No Bilderbergers in The Washington Post today.
All scuttled back under the fridges to join the rest of the cockroaches.
Wednesday, August 13, 2008
Tuesday, August 12, 2008
WHAT IS THE USA UP TO?
I have just seen the US Ambassador to NATO Kurt Volker speak on Channel 4 News. He was forced to admit that Georgia should not have invaded and attacked South Ossetia, but was very keen to accuse Russia of overreacting.
Overreacting?
Is this the same USA who invaded Iraq and Afghanistan 6 years ago over a pack of lies and a false flag attack?
Earlier today a meeting between NATO and Russia was cancelled because the USA failed to turn up, but the US delegation did find time to meet with the Georgian Ambassador to NATO behind closed doors to discuss...how to get themselves out of a big, big hole.
So why would Volker
1. have a clandestine meeting with Georgia when it should have been meeting with Russia?
2. appear on Channel 4 News to bash Russia when by now he should have met with Russia to discuss the conflict?
There is something very ugly about this.
================================================
From http://www.russiatoday.com/news/news/28902
U.S. blocks Russia-NATO Council meeting
NATO has hailed Russia's decision to halt its military operation in South Ossetia as good news. But Jaap de Hoop Scheffer says Georgia's actions in South Ossetia will not affect its chances of joining the military alliance. However, the U.S. has blocked an emergency NATO-Russia Council meeting on the situation in South Ossetia.
Russia's Foreign Ministry says by doing it Washington is justifying what Moscow calls ‘Georgia's criminal action’.
Andrey Nesterenko, Russian Foreign Ministry spokesman said: “The main problem, I believe, is lack of will to understand the real situation in South Ossetia which is the result of the aggressive actions from Tbilisi, no will to listen to the other side.”
Russia’s permanent representative to NATO Dmitry Rogozin said he doesn’t understand why NATO is refusing to hold direct talks in the Russia-NATO Council framework.
"We're told that it's a technical problem. The U.S. delegation failed to show up this morning at NATO headquarters which resulted in the Russia-NATO Council not going ahead. ‘NATO permanent representatives needed more time to figure out what happened’ – this is very odd because NATO permanent representatives had enough time to discuss this problem here today during the Council session.
They had enough time to invite the Georgian ambassador and listen to his propaganda. But they weren't ready to meet with their Russian partner, to hear the questions I have for our American colleagues about their share of the responsibility for the preparation of the bloodbath in South Ossetia. This is unacceptable".
Rogozin said he insists that the partners ‘stop avoiding serious, adult political conversation’ on this topic.
"What happened in South Ossetia was a tragedy. And NATO, which is responsible for international security, should not hide behind the backs of other organisations," he added.
Meanwhile, Jaap de Hoop Scheffer said that the Russia-NATO Council meeting will be held very soon, but it should be thoroughly prepared.
Overreacting?
Is this the same USA who invaded Iraq and Afghanistan 6 years ago over a pack of lies and a false flag attack?
Earlier today a meeting between NATO and Russia was cancelled because the USA failed to turn up, but the US delegation did find time to meet with the Georgian Ambassador to NATO behind closed doors to discuss...how to get themselves out of a big, big hole.
So why would Volker
1. have a clandestine meeting with Georgia when it should have been meeting with Russia?
2. appear on Channel 4 News to bash Russia when by now he should have met with Russia to discuss the conflict?
There is something very ugly about this.
================================================
From http://www.russiatoday.com/news/news/28902
U.S. blocks Russia-NATO Council meeting
NATO has hailed Russia's decision to halt its military operation in South Ossetia as good news. But Jaap de Hoop Scheffer says Georgia's actions in South Ossetia will not affect its chances of joining the military alliance. However, the U.S. has blocked an emergency NATO-Russia Council meeting on the situation in South Ossetia.
Russia's Foreign Ministry says by doing it Washington is justifying what Moscow calls ‘Georgia's criminal action’.
Andrey Nesterenko, Russian Foreign Ministry spokesman said: “The main problem, I believe, is lack of will to understand the real situation in South Ossetia which is the result of the aggressive actions from Tbilisi, no will to listen to the other side.”
Russia’s permanent representative to NATO Dmitry Rogozin said he doesn’t understand why NATO is refusing to hold direct talks in the Russia-NATO Council framework.
"We're told that it's a technical problem. The U.S. delegation failed to show up this morning at NATO headquarters which resulted in the Russia-NATO Council not going ahead. ‘NATO permanent representatives needed more time to figure out what happened’ – this is very odd because NATO permanent representatives had enough time to discuss this problem here today during the Council session.
They had enough time to invite the Georgian ambassador and listen to his propaganda. But they weren't ready to meet with their Russian partner, to hear the questions I have for our American colleagues about their share of the responsibility for the preparation of the bloodbath in South Ossetia. This is unacceptable".
Rogozin said he insists that the partners ‘stop avoiding serious, adult political conversation’ on this topic.
"What happened in South Ossetia was a tragedy. And NATO, which is responsible for international security, should not hide behind the backs of other organisations," he added.
Meanwhile, Jaap de Hoop Scheffer said that the Russia-NATO Council meeting will be held very soon, but it should be thoroughly prepared.
RUSSIA'S ENVOY TO NATO SPEAKS OF "DARK-SKINNED GEORGIANS"
From http://georgiandaily.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=5770&Itemid=65
US military advisers were in Georgia ahead of conflict: Russia
AFP
August 12, 2008 Tuesday 3:15 PM GMT
US military instructors were in Georgia at the beginning of the conflict with Russia, Moscow's ambassador to NATO claimed Tuesday, adding that some fighters killed could prove to be Americans.
"At least 127 American military instructors were in Georgia at the beginning of the conflict. There were joint training sessions that happened right before the start of the conflict," Russian ambassador Dmitry Rogozin told reporters in Brussels.
He added that it wasn't clear if any of the Americans were still in the country when the fighting broke out.
However he spoke of "dark-skinned Georgians found dead."
"If we need to do DNA tests, we will do it," said Rogozin.
He was talking after the 26 NATO nations decided not to call an extraordinary meeting of the NATO-Russia council Tuesday, a fact which Rogozin blamed on the US.
The NATO nations, in the Allliance's North Atlantic Council, condemned Russia's "excessive, disproportionate use of force," NATO Secretary General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer said.
US military advisers were in Georgia ahead of conflict: Russia
AFP
August 12, 2008 Tuesday 3:15 PM GMT
US military instructors were in Georgia at the beginning of the conflict with Russia, Moscow's ambassador to NATO claimed Tuesday, adding that some fighters killed could prove to be Americans.
"At least 127 American military instructors were in Georgia at the beginning of the conflict. There were joint training sessions that happened right before the start of the conflict," Russian ambassador Dmitry Rogozin told reporters in Brussels.
He added that it wasn't clear if any of the Americans were still in the country when the fighting broke out.
However he spoke of "dark-skinned Georgians found dead."
"If we need to do DNA tests, we will do it," said Rogozin.
He was talking after the 26 NATO nations decided not to call an extraordinary meeting of the NATO-Russia council Tuesday, a fact which Rogozin blamed on the US.
