Friday 15th November 2013 is:
1. Bankers in Need Day (still)?
2. Children in Need Day (again)?
3. Cutthroat Jihadis in Need Day (still)?
Thursday, November 14, 2013
NEED I SAY MORE
What we see today in the state of Israel is another necessary fulfillment – a spectacular one, indeed – necessary to return of the Messiah, or the Christ. What we see in Yeshua is the personal fulfillment of all the prophets foretold regarding salvation.
Why would anyone calling himself a Christian seek to delegitimize those prophecies?
Why would anyone calling himself a Christian seek to deny the words of the prophets – the same prophets who foretold the coming of our Savior and His return?
What is the basis of the Christian faith without the words of the prophets?
God is the same yesterday, today and tomorrow. He doesn’t renege on His promises. His covenant with the children of Abraham is eternal, and the basis of the Christian faith is an understanding that we, the gentiles, are “grafted in” to that promise through the blood of Yeshua.
[source : Why All Christians Should Embrace Israel, WND, http://www.wnd.com/2013/11/why-all-christians-should-embrace-israel/, 14th November 2013]
IT IS WAR WITH IRAN EITHER WAY
Israel will have war on Syria using the USA and al Qaeda as cannon fodder. No matter what anybody does or says. It's war.
They didn't do 9/11 for fun, because they were bored.
They didn't write A Clean Break because some Zionists had a pen and a piece of paper.
They didn't form PNAC and write Rebuilding America's Defenses for something to do.
They didn't do 9/11 for fun, because they were bored.
They didn't write A Clean Break because some Zionists had a pen and a piece of paper.
They didn't form PNAC and write Rebuilding America's Defenses for something to do.
Wednesday, November 13, 2013
SO WE WENT INTO AFGHANISTAN TO HUNT BIN LADEN, HUH?
After 19 Muslims with boxcutters allegedly hijacked 4 passenger planes, outwitted the most powerful military machine in the world for nearly 2 hours, and flew the planes into the WTC and even The Pentagon(!!), we invaded Afghanistan.
We invaded Afghanistan because that is where we were told the ringleader, Osama bin Laden, was.
We weren't told that on several occasions before, we could have either had bin Laden handed to us on a plate, or assassinated him. On each occasion we did nothing.
We weren't told that bin Laden lived in Wembley, had trained in Scotland with the SAS, and that his ilk lived and recruited terrorists in London (or Londonistan) due to a Covenant of Security with MI5.
Something else we weren't told was that bin Laden was dying from Marfan Syndrome and required regular kidney dialysis.
After nearly 10 years of hunting bin Laden, and when Obama was in serious trouble over his resident status, bin Laden was suddenly traced to a house in Pakistan, and allegedly taken out.
Between 9/11 and his alleged death in 2011, bin Laden rarely appeared in a video, instead releasing audio tapes which we were told, after thorough voice analysis, were made by him. When he did release a video, he looked remarkably different, almost transformed, as if he had died from Marfan Syndrome shortly after 9/11 and he had been replaced by an actor.
BUT THAT IS WHAT HAPPENED!
When we invaded Afghanistan the Taliban had almost eradicated opium farming there. But now, after 12 years of NATO presence, opium harvests have hit a new record high.
We invaded Afghanistan because that is where we were told the ringleader, Osama bin Laden, was.
We weren't told that on several occasions before, we could have either had bin Laden handed to us on a plate, or assassinated him. On each occasion we did nothing.
We weren't told that bin Laden lived in Wembley, had trained in Scotland with the SAS, and that his ilk lived and recruited terrorists in London (or Londonistan) due to a Covenant of Security with MI5.
Something else we weren't told was that bin Laden was dying from Marfan Syndrome and required regular kidney dialysis.
After nearly 10 years of hunting bin Laden, and when Obama was in serious trouble over his resident status, bin Laden was suddenly traced to a house in Pakistan, and allegedly taken out.
Between 9/11 and his alleged death in 2011, bin Laden rarely appeared in a video, instead releasing audio tapes which we were told, after thorough voice analysis, were made by him. When he did release a video, he looked remarkably different, almost transformed, as if he had died from Marfan Syndrome shortly after 9/11 and he had been replaced by an actor.
BUT THAT IS WHAT HAPPENED!
When we invaded Afghanistan the Taliban had almost eradicated opium farming there. But now, after 12 years of NATO presence, opium harvests have hit a new record high.
Despite efforts to curb Afghan’s opium culture, cultivation has hit record levels as NATO forces prepare to exit the country. The UN warned warlords may be the biggest benefactor of the situation.Our ruling elite have been running the opium/heroin market for centuries. They ran the Opium Wars against China when China refused to allow the British to dump their opium in Chinese docks in order to destroy China from within.
The report, the Afghanistan Opium Survey for 2013, provides little cause for optimism among countries that have witnessed a surge in incidences of heroin abuse among their populace since US-led forces started a military offensive against the Taliban on Afghan soil in 2001.
Afghanistan, long the world’s main heroin supplier, has seen its total area of poppy seed plantations explode to 516,000 acres - a 36 percent increase from 2012, according to the report, released on Wednesday.
[source : Poppy fields forever? Record opium output boosts Afghan warlords’ power base, Russia Today, Poppy fields forever? Record opium output boosts Afghan warlords’ power base, 13th November 2013]
HOW NATO SMUGGLES JIHADISTS INTO SYRIA
Just last week The Three Stooges struggled to keep their faces straight as they attacked Ed Snowden for aiding the enemy, al Qaeda. They said sweet FA about the Covenant of Security, or that Michael Adebalajo was under surveillance preaching on the streets of Woolwich begging Muslims to go to Syria to slit the throats of Syrian children with blunt breadknives, before he butchered Lee Rigby.
