Russia attacked Ukraine praising his own report in The Guardian.
Of course, I'll change my mind if someone like British Military Intelligence or their allies provides evidence...
Here is Stevenson preparing to wait until hell freezes over and presenting the evidence:
If you have the evidence from professionals using super duper rinky dinky technology then why not do this instead of relying on a bunch of amateurs who use the internet?
Incompetence?
Embarrassment?
Or it never happened?
I ask this because it has apparently been left to a former bank clerk from Leicester, who taught himself weapons, to prove using the internet that Russia attacked Ukraine from Russian soil. And he actually wrote an article in The Guardian praising his own report!!
You would expect that British Military Intelligence would be:
a) observing the Russia-Ukraine border very, very closely at this particular time in history;
b) analysing all possible intelligence, human, satellites, phone calls, social media etc.
c) causing international scenes, such as Adlai Stevenson did at the UN SC when he presented evidence of Soviet missiles in Cuba, that "wait until hell freezes over" speech, if Russia had attacked Ukraine.
After all, it is their job, to protect the Kingdom. Or has this extremely important job now been delegated to a former bank clerk from Leicester?
However, I do not recall seeing or hearing of such a Stevenson moment at the UN or even press conference regarding Russia actually attacking Ukraine.
All I see is an author of a report claiming Russia attacked Ukraine praising his own report in The Guardian.
Of course, I'll change my mind if someone like British Military Intelligence or their allies provides evidence...
Here is Stevenson preparing to wait until hell freezes over and presenting the evidence:
If you have the evidence from professionals using super duper rinky dinky technology then why not do this instead of relying on a bunch of amateurs who use the internet?
Incompetence?
Embarrassment?
Or it never happened?
DO YOU WANT TO KNOW WHY THE ANGLO-AMERICAN ESTABLISHMENT ARE SHITTING THEIR PANTS?
Vladimir Putin has somehow become the figurehead of this apparently anti-Anglo-American Establishment movement called BRICS. As a consequence Putin is the target of outrageous propaganda and provocations, and I would also suggest assassination attempts, the most famous perhaps being 17th July 2014.
For those who do not quite understand why BRICS and their new international development bank is such a threat to the Anglo-American Establishment: shame on you!
Too busy reading Fifty Shades of Grey and similar stuff?
Basically The Federal Reserve of The United States was established by an Anglophile cabal in the United States, has been creating money out of nothing for over a century to finance tyrants and world wars, and is the dominant force in the IMF and World Bank apparatus that has controlled international finance for decades.
So how has this apparatus done so far?
Well, just look around you: shite!!! Poverty for most and an incredibly astronomically wealthy 0.00001%.
I hope that BRICS have formed as a scheme to help a significant percentage of the human race rather than just be an alternative.
Readers should note that last quoted sentence.
This bank was agreed a few days before 17th July 2014.
Putin was on his way back to Russia from making that agreement when a rumour began to circulate that he was to land in Rostov.
The paths of MH17 and Putin crossed over Poland.
Putin's official plane would look very similar to MH17 to a Ukrainian pilot of a SU25 from the 299 Squadron who supported the Kiev Nazis...
And if I am wrong then perhaps the Ukraine Air Force can tell us what they were all doing on 17th July 2014...
For those who do not quite understand why BRICS and their new international development bank is such a threat to the Anglo-American Establishment: shame on you!
Too busy reading Fifty Shades of Grey and similar stuff?
Basically The Federal Reserve of The United States was established by an Anglophile cabal in the United States, has been creating money out of nothing for over a century to finance tyrants and world wars, and is the dominant force in the IMF and World Bank apparatus that has controlled international finance for decades.
So how has this apparatus done so far?
Well, just look around you: shite!!! Poverty for most and an incredibly astronomically wealthy 0.00001%.
I hope that BRICS have formed as a scheme to help a significant percentage of the human race rather than just be an alternative.
The Russian State Duma has ratified the $100 billion BRICS bank that’ll serve as a pool of money for infrastructure projects in Russia, Brazil, India, China and South Africa, and challenge the dominance of the Western-led World Bank and the IMF.
...The decision to establish the BRICS bank, along with a $100 billion reserve currency pool, was made in July 2014.
[source : Russia ratifies $100bn BRICS New Development Bank, RT, http://rt.com/business/234027-russia-ratifies-brics-bank/, 20th February 2015]
Readers should note that last quoted sentence.
This bank was agreed a few days before 17th July 2014.
Putin was on his way back to Russia from making that agreement when a rumour began to circulate that he was to land in Rostov.
The paths of MH17 and Putin crossed over Poland.
Putin's official plane would look very similar to MH17 to a Ukrainian pilot of a SU25 from the 299 Squadron who supported the Kiev Nazis...
And if I am wrong then perhaps the Ukraine Air Force can tell us what they were all doing on 17th July 2014...
FIGHT!
Remember in junior school when a few kids began to fight and someone would shout, "Fight!"?
Well, it's kicking off over at Elliot Higgins' twitter!!
Sputnik ran a report on an article in The Guardian which looked at Higgins' latest report issued through Belling Cat which Belling Cat says proves that Russia fired from Russian territory into Ukraine.
The Sputnik report asks this perfectly valid question:
Hmm. Yes, it is very curious that NATO would withhold such evidence...if they had it!!
And the same argument and question applies to MH17. In the case of MH17 NATO, i.e. USA, says it has the data to prove that separatists shot down MH17 from Shnizhne but has curiously kept that data secret and instead released a very childish image of an arc and straight line intercepting over Donetsk which they say is based on that data. I mocked that image yesterday as devastatingly persuasive. And it must be remembered that that image contradicts the initial claims of the Ukraine Security Service, who say MH17 was shot down by Cossacks from Chernukino, and that regarding Shnizhne as the launch site, Belling Cat believe that a field 5 Km south of Shnizhne was the launch site while Der Spiegel and Correctiv (in collaboration with Belling Cat!!) produced flashy reports suggesting that based on eyewitnesses a field 3 Km north of Shnizhne was in fact the launch site.
It is all such a farce and would be comical if 298 people had not been killed.
But do Belling Cat not find it the least bit curious that NATO, repeat NATO, i.e. the USA, UK, Germany, Canada etc., with all their spying and analysis power cannot do what Belling Cat do based purely on social media, which is produce anti-Russia 'information'? NATO has satellites with cameras that from space can take photographs of a parasite on an ant, spies on everything we do. Yet based on a photo of a crater, which can be accessed by NATO intelligence (assuming NATO has access to the internet), only Belling Cat can state that it was caused by Russia. Not one military intelligence unit in the NATO sphere can say this. Only Belling Cat can. And this claim is then repeated by politicians and the NATO media.
NATO, and in particular British Military Intelligence, must be so incompetent and/or so embarrassed!!
I also find it curious that Belling Cat spend so much time tracing the alleged movements of Russian military personnel and hardware in Ukraine when for 4 years Syria has been invaded by international cutthroat cannibal Jihadis who have now morphed into Islamic State and been financed by Saudi Arabia and Qatar, armed and trained by the USA, supported by the UK and France and Turkey (where Higgins' wife comes from), trained in Jordan, and medically and militarily assisted by Israel, and Belling Cat have not produced one report, not even a tiny one, against this illegal invasion and use of a bloodthirsty proxy force as per a plan that was implemented after 9/11 (as revealed by General Wesley Clark) and amended in 2007 (as revealed by Seymour Hersh). That illegal invasion/war has led to an estimated over 200,000 deaths and millions of refugees. But what does Higgins focus on? The use of barrel bombs in Aleppo, i.e. one tiny part of a global war, and Ghouta, which I sort of predicted and blamed on Prince Bandar of Saudi Arabia.
And regarding Ukraine:
1. NATO destabilised Ukraine after Yanukovich decided to sign a huge deal with Russia instead of with the IMF;
2. NATO ran the Nazis who ousted Yanukovich in a violent coup, and those Nazis burned many alive in Odessa;
3. NATO wants Ukraine as a member and vice versa with the current junta;
4. NATO wants first strike missiles in Ukraine aimed at Moscow;
5. NATO is not happy with Putin for foiling their plans to bomb the shit out of Syria after Bandar's false flag at Ghouta failed to provoke the demand for war it was supposed and assumed would do.
A week or two ago Higgins was embroiled in a twitter argument with the holder of the twitter account Non_Disclosure regarding funding. Higgins was dodging the question by replying that Non_Disclosure should suggest a source of finance and Higgins would confirm or deny if he or Belling Cat had received finance from that source.
It would be useful for Higgins and the whole Belling Cat team to be open and transparent about their finances instead of trying to hide them and mock questions about them. I was open and transparent last week when I declared that in the last 16 years all my finances have only come from teaching and researching mathematics, and before that from warehouse work.
Open and transparent, like the investigation in to MH17 should be by looking into activities of Ukraine's air force and BUKs on 17th July 2014.
Well, it's kicking off over at Elliot Higgins' twitter!!
Sputnik ran a report on an article in The Guardian which looked at Higgins' latest report issued through Belling Cat which Belling Cat says proves that Russia fired from Russian territory into Ukraine.
The Sputnik report asks this perfectly valid question:
Asked about the central claims made in the study that his group of unpaid "citizen journalists" had found evidence of direct Russian military attacks on the Ukrainian army when NATO and the Western powers had been unable to produce a single piece of credible evidence to support that, Higgins replied, "Maybe they have, and weren't sharing it, but I couldn't really speak on behalf of the intelligence services in that regard."
[source : Guardian Corrects Anti-Russian Story Based on 'Research' of Own Reporter, Sputnik, http://sputniknews.com/military/20150219/1018504330.html, 19th February 2015]
Hmm. Yes, it is very curious that NATO would withhold such evidence...if they had it!!
And the same argument and question applies to MH17. In the case of MH17 NATO, i.e. USA, says it has the data to prove that separatists shot down MH17 from Shnizhne but has curiously kept that data secret and instead released a very childish image of an arc and straight line intercepting over Donetsk which they say is based on that data. I mocked that image yesterday as devastatingly persuasive. And it must be remembered that that image contradicts the initial claims of the Ukraine Security Service, who say MH17 was shot down by Cossacks from Chernukino, and that regarding Shnizhne as the launch site, Belling Cat believe that a field 5 Km south of Shnizhne was the launch site while Der Spiegel and Correctiv (in collaboration with Belling Cat!!) produced flashy reports suggesting that based on eyewitnesses a field 3 Km north of Shnizhne was in fact the launch site.
It is all such a farce and would be comical if 298 people had not been killed.
But do Belling Cat not find it the least bit curious that NATO, repeat NATO, i.e. the USA, UK, Germany, Canada etc., with all their spying and analysis power cannot do what Belling Cat do based purely on social media, which is produce anti-Russia 'information'? NATO has satellites with cameras that from space can take photographs of a parasite on an ant, spies on everything we do. Yet based on a photo of a crater, which can be accessed by NATO intelligence (assuming NATO has access to the internet), only Belling Cat can state that it was caused by Russia. Not one military intelligence unit in the NATO sphere can say this. Only Belling Cat can. And this claim is then repeated by politicians and the NATO media.
NATO, and in particular British Military Intelligence, must be so incompetent and/or so embarrassed!!
I also find it curious that Belling Cat spend so much time tracing the alleged movements of Russian military personnel and hardware in Ukraine when for 4 years Syria has been invaded by international cutthroat cannibal Jihadis who have now morphed into Islamic State and been financed by Saudi Arabia and Qatar, armed and trained by the USA, supported by the UK and France and Turkey (where Higgins' wife comes from), trained in Jordan, and medically and militarily assisted by Israel, and Belling Cat have not produced one report, not even a tiny one, against this illegal invasion and use of a bloodthirsty proxy force as per a plan that was implemented after 9/11 (as revealed by General Wesley Clark) and amended in 2007 (as revealed by Seymour Hersh). That illegal invasion/war has led to an estimated over 200,000 deaths and millions of refugees. But what does Higgins focus on? The use of barrel bombs in Aleppo, i.e. one tiny part of a global war, and Ghouta, which I sort of predicted and blamed on Prince Bandar of Saudi Arabia.
And regarding Ukraine:
1. NATO destabilised Ukraine after Yanukovich decided to sign a huge deal with Russia instead of with the IMF;
2. NATO ran the Nazis who ousted Yanukovich in a violent coup, and those Nazis burned many alive in Odessa;
3. NATO wants Ukraine as a member and vice versa with the current junta;
4. NATO wants first strike missiles in Ukraine aimed at Moscow;
5. NATO is not happy with Putin for foiling their plans to bomb the shit out of Syria after Bandar's false flag at Ghouta failed to provoke the demand for war it was supposed and assumed would do.
A week or two ago Higgins was embroiled in a twitter argument with the holder of the twitter account Non_Disclosure regarding funding. Higgins was dodging the question by replying that Non_Disclosure should suggest a source of finance and Higgins would confirm or deny if he or Belling Cat had received finance from that source.
.@EliotHiggins Phew, that was close, at least they didn't find the incriminating pics. pic.twitter.com/J0IwFH90pT
— Veli-Pekka Kivimäki (@vpkivimaki) February 19, 2015It would be useful for Higgins and the whole Belling Cat team to be open and transparent about their finances instead of trying to hide them and mock questions about them. I was open and transparent last week when I declared that in the last 16 years all my finances have only come from teaching and researching mathematics, and before that from warehouse work.
Open and transparent, like the investigation in to MH17 should be by looking into activities of Ukraine's air force and BUKs on 17th July 2014.
Thursday, February 19, 2015
A PATTERN
We bombed Iraq, then gave them Islamic State.
We bombed Libya, then gave them Islamic State too.
We wanted to bomb Syria, but gave them Islamic State instead.
Next?
Lebanon - Islamic State?
Italy?
Switzerland?
Holland?
UK?
The whole world?
Mars?
Uranus? (giggle, giggle)
We bombed Libya, then gave them Islamic State too.
We wanted to bomb Syria, but gave them Islamic State instead.
Next?
Lebanon - Islamic State?
Italy?
Switzerland?
Holland?
UK?
The whole world?
Mars?
Uranus? (giggle, giggle)
RUSSIA TRIES TO BOMB TRURO BUT IS FOILED BY THE RAF
British media are ablaze with a story that the RAF was scrambled to intercept Russian bombers off the coast of Cornwall.