The NATO nations, in the Allliance's North Atlantic Council, condemned Russia's "excessive, disproportionate use of force," NATO Secretary General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer said.
WHO WOULD SANCTION SUCH CRIMES?
Russia Today is reporting on a Georgian attack on the village of Khetagurovo. Men, women and children either burned alive in a church, or run over and crushed by a tank.
The cruelty and barbarism of this attack was undoubtedly designed to provoke a military response from Russia.
=================================
From http://www.russiatoday.com/news/news/28872
Civilians perish as Georgian troops torch church
The Regnum news agency is reporting that Georgian troops burned down a 10th century Orthodox church while terrified civilians perished inside. The agency quotes eyewitness accounts of the atrocity after all-out fighting in Khetagurovo, a small village near the republic’s capital Tskhinvali.
Almost all of those fighting to defend the village were killed, but the report says the fate of others, mostly women and the elderly, turned out to be even more horrible.
Eyewitnesses report that Georgian tanks literally ran people down and that soldiers took almost all the women to another location. Their fate is still unknown.
Meanwhile, those who didn’t manage to escape found their shelter in a 10th century Orthodox church. Civilians hoped that Georgians of the same faith wouldn’t dare storm the building, one of the oldest of its kind in the country.
But Regnum reports that the Georgian troops set the church on fire and left those inside to perish.
It is the latest in a series of reports of the Georgian military attacking and killing civilians.
========================================
But who could and would sanction such crimes?
Look at the picture below. You have seen it many times before, but this time ignore the inverted, irregular and incomplete pentagram, and focus on the building it is pointing into...THEBLOODWHITE HOUSE!
The cruelty and barbarism of this attack was undoubtedly designed to provoke a military response from Russia.
=================================
From http://www.russiatoday.com/news/news/28872
Civilians perish as Georgian troops torch church
The Regnum news agency is reporting that Georgian troops burned down a 10th century Orthodox church while terrified civilians perished inside. The agency quotes eyewitness accounts of the atrocity after all-out fighting in Khetagurovo, a small village near the republic’s capital Tskhinvali.
Almost all of those fighting to defend the village were killed, but the report says the fate of others, mostly women and the elderly, turned out to be even more horrible.
Eyewitnesses report that Georgian tanks literally ran people down and that soldiers took almost all the women to another location. Their fate is still unknown.
Meanwhile, those who didn’t manage to escape found their shelter in a 10th century Orthodox church. Civilians hoped that Georgians of the same faith wouldn’t dare storm the building, one of the oldest of its kind in the country.
But Regnum reports that the Georgian troops set the church on fire and left those inside to perish.
It is the latest in a series of reports of the Georgian military attacking and killing civilians.
========================================
But who could and would sanction such crimes?
Look at the picture below. You have seen it many times before, but this time ignore the inverted, irregular and incomplete pentagram, and focus on the building it is pointing into...THE
RUSSIA HAS JUST ANNOUNCED ITS MILITARY OPERATION IS OVER
Saakashvili, you've got a lot of explaining to do.
But if you've done it once, then to save your skin it's easier second time around.
==========================
From http://www.russiatoday.com/news/news/28870
Medvedev orders end to military operation
Russian President Dmitry Medvedev has ordered an end to the military operation in Georgia. He said the objective - “to compel Georgia to peace” - has been achieved. Medvedev also ordered the Russian military to “eliminate the aggressor” in the event of Georgian forces resuming hostilities.
Medvedev said the security of the South Ossetian population and of Russian peacekeepers has been restored. He added that the aggressor has been punished and suffered considerable losses.
The Russian President said he would award the military with state medals for the successful operation.
But if you've done it once, then to save your skin it's easier second time around.
==========================
From http://www.russiatoday.com/news/news/28870
Medvedev orders end to military operation
Russian President Dmitry Medvedev has ordered an end to the military operation in Georgia. He said the objective - “to compel Georgia to peace” - has been achieved. Medvedev also ordered the Russian military to “eliminate the aggressor” in the event of Georgian forces resuming hostilities.
Medvedev said the security of the South Ossetian population and of Russian peacekeepers has been restored. He added that the aggressor has been punished and suffered considerable losses.
The Russian President said he would award the military with state medals for the successful operation.
GORBACHEV'S COMMENT IS MUCH MORE MEASURED
Mikhail Gorbachev, who guided the Soviet Union to collapse and was awarded prizes and money by the west in return, has also managed to get a comment published in The Washington Post, and it is much more measured, entitled A Path to Peace in the Caucasus.
Gorbachev calls Georgia's initial cold-blooded attack on South Ossetia as "beyond comprehension".
The following quote shows Gorbachev is much more accurate in his analysis and aware of the true events, characteristics not shown in the comments by Bilderbergers.
Gorbachev calls Georgia's initial cold-blooded attack on South Ossetia as "beyond comprehension".
The following quote shows Gorbachev is much more accurate in his analysis and aware of the true events, characteristics not shown in the comments by Bilderbergers.
"The Georgian military attacked the South Ossetian capital of Tskhinvali with multiple rocket launchers designed to devastate large areas. Russia had to respond. To accuse it of aggression against "small, defenseless Georgia" is not just hypocritical but shows a lack of humanity.
Mounting a military assault against innocents was a reckless decision whose tragic consequences, for thousands of people of different nationalities, are now clear. The Georgian leadership could do this only with the perceived support and encouragement of a much more powerful force. Georgian armed forces were trained by hundreds of U.S. instructors, and its sophisticated military equipment was bought in a number of countries. This, coupled with the promise of NATO membership, emboldened Georgian leaders into thinking that they could get away with a "blitzkrieg" in South Ossetia."
A STRANGE RANT BY BILDERBERGER GEORGE F WILL
Continuing the Bilderberg control of comments published in The Washington Post, todays contribution comes from George Will.
Whereas in yesterday's contribution Robert Kagan's comment, though actually a load of bollocks, had some coherency and aim, Will's comment shows a lack of clarity and direction, and is more a verbal assault on Barak Obama than on Russia (Will's article is entitled Russia's Power Play).
And whereas Kagan at least mentioned that the current war was due to an event (but did not correctly identify the instigator), unsurprisingly Will does not address the 2000 thousand dead South Ossetians that Georgia murdered in cold blood, a massacre that provoked the current Russian response.
Will's strange rant is so pathetic I'm not even going to quote from it or link to it.
Whereas in yesterday's contribution Robert Kagan's comment, though actually a load of bollocks, had some coherency and aim, Will's comment shows a lack of clarity and direction, and is more a verbal assault on Barak Obama than on Russia (Will's article is entitled Russia's Power Play).
And whereas Kagan at least mentioned that the current war was due to an event (but did not correctly identify the instigator), unsurprisingly Will does not address the 2000 thousand dead South Ossetians that Georgia murdered in cold blood, a massacre that provoked the current Russian response.
Will's strange rant is so pathetic I'm not even going to quote from it or link to it.