The Three Stooges claimed they needed universal surveillance to stop al Qaeda.
But here is how our NATO ally Turkey is aiding the Jihadists into Syria.
The Three Stooges claimed they needed universal surveillance to stop al Qaeda.
But here is how our NATO ally Turkey is aiding the Jihadists into Syria.
How #NATO helps AlQaeda cross the border into #Syria - CNN report https://t.co/btA9W2VRq6
— Partisangirl (@Partisangirl) November 12, 2013
CAMERON HIDING BLAIR'S WAR CRIMES
David Cameron blocks publication of report that exposes Tony Blair's #Iraq war crimes. By @LindseyAGerman http://t.co/JKVQBgGHKe
— Stop the War (@STWuk) November 12, 2013
Keeping it in the family (of privileged fascist gangstaz)
PRIVILEGED FASCIST IAIN DISGRACE SMITH IS RUNNING SCARED
What is it with these Tory ministers?
William Jihadi Hague.
And with Iain Duncan Smith, known as IDS, the D now stands for disgrace. However, it would be more accurate if his name was shortened to IBDS, the B standing for Bloody.
For Iain Disgrace Smith has blood on his hands, and yesterday neither he or his fellow ministers were prepared to defend IDS' dreaded Bedroom Tax in The Marsten House. And the Tories who did attend a debate on that inhuman policy revealed their inner cold blooded reptile, one of them calling for feckless fathers to be placed in chains! Just what that has to do with the Bedroom Tax, I'm not quite sure.
But do not be surprised when the Tories bring back the workhouse.
Readers should note:
1. IDS lives married into a very wealthy family, and lives rent free in a 10 bedroom mansion with all the essential things in life, like a swimming pool and tennis courts;
2. the purpose of the dreaded Bedroom Tax was to force people considered to be living in accommodation too large for their needs into smaller accommodation, yet the government knows that that smaller accommodation is not available, or if it is then it is in the much more expensive private sector.
William Jihadi Hague.
And with Iain Duncan Smith, known as IDS, the D now stands for disgrace. However, it would be more accurate if his name was shortened to IBDS, the B standing for Bloody.
For Iain Disgrace Smith has blood on his hands, and yesterday neither he or his fellow ministers were prepared to defend IDS' dreaded Bedroom Tax in The Marsten House. And the Tories who did attend a debate on that inhuman policy revealed their inner cold blooded reptile, one of them calling for feckless fathers to be placed in chains! Just what that has to do with the Bedroom Tax, I'm not quite sure.
But do not be surprised when the Tories bring back the workhouse.
Readers should note:
1. IDS lives married into a very wealthy family, and lives rent free in a 10 bedroom mansion with all the essential things in life, like a swimming pool and tennis courts;
2. the purpose of the dreaded Bedroom Tax was to force people considered to be living in accommodation too large for their needs into smaller accommodation, yet the government knows that that smaller accommodation is not available, or if it is then it is in the much more expensive private sector.
Tuesday, November 12, 2013
WORLD ZIONIST DAILY
World Net Daily has once again exposed its bona fide Zionist credentials.
Today WND indirectly accuses Iran of building a plutonium reactor, citing one Retired Navy Captain Chuck Nash. The WND article calls Nash "an expert on the Iranian nuclear threat", but, for whatever Zionist reason, fails to mention who Nash is an 'expert' for.
Can you guess?
I'll give you a clue.
NASH WORKS FOR A SIGNATORY TO THE PNAC STATEMENT OF PRINCIPLES!
Yes. Nash works for The Centre for Security Policy, which was founded by Frank Gaffney, who is the current President of CSP.
So Gaffney is up there with Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and Paul Wolfowitz. And for whatever Zionist reason, WND fails to mention this.
But for fairness, I will copy what Nash had to say, but which also shows his bias.
Nash was recently criticised for being one of those commentators who frequently appeared in the media to push a pro-war agenda without revealing their industrial and commercial ties, much like WND has done. Here is what Nash had to say about Syria earlier this year:
So pro-war on Syria Nash, who works for PNAC mobster Gaffney, is cited in a WND article praising Netanyahu and Israel, but the article omits any mention of Nash's current links or hunger to illegally install al Qaeda as de facto rulers of Syria.
Hmm. Is that journalism? Or propaganda?
Today WND indirectly accuses Iran of building a plutonium reactor, citing one Retired Navy Captain Chuck Nash. The WND article calls Nash "an expert on the Iranian nuclear threat", but, for whatever Zionist reason, fails to mention who Nash is an 'expert' for.
Can you guess?
I'll give you a clue.
NASH WORKS FOR A SIGNATORY TO THE PNAC STATEMENT OF PRINCIPLES!
Yes. Nash works for The Centre for Security Policy, which was founded by Frank Gaffney, who is the current President of CSP.
So Gaffney is up there with Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and Paul Wolfowitz. And for whatever Zionist reason, WND fails to mention this.
But for fairness, I will copy what Nash had to say, but which also shows his bias.
“They should not be enriching any uranium. Reactors that are used for nuclear power burn three-and-a-half percent enriched uranium. Twenty percent is for medical isotopes, and that’s what Iranians are claiming they need. Ninety percent, and you’re talking weapons grade,” said Nash, who noted that despite Iran’s insistence the nuclear program is not for weapons, the facts to the contrary are very clear.