But guess what: the bombers were always in international air space!!!
A similar scare story happened a few weeks ago just as the Litvinenko Inquiry began. The Russian Ambassador to Great Britain was summoned to the FCO to explain himself and Russia's obviously deliberate provocations for war. However, the Russian Ambassador pointed out that the plans for those flights had been filed in full accordance with international regulations so Great Britain had no reason to be concerned, i.e. there was no scare. A similar outcome will occur following this non-event.
But we can fully sympathise with the British government's position that Russia is the aggressor and is seeking war by flying planes in international air space in full accordance with international regulations. I mean, just look how close Russia has placed its country to NATO's bases!!!
And quite soon you might be able to plonk a NATO logo on Ukraine following the violent NATO-sponsored neo-Nazi coup which has led to Ukraine taking one step closer to joining NATO, a recipient of NATO funds becoming Prime Minister, and the new Ukraine finance minister coming straight from the American Embassy in Kiev and signing Ukraine over to the IMF and Monsanto.
No wonder Callous Cameron wants to use armed Police to seal off woods so he can shoot pigeons without being seen. Those pigeons are revealing the plan!!
Innocent harmless pigeon in tree : "Coup! Coup! Coup! Coup!"
Paranoid Callous Cameron: "I'll teach you a lesson for blabbing our plot in Kiev!!" BANG! BANG!
Innocent harmless pigeon in tree is now an ex-innocent harmless pigeon on the ground with its brains blown out.
But guess what: the bombers were always in international air space!!!
A similar scare story happened a few weeks ago just as the Litvinenko Inquiry began. The Russian Ambassador to Great Britain was summoned to the FCO to explain himself and Russia's obviously deliberate provocations for war. However, the Russian Ambassador pointed out that the plans for those flights had been filed in full accordance with international regulations so Great Britain had no reason to be concerned, i.e. there was no scare. A similar outcome will occur following this non-event.
But we can fully sympathise with the British government's position that Russia is the aggressor and is seeking war by flying planes in international air space in full accordance with international regulations. I mean, just look how close Russia has placed its country to NATO's bases!!!
And quite soon you might be able to plonk a NATO logo on Ukraine following the violent NATO-sponsored neo-Nazi coup which has led to Ukraine taking one step closer to joining NATO, a recipient of NATO funds becoming Prime Minister, and the new Ukraine finance minister coming straight from the American Embassy in Kiev and signing Ukraine over to the IMF and Monsanto.
No wonder Callous Cameron wants to use armed Police to seal off woods so he can shoot pigeons without being seen. Those pigeons are revealing the plan!!
Innocent harmless pigeon in tree : "Coup! Coup! Coup! Coup!"
Paranoid Callous Cameron: "I'll teach you a lesson for blabbing our plot in Kiev!!" BANG! BANG!
Innocent harmless pigeon in tree is now an ex-innocent harmless pigeon on the ground with its brains blown out.
LIAR LIAR SETS GAZA ON FIRE
Netanyahu: Once a liar - ALWAYS a liar: http://t.co/9Udk1Mti9f pic.twitter.com/6ThktnmdQ5
— David Icke (@davidicke) February 19, 2015Once a liar always a liar.
But this liar also sets Gaza on fire.
IS THERE ANYTHING RIGHT WITH VLADIMIR PUTIN?
According to NATO, Vladimir Putin is a paedophile, autistic, a tyrant, a wife-beater, a drunken letch and had plastic surgery.
Is there anything right with Vladimir Putin?
Meanwhile, in the real world, there is a real-life Whitehall VIP paedophile and murder scandal cover-up that runs straight through Downing Street and into Buckingham Palace.
Putin is no saint, but with devils behind NATO controlling The White House and Downing Street even Jesus Christ himself would do more than overturn the tables of the moneychangers to save the world from a total catastrophic war.
It is bleedin' obvious that the devils behind NATO destabilised Ukraine through a violent neo-Nazi coup because Yanukovich had decided to sign a huge deal with Russia rather than the EU and IMF. NATO's man Yats rose from being a geeky-looking weakling scared of his own shadow to somehow become the new PM with the full backing of Victoria Kagan-Nuland, so that now Ukraine's finance minister is an American straight form the US Embassy in Kiev, and Ukraine is signing huge deals with the EU and IMF and has taken one step closer to joining NATO.
This probably wouldn't concern Putin if this was happening in Ireland or Mexico but Ukraine has a border with Russia. If Ukraine joins NATO then NATO could plonk first strike missiles in Ukraine aimed at Moscow.
Now imagine that a violent neo-Nazi coup occured in say France and Russia was believed to be behind it after a geeky-looking weakling scared of his own shadow with money from the FSB sponsoring his foundation suddenly became PM. What would we do?
The situation in Ukraine is similar to the Cuban Missile Crisis 1962. In that crisis the USSR was suspected of plonking first strike missiles in Cuba, but this was after the CIA's failed invasion at The Bay of Pigs provoked the USSR into defending their ally Fidel Castro. In the case of Ukraine, Yanukovich decided to ally with Russia so NATO unleashed the Nazis to burn people alive in Odessa (like Islamic State) and then sign with the EU/IMF/NATO.
It's that obvious that NATO is the imperialist that even pigeons dumping on the church roof know what happened: coup! coup! coup!
And all this anti-Putin propaganda is just that: propaganda. Putin is the figurehead of an apparent global resistance to the hegemony of the kiddie-fiddlers in Whitehall and Buckingham Palace due to organisations such as BRICS and their alternative to the IMF.
As reports suggest today, there have been several assassination attempts on Putin but all have failed. Those reports are restating that as a warning to him. This is why Bandar threatened Putin in 2013 that if Putin didn't dump Assad then Bandar would unleash hell in Syria and Lebanon, so Bandar gave us Ghouta. This is why the oil price has been reduced by head-chopping Saudi Arabia. And this is why Theresa May has decided after all these years that there should be an inquiry into the death of MI6 agent Litvinenko but only with establishment QCs like Robin Tam and Ben Emmerson running the farce and lots of evidence involving MI6 either kept secret or heard in secret.
I mean, do you honestly believe that May would appoint an independent QC with a heart of gold to be counsel to an inquiry involving child abuse and murder when that inquiry could bring down the establishment?
Is there anything right with Vladimir Putin?
Meanwhile, in the real world, there is a real-life Whitehall VIP paedophile and murder scandal cover-up that runs straight through Downing Street and into Buckingham Palace.
Putin is no saint, but with devils behind NATO controlling The White House and Downing Street even Jesus Christ himself would do more than overturn the tables of the moneychangers to save the world from a total catastrophic war.
It is bleedin' obvious that the devils behind NATO destabilised Ukraine through a violent neo-Nazi coup because Yanukovich had decided to sign a huge deal with Russia rather than the EU and IMF. NATO's man Yats rose from being a geeky-looking weakling scared of his own shadow to somehow become the new PM with the full backing of Victoria Kagan-Nuland, so that now Ukraine's finance minister is an American straight form the US Embassy in Kiev, and Ukraine is signing huge deals with the EU and IMF and has taken one step closer to joining NATO.
This probably wouldn't concern Putin if this was happening in Ireland or Mexico but Ukraine has a border with Russia. If Ukraine joins NATO then NATO could plonk first strike missiles in Ukraine aimed at Moscow.
Now imagine that a violent neo-Nazi coup occured in say France and Russia was believed to be behind it after a geeky-looking weakling scared of his own shadow with money from the FSB sponsoring his foundation suddenly became PM. What would we do?
The situation in Ukraine is similar to the Cuban Missile Crisis 1962. In that crisis the USSR was suspected of plonking first strike missiles in Cuba, but this was after the CIA's failed invasion at The Bay of Pigs provoked the USSR into defending their ally Fidel Castro. In the case of Ukraine, Yanukovich decided to ally with Russia so NATO unleashed the Nazis to burn people alive in Odessa (like Islamic State) and then sign with the EU/IMF/NATO.
It's that obvious that NATO is the imperialist that even pigeons dumping on the church roof know what happened: coup! coup! coup!
And all this anti-Putin propaganda is just that: propaganda. Putin is the figurehead of an apparent global resistance to the hegemony of the kiddie-fiddlers in Whitehall and Buckingham Palace due to organisations such as BRICS and their alternative to the IMF.
As reports suggest today, there have been several assassination attempts on Putin but all have failed. Those reports are restating that as a warning to him. This is why Bandar threatened Putin in 2013 that if Putin didn't dump Assad then Bandar would unleash hell in Syria and Lebanon, so Bandar gave us Ghouta. This is why the oil price has been reduced by head-chopping Saudi Arabia. And this is why Theresa May has decided after all these years that there should be an inquiry into the death of MI6 agent Litvinenko but only with establishment QCs like Robin Tam and Ben Emmerson running the farce and lots of evidence involving MI6 either kept secret or heard in secret.
I mean, do you honestly believe that May would appoint an independent QC with a heart of gold to be counsel to an inquiry involving child abuse and murder when that inquiry could bring down the establishment?
DEVASTATINGLY PERSUASIVE PROOF THAT THE SEPARATISTS SHOT DOWN MH17
This image was released by the USA shortly after 17th July 2014 and alleges to show the paths of MH17 and a BUK fired from Shnizhne intercepting based on data from 'sensors' belonging to the USA.
IT IS DEVASTATINGLY PERSUASIVE PROOF!!
They won't release this data but instead released this image which they say is based on that data.
Well, I'm convinced. Aren't you?
They said Iraq had WMDs so we went in and killed approaching one million Iraqis to find no WMDs but eventually create Islamic State!!
And if you zoom in you can actually see the missile with small flags of Russia and the Donetsk People's Republic stuck on the front.
But curiously, despite many eyewitnesses stating on camera that they saw Ukrainian fighter jets close to MH17 when it was shot down (a fact overlooked/ignored by NATO and their gimps), those fighter jets are not, repeat not, visible in this image.
Hmm.....
IT IS DEVASTATINGLY PERSUASIVE PROOF!!
They won't release this data but instead released this image which they say is based on that data.
Well, I'm convinced. Aren't you?
They said Iraq had WMDs so we went in and killed approaching one million Iraqis to find no WMDs but eventually create Islamic State!!
And if you zoom in you can actually see the missile with small flags of Russia and the Donetsk People's Republic stuck on the front.
But curiously, despite many eyewitnesses stating on camera that they saw Ukrainian fighter jets close to MH17 when it was shot down (a fact overlooked/ignored by NATO and their gimps), those fighter jets are not, repeat not, visible in this image.
Hmm.....
BREATHTAKING HYPOCRISY FROM THE BRITISH GOVERNMENT
While Cameron says that Russia must stop interfering in Ukraine and Fallon says that Russia could destabilise the Baltic states, the British government has been supporting NATO's Kiev Nazis in a violent coup in Ukraine and since 2009 planning the smuggling of and then supporting international cutthroat cannibal Jihadis in Syria, as well as invading Iraq on lies and supporting AQIM in Libya, and as a result we now have Islamic State sawing the heads off infidels in those states!!
This is breathtaking hypocrisy from the British government.
Sadly this breathtaking hypocrisy would manifest whoever was in Number 10: Labour, Conervative or Liberal Democrat.
Because the real power does not reside there and Number 10 is just a conduit for that power.
However, it could be different if the Greens or Respect were elected.
This is breathtaking hypocrisy from the British government.
Sadly this breathtaking hypocrisy would manifest whoever was in Number 10: Labour, Conervative or Liberal Democrat.
Because the real power does not reside there and Number 10 is just a conduit for that power.
However, it could be different if the Greens or Respect were elected.
Wednesday, February 18, 2015
POWERFUL DOCUMENTARY ON MH17 SUPPORTS THE "GET PUTIN" THESIS
I think there is something to this documentary and its thesis cannot dismissed.
Basically the documentary:
1. claims that 4 Ukraine military SU25s were in the air from 1pm local time on 17th July, with numbers 06, 07, 08 and 38, and that German intelligence knows this;
2. these planes were flown by pilots from the elite 299 Squadron under orders/sponsorship from Kiev oligarch Kolomoisky with the aim of killing President Putin whose official plane was reported to be in the area and its way to Rostov and had a livery very similar to that of MH17;
3. the pilot who shot down MH17 is named along with the dispatcher, who was an overt supporter of the Kiev Nazis;
4. Kolomoisky is connected through Nevzlin to Khordokovsky [TTS : and through Khordokovsky to Lord Jacob Rothschild];
5. shows yet more eyewitnesses shown on camera stating without question that fighter jets were close to MH17 when it all happened;
6. the Ukraine military is being very coy about its flights on 17th July;
7. Ukraine air defences were also in the area of Donetsk on 17th July and the activity of their radar stations was surprisingly at maximum on 17th July [TTS : which is strange when you recall that the 'rebels' had no fighter jets] but then quickly reduced;
8. Putin is a target to the global elite because he is the figurehead of a global resistance to their hegemonyg, e.g. BRICS (as I have been suggesting);
9. asks why the corpses of the pilots have not been released, and why the official investigation into MH17 is taking over a year to publish its report.
And apparently Poroshenko knows all this!!
So what was said in Minsk last week?
Is this why Poroshenko abandoned Debaltsevo?
Is this why Merkel wanted to sort it all out?
Now, I find it curious that it is alleged that German intelligence knows that 4 SU25s were in the air on 17th July, yet it is Der Spiegel who claimed that MH17 was shot down by rebels but with a BUK from the Ukraine military, and then later with Correctiv publishes a flashy report citing eyewitnesses who say that the rebels shot down MH17 from a field 3 Km north of Shnizhne, but this second report was compiled with Belling Cat who just a few weeks ago firmly backed the thesis that MH17 was shot down from a field 5 Km south of Shnizhne!! And to add to this farce, the Ukraine Security Service released tapes which they said proved 100% beyond doubt that MH17 was shot down by Cossacks from Chernukino, a claim later contradicted by the USA who released a devastatingly persuasive image of an arc originating from Shnizhne intercepting a straight line representing MH17!!
WHAT
A
FUCKING
FARCE!!!!!
We do have to ask what the Ukraine military, and specifically the 299 Squadron, was doing on 17th July 2014 and why they are so coy in telling the world what they were doing on 17th July 2014?
