BRILLIANT ATTACK ON BILDERBERG USING CIA

Two search terms to enter into the NSA/CIA search engine called Google are

Bilderberg films

Bilderberg wide open

This is to drive the Google machine into helping to expose the main political conspiracy, Bilderberg. Following Fidel Castro commenting on Estulin's book The Secrets of the Bilderberg Club Google Trends saw two search terms including Bilderberg in the top ten.

Cut and paste the above terms into your Google box and hammer it to take new readers and viewers to the article below which contains the two films Endgame and The Obama Deception by Alex Jones.

=====================

From http://www.prisonplanet.com/two-films-that-blew-bilderberg-wide-open.html

Two Films That Blew Bilderberg Wide Open

Fidel Castro’s spotlight on the Bilderberg clique is part of a global awakening to the new world order

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Friday, August 20, 2010

The Bilderberg Group is receiving fresh and timely attention after Cuban president Fidel Castro published an article warning of the fact that the globalist clique, “has become a kind of global government, controlling not only international politics and economics, but even culture,” prompting the term “Bilderberg” to shoot to the top of the Google Trends rankings.

This is part of a global awakening to the new world order in which millions of people around the globe are finally discovering where the true power lies and why the world is being driven headlong towards serfdom and dictatorship,

Castro quoted almost verbatim from Daniel Estulin’s 2006 book The Secrets of the Bilderberg Club in his regular newspaper column, sparking a fresh round of international media coverage some four months after the Bilderbergers last met in Spain, something the publicity-shunning gaggle of globalists were completely unprepared for.

Having A Supply Of Healthy Foods That Last Just Makes Sense

Castro drew attention to Bilderberg’s plan to “install a world government that knows no borders and is not accountable to anyone but its own self,” reported the Associated Press. The Cuban leader went into further detail, quoting Estulin on his research about how the “Frankfurt School of socialist academics worked with members of the Rockefeller family in the 1950s to pave the way for rock music to “control the masses” by diverting attention from civil rights and social injustice.”

Castro’s decision to put the spotlight on Bilderberg, knowing that the international media would take the bait, produced a familiar outcome, with the corporate press repeating Bilderberg’s talking point that it represents nothing more than a casual get-together and has no power to set policy.

(ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW)

In reality, as we reported in June, Bilderberg attendees are mandated to implement decisions that are formulated during the annual conference of power brokers. As Willy Claes, former Secretary General of NATO revealed during a Belgian radio interview, members are required by Bilderberg to set the agreed upon policy within the environments they have influence over. This is why when a consensus is reached on certain issues at Bilderberg, such as the Euro single currency, the invasion of Iraq, and which politicians will run for major offices, it routinely then plays out in the real world.

Bilderberg is now an open conspiracy, with the agenda for world government an undeniable reality and no longer the fodder for sophomoric jibes about conspiracy theories.

Two key Bilderberg films that contributed to this unraveling of Bilderberg’s cloak of secrecy were Alex Jones’ Endgame and The Obama Deception. In Endgame, Alex Jones bullhorns the 2006 Bilderberg meeting in Ottawa Canada, garnering front page coverage in major newspapers as for the first time Bilderberg’s efforts to preserve their low profile agenda were blown wide open.

Watch Endgame in full below.

In The Obama Deception, at the same time that the majority of Americans were under the spell of thinking that Obama was a populist man of the people who would enact real change, Alex Jones exposed how he was personally chosen over Hillary Clinton at the 2008 Bilderberg meeting by Bilderberg luminaries and how Obama was in actual fact a compliant servant for the Bilderberg globalists who he answers to, people like Zbigniew Brzezinski.

Watch The Obama Deception in full below.

The films revealed how traitorous government officials go to Bilderberg to get their marching orders, which is especially relevant this year because during the last Bilderberg meeting in Spain, the majority of attendees expressed their support for an attack on Iran, which is seemingly imminent.

Collectively, The Obama Deception and Endgame have received millions of views as Bilderberg’s open conspiracy is laid bare. But these Bilderberg films need to reach millions more Americans before we can communicate the understanding that the system is rigged and that both parties are managed by elitists who control both sides of the political spectrum.