“They’re building a plutonium reactor at the heavy water facility at Arak,” he said. “You don’t use plutonium in power plants. Plutonium is used for nuclear weapons. So the fact that we would allow them to do enrichment is against all the rules and treaties. Once you give into these people, they won’t take an inch. They’ll take a mile.”
...So are the discussions timed to stall Israeli action?
“It very well could be because Prime Minister (Benjamin) Netanyahu once said, ‘Leadership in the absence of a threat is very difficult, but leadership in the presence of a clearly defined threat is a no-brainer,’” Nash said. “He and the Israelis have been facing a direct, existential threat from Iran for many decades, and now they are on the verge of being able to produce their own nuclear weapons. And what they are not producing and what they are conducting inside the borders of Iran, they are working with the North Koreans and their research programs. It’s not just static inside Iran. We have to look at what’s going on in North Korea, because they are joined at the hip in these development programs.”
[source : Analyst: Iran now 'building a plutonium reactor', WND, http://www.wnd.com/2013/11/analyst-iran-now-building-a-plutonium-reactor, 12th November 2013]
Nash was recently criticised for being one of those commentators who frequently appeared in the media to push a pro-war agenda without revealing their industrial and commercial ties, much like WND has done. Here is what Nash had to say about Syria earlier this year:
MARTHA: What do you think should be done? Do you think Congress should vote to approve this strike?
NASH: It depends on what this strike really entails. If this strike is nothing more than poking our nose in there and not changing the game then, no. Because if you take a shot at somebody, you should expect them to take a shot back at you. Therefore, this ought to be part of an overall plan that achieves certain strategic political ends, and if it doesn’t, if all it is is “doing something” then, no, I don’t support that at all. But if it’s to change the events on the ground and we have a plan on what we want that outcome to look like then, yes, I can say support it because the President has already gotten far out in front of the whole process with his rhetoric, and now the United States and our reputation abroad is really swinging in the balance.
[source : Conflicts of interest in the Syria debate, Public Accountability Initiative, http://public-accountability.org/2013/10/conflicts-of-interest-in-the-syria-debate/, 11th October 2013]
So pro-war on Syria Nash, who works for PNAC mobster Gaffney, is cited in a WND article praising Netanyahu and Israel, but the article omits any mention of Nash's current links or hunger to illegally install al Qaeda as de facto rulers of Syria.
Hmm. Is that journalism? Or propaganda?
Monday, November 11, 2013
A MAJOR SHOCK
Former Prime Minister Sir John Major has expressed his shock at the dominance of the ruling class in public life.
Is this the same John Major who is a member of The Trilateral Commission, run by David Rockefeller, who is the most senior member of the ruling class, controlling the USA through The Council on Foreign Relations, Europe through Bilderberg, and Asia through The Trilateral Commission, and who sponsored the Nazis in a variety of ways?
Is this the same John Major who led us into Europe through The Maastricht Treaty, a long term plan of Rockefeller-run Bilderberg, and the reason why Thatcher was booted out to make way for Major?
Sir John Major has expressed his shock at the way in which every sphere of modern public life is dominated by a private school-educated elite and well-heeled middle class.
...Major – who went to a grammar school in south London and left with three O-levels – said: "In every single sphere of British influence, the upper echelons of power in 2013 are held overwhelmingly by the privately educated or the affluent middle class. To me from my background, I find that truly shocking."
[source : John Major 'shocked' at privately educated elite's hold on power, The Guardian, http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2013/nov/11/john-major-shocked-elite-social-mobility, 11th November 2013]
Is this the same John Major who is a member of The Trilateral Commission, run by David Rockefeller, who is the most senior member of the ruling class, controlling the USA through The Council on Foreign Relations, Europe through Bilderberg, and Asia through The Trilateral Commission, and who sponsored the Nazis in a variety of ways?
Is this the same John Major who led us into Europe through The Maastricht Treaty, a long term plan of Rockefeller-run Bilderberg, and the reason why Thatcher was booted out to make way for Major?
WORLD WAR ONE WAS A CONSPIRACY SEEMS TO BE A FAVOURITE
The blog "World War One Was A Conspiracy" from October last year is currently the most popular post of this blog. Not of all time; that is "What Does NATO Stand For?". Thanks to all who have read and/or searched for that to give it a good rank in searches.
NAME THAT CELEBRITY
Welcome to the new TV show Name That Celebrity, where the first contestant to name that celebrity from a list of clues wins points; the more clues needed, the less points accrued. The contestant with the most points at the end of the show wins a prize, which tonight will be one of the following:
1. the latest mobile phone with all the latest spying software, middleware, firmware, hardware, and whatever other ware for the NSA and GCHQ to spy on you while you go about your daily life
2. an all expenses paid trip to Gaza, to see first hand the racism and brutality of the Israeli occupation
3. shadow a brigade of cutthroat rebels in Syria for a day as they enjoy being used as a proxy terrorist force for Israel
4. a cuddly toy
5. a simulation of the assassination of President John F Kennedy to understand how it was impossible that Lee Harvey Oswald killed Kennedy
And so, on to our first celebrity:
Clue 1 : I am an author, actor and comedian
Clue 2 : I am openly gay
Clue 3 : I campaign against Russia, and I don't get attacked in the media.
(Buzz from contestant Frank) Frank : Stephen Fry?
Now, onto our second celebrity:
Clue 1 : I too am an author, actor and comedian
Clue 2 : I am not gay (but have had one homosexual encounter, and that was for a TV show) and have had a long, long list of girlfriends and have been married for a brief period
Clue 3 : I call for revolution, and do get attacked in the media.
(Buzz from contestant Mary) : Russell Brand!