Monday, August 11, 2008
BILDERBERG STARTS TO OPENLY DIRECT GEORGIA
Bilderberger Bernard Kouchner first went to Georgia to draw up a ceasefire proposal, and is now on his way to Russia.
Bilderberg Supremo Carl Bildt is now in Georgia to advise Saakashvili during the currrent crisis.
I expect more Bilderbergers will be drawn into the situation in one way or another.
Bilderberg Supremo Carl Bildt is now in Georgia to advise Saakashvili during the currrent crisis.
I expect more Bilderbergers will be drawn into the situation in one way or another.
SOUTH OSSETIA : THE SMOKING GUN?
On 6th August RIA Novosti in an article entitled “S.Ossetia says Georgia plans military intervention this month” reported that the de facto President of South Ossetia, Eduard Kokoity, gave the British Ambassador to Georgia, Denis Keefe, indisputable proof that Georgia was planning a full scale invasion of South Ossetia before September.
For further details see http://en.rian.ru/world/20080806/115847533.html
What I would like to know, and I intend finding out, is
1. what did Keefe do with this information?
2. if it was passed to the Foreign and Commonwealth Office in London, who received that information and what did they do with it?
3. in particular, if Lord Malloch-Brown received that information, what did he do with it, and what was his reaction, considering he financed Saakashvili into power?
4. if this information was passed to American and NATO intelligence, who received the information and what did they do with it?
The real question is, who had foreknowledge?
It is interesting that this report was published on the 6th forecasting an attack before September, when the attack actually took place just a day later. Is it possible that the time of the attack was brought forward by the report, leading to the failure of the attack? Probably not. The diversion of the Olympic Games has allowed NATO media to blur the true origin of the war and issue vague and inaccurate reports on the progress of the war, while we were mesmerised by rich First World countries compete in three-day eventing.
I shall also quote a paragraph from the above article which demonstrates the manipulation that Georgia is conducting.
“Georgia has dismissed widespread fears that war will break out in the region, and says South Ossetia and Russia, which tacitly supports the province, are both trying to create a false impression of escalating violence.”
For further details see http://en.rian.ru/world/20080806/115847533.html
What I would like to know, and I intend finding out, is
1. what did Keefe do with this information?
2. if it was passed to the Foreign and Commonwealth Office in London, who received that information and what did they do with it?
3. in particular, if Lord Malloch-Brown received that information, what did he do with it, and what was his reaction, considering he financed Saakashvili into power?
4. if this information was passed to American and NATO intelligence, who received the information and what did they do with it?
The real question is, who had foreknowledge?
It is interesting that this report was published on the 6th forecasting an attack before September, when the attack actually took place just a day later. Is it possible that the time of the attack was brought forward by the report, leading to the failure of the attack? Probably not. The diversion of the Olympic Games has allowed NATO media to blur the true origin of the war and issue vague and inaccurate reports on the progress of the war, while we were mesmerised by rich First World countries compete in three-day eventing.
I shall also quote a paragraph from the above article which demonstrates the manipulation that Georgia is conducting.
“Georgia has dismissed widespread fears that war will break out in the region, and says South Ossetia and Russia, which tacitly supports the province, are both trying to create a false impression of escalating violence.”
I COULD HARDLY BELIEVE MY EYES
Robert Kagan has today demonstrated the general lack of concern for life of the Neocons with an article in, yes you’ve guessed it, The Washington Post.
Kagan is directly connected to the Neocon Wehrmacht that invaded Iraq, killing approximately 1 million Iraqi men, women and children in the name of US hegemony. He works for the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, writes for the WP and Weekly Standard, and co-founded The Project for the New American Century.
Kagan begins his latest article, entitled “Putin Makes His Move”,
“The details of who did what to precipitate Russia's war against Georgia are not very important.”
If this conflict does reach a peaceful conclusion we here in the NATO countries will be shocked to discover that approximately 2000 South Ossetian civilians were killed by the Georgian military on Friday 8th August. A few eyewitness accounts are slowly filtering through the NATO media firewall.
That’s 2000 "not very important" lives, according to Kagan.
Kagan then, of course, goes on to blame Putin for provoking Georgia, for over-reacting to the installation of missiles in Poland, and for over-reacting to the independence of Kosovo.
At the time, some of us saw through the lies that took us into war in Iraq; 9/11, WMD, etc.
Those lies have since been proven as lies, so that now the whole world, bar a few greedy and insane warmongers in Washington and London, does not believe a word that comes out of the mouths of the likes of Robert Kagan.
Kagan is directly connected to the Neocon Wehrmacht that invaded Iraq, killing approximately 1 million Iraqi men, women and children in the name of US hegemony. He works for the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, writes for the WP and Weekly Standard, and co-founded The Project for the New American Century.
Kagan begins his latest article, entitled “Putin Makes His Move”,
“The details of who did what to precipitate Russia's war against Georgia are not very important.”
If this conflict does reach a peaceful conclusion we here in the NATO countries will be shocked to discover that approximately 2000 South Ossetian civilians were killed by the Georgian military on Friday 8th August. A few eyewitness accounts are slowly filtering through the NATO media firewall.
That’s 2000 "not very important" lives, according to Kagan.
Kagan then, of course, goes on to blame Putin for provoking Georgia, for over-reacting to the installation of missiles in Poland, and for over-reacting to the independence of Kosovo.
At the time, some of us saw through the lies that took us into war in Iraq; 9/11, WMD, etc.
Those lies have since been proven as lies, so that now the whole world, bar a few greedy and insane warmongers in Washington and London, does not believe a word that comes out of the mouths of the likes of Robert Kagan.
Sunday, August 10, 2008
SAAKASHVILI'S RIVER OF BLOOD RUNS ALL THE WAY TO WHITEHALL
Serious questions need to be asked of Lord Malloch Brown.
And I'm gonna ask 'em.
=================================
From http://www.larouchepac.com/news/2008/08/10/soros-enemy-nation-state-was-behind-democracy-revolution.html
Soros, Enemy of the Nation-State, was behind 'Democracy' Revolution
Increase Decrease
August 9, 2008 (LPAC)--Following his service to his British masters in the Balkan wars of 1990-91, George Soros convened a series of training missions in Belgrade, Yugoslavia, that were to launch the ``Rose Revolution,'' the ``Orange Revolution,'' and the series of phony democracy insurgencies designed to undermine nation-states and create a ``ring around Russia'' for a future British-inspired confrontation. One of the key operations run by Soros, as indicated in the LPAC short, ``LaRouche Denounces `Obama's Godfather' George Soros,'' was to topple Georgia President Eduard Shevardnadze, and bring in Mikhail Saakashvili, the Colombia University-trained project of Soros' ``Open Society Institute.''
From 1994 to 2004, Soros' various projects and subprojects of the Open Society Institute, including the Central European Project (CEP) and the Open Society Georgia Fund (OSGF), spent at least $40 million to topple Shevardnaze.
Early in 2003, Soros began a full operation to activate the ``democracy'' shock troops for the takeover of Georgia. The Canadian daily, Globe and Mail provided a vivid account in November 2003:
``Dateline Tbilisi--It was back in February that billionaire financier George Soros began laying the brickwork for the toppling of Georgian President Eduard Shevardnadze.