Just because you know that doesn’t necessarily mean that everyone else does, and so it’s up to you to get these Bilderberg films out to the people and help us reach critical mass on exposing the agenda for world government. This has already been advanced through decades of hard work from people like Jim Tucker, and more recently Daniel Estulin – now it’s your turn to contribute to the awakening.

A ruling elite can only continue to operate successfully in the shadows – only once their treachery sees the light of day will we begin to see true change, and it’s already happening with Bilderberg kingpin Zbigniew Brzezinski admitting recently that a “global political awakening” was derailing the agenda for a new world order.

Now is the perfect opportunity to use these Bilderberg films to get the message to people about what Bilderberg truly represents, and how they are shaping the globe in their own image from behind the scenes while the majority of Americans still continue to obsess about political partisanship and meaningless party labels.

AN OPEN LETTER TO CRAIG MURRAY AND MICHAEL MANSFIELD

Dear Sirs

Over last weekend a group called Bilderberg met near Barcelona in Sitges, Spain. Bilderberg have been accused of, among other things, vetting our political leaders before election (most notoriously in the cases of Tony Blair and Bill Clinton), planning wars and engineering the prices of oil. My own research indicates they are seriously implicated in the cause of the current financial crisis, the administration of the subsequent bailouts (which banks survived and grew stronger and which banks died and were gobbled up by the survivors), and the current crisis with the Euro, because Goldman Sachs, along with JP Morgan Chase, Deutsche Bank and Banco Santander (all have grown significantly in strength during the crisis while their competitors have gone under), is one of their banks.

Anyway, due to a source within Bilderberg we know that over the weekend Bilderberg reached a consensus to wage war on Iran. For years critics of Bilderberg have long suspected that Bilderberg does control the major global events, but did not have definitive proof of that or proof of how they implement their plans. However, a Bilderberg member, wittingly or unwittingly, has finally divulged the information we Bilderberg critics have long been waiting for. That member of Bilderberg is Willy Claes, former longtime Minister in the Belgian government and former Secretary-General of NATO (ALL SecGens of NATO are Bilderberg). In a recent radio interview Claes admitted that Bilderberg does indeed set the agenda for the next twelve months before Bilderberg next meets, but he also described how the Bilderberg organisers implement their conspiracy. Each attendee at the conference gives a 10 minute speech, and at the end of the conference each member is given a list of action points that they should consider implementing as part of their professional role or in their particular sphere of influence, based on the speeches given by the attendees.

I have to tell you that this is dynamite information.

I have personally believed that war on Iran was always on the cards due to the documents entitled A Clean Break, written in 1996 for Benjamin Netanyahu, and Rebuilding America's Defenses, written by The Project for a New American Century (PNAC). I also believe, after a decade of research, that the current series of wars laid out in those documents are the final stages of a centuries long plan to implement a despotic world government after three world wars with the third due to a global war between Zionism and Islam. Both of the aforementioned documents were written by the same group of Zionists who on 9/11 occupied a number of very senior positions of the Bush Administration; Donald Rumsfeld as Secretary of Defense, Dick Cheney as Vice-President, Paul Wolfowitz as Deputy Secretary of Defense, Richard Perle, John Bolton. The list is long. PNAC wrote in Rebuilding America's Defenses that they wanted "a new Pearl Harbor" in order to persuade the American public that the USA should create a massive military machine to go on the rampage and engage in multiple simultaneous wars across the globe. What happened? 9/11. What happened after that? They ignored bin Laden and instead went after Saddam Hussein, who had nothing to do with 9/11 and did not have WMD, but they have also invaded and occupied Afghanistan (and there is a lot of evidence that the US military let bin Laden and co escape from Tora Bora, and that the US military are now actively engaged in the opium trade, which several British and American aristocracy have been profiting from for centuries; the Taliban had virtually eradicated the trade).

All the above mentioned personnel are members of Bilderberg. Perle was there last weekend.

A Clean Break stated that targets of Israeli aggression should be
1. Iraq
2. Lebanon
3. Syria
4. Iran via Hezbollah

Rebuilding America's Defenses stated that the targets of US aggression should be
1. Iraq
2. Iran
and suggested that Iran was more of a threat to the USA than Iraq.