So, for 10 bonus points, can either of you explain to the audience why one gets slaughtered in the media and one doesn't?
Mary: Ermmmmmmmmmmmm...
Frank : Now, that's a toughie...
Member of the audience (possibly me) shouts out : Coz Fry attacked Russia while Brand called for revolution, you pillocks!
1. the latest mobile phone with all the latest spying software, middleware, firmware, hardware, and whatever other ware for the NSA and GCHQ to spy on you while you go about your daily life
2. an all expenses paid trip to Gaza, to see first hand the racism and brutality of the Israeli occupation
3. shadow a brigade of cutthroat rebels in Syria for a day as they enjoy being used as a proxy terrorist force for Israel
4. a cuddly toy
5. a simulation of the assassination of President John F Kennedy to understand how it was impossible that Lee Harvey Oswald killed Kennedy
And so, on to our first celebrity:
Clue 1 : I am an author, actor and comedian
Clue 2 : I am openly gay
Clue 3 : I campaign against Russia, and I don't get attacked in the media.
(Buzz from contestant Frank) Frank : Stephen Fry?
Now, onto our second celebrity:
Clue 1 : I too am an author, actor and comedian
Clue 2 : I am not gay (but have had one homosexual encounter, and that was for a TV show) and have had a long, long list of girlfriends and have been married for a brief period
Clue 3 : I call for revolution, and do get attacked in the media.
(Buzz from contestant Mary) : Russell Brand!
So, for 10 bonus points, can either of you explain to the audience why one gets slaughtered in the media and one doesn't?
Mary: Ermmmmmmmmmmmm...
Frank : Now, that's a toughie...
Member of the audience (possibly me) shouts out : Coz Fry attacked Russia while Brand called for revolution, you pillocks!
ART
Whenever I hear or read the word art I think of Monet, Goya, Chopin, Shostakovich, Puccini, Owen. Some might call this high art. If this is high art, then what is low art?
For low art we need look no further than Miley Cyrus, who at the recent MTV awards in Amsterdam groped a latex-clad dwarf, and apparently lit up a joint live on stage. Sadly, she also won the Best Video category for her single Wrecking Ball. All that the video featured was Cyrus virtually naked swinging backing and forth on a wrecking ball and doing some rather strange things with a sledgehammer...and that's about it.
Is it arty enough to be even called low art?
She is featured in The Daily Mail, The Daily Mirror, The Guardian and The Independent.
From sweet Hannah Montana to dwarf-groping joint-smoking twerker.
Is a violation of the Trade Description Act to call her an artist? But what's sadder is that young people actually seem to like her. All she does is push sex and drugs.
For low art we need look no further than Miley Cyrus, who at the recent MTV awards in Amsterdam groped a latex-clad dwarf, and apparently lit up a joint live on stage. Sadly, she also won the Best Video category for her single Wrecking Ball. All that the video featured was Cyrus virtually naked swinging backing and forth on a wrecking ball and doing some rather strange things with a sledgehammer...and that's about it.
Is it arty enough to be even called low art?
She is featured in The Daily Mail, The Daily Mirror, The Guardian and The Independent.
From sweet Hannah Montana to dwarf-groping joint-smoking twerker.
Is a violation of the Trade Description Act to call her an artist? But what's sadder is that young people actually seem to like her. All she does is push sex and drugs.
Sunday, November 10, 2013
WHAT WAS ZAC GOLDSMITH DOING ON THE KEISER REPORT?
Zac Goldmsith MP recently married into the Rothschild banking family, and by the Rothschild banking family I mean THE Rothschild banking family. His wife is a direct descendant of the Nathan Mayer Rothschild who was sent to London and made the Rothschild fortune by financing Wellington, and pretending that Wellington had lost at Waterloo when he knew that in fact Wellington had won. This scam caused a mini crash on the London Stock Market and Rothschild's agents bought up the devalued stocks at bargain basement prices. Rothschild's bank NM Rothschild was THE bank for gold bullion in London, and still rules OK.
The interview of Goldsmith by Keiser is at http://rt.com/shows/keiser-report/episode-521-max-keiser-378/
And what a friendly interview it was.
They had a good gab about a number of topics; green issues, democracy (or lack thereof).
And one Russell Brand!
Poor Russell. His potential brother-in-law really had it in for him. And Keiser can only get Brand on The Keiser Report to allow him to respond.
Just what Goldsmith, or indeed Keiser, intended to get out of the show, I don't know. Who approached whom? Was he expecting to get slaughtered by Keiser? Or was it arranged that the two will henceforth be on each other's christmas card list?
It was a very friendly slap-on-the-back interview by one, who I assume wishes the total destruction of THE Rothschild banking family, of the other, who just married into THE Rothschild banking family.
Hmm.
So if anyone who lives in Goldsmith's constituency can get onto him and ask him what he expected to get out of the show and why, then do so. He seemed to push the idea of more contact between MPs and their constituents, and I think by law he must respond, but only to his constituents.
The interview of Goldsmith by Keiser is at http://rt.com/shows/keiser-report/episode-521-max-keiser-378/
And what a friendly interview it was.
They had a good gab about a number of topics; green issues, democracy (or lack thereof).
And one Russell Brand!
Poor Russell. His potential brother-in-law really had it in for him. And Keiser can only get Brand on The Keiser Report to allow him to respond.
Just what Goldsmith, or indeed Keiser, intended to get out of the show, I don't know. Who approached whom? Was he expecting to get slaughtered by Keiser? Or was it arranged that the two will henceforth be on each other's christmas card list?