'How MH17 was shot down in Ukraine - Film by Andrey Karaulov (Eng subs)
Basically the documentary:
1. claims that 4 Ukraine military SU25s were in the air from 1pm local time on 17th July, with numbers 06, 07, 08 and 38, and that German intelligence knows this;
2. these planes were flown by pilots from the elite 299 Squadron under orders/sponsorship from Kiev oligarch Kolomoisky with the aim of killing President Putin whose official plane was reported to be in the area and its way to Rostov and had a livery very similar to that of MH17;
3. the pilot who shot down MH17 is named along with the dispatcher, who was an overt supporter of the Kiev Nazis;
4. Kolomoisky is connected through Nevzlin to Khordokovsky [TTS : and through Khordokovsky to Lord Jacob Rothschild];
5. shows yet more eyewitnesses shown on camera stating without question that fighter jets were close to MH17 when it all happened;
6. the Ukraine military is being very coy about its flights on 17th July;
7. Ukraine air defences were also in the area of Donetsk on 17th July and the activity of their radar stations was surprisingly at maximum on 17th July [TTS : which is strange when you recall that the 'rebels' had no fighter jets] but then quickly reduced;
8. Putin is a target to the global elite because he is the figurehead of a global resistance to their hegemonyg, e.g. BRICS (as I have been suggesting);
9. asks why the corpses of the pilots have not been released, and why the official investigation into MH17 is taking over a year to publish its report.
And apparently Poroshenko knows all this!!
So what was said in Minsk last week?
Is this why Poroshenko abandoned Debaltsevo?
Is this why Merkel wanted to sort it all out?
Now, I find it curious that it is alleged that German intelligence knows that 4 SU25s were in the air on 17th July, yet it is Der Spiegel who claimed that MH17 was shot down by rebels but with a BUK from the Ukraine military, and then later with Correctiv publishes a flashy report citing eyewitnesses who say that the rebels shot down MH17 from a field 3 Km north of Shnizhne, but this second report was compiled with Belling Cat who just a few weeks ago firmly backed the thesis that MH17 was shot down from a field 5 Km south of Shnizhne!! And to add to this farce, the Ukraine Security Service released tapes which they said proved 100% beyond doubt that MH17 was shot down by Cossacks from Chernukino, a claim later contradicted by the USA who released a devastatingly persuasive image of an arc originating from Shnizhne intercepting a straight line representing MH17!!
WHAT
A
FUCKING
FARCE!!!!!
We do have to ask what the Ukraine military, and specifically the 299 Squadron, was doing on 17th July 2014 and why they are so coy in telling the world what they were doing on 17th July 2014?
'How MH17 was shot down in Ukraine - Film by Andrey Karaulov (Eng subs)
Tuesday, February 17, 2015
MY FAITH IN THE HUMAN RACE HAS BEEN RESTORED
Flicking through TV channels last night I came across Geordie Shore.
My faith in the human race has now been fully restored, and I now once again truly believe that what I am doing is worth it if it means we can have more TV like, and more celebrities such as those who appear in, Geordie Shore.
My faith in the human race has now been fully restored, and I now once again truly believe that what I am doing is worth it if it means we can have more TV like, and more celebrities such as those who appear in, Geordie Shore.
Monday, February 16, 2015
IT'S A FUNNY OLD WORLD : TAM QC WAS COUNSEL FOR MI6 AND FCO IN DIANA INQUEST
MI5 are accused of covering up the sickening activities at Kincora Children's home.
MI5 employed Robin Tam QC against one of the finest journalists in the world, Tony Gosling.
Robin Tam QC was counsel for the FCO and MI6 in the inquest into the death of Diana.
Robin Tam QC is Counsel to the Litvinenko Inquiry.
The other counsel to that Inquiry is Ben Emmerson QC.
Ben Emmerson QC is also counsel to the Historic Child Abuse Inquiry and is not exactly shining in that role, with his behaviour being questioned by abuse survivors after Theresa May decided to scrap the whole inquiry (except Emmerson) and start again, appointing a New Zealand judge of questionable repute, at the request of Emmerson, to head that inquiry.
Sleep tight.
MI5 employed Robin Tam QC against one of the finest journalists in the world, Tony Gosling.
Robin Tam QC was counsel for the FCO and MI6 in the inquest into the death of Diana.
Robin Tam QC is Counsel to the Litvinenko Inquiry.
The other counsel to that Inquiry is Ben Emmerson QC.
Ben Emmerson QC is also counsel to the Historic Child Abuse Inquiry and is not exactly shining in that role, with his behaviour being questioned by abuse survivors after Theresa May decided to scrap the whole inquiry (except Emmerson) and start again, appointing a New Zealand judge of questionable repute, at the request of Emmerson, to head that inquiry.
Sleep tight.
EVEN PGEONS KNOW THIS IS OCCURING IN UKRAINE
It's so fucking obvious what is happening in Ukraine that even the pigeons dumping on the town hall roof know: Coup! Coup! Coup!
Ukraine Agrees Monsanto Land Grab For $17 Billion IMF Loan (Monsanto and IMF = same network): http://t.co/LV3orpgPiM pic.twitter.com/HKPpKQYUkg
— David Icke (@davidicke) February 15, 2015BACK TO THE FUTURE MEETS GROUNDHOG DAY IN IRAQ
Call me a silly billy, but haven't we been here before?
Poll: Most Americans back ground troops in ISIS fight: http://t.co/5IMsOyVvc3 pic.twitter.com/WDDZ3asitE
— David Icke (@davidicke) February 15, 2015Saturday, February 14, 2015
SURPRISE! PROTESTORS SHOT POLICE AND PROTESTORS IN KIEV
The key moment in the violent coup by NATO-sponsored neo-Nazis in Kiev was the massacre of protestors and police that was blamed on the police.
But guess what!! IT WAS BOLLOCKS.
What happened was in fact a classic NATO Gladio operation akin to that which happened in Venezuela in 2002 in a failed attempted coup to replace Hugo Chavez with a much more Washington-friendly President.
This agrees with the statements of RT reporters, other eyewitnesses, photographs, and international leaders such as Estonia’s foreign minister Urmas Paet who told our very own Catherine Ashton which side had done the shooting.
So next time you see a pigeon, just remember that they know more than you regarding events in Ukraine.
Because there has been a coup.
A violent NATO-sponsored neo-Nazi coup, because Yanukovich had changed his mind and rejected a deal with the EU/IMF in favour of Russia. And Russia had blocked the planned war on Syria after the false flag of Ghouta was supposed to provoke calls for revenge. The result of the coup is that:
1. NATO and Ukraine are about to be betrothed;
2. The IMF is 'loaning' Ukraine tens of billions of dollars and Ukraine is selling its soul to Monsanto (I wonder how much will be spent on weapons from the USA).
It's a text book coup, silly billies!!
And all you are being told to care about is the soft porn in Fifty Shades of Grey.
But guess what!! IT WAS BOLLOCKS.
What happened was in fact a classic NATO Gladio operation akin to that which happened in Venezuela in 2002 in a failed attempted coup to replace Hugo Chavez with a much more Washington-friendly President.
One of the snipers has told the BBC that he and another man were doing the shooting from the Conservatory. He did not identify the man who gave them the guns and ammo, but he is admitting that it was him and this other guy.
"I was shooting downwards at their feet," says a man we will call Sergei, who tells me he took up position in the Kiev Conservatory, a music academy on the south-west corner of the square.
"Of course, I could have hit them in the arm or anywhere. But I didn't shoot to kill."
Sergei says he had been a regular protester on the Maidan for more than a month, and that his shots at police on the square and on the roof of an underground shopping mall, caused them to retreat.
There had been shooting two days earlier, on 18 February. The 19th, a Wednesday, had been quieter, but in the evening, Sergei says, he was put in contact with a man who offered him two guns: one a 12-gauge shotgun, the other a hunting rifle, a Saiga that fired high-velocity rounds.
He chose the latter, he says, and stashed it in the Post Office building, a few yards from the Conservatory. Both buildings were under the control of the protesters.
When the shooting started early on the morning of the 20th, Sergei says, he was escorted to the Conservatory, and spent some 20 minutes before 07:00 firing on police, alongside a second gunman.
[source : The untold story of the Maidan massacre, BBC, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-31359021, 12th February 2015]
This agrees with the statements of RT reporters, other eyewitnesses, photographs, and international leaders such as Estonia’s foreign minister Urmas Paet who told our very own Catherine Ashton which side had done the shooting.
So next time you see a pigeon, just remember that they know more than you regarding events in Ukraine.
Because there has been a coup.
A violent NATO-sponsored neo-Nazi coup, because Yanukovich had changed his mind and rejected a deal with the EU/IMF in favour of Russia. And Russia had blocked the planned war on Syria after the false flag of Ghouta was supposed to provoke calls for revenge. The result of the coup is that:
1. NATO and Ukraine are about to be betrothed;
2. The IMF is 'loaning' Ukraine tens of billions of dollars and Ukraine is selling its soul to Monsanto (I wonder how much will be spent on weapons from the USA).
It's a text book coup, silly billies!!
And all you are being told to care about is the soft porn in Fifty Shades of Grey.
Friday, February 13, 2015
AL QAEDA ASKS ISRAEL FOR A FAVOUR (AGAIN)
This report says it all: al Qaeda in Southern Syria has asked Israel to attack positions held by the Syrian Arab Army and their allies Hezbollah.
If Israel agrees then this wouldn't be the first time. Israel has attacked SAA positions and bases several times, sometimes even coordinated with the rebels.
And it won't be the last.
Because this romantic relationship between Israel and al Qaeda goes all the way back to 9/11. And in 2007 the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia agreed to unleash al Qaeda onto Syria, Lebanon and Iran.
If Israel agrees then this wouldn't be the first time. Israel has attacked SAA positions and bases several times, sometimes even coordinated with the rebels.
And it won't be the last.
Because this romantic relationship between Israel and al Qaeda goes all the way back to 9/11. And in 2007 the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia agreed to unleash al Qaeda onto Syria, Lebanon and Iran.
Israel’s constant attacks on Syrian military targets and Hezbollah forces in southern Syria have killed a number of top anti-ISIS fighters. Now, with Syria and Hezbollah moving against al-Qaeda-held territory in the far south, the rebels are hoping they’ll do it again.
Reports from Israeli Druse leaders who claim they are in close contact with rebels say they’re urging the Israeli military to intervene to “save” the rebel-held territories from the southern offensive.
That territory is almost entirely held by al-Qaeda’s Jabhat al-Nusra, in effect meaning Israel is being asked to save al-Qaeda from the Assad government’s forces.
Israeli officials have insisted in the past they prefer anyone over Assad to be in power in Syria, but this may put that to the test, as al-Qaeda is the anyone in question along the frontier.
It also risks further undercutting the US war in Syria, as even though the Obama Administration won’t coordinate with Assad, they’re openly attacking al-Qaeda targets in the country, and probably won’t look favorably on Israel intervening militarily on al-Qaeda’s behalf.
[source : Southern Syria Rebels Ask Israel to Attack Army, Hezbollah Positions, Anti War, http://news.antiwar.com/2015/02/12/southern-syria-rebels-ask-israel-to-attack-army-hezbollah-positions/, 12th February 2015]
MY MESSAGE TO E T
Can you fix those self-service machines so they don't always tell me, "Unexpected item in baggage area"?
A GREYT DAY FOR THE ANYTHING GOES AGENDA
In 1969 high level Rockefeller employee Dr Richard Day told a private audience the plan for the next few decades. One aspect of the plan was that regarding sex it would be 'anything goes'. Homosexuality would be encouraged and promoted. Abortion would also be encouraged and promoted. This was for several reasons: population control; perversion; one step closer to pure satanism.
It cannot be denied that this part of the agenda has been implemented. Last night on Channel 4 was the latest episode of their new 'flagship' series called Cucumber. Hmm. A gardening programme hosted by Alan Titchmarsh? Don't be such a silly billy! It's about the wildly gay crowd in Manchester! In fact this promotion of homosexuality forms a core component of the war on Russia!!
You can also not have failed to have noticed that today is the general release of Fifty Shades of Grey (hence the title, a play on great). For the last few months we have been bombarded with news about this film as the media and marketing whip us into a vibrating frenzy, quivering with excitement, driving us into an orgasm of demand for furry handcuffs. BBC Radio 5 Live had frequent reports from the London premiere last night.
Now contrast that media coverage with that for the film Selma based on the famous march for civil rights.
Don't tell me that there isn't an agenda to promote anything goes and homosexuality when the World Press Photo of the Year 2014 is of two male homosexuals in Russia while the videos of General Wesley Clark revealing the plan for several wars and regime change after 9/11 remain unseen gathering dust in the vaults.
It cannot be denied that this part of the agenda has been implemented. Last night on Channel 4 was the latest episode of their new 'flagship' series called Cucumber. Hmm. A gardening programme hosted by Alan Titchmarsh? Don't be such a silly billy! It's about the wildly gay crowd in Manchester! In fact this promotion of homosexuality forms a core component of the war on Russia!!
You can also not have failed to have noticed that today is the general release of Fifty Shades of Grey (hence the title, a play on great). For the last few months we have been bombarded with news about this film as the media and marketing whip us into a vibrating frenzy, quivering with excitement, driving us into an orgasm of demand for furry handcuffs. BBC Radio 5 Live had frequent reports from the London premiere last night.
Now contrast that media coverage with that for the film Selma based on the famous march for civil rights.
Don't tell me that there isn't an agenda to promote anything goes and homosexuality when the World Press Photo of the Year 2014 is of two male homosexuals in Russia while the videos of General Wesley Clark revealing the plan for several wars and regime change after 9/11 remain unseen gathering dust in the vaults.
Thursday, February 12, 2015
NORMAL TAXDODGING
Fink says #taxdodging is normal - true for him and his Tory millionaire chums but not for the rest of us! #outoftouch http://t.co/ZuVX3SplER
— Manuel Cortes (@Manuel_TSSA) February 12, 2015These Tory fuckers live on a different planet!!
I have never dodged any tax. NEVER! In fact I've over paid when I've started new jobs.
UNBELIEVABLE!!!
