MONTI SEEMS PROFOUNDLY CONFIDENT GERMANY WILL SOON AGREE TO EUROBONDS

Further to the report in The Independent covered on this blog earlier today, Bloomberg is quoting Mario Monti in supremely confident mood on Eurobonds.

“Europe can have euro bonds soon,” Monti said in an interview on Italian television station La7 yesterday. Germany has an interest in ensuring no country leaves the euro, while Greece will probably remain in the currency region even as “anything can happen,” he said.

“A united Europe is in Germany’s interest,” Monti said. “We’ll have euro bonds if the euro area, and therefore Germany, will want them.”

[source : Merkel May Be Persuaded on Euro Debt-Sharing Compromise, Bloomberg, http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-05-25/merkel-may-be-persuaded-on-euro-debt-sharing-compromise.html, 25/05/2012]

But watch out for more European integration. Merkel will demand something in return.

But we all know it's what they all want anyway.

Let's pretend that they aren't pretending, eh?

Something happened and was agreed in that meeting behind closed doors in Brussels on Wednesday that is not being reported. Merkel has buckled a bit. Draghi is calling for "a leap of political imagination" to save Europe. And pro-Eurobond Monti is even more confident. And this coincides with more and more reports of how the Greek people are suffering, which I would suggest is playing on the guilt of Germany and the German people as a whole for WW2 and their propagation of eugenics and mass genocide, and further comments and reports of the-end-of-the-world and in particular Germany should the Euro collapse.

MERKEL HAS BUCKLED BUT ONLY BY A BIT (SO FAR)

The pressure on Merkel is slowly beginning to show some results.

Germany's opposition leader says that Chancellor Angela Merkel has accepted the need to add a separate set of measures promoting growth to the European Union's treaty enshrining fiscal discipline.

Sigmar Gabriel told reporters after a two-hour closed-door meeting between Mrs Merkel and top politicians that the government has "significantly moved toward accepting a pact for growth and investment".

"The government's blockade on this issue has been broken," Mr Gabriel said. "We see a whole range of possibilities alongside the fiscal pact to do something to foster growth and employment in Europe, especially in fighting youth unemployment," he added.

[source : Angela Merkel now 'backing EU growth measures', The Independent, http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/angela-merkel-now-backing-eu-growth-measures-7785485.html, 24/05/2012]

Though this is not agreement to start issuing Eurobonds with Germany taking all the risk, this does show a significant shift from Merkel's brutal "Austerity! Austerity!".

But with more pressure from the pro-Eurobond Bilderberg cabal, more emotional blackmail reports from Greece about the Greek health service being decimated, mass suicides etc to make Germany feel guilty, and threats of the end of the world, even more so for Germany, should Greece leave the Euro, I see this as the first step towards Eurobonds.

I would not be surprised to find out that Greece was kept in the Euro with the Goldman Sachs deal, and everyone knew about it, with all insiders knowing that something big and emotional, like the current collapse of Greece, would be needed to convince Germany as a whole to issue Eurobonds.

And now Draghi is calling for European leaders to take "a courageous leap of political imagination" to save the failing Euro.

"We have reached a point in which the process of European integration needs a courageous leap of political imagination in order to survive."

[source : Draghi urges governments to take "courageous leap" to save euro, Reuters, http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/05/24/us-euro-ecb-draghi-idUSBRE84N0W620120524, 24/05/2012]

Draghi, like Merkel and Schauble, do support Euroonds but only with further European integration. But they all want further European integration! So this current crisis is looking more and more like a manufactured crisis, to act as another step towards further European integration.

This creep towards a European superstate is shown by Jurriaan Maessen, who reveals that Etienne Davignon produced a document on how the European superstate should be constructed by stealth and behind closed doors.

“(…) implementation of the common policies being introduced or already in force requires corresponding developments in the specifically political sphere, so as to bring nearer the day when Europe can speak with one voice. Hence the importance of Europe being built by successive stages and the gradual development of the method and instruments best calculated to allow a common political course of action.”

The minsters involved also stated that this common political course can be best achieved by setting an example in foreign policy before it can spread to a common economic calling:

“(…) foreign policy concertation should be the object of the first practical endeavours to demonstrate to all that Europe has a political vocation. The Ministers are, in fact, convinced that progress here would be calculated to promote the development of the Communities and give Europeans a keener awareness of their common responsibility.”

[source : Feature Report: Bilderberg Chieftain in 1970: Further European Integration in Gradual, “Successive Stages” Through Informal Meetings, PrisonPlanet, http://www.prisonplanet.com/feature-report-bilderberg-chieftain-in-1970-further-european-integration-in-gradual-%E2%80%9Csuccessive-stages%E2%80%9D-through-informal-meetings.html, 24/05/2012]

Purleaze don't tell me that Somalia is being used as an example of how Europe can cooperate to implement a foreign policy?

Somalia was named on the war-on-seven-nations-in-five-years list revealed to General Wesley Clark shortly after the inside job 9/11. Somalia was also recently named as replacing Afghanistan as the focus of terrorism for Great Britain. And Somalia recently experienced the first attack on the Somali mainland, but this attack was not by NATO, nor the USA, but by the EU! First official reports of this attack, reported here on 15/05/2012 stated that no ground troops were used and that it was all done from the air. But this may not be true.

Amidst reports that European Union forces have for the first time conducted a ground assault in Somalia, sources close to the operation say one critical aspect of the official story has been falsely reported by senior EU officials: that combat forces were not deployed on the ground.

In a statement released by the EU Navfor public affairs office on 15 May, the commander of the EU mission, British Royal Navy Rear Admiral Duncan Potts, stated that the anti-piracy task force operation was conducted entirely via air assault and that, “at no point did EU Naval Force ‘boots’ go ashore.”

Yet this rendition of events has been undermined by statements made by an intelligence operative close to EU anti-piracy operations in the region who told DefenceReport that EU ground forces did, in fact, lead the assault on the Somali mainland.

“If they say no boots touched the ground, it’s because they aren’t allowed to say that – but they have had boots on the ground, for sure,” said the operative who spoke to DefenceReport on the condition of anonymity due to their proximity to on-going classified EU operations.

[source : EU denies “boots on the ground” in Somalia raid, DefenceReport, http://defencereport.com/eu-denies-boots-on-the-ground-in-somalia-raid/, 22/05/2012]

But perhaps this is good. I have a feeling that around 2007 and 2008 a big war on Iran dragging in Russia and China should have occured about the same time as a massive stock market crash triggered by Paulson inexplicably allowing Lehman Brothers to collapse. The purpose was to create so much chaos that we would all beg for a world government.

But no such chaos occured.

Instead, we see the plan for war-on-seven-nations-in-five-years being very slowly implemented and faltering in Syria, and being recognised for what it is; external manipulation of internal affairs using a sordid cast of characters of a very unsavoury nature indeed. And the plan is being exposed more and more, as I hope you are writing to your elected political reps, like I do.

This crisis in the Europe is appearing to be yet another manufactured crisis to create a single Europe by stealth.

WHAT IS THE EUROPEAN PROJECT ALL ABOUT?

Why are so many senior Bilderbergers in favour of Eurobonds while small time Bilderbergers are not?

Before WW1 the European mainland was dominated by the Hapsburgs and the Austro-Hungarian Empire. That Empire was destroyed in WW1, and was replaced in Europe by The League of Nations, the first attempt at world government. The LoN HQ was in Europe, in Geneva, Switzerland, and was financed by the Rockefellers. The LoN failed because the USA voted out of it, despite Woodrow Wilson touring the USA and nearly killing himself in the process, through illness and exhaustion, in a vain effort to persuade the USA to join the LoN.

But the USA only joined WW1 with just a year or so to go, so despite suffering serious casualties did not suffer the same level of casualties as France or Great Britain, or Russia who suffered a Bolshevik Revolution financed by the Rothschilds and Schiffs and run by the Warburgs.

It is of significance that the League of Nations HQ was in Geneva, i.e. Central Europe. It was basically a jack boot that was to stomp on the European face forever.