It was a very friendly slap-on-the-back interview by one, who I assume wishes the total destruction of THE Rothschild banking family, of the other, who just married into THE Rothschild banking family.
Hmm.
So if anyone who lives in Goldsmith's constituency can get onto him and ask him what he expected to get out of the show and why, then do so. He seemed to push the idea of more contact between MPs and their constituents, and I think by law he must respond, but only to his constituents.
NOW TARPLEY HAS A GO AT RUSSELL BRAND
In his latest World Crisis Radio, Webster Tarpley has had a surprising go at Russell Brand, accusing Brand of being part of another limited hangout operation, pushing spirituality while saying nothing about JFK or anything else of any political importance.
Readers will know that I have defended Brand against attacks from warmongers like Nick Cohen and privileged establishment hacks like Quentin Letts. Such media personalities had a go at Brand because Brand called for a revolution, not because of the other call not to vote.
Brand has his own unique brand, Brand Brand, that has given him a large following on Twitter, over 7 million, placing him just outside the Top 100 by number of followers. Anyone who takes a look at that list of Twitter accounts should take note of what those people or organisations do or say. Celebrities with approximately the same number of followers of Brand are:
Tom Hanks;
Lindsay Lohan;
Wayne Rooney;
Zac Efron.
How many of these are calling for revolution? None, as far as I can see.
The other limited hangout ops, such as Snowden, were brought to our attention by the establishment. Brand was asked to guest edit The New Statesman, which is edited by his (former?) girlfriend Jemima Khan of the Goldsmith family. Jemima recently produced a video about drone strikes in Pakistan which exposed the horror of such strikes. She is the daughter of Sir James Goldsmith, and the sister of Zac Goldmsith, MP for Richmond Park, who was surprisingly on Max Keiser's show recently. Zac recently married into the Rothschild banking family.
So it is possible, but I doubt (at the moment) that Brand is part of another limited hangout. And if he is, then what is its purpose? I cannot see one. But I may be wrong.
No. At the moment I believe that Brand is different. I believe that he has had a road to Damascus conversion of some kind, but his is genuine. I was disappointed that he said nothing about the war on Syria in August as The Marsten House prepared to vote on WW3...but I assume he was too occupied by his tour.
But 1776 was a revolution.
And regarding The American Revolution, two things have not yet been explained to my satisfaction:
1. why is there an inverted, incomplete, irregular pentagram directly north of, and pointing down into, The White House?
2. Barings are alleged to be at the heart of The Brutish Empire, even at one point running the British East India Company. So why did Barings have such a strong relationship with the President of The Bank of North America and The Bank of The United States, Thomas Willing? Indeed, why was the neutral Willing given that job, considering he was from the notoriously Anglophile Shippen family? And why did Barings assist Nicholas Biddle by giving The Second Bank of The United States huge lines of credit in times of trouble, when denying such huge lines of credit would have destroyed The United States, which The Brutish Empire was supposed to want? Is this why control of the USA and The Second Bank of The United States was handed to the Rothschilds after British agent Andrew Jackson had destroyed the bank?
Readers will know that I have defended Brand against attacks from warmongers like Nick Cohen and privileged establishment hacks like Quentin Letts. Such media personalities had a go at Brand because Brand called for a revolution, not because of the other call not to vote.
Brand has his own unique brand, Brand Brand, that has given him a large following on Twitter, over 7 million, placing him just outside the Top 100 by number of followers. Anyone who takes a look at that list of Twitter accounts should take note of what those people or organisations do or say. Celebrities with approximately the same number of followers of Brand are:
Tom Hanks;
Lindsay Lohan;
Wayne Rooney;
Zac Efron.
How many of these are calling for revolution? None, as far as I can see.
The other limited hangout ops, such as Snowden, were brought to our attention by the establishment. Brand was asked to guest edit The New Statesman, which is edited by his (former?) girlfriend Jemima Khan of the Goldsmith family. Jemima recently produced a video about drone strikes in Pakistan which exposed the horror of such strikes. She is the daughter of Sir James Goldsmith, and the sister of Zac Goldmsith, MP for Richmond Park, who was surprisingly on Max Keiser's show recently. Zac recently married into the Rothschild banking family.
So it is possible, but I doubt (at the moment) that Brand is part of another limited hangout. And if he is, then what is its purpose? I cannot see one. But I may be wrong.
No. At the moment I believe that Brand is different. I believe that he has had a road to Damascus conversion of some kind, but his is genuine. I was disappointed that he said nothing about the war on Syria in August as The Marsten House prepared to vote on WW3...but I assume he was too occupied by his tour.
But 1776 was a revolution.
And regarding The American Revolution, two things have not yet been explained to my satisfaction:
1. why is there an inverted, incomplete, irregular pentagram directly north of, and pointing down into, The White House?
2. Barings are alleged to be at the heart of The Brutish Empire, even at one point running the British East India Company. So why did Barings have such a strong relationship with the President of The Bank of North America and The Bank of The United States, Thomas Willing? Indeed, why was the neutral Willing given that job, considering he was from the notoriously Anglophile Shippen family? And why did Barings assist Nicholas Biddle by giving The Second Bank of The United States huge lines of credit in times of trouble, when denying such huge lines of credit would have destroyed The United States, which The Brutish Empire was supposed to want? Is this why control of the USA and The Second Bank of The United States was handed to the Rothschilds after British agent Andrew Jackson had destroyed the bank?
SUSPECTS IN THE MURDER OF YASSER ARAFAT
1. Santa Claus
2. Elvis
3. Israel
4. KGB
5. Colonel Mustard, with the Polonium 210, in the compound under siege by Israel.
Less than a year before Arafat was murdered, Israel had vowed to murder Arafat.