ADDICTED TO WAR
[To the tune of Addicted To Love by Robert Palmer]
You bombed the gooks in Vietnam
A proxy war in Afghanistan
Invade Latin America
death squads to kill Sandanista
You can't sleep, you can't eat
There's no doubt, you're in deep
Your throat is tight, you can't breathe
Another kill is all you need
Ohh oohh
You like to think that you're immune to the stuff...oh yeah
It's closer to the truth to say you always want more
You know you're gonna have to face it
You're addicted to war
You bombed Iraq in '91
Then Bosnia, then Afghanistan
Iraq again, then Libya
You want the same for Syria, but gave them terror
A fake Jihad
Another plan that's gone bad
And then Iran for Israel
to create a Zionist hell
Ohh oohh
You like to think that you're immune to the stuff...oh yeah
It's closer to the truth to say you always want more
You know you're gonna have to face it
You're addicted to war
Might as well face it, you're addicted to war
Might as well face it, you're addicted to war
Might as well face it, you're addicted to war
Might as well face it, you're addicted to war
Might as well face it, you're addicted to war
You bombed the gooks in Vietnam
A proxy war in Afghanistan
Invade Latin America
death squads to kill Sandanista
You can't sleep, you can't eat
There's no doubt, you're in deep
Your throat is tight, you can't breathe
Another kill is all you need
Ohh oohh
You like to think that you're immune to the stuff...oh yeah
It's closer to the truth to say you always want more
You know you're gonna have to face it
You're addicted to war
You bombed Iraq in '91
Then Bosnia, then Afghanistan
Iraq again, then Libya
You want the same for Syria, but gave them terror
A fake Jihad
Another plan that's gone bad
And then Iran for Israel
to create a Zionist hell
Ohh oohh
You like to think that you're immune to the stuff...oh yeah
It's closer to the truth to say you always want more
You know you're gonna have to face it
You're addicted to war
Might as well face it, you're addicted to war
Might as well face it, you're addicted to war
Might as well face it, you're addicted to war
Might as well face it, you're addicted to war
Might as well face it, you're addicted to war
THE VOICE OF ISRAEL
Hmm.
Are you 100% sure that it really is The Voice of Israel and not that of an impostor?
Someone like Mossad?
Are you 100% sure that it really is The Voice of Israel and not that of an impostor?
Someone like Mossad?
Wednesday, February 11, 2015
I SWEAR WITH MY HAND ON MY HEART
I can swear with my hand on my heart that nobody has given me any money in return for any services or writing published on this blog.
I do not advertise for finance, like some.
I do not display a Donate button or something similar, asking for donations.
I do not advertise and/or sell products for revenue, or am employed by anyone who does.
In the last 16 years my income has only come from learning to teach maths and teaching maths, and from mathematics-related research.
Everything on this blog is me and nothing but me: from historical research to opinion to music.
Me.
I wish could say the same for everyone else...
Perhaps if there were no donations of any kind then the truth would prevail...
I do not advertise for finance, like some.
I do not display a Donate button or something similar, asking for donations.
I do not advertise and/or sell products for revenue, or am employed by anyone who does.
In the last 16 years my income has only come from learning to teach maths and teaching maths, and from mathematics-related research.
Everything on this blog is me and nothing but me: from historical research to opinion to music.
Me.
I wish could say the same for everyone else...
Perhaps if there were no donations of any kind then the truth would prevail...
PRINCE CHARLES LOVES SAUDI ARABIA
He's there again!!
At our expense!!
But what is he plotting in person that he dare not discuss over the phone?
Remember that Saudi Arabia has a new King who must have his orders!!!
At our expense!!
But what is he plotting in person that he dare not discuss over the phone?
Remember that Saudi Arabia has a new King who must have his orders!!!
HOW TO NOT ATTRACT ATTENTION TO YOURSELF WHEN YOU ARE ABOUT TO MURDER SOMEONE
I know that the title of this blog sounds sinister.
But according to the Litvinenko Inquiry, with MI5 gimp Tam and dodgy Emmerson as QCs, the suspects Kovtun and Lugovoi dressed like clowns before their alleged first attempt at murdering Litvinenko.
So we have the suspects:
1. dressing like clowns to attract attention to themselves;
2. telling their son to shake hands with the person they have just murdered, with Polonium 210 all over the place.
Make sense?
But how about this:
On whose advice? And for what reason? And was their luggage checked for suspicious substances?
But according to the Litvinenko Inquiry, with MI5 gimp Tam and dodgy Emmerson as QCs, the suspects Kovtun and Lugovoi dressed like clowns before their alleged first attempt at murdering Litvinenko.
Giving evidence, the hotel’s manager, Goran Krgo, said he spotted Lugovoi and Kovtun the moment they arrived. “I remember these guests quite vividly,” he told the inquiry on Wednesday. Asked to elaborate, he said: “We found them to be quite comical on account of how they were dressed and the excessive jewellery they were wearing.”
[source : Litvinenko killers left radiation trail across London, inquiry told, The Guardian, http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/feb/11/litvinenko-killers-radiation-trail-london-inquiry, 11th February 2015]
So we have the suspects:
1. dressing like clowns to attract attention to themselves;
2. telling their son to shake hands with the person they have just murdered, with Polonium 210 all over the place.
Make sense?
But how about this:
Giving evidence, Det Con Spencer Scott said he stopped both men at immigration control. He said: “I thought they were of interest.”
He questioned them for 20 minutes. “They were very evasive as to why they were going to the UK,” he said, adding they “gave one-word answers”.
Scott said he let them enter the country after confirming that their business meeting was genuine. “I was given advice I should allow them to go through,” he said.
On whose advice? And for what reason? And was their luggage checked for suspicious substances?
PRIORITIES STILL ALL WRONG
In addition to the meagre number of staff employed to hunt down wealthy tax dodgers compared to the several orders of magnitude larger number of staff employed to hunt down benefits cheats we now have this:
Alleged benefit cheats arrested in early morning raid - VIP paedophiles sleep soundly in bed: http://t.co/CBKDQlPBOr pic.twitter.com/E6r79r8Oti
— David Icke (@davidicke) February 11, 2015SELF PROCLAIMED MAVERICK ZAC GOLDSMITH SHOULD ASK FOR HIS MONEY BACK
Zac Rothschild Goldsmith has been dragged into the HSBC Swiss Bank account scandal but claims to have paid all of his taxes and that he has not sought or been given tax dodging advice by HSBC. But the money he is given from HSBC comes from a trust which I assume was created and is administered by someone. So did they on behalf of the Rothschilds Goldsmiths seek advice or were given advice on tax dodging from HSBC?
Whatever.
Goldsmith's contributions to The Conservative Party are now in the spotlight. Half a million quid it is apparently.
Goldsmith has been at the front of the pack demanding an investigation into Whitehall child abuse, and been a superstar guest on Russia Today. But the inquiry established by Theresa May has been a national embarrassment.
So will Goldsmith ask for his money back from The Conservative Party?
Now that WOULD be maverick!!!!!!
Whatever.
Goldsmith's contributions to The Conservative Party are now in the spotlight. Half a million quid it is apparently.
Goldsmith has been at the front of the pack demanding an investigation into Whitehall child abuse, and been a superstar guest on Russia Today. But the inquiry established by Theresa May has been a national embarrassment.
So will Goldsmith ask for his money back from The Conservative Party?
Now that WOULD be maverick!!!!!!
THE GUARDIAN IS PART OF THE PROBLEM NOT THE SOLUTION
The editorial in The Guardian today focuses on the interview of President Bashar al Assad of Syria by Jeremy Bowen of the BBC. The author of the editorial basically calls Assad a liar and a murderer, and ends with this paragraph:
I would direct the editor of The Guardian to this quote as provided by The Guardian itself:
The editorial does not mention once the following nations:
Israel
USA
Saudi Arabia
Turkey
Qatar
Jordan
France
United Kingdom
Shortly after 9/11 General Wesley Clark was told of a plan for war and regime change in seven nations in five years.
Here is Clark in 2007 revealing that plan:
The nations named to Clark were:
Iraq
Iran
Syria
Lebanon
Sudan
Somalia
Libya
You will note that the plan was possibly conceived as early as 1991 which would explain why Israel wrote A Clean Break in 1996 naming Iraq, Iran, Syria and Hezbollah as targets for war and regime change.
You will also note that of these only one was named as a suspect in 9/11, and that was Iraq. But because the evidence against Iraq was thin it was also accused of aiming WMDs at our backyard barbecues.
As a response to 9/11 there was a little detour into Afghanistan allegedly to get bin Laden but it was actually to restore opium harvests after The Taliban had destroyed the crops. Bin Laden died around Christmas 2001 from Marfan Syndrome but somebody forgot to tell us.
But in 2003 we invaded Iraq but found no evidence of involvement in 9/11 and no evidence of WMDs.
In 2006 Israel waged war on Lebanon but Hezbollah was not destroyed.
So by 2007 this Plan A was moribund due to the invasion of Iraq not going as smoothly as planned or the plan being too optimistic and ambitious. Either way the NATO general public was tired of war. So a Plan B was hatched consisting of the Arab Spring in which there would be 'revolutions' in some Arab countries which would be helped by NATO, or if the leaders of those nations targeted for 'revolution' resisted then a humanitarian crisis would be engineered and then NATO would have to bomb people to liberate them.
So in 2007 an agreement was reached between the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia that the latter would unleash the nastiest international cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria, Lebanon and Iran.
In 2009 the British asked former French foreign minister Roland Dumas to help to plan how to smuggle Jihadis into Syria.
However these Jihadis were first unleashed onto Libya, as per the plan revealed to Wesley Clark, and under the banner of The Arab Spring NATO became the Jihadi Air Force protecting and assisting what was essentially al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb.
After Libya these Jihadis were smuggled into Syria via Turkey and Lebanon.
And there they have remained, at first apparently winning but since June 2013 being heavily defeated despite receiving funding from Saudi Arabia and Qatar, weapons and training from the USA in Jordan, medical and military assistance from Israel, and Turkey giving them virtually free passage through the Turkey-Syria border, and in some cases bombing Syrian positions to help the Jihadis enter Syria!! This is why Prince Bandar threatened Putin in the summer of 2013 that he Bandar would unleash hell in Syria is Putin didn't dump Assad. On 21st August 2013 Bandar unleashed hell in Ghouta. And this is why the price of oil has been drastically reduced as part of an economic war on Russia to persuade Russia to dump Assad, in addition to all the sanctions etc. And this is why the Jihadis have morphed into what is essentially an even more barbaric colony of Saudi Arabia in Syria and Iraq.
9/11 was supposed to redraw the energy map of the world under Zionism. The war in Syria is all about a pipeline from the Pars gas field to Europe: NATO and its Gulf and Zionist allies want a pipeline from Qatar through Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Syria and Turkey, with a branch into Israel, so that Russia's energy business with Europe can be disrupted; but Assad wants a pipeline from Iran through Iraq, Syria, Lebanon and onto Europe but not threatening Russia's business.
This is why The Guardian dumped Nafeez Ahmed when he exposed the true reason for the war on Gaza last year: Israel needs energy but hasn't got it, but the Palestinians have but can't exploit it.
But the plans for war have all failed spectacularly.
FAILED!!!
FAILED!!!
FAILED!!!
But all this escapes The Guardian as it violates its founding principles as stated in the History of The Guardian.
Why would The Guardian betray this journalistic integrity?
Who is the editor of The Guardian?
Who would refuse to tell you all this while blaming Assad for the deaths of over 200,000 Syrians and creating millions of Syrian refugees?
Who thinks that a nation should not be allowed to protect and defend its national sovereignty against international cutthroat cannibal Jihadis and instead bow down before the Empire and kiss its feet?
Ladies and gentlemen, meet Jonathan Freedland, who was on the BBC's Get Galloway programme, a.k.a. BBC QT.
Freedland is on the far right (of this image).
Freedland is a Jew. He pretends to be against Israel but said fuck all last year as Israel murdered over 2000 people in Gaza, over 500 of them children, and does not tell you all of the above.
So you tell me: is The Guardian part of the solution or part of the problem?
Are we being told sacred facts?
Er, nope.
When the turmoil began in Syria, Mr Assad reacted by declaring that he would bring the whole Middle East to a state of chaos. He has contributed to doing just that. He is getting away with it. Everyone knows that there is not, and may never have been, an easy solution. But sticking one’s head in the sand and hoping the war on Isis will bring peace to Syria is a delusional approach. Syrian civilians are not helped when the west has no credible strategy to offer beyond air strikes on Isis and letting military data be communicated to the Assad regime. Nor are the Sunni constituencies that the coalition is supposed to rally against Isis ever going to be convinced of the efficiency of the strategy if Mr Assad, supported by Iran and Russia, is allowed to portray himself as part of a common fight. He is, as ever, part of the problem, not the solution.
[source : The Guardian view on Bashar al-Assad’s BBC interview: the lies of a tyrant, The Guardian, http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/feb/10/guardian-view-bashar-al-assad-bbc-interview-lies-tyrant, 10th February 2015]
I would direct the editor of The Guardian to this quote as provided by The Guardian itself:
"Comment is free, but facts are sacred... The voice of opponents no less than that of friends has a right to be heard."
[source : History of the Guardian, The Guardian, http://www.theguardian.com/gnm-archive/2002/jun/06/1, Accessed 11th February 2015]
The editorial does not mention once the following nations:
Israel
USA
Saudi Arabia
Turkey
Qatar
Jordan
France
United Kingdom
Shortly after 9/11 General Wesley Clark was told of a plan for war and regime change in seven nations in five years.
Here is Clark in 2007 revealing that plan:
The nations named to Clark were:
Iraq
Iran
Syria
Lebanon
Sudan
Somalia
Libya
You will note that the plan was possibly conceived as early as 1991 which would explain why Israel wrote A Clean Break in 1996 naming Iraq, Iran, Syria and Hezbollah as targets for war and regime change.
You will also note that of these only one was named as a suspect in 9/11, and that was Iraq. But because the evidence against Iraq was thin it was also accused of aiming WMDs at our backyard barbecues.
As a response to 9/11 there was a little detour into Afghanistan allegedly to get bin Laden but it was actually to restore opium harvests after The Taliban had destroyed the crops. Bin Laden died around Christmas 2001 from Marfan Syndrome but somebody forgot to tell us.