So with the most powerful nation the USA voting out of the LoN a second world war was engineered, designed to persuade the USA that it had to join a world government. A vicious type of fascism called Nazism was financed by Wall Street in a destroyed Germany, and a vicious type of Communism called Stalinism was financed by Wall street in Russia. A war between these two ideologies was inevitable, given their geographic proximity. Only Poland stood between them, and Hitler and Stalin decided to bring their ideologies closer together geographically with the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact which divided Poland between them. When Hitler invaded poland, having been allowed by Great Britain to develop the Wehrmacht way beyond what was allowed in the Treaty of Versailles, Great Britain declared war on Germany, but did very little to defend the Poland it claimed to be defending.

So why did Great Britain do very little in 'The Phony War'? Because it needed the USA, for finance, for arms, for material, and for men. FDR wanted to assist the anti-Hitler movement so much that he connived with Churchill, his alleged enemy. This was exposed by Tyler kent. The Japanese were allowed to attack Pearl Harbour, which gave FDR the reason he had wanted for a long time to convince a sceptical American public that the USA should join the war in Europe. But FDR could ony declare war on Japan. But Hitler did FDR a favour by declaring war on the USA, and the Lend-Lease program was vastly expanded.

After several years of barbarity and slaughter, this time all over the world, the Axis was defeated and the United Nations was created with HQs in...the USA and Vienna, again financed by the Rockefellers.

Within months of WW2 ending there was a well organised and financed movement to create a single Europe as a bulwark against Soviet Russia. But very few knew that Soviet Russia had been assisted from its creation by Wall Street and to a lesser extent the City of London. And the USA had indeed given the USSR 'the bomb'.

In other words, it was all a con.

The EU and the Euro have gradually developed from the initial meetings of international finance, intelligence and politics at such organisations as ACUE and Bilderberg.

But now the whole European Project is in trouble.

Is this by design? Has the dream of a United Europe been a cruel hoax on those who have worked towards creating their dream? Or is it being milked for as much profit as possible, and/or being controlled at the same time, before being allowed to grow from the ugly duckling into the swan that the likes of Barroso and van Rompuy believe it can be?

What we have to ask is, why are so many and major European Bilderbergers in favour of Eurobonds; Soros, Barroso, van Rompuy, Monti, Cameron, Osborne, Lagarde, etc? While at the same time other Bilderbergers, namely Merkel and Schauble, against Eurobonds? However, Mario Draghi is also opposed to Eurobonds.

But to be more accurate, Merkel, Schauble and Draghi and their ilk are not totally against Eurobonds, but would support them if there was more European integration.

Questions to be answered are
Q: are the NWO prepared to destroy what they have created to create something bigger?
A: YES. Nazi Germany and the USSR were both created by the NWO, and what happened to to them? Nazi Germany was destroyed in WW2, out of which grew the UN, and the USSR was betrayed by NWO agent Gorbachev.

Q: Why was the Berlin Wall created?
A: The idea of empowering Communism, through Lend-Lease and giving it 'the bomb', but then keeping it in check is in total agreement with the three-world-war plan attributed to Albert Pike, as is the creation of Israel and the current warmongering in the Middle East. The Berlin Wall, NATO and wars in South East Asia all helped to keep Communism in check, and also helped to scare Western Europe into sowing the seeds of the EU through The Treaty of Rome etc.

Q: Was the Berlin Wall brought down to create a United Europe?
A: It would appear so. But it also allowed Russia to be economically raped. "the most important and successful...social experiment" of China, David Rockefeller called it, has transformed Asia from Communism to Commucapitalism. The bogeyman became the Islamic Fundamentalist Terrorist, which has led to the wars in the Middle East.

I want to know if Germany knew about the deal between Goldman Sachs and Greece, as revealed in this short BBC video report, "How Goldman Sachs helped mask Greece's debt" at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-17108367 . Or perhaps more importantly, when did Schauble and Merkel know about it? And have they kept quiet about it? And if so, why?

So, in answer to the question, are the NWO prepared to destroy what they create in order to create something bigger? The answer is a clear yes.

In which case, are the Eurocrats who are pressing Merkel to implement Eurobonds being used and betrayed, with the EU and Euro doomed from the start?

Or is Merkel endangering the European Project, and will be dealt with accordingly?

MERKEL IS UNDER PRESSURE AND WILL BUCKLE

Hollande is threatening to veto the appointment of Schauble as Head of the Eurogroup.

After maiden talks in Berlin with his German counterpart, Mr Moscovici issued a veiled threat to block Wolfgang Schäuble’s nomination to lead the Eurogroup of finance ministers unless Berlin gives ground on new measures to boost economic growth. “There will be a comprehensive solution including the important position of Eurogroup head and there are political issues to be considered,” Mr Moscovici said.

His stance reflects the French view that all outstanding questions in the battle against the debt debacle are interlinked.

The German minister is favourite for the Eurogroup post. Asked whether Paris might block his nomination, Mr Moscovici said there was “nothing personal” in the French position.

[source : Noonan hopeful on eurobond talks, Irish Times, http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/breaking/2012/0522/breaking25.html, 22/05/2012]

And Merkel is now getting an earful from all sides.

Giles Merritt, head of the Brussels think-tank Friends of Europe, said the mood is ugly in the corridors of EU power. "The sheer anger directed against Angela Merkel is starting to shake the Germans for the first time. They are beginning to understand how deeply unpopular they have become, and how little time they have to act. The pressure from Beijing and Washington is mounting," he said.

[source : Germany isolated as Latin Bloc calls the shots, The Daily Telegraph,http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/comment/ambroseevans_pritchard/9280847/Germany-isolated-as-Latin-Bloc-calls-the-shots.html, 21/05/2012]

A concession from Germany may be the Eurobond-lite which does not require a referendum or ratification in Germany.

"If the new French President François Hollande now starts constantly calling for euro bonds, he will be doing himself no favors. German taxpayers are opposed to being held liable for other countries -- and rightly so. But maybe Hollande is only creating confusion that will soon dissolve into thin air. Apparently when he talks about 'euro bonds,' he doesn't mean the jointly issued sovereign bonds that put such fear into Germans, but rather what Germans refer to as 'project bonds,' which would be issued to fund large-scale infrastructure projects."

"In that case, he might indeed manage to find a compromise position with Chancellor Angela Merkel, who at the end of the day will have to make some concessions if she doesn't want to destroy the cohesion of the euro zone. Hollande would be able to sell project bonds as a kind of first step toward joint liability, while Merkel could play them down as a limited community project, similar to, say, Germany's financing of the European Investment Bank. Both sides would have saved face. In the best-case scenario, the markets would interpret it as a signal of greater solidarity, thereby slightly easing the pressure on the weaker euro-zone countries. At the moment, that's about as much as we can hope for in the euro zone."

[source : 'Hollande Is Provoking Merkel to the Utmost', Der Speigel, http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/german-commentators-split-over-euro-bond-proposal-a-834214.html, 21/05/2012]

But Merkel will demand further integration but slightly less austerity.

In which case, who will have won?

OECD PROPOSES EUROBONDS BUT WITH MORE AND FASTER INTEGRATION

The OECD today suggests Eurobonds.

Firm fiscal discipline and successful consolidation provide the background conditions for additional measures towards the establishment of a "growth compact". Such measures could include: i) issuance of new jointly guaranteed government bonds to help recapitalise banks and enhance credit availability; ii) increasing jointly guaranteed resources available for the European Investment Bank to fund infrastructure projects; iii) such moves could pave the way to a broader issuance of euro-bonds; iv) redirecting available structural fund resources toward more growth enhancing allocations; and v) a decisive acceleration of single market integration promises to be a major source of growth.

[source : OECD Economic Outlook May 2012]

In other words, Eurobonds with more and faster integration.

Everybody but Merkel and Schauble want Eurobonds, but Merkel and Schauble will agree only if there is more and faster integration.

Isn't this what all the Eurocrats want?

Isn't this what Soros has been saying?