``That month, funds from his Open Society Institute sent a 31-year-old Tbilisi activist named Giga Bokeria to Serbia to meet with members of the Otpor (Resistance) movement and learn how they used street demonstrations to topple dictator Slobodan Milosevic. Then, in the summer, Mr. Soros's foundation paid for a return trip to Georgia by Otpor activists, who ran three-day courses teaching more than 1,000 students how to stage a peaceful revolution.
``Last weekend, the Liberty Institute that Mr. Bokeria helped found was instrumental in organizing the street protests that eventually forced Mr. Shevardnadze to sign his resignation papers. Mr. Bokeria says it was in Belgrade that he learned ... how to make use of public pressure tactics that proved so persuasive on the streets of Tbilisi after this month's tainted parliamentary election.''
Georgia was not the only "colored" revolution whose Jacobin shock troops were trained by Soros. The play has been repeated in Ukraine and other former nations of the Soviet bloc.
When Saakashvili came to power in 2004, it was the duo of billionaire Soros and the then UN Deputy Secretary General Mark Malloch Brown (now Lord Malloch Brown, Secretary General of the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office) who provided multi-million dollar grants to every Saakashvili government official from the top Cabinet posts to the "lowliest police officer," journalist Mark Almond reported on November 14, 2007. In the same article, posted on his own and many other websites, Almond noted that Saakashvili's well-paid (at $1,000 per month, adjusted for the dollar collapse) police forces were the club-wielding enforcers of Saakashvili's moves against the opposition in the 2007 Georgia elections.
- Merger of Soros and the Empah? -
Lord Mark Malloch Brown is not merely a Soros collaborator and New York house guest, who helped enhance Soros' anti-nation- state warchest with United Nations monies--he is George Soros' business partner.
In April 2007, Malloch Brown was appointed vice-chairman of Soros' hedge fund company, the Quantum Fund, from whence Soros' billions come. The Financial Times reported that ``Sir Mark [now Lord Malloch Brown] will also serve as vice-chairman of the billionaire philanthropist's Open Society Institute, which promotes democracy and human rights, particularly in eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union.''
The FT added in a May 1, 2007 article that, ``In a letter to shareholders in his Quantum hedge funds, Mr Soros said Sir Mark would provide advice on a variety of issues to him and his two sons, who now run the company on a day-to-day basis. With his extensive international contacts, Malloch Brown will help create opportunities for [Soros Fund Management] and the fund around the world....''
Now, Lord Malloch Brown is the Secretary General of the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office. Has he formally left the Quantum Fund and Open Society Institute?
And I'm gonna ask 'em.
=================================
From http://www.larouchepac.com/news/2008/08/10/soros-enemy-nation-state-was-behind-democracy-revolution.html
Soros, Enemy of the Nation-State, was behind 'Democracy' Revolution
Increase Decrease
August 9, 2008 (LPAC)--Following his service to his British masters in the Balkan wars of 1990-91, George Soros convened a series of training missions in Belgrade, Yugoslavia, that were to launch the ``Rose Revolution,'' the ``Orange Revolution,'' and the series of phony democracy insurgencies designed to undermine nation-states and create a ``ring around Russia'' for a future British-inspired confrontation. One of the key operations run by Soros, as indicated in the LPAC short, ``LaRouche Denounces `Obama's Godfather' George Soros,'' was to topple Georgia President Eduard Shevardnadze, and bring in Mikhail Saakashvili, the Colombia University-trained project of Soros' ``Open Society Institute.''
From 1994 to 2004, Soros' various projects and subprojects of the Open Society Institute, including the Central European Project (CEP) and the Open Society Georgia Fund (OSGF), spent at least $40 million to topple Shevardnaze.
Early in 2003, Soros began a full operation to activate the ``democracy'' shock troops for the takeover of Georgia. The Canadian daily, Globe and Mail provided a vivid account in November 2003:
``Dateline Tbilisi--It was back in February that billionaire financier George Soros began laying the brickwork for the toppling of Georgian President Eduard Shevardnadze.
``That month, funds from his Open Society Institute sent a 31-year-old Tbilisi activist named Giga Bokeria to Serbia to meet with members of the Otpor (Resistance) movement and learn how they used street demonstrations to topple dictator Slobodan Milosevic. Then, in the summer, Mr. Soros's foundation paid for a return trip to Georgia by Otpor activists, who ran three-day courses teaching more than 1,000 students how to stage a peaceful revolution.
``Last weekend, the Liberty Institute that Mr. Bokeria helped found was instrumental in organizing the street protests that eventually forced Mr. Shevardnadze to sign his resignation papers. Mr. Bokeria says it was in Belgrade that he learned ... how to make use of public pressure tactics that proved so persuasive on the streets of Tbilisi after this month's tainted parliamentary election.''
Georgia was not the only "colored" revolution whose Jacobin shock troops were trained by Soros. The play has been repeated in Ukraine and other former nations of the Soviet bloc.
When Saakashvili came to power in 2004, it was the duo of billionaire Soros and the then UN Deputy Secretary General Mark Malloch Brown (now Lord Malloch Brown, Secretary General of the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office) who provided multi-million dollar grants to every Saakashvili government official from the top Cabinet posts to the "lowliest police officer," journalist Mark Almond reported on November 14, 2007. In the same article, posted on his own and many other websites, Almond noted that Saakashvili's well-paid (at $1,000 per month, adjusted for the dollar collapse) police forces were the club-wielding enforcers of Saakashvili's moves against the opposition in the 2007 Georgia elections.
- Merger of Soros and the Empah? -
Lord Mark Malloch Brown is not merely a Soros collaborator and New York house guest, who helped enhance Soros' anti-nation- state warchest with United Nations monies--he is George Soros' business partner.
In April 2007, Malloch Brown was appointed vice-chairman of Soros' hedge fund company, the Quantum Fund, from whence Soros' billions come. The Financial Times reported that ``Sir Mark [now Lord Malloch Brown] will also serve as vice-chairman of the billionaire philanthropist's Open Society Institute, which promotes democracy and human rights, particularly in eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union.''
The FT added in a May 1, 2007 article that, ``In a letter to shareholders in his Quantum hedge funds, Mr Soros said Sir Mark would provide advice on a variety of issues to him and his two sons, who now run the company on a day-to-day basis. With his extensive international contacts, Malloch Brown will help create opportunities for [Soros Fund Management] and the fund around the world....''
Now, Lord Malloch Brown is the Secretary General of the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office. Has he formally left the Quantum Fund and Open Society Institute?
SHELLED CITY IS LIVING HELL
From http://www.russiatoday.ru/news/news/28757
News
Send to friend | Print version
Shelled city is living hell
News
Send to friend | Print version
Shelled city is living hell
Victims... bodies of the dead in the city's hospital
August 10, 2008, 12:39
Shelled city is living hell
Thousands of South Ossetians are trapped in the ruins of a city almost destroyed by Georgian missiles. The remaining residents of Tskhinvali are huddled in cellars beneath bombed-out buildings. They are struggling to survive - without water, food or electricity.