But in 2003 we invaded Iraq but found no evidence of involvement in 9/11 and no evidence of WMDs.
In 2006 Israel waged war on Lebanon but Hezbollah was not destroyed.
So by 2007 this Plan A was moribund due to the invasion of Iraq not going as smoothly as planned or the plan being too optimistic and ambitious. Either way the NATO general public was tired of war. So a Plan B was hatched consisting of the Arab Spring in which there would be 'revolutions' in some Arab countries which would be helped by NATO, or if the leaders of those nations targeted for 'revolution' resisted then a humanitarian crisis would be engineered and then NATO would have to bomb people to liberate them.
So in 2007 an agreement was reached between the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia that the latter would unleash the nastiest international cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria, Lebanon and Iran.
In 2009 the British asked former French foreign minister Roland Dumas to help to plan how to smuggle Jihadis into Syria.
However these Jihadis were first unleashed onto Libya, as per the plan revealed to Wesley Clark, and under the banner of The Arab Spring NATO became the Jihadi Air Force protecting and assisting what was essentially al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb.
After Libya these Jihadis were smuggled into Syria via Turkey and Lebanon.
And there they have remained, at first apparently winning but since June 2013 being heavily defeated despite receiving funding from Saudi Arabia and Qatar, weapons and training from the USA in Jordan, medical and military assistance from Israel, and Turkey giving them virtually free passage through the Turkey-Syria border, and in some cases bombing Syrian positions to help the Jihadis enter Syria!! This is why Prince Bandar threatened Putin in the summer of 2013 that he Bandar would unleash hell in Syria is Putin didn't dump Assad. On 21st August 2013 Bandar unleashed hell in Ghouta. And this is why the price of oil has been drastically reduced as part of an economic war on Russia to persuade Russia to dump Assad, in addition to all the sanctions etc. And this is why the Jihadis have morphed into what is essentially an even more barbaric colony of Saudi Arabia in Syria and Iraq.
9/11 was supposed to redraw the energy map of the world under Zionism. The war in Syria is all about a pipeline from the Pars gas field to Europe: NATO and its Gulf and Zionist allies want a pipeline from Qatar through Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Syria and Turkey, with a branch into Israel, so that Russia's energy business with Europe can be disrupted; but Assad wants a pipeline from Iran through Iraq, Syria, Lebanon and onto Europe but not threatening Russia's business.
This is why The Guardian dumped Nafeez Ahmed when he exposed the true reason for the war on Gaza last year: Israel needs energy but hasn't got it, but the Palestinians have but can't exploit it.
But the plans for war have all failed spectacularly.
FAILED!!!
FAILED!!!
FAILED!!!
But all this escapes The Guardian as it violates its founding principles as stated in the History of The Guardian.
The Guardian achieved national and international recognition under the editorship of CP Scott, who held the post for 57 years from 1872. Scott bought the paper in 1907 following the death of Taylor's son, and pledged that the principles laid down in the founder's will would be upheld by retaining the independence of the newspaper. CP Scott outlined those principals in a much-quoted article written to celebrate the centenary of the paper: "Comment is free, but facts are sacred... The voice of opponents no less than that of friends has a right to be heard."
Why would The Guardian betray this journalistic integrity?
Who is the editor of The Guardian?
Who would refuse to tell you all this while blaming Assad for the deaths of over 200,000 Syrians and creating millions of Syrian refugees?
Who thinks that a nation should not be allowed to protect and defend its national sovereignty against international cutthroat cannibal Jihadis and instead bow down before the Empire and kiss its feet?
Ladies and gentlemen, meet Jonathan Freedland, who was on the BBC's Get Galloway programme, a.k.a. BBC QT.
Freedland is on the far right (of this image).
This photo says it all...... @georgegalloway pic.twitter.com/ucafOez9ZJ
— Team George Galloway (@TeamGeorgeG) February 10, 2015Freedland is a Jew. He pretends to be against Israel but said fuck all last year as Israel murdered over 2000 people in Gaza, over 500 of them children, and does not tell you all of the above.
So you tell me: is The Guardian part of the solution or part of the problem?
Are we being told sacred facts?
Er, nope.
Tuesday, February 10, 2015
HSBC
HSBC was founded to facilitate the opium trade. The H and S stand for Hong Kong and Shanghai. This was after The Opium wars in which Britain forced China to accept opium as an import in order to drug it to death.
Callous Cameron's great grandfather Ewen ran this drug bank from London.
In the files on tax dodgers we find small fry, such as Elle McPherson and Fernando Alonso).
But what about these?
Prince Michael of Kent, Grand Master Mason.
Prince Bandar, suspect in 9/11 and Ghouta.
Callous Cameron's great grandfather Ewen ran this drug bank from London.
In the files on tax dodgers we find small fry, such as Elle McPherson and Fernando Alonso).
But what about these?
Prince Michael of Kent, Grand Master Mason.
Prince Bandar, suspect in 9/11 and Ghouta.
Monday, February 09, 2015
IN ONE WORD WHY ARMING THE KIEV NAZIS IS A VERY BAD IDEA
Syria.
The rebels in Syria have been armed, financed, trained, advised and assisted by the USA, Israel, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Turkey, and not forgetting this Disunited Fascist Queendom, for 4 years now. Has that worked? Er, nope. Did that end the 'civil war'? Er, nope.
All it has done has led to an (over) estimate of 210000 dead, millions of refugees and the creation of the Islamic State. So well done you guys!! Way to go Saudi Arabia (mates of Prince Charles)! Woooh!
But that's what the weapons manufacturers and their salesmen the warmongers want: blood; trauma; beheadings; terror; fear; shattered corpses.
The rebels in Syria have been armed, financed, trained, advised and assisted by the USA, Israel, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Turkey, and not forgetting this Disunited Fascist Queendom, for 4 years now. Has that worked? Er, nope. Did that end the 'civil war'? Er, nope.
All it has done has led to an (over) estimate of 210000 dead, millions of refugees and the creation of the Islamic State. So well done you guys!! Way to go Saudi Arabia (mates of Prince Charles)! Woooh!
But that's what the weapons manufacturers and their salesmen the warmongers want: blood; trauma; beheadings; terror; fear; shattered corpses.
GETTING PRIORITIES ALL WRONG
Some of the figures have changed a little bit, e.g. some estimates are that it is over £ 200 billion in tax evasion, but this sums it all up perfectly.
And not forgetting the bedroom tax and sanctions that have led to many deaths and suicides due to hardship.
And not forgetting the bedroom tax and sanctions that have led to many deaths and suicides due to hardship.
300 staff at HMRC investigating tax evasion of £70bn, while 3,250 staff at DWP investigating benefit fraud of £1.2bn pic.twitter.com/fum8mh3icy
— Scott Nelson (@TheMockneyRebel) February 8, 2015Sunday, February 08, 2015
JUST TO MAKE SURE THAT WE ARE NOT ALL GOING MAD
Just to make sure that we are not all going mad, here are the recordings of phone intercepts and the transcripts of those recordings that were released just a few hours after MH17 came down. They were apparently recorded by and released by the Ukraine Security Service. The Kiev Nazis swore that these recordings proved 100% beyond doubt that MH17 was shot down by Cossacks at Chernukino.
I am republishing these because I still cannot believe that after all this time the USA has not released the data from 'sensors' that it says it has that it says shows that a missile fired from the Shnizhne area brought down MH17. Instead the USA published an image of an arc and a straight line intersecting over the area north of Torez.
It is these recordings and transcripts that led to a huge wave of sanctions against Russia from late July 2014 onwards.
Yet the USA released an image implying that Shnizhne not Chernukino was the origin of a missile.
So we slap loads of sanctions on Russia that threaten our own economy based on these tapes and an image that a schooolkid could knock up in a minute, both of which blatantly contradict each other.
Make sense?
Well, so far nobody has proved that MH17 was shot down by a BUK. Claims that MH17 was shot down by a BUK missile have been made due to a video of a BUK system filmed allegedly at dawn on 18th July in Luhansk by someone connected to the Ukraine Security Service. The BUK in that video had only 3 missiles not the usual 4, thus implying that that BUK was the one that brought down MH17.
And yes, that's the same Ukraine Security Service who released those tapes which are contradicted by that devastatingly persuasive image released by the USA.
However, there are several witnesses who have gone on camera to state that fighter jets were close to MH17 when it crashed. But for some strange reason, and I can't think why, the Ukraine Air Force refuses to open up their log books of military flights for 17th July.
But if it turns out that MH17 was indeed shot down by a BUK then maybe the allegations in this video should be examined, that the Ukraine military was in the area with BUKs, which Russia claims was the case.
Ukraine's BUKs and Ukraine's air force are being completely ignored by most if not all NATO media and their willing servants and wannabes.
And yes, that's the same Ukraine who is running the investigation into MH17 with founding member of NATO the Netherlands.
And yes, that's the same NATO which has wanted Ukraine in NATO for decades so NATO can plonk first strike nuclear missiles aimed at Moscow on Russia's doorstep, thus bringing a cataclysmic WW3 one step closer.
Sleep tight.
I am republishing these because I still cannot believe that after all this time the USA has not released the data from 'sensors' that it says it has that it says shows that a missile fired from the Shnizhne area brought down MH17. Instead the USA published an image of an arc and a straight line intersecting over the area north of Torez.
Ukrainian authorities have released what they say are intercepted phone conversations between pro-Russian separatists and what appear to be Russian military officers saying that separatists shot down Malaysia Airlines flight MH17.
The Ukrainian Security Service put the Russian-language conversations on Youtube within hours of the crash.
The veracity of the recordings cannot be confirmed.
First Recording
[Male voice, identified as separatist leader Igor Bezler] The group of the Miner [an alias] has just shot down a plane, which came down just behind Yenakiyevo.
[Col Geranin] Pilots. Where are the pilots?
[Bezler] Gone to search for and photograph the plane. It's smoking.
[Second male voice, identified as Russian military intelligence Colonel Vasily Geranin] How many minutes ago?
[Bezler] About 30 minutes ago
Second Recording
[Male voice, captioned as "The Greek" ] Yes, Major.
[Major] Well, the Chernukhino lads shot down the plane.
[Greek] Who shot it down?
[Major] From the Chernukhino roadblock. The Cossacks at Chernukhino.
[Greek] Yes, Major.
[Major] Well, the plane fell apart in the air, near the Pertropavlovskaya coal mine. The first casualty 200 [military jargon for dead body] has been found. A civilian.
[Greek] Well, what do you have there?
[Major] Basically it was 100% a civilian aircraft.
[Greek] Are many people there?
[Major] [Curses] The debris fell right into backyard.
[Greek] What kind of aircraft?
[Major] I have not figured this out yet because I haven't been close to the main body of the debris. I am only looking where the first bodies began to fall. There are the remnants of inner brackets, chairs and bodies there.
[Greek] I see. Any weaponry there?
[Major] Nothing at all. Civilian things, medical bits and bobs, towels, toilet paper.
[Greek] Any documents?
[Major] Yes. From an Indonesian student. From Thompson University [curses].
Third Recording
[Male voice, identified as a fighter] Regarding the plane shot down in the area of Snezhnoye-Torez. It's a civilian one. Fell down near Grabovo. There are lots of corpses of women and children. The Cossacks are out there looking at all this.
They say on TV it's a Ukrainian AN-26 transport plane, but they say it's got Malaysia Airlines written on the plane. What was it doing in Ukrainian territory?
[Male voice, identified as Cossack commander Nikolai Kozitsyn] That means they were carrying spies. They shouldn't be [curses] flying. There is a war going on.
[source : MH17 crash: Ukraine releases alleged intercepts, BBC, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-28362872, 18th July 2014]
It is these recordings and transcripts that led to a huge wave of sanctions against Russia from late July 2014 onwards.
Yet the USA released an image implying that Shnizhne not Chernukino was the origin of a missile.
So we slap loads of sanctions on Russia that threaten our own economy based on these tapes and an image that a schooolkid could knock up in a minute, both of which blatantly contradict each other.
Make sense?
Well, so far nobody has proved that MH17 was shot down by a BUK. Claims that MH17 was shot down by a BUK missile have been made due to a video of a BUK system filmed allegedly at dawn on 18th July in Luhansk by someone connected to the Ukraine Security Service. The BUK in that video had only 3 missiles not the usual 4, thus implying that that BUK was the one that brought down MH17.
And yes, that's the same Ukraine Security Service who released those tapes which are contradicted by that devastatingly persuasive image released by the USA.
However, there are several witnesses who have gone on camera to state that fighter jets were close to MH17 when it crashed. But for some strange reason, and I can't think why, the Ukraine Air Force refuses to open up their log books of military flights for 17th July.
But if it turns out that MH17 was indeed shot down by a BUK then maybe the allegations in this video should be examined, that the Ukraine military was in the area with BUKs, which Russia claims was the case.
Ukraine's BUKs and Ukraine's air force are being completely ignored by most if not all NATO media and their willing servants and wannabes.
And yes, that's the same Ukraine who is running the investigation into MH17 with founding member of NATO the Netherlands.
And yes, that's the same NATO which has wanted Ukraine in NATO for decades so NATO can plonk first strike nuclear missiles aimed at Moscow on Russia's doorstep, thus bringing a cataclysmic WW3 one step closer.
Sleep tight.
THIS EXARONEWS REPORT DOES NOT SHOW EMMERSON IN A GOOD LIGHT
Ben Emmerson, counsel to #CSAinquiry, was remarkably silent throughout Theresa May’s final meeting with panel. 1/6 http://t.co/a3HMTyRntz
— ExaroNews (@ExaroNews) February 8, 2015The more we examine Emmerson's behaviour the more we understand why Theresa May appointed him not only as counsel to the historic child abuse inquiry but also to the Litvinenko Inquiry.
It is absolutely crystal clear that the British government has not wanted an inquiry into the death of Alexander Litvinenko. He died in November 2006 yet it is only now over 8 years later that an inquiry is being held into his death, despite many calls for such from his wife and other concerned parties. This is on a similar scale to the inquiry into the death of Diana (and most of the UK thinks that she was murdered by you know who). And of all the QCs she could have appointed May appoints one prepared to represent MI5 against one of the finest journalists on the planet, Tony Gosling.