Since the highly suspicious 9/11, military conflict with these nations has been executed or proposed by the Israeli-US-UK alliance in one form or another.

A state of peace currently exists between the UK, the USA, Israel and Iran, but there have been several provocations, notably the Lebanon War 2006, and the capture of British Marines in disputed waters off Iran in 2007. With this vote by Bilderberg they are about to use their influence in government, media, academia, industry and commerce to push for war with Iran.

My question is; can the members of the Bilderberg Steering Commitee, and indeed those who voted for war on Iran over the weekend and do use their professional role and influence to engineer a war with Iran, be prosecuted for crimes against peace as per the Nuremberg Principle VI?

A THEORY

In the 1990's two documents were written by basically the same circle of nutters calling for multiple simultaneous wars of aggression and expansion. Those documents were A Clean Break, and Rebuilding America's Defenses.

In order to put the plans laid out in those two documents into action "a new Pearl Harbor" was required.

9/11 somehow happened, despite numerous detailed warnings.

Immediately blame was laid at the feet of Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein.

The bin Laden allegation has allowed the USA and its allies to set up camp next to the Caspian Basin, full of fossil fuels.

The Saddam allegation allowed the USA and its allies to invade Iraq, also full of fossil fuels.

These two moves make it obvious that 9/11 was used to grab fossil fuels, vast quantities of fossil fuels.

The AGW theory was being used to ram through mass genocide policies in underdeveloped nations...but failed.

When the massive fossil fuel reserves in the Caspian Basin and Iraq (and possibly Iran) reach the market via Bilderberg Oil Corporations those companies are going to make a fortune.

But burning such massive amounts of fossil fuel is going to create a lot of CO2.

So if a method could be found to make even more profit from fossil fuels then trading in CO2 emissions could do it.

So the theory of AGW was pushed, with apocalyptic forecasts of the seas boiling and men frying in the heat. The 'solution' was mass depopulation.

By causing mass depopulation, as proposed by OPT etc, in the underdeveloped nations via taxation, economic murder etc, those nations would be driven/forced to sell their carbon certificates to the CO2 producing developed nations to create some sort of income just to survive.

And the traders in those certificates would be Bilderberg banks and their gofers.

By taxing the underdeveloped nations on their own national suicide hundreds of billions of dollars would be placed in the hands of one of their own, Robert Zoellick at The World Bank, where it would then be used for purposes other than saving the underdeveloped nations, such as financing world government operations.

Thus, if Copenhagen would have been agreed we would have seen,
1. massive depopulation in the underdeveloped world
2. massive trading in carbon derivatives
3. massive increase in fossil fuel consumption (though that was on the cards anyway)
4. massive profits for Bilderbergers, from sale of fossil fuel products and carbon-related financial products.
5. massive financing of the world government apparatus by asking underdeveloped nations to commit suicide and pay a global tax to The World Bank while they do it!

This is classic New World Order thinking.

Discuss.

LITTLE OLD GRANNY IS GOING TO SUFFER

As I have repeatedly warned, Little Old Granny is going to pay for the banks gambling policies encouraged by our inglorious murdering Bilderberg Prime Minister.

Alistair Darling is set announce that pensions and health, the two largest sectors of public spending, are going to have to be slashed.

And the people who knew this was coming, planned for it all along behind closed Bilderberg doors, have already implemented the Liverpool Care Pathway to provide some of the savings. They have also sent their man who got the LCP implemented here to the USA to get a similar Nazi euthansia program implemented there to pay for their bank bailouts.

As soon as Little Old Granny sneezes she will be put on that Liverpool Care Pathway to heaven to save on her pension and treatment. And the same goes for Little Old Granddad.

Meanwhile the two Bilderbergers who helped screw up the British economy, Sir Tom McKillop and Sir Peter Sutherland, both on the board of RBS as the crisis evolved, are living a good life.

But how do we know that Bilderberg planned all this?

Because nothing as big as the current financial crisis gets passed Bilderberg without their consent or encouragement. And the fact that their banks (J P Morgan Chase, Deutchse Bank,, Goldman Sachs, Banco Santander) have reaped massive profits and become more powerful after the event indicates that this crisis was planned to empower themselves, and to implement their favourite Nazi policy of euthanasia to pay for the bailout.