The death toll in Georgia’s breakaway republic has reached at least 2,000, according to Russian and South Ossetian sources. Georgian officials deny the figure is that high.
Twelve Russian peacekeepers have also been killed in the fighting with up to 150 others wounded.
A Russian army general was injured when his unit came under fire. There is no information on his condition yet.
In two days of intense fighting, South Ossetia claims a Georgian bomber was shot down and 12 Georgian tanks destroyed in and around Tskhinvali.
The capital is said to be almost completely ruined and without water and electricity.
If you are about to watch the video be warned that some people may find the images disturbing.
The chief of Russia's ground forces says Georgian shelling has destroyed all the hospitals in the South Ossetian captial, Tskhinvali.
It's also reported that more than ten border villages have been burnt to the ground.
The Russian President, Dimitry Medvedev, said Georgia is denying the whole of South Ossetia the right to life by its actions. He said that: "Russian peacekeepers and military units are carrying out an operation to enforce Georgia to a peace deal. They are also responsible for defending of the civillian population".
Russia's Prime Minister Vladimir Putin says the government is planning to allocate around $US 400 million for the reconstruction of South Ossetia.
“The actions of the Georgian leadership in South Ossetia are crime against their own people. A deliberate blow was delivered to the integrity of Georgia and that means a massive damage to its identity. It is hard to imagine after all that happened and all that is still happening they will be able to convince South Ossetia to belong to Georgia,” said Vladimir Putin.
The Russian Ambassador to Georgia, Vyacheslav Kovalenko, says 12 Russian peacekeepers have been killed and 70 wounded during the Georgian attacks.
People take shelter in bunkers
More than 30,000 refugees have arrived in Russia's southern regions as people try to flee the conflict zone. Meanwhile, thousands of people still remain in the demolished city of Tskhinvali. Amid continuing shelling, people are sheltering in bunkers, but are said to be running out of food, and there is no water or electricity.
Russia's Emergency's Ministry has delivered the first consignment of medication to the South Ossetian capital. Humanitarian aid and power generators are also expected to be delivered soon.
Russian military officials say the 76th Airborne Brigade of the Russian Army has arrived in the conflict region. One section of the brigade has already flown to the South Ossetian capital, Tskhinvali. Other troops will move to the region by ground transport, military sources said.
The main goal of the reinforcements, military officials insist, is to restore peace and protect Russian citizens.
No western cameras in South Ossetia
The conflict over Georgia’s breakaway republic is as much about information as it is about weapons. South Ossetia's press service claims Western media outlets can't be trusted because they haven't been operating in the region ”since the conflict began”. (WATCH THE VIDEO)
“Only the Russian media and one Ukrainian channel have been filming in the breakaway republic. No western camera crews have been working in the conflict zone,” Suslan Bekoev, South Ossetian committee for information and press, said.
Tbilisi remains silent - Russia
Russia's Foreign Ministry says it has not received any proposals from Georgia to stop hostilities. The statement comes after reports that Georgia's President offered Moscow a plan to end the violence.
Russia has insisted a deal can only be reached if Georgia withdraws its troops.
Moscow has repeatedly stressed that it sent additional forces to aid the peacekeepers in the conflict zone, as a response to Georgia's aggression.
Meanwhile, Tbilisi has introduced martial law, and accused Russia of launching a war against it.
I COULD HARDLY BELIEVE MY EARS
I have just heard a brief interview on BBC Radio 5 Live in which the show host Gethin Jones asked a correspondent in Georgia (I didn't catch his name) about the current situation in South Ossetia. Jones asked the correspondent how did the current situation arise, and in his reply the correspondent did not mention the near two thousand civilians who Georgia murdered on Friday, but he did mention the columns of Russian tanks pouring into South Ossetia, which Georgians see as Georgian territory, which really angers the Georgians.
It is widely accepted that Georgia did murder many civilians on Friday. So what is the BBC upto?
Updated every minute, eh?
It is widely accepted that Georgia did murder many civilians on Friday. So what is the BBC upto?
Updated every minute, eh?
THE NUKES OF AUGUST (AGAIN)
I recently posted The Nukes of August in which I anticipated some sort of military conflict in August. I expected a sneak attack by Israel and/or USA on Iran. However, on my website I mention Georgia as a potential flashpoint for provoking Russia into war.
At the moment there does not seem to be the rush to engage Russia militarily by the USA, and the campaign against Russia appears to be restricted to propaganda at the moment, portraying Russia as the evil aggressor. I therefore ask Dmitri Medvedev to start winding down the military conflict before Cheney gets involved and before a terrible accidental hit on a Georgian civilian area destroys any moral advantage Russia has.
If Georgia has left South Ossetia, as the BBC reports it says it has, then ceasefire but continue reinforcing if desired.
We know Cheney is behind this and is no doubt waiting in the shadows to involve the USA when the time is right. We also need to see Tskhinvali and see and hear the survivors of Friday's barbaric attack by Georgia.
As for Saakashvili? He has got some explaining to do.
At the moment there does not seem to be the rush to engage Russia militarily by the USA, and the campaign against Russia appears to be restricted to propaganda at the moment, portraying Russia as the evil aggressor. I therefore ask Dmitri Medvedev to start winding down the military conflict before Cheney gets involved and before a terrible accidental hit on a Georgian civilian area destroys any moral advantage Russia has.
If Georgia has left South Ossetia, as the BBC reports it says it has, then ceasefire but continue reinforcing if desired.
We know Cheney is behind this and is no doubt waiting in the shadows to involve the USA when the time is right. We also need to see Tskhinvali and see and hear the survivors of Friday's barbaric attack by Georgia.
As for Saakashvili? He has got some explaining to do.
BILDERBERGER TRENIN MAKES INTERESTING COMMENT ON OSSETIA
The Washington Post has interestingly published an interesting comment by Dmitri Trenin who attended Bilderberg this year.
Trenin lays out the bare facts, as he sees them.
1. Georgia laid a trap for Russia (therefore the aggressor is Georgia).
2. Russia fell into the trap by sending in troops and tanks and bombing Georgia.
3. Georgia now wants to widen the conflict by calling upon the USA, NATO etc, comparing the conflict to Russia invading Afghanistan etc.
But Trenin then warns the USA, NATO etc of the Guns of August.
What Trenin fails to address is whether Georgia would have set this trap with or without the consent of the USA, NATO, etc. I seriously doubt Saakashvili would have laid such a trap without the consent of Cheney etc, for if the plan failed, as it has, Saakashvili will need all his guile to not swing from the nearest lamppost.
NB in the following comment Trenin states
"This spectacular Act I of the unfolding drama received only muted reaction in the international media."
When you read the papers today, and from yesterday for that matter, note how the massive death toll is reported. Only a handful of media report who actually killed how many. For example, you will read in many papers that 2000 have died in fighting between Georgia and Russia. Your mind will automatically aportion blame 50/50, so that by reporting the death toll this way Russia is equally to blame.
But look at the facts.