Not that I am supporting Soros' position.

But doesn't all this panicmongering and scaremongering have an aim? Are we all being led up the European garden path?

We have to ask why certain things have occured over the last 100 years or so.

THE LONDON DEBT AGREEMENT

In 1953 Konrad Adenauer negotiatated the cancellation of most of Germany's debts accumulated from before WW2 and also during WW2.

Some of the countries who cancelled their debts in this agreement are

GREECE
SPAIN
ITALY
IRELAND
FRANCE

This cancellation of debt allowed Germany to become the dominant economic force on the European mainland.

And there's Bilderberg Merkel banging on about "Austerity! Austerity!" while Greek pensioners are shooting themselves dead rather than grind out a painful, miserable life of nothingness after Bilderberg Papandreou sold Greece to the IMF and EU after Goldman Sachs helped Greece cover up the true extent of Greece's debts to get Greece into the Euro in the first place?

What a sick joke.

INVESTORS WANT EUROBONDS BUT WITH MORE EUROPEAN INTEGRATION

From reading more articles on Eurobonds it appears that Merkel and Schauble are not alone in their scepticism of Eurobonds, but they are in a large minority.

However, the sceptics agree with Merkel that in order for the Eurobond to work there must be further European integration.

An article in the FT looked at investor attitudes to the Eurobond.

Around 55 per cent of CFA Institute members surveyed agree that eurobonds would alleviate the sovereign debt crisis. A slight majority also considered eurobonds would reinforce financial stability in the euro area. 41 per cent disagreed that eurobonds would improve market efficiency.

Investors in this survey believe that new financial instruments will not cure structural imbalances in trade or help competitiveness, lack of growth and public over-indebtedness. In other words, to be effective eurobonds would have to be associated with deeper structural reforms, fiscal integration and a strong common governance framework.

[source : Investors divided over use of eurobonds, FT, 13/05/2012]

But isn't this what the Eurocrats want too? A bigger, stronger Europe?

Merkel's party has been taking a beating in elections recently, seen as a vote against her austerity measures. So a relaxation of her resistance to growth would go down well in Germany too.

They all want growth. They all want a bigger and stronger Europe. This would also attract investors who would invest in Eurobonds.

But who are the investors? Goldman Sachs? JP Morgan Chase?

Anyhoo, on 23rd May, this Wednesday, at a meeting in Brussels we could well see a significant change in Merkel's position. Most European leaders and finance ministers, including The Oik, see Eurobonds as a quick-and-easy-to-implement solution. Merkel has so far opposed them, but recent elections in Germany have shown that not everyone in Germany loves her brutal austerity, and the statement from the recent Camp David G8 meeting promised jobs and growth, not fascist austerity.

The question is how to spin it so that Merkel does not lose too much face?

Even Rothschild gimp Niall Ferguson says Eurobonds are the only solution, suggesting that Germany and Greece are bluffing, playing chicken but both will avoid a collision at the last second.

“The Greeks say, ‘We’re not going to comply with our commitments’. The Germans say, ‘Then you’re out’. They’re both bluffing.” And so, he argues, Germany — through gritted teeth — will have to concede that Europe as a whole must stand behind the debts of individual nations. Welcome to the era of the eurobond.

But surely this is just the sort of notion to which Germany has hitherto shown such resistance? “The Germans have the biggest interest in preserving the euro,” Ferguson says. “It has been highly advantageous to German business not to have a super-strong Deutschmark, and I think that’s one of the reasons Germans will swerve in this game of chicken, because anything that threatens monetary union is pretty threatening to German business . . . Germans are going to have to make some kind of concession to the periphery. It’s not enough just to say ‘austerity, austerity’.

[source : One Nation (under Germany), http://www.langaa-rpcig.net/+One-nation-under-Germany+.html, 20/05/2012]

Expect Eurobonds and a bit more integration?

THE EUROBOND IS ON

A very significant event occured at Camp David over the weekend. Although the G8 meeting was at Camp David hosted by the naughty boy Obama, he did not open the meeting. Instead Obama asked Mario Monti to open the meeting.

The discussion on the global economic crisis at Camp David was opened at the request of Obama by the Italian prime minister Mario Monti, seen as the power broker in Europe between austerity and growth factions.

[source : Germany isolated over euro crisis plan at G8 meeting in Camp David, The Guardian, http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/may/19/g8-camp-david-germany-euro, 20/05/2012]

Why would Obama ask Monti?

Mario Monti loves Eurobonds, and has been proposing them for months, and has of late been expressing his confidence that he thinks Germany (because Merkel's Minister of Finance, Bilderberg attendee and the latest winner of The Charlemagne Prize Wolfgang Schauble is also against Eurobonds) will sooner or later accept Eurobonds.

Italian Prime Minister Mario Monti is convinced that the time has come to start using euro bonds and that it won't be long before they are implemented. "I'm convinced it will happen. Not immediately, but the time is getting nearer," he told reporters at a conference yesterday. Germany has long opposed a commonly issued bond insisting that Eurozone members must first concentrate on implementing fiscal responsibility. While insisting that the time for talking was over, Monti also pushed for action on prioritizing growth in the euro area. He urged the EU Economic and Monetary Affairs Commissioner Olli Rehn to "take a very active and leading role".

[source : Time for euro bonds has come, says Monti, Yahoo News, http://uk.news.yahoo.com/time-euro-bonds-come-says-083210835.html, 09/05/2012]

Reports of the meeting imply that Merkel was isolated in her steadfast refusal to support the issuance of Eurobonds. However, some reports imply that Merkel is not opposed to Eurobonds per se, but that there should also be closer political and fiscal union of the Eurozone countries.

Mr Hollande has said he will press Berlin to lift its veto on issuing common eurozone bonds - debt issued for the whole currency and implicitly guaranteed by countries such as Germany - or allowing the European Central Bank to lend directly to governments.

Both ideas are "red lines" for the centre-right German government, although Chancellor Angela Merkel has not ruled out eurozone bonds as a long-term prospect if Europe takes more steps towards a tighter political and fiscal union.

[source : France's Hollande to set out eurobond plans at summit, The Daily Telegraph, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/financialcrisis/9277743/Frances-Hollande-to-set-out-eurobond-plans-at-summit.html, 20/05/2012]

And this is where Tsipras comes in, because he could be the ideal man to persuade Merkel (and Schauble) to accept Eurobonds. Tsipras appears to love the Euro as much as Monti loves Eurobonds. Is Tsipras (the Communist) prepared to cede yet more Greek sovereignty to a European Superstate with a single European currency in order to get more jobs?

What would you call that?

Tsipras does not appear to be against a single European Superstate (and why should he with his Communist background?), but is against the austerity being imposed by Germany, EU and IMF.

I think it is great that Greeks are voting against austerity, demanding action, but I cannot understand how selling out to a European Superstate is the answer, particularly if it is run by unelected Bilderberg Eurocrats like Barosso and van Rompuy.

But even Webster Tarpley proposed Eurobonds in his latest World Crisis Radio show of 19th May 2012!

Tarpley, Soros and Monti all agreeing on Eurobonds?

Perhaps the sky really is falling down!

So what does Tsipras have to say about Eurobonds? In a recent interview with CNBC, Tsipras suggested exactly what Hollande, Monti, Soros and Tarpley have suggested.

While Tsipras believes in government control of most sectors of the economy including the banks, Tsipras doesn’t call himself a communist, but rather a leftist or a socialist.

That’s because there is another official communist party in Greece that is anti-European. Tsipras is not. Or at least he wasn’t back in September when asked if he would prefer if Greece would leave the Euro.

“No," he said. "On the contrary, I don’t think it would be wise to leave the euro zone because Greece is a member of the euro zone and that is our competitive advantage. We should try to capitalize on it to make use of it.”

On the face of it, the two positions seem impossible to hold at the same time. If he doesn’t stick to the terms of the bailout, the loan money will stop, and Greece won’t have money to pay government salaries, the army, retirees pensions. They’d have to fire hundreds of thousands of people immediately, or they’d have to drop the Euro and print their own money, to pay people in a new currency.