And so far the bumbling and 'errors' of Theresa May have also ensured that it will now take years before any report on Whitehall kiddie-fiddling and murder is issued, and that very curiously and suspiciously the scope of the inquiry has been widened to include Rotherham. But if Rotherham why not Rochdale and Oxford too? Each of these scandals should have their own unique inquiry...preferably not with Emmerson as Counsel to any of them.
PLUMES OF SMOKE ON 17TH JULY 2014
Currently there are 3 proposed launch sites of the missile that allegedly shot down MH17:
1. Chernukuino, proposed by the Kiev Nazis of The Ukraine Security Services based on alleged intercepts of phone calls;
2. a field 5 Km south of Shnizhne, proposed by Belling Cat, RTL Nieuws, Ukraine@War, and others, based on geolocation and some photographs of a plume of smoke;
3. a field 3 Km north of Shnizhne, proposed by Correctiv and Der Spiegel based on eyewitnesses.
Last week I modelled the movement of the plume of smoke from the launch site proposed in 2. above, and varied the wind speed and time of photograph, and consequently expressed my doubts about the authenticity of the photographs used in 2. based on the timescales given.
Here is what the photographer said in an interview with RTL Nieuws:
We can assume that the first explosion was MH17 bursting into flames from whatever hit it, and the second explosion was MH17 hitting the ground.
Note that the photographer says that it could be as little as 30 seconds after the explosions, i.e. the second explosion when MH17 hit the ground, that the now infamous photograph of the plume of white smoke was taken.
OK?
So let's assume that it took 15 seconds from launch for the missile to hit MH17 (assuming that MH17 was hit by a SAM such as a BUK). This is the first explosion heard by the photographer. Then a further 15 seconds for MH17 to hit the ground, the second explosion heard by the photographer. And then 30 seconds for him to take the photograph. So by the time the photographer takes the photograph a minute has elapsed since launch.
What would a plume of smoke look like a minute after launch in that area on that day?
Well we can see!!!!
Because someone working in a mine a few Kms west of Torez videoed the crash.
Here is that video. It lasts just short of a minute but starts just as MH17 hits the ground. That should give a good idea as to how far a plume of smoke would move on that day: the crash site and proposed launch site were about 6 miles apart.
Now contrast that with the photograph below which shows a plume moving from a field several Kms away.
This is just my opinion but the plume in the photograph appears to have moved much further from its source than the plume in the video.
Not very scientific I know, but we have on video a timescale of a minute to show approximately what a plume of smoke would look like a minute after its creation. And as I said last week, I am not convinced. The photographer could have his times wrong?
And also note that the video was filmed several Kms west of Torez. The white plume of smoke in the photograph would be very visible to the men making that video but they apparently do not see it...just like everyone else in the area at that time. But it just so happens that someone connected to the Ukraine Security Service takes a photograph of the plume. Hmmm...
1. Chernukuino, proposed by the Kiev Nazis of The Ukraine Security Services based on alleged intercepts of phone calls;
2. a field 5 Km south of Shnizhne, proposed by Belling Cat, RTL Nieuws, Ukraine@War, and others, based on geolocation and some photographs of a plume of smoke;
3. a field 3 Km north of Shnizhne, proposed by Correctiv and Der Spiegel based on eyewitnesses.
Last week I modelled the movement of the plume of smoke from the launch site proposed in 2. above, and varied the wind speed and time of photograph, and consequently expressed my doubts about the authenticity of the photographs used in 2. based on the timescales given.
Here is what the photographer said in an interview with RTL Nieuws:
Can you explain what you experienced on July 17th?
"That day did not foretell anything special would happen. In the morning I woke up and went to my work. At four ó clock in the afternoon I arrived home. And at 16:20 we heard an explosion. The first explosion was not very heavy. 15 seconds later, something like that, there was a second explosion, which was louder and it made the windows shake."
What did you do when you heard the explosion?
"Explosions were no exception anymore. But this was totally different, that explosion. It did not sound like anything we heard before. I immediately wanted to look where the sound came from. What had exploded? Where? What? How? I ran to the covered balcony. I looked around en saw nothing.
I photographed that white trail in the air. At that moment I did not know what it meant. For me it was just a white trail: from the horizon up into the clouds where it diverged. Only after a while it became clear what it was."
How much time was there between the explosion and the photo?
"That was a minute after the explosions, I think. Maybe even less, something like 30 seconds."
We can assume that the first explosion was MH17 bursting into flames from whatever hit it, and the second explosion was MH17 hitting the ground.
Note that the photographer says that it could be as little as 30 seconds after the explosions, i.e. the second explosion when MH17 hit the ground, that the now infamous photograph of the plume of white smoke was taken.
OK?
So let's assume that it took 15 seconds from launch for the missile to hit MH17 (assuming that MH17 was hit by a SAM such as a BUK). This is the first explosion heard by the photographer. Then a further 15 seconds for MH17 to hit the ground, the second explosion heard by the photographer. And then 30 seconds for him to take the photograph. So by the time the photographer takes the photograph a minute has elapsed since launch.
What would a plume of smoke look like a minute after launch in that area on that day?
Well we can see!!!!
Because someone working in a mine a few Kms west of Torez videoed the crash.
Here is that video. It lasts just short of a minute but starts just as MH17 hits the ground. That should give a good idea as to how far a plume of smoke would move on that day: the crash site and proposed launch site were about 6 miles apart.
Now contrast that with the photograph below which shows a plume moving from a field several Kms away.
This is just my opinion but the plume in the photograph appears to have moved much further from its source than the plume in the video.
Not very scientific I know, but we have on video a timescale of a minute to show approximately what a plume of smoke would look like a minute after its creation. And as I said last week, I am not convinced. The photographer could have his times wrong?
And also note that the video was filmed several Kms west of Torez. The white plume of smoke in the photograph would be very visible to the men making that video but they apparently do not see it...just like everyone else in the area at that time. But it just so happens that someone connected to the Ukraine Security Service takes a photograph of the plume. Hmmm...
PRINCE CHARLES MEDIA BLITZ RESULTS IN A FARCE
Prince Charles seems to have been in the media a lot this last week, a lot more than usual.
Are we being prepared for a transition?
Anyway, Charles has told Muslims in Britain to respect our laws. Fair enough, you might think. Yeah, they should respect our laws. Everyone, including the Royal Family themselves, should respect the laws, of the state, even if that state is a state of the USA...
But let's turn that statement back on him. Should he respect the laws of other nations? Nations like, er, shall we say...SYRIA?
In 2013 the former French foreign minister Roland Dumas admitted to French Parliamentary Channel LCP that he was asked by British security services in 2009 to help them to plan and organise the smuggling of Jihadis into Syria.
That was in 2009.
Two years earlier in 2007 Seymour Hersh had reported that the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia had agreed that such Jihadis would be unleashed onto Syria, Iran and Lebanon. Charles has been filmed doing a little dance, making a little love and getting down with the Saudis as they pranced around with swords, looking rather menacing. The Saudis were made by Great Britain, and take their orders from Liz, soon Charles.
And I propose that this 2007 agreement was reached because by 2007 the plan for war and regime change in seven nations in five years, as revealed to General Wesley Clark, was moribund, with only 2 wars (Iraq and Lebanon) and 1 regime change (Iraq). The nations named to Clark were Iraq, Iran, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Sudan and Somalia. The first four were named in a Zionist warmongering document entitled A Clean Break, Libya was a known enemy of Israel. Sudan and Somalia are the unknowns (to me at least), but I suspect oil off the coast of Somalia is a possible reason.
Charles has also visited the Zaatari refugee camp and called it a 'nightmare'. A nightmare that he and his Saudi mates created?
Charles has also expressed his concern at young British Muslims seeking adventure in joining Jihad in Iraq and Syria. But for decades now Great Britain has had a Covenant of Security with the Jihadis that as long as they serve British foreign policy then they could operate out of and recruit in Great Britain. This led to London being called Londonistan. Osama bin Laden had a mansion in Wembley. And it is current British foreign policy that President Assad of Syria be ousted to make way for a pipeline from the Pars field starting in Qatar so that Dave's new mates, the Qatar Royal family, can buy up London and reduce Russia's influence in Europe.
The British Security Services and Saudi Arabia take their orders from Liz not Parliament. Just this week GCHQ's policy of mass surveillance was deemed unlawful.
It's all a farce: money, war, the war on terror. Everything.
We create our own monsters to go to war to slay but also cite them as a reason for the police state.
Are we being prepared for a transition?
Anyway, Charles has told Muslims in Britain to respect our laws. Fair enough, you might think. Yeah, they should respect our laws. Everyone, including the Royal Family themselves, should respect the laws, of the state, even if that state is a state of the USA...
But let's turn that statement back on him. Should he respect the laws of other nations? Nations like, er, shall we say...SYRIA?
In 2013 the former French foreign minister Roland Dumas admitted to French Parliamentary Channel LCP that he was asked by British security services in 2009 to help them to plan and organise the smuggling of Jihadis into Syria.
That was in 2009.
Two years earlier in 2007 Seymour Hersh had reported that the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia had agreed that such Jihadis would be unleashed onto Syria, Iran and Lebanon. Charles has been filmed doing a little dance, making a little love and getting down with the Saudis as they pranced around with swords, looking rather menacing. The Saudis were made by Great Britain, and take their orders from Liz, soon Charles.
And I propose that this 2007 agreement was reached because by 2007 the plan for war and regime change in seven nations in five years, as revealed to General Wesley Clark, was moribund, with only 2 wars (Iraq and Lebanon) and 1 regime change (Iraq). The nations named to Clark were Iraq, Iran, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Sudan and Somalia. The first four were named in a Zionist warmongering document entitled A Clean Break, Libya was a known enemy of Israel. Sudan and Somalia are the unknowns (to me at least), but I suspect oil off the coast of Somalia is a possible reason.
Charles has also visited the Zaatari refugee camp and called it a 'nightmare'. A nightmare that he and his Saudi mates created?
Charles has also expressed his concern at young British Muslims seeking adventure in joining Jihad in Iraq and Syria. But for decades now Great Britain has had a Covenant of Security with the Jihadis that as long as they serve British foreign policy then they could operate out of and recruit in Great Britain. This led to London being called Londonistan. Osama bin Laden had a mansion in Wembley. And it is current British foreign policy that President Assad of Syria be ousted to make way for a pipeline from the Pars field starting in Qatar so that Dave's new mates, the Qatar Royal family, can buy up London and reduce Russia's influence in Europe.
The British Security Services and Saudi Arabia take their orders from Liz not Parliament. Just this week GCHQ's policy of mass surveillance was deemed unlawful.
It's all a farce: money, war, the war on terror. Everything.
We create our own monsters to go to war to slay but also cite them as a reason for the police state.
Saturday, February 07, 2015
LIFE REALLY IS A PIECE OF SHIT WHEN YOU SIT DOWN AND LOOK AT IT
Yeah, always look on the bright side of life, even when you're being bombed with phosphorous by the brave Israeli Air Force, even when you're suffering brutal fascist Bilderberg austerity to pay for bank bailouts while the bankers get mega bonsues, even when you're a brave Syrian officer having your head sawn off by a Saudi-sponsored, demonically possessed international cutthroat Jihadi, and even when your house is being shelled by NATO-sponsored Kiev Nazis.
But especially when your faith and belief in love and the human race is seriously shaken.
Always look on the bright side of life
But especially when your faith and belief in love and the human race is seriously shaken.
Always look on the bright side of life
NATO GLADIO TERRORISM
Listen to this.
I also believe that NATO has already committed its first Gladio operation in Ukraine when protestors were shot dead in Kiev which was then used by the neo-Nazis to storm government buildings, set them ablaze and chase out Yanukovich.
Charlie Hebdo police officer Helric Fredou murdered? NATO Gladio Daniele Ganser
I also believe that NATO has already committed its first Gladio operation in Ukraine when protestors were shot dead in Kiev which was then used by the neo-Nazis to storm government buildings, set them ablaze and chase out Yanukovich.
Charlie Hebdo police officer Helric Fredou murdered? NATO Gladio Daniele Ganser
NO WONDER BREEDLOVE THREATENS WAR OVER UKRAINE
First it was conscription of men of a particular range.
But thousands have been dodging the draft.
So a law was passed that deserters could be shot.
And now women are being drafted.
No wonder NATO's Breedlove is threatening war with Russia over Ukraine!!
And anyone with half a brain cell can answer the following question correctly:
Look at this graphic very closely. Examine it thoroughly.
Who is expanding and imperialist: Russia or NATO?
If you answered NATO then give yourself a pat on the back because you are absolutely correct.
NATO has been expanding and expanding and expanding, from an initial hardcore membership of just five nations, NATO is now engaging in a covert war with Russia over Ukraine. Just over a year ago the current Prime Minister of Ukraine was just a leader of a minor party in the Rada. But he is now Prime Minister, getting his history wrong, and begging for Ukraine to join NATO. So what is behind his meteoric rise to power? He is sponsored by NATO and was hand-picked by Victoria Kagan-Nuland, wife of Robert Kagan, co-founder of PNAC, the source of 9/11 and the subsequent wars. And while nobody was watching, just before Christmas Ukraine took one step closer to joining NATO by repealing a law forbidding Ukraine from joining NATO.
But thousands have been dodging the draft.
So a law was passed that deserters could be shot.
And now women are being drafted.
No wonder NATO's Breedlove is threatening war with Russia over Ukraine!!
And anyone with half a brain cell can answer the following question correctly:
Look at this graphic very closely. Examine it thoroughly.
Who is expanding and imperialist: Russia or NATO?
If you answered NATO then give yourself a pat on the back because you are absolutely correct.
NATO has been expanding and expanding and expanding, from an initial hardcore membership of just five nations, NATO is now engaging in a covert war with Russia over Ukraine. Just over a year ago the current Prime Minister of Ukraine was just a leader of a minor party in the Rada. But he is now Prime Minister, getting his history wrong, and begging for Ukraine to join NATO. So what is behind his meteoric rise to power? He is sponsored by NATO and was hand-picked by Victoria Kagan-Nuland, wife of Robert Kagan, co-founder of PNAC, the source of 9/11 and the subsequent wars. And while nobody was watching, just before Christmas Ukraine took one step closer to joining NATO by repealing a law forbidding Ukraine from joining NATO.