It was Georgia who bombed and invaded South Ossetia killing nearly two thousand.
Russia has responded by bombing Georgian military sites, which unfortunately were close to civilian residential areas and accidentally hit. The way the media has generally (a) remained silent on what actually happened on Friday and who killed nearly two thousand civilians, and (b) focusing on Russian aggression (comparable to the bias we see in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict) indicates to me that this was a carefully planned operation from within a rogue USA/NATO circle that controls the media.
I get the feeling that Trenin does not realise who he consorting with at Bilderberg, and is concerned that those he knows through Bilderberg may fall into a WW1-type situation provoked by a madman in Georgia. What Trenin fails to even contemplate is that those who run Bilderberg may well have set the trap themselves.
===================================
From http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/postglobal/needtoknow/2008/08/georgias_risky_move.html
Georgia's Risky Move
By Dmitri Trenin
For months, Russia's tactic was to prove to the west that Georgia was too irresponsible to be considered for admission to NATO. Georgia, for its part, sought to impress on the western publics and governments that Russia, in both Abkhazia and South Ossetia, was an aggressor and occupier. All parties to the conflicts in the two breakaway regions tried to provoke the other side into "showing its true colors".
Acting under time pressure, Georgia has dramatically upped the ante by mounting a large-scale military operation to recover the separatist enclave in South Ossetia. As expected, its now well-trained and well-equipped forces overran the Ossetian formations and took over their capital town, causing a massive loss of life. This spectacular Act I of the unfolding drama received only muted reaction in the international media.
Not so the following Act. President Saakashvili has succeeded in causing Russia to move in with heavy forces. Immediately, the nature of the conflict has been transformed. It is no longer about an obscure ethnic group tucked in somewhere in the Caucasus mountains. The image reverberating around the world is that of Russia's recidivist invasion against one of its tiny neighbors. Moscow stepped right into the trap Tbilisi had laid for it.
Almost inevitably, Act II leads to Act III, for which Saakashvili is already calling. The conflict is no longer about Russia and Georgia, he says, it is about American/Western values. Georgia is a frontline state in the emerging new confrontation: a democratic David fighting the Russian Goliath. This is serious. Much has been prophesized recently about the advent of a new Cold War, and the recent developments in the Caucasus, at least in their superficial and very partial interpretation, seem to corroborate the story.
Yet, the United States and Europe need to pause and think. Standing up for Georgia is one thing, but following Saakashvili's script is another. So far, each step in the Caucasus drama has put the conflict on a yet higher plane. The next step will no longer be just about the Caucasus, or even Europe. Remember the Guns of August.
Trenin lays out the bare facts, as he sees them.
1. Georgia laid a trap for Russia (therefore the aggressor is Georgia).
2. Russia fell into the trap by sending in troops and tanks and bombing Georgia.
3. Georgia now wants to widen the conflict by calling upon the USA, NATO etc, comparing the conflict to Russia invading Afghanistan etc.
But Trenin then warns the USA, NATO etc of the Guns of August.
What Trenin fails to address is whether Georgia would have set this trap with or without the consent of the USA, NATO, etc. I seriously doubt Saakashvili would have laid such a trap without the consent of Cheney etc, for if the plan failed, as it has, Saakashvili will need all his guile to not swing from the nearest lamppost.
NB in the following comment Trenin states
"This spectacular Act I of the unfolding drama received only muted reaction in the international media."
When you read the papers today, and from yesterday for that matter, note how the massive death toll is reported. Only a handful of media report who actually killed how many. For example, you will read in many papers that 2000 have died in fighting between Georgia and Russia. Your mind will automatically aportion blame 50/50, so that by reporting the death toll this way Russia is equally to blame.
But look at the facts.
It was Georgia who bombed and invaded South Ossetia killing nearly two thousand.
Russia has responded by bombing Georgian military sites, which unfortunately were close to civilian residential areas and accidentally hit. The way the media has generally (a) remained silent on what actually happened on Friday and who killed nearly two thousand civilians, and (b) focusing on Russian aggression (comparable to the bias we see in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict) indicates to me that this was a carefully planned operation from within a rogue USA/NATO circle that controls the media.
I get the feeling that Trenin does not realise who he consorting with at Bilderberg, and is concerned that those he knows through Bilderberg may fall into a WW1-type situation provoked by a madman in Georgia. What Trenin fails to even contemplate is that those who run Bilderberg may well have set the trap themselves.
===================================
From http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/postglobal/needtoknow/2008/08/georgias_risky_move.html
Georgia's Risky Move
By Dmitri Trenin
For months, Russia's tactic was to prove to the west that Georgia was too irresponsible to be considered for admission to NATO. Georgia, for its part, sought to impress on the western publics and governments that Russia, in both Abkhazia and South Ossetia, was an aggressor and occupier. All parties to the conflicts in the two breakaway regions tried to provoke the other side into "showing its true colors".
Acting under time pressure, Georgia has dramatically upped the ante by mounting a large-scale military operation to recover the separatist enclave in South Ossetia. As expected, its now well-trained and well-equipped forces overran the Ossetian formations and took over their capital town, causing a massive loss of life. This spectacular Act I of the unfolding drama received only muted reaction in the international media.
Not so the following Act. President Saakashvili has succeeded in causing Russia to move in with heavy forces. Immediately, the nature of the conflict has been transformed. It is no longer about an obscure ethnic group tucked in somewhere in the Caucasus mountains. The image reverberating around the world is that of Russia's recidivist invasion against one of its tiny neighbors. Moscow stepped right into the trap Tbilisi had laid for it.
Almost inevitably, Act II leads to Act III, for which Saakashvili is already calling. The conflict is no longer about Russia and Georgia, he says, it is about American/Western values. Georgia is a frontline state in the emerging new confrontation: a democratic David fighting the Russian Goliath. This is serious. Much has been prophesized recently about the advent of a new Cold War, and the recent developments in the Caucasus, at least in their superficial and very partial interpretation, seem to corroborate the story.
Yet, the United States and Europe need to pause and think. Standing up for Georgia is one thing, but following Saakashvili's script is another. So far, each step in the Caucasus drama has put the conflict on a yet higher plane. The next step will no longer be just about the Caucasus, or even Europe. Remember the Guns of August.
Saturday, August 09, 2008
SOUTH OSSETIA : BUSH SPEAKS
George Bush has requested that Russia stop bombing Georgia.
I agree with this, but only partly.
I think that Russia should expel Georgia from South Ossetia, and then halt at the Georgian border, and I think this is what will happen. I believe Russia may have the moral and legal right to attack military convoys and installations within Georgia that are supporting and supplying the current Georgian assault on South Ossetia, but possibly restrict attacks to outside a designated area which would contain Georgian civilians. Once these supply and support lines are disrupted then there should only be military action inside South Ossetia until surrender or retreat.
Unwarranted attacks on unrelated civilian areas are totally unacceptable, and will no doubt escalate the situation, and portray Russia as the aggressor, which we now know is not the case, despite the attempts of certain media to obscure the identities of the murderers.
