UKRAINE IN PERSPECTIVE

On 9/11 several passenger planes were allegedly hijacked by Islamic terrorists run by a Muslim fanatic hiding out in a cave in Afghanistan. Those planes were flown into the WTC in New York, and one even managed to fly into one of the most protected buildings on the planet : the Pentagon. The USA blamed Osama bin Laden (without much convincing evidence) and went to war. First stop Afghanistan, where NATO ousted the Taliban who had eradicated the opium crops. And surprise, within a few years opium harvests were at record levels.

Next stop Iraq.

In 1997 the Project for a New American Century was formed, and one of their first demands of then President Bill Clinton was that he overthrow Saddam Hussein. The founders of PNAC were serious, dedicated Zionists. When George W Bush was elected as POTUS he surrounded himself with these Zionists. On the day of 9/11 they all demanded war. But against who?

NATO Chief Wesley Clark in Winning Modern Wars stated that shortly after 9/11 he was told of a plan for war and regime change in 7 countries in 5 years even though none of these 7 nations had anything to do with 9/11. He repeated this claim and more in a speech to the Commonwealth Club of California in October 2007. The 7 countries named to Clark were Iraq, Iran, Lebanon, Syria, Libya, Sudan and Somalia.

By 2006 the Anglo-American-Zionist-NATO empire realised that the strategy implemented in Iraq was not working, so they decided on a new strategy of using Jihadis. This was exposed in The Redirection published by Seymour Hersh in The New Yorker Magazine in 2007 in which Hersh set out the plan to use the worst cutthroat Jihadis to overthrow governments.

The former foreign minister of France, Roland Dumas, stated that in 2009 he was asked by British to create a plan to smuggle Jihadis into Syria.

This redirection of using cutthroat Jihadis was first used in Libya. Gaddafi began to fight these NATO cutthroat Jihadis. NATO then cried foul and cited the responsibility to protect (R2P) their 'freedom fighters' who were in fact their cutthroat Jihadis being used to oust Gaddafi. Note that Libya had nothing to do with 9/11 and was also on the hit list of 7 countries named to Wesley Clark.

So with the acquiesence of both Russia and China (who both abstained on the vote for war on Libya at the UNSC) NATO began to defend their Jihadis and bombed Libyan military fighting the Jihadis. The Jihadis eventually murdered Gaddafi.

After murdering Gaddafi the NATO cutthroat Jihadis were shipped into Syria.

General Flynn revealed that Islamic State was a creation of NATO. The murderer of Lee Rigby, Michael Adebalajo, was allowed to preach Jihad against Assad on the streets of London to encourage young muslims to join IS against Assad. And again NATO cited R2P to defend the IS Jihadis in Syria.

But Putin intervened in Syria to defend the Russian port of Tartus, and Assad has survived.

So that's where the war plan revealed to Wesley Clark currently is: Putin stopped the plan in Syria in 2015 and the plan is stalled with Iran. Trump tried to start war with Iran by assassinating General Soleimani. No doubt the Anglo-American-Zionist-NATO empire is fomenting the current destabilisation in Iran.

One wonders what would have happened if Russia and/or China had voted against war on Libya in 2011.

During WW2 the Nazis executed Operation Barbarossa to invade the Soviet Union. This was a horrific invasion in which approximately 28 million living in the Soviet Union died at the hands of the Nazis or fighting the Nazis.

But what happened to the Nazi infrastructure at the end of WW2? Nazis and their loot were smuggled out of Europe to South America. Nazis were taken to the USA for scientific research. Nazis were given intelligence jobs to run propaganda operations against the Soviet Union.

That's how NATO thanked the Soviet Union for defeating the Nazis.

In 1989 the Berlin Wall came down, and NATO began to creep towards the western borders of Russia, in a slow motion replay of Barbarossa.

At the Security Conference in Munich in 2007 Putin drew a red line at Ukraine. The following year NATO began courting Ukraine and Georgia. There was a short war between Russia and Georgia on the eve of the Olympic Games.

In late 2013/early 2014 Ukraine decided to align with Russia. NATO began organising protests in Kiev against this alignment with Russia, in particular in Maidan Square. NATO then hired snipers from Georgia to shoot up Maidan Square to kill dozens of protestors. This massacre was blamed on the pro-Russian government who were chased out by NATO Nazis. These Nazis then began a civil war on the pro-Russia east of Ukraine. During the war MH17 was shot down. The fighting ended in Minsk I and then the Minsk II agreements. But the war continued.

Zelensky promised Ukraine that he would end the war and implement Minsk II.

But Zelensky has reneged on that promise and continued the war on the pro-Russian east of Ukraine.

So not just Putin but the Russian Duma and large sections of the Russian people supported the invasion of east Ukraine in a R2P to defend the pro-Russia people in east Ukraine from ethnic cleansing by Zelensky and NATO Nazis.

So it's apparently OK for the Anglo-American-Zionist-NATO empire to execute 9/11 and the subsequent wars, then create gangs of cutthroat Jihadis and cite R2P to save them to achieve their geopolitical goals.

But not OK for Russia to cite R2P to defend ethnic Russians from ethnic cleansing by NATO Nazis in a Barbarossa-esque operation.

But there are a few problems:

1. the invasion of Ukraine appears to agree with The Great Reset by cutting off essential products such as gas and grain;

2. nuclear war is now a real prospect.