But Tsipras was convinced that the EU shouldn’t be trying to change Greece. Rather, that Greece should be trying to change the European Union.

“What I think that is really important is to have a change in direction in the EU," he said. "I think it would be good, for example, if the European Central Bank could lend directly to member states, just like the Fed lends money directly to the different states in the U.S.” (The Federal Reserve [cnbc explains] does not lend money to states. It has, however, bought US Federal Government debt, as part of its quantitative easing program.)

“Another good idea would be to have euro bonds because in this way we would be able to overcome certain problems. Because now we have the national governments falling prey to speculation and I think what we really need is a strong community budget. But also an investment plan along the lines of the Marshall plan, which would lead to investment opportunities in Greece and this of course would create jobs which are much needed in the country.”

And he said he felt the financial sector should come under the control of the government.

“We have the solution: to have the banks under the state control," he said. "We have the solution: to have the banks under the control of the European Central Bank. We have the solution: to take loans for European Central Bank in the same interest that the commercial banks take for the European Central Bank. We have the solution: to have the euro bond to take loans in the same interest that the Germans and France take.”

[source : Meet the Greek Leader Who Sent Global Markets Reeling, CNBC, http://www.cnbc.com/id/47342551/Meet_the_Greek_Leader_Who_Sent_Global_Markets_Reeling, 08/05/2012]

So there you have it. Monti, Soros, Hollande, Obama(?), Tarpley and Tsipras all agree on Eurobonds. Merkel does not, but may be coming around to the idea if there is closer political and fiscal union of Europe. And it appears that Tsipras could be the dude to bring the factions together on this.

But Tsipras does not seem to understand what The Federal Reserve is, how it works and who is behind it, and how they financed the Europe Project via ACUE, Bilderberg, etc after they engineered WW2.

This is not good.

Not good at all.

In the above interview Tsipras says, “What I think that is really important is to have a change in direction in the EU,". Does Tsipras want Barosso and van Rompuy and the rest of the Bilderberg traitors kicked out? But the EU institutions preserved? Or perhaps worse, like Merkel wants, with more fiscal and political union?

Just how much of "a change in direction in the EU" does he really want?

Let us pray to The Great Spirit for the Greeks, that they and the rest of the sovereign nation states of Europe are not delivered unto the hands of the Satanist kiddie-fiddling warmongering bankers who engineered WW1 and WW2 and are trying to engineer WW3.

The Eurobond is on.

THE EUROBOND

This is the next stage of the banker coup of Europe; the Eurobond.

This is also a solution that has been proposed by George Soros many times.

As much as Merkel loves Europe and the Euro, she has been reluctant to agree to issue Eurobonds.

Perhaps all the scaremongering about Greece leaving the Euro is directed at Merkel, to accept some kind of renegotiation of Greek debt, as demanded by Tsipras.

And if Merkel still refuses?

Perhaps a scandal? An accident? A challenge?

Merkel is expendable. The European Project is not.

WHY ARE MEDIA BARELY MENTIONING THE COMMUNIST BACKGROUND OF ALEXIS TSIPRAS?

The United Nations and the IMF were created by Communists like Alger Hiss and Harry Dexter White and many other members of the FDR administration. Their aim is one world government and one world currency.

The EU is run by a Communist and multiple Bilderberg attendee Manuel Barosso. The EU and Euro are products of Bilderberg. The EU's aim is to deliver Europe to a one world government with a European currency.

Alexis Tsipras is highly suspicious to me. He has a communist background, and appears to be standing up for the Greek workers, but still wants to stay in the EU with the Euro!

And the major media are making very little of his communist background, even making a joke of it.

Take this interview with The Guardian published today.

Before Greeks went to the polls on 6 May, neither Tsipras nor his party were a name to be reckoned with. If anything both were the butt of vague mockery: a former pony-tailed student communist leading a rag-tag band of ex-Trotskyists, Maoists, champagne socialists and greens. Tsipras's assistants – wielding Louis Vuitton bags and fashionable sunglasses – readily admit they are signed up "militants" mostly of the anti-globalisation cause.

[source : Greek leftist leader Alexis Tsipras: 'It's a war between people and capitalism', The Guardian, http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/may/18/greek-leftist-leader-alexis-tsipras, 19/05/2012]

Any sane anti-globalist should by now have recognised the EU for what it is, and work towards destroying it, not preserving it.

Yes, Tsipras wants growth and a fairer society.

But does he want bankers in jail?

Does he want Greek sovereignty?

Does he think Europe can have a single currency without nations ceding all sovereignty to a European government? Fiscal union without political union?

Take this interview with the BBC published 17th May.

Greek left-wing leader Alexis Tsipras has accused the EU and German Chancellor Angela Merkel of "playing poker with European people's lives" by insisting on austerity measures.

[source : Greek Syriza leader Tsipras attacks EU and Merkel, BBC, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-18094714, 17/05/2012]

There is no mention whatsoever of the Communist history of Tsipras, and the "attack" on the EU as the BBC calls it is merely due to the austerity being imposed by Germany, not an attack on the EU itself as an operation of the warmongering kiddie-fiddling satanists who engineered WW1 and WW2 and now push a global eugenics and depopulation agenda through the UN.

The World Socialist Website also has some questions regarding Tsipras.

However, Syriza does not question the European Union and its institutions, nor the Greek state and its capitalist foundations. Syriza's goal is not the socialist transformation of society in the interests of the working class but to create better conditions for the upper middle class and those parts of the Greek bourgeoisie which are hit particularly hard by the effects of the austerity measures.

Tsipras stresses at every opportunity that he does not want to break with the EU and the euro under any conditions. On Wednesday, he told CNN: “We will do whatever we could do in this direction, to keep Greece inside the euro zone and inside Europe.”[emphasis added]

[source : Greece: The program of Syriza, WSWS,http://www.wsws.org/articles/2012/may2012/syri-m19.shtml, 19/05/2012]

Even the New York Times whitewashes the red history of Tsipras, and gives the impression to me that Tsipras is being prepared for power. Who else in Greece is being given so much media time and space?

But this statement of Tsipras to the NYT perhaps suggests why he is being prepared.

Greece’s problem is a European problem that needs a European solution

[source : Rising Greek Political Star, Foe of Austerity, Puts Europe on Edge, NYT, http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/19/world/europe/tsipras-greek-political-star-puts-europe-on-edge.html?pagewanted=1&hp, 19/05/2012]

Sounds suspiciously like "global solutions to global problems" to me.

But very few ask, who is causing the problems, be they European or global, in the first place?

And how have they been able to finance their problemmongering?

We need to take a good long hard look at Tsipras and Syriza.

CAN YOU SEE WHAT IT IS YET?

Threats and warnings of financial chaos over the Euro.

Threats and warnings of nuclear war from Russia and from any strike on Iran.

And both happening at the same time?

How will you feel in 3 to 6 months time if (and I stress the if because I believe this engineered chaos has been delayed and postponed and delayed even more so that too many people are now aware of the engineers and their diabolical scheme) there is parallel chaos from a financial crash and nuclear war?

Do you think you will be begging for a global fascist dictatorship?

Because that is the plan.

When has Europe ever been united?

Under Hitler? Under the Roman Empire?

These are not good examples of a United Europe are they, and examples that should never ever ever be repeated.

When the WTC and Pentagon were blown up during the inside job 9/11 the New World Order were committed to starting a large war with Russia and China in the Middle East. Some basic maths indicates that 2007/8 was when it was all supposed to happen. Lehman Brothers was supposed to cause a massive financial crisis, one bigger than actually occured, and war on Iran was supposed to happen at the same time. The purpose was to cause so much chaos to provoke calls from the world's population for a global fascist dictatorship, which would then proceed to quickly wipe out 90% of the world's population.

But here we are in 2012.

And with many, many, many more people now awake, including alot of the police and military of the USA if reports from Alex Jones are correct.