As I understand it, tit-for-tat skirmishes have been ongoing for weeks. But then suddenly Saakashvili lays waste to the capital of South Ossetia, killing one and a half thousand civilians!!
Why? Why the sudden and drastic change in policy? Saakashvili has got a lot of explaining to do.
And why was a UN resolution condemning violence on both sides rejected by the USA, UK and others?
And the declaration of war by Georgia today was taken suspiciously quickly.
Georgia has brought this on itself. Georgia has shown itself to be a bloodthirsty aggressor and untrustworthy. But there is absolutely no way that Saakashvili would have embarked on such bloodshed without the approval of certain circles within NATO and the USA and possibly the EU. However, I think he and they have dropped a bigger and hairier bollock than Bilderberg. I think the diversion of the Olympics was supposed to confuse the situation so that the number of deaths and the blame would be obscured and the identity of the instigator unresolved.
If that was the plan, it has failed.
The whole world knows that Georgia was the bloody aggressor.
One and a half thousand civilians are dead, but there are many, many more survivors who will no doubt willingly relate their experiences when this ends. I hope the media of NATO countries report the experiences of these survivors.
But for Bush to be concerned for civilians is a bit rich. How many Iraqi kids did the Coalition of the Killing blow to pieces to protect them from…being killed by someone else?
I agree with this, but only partly.
I think that Russia should expel Georgia from South Ossetia, and then halt at the Georgian border, and I think this is what will happen. I believe Russia may have the moral and legal right to attack military convoys and installations within Georgia that are supporting and supplying the current Georgian assault on South Ossetia, but possibly restrict attacks to outside a designated area which would contain Georgian civilians. Once these supply and support lines are disrupted then there should only be military action inside South Ossetia until surrender or retreat.
Unwarranted attacks on unrelated civilian areas are totally unacceptable, and will no doubt escalate the situation, and portray Russia as the aggressor, which we now know is not the case, despite the attempts of certain media to obscure the identities of the murderers.
As I understand it, tit-for-tat skirmishes have been ongoing for weeks. But then suddenly Saakashvili lays waste to the capital of South Ossetia, killing one and a half thousand civilians!!
Why? Why the sudden and drastic change in policy? Saakashvili has got a lot of explaining to do.
And why was a UN resolution condemning violence on both sides rejected by the USA, UK and others?
And the declaration of war by Georgia today was taken suspiciously quickly.
Georgia has brought this on itself. Georgia has shown itself to be a bloodthirsty aggressor and untrustworthy. But there is absolutely no way that Saakashvili would have embarked on such bloodshed without the approval of certain circles within NATO and the USA and possibly the EU. However, I think he and they have dropped a bigger and hairier bollock than Bilderberg. I think the diversion of the Olympics was supposed to confuse the situation so that the number of deaths and the blame would be obscured and the identity of the instigator unresolved.
If that was the plan, it has failed.
The whole world knows that Georgia was the bloody aggressor.
One and a half thousand civilians are dead, but there are many, many more survivors who will no doubt willingly relate their experiences when this ends. I hope the media of NATO countries report the experiences of these survivors.
But for Bush to be concerned for civilians is a bit rich. How many Iraqi kids did the Coalition of the Killing blow to pieces to protect them from…being killed by someone else?
SAAKASHVILI SHOOTS HIMSELF IN THE FOOT (TO SHOW HIS LOVE FOR NATO)
Its bleeding obvious what's happened and is happening.
1. With impeccable timing and with the consent of NATO and Cheney, Georgia, the NATO wannabe, has laid waste to the capital of South Ossetia, Tskhinvali, killing over a thousand civilians and several Russians.
2. In response, and with some justification, Russia has sent in its military to repel the Georgians.
3. as always, the media portrays Russia as the aggressor.
4. Saakashvili cries foul, and begs for America to support him against such barbaric aggression.
5. America, the EU and NATO use the bloodshed to frame Russia.
As I understand it, the majority of South Ossetians have been given Russian passports, and support strong links with Russia. So if it turns out that the capital of South Ossetia Tskhinvali has been laid to waste, who is more likely to have done it; Russia, thus having murdered over a thousand of its civilians, and for what? Or Georgia, wanting to show its NATO credentials and to please Cheney and NATO by dragging Russia into a conflict that allows them to engage Russia?
Georgia has announced that it is about to withdraw 1000 of its troops from Iraq. Again, I suspect this was agreed in advance between Georgia and the USA/NATO.
With Georgia desperate for NATO membership, I believe that this Georgian military debacle received the stamp of approval from American, NATO and European leaders.
I see from the website of the British Embassy to Georgia that the British Ambassador to Georgia Denis Keefe was in South Ossetia on the 6th August, where he met with what the British Embassy describe as "the de facto President" of South Ossetia, thereby recognising some independence of South Ossetia. I have asked my MP to report to me exactly what Keefe was told regarding evidence he may or may not have been given regarding the plans by Georgia to attack South Ossetia, and who that evidence was relayed to.
1. With impeccable timing and with the consent of NATO and Cheney, Georgia, the NATO wannabe, has laid waste to the capital of South Ossetia, Tskhinvali, killing over a thousand civilians and several Russians.
2. In response, and with some justification, Russia has sent in its military to repel the Georgians.
3. as always, the media portrays Russia as the aggressor.
4. Saakashvili cries foul, and begs for America to support him against such barbaric aggression.
5. America, the EU and NATO use the bloodshed to frame Russia.
As I understand it, the majority of South Ossetians have been given Russian passports, and support strong links with Russia. So if it turns out that the capital of South Ossetia Tskhinvali has been laid to waste, who is more likely to have done it; Russia, thus having murdered over a thousand of its civilians, and for what? Or Georgia, wanting to show its NATO credentials and to please Cheney and NATO by dragging Russia into a conflict that allows them to engage Russia?
Georgia has announced that it is about to withdraw 1000 of its troops from Iraq. Again, I suspect this was agreed in advance between Georgia and the USA/NATO.
With Georgia desperate for NATO membership, I believe that this Georgian military debacle received the stamp of approval from American, NATO and European leaders.
I see from the website of the British Embassy to Georgia that the British Ambassador to Georgia Denis Keefe was in South Ossetia on the 6th August, where he met with what the British Embassy describe as "the de facto President" of South Ossetia, thereby recognising some independence of South Ossetia. I have asked my MP to report to me exactly what Keefe was told regarding evidence he may or may not have been given regarding the plans by Georgia to attack South Ossetia, and who that evidence was relayed to.
Thursday, August 07, 2008
MORE FILMS
Amistad – a ship of kidnapped Africans destined for slavery rebel against their owners on board the ship transporting them from market to the plantation, but are re-captured and several people claim ownership. After several trials which the slaves win but are appealed, and a defence speech that lasted two days from former President John Quincy Adams, the Africans eventually gain their freedom.
Amazing Grace – the story of William Wilberforce and the struggle to get slavery abolished in the British Empire. How anyone, after watching this, can be proud of being British is beyond me. The British East India Company, The Royal African Trading Company, The South Sea Company and our royal family at the time all contributed to making Great Britain the greatest slave trading nation in the world. Puke!