For they are Nazi at their core.

They financed Nazis.

The meetings were organised by Nazis.

And now the Bilderberg Nazis are rolling out their Nazi euthansia policies of killing the weakest and frailest in society, your little old granny, to pay for the bailout that they engineered to enrich and empower themselves.

And our inglorious murdering Bilderberg Prime Minister Gordon Brown, one of their own from 1991, is going along with it.

=======================================

From http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/financetopics/budget/6738681/Pre-Budget-report-UK-faces-decades-of-debt-warns-Treasury.html


Pre-Budget report: UK ‘faces decades of debt’, warns Treasury
Britain faces decades of rising public sector debt, increasing taxes and, potentially, falling living standards unless it tackles the growing costs of its pensions and health bill, the Treasury will warn this week.


By Edmund Conway
Published: 9:20PM GMT 05 Dec 2009

In a paper to be printed alongside the pre-Budget report (PBR), the Treasury will warn that the costs of paying for state pensions and the National Health Service are set to rocket between now and 2059 unless action is taken to reduce the bill.

The paper on long-term fiscal challenges, which will accompany the shorter-term forecasts in the PBR, is intended to focus politicians from both parties on the risks faced by Britain unless they contemplate radical actions such as increasing the retirement age or cutting back on free healthcare provision.

WHO ARE THE REAL FASCISTS?

Fascism was officially born in Italy by Mussolini. Mussolini was given $100 million by J P Morgan, i.e. Rothschild, in 1925 and we recently learned that Mussolini was a British agent during WW1 propagandizing for war. Fascism opposes freedom of expression.

Today, still, the following can be found on the Unite Against Fascism website;
"We call on the Home Secretary and the police to ban the EDL action."

The UAF link the EDL with the BNP.

On the BNP website you can read the following in their manifesto for the economy;
"The banksters cannot be let off the hook for their role in the current financial crisis. The BNP demands that the banksters responsible for the catastrophe which has crippled the international banking system be held personally legally liable for their actions in terms of corporate governance laws. They should have to pay a personal price for the mess they have created, and not be rewarded with huge bonuses which have come from taxpayer-funded bailouts."

This is something most British taxpayers can agree with, particularly myself who has provided a detailed legal argument as to how the banksters can be prosecuted, and is possibly partially why Nick Griffin was stitched up on BBC QT, for no other British political party is so keen to see the banksters prosecuted.

I can find no similar statement on the UAF website.

The Pecora Commission found that J P Morgan was working against the interests of the USA and banking operations in the USA were changed (but for whatever reason the Federal Reserve still remained). Lord Turner this year stated that in his opinion it was the derivatives market that had caused the current financial crisis. And who was and still is the largest player in derivatives? J P Morgan Chase.

In other words, J P Morgan financed fascism with his loan to Mussolini, J P Morgan was found by the Pecora Commission to have been involved in the crash of 1929, and Lord Turner indirectly blamed J P Morgan Chase with its derivatives policy for the current crisis.

The main beneficiaries of the current crisis, as Bilderberger Martin Wolf so kindly pointed out to us in the FT, are Bilderberg banks, primarily J P Morgan Chase, Banco Santander, Goldman Sachs and Deutsche Bank, whose most senior managers have all regularly attended Bilderberg in the last decade, usually as members of the steering committee. For those who are still unaware of Bilderberg it was started by a card carrying Nazi and financed by collaborators of the Nazis and works towards first establishing a fascist european government and then secondly a fascist world government which will be crowned after yet another engineered world war.

But now, let's get this straight.

The BNP want the banksters (the same banksters who bankrolled fascism in the first place via J P Morgan!) sent down while the UAF want to ban protests?!

Is this Alice in Wonderland? or 1984?

Say NO! to racism. I fully support that.

But let's get everything into perspective.

The word fascism should be used very carefully.

Black and white should unite to fight the real fascists; those Bilderbergers who really believe in true bona fide Nazi policies of global corporatism and murder, policies in effect today, and who financed those policies and continue to finance and implement those same policies today.

The race card is being played to divert anger away from the real culprits, who have been identified by the BNP; the banksters.

