The British Government has been accused of withholding evidence from the inquest into the radioactive Russian traitor Alexander Litvinenko, whose wife Marina believes this is being done to protect trade between Great Britain and Russia.
On September 11th 2001 four passenger planes were allegedly hijacked and flown around the North East sector of American airspace for nearly two hours before flying into the the WTC 1 and 2 and even the flipping Pentagon without any shot being fired. Shortly after this General Wesley Clark was told in two different meetings how the USA would engage in war and regime change in seven nations in five years. The nations named to Clark were Iraq, Lebanon, Libya, Syria, Sudan, Somalia and Iran. Most of these had previously been named in two Zionist warmongering documents, A Clean Break and Rebuilding America's Defenses, the latter explicitly stating that a "new Pearl Harbor" would be required to transform the opinion of the American public to go on such a bloody rampage.
So Iraq was invaded in 2003 based the pretext that Iraq had been involved in 9/11 and had WMD. Neither was true.
There was a small war contrived by Israel on Lebanon in 2006.
But by 2007 this plan revealed to Clark was moribund. So an agreement was reached between Israel, Saudi Arabia and the USA to unleash cutthroat Jihadis onto several of the nations named to Clark. Libya was the first to suffer this plague of cutthroat Jihadi locusts. Since killing Gaddafi, an ally in the war on terror having given the names of suspected al Qaeda to CIA and MI6, these Jihadis have been busy in North Africa and Syria.
And so to Syria.
Last year there was enormous pressure placed on Russia to support an invasion and/or military intervention in Syria. Russia has refused. Russia waited and investigated the massacres that the NATO media screamed had been committed by Assad, and found such allegations false or inconclusive. So any kind of evidence that could put further pressure on Russia to acquiesce in the destruction of Syria and the replacement of Assad would be very useful.
So to recap:
1. a cabal of kiddie-fiddling warmongering megalomaniacs did the inside job 9/11 to get at nations like Iraq, Syria and Iran. Their plan stalled so they have unleashed an uncontrollable plague of cutthroat Jihadi locusts onto a number of nations, one of them currently Syria.
2. Russia has rejected military intervention in Syria, despite enormous pressure following several false flag massacres blamed by NATO media on Assad and his supporters.
So if the British government had evidence that Russia was indeed behind the death of the radioactive Russian traitor Litvinenko would that evidence not be released to put even more pressure on Russia to relent and allow military intervention in Syria?
What we have seen in this controversial death from the British government is lots and lots of finger pointing but very little hard evidence. And when prompted to provide such evidence the British government hides behind Public interest immunity (PII).
For years it was just rumour and idle speculation that Litvinenko was actually working for MI6. It has only recently been confirmed that this was in fact the case. Litvinenko even had his own handler "Martin" and his private mobile number.
So I think the question is, at the moment which is more important: some small trade agreements between Great Britain and Russia, or kicking Assad out of Syria to eventually get Iran?
And remember, they did the inside job 9/11 to get these nations!
I believe the latter. Only yesterday it was announced that the USA has broadened the definition of non-lethal aid to include virtually everything except rifles and heavy artillery, so that now the al Qaeda rebs will receive armour-plated vests and armoured personnel carriers from the USA and the guns, artillery and ammo from Saudi Arabia and Qatar. This shows just how much ousting Assad means to them.
No comments:
Post a Comment