GOODBYE MANMADE WHATEVER

I've just read the post by George Robot Monbiot in The Guardian on the communications hacked from the UEA CRU, and he is in baaaad form.
[source : Global warming rigged? Here's the email I'd need to see, The Guardian 24/11/2009,
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cif-green/2009/nov/23/global-warming-leaked-email-climate-scientists ]

Robot Monbiot does not address the contents of the communications, instead calling for some heads to roll (which is something), and then tries to make a mockery of the scandalous information by writing a fake email by a fictitious Professor Ernst Kattweizel, in which Kattweizel, a member of a fictitious secret society called the Knights Carbonic, lays out the history and strategy of 'the conspiracy' to implement a world government.

Yes, all very, very funny, but very, very foolish.

1. at the Club of Rome they first thought of using the climate as a weapon against humanity to assign any change in climate as man's fault and that because the climate is a global phenomenon then a global solution, i.e. world government, would be needed
2. they then pushed the man made global cooling theory, but that didn't work out so well
3. so they then pushed the man made global warming theory, which because of the enormous amount of research grants offered, caught on
4. they then blamed any extreme weather event on MMGW
5. they then used the demon CO2 to propose, yes you've guessed it, more tax and more surveillance, including black boxes in cars to track every driven millimetre, and personal carbon quotas thus allowing yet more incredible surveillance by the state
6. but despite the terrible horrible threat of CO2, the most polluting activity of mankind, air travel, is to be expanded, and climate change activists are harassed, spied on and falsely arrested.
7. and now lots of emails indicating that MMGW data has been sexed-up and/or falsified have been hacked from a prime research centre into MMGW.

Now, what would Robot Monbiot be saying if such emails indicating a cover up of the 2003 invasion of Iraq had been hacked from Number 10?

Would he be mocking the 'world government conspiracy'?

The facts are plain are simple:
Any theory that supports the imposition of a world government has been, is being and will be financed by the same people who engineered and financed WW1 and WW2. The global institutions of today, being given more and more power by the day, are a result of WW1 and WW2. And now those institutions have been established and accepted they now parrot the mantra every second of every day

global solutions to global problems
global solutions to global problems
global solutions to global problems
global solutions to global problems
global solutions to global problems
global solutions to global problems
global solutions to global problems
global solutions to global problems
global solutions to global problems
global solutions to global problems
global solutions to global problems
global solutions to global problems

And one such global problem is alleged to be man made global warming.

Those hacked emails prove the theory of man made global warming is highly suspect...just like many of us who believe in the world government conspiracy have believed, because we are not robots.

THERE IS AN ANTARCTIC POLE TOO

The Meteorological Office, and yes that's the same Meteorological Office who predicted a BBQ summer and a warm winter last year, are reporting on their website that ice melt at the arctic can partially be attributed to man-made climate change. The report examines the panic that was engineered by the dramatic decrease in arctic sea ice in 2007, and now attributes that dramatic increase to extreme weather.
[source : The decline in Arctic summer sea ice, The Meteorological Office 15/10/2009]

As with the failed predictions we have been given over the last year, were such extreme weather conditions predicted? If not, why not? I suspect that if they had been predicted correctly that we would have heard about it, before and after.

But I would like to remind the Met Office that we also have the Antarctic pole too.

And sea ice at the Antarctic has increased.

Without the 2007 drama then over the last few decades sea ice levels at the poles would have been pretty much balanced, with a net effect of ice transferred from the Arctic to the Antarctic (though obviously the ice would not have travelled physically from one pole to the other).

Check out the graphs at the bottom of the page at
http://nsidc.org/seaice/characteristics/difference.html
(and remember the freak of 2007)

So I say, like I would to the EU about us not killing little old granny off fast enough to pay for the bank bailout; don't panic!

They said we were entering a man-made ice age. A few years later they said we were causing global warming.

They said last winter would be warm.

They said last summer would be a barbecue summer.

And now they say that an event in the Arctic in 2007 which led to a dramatic increase in sea ice which was initially attributed to man was in fact due to freak weather (which was not predicted).

We can predict weather and thus climate to a significant accuracy just days ahead.

Not weeks.

Not months.

Not years.

Not decades.

Despite all the computing power and the rinky dinky mathematical models and numerical methods we have (in the public domain anyway, the military may have more accurate methods), we can only predict the weather to any degree of accuracy just one or two days ahead.

And if you don't believe me check out the Met Office predictions today for next Thursday, and not just for your area but for the whole of the UK, and you'll see what I mean.

I really wish the Met Office could be more accurate (and I would be very interested in applying the CFD methods I am researching on the computers I am using to predicting weather) but unfortunately it is not. Occassionally they get it right 3 or 4 days ahead but that is only becuse there is a large slow moving high pressure system bringing clear conditions.