Friday, February 06, 2015
HOLOCAUST DENIERS
Whenever Israel does anything it always always always wheels out the excuse: The Holocaust.
However, they don't also tell us:
1. initial Jewish settlements in Palestine were financed by the Rothschilds;
2 but before WW2 most Jews did not want to migrate to and populate these settlements in Palestine because they knew the anger it would cause;
3. Hitler and Nazi Germany were the creation of the Anglo-American Establishment with help from the Jewish Warburgs, in particular Max Warburg, who proclaimed himself "King of the Jews";
4. the Warburgs and Rothschilds are very close, and send each others sons to be trained in the others banking houses;
5. so the Warburgs were doing their mates the Rothschilds a favour by organising opposition to international boycotts of Nazi Germany while facilitating migration of German Jews to Palestine through the Haavara in conjunction with the Nazis themselves, financing Hitler through the corporation in which they were majority shareholders, IG Farben, and directing the economy of Nazi Germany through their directorships of the Reichsbank.
If there was a holocaust then the Jewish Warburgs, otherwise known as the Del Bancos of Venice, have a lot to answer for.
But last night on BBC Question Time I saw Jews denying a holocaust.
In about the fifth row from the front in the middle sat three Jewish youths. One of them conveniently was given the opportunity to ask the last question of the show, and it was on anti-Semitism, and accused George Galloway of whipping up hatred against Israel and Jews.
This set up reminded me of Joel Weiner. Joel who? Joel Weiner had applied to be a member of the audience of BBC QT several times, and each time he was denied. However one day he got a call from the BBC and was asked if he would like to be a member of the audience of BBC QT. Funnily enough Weiner got to ask a question on anti-Semitism to a member of the panel called Nick Griffin.
Anyway, back to last night's BBC QT.
Twice the body count of the war on Gaza last year was stated.
And twice did those three Jewish youths deny that body count.
I don't know how many died in the camps in Nazi Europe and at the hands of the Einsatzgruppen. All I'll say is that a lot died. But surely such an atrocity against your own people would make you more sympathetic to the plight of Palestinians, not celebrate during a mass picnic as the brave Israeli Air Force drops phosphorous onto Palestinian children?
Over 500 Palestinian children died at the hands of Israel last year in the space of a few months. The Bakers were bombed as they played football on the beach. Little babies kicking their little legs and waving their little arms, cooing and gurgling and laughing were bombed to little bits by brave Israeli Air Force pilots.
That cannot be denied.
But there they were, those three Jewish youths, denying it.
It makes me so sad.
However, they don't also tell us:
1. initial Jewish settlements in Palestine were financed by the Rothschilds;
2 but before WW2 most Jews did not want to migrate to and populate these settlements in Palestine because they knew the anger it would cause;
3. Hitler and Nazi Germany were the creation of the Anglo-American Establishment with help from the Jewish Warburgs, in particular Max Warburg, who proclaimed himself "King of the Jews";
4. the Warburgs and Rothschilds are very close, and send each others sons to be trained in the others banking houses;
5. so the Warburgs were doing their mates the Rothschilds a favour by organising opposition to international boycotts of Nazi Germany while facilitating migration of German Jews to Palestine through the Haavara in conjunction with the Nazis themselves, financing Hitler through the corporation in which they were majority shareholders, IG Farben, and directing the economy of Nazi Germany through their directorships of the Reichsbank.
If there was a holocaust then the Jewish Warburgs, otherwise known as the Del Bancos of Venice, have a lot to answer for.
But last night on BBC Question Time I saw Jews denying a holocaust.
In about the fifth row from the front in the middle sat three Jewish youths. One of them conveniently was given the opportunity to ask the last question of the show, and it was on anti-Semitism, and accused George Galloway of whipping up hatred against Israel and Jews.
This set up reminded me of Joel Weiner. Joel who? Joel Weiner had applied to be a member of the audience of BBC QT several times, and each time he was denied. However one day he got a call from the BBC and was asked if he would like to be a member of the audience of BBC QT. Funnily enough Weiner got to ask a question on anti-Semitism to a member of the panel called Nick Griffin.
Anyway, back to last night's BBC QT.
Twice the body count of the war on Gaza last year was stated.
And twice did those three Jewish youths deny that body count.
I don't know how many died in the camps in Nazi Europe and at the hands of the Einsatzgruppen. All I'll say is that a lot died. But surely such an atrocity against your own people would make you more sympathetic to the plight of Palestinians, not celebrate during a mass picnic as the brave Israeli Air Force drops phosphorous onto Palestinian children?
Over 500 Palestinian children died at the hands of Israel last year in the space of a few months. The Bakers were bombed as they played football on the beach. Little babies kicking their little legs and waving their little arms, cooing and gurgling and laughing were bombed to little bits by brave Israeli Air Force pilots.
That cannot be denied.
But there they were, those three Jewish youths, denying it.
It makes me so sad.
THE CREDIBILITY OF BEN EMMERSON QC AND THUS THE LITVINENKO INQUIRY JUST TOOK A MASSIVE DIVE
According to the sources of Exaro News, the new head of the Historic Child Abuse Inquiry, which somehow now includes Rotherham, was recommended to Theresa May by Ben Emmerson QC, Counsel to that inquiry and appointed by May to that position.
You would think that being Counsel to perhaps one of the most important inquiries in history would be sufficient. But not for Emmerson, for he is one of the QCs in the Litvinenko Inquiry. The credibility of the Litvinenko Inquiry is already in doubt due to the other QC, Tam, who represented MI5 against Tony Gosling.
However, Emmerson is known as a crusading human rights lawyer, representing clients such as the Bolton Seven and an accused mass murderer of the KLA.
So why did May appoint Emmerson as QC to both the Historic Child Abuse Inquiry and the Litvinenko Inquiry, having appointed a QC who has represented MI5?
And why did Emmerson then recommend Goddard to May to lead the Historic Child Abuse Inquiry?
And why did May keep Emmerson as Counsel to the Historic Child Abuse Inquiry, but sack everyone else?
And what is Emmerson's view on bunging Rotherham child abuse into what should have been a unique inquiry into Whitehall paedophilia?
Anyone who has any concerns about this should read this on David Icke.
Goddard is not a member of the Establishment here but it looks like she is over there.
You would think that being Counsel to perhaps one of the most important inquiries in history would be sufficient. But not for Emmerson, for he is one of the QCs in the Litvinenko Inquiry. The credibility of the Litvinenko Inquiry is already in doubt due to the other QC, Tam, who represented MI5 against Tony Gosling.
However, Emmerson is known as a crusading human rights lawyer, representing clients such as the Bolton Seven and an accused mass murderer of the KLA.
So why did May appoint Emmerson as QC to both the Historic Child Abuse Inquiry and the Litvinenko Inquiry, having appointed a QC who has represented MI5?
And why did Emmerson then recommend Goddard to May to lead the Historic Child Abuse Inquiry?
And why did May keep Emmerson as Counsel to the Historic Child Abuse Inquiry, but sack everyone else?
And what is Emmerson's view on bunging Rotherham child abuse into what should have been a unique inquiry into Whitehall paedophilia?
Anyone who has any concerns about this should read this on David Icke.
Goddard is not a member of the Establishment here but it looks like she is over there.
Thursday, February 05, 2015
FROM DEBT WRITE-OFF TO DEBT RESTRUCTURING AND OTHER BROKEN PROMISES IN ONE EASY STEP
I am half-sceptical, half-optimistic of Syriza.
Half-sceptical because of the pro-Euro policy of Syriza, that they gave the defence ministry to hardline right wingers, and articles on Syriza on WSWS.
Half-optimistic because of the comments of Webster Tarpley.
Here is a comment on WSWS about what appears to be Syriza dumping its core aim of a write off of debt in favour of swapping and restructuring, and other broken promises.
Perhaps this is just real politik. Or maybe it has all been a big fat Greek con. We'll see in a few weeks time when the Greek debt has to be agreed.
Half-sceptical because of the pro-Euro policy of Syriza, that they gave the defence ministry to hardline right wingers, and articles on Syriza on WSWS.
Half-optimistic because of the comments of Webster Tarpley.
Here is a comment on WSWS about what appears to be Syriza dumping its core aim of a write off of debt in favour of swapping and restructuring, and other broken promises.
The announcement by Greek Finance Minister Yannis Varoufakis that the new Syriza-led government will request a “debt swap” rather than a write-off of a large portion of Greece’s €315 billion foreign debt is further confirmation of the regime’s bourgeois character and capitalist programme.
...Syriza’s proposal repudiates the central plank of the Thessaloniki Programme on which the party was elected. The programme’s declared goal is to “write off the greater part of public debt’s nominal value so that it becomes sustainable in the context of a ‘European Debt Conference.’”
...The Financial Times commented that investors were “relieved that the Greek government seemed to be pushing for a restructuring of the debt it owes to the troika of state-level creditors, rather than that of private-sector creditors who already had their loans renegotiated in 2012.”
...On Sunday, Syriza Labour Minister Panos Skourletis said his party’s election promise to restore the minimum wage to its previous pre-austerity rate of €751 would be put on hold and implemented only gradually.
...In another retreat Monday, Varoufakis, referring to an earlier report that the privatisation of the strategic port of Piraeus would be halted, ruled out the “recall of privatisations which are due to be completed,” saying that would be “unwise.”
[source : Financial markets celebrate as Syriza repudiates pledge to write off Greek debt,, WSWS, http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2015/02/04/syri-f04.html, 4th February 2015]
Perhaps this is just real politik. Or maybe it has all been a big fat Greek con. We'll see in a few weeks time when the Greek debt has to be agreed.
Wednesday, February 04, 2015
EMMERSON RECOMMENDED GODDARD
Ben Emmerson, counsel to #CSAinquiry, recommended Lowell Goddard as inquiry chairwoman, Whitehall sources reveal to Exaro.
— ExaroNews (@ExaroNews) February 4, 2015Ben Emmerson is one of the QCs in the Litvinenko Inquiry. The other is Tam, who Tony Gosling said represented MI5 in a case against him. SO we can ask, if May appoints an MI5 QC then what does that say about Emmerson?
Well, this is interesting.
We have listened back to Theresa May’s statement, and she DID say that. Everything dissolved, except Ben Emmerson. #CSAinquiry
— ExaroNews (@ExaroNews) February 4, 2015And as for the location and membership of the panel of the inquiry itself:
Whitehall sources also say that #CSAinquiry may sit at Royal Courts of Justice. This is not looking good for CSA survivors.
— ExaroNews (@ExaroNews) February 4, 2015And on the subject of Litvinenko, ExaroNews have seen something that I pointed out years ago. Lugovoi was in London with his family at the time of Litvinenko's death. He took his son to watch a football match. As ExaroNews point out:
Litvinenko also told officers in his deathbed that Lugovoi introduced him to his eight-year old son - they even shook hands - after he had drunk the tea.
His description of how Lugovoi encouraged his son to greet Litvinenko raises questions about the claim that the former had, just moments earlier, poisoned the latter with a highly radioactive substance.
[source : Alexander Litvinenko's police interviews underime Met case, ExaroNews, http://www.exaronews.com/articles/5471/alexander-litvinenko-s-police-interviews-undermine-met-case, 2nd February 2015]
As far as we know neither Lugovoi or Kovtun are skilled assassins trained in the use of deadly radioactive substances. This would be some first wet job for both of them!
I have been asking, and ask again: what sort of man would risk the life of his own son?
Maybe Lugovoi is as callous as David Cameron and would. But when Lugovoi said that Litvinenko was working for MI6, nobody believed him and MI6 denied it. Yet just a few days ago Marina said he was working for MI6 and was being paid £ 2000 per month by them. They said it was for 'consulting', but when you read some of the garbage that Litvinenko wrote, e.g. Russia was behind all the Islamic terrorism and 9/11, it is clear that Litvinenko was writing anti-Russia propaganda.
So Litvinenko either:
1. had become expendable due his ridiculous propaganda and possibly more useful to MI6 dead so his death could be blamed on Putin:
2. or really was a bona fide traitor, and as a traitor...
WE'LL GET FASCIST BILDERBERG AUSTERITY WHOEVER WE VOTE IN
So in 2007/8 we bailed out the banks. The Tories said they'd sort it out.
Here is the national debt since 1992...ALL 1.7 TRILLION POUNDS OF IT.
Here is that debt as a percentage of GDP.
[Data from ONS]
After years of Tory fascism and war, then years of Labour fascism-lite and more war, followed by more Tory fascism and yet more war, what do we get?
1.7 TRILLION POUNDS OF DEBT and that debt becoming more and more unpayable as it increases as a percentage of our GDP.
So how are we going to pay it back?
Well, it would help if we knew who we owed, but the muggins British public is not allowed to know.
But here is an encouraging, heartwarming article in the FT:
Do those graphs remind you of a rising balloon of unpayable debt?
5th Dimension - Up Up and Away
Here is the national debt since 1992...ALL 1.7 TRILLION POUNDS OF IT.
Here is that debt as a percentage of GDP.
[Data from ONS]
After years of Tory fascism and war, then years of Labour fascism-lite and more war, followed by more Tory fascism and yet more war, what do we get?
1.7 TRILLION POUNDS OF DEBT and that debt becoming more and more unpayable as it increases as a percentage of our GDP.
So how are we going to pay it back?
Well, it would help if we knew who we owed, but the muggins British public is not allowed to know.
But here is an encouraging, heartwarming article in the FT:
All the main UK political parties are likely to raise taxes and borrow more than planned, the Institute for Fiscal Studies said on Wednesday in a detailed analysis of the problems facing the next government.
The new administration will also have to attack some of the foundations of Britain’s welfare state if it wants to avoid even stronger public spending cuts, the IFS said In its annual pre-Budget analysis.
[source : IFS warns over need for higher tax rises, FT, http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/9a83d67c-abcf-11e4-b05a-00144feab7de.html?siteedition=uk#axzz3QmLvnGzY, 4th February 2015]
Do those graphs remind you of a rising balloon of unpayable debt?