We may not all agree on the solution, but all have recognised that a cult of Satan-worshipping kiddie-fiddling warmongering bankers and their minions have been engineering wars and financial crises and terrorism with one aim; to create a global fascist dictatorship.

They are desperate, and becoming more and more desperate by the second. They are now that desperate that they are trying to bring back the most hated and untrusted man in the UK, Tony Blair!

They are a global joke.

They are embarrassing themselves.

Their doom is guaranteed.

So what if a little chaos follows if Greece, then Italy, then Spain leave the Euro. Europe has never been united unless it was under a tyrannical dictatorship.

Little isolated Iceland survived and is a shining example of what can be achieved with positive thinking; a growing economy and minions locked up.

More positive thinking is required. Do not let this scum cast a wicked spell over us so we fall into their trap and succumb to the fear and terror they are trying to bring down upon us.

BAN KI MOON BELIEVES AL QAEDA IS ACTIVE IN SYRIA

Well, duh.

But watch this get the current spin that al-Qaeda-might-get-power-so-we-must-invade-Syria.

===================
From http://www.sana.sy/eng/337/2012/05/18/419808.htm

Ki-moon: al Qaeda Responsible for Two Suicide Car Bombs in Damascus

May 18, 2012


NEW YORK,UNITED NATIONS (SANA)_ U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said that he believed al Qaeda was responsible for two suicide car bombs at al-Qaza Zone in Damascus on May the 10th.

REUTERS quoted Ki-Moon as saying during his meeting with a youth delegation at the UN headquarters yesterday "A few days ago there was a huge, serious, massive terrorist attack. I believe that there must be al Qaeda behind it. This has created again very serious problems,"

The two booby-trapped suicide attacks caused the martyrdom of 55 people and wounded 372 others, 15 sacks of torn-off limbs, not to mention the heavy material damage and destruction.

The so-called 'al-Nousra Front', affiliated to al-Qaeda terrorist organization, claimed the responsibility for the two suicide attacks as well as for other attacks inside Syria.

The ferocity and barbarity of terrorism by foreign-backed armed terrorist groups increased since the arrival of the UN Observers to Syria.

Al-Ibrahim

CHICKEN LICKEN FAILS TO MENTION ICELAND

Multiple Bilderberg attendee Martin Wolf at the FT has today changed his name to Chicken Licken. I expect this to be reflected on the FT website and also on any and all attendee lists of subsequent Bilderberg meeetings he attends (and does not report on), perhaps even in a few weeks time at Chantilly.

Chicken Licken continually claimed that the sky was falling down. Wolf is doing the same today. He warns of chaos, the apocalypse, cats and dogs living together, end of the world type stuff, if Greece leaves the Euro.

Wolf tries to paint a picture of the utter devastation of Europe should Greece leave the Euro, and in doing so injects a few grams of terror and mayhem. In some detail the multiple Bilderberg attendee (who has not once reported on the many Bilderberg meetings he has attended so we can assume he is in total agreement with their agenda otherwise he would have exposed it) scares the shit out of any Greeks reading his latest rant of Bilderberg bullshit.

So what might a collapse entail?

As explained earlier in this series, a cessation of external official funding could trigger a disorderly collapse. The government would default. The European Central Bank would argue that Greek banks no longer possess good collateral, which would prevent it from operating as a lender of last resort. There would be comprehensive bank runs. Athens would impose exchange controls, introduce a new currency, redenominate domestic contracts and default on external contracts denominated in euros.

This would be chaos. Unpaid police officers and soldiers are unlikely to keep order. Looting and rioting could occur. A coup or civil war would be conceivable. Any new currency would depreciate and inflation would soar.

[source : A permanent precedent, FT, 18/05/2012]

Wolf then really goes to town with the doom and gloom, forecasting the end of the world.

Inflation would soar in the periphery; in core nations, deflation would set in. Inflation should erode peripheral nations’ debt mountains, provided they were promptly redenominated in the new domestic currencies. The value of the foreign assets of core countries would fall, their new currencies would soar relative to erstwhile partners and their economies shrink. It would be painful for all.

This analysis may even be too optimistic in its estimate of the impact of a full break-up. The mechanisms at work would be powerful: runs; the imposition of (illegal) exchange controls; legal uncertainties; asset price collapses; unpredictable shifts in balance sheets; freezing of the financial system; disruption of central banking; collapse in spending and trade; and enormous shifts in the exchange rates of new currencies. Further government bailouts of financial systems would surely be needed, at great cost. Big recessions would also worsen already damaged fiscal positions.

Such a break-up would also trigger legions of lawsuits. Beyond this, the EU would be cast into legal and political limbo, with its most important treaties and its proudest achievement in tatters. It is impossible to guess at the result of such a profound change in the European order.

More extreme ranting is concluded with what I think is the true Bilderberg position.

But the eurozone must become a stronger union or it will disappear.

But besides failing to mention what the Bilderberg agenda regarding the Euro is, Wolf also fails to mention Iceland.

Iceland, who told the bankers where to go.

Iceland, who successfully prosecuted some of the protagonists of the crisis that the vampire bankers wrought.

Iceland, once a victim of the vampire bankers who were sucking the economy dry, now has a positive but more importantly independent future and a more equal society.

No wonder the multiple Bilderberg attendee Wolf fails to mention Iceland.

Yes, Iceland did receive some small IMF assistance, but has successfully avoided having the IMF sinks its fangs into Iceland to hand it over to the globalists who caused the crisis in the first place.

Greece should consult with Iceland.

Spain should consult with Iceland.

Italy should consult with Iceland.

Little Iceland has scared the shit out of the bankers and their minions.

That's why during this crisis the bankers and their minions like Wolf fail to mention Iceland.

AND CUE THE IMF?

The FT has today published an article by Charles Goodhart co-authored by Sony Kapoor, MD of Re-Define which calls for the IMF to save the Euro.

Whether or not Greece has to leave the eurozone, and whether or not a growth compact is added to the fiscal treaty, there is likely to be a further call – or calls – on the International Monetary Fund for help with funding firewalls to protect the eurozone from meltdown. The IMF should take this opportunity to be more robust than it has been in the past in dealing with Europe’s problems.

...Historically, the IMF played a crucial role in several developing countries by pushing for urgently needed reforms for which the political will could never have been mobilised from within. This is the role it must play in the eurozone.

An external neutral arbiter such as the IMF can break the logjam. The failure to agree Europe-wide mechanisms for capitalising banks or providing funding guarantees to the banking system made sense for certain member states but was disastrous collectively. The harmful delay in the restructuring of Greek debt and EU leaders’ insistence on self-defeating harsh austerity measures also fall in the same category. The IMF must intervene to save the eurozone from itself.

[source : Only the IMF can break euro logjam, FT, 17/05/2012]

Todays media are almost begging for the Euro to survive, claiming trade will suffer, a depression will occur that will last a thousand years, the skies will fall, total mayhem, cats and dogs living together, end of the world type stuff.

So what does the head of the IMF think about a united Europe with a single currency?

While Greece threatens to tear Europe apart she was in Aachen to praise Wolfgang Schauble who is to be awarded The Charlemagne Prize! This 'most prestigious' award is given to those who have worked tirelessly for total European integration. Lagarde does not sit on the fence in her praise of Schauble or the One Europe ideal.

There is simply no greater advocate for European integration on the stage today than Wolfgang Schäuble. His guiding philosophy is that Europe can only survive and thrive it if binds irrevocably together. As he said himself “nothing is achieved if you cannot convince the people that unity is good”.

...He understands well that Europe must forge ahead with better and deeper integration, to fortify the economic foundations of the union—to make sure it never falls apart.

...Every recipient of the Charlemagne Prize understands something very basic: when the nations come together to address common challenges in a spirit of solidarity, we can attain a virtuous cycle of peace and prosperity, and avoid a vicious cycle of conflict and stagnation.

This is the spirit that guides European integration. The spirit that guides those of us at the IMF and other multilateral institutions. The spirit that animates the life and service of Wolfgang Schäuble.

