ON GEORGE GALLOWAY AND HIS PERSECUTION

The charity which George Galloway nominated as the recipient of his fees and other financial rewards for appearing on the latest Celebrity Big Brother is rarely receiving a mention. That charity is called Interpal. Interpal stands to gain approximately £150,000 from Galloway's appearance in CBB. During his time in the CBB house Galloway has been ridiculed for wearing a red leotard with cross-dresser Pete Burns, and for pretending to be a cat licking an imaginary saucer of milk held by Rula Lenska. MPs have been queueing up to lambast Galloway for making a fool of himself in such a way, they say. Investigate him! Kick him out of the Commons!

MPs are not supposed to do such things as wear red leotards for charity. Oh no. They are supposed to isolate themselves in the House of Commons bar and unquestioningly believe every word that is uttered from the now-proven lying mouth of this government.

In the run up to, during and after the Iraq War Galloway warned of creating thousands of bin Ladens. Well, what happened on 7th July and 21st July 2005?

Interpal has twice been investigated by The Charity Commission over allegations of links to terrorism, and both times it was cleared. The latest smear of Interpal was made by The Board of Deputies of British Jews. The BDBJ called Interpal a "terrorist organisation". Interpal took the BDBJ to court and has accepted an out of court settlement for an undisclosed sum and a retraction of the allegation by the BDBJ.

This sounds remarkably similar to the allegations made against Galloway, in which The Daily Telegraph claimed to have found documents implicating Galloway as an Iraqi agent. The documents were allegedly found in pristine condition in a burnt out building, and were unsigned. Galloway took the Daily Telegraph to court over them and won. Yesterday The Daily Telegraph lost its appeal against the damages awarded to Galloway.

You could be forgiven for thinking MPs would be over the moon for Galloway raising so much money for charity. Thousands of people dress up in silly costumes every year to run the London Marathon, for example, to raise only a fraction of the money Galloway will have raised for Interpal. What about Red Nose Day? Same thing, people dressing up in silly costumes. But are they ridiculed? No. They are praised and cheered on.

Is there one individual who could raise £150,000 on their own on Red Nose Day or in the London Marathon?

As Galloway said last night, many displaced and impoverished Palestinians will eat tonight because of Galloway. Meanwhile over the illegal partitioning wall Israel continues to receive billions and billions of dollars in aid from the USA.

Perhaps it is this that has embarrased MPs into attacking Galloway.

The BBC Radio 5 Live debate this morning was not on the state of the health service with its projected £1 billion overdraft, not on the latest set of troops being sent to Afghanistan, not on the sham debt-based monetary system we have, but instead asked the question, "Is George Galloway's political career over?"!

Yesterday we were also treated to seeing Galloway meeting a son of Saddam. This was while on a tour, again fund-raising for charity.

Here is a photo of interest.



This is a photo of Donald Rumsfeld meeting Saddam Hussein in 1983 to negotiate and arrange sales of some very nasty WMD-type stuff. Throughout the 1980's Saddam was an ally of the USA receiving financial assistance, and also military assistance in its war with Iran. As soon as that war finished Saddam was then tricked into invading Kuwait in 1990 after April Glaspie had indicated to Saddam that the USA would not get involved if Saddam invaded Kuwait. We then went to war on Iraq to restore Kuwaiti democracy, which was one king, one vote. During the 1990's Iraq was bombed and bombed and bombed. Many, many men, women and children died, amid allegations that Saddam had WMDs, the same WMDs that the USA, and the UK for that matter, had sold him! Were these sales by accident or design? Knowing the way the NWO works it was no accident, just like al-Qaeda is called "blowback". An excuse would be needed to invade Iraq, and the camouflage of enforcing the no-fly zone would seriously weaken resistance to any invasion of land forces.

Galloway sees things like this that other MPs don't seem to see, or do not want to see because of what it implies. But more importantly he gets out of the Commons and tells us.

Perhaps MPs should have a Red Leotard Day in the House of Commons, for charity. They could raise millions! I doubt it would happen. They have too much work to do in building the Police State.