5th Dimension - Up Up and Away
Monday, February 02, 2015
JOHN PILGER ATTACKS THE GUARDIAN BUT STILL TRUSTS IT
I have respect for John Pilger. His documentary The War on Democracy is a classic and should be shown in schools across the world.
However, there are times when I suspect (but only slightly) that he might be a bit of a gatekeeper. And in a recent article he shows this by attacking The Guardian but then defending it.
One of the attacks is this over Iraq:
Another is this over Ukraine:
So Pilger is accusing newspapers like The Washington Post and The Guardian of bending over to the establishment and not questioning their pro-war propaganda and publishing it with little or no examination, thus sending nations to war.
But what does Pilger say about Julian Assange and Ed Snowden, who rose to fame through...(drum roll)...The Guardian and The Washington Post?
It was The Washington Post and The Guardian who brought us the war files on Afghanistan and Iraq. Tens if not hundreds of thousands of files of information were dumped onto Wikileaks. But they were dumped anonymously, i.e. they could have been dumped by a genuine whistleblower, or dumped by someone in Langley. I suspect the latter because the vast majority was information against enemies of the establishment while there was very little against the USA or UK.
The same goes for Ed Snowden. The Guardian and The Washington Post published The Snowden Revelations on their front pages for weeks if not months. And those front page stories were reported by the majority of the other NATO media. So by August 2013 everybody knew they were being spied on.
So why would The Guardian and The Washington Post send us to war but also tell us that we were being spied on by our own intelligence agencies?
I would suggest it is because virtually every media outlet in the NATOsphere is owned and/or controlled by NATO.
Here is what Snowden's pal Glenn Greenwald said about a year ago:
So now we all know that we are being spied on. Did the public rise up, march on the streets of London, Taunton, Lincoln, Preston and Sunderland? Er no.
So why would Pilger think the major newspapers would be serving the agenda over war but not over total surveillance, particularly now that the spying agencies have two boogeymen to blame for wanting more spying powers and technology:
1. British Jihadis returning from Syria and Iraq after unwittingly serving British foreign policy in ousting Assad;
2. Ed Snowden for revealing how the state spies on us all.
It is this kind of article from Pilger that just, I don't know, bothers me a bit.
Why would the newspapers send our boys off to die in foreign fields but also tell us that we are being spied upon?
I think that quote from Greenwald goes some way:
However, there are times when I suspect (but only slightly) that he might be a bit of a gatekeeper. And in a recent article he shows this by attacking The Guardian but then defending it.
Guardian played a critical role in conditioning readers to accept a new and dangerous cold war
http://t.co/duODeXMvYu pic.twitter.com/Kts4ZRsOta
— Robin Monotti (@robinmonotti) February 2, 2015One of the attacks is this over Iraq:
In 2003, I filmed an interview in Washington with Charles Lewis, the distinguished American investigative journalist. We discussed the invasion of Iraq a few months earlier. I asked him, "What if the freest media in the world had seriously challenged George Bush and Donald Rumsfeld and investigated their claims, instead of channeling what turned out to be crude propaganda?"
He replied that if we journalists had done our job "there is a very, very good chance we would have not gone to war in Iraq."
That's a shocking statement, and one supported by other famous journalists to whom I put the same question. Dan Rather, formerly of CBS, gave me the same answer. David Rose of the Observer and senior journalists and producers in the BBC, who wished to remain anonymous, gave me the same answer.
Another is this over Ukraine:
The most effective propaganda is found not in the Sun or on Fox News - but beneath a liberal halo. When the New York Times published claims that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction, its fake evidence was believed, because it wasn't Fox News; it was the New York Times.
The same is true of the Washington Post and the Guardian, both of which have played a critical role in conditioning their readers to accept a new and dangerous cold war. All three liberal newspapers have misrepresented events in Ukraine as a malign act by Russia - when, in fact, the fascist led coup in Ukraine was the work of the United States, aided by Germany and Nato.
So Pilger is accusing newspapers like The Washington Post and The Guardian of bending over to the establishment and not questioning their pro-war propaganda and publishing it with little or no examination, thus sending nations to war.
But what does Pilger say about Julian Assange and Ed Snowden, who rose to fame through...(drum roll)...The Guardian and The Washington Post?
None of this is necessary today. I doubt that anyone paid the Washington Post and many other media outlets to accuse Edward Snowden of aiding terrorism. I doubt that anyone pays those who routinely smear Julian Assange - though other rewards can be plentiful.
It's clear to me that the main reason Assange has attracted such venom, spite and jealously is that WikiLeaks tore down the facade of a corrupt political elite held aloft by journalists. In heralding an extraordinary era of disclosure, Assange made enemies by illuminating and shaming the media's gatekeepers, not least on the newspaper that published and appropriated his great scoop. He became not only a target, but a golden goose.
Lucrative book and Hollywood movie deals were struck and media careers launched or kick-started on the back of WikiLeaks and its founder. People have made big money, while WikiLeaks has struggled to survive.
None of this was mentioned in Stockholm on 1 December when the editor of the Guardian, Alan Rusbridger, shared with Edward Snowden the Right Livelihood Award, known as the alternative Nobel Peace Prize. What was shocking about this event was that Assange and WikiLeaks were airbrushed. They didn't exist. They were unpeople. No one spoke up for the man who pioneered digital whistleblowing and handed the Guardian one of the greatest scoops in history. Moreover, it was Assange and his WikiLeaks team who effectively - and brilliantly - rescued Edward Snowden in Hong Kong and sped him to safety. Not a word.
It was The Washington Post and The Guardian who brought us the war files on Afghanistan and Iraq. Tens if not hundreds of thousands of files of information were dumped onto Wikileaks. But they were dumped anonymously, i.e. they could have been dumped by a genuine whistleblower, or dumped by someone in Langley. I suspect the latter because the vast majority was information against enemies of the establishment while there was very little against the USA or UK.
The same goes for Ed Snowden. The Guardian and The Washington Post published The Snowden Revelations on their front pages for weeks if not months. And those front page stories were reported by the majority of the other NATO media. So by August 2013 everybody knew they were being spied on.
So why would The Guardian and The Washington Post send us to war but also tell us that we were being spied on by our own intelligence agencies?
I would suggest it is because virtually every media outlet in the NATOsphere is owned and/or controlled by NATO.
Here is what Snowden's pal Glenn Greenwald said about a year ago:
A human being who lives in a world where he thinks he is always being watched is a human being who makes choices not as a free individual but as someone who is trying to conform to what is expected and demanded of them. And you lose a huge part of your individual freedom when you lose your private realm. Politically that is why tyranny loves surveillance, because it breeds conformity. It means people will only do that which they want other people to know they’re doing — in other words, nothing that is deviant or dissenting or disruptive. It breeds orthodoxy.
[source : “Surveillance breeds conformity”: Salon’s Glenn Greenwald interview, Salon, http://www.salon.com/2014/01/03/the_salon_glenn_greenwald_interview_surveillance_breeds_conformity/, 3rd January 2014]
So now we all know that we are being spied on. Did the public rise up, march on the streets of London, Taunton, Lincoln, Preston and Sunderland? Er no.
So why would Pilger think the major newspapers would be serving the agenda over war but not over total surveillance, particularly now that the spying agencies have two boogeymen to blame for wanting more spying powers and technology:
1. British Jihadis returning from Syria and Iraq after unwittingly serving British foreign policy in ousting Assad;
2. Ed Snowden for revealing how the state spies on us all.
It is this kind of article from Pilger that just, I don't know, bothers me a bit.
Why would the newspapers send our boys off to die in foreign fields but also tell us that we are being spied upon?
I think that quote from Greenwald goes some way:
A human being who lives in a world where he thinks he is always being watched is a human being who makes choices not as a free individual but as someone who is trying to conform to what is expected and demanded of them. And you lose a huge part of your individual freedom when you lose your private realm. Politically that is why tyranny loves surveillance, because it breeds conformity. It means people will only do that which they want other people to know they’re doing — in other words, nothing that is deviant or dissenting or disruptive. It breeds orthodoxy.
SURPRISE! LINDSEY GRAHAM PROPOSES 10000 AMERICAN BOOTS ON THE GROUND IN SYRIA
But does he mean 5000 soldiers, or 10000 soldiers?
Anyway, Graham is proposing that an army consisting of troops from the USA and some Arab nations should invade Syria to destroy Islamic State, but before doing so they must remove Assad.
Surprised? No. Me neither.
This is precisely why Islamic State was created in the first place: problem-reaction-solution, as David Icke describes it.
Create a problem, provoke the reaction you want, then implement the solution you want.
Simples!!
Only in this case what has happened is that:
1. 9/11 was done as an inside job to provoke calls for war to implement Plan A which was a series of wars in North Africa and the Middle East that had been planned years before;
2. but by 2007 that plan A was moribund so the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia agreed a Plan B in which the latter would unleash international cutthroat Jihadis onto Lebanon, Syria and Iran under the banner of The Arab Spring;
3. but by 2014 that Plan B was moribund, the brave and competent Syrian Arab Army chasing the terrorists out of Syria, so Plan C was agreed in which the terrorists would form a barbaric, medieval, degenerate Caliphate which would be described as a threat to the whole world which must be destroyed, but the only way it can be destroyed is by letting the USA invade your nation because if you don't then you are a terrorist and must be ousted.
Get it?
They create monsters to trick us into war and police state surveillance.
Anyway, Graham is proposing that an army consisting of troops from the USA and some Arab nations should invade Syria to destroy Islamic State, but before doing so they must remove Assad.
Surprised? No. Me neither.
This is precisely why Islamic State was created in the first place: problem-reaction-solution, as David Icke describes it.
Create a problem, provoke the reaction you want, then implement the solution you want.
Simples!!
Only in this case what has happened is that:
1. 9/11 was done as an inside job to provoke calls for war to implement Plan A which was a series of wars in North Africa and the Middle East that had been planned years before;
2. but by 2007 that plan A was moribund so the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia agreed a Plan B in which the latter would unleash international cutthroat Jihadis onto Lebanon, Syria and Iran under the banner of The Arab Spring;
3. but by 2014 that Plan B was moribund, the brave and competent Syrian Arab Army chasing the terrorists out of Syria, so Plan C was agreed in which the terrorists would form a barbaric, medieval, degenerate Caliphate which would be described as a threat to the whole world which must be destroyed, but the only way it can be destroyed is by letting the USA invade your nation because if you don't then you are a terrorist and must be ousted.
Get it?
They create monsters to trick us into war and police state surveillance.
Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), who is considering a 2016 presidential bid, said on Sunday it would require 10,000 American "boots on the ground" to stop the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS) in Syria.
Coalition airstrikes in Iraq and Syria won't destroy the group, but do help in some regard, Graham said on CBS's "Face the Nation."
Graham said U.S. forces in Syria should be accompanied by a regional force of Arab nations.
But, he said, "we cannot successfully defeat ISIL on the ground in Syria with the Free Syrian Army and regional coalitions of Arab nations until you deal with Assad because he will kill anybody that comes in there that tries to defeat ISIL."
Graham said Iraq and Syria were the best platforms from which to launch another attack on the U.S. since 9/11. If ISIS is not stopped, he added, "you'll see a Paris on steroids pretty soon."
[source : Graham: 10K US boots on the ground needed to stop ISIS in Syria, The Hill, http://thehill.com/policy/defense/231392-graham-10k-us-boots-on-the-ground-needed-to-stop-isis, 1st February 2015]
Sunday, February 01, 2015
CALCULATIONS
I knocked up an Excel spreadsheet to calculate the angles, locations etc. The problem is a tricky A level Mathematics-type question.
Assuming:
1. steady wind speed of 20 Km/h;
2. steady wind blowing from the east;
3. direct distance between location of photographer and proposed launch site of 7 Km;
4. time between launch and photograph of 2.5 minutes (30s from launch to strike, then another 2 minutes for photographer to take the photos) i.e. very generous time for photographer to get prepared;
5. angle between line of sight to launch site and wind direction was 45 degrees.
then the white plume would be directly over the east end of the village called Chervonyi Zhovten (Google Maps) and thus surely very visible to the inhabitants of that village and surrounding towns and villages.
However, a steady wind 20 Km/h is quite a strong wind given that the gusts were 13 Km/h maximum, i.e. a relatively calm day.
So assuming a steady wind of 12 Km/h speed, and the photo taken at 1 minute after launch (30s from launch to strike, then another 30s for the photographer to take the photos) then the plume would still be hanging over the field containing the proposed launch site and would be visible over the three ropeways in the photos.
If we assume a steady 15 Km/h wind and photo taken 2 minutes after launch then the plume would barely have left the field containing the proposed launch site.
I am not convinced, unless:
1. the wind speed about 50 m above ground level was a steady 20 Km/h at least;
and/or
2. the photographer took much longer than 2 minutes to take the photograph after hearing explosions.
I also think the white plume looks like it is a lot closer to the photographer than the launch site, suggesting a wind direction of SE or ESE, but records all state E or ENE.
Assuming:
1. steady wind speed of 20 Km/h;
2. steady wind blowing from the east;
3. direct distance between location of photographer and proposed launch site of 7 Km;
4. time between launch and photograph of 2.5 minutes (30s from launch to strike, then another 2 minutes for photographer to take the photos) i.e. very generous time for photographer to get prepared;
5. angle between line of sight to launch site and wind direction was 45 degrees.
then the white plume would be directly over the east end of the village called Chervonyi Zhovten (Google Maps) and thus surely very visible to the inhabitants of that village and surrounding towns and villages.
However, a steady wind 20 Km/h is quite a strong wind given that the gusts were 13 Km/h maximum, i.e. a relatively calm day.
So assuming a steady wind of 12 Km/h speed, and the photo taken at 1 minute after launch (30s from launch to strike, then another 30s for the photographer to take the photos) then the plume would still be hanging over the field containing the proposed launch site and would be visible over the three ropeways in the photos.
If we assume a steady 15 Km/h wind and photo taken 2 minutes after launch then the plume would barely have left the field containing the proposed launch site.
I am not convinced, unless:
1. the wind speed about 50 m above ground level was a steady 20 Km/h at least;
and/or
2. the photographer took much longer than 2 minutes to take the photograph after hearing explosions.
I also think the white plume looks like it is a lot closer to the photographer than the launch site, suggesting a wind direction of SE or ESE, but records all state E or ENE.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)