For Wolfgang Schäuble is a man of great duty, loyalty, nobility, humility. He stands tall today—he stands on the shoulders of giants, and he is also a giant in his own right. He is a true successor of the founders of Europe. A worthy recipient of the Charlemagne prize.

[source : The Legacy of Charlemagne—Wolfgang Schäuble and European Integration, Christine Lagarde, IMF, http://www.imf.org/external/np/speeches/2012/051612.htm, 16/05/2012]

Previous winners of The Charlemagne Prize were either instrumental in creating the Euro dream and have in general been to Bilderberg. Winners include Coudenhove-Kalergi, Adenauer, Schuman, de Gasperi, Monnet, Churchill, Marshall, Kissinger, Kohl, Queen Beatrix of The Netherlands, Delors, Blair, Merkel, Trichet, Clinton. And in typical European fashion the winner in 2002 was...the Euro itself!

Needless to say, Schauble attended Bilderberg, in 2003.

And needless to say, Iceland is not mentioned.

You know Iceland? Who told the bankers where to go, even prosecuting some them, and now with a fully recovered economy after the bankers tried to economically rape them?

Greece should leave Europe and do as Iceland did; prosecute the bankers and go their own way. All members should. They were either tricked by traitors into joining or dragged by their hair by traitors into joining. The whole scheme is a wet dream of the bankers and their masters who created WW1 and WW2. This is what the likes of Lagarde do not mention in their speeches and writings. They are playing on this Euro dream to construct a nightmare of Eurofascism.

All I can say is, if the IMF is indeed asked to save the Euro then it looks like the IMF under Lagarde will quickly sieze the opportunity and impose the IMF's unique brand of loving fascism.

They love you, didn't you know? They love us all. Each and everyone of us. They love us so much that they want 90% of us dead.

IF THE STATE SPONSORED TERRORISM DOESN'T KILL YOU THEN THE STATE SPONSORED FASCISM WILL

Apparently, another £25 billion can be found from the Social Security budget.

The plans include a new crackdown on housing benefit and a “mark two” system of universal credit to help push people off benefits back into full-time, rather than part-time, work. There are also understood to be a range of measures to encourage more women, particularly single mothers, to return to work.

The proposals have been drawn up in a policy paper for the Prime Minister presented by Steve Hilton, the outgoing Number Ten director of implementation, and Iain Duncan Smith, the Work and Pensions Secretary.

Mr Hilton, who left Downing Street yesterday for a post at a Californian university is understood to believe that another £25 billion can be cut from the welfare budget although this level of saving is regarded as “absolute nonsense” by Mr Duncan Smith.

[source : David Cameron considers extra £25bn of welfare cuts, The Daily Telegraph, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/9268411/David-Cameron-considers-extra-25bn-of-welfare-cuts.html, 16/05/2012]

And apparently there is some "really radical thinking".

A Downing Street source said: “There is some really radical thinking going on around welfare, which is the most successful area of government policy so far. Why should people only work part time? Why are young people who are out of work not living at home? Why are we incentivising people to have more children?

Why?

Why? Why? Why?

Why don't we stop attacking the innocents in all this?

Why don't we lock up the Rothschilds instead, who engineered this financial crisis through Bilderberg?

Yet what do the Rothschilds advise we do?

SELL RBS AT A LOSS!

Government should sell part of its stakes in state-backed lenders Lloyds and Royal Bank of Scotland at a loss to kickstart a disposal process that should see investors pay more at later offerings, a senior Rothschild banker told lawmakers.

"It is a good strategy to start a disposal programme with the first tranche at the lowest price," Adam Young, joint head of equity advisory at Rothschild, said on Tuesday.

[source : Government should start cutting bank stakes - Rothschild banker, Reuters, http://uk.reuters.com/article/2012/05/15/uk-rbs-treasury-idUKBRE84E0GG20120515, 15/05/2012]

Yup. The very same Rothschilds who engineered the crisis with their Bilderberg buddies now advise that the government of this Disunited Fascist Kingdom should sell RBS at a loss. At the time RBS was going down and down, RBS was run by two Bilderbergers, Sir Tom McKillop and Sir Peter Sutherland (note the Sir).

So we are supposed to sell RBS at a loss but implemenent further welfare cuts? Does one pay for the other?

I wonder who will buy RBS at a loss? Hmm. Now let me think...

But where will all the jobs come from to give to those on benefits, when the banks won't lend (even though they just creste money out of thin air) and the quasi world government apparatus consisting of the World Bank/IMF/UN wants zero growth anyway to 'save the planet'? (NB the question 'Why are we incentivising people to have more children?' from the DT article referenced above)

I'm telling you this. If the state sponsored terrorists doesn't kill you then the state sponsored fascism will.

No jobs = no food = death.

I'm telling you this too.

THEY WANT MOST OF US DEAD!

DEAD. DEAD. DEAD.

To them we are the scum, the cancer, the plague upon the Earth in peace time, and the donkeys, the cannon fodder in war time.

Well here's some "really radical thinking".

1. lock up the Rothschilds, the Rockefellers, etc, the real scum of this Earth.
2. ban all derivatives and anull all current contracts.
3. create our own money out of thin air to create a planet we can be proud of, not this hell created by bankers who worship Satan and rape and murder kids after we gave them the power to create money out of thin air.

There is so much we can do for this planet, and killing six billion is not one of them.

Stop propagating the cult of doom and death, and start some positive thinking.

You can.

We can.

We all can.

It's easy peasy.

BLOOD, BLOOD, BLOOD AND AGAIN BLOOD

An article in The Bilderberg Post today says all that needs to be said regarding the naked aggression against Syria.

Just last week news that the United States of Aggression was giving the government of Bahrain yet more arms was quietly sneaked out late on Friday hoping that nobody would notice.

But the Bilderberg Post exposes the rancid hypocrisy of the USA; while it arms Bahrain to protect its Fifth Fleet it assists in the arming of the Syrian al Qaeda rebs.

You may have noticed that in the last month or so the Syrian al Qaeda rebs have become more confident, aggressive and violent, and arguably actually more cowardly. Their attacks have become more terrorist, not guerrilla. Guerrilla warfare attacks military targets only and no civilian casualties occur. But as the last few terrorist attacks in Damascus have shown the Syrian al Qaeda rebs do not give a damn about civilians.

The Bilderberg Post reports that the Syrian al Qaeda rebs are now receiving more and better arms paid for by Saudi Arabia and Qatar with logistics and advice provided by the USA.

Syrian rebels battling the regime of President Bashar al-Assad have begun receiving significantly more and better weapons in recent weeks, an effort paid for by Persian Gulf nations and coordinated in part by the United States, according to opposition activists and U.S. and foreign officials.

Obama administration officials emphasized that the United States is neither supplying nor funding the lethal material, which includes antitank weaponry. Instead, they said, the administration has expanded contacts with opposition military forces to provide the gulf nations with assessments of rebel credibility and command-and-control infrastructure.

[source : Syrian rebels get influx of arms with gulf neighbors’ money, U.S. coordination, The Washington Post, http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/syrian-rebels-get-influx-of-arms-with-gulf-neighbors-money-us-coordination/2012/05/15/gIQAds2TSU_story.html, 16/05/2012]

The money for these arms comes from the $100 million the Utopian Democracies of Saudi Arabia and Qatar committed at the Friends of Syrian Terrorists meeting just before the Kofi Annan six point peace plan was agreed.

So what effect has that money had? Well, it was ineveitable.

Opposition activists who two months ago said the rebels were running out of ammunition said this week that the flow of weapons — most still bought on the black market in neighboring countries or from elements of the Syrian military — has significantly increased after a decision by Saudi Arabia, Qatar and other gulf states to provide millions of dollars in funding each month.

And the Kurds are being brought in.

Administration officials also held talks in Washington this week with a delegation of Kurds from sparsely populated eastern Syria, where little violence has occurred. The talks included discussion of what one U.S. official said remained the “theoretical” possibility of opening a second front against Assad’s forces that would compel him to move resources from the west.

This reinforces the report in Press TV yesterday.