Thanks to the banksters, little old granny, be she black, white, or any colour, is going to get it. She is being killed off right here right now to pay for the bailout via the Liverpool Care Pathway. The policies being introduced now, such as for assisted suicide, are only the beginning. You will soon be bombarded with mercy killing propaganda.

MURDER AND THE FRAUD ACT 2006 SECTION 4 FRAUD BY ABUSE OF POSITION

The banks fcukt us gud n proper.

They thought, that by discussing it behind Bilderberg doors, that nobody would find out.

They thought, that by discussing it behind Bilderberg doors, that everybody would think it would simply be accepted as greed and incompetence.

They thought, that by discussing it behind Bilderberg doors, that they wouldn't have to take legal advice (because if they did then this would show intent).

Unfortunately The Fraud Act 2006 Section 4 Fraud by Abuse of Position IS applicable.

We get our money from the banks, not the Bank of England (only in exceptional circumstances, like now).

The banks have a responsibility to create money for a growing and stable economy for us all.

Instead they deliberately and greedily inflated a housing bubble to create the money required to gamble on exotic and potentially very lucrative derivatives.

They literally threw money at us. Every morning you would receive a letter from this or that credit issuing organisation offering loadsa interest-free credit for this, that and the other. Simply sign the form and return it asap and you too could have that dream house/holiday/car etc etc

But they could only lend to a certain number of creditworthy people.

So they started to lend to jobless no-hopers to feed the derivatives monster...and then expressed surprise when those loans and mortgages issued to such people were not repaid.

So, once this practice was introduced, inevitably it was doomed to fail.

And we know that some expected it to fail, and wanted it to fail, knowing that they would be given tens if not hundreds of billions in bailouts from their Bilderberg buddies to buy up their competitors and increase their market share.

But a predictable effect of such a sneaky operation would mean that the bailouts would inevitably be dropped on us, the muggins taxpayer, and that it is we who would have to pay for the bailout.

And how do we know?

Because BEFORE it all went wrong certain people had introduced a measure to kill little old granny at the first signs that she was not well. Killing ill old people saves money because
1. murdered little old granny doesn't need a pension, the largest sector of UK public spending
2. murdered little old granny doesn't need healthcare, the second largest sector of UK public spending

This is the cold-blooded greedy logic of the most evil.

But it has been identified.

And is not appreciated one fucking bit!

HOW DO THEY DO IT?

It is now the turn of that ol' Zionist Paul "WMD" Wolfowitz to write in the FT.

Wolfowitz, lest we forget, was the architect of the disastrous invasion of Iraq. He knew where the WMD were. He knew the Iraqis would welcome the invading forces with open arms.

Wrong, and wrong.

Well, Wolfowitz is wrong again in this latest load of billox.

His error is that he does not mention Israel's WMD.

He does mention Israel, but referring only to Israel's desire for attacking Iran and that we must do it instead, continuing the policy of regime change as we saw in June.

But how do they do it? I mean, the FT publishes comments by the likes of Wolfowitz, Geithner and Ackermann, and they all attend Bilderberg frequently, and in some cases almost every year.

Perhaps it has something to do with the fact that Martin Wolf, Associate Editor of the FT, is also a regular attendee at Bilderberg.

PS I wonder what the response would be if in the title Tehran was replaced by Tel Aviv?

===================================
From http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/d75d1d86-ab91-11de-9be4-00144feabdc0.html

Confront Tehran now in pursuit of a nuclear-free world

By Paul Wolfowitz

Published: September 27 2009 23:16 | Last updated: September 27 2009 23:16

Barack Obama has displayed extraordinary flexibility in his approach to Iran’s nuclear programme. He has supported Iran’s “right to a peaceful nuclear energy programme”, declared his willingness to meet unconditionally and extended his own deadlines for Iran to begin serious negotiations. He has maintained that position despite Iran’s bellicose rhetoric and despite congressional pressure for sanctions.

Although it has produced no positive response from Tehran, the Obama administration’s flexibility has clearly demonstrated that the obstacle to resolving the Iranian nuclear issue is not a US refusal to negotiate. Even under the Bush administration, the US participated regularly in multilateral talks with Iran. But if there was any ambiguity about the previous administration’s willingness to negotiate, there has been none whatsoever about the Obama administration.

