ANOTHER MYSTERIOUS REFERENCE

In The Unseen Hand by Ralph Epperson, Epperson writes

In his book The History of the Great American Fortunes, author Gustavus Myers had identified the major power behind the Second Bank of the United States as being the Rothschild family.1

[source : The Unseen Hand, Ralph Epperson, Chapter 1, The Rothschild Family]

The source for this statement is given as Gary Allen.

1. Quoted in Gary Allen, "The Bankers, Conspiratorial Origins of the Federal Reserve," American Opinion, (March, 1970), p. 1.

The History of the Great American Fortunes is massive. Three volumes. I cannot find a copy of this Allen article online, but The History of the Great American Fortunes is available online and can be quickly scanned for a word.

The three volumes can be accessed by the links provided by the Wikipedia page on Myers at
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gustavus_Myers

You can scan for any word you like; Myers, Astor, Vanderbilt, railroad. The scan produces the exact location of that word in the volume being scanned.

I typed in Rothschild.

THERE WERE NO ENTRIES FOUND FOR ROTHSCHILD! IN ALL THREE VOLUMES!

If there are no entries found for Rothschild then how can Myers say that the Rothschilds were the powers behind the Second Bank of The United States.

Possibilities to explain this are:
1. Epperson has used the wrong reference.
2. Allen has used the wrong reference.
3. Rothschild is mentioned by Myers but for whatever reason the scan does not find it but does find any other word you enter that is in the volume.
or more sinister,
4. Allen has made this reference up!

This on its own may not mean so much, but if we consider the following:
1. Michael Kirsch and Anton Chaitkin show comprehensively that Andrew Jackson was a dupe of the British and was used, wittingly or unwittingly, to destroy The Second Bank of The United States.
2. Eustace Mullins stated in Secrets of The Federal Reserve that Nicholas Biddle was an agent of the Rothschilds but provides no reference.
3. Eustace Mullins twists statements of one his sources, Henry Clews, and omits information that Clews says which would oppose what Mullins tries to suggest.

Mullins also wrote a book called The Biological Jew which develops the idea that Jews are satanist parasites who kidnap young children and sacrifice them in the local synagogue.

It is entirely possible that Epperson or Allen have provided the wrong reference, which would be a case of sloppy research, and in which case can they be trusted on every other reference they provide?

But on the other hand the statement that the Rothschilds were the power behind the Second Bank of The United States could be yet another statement in the operation, I suspect, to portray Jackson as a hero for destroying the bank that under Biddle was quickly developing the USA into a rival of the British Empire so that such a bank is never considered again.

There is something very, very wrong with all this, don't you think?