Some parts of Iraq, especially in Anbar Province and the Kurdistan region, which is ruled by Massoud Barzani, have been chosen for the purpose because Barzani is closely working with Israel’s intelligence agency, Mossad.

[source : US, Saudi Arabia plan to destroy Syria: Report, PressTV, http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2012/05/15/241358/us-saudi-arabia-mull-destroying-syria/, 15/05/2012]

So how would you describe this naked aggression? In typical doublespeak, to the State Department murder is charity.

We are increasing our nonlethal assistance to the Syrian opposition,

Which begs the question, as I ask William Hague; what is "nonlethal assistance"?

If you help in the logistics of terrorism, by transporting the weapons, or just advise how best and when to use them, but do not actually pull the trigger, then is that "nonlethal assistance"?

And we should also ask, what are these "better" weapons that the Syrian al Qaeda rebs are receiving? Bombs need explosives, not guns and bullets.

What we are seeing in Syria is naked aggression. It has nothing to do with freedom and democracy. This aggression was enabled by another act of aggression, the inside job 9/11, which at the very least was allowed to happen, but alot of the evidence points to 9/11 being a 100% inside job, with the Saudis and the DFK and Israel all contributing in one way or another. And the aim of 9/11 was to provide "the new Pearl Harbor" for the USA to go on a bloody warmongering rampage.

And this the United States of Aggression has done.

I believe this aggression has been engineered to trigger WW3. This aggression is supported by the manipulation of the Missile Defence Shield for a first strike against Russia, and not to defend against Iran.

On the first day of this year The Daily Star quoted an unnamed British security official, who said regarding Syria,

"This is all going like Libya but this will be bigger and bloodier."

Too bloody right, mate!

Too bloody right.

Hague and Cameron and Burt and their ilk, all supporters if not protagonists of this terrorism and bloodshed, should hang their heads in shame.

HOW DARE THEY LAY WREATHES AT THE CENOTAPH ON REMEMBRANCE DAY!

This is not what our fathers and grandfathers fought in WW1 and WW2 for.

I am reminded of a scene in the BBC documentary series The Nazis : A Warning from History, in which an assistant to Hitler describes a moment when Hitler was at Berchtesgarden around the time the The Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact was being signed. One attendant at Berchtesgarden warned Hitler of,

"...blood, blood, blood and again blood. Destruction and terrible suffering. Blood and again blood."

That scene is shown in this video clip.


The agreements reached as described by Seymour Hersh in The Redirection can be oh so easily destroyed.

Just like The Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact.

Just like Britain declared war on Germany to start WW1 after tricking Germany into invading Belgium.

Just like Britain declared war on Hitler after Britain allowed Hitler to build up the Wehrmacht beyond what was allowed by The Treaty of Versailles, and Wall Street had financed Hitler's rise to power and his eugenics and racial hygiene programs.

Just like the USSR was the friend of the UK and USA during WW2, but after WW2 the USSR became "the evil empire".

There is an agenda.

PLAN Q FOR SYRIA

Press TV is reporting an increased desperation in the war on Syria.

Plan A was to get al Qaeda to overthrow Assad.

Plan B was to create a humanitarian corridor running from Turkey into Syria.

Plan C was to claim we need to invade Syria because al Qaeda might get into power (see plan A)

These have failed. Plans D through to P, including trying to get the UN Observer Mission killed to claim the chaos requires R2P, have also failed.

So what's the plan now?

...Saudi intelligence has reached an agreement with US and Israeli security companies based in Geneva to increase armed conflicts in Syria without engaging other countries. The conflicts will be led by retired military and intelligence experts that are theoretically in agreement with al-Qaeda.

...the Americans are going to create small protected areas in Lebanon and use them as military training camps. These camps will be established by the US, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Turkey to be used by al-Qaeda and the Syrian opposition.

Saudi Arabia will, in the meantime, work on Syria’s big nomadic tribes most of which live around the city of Deir ez-Zor and in the Syrian Desert which extends up to Homs.

[source : US, Saudi Arabia plan to destroy Syria: Report, PressTV, http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2012/05/15/241358/us-saudi-arabia-mull-destroying-syria/, 15/05/2012]

The aim is still the same; to split Iran from Syria to isolate Iran, to isolate Hezbollah in Lebanon, and to kick out Russia.

And that is why this will lead to WW3.

And that is why Israel was created.

This exposes the total complicity of Israel, not just in this warmongering, but also in 9/11.

As stated many, many times before, A Clean Break was written in 1996 calling for war on Iraq, Iran, Hezbollah and Syria. This then morphed into PNAC's Rebuilding America's Defenses, both documents were written by the same bunch of warmongering Zionazis. This then morphed into the war-on-seven-nations-in-five-years plan revealed to General Wesley Clark shortly after the inside job 9/11, which enabled all this warmongering.

Rafik Hariri was assassinated to cause enough resentment against Syria for three purposes;
1. to drive Syria out of Lebanon,
2. which would isolate Hezbollah in Lebanon,
3. so Israel could try to destroy Hezbollah, and tried and failed in 2006.

It was initially claimed that Hezbollah killed Hariri. Those claims have now been proven to be false.

Very evil elements inside Israel, Saudi Arabia, the UK and USA did the inside job 9/11.

EUROPE ATTACKS SOMALIA

Somalia is one of those seven nations named on the list revealed to General Wesley Clark shortly after the inside job 9/11 that were to be attacked.

There was a conference regarding Somalia a few months ago in London at which attacks on Somalia were discussed but not explicitly agreed. A few weeks later Great Britain announced that it was now switching the focus of its anti-terrorism campaign from Afghanistan to Somalia, and a treaty was amended to allow attacks on the Somali mainland.

That first attack on the Somali mainland has now taken place.

Please note the language used in the following report.

First, "Europe" is the attacking force, not NATO, under UN SCR 1851 (so has backing from Russia and China).

Second, the purpose given in this case is "humanitarian". R2P is the new mantra. Pirates based in Somalia have been stealing aid. But Somalia is, as the UK now alleges, the most dangerous place in the world because of the presence and alleged strength of al Qaeda there, who reportedly control the bulk of the country except for the main population centres. And Somalia was recently reported to have vast oil resources just off the coast.

Third, this first report of the attack suggests that no Somali citizens were killed, and the attacks were all from the air and there were no boots on the ground. But we all know that airborne attacks are rarely 100% accurate and "collateral damage" usually occurs. Just ask civilians in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen, Libya about the accuracy of airborne attacks by the military forces of the West.

Is this yet another case of killing civilians to save them? Await further reports.

=========================
From http://www.eunavfor.eu/2012/05/eu-naval-force-delivers-blow-against-somali-pirates-on-shoreline/

EU Naval Force Delivers Blow Against Somali Pirates On Shoreline
May 15, 2012, published in Featured, News, Press Releases by EU NAVFOR Public Affairs Office

15th May – Earlier today, following the decision taken on 23 March 2012 by the Council of the European Union to allow the EU Naval Force to take disruption action against known pirate supplies on the shore, EU forces conducted an operation to destroy pirate equipment on the Somali coastline.

The operation was conducted in accordance with the United Nations Security Council Resolution 1851 and has the full support of the Transitional Federal Government of Somalia. The focused, precise and proportionate action was conducted from the air and all forces returned safely to EU warships on completion. Whilst assessment is on-going, surveillance of the area during the action indicates that no Somalis were injured ashore as a result of EU action.

Speaking about the operation, the Operation Commander of the EU Naval Force, Rear Admiral Duncan Potts said “We believe this action by the EU Naval Force will further increase the pressure on, and disrupt pirates’ efforts to get out to sea to attack merchant shipping and dhows. The local Somali people and fishermen – many of whom have suffered so much because of piracy in the region, can be reassured that our focus was on known pirate supplies and will remain so in the future.”

At no point did EU Naval Force ‘boots’ go ashore. Rear Admiral Potts went on to say “The EU Naval Force action against pirate supplies on the shoreline is merely an extension of the disruption actions carried out against pirate ships at sea, and Operation Atalanta remains committed to fighting piracy off the Horn of Africa and the humanitarian mission of protecting World Food Programme ships that bring vital aid to the Somali people.”