At the time of his murder, Arafat was under siege in his compound by Israel.
2. Elvis
3. Israel
4. KGB
5. Colonel Mustard, with the Polonium 210, in the compound under siege by Israel.
Less than a year before Arafat was murdered, Israel had vowed to murder Arafat.
At the time of his murder, Arafat was under siege in his compound by Israel.
Saturday, November 09, 2013
HOW CAN YOU TELL WHERE THE FRONT LINE IS?
Give David Cameron a rifle, a uniform, a helmet and a pair of boots, and which ever ways he sprints, the front line is in the opposite direction.
Cameron, Hague, Clegg, Hughes, Ashdown, Rifkind, the bloody lot 'em, prepared and desperate to fire inaccurate missiles from thousands of miles away and supporting cutthroat Jihadis as they slit the throats of Syrian children, while at the same time laying wreathes at The Cenotaph, pretending to know and understand and regret the consequences of war.
Shame!
Shame!
Shame!
Shame!
Shame!
Shame!
Shame!
Shame!
Shame!
Shame!
Shame!
That's what Big Ben will chime at 1100 tomorrow, and Monday, and the day after that, and the day after that,...
Cameron, Hague, Clegg, Hughes, Ashdown, Rifkind, the bloody lot 'em, prepared and desperate to fire inaccurate missiles from thousands of miles away and supporting cutthroat Jihadis as they slit the throats of Syrian children, while at the same time laying wreathes at The Cenotaph, pretending to know and understand and regret the consequences of war.
Shame!
Shame!
Shame!
Shame!
Shame!
Shame!
Shame!
Shame!
Shame!
Shame!
Shame!
That's what Big Ben will chime at 1100 tomorrow, and Monday, and the day after that, and the day after that,...
THE GREAT BRITISH MUG OFF
[The Great British Mug Off is a new TV show, a parody of The Great British Bake Off, in which ordinary members of the public are unwittingly filmed, via secret cameras illegally installed in their homes by proxy criminals for MI5, as they simply get on with their lives while the TV, radio and news channels play in the background, spewing propaganda and lies, lies, lies. However, there is also a running commentary from two 'experts' who make comments about the real truth behind the media lies which will show just how much of a mug each contestant is. Whoever is left sitting in front of the TV without questioning anything is the winner, and is awarded the prize so coveted by the British public, Mug of the Year. Nobody knows if cameras are in their homes so most members of the public assume there are and behave like mugs. The problem is that this show could go on for a very, very, very long time and may not produce one overall winner.]
TV Host (Jane) : Welcome to this week's Great British Mug Off. This week our mugs,..., er, contestants will attempt to cope with the daily grind and drudgery of their boring insignificant lives while their leaders (1) pretend to care about the consequences of war, and (2) whinge that leaks from a well known whistleblower are aiding the enemy while they aid that same enemy around the globe, currently in Syria.
Expert #1 (Martin) : Yes, welcome to what should be a cracking show this week, because of course it's Remembrance Sunday this weekend, which just on its own would provide hours of side-splitting laughter for us, the experts, watching our mugs take in all the pomp and bullshit when we know for a fact that all the major wars have all been engineered for the benefit of a handful of families, but in addition the heads of the spying agencies were in front of a committee of MPs just a few days ago. And Dave, you were there, in the room, and from what you were telling me earlier before the show it sounds like it was one of the funniest things you had ever seen. I wish I had been there.
Expert #2 (Dave): Yes. Hello Martin. Hello Jane. But most of all, hello to all our viewers. Yes. It was hilarious. I don't know how the chiefs kept their faces straight as they accused Ed Snowden of aiding the enemy, i.e. al Qaeda, when, as you know, we created al Qaeda, supported them, protected them through a Covenant of Security, and are currently allied with them in Syria, allowing extremist preachers to beg Muslims to go to Syria and fight a Jihad against President Assad providing more meat for the terrorist grinder over there.
Martin : Succinctly put, Dave! And here is our first mugoid, Peter, who loves to watch football, supporting Crystal Palace for his sins (and as far we know there's a lot of them).
Dave : And, Martin, I believe his grandfather fought in North Africa against Rommel.
Jane : Which is why we selected Peter. Well, viewers. Sit back and enjoy Peter as we watch him watching the ceremony at The Cenotaph.
Dave : This is going to be a classic.
Martin : C'mon, Peter. Shout something at the TV!
Dave : He's not saying anything. He's just sitting there, watchi...
Jane : Wooagh. Hang on. Peter is standing up...he's saluting...and he's...Oh, you beauty! Peter is actually singing the national anthem!!
Martin : Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Haaaaagh!
Jane : GO PETER, YOU MUG!
Dave : Peter is actually singing the national anthem! He is actually stood up, saluting the TV, and singing the national anthem! But what Peter doesn't know, just like 99% of the nation, is that the royal family actually engineered World War 1!
Jane : Yes. Dave, explain to our viewers, if you can through your hysterics!
Dave : I'll try. While he was Prince, King Edward VII created a series of treaties, called The Triple Entente, that would encircle Germany in war given the right conditions. And before this he persuaded his nephew Wilhelm, later Kaiser Wilhelm II, to dump Otto von Bismarck because Bismarck was an excellent diplomat and had correctly identified that the US Civil War had been engineered by the British to divide the United States into two, both smaller parts more controllable and reliant on British finance.
Martin : That's right. But old Abe printed his own money, so we whacked him.
Jane : But I thought Germany started World War 1?