Last week’s revelation of a covert uranium enrichment facility makes it clear that Iran’s rulers are pursuing nuclear weapons. Common sense suggested this long ago. Iran’s proven reserves of natural gas are the world’s second largest (after Russia) and four times those of the US. With two-thirds of those reserves still undeveloped, expensive nuclear power plants are a waste of resources. Even for nuclear energy, it would be cheaper to purchase reactor fuel rather than enrich uranium. Most tellingly, why would Iran be developing long-range ballistic missiles if its nuclear intentions were peaceful? And why build a covert centrifuge plant that is too small to be of commercial use and at a military base? As a senior official of the Obama administration said last week: “Our information is that the Iranians began this facility with the intent that it be secret, and therefore giving them an option of producing weapons-grade uranium without the international community knowing about it.”

In 1994, proponents of the Framework Agreement with North Korea argued that Pyongyang would not cheat because the risks of being caught were too great. As it turned out, even the chances of being caught were not great and the consequences proved to be negligible. When the Clinton administration found signs of a secret facility in 1998, it was unable to prove it, perhaps because the North Koreans had cleaned up the site (as the Iranians are probably doing now). Definitive proof of North Korea’s centrifuge programme did not come to light until 2002, but when charged with this violation, Pyongyang rapidly broke out of the 1994 restrictions, reprocessed the previously “safeguarded” plutonium and tested a nuclear device. Faced with the prospect that North Korea could always do something worse, the US kept making concessions in order to resume negotiations.

Iran has said that it simply aspires to follow the Japanese model of peaceful nuclear development, but that is not as reassuring as it sounds. In 2002, Ichiro Ozawa, now general-secretary of Japan’s new ruling party, said: “We have plenty of plutonium in our nuclear power plants, [enough to] produce 3,000 to 4,000 nuclear warheads.” Given Japan’s decidedly peaceful foreign policy, those stockpiles do not occasion great fears. No one expects Japan to kick out International Atomic Energy Agency inspectors and abrogate safeguards as North Korea did. The same cannot be said of Iran, which is steadily accumulating its own break-out capability by producing low-enriched uranium. Thus, any agreement that allows Iran continued enrichment of uranium is likely to repeat the unsatisfactory experience with North Korea, in which violations are followed by new concessions to bring the violator back to the negotiating table.

Normally even the toughest sanctions would be unlikely to persuade Tehran to abandon its pursuit of nuclear weapons. The Iranian economy is far less vulnerable to sanctions than North Korea and Iran’s rulers have shown that they care little if their people suffer. However, circumstances in Iran are no longer normal. The push for reform in Iran that began with the protests against June’s election fraud offers an opportunity to bring the Iranian people into the debate about the true costs of their rulers’ nuclear ambitions.

To do so, the world must talk less about Iran’s right to peaceful nuclear energy and more about how the regime is wasting the people’s resources. It means doing what we can to support the forces of reform in Iran, both symbolically and practically. Unfortunately, it also means bringing home to the Iranian people that they will pay an increasingly high price for their rulers’ nuclear ambitions. That means the toughest possible sanctions, and soon. Time is running out. The suggestion that Iran can avoid sanctions without abandoning uranium enrichment, simply by opening its illegal facilities to inspection, will be interpreted by Tehran as a sign of weakness. Even this approach may not be enough to persuade Israel not to act on its own, but at least it offers some prospect of success. And it is more than Israel’s security that is at risk. Iran’s Arab neighbours are also deeply worried that nuclear weapons would embolden Iran’s support for terrorism, subversion and even conventional military aggression. Americans need to consider that nuclear weapons might embolden Tehran to provide sanctuary to al-Qaeda or other terrorists. Or, more catastrophically, even to provide them covertly with nuclear weapons.

The pursuit of a nuclear-free world involves substantial risks. Those risks could only be justified if they eliminate the threat of terrorists acquiring nuclear weapons and the threat of a nuclear war between regional powers. Iran is a crucial test of whether the path to a nuclear-free world is a realistic one or simply a dangerous pipe dream.

The writer is a Visiting Scholar at the American Enterprise Institute

Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2009. You may share using our article tools. Please don't cut articles from FT.com and redistribute by email or post to the web.