Operation Atalanta is part of the EU’s comprehensive approach to tackling symptoms and root causes of piracy in the Horn of Africa and the EU strategic framework for that region adopted in November 2011. Currently there are 9 warships in the EU Naval Force and 5 Maritime Patrol Aircraft.

The reach of Somali pirates is vast; they have attacked merchant ships up to 1,750 miles off the Somali coast. Preventing them getting out to sea is a crucial step in removing their impunity ashore and to further the success of counter-piracy operations.

FOOTBALL NIL : SICKNESS TWO

Football lost yesterday.

The beautiful game has grown into something very ugly.

Manchester City FC were bought four years ago by a multi billionaire from the UAE, who is also a member of the ruling family of Abu Dhabi. The UAE along with Saudi Arabia and Qatar are driving the bloodshed in the violent Sunni revolutions in Libya, Syria and soon Iran.

The transfer totals show that since the purchase in 2008, MCFC have spent nearly a half billion pounds net (purchases - sales), nearly ten times the net of MUFC in the same period. Along with other funny money we can safely say that City bought the title for £1 billion, in less than 4 years.

AND ALL FROM JUST ONE MAN!

WHOSE FAMILY ARE DRIVING SOME VERY BAD TROUBLE IN THE MIDDLE EAST!

MUFC, supposed to be one of the richest clubs in the world with a massive following abroad, get a lot of their income from marketing abroad, but their finances are not that solid now after the Glazers dumped the debt that they assumed to buy the club onto the club itself!

But I watched the MCFC v QPR game in a pub yesterday. Most present were City. When QPR scored their second goal to go 2-1 up several City 'fans' started to sing the sickest song in football, "Who's that dying on the runway? Who's that dying in the snow?...", in reference to the 1958 Munich crash in which the Busby Babes were virtually wiped out.

Final score
Football 0 : Sickness 2

THE REDIRECTION

If you want to have a much better understanding of The Arab Spring and the violence in the Middle East then you must read the article by Seymour Hersh entitled The Redirection that has been reported by Tony Cartalucci.

A 2007 New Yorker article written by renowned journalist Seymour Hersh revealed a plan under the Bush Administration to organize, arm, train, and deploy a regional army of Sunni terrorists, many with ties directly to Al Qaeda, in a bid to destabilize and overthrow both Syria and Iran. The plan consisted of US and Israeli backing, covertly funneled through Saudi proxies to conceal Washington and Tel Aviv’s role, in building the Sunni extremist front.

[source : Sunni Extremists Ravaging Syria Created by US in 2007, Prison Planet, http://www.prisonplanet.com/sunni-extremists-ravaging-syria-created-by-us-in-2007.html, 11/05/2012]

The Hersh article was published in 2007, and details agreements that had been reached to create a violent Sunni Muslim movement to undermine Syria, Iran and Hezbollah. According to Hersh there were at least four agreements, and the four Hersh reports are

First, Israel would be assured that its security was paramount and that Washington and Saudi Arabia and other Sunni states shared its concern about Iran.

Second, the Saudis would urge Hamas, the Islamist Palestinian party that has received support from Iran, to curtail its anti-Israeli aggression and to begin serious talks about sharing leadership with Fatah, the more secular Palestinian group.

The third component was that the Bush Administration would work directly with Sunni nations to counteract Shiite ascendance in the region.

Fourth, the Saudi government, with Washington’s approval, would provide funds and logistical aid to weaken the government of President Bashir Assad, of Syria.

[source : The Redirection, The New Yorker, http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2007/03/05/070305fa_fact_hersh?currentPage=all, 05/03/2007]

All this has come to pass, most notably the fourth point, which has been achieved by the Friends of Syrian Terrorists meetings at which The Utopian Democracy of Saudi Arabia and Qatar pledged $100 million to blow up and snipe at Syrian children. William Hague also coughed up to provide 'nonlethal' assistance to the Syrian al Qaeda rebs, though what Hague's definition of 'nonlethal' is is unknown. I wonder if Hague's definition of 'nonlethal' is 'as long as it doesn't kill him or his masters but kills innocent Syrian men, women and children then it's OK'? Vests and radios may not kill but can be used in operations that do kill.

The rise of The Muslim Brotherhood and Salafists in North Africa, in particular in Egypt, is of great significance. It shows that The Arab Spring is a complete fraud. During the Egyptian Revolution last year the two main mouthpieces of the Anglo-American Establishment, The FT and The Bilderberg Post, portrayed the Muslim Brotherhood as reformed, cute and cuddly, and wouldn't hurt a fly. But at the same time the MB leadership was issuing calls for war on Israel, calls that were not reported in the NATO media. In particular the Rand Corporation, who (more than) coincidentally demand a WW3, produced a report in support of the MB. As Egypt begins to create a new form of government, the MB and their ilk are openly stating that the peace agreements with Israel are now null and void.

The article by Hersh suggests that Israel is complicit in all this.

I would warn Israel that it has been caught in a trap.

Just like the British enticed Germany to invade Belgium on their way to Paris after their Freemasonic dupes assassinated Arch Duke Ferdinand, promising to Germany that they would stay out of any war on the European continent but as soon as Germany invaded Belgium the British cited an obscure treaty they had with Belgium which was not binding and declared war on Germany. As a result of this the conditions were created in Russia such that Lenin could be sent in from Germany with a train full of Rothschild Gold, and Trotsky could be sent in from New York to overthrow the Tsar, and the first attempt at world government was made. Out of the ruins rose Hitler and Stalin.

Just like Wall Street and The City of London assisted the rise of both Hitler and Stalin, who had extreme opposing politics, such that a major war between them was inevitable. Such a war was required to persuade the world, the USA in particular, that a world government was the answer to all the world's problems. Both Hitler and Stalin trusted their benefactors. Hitler wanted to join with Great Britain to defeat Bolshevism and received finance for his eugenics and racial hygiene programs from Wall Street. Stalin was built through Lend-Lease and at the end of WW2 was given the bomb to create global tension and The Cold War.

Just like now, Israel is playing a very, very, very dangerous game here trusting this operation of Redirection. If this plan achieves its aims then Israel will be surrounded by extreme Islamists. But who do these violent beheading Sunni extremists hate more? Shiites? Or The Jews?

As Hersh quotes Vali Nasr

“The Saudis have considerable financial means, and have deep relations with the Muslim Brotherhood and the Salafis”—Sunni extremists who view Shiites as apostates. “The last time Iran was a threat, the Saudis were able to mobilize the worst kinds of Islamic radicals. Once you get them out of the box, you can’t put them back.”

Zionists have been instrumental in this drive to war in the Middle East. They wrote A Clean Break and Rebuilding America's Defenses, calling for war on Iraq, Iran and other neighbouring nation states. This morphed into the war-on-seven-nations-in-five-years plan revealed to General Wesley Clark while Zionists openly ruled the USA, and it is painfully obvious that this plan is still being implemented through Obama, with wars on Iraq, Lebanon and Libysa under the belt, and now with threats of Turkey citing Article 5 of The Washington Treaty to circumvent the UN and allow NATO to start war on Syria.

And it should be painfully obvious that war on Russia and China is the real aim of the inside job 9/11 and of all this warmongering in the Middle East. NATO is really taking the limeade with its excuses over the missile defence shield. And the encirclement of China in the Pacific and South Asia seas has only one aim.

This all fits in with the theory that they are well behind in their plans to start WW3 after doing the inside job 9/11, and they are becoming increasingly desperate, now prepared to risk openly allying with al Qaeda while citing al Qaeda as the reason to take all our freedoms. This is why they are trying to use the recent terrorism in Syria as an excuse to invade Syria, claiming that al Qaeda might take over if we don't invade.

BUT IT IS THE UTOPIAN DEMOCRACY OF SAUDI ARABIA AND QATAR FINANCING THE TERROR!