As I understand it, having listened to the ruling, and read subsequent analyses:
- The ICJ did not explicitly accuse Israel of genocide, but did say that some actions could be interpreted as genocide;
- The ICJ did accuse some Israeli officials of inciting genocide;
- The ICJ has given Israel the green light to continue their (engineered) war on The Gaza Strip in their 'hunt' for Hamas, but Israel must be nicer, gentler, a bit less genocidal, ie kill thoughtfully only 7 children when Israel would have previousy wantonly killed 10 children and bathed in their blood;
- The ICJ has asked or demanded that more aid be allowed in;
- The ICJ has asked/demanded that Israel retain evidence of possible genocide, and report to the ICJ in 1 month what they have done to swerve crimes of genocide;
- The ICJ has asked/demanded that Hamas release their hostages, but has not asked/demanded that Israel do the same.
In 1 month it will be way too late. The job will be done. Gaza will be overrun by disease, starvation, dehydration. Many destitiue families will want to leave voluntarily, and Israel will claim that they left voluntarily.
So far nobody is to be investigated or prosecuted for war crimes.
The member of the ICJ who delivered the verdicts is the President of the ICJ, Joan Donoghue, who is from the good ol' USA, who since WW2 have orchestrated many violent revolutions, including in Ukraine in 2014.
Initial joy at the verdicts has been replaced by realism: this is a victory for Israel.
Yeah, they got told off, but they should have been crucified.
"America is a place that can be easily moved" - Benjamin Netanyahu
As long as Israel controls the USA we don't stand a chance.
No comments:
Post a Comment