8mm – Nicholas Cage plays a private investigator hired to find out the authenticity and origin of an apparent snuff film, which was found among the belongings of a recently deceased very wealthy man of British origin. Cage descends into the sexually depraved underground of American society to uncover a sick tale of murder and sexual exploitation, and turns from family man into vengeful murderer.
These films are not my favourites because they reveal the sick side of the human race, the side that the New World Order want introduced to mainstream society in a very, very big way, because they are sick of it going on behind their closed doors. However both Amazing Grace and Amistad show that these sick activities can be beaten if we put our minds to it and try.
8MM is perhaps the most relevant today with the news regarding Madeleine McCann’s apparent ordered kidnap for a Belgian paedophile network, which when investigated in the 1990’s led to revelations of orgies, black masses and satanic ritual sacrifices involving the so-called elite of society. The way the Portuguese authorities tried to pin the disappearance of Madeleine on her parents, together with the reluctance of the Jersey police to open a murder inquiry into the Haut de la Garenne, indicates that this network is at least European, but probably global, and can influence government investigations.
What is it about Portugal? It started the trans-Atlantic slave trade, and is now considered to be the worst place to take your children for a holiday.
Amazing Grace – the story of William Wilberforce and the struggle to get slavery abolished in the British Empire. How anyone, after watching this, can be proud of being British is beyond me. The British East India Company, The Royal African Trading Company, The South Sea Company and our royal family at the time all contributed to making Great Britain the greatest slave trading nation in the world. Puke!
8mm – Nicholas Cage plays a private investigator hired to find out the authenticity and origin of an apparent snuff film, which was found among the belongings of a recently deceased very wealthy man of British origin. Cage descends into the sexually depraved underground of American society to uncover a sick tale of murder and sexual exploitation, and turns from family man into vengeful murderer.
These films are not my favourites because they reveal the sick side of the human race, the side that the New World Order want introduced to mainstream society in a very, very big way, because they are sick of it going on behind their closed doors. However both Amazing Grace and Amistad show that these sick activities can be beaten if we put our minds to it and try.
8MM is perhaps the most relevant today with the news regarding Madeleine McCann’s apparent ordered kidnap for a Belgian paedophile network, which when investigated in the 1990’s led to revelations of orgies, black masses and satanic ritual sacrifices involving the so-called elite of society. The way the Portuguese authorities tried to pin the disappearance of Madeleine on her parents, together with the reluctance of the Jersey police to open a murder inquiry into the Haut de la Garenne, indicates that this network is at least European, but probably global, and can influence government investigations.
What is it about Portugal? It started the trans-Atlantic slave trade, and is now considered to be the worst place to take your children for a holiday.
THE HOUSE OF SADDAM
Last Wednesday we saw the first instalment of a dramatisation that I thought would be a portrayal of Saddam Hussein that would lend legitimacy to the invasion of Iraq in 2003, while leaving out certain uncomfortable facts about how we created Saddam Hussein during the 1980’s. Last week ended in 1980. Last night it began in 1988 and ended in 1991.
So what happened between 1980 and 1988?
I have before me a copy of "Spider’s Web : The Secret History of how The White House Illegally Armed Iraq" by Alan Friedman. Book One covers that period, and details how we covertly armed Iraq during the Iraq-Iran War.
The edition I have does not contain the photograph below, showing good buddies Donald Rumsfeld and Saddam Hussein meeting in 1983 for Rumsfeld to sell some rather nasty chemicals useful to the Iraqi military. Rumsfeld, as member of PNAC, would later campaign for the removal of Saddam Hussein.
After two episodes of The House of Saddam I think the BBC is again being shamelessly used to justify an illegal war.
So what happened between 1980 and 1988?
I have before me a copy of "Spider’s Web : The Secret History of how The White House Illegally Armed Iraq" by Alan Friedman. Book One covers that period, and details how we covertly armed Iraq during the Iraq-Iran War.
The edition I have does not contain the photograph below, showing good buddies Donald Rumsfeld and Saddam Hussein meeting in 1983 for Rumsfeld to sell some rather nasty chemicals useful to the Iraqi military. Rumsfeld, as member of PNAC, would later campaign for the removal of Saddam Hussein.
After two episodes of The House of Saddam I think the BBC is again being shamelessly used to justify an illegal war.
Tuesday, August 05, 2008
OPEN LETTER TO ADMIRAL MICHAEL MULLEN, CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF
Admiral Mullen
Thank you for letting certain people know that you know ‘the plan’ during your recent visit to Israel.
It is of some relief that you have more awareness and concern for humanity than one of your predecessors, General Lyman Lemnitzer, who proposed Operation Northwoods in which Americans were to be deliberately killed to provoke an invasion of Cuba.
There is nothing more terrifying than high-ranking military officers who blindly follow orders without an appreciation of history and current affairs. The ruthless attack on the USS Liberty was, I believe, designed to ignite the final world war in a three-world-war plan that would result in a tyrannical world government. That attack failed. I believe that you have contributed significantly to the failure of the current warmongering to ignite that third world war by a false-flag attack to be blamed on Iran.
But how did we get to the current situation?
September 11th 2001.
A former member of the US Navy Underwater Demolition Team 12, Jesse Ventura, recently commented on The Howard Stern Show that he and his former UDT members believe that the collapse of WTC 7 was a controlled demolition. Such a controlled demolition could not have been organised and executed in the short time that building was on fire on the day. This then implies foreknowledge of the events of 11th September 2001.
If you have not done so already, I would ask that you meet with Jesse Ventura and his colleagues to discuss their concerns.
Once again, thank you for letting certain people know that you know.
ps If you have not done so already, please read my website, www.theconspiracyexplained.com, for details on where the attack on the USS Liberty fits into the three-world-war plan.
Thank you for letting certain people know that you know ‘the plan’ during your recent visit to Israel.
It is of some relief that you have more awareness and concern for humanity than one of your predecessors, General Lyman Lemnitzer, who proposed Operation Northwoods in which Americans were to be deliberately killed to provoke an invasion of Cuba.
There is nothing more terrifying than high-ranking military officers who blindly follow orders without an appreciation of history and current affairs. The ruthless attack on the USS Liberty was, I believe, designed to ignite the final world war in a three-world-war plan that would result in a tyrannical world government. That attack failed. I believe that you have contributed significantly to the failure of the current warmongering to ignite that third world war by a false-flag attack to be blamed on Iran.
But how did we get to the current situation?
September 11th 2001.
A former member of the US Navy Underwater Demolition Team 12, Jesse Ventura, recently commented on The Howard Stern Show that he and his former UDT members believe that the collapse of WTC 7 was a controlled demolition. Such a controlled demolition could not have been organised and executed in the short time that building was on fire on the day. This then implies foreknowledge of the events of 11th September 2001.
If you have not done so already, I would ask that you meet with Jesse Ventura and his colleagues to discuss their concerns.
Once again, thank you for letting certain people know that you know.
ps If you have not done so already, please read my website, www.theconspiracyexplained.com, for details on where the attack on the USS Liberty fits into the three-world-war plan.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)