Dave : Is there a camera installed in here watching you, Jane?
Martin : Haaa. Nice one, Dave. No, Jane, Germany did not start World War 1. Germany was tricked into invading Belgium. The King of England told Kaiser Wilhelm that Britain would not become involved in any war. This gave Germany the green light to declare war on Russia and then France, and then invade Belgium to take out Paris and neutralise France.
Dave : But as soon as Germany invaded Belgium, Sir Edward Grey, the British Foreign Secretary, demanded that Great Britain enforce an obscure treaty...
Martin : The 1839 Treaty of London...
Dave : Yes, which Britain did not need to enforce unilaterally, and Great Britain declared war on Germany. But, Martin, how did it get to that point?
Martin : Well, ...
Jane : I think I know this bit. Arch Duke Ferdinand had been condemned to death by the Freemasons,...
Dave : Ultimately controlled globally by a member of the British royal family. Peter, by the way, is still saluting, as David Cameron lays a wreathe...
Jane : OK. And Ferdinand also knew that, but he still went to Sarajevo, where he was attacked by a bunch of Freemasons, who at their trial admitted to receiving help and encouragement from Freemasons abroad.
Martin : Correctomundo, Jane. So the sequence of events is?
Jane : OK, bare with me. First, Bismarck was dumped. This allowed Prince Edward to create a series of alliances with Russia and France without Germany doing the same, or they did but it was too late. Then Freemasonry,...
Dave : Controlled by the British royals,...
Jane : Yes,...assassinated Ferdinand. Then the treaties arranged by Edward fell into place,...
Martin : No. Then King George V told Wilhelm that England wouldn't join in any war if there was one. So everyone declared war on everyone else, which then led to the treaties arranged by Edward to fall into place...
Jane : And then Sir Edward Grey demanded that Belgium be defended because of the Treaty of London, but Britain did not need to defend Belgium on its own.
Martin : BINGO!!
Dave : And that is World War 1 in a nutshell. OK Jane. What was the purpose of World War 1?
Jane : For the viewers, Peter has now sat down and is drinking what looks like a bottle of beer.
Dave : It'll probably be Bombardier.
Martin : Or Lancaster Bomber!
Dave : Ha haa.
Jane : The purpose of World War 1 was to create a world government that Britain and its allies, victorious after the war, would control.
Dave : But?
Jane : But America didn't join.
Martin : So?
Jane : So world war 2 was engineered.
Dave : The fucking mugs. What won't they accept? World War 1? They hated it that much that 20 years later they had another one!
Martin : And only a few small protests at bailing out the banks? I can't wait for the bail-ins.
Dave : I've got champagne on ice ready for that one, Martin.
Jane : Peter has now opened a second bottle of beer, and put on some music. What is that music, guys?
Dave : I Predict a Riot by Kaiser Chiefs?
Martin : Hahahahaa! No. That's Entertainment by The Jam.
Jane : Well, viewers. That was Peter, our Mugoid of the Week. Certainly a contestant for Mug of the Year, I'm sure you'll agree. You can't be much more of a mug than singing the national anthem as David Cameron lays a wreathe at The Cenotaph on Remembrance Sunday. David. Martin. Thanks as always for your input.
Martin : We'll be out of a job soon if you continue like that. I've had a really good laugh, and look forward to next week.
Dave : Me too. I'm off to raise a glass, and toast our Mugoid of the Week, Peter!
Jane : Cheers! See you next week.
TV Host (Jane) : Welcome to this week's Great British Mug Off. This week our mugs,..., er, contestants will attempt to cope with the daily grind and drudgery of their boring insignificant lives while their leaders (1) pretend to care about the consequences of war, and (2) whinge that leaks from a well known whistleblower are aiding the enemy while they aid that same enemy around the globe, currently in Syria.
Expert #1 (Martin) : Yes, welcome to what should be a cracking show this week, because of course it's Remembrance Sunday this weekend, which just on its own would provide hours of side-splitting laughter for us, the experts, watching our mugs take in all the pomp and bullshit when we know for a fact that all the major wars have all been engineered for the benefit of a handful of families, but in addition the heads of the spying agencies were in front of a committee of MPs just a few days ago. And Dave, you were there, in the room, and from what you were telling me earlier before the show it sounds like it was one of the funniest things you had ever seen. I wish I had been there.
Expert #2 (Dave): Yes. Hello Martin. Hello Jane. But most of all, hello to all our viewers. Yes. It was hilarious. I don't know how the chiefs kept their faces straight as they accused Ed Snowden of aiding the enemy, i.e. al Qaeda, when, as you know, we created al Qaeda, supported them, protected them through a Covenant of Security, and are currently allied with them in Syria, allowing extremist preachers to beg Muslims to go to Syria and fight a Jihad against President Assad providing more meat for the terrorist grinder over there.
Martin : Succinctly put, Dave! And here is our first mugoid, Peter, who loves to watch football, supporting Crystal Palace for his sins (and as far we know there's a lot of them).
Dave : And, Martin, I believe his grandfather fought in North Africa against Rommel.
Jane : Which is why we selected Peter. Well, viewers. Sit back and enjoy Peter as we watch him watching the ceremony at The Cenotaph.
Dave : This is going to be a classic.
Martin : C'mon, Peter. Shout something at the TV!
Dave : He's not saying anything. He's just sitting there, watchi...
Jane : Wooagh. Hang on. Peter is standing up...he's saluting...and he's...Oh, you beauty! Peter is actually singing the national anthem!!
Martin : Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Haaaaagh!
Jane : GO PETER, YOU MUG!
Dave : Peter is actually singing the national anthem! He is actually stood up, saluting the TV, and singing the national anthem! But what Peter doesn't know, just like 99% of the nation, is that the royal family actually engineered World War 1!
Jane : Yes. Dave, explain to our viewers, if you can through your hysterics!
Dave : I'll try. While he was Prince, King Edward VII created a series of treaties, called The Triple Entente, that would encircle Germany in war given the right conditions. And before this he persuaded his nephew Wilhelm, later Kaiser Wilhelm II, to dump Otto von Bismarck because Bismarck was an excellent diplomat and had correctly identified that the US Civil War had been engineered by the British to divide the United States into two, both smaller parts more controllable and reliant on British finance.
Martin : That's right. But old Abe printed his own money, so we whacked him.
Jane : But I thought Germany started World War 1?
Dave : Is there a camera installed in here watching you, Jane?
Martin : Haaa. Nice one, Dave. No, Jane, Germany did not start World War 1. Germany was tricked into invading Belgium. The King of England told Kaiser Wilhelm that Britain would not become involved in any war. This gave Germany the green light to declare war on Russia and then France, and then invade Belgium to take out Paris and neutralise France.
Dave : But as soon as Germany invaded Belgium, Sir Edward Grey, the British Foreign Secretary, demanded that Great Britain enforce an obscure treaty...
Martin : The 1839 Treaty of London...
Dave : Yes, which Britain did not need to enforce unilaterally, and Great Britain declared war on Germany. But, Martin, how did it get to that point?
Martin : Well, ...
Jane : I think I know this bit. Arch Duke Ferdinand had been condemned to death by the Freemasons,...
Dave : Ultimately controlled globally by a member of the British royal family. Peter, by the way, is still saluting, as David Cameron lays a wreathe...
Jane : OK. And Ferdinand also knew that, but he still went to Sarajevo, where he was attacked by a bunch of Freemasons, who at their trial admitted to receiving help and encouragement from Freemasons abroad.
Martin : Correctomundo, Jane. So the sequence of events is?
Jane : OK, bare with me. First, Bismarck was dumped. This allowed Prince Edward to create a series of alliances with Russia and France without Germany doing the same, or they did but it was too late. Then Freemasonry,...
Dave : Controlled by the British royals,...
Jane : Yes,...assassinated Ferdinand. Then the treaties arranged by Edward fell into place,...
Martin : No. Then King George V told Wilhelm that England wouldn't join in any war if there was one. So everyone declared war on everyone else, which then led to the treaties arranged by Edward to fall into place...
Jane : And then Sir Edward Grey demanded that Belgium be defended because of the Treaty of London, but Britain did not need to defend Belgium on its own.
Martin : BINGO!!
Dave : And that is World War 1 in a nutshell. OK Jane. What was the purpose of World War 1?
Jane : For the viewers, Peter has now sat down and is drinking what looks like a bottle of beer.
Dave : It'll probably be Bombardier.
Martin : Or Lancaster Bomber!
Dave : Ha haa.
Jane : The purpose of World War 1 was to create a world government that Britain and its allies, victorious after the war, would control.
Dave : But?
Jane : But America didn't join.
Martin : So?
Jane : So world war 2 was engineered.
Dave : The fucking mugs. What won't they accept? World War 1? They hated it that much that 20 years later they had another one!
Martin : And only a few small protests at bailing out the banks? I can't wait for the bail-ins.
Dave : I've got champagne on ice ready for that one, Martin.
Jane : Peter has now opened a second bottle of beer, and put on some music. What is that music, guys?
Dave : I Predict a Riot by Kaiser Chiefs?
Martin : Hahahahaa! No. That's Entertainment by The Jam.
Jane : Well, viewers. That was Peter, our Mugoid of the Week. Certainly a contestant for Mug of the Year, I'm sure you'll agree. You can't be much more of a mug than singing the national anthem as David Cameron lays a wreathe at The Cenotaph on Remembrance Sunday. David. Martin. Thanks as always for your input.
Martin : We'll be out of a job soon if you continue like that. I've had a really good laugh, and look forward to next week.
Dave : Me too. I'm off to raise a glass, and toast our Mugoid of the Week, Peter!
Jane : Cheers! See you next week.
Friday, November 08, 2013
HOW TO MUG OFF THE GREAT BRITISH PUBLIC
Yesterday the heads of GCHQ, MI6 and MI5 expressed their outrage that Ed Snowden was assisting al Qaeda with his 'leaks'.
Yet their organisations created, run, employ and protect al Qaeda!
And why only now are they beginning to express this alleged fury in public? It was OK back in June, July, August, etc when pressure was being applied on Obama to bomb Syria? But now that the information is revealing a bit too much of the national security police state we live in, it's time to whinge in public about how dangerous Snowden and his leaks are because they assist al Qaeda! Even though we are assisting them in Syria!
YOU COULD NOT MAKE THIS STUFF UP!!
The Three Stooges are mugging us all off. Two of them are Sirs, and the third will get his title as soon as he leaves his current position.
And this just a few days before Cameron and Clegg and the rest of the warmongering scum, who couldn't wait to fire inaccurate missiles into Syria no doubt killing civilians and provoking WW3, put on their grim masks and lay wreathes at The Cenotaph!
Only Ed Miliband can hold his head with some dignity on Sunday, but even he supported war on Libya. And that turned out grrrrrrrrrrrreat!! What with the place in rubble, factions fighting each other, Libyan weapons and Jihadis going to Syria, and al Qaeda flags fluttering high in the North African breeze.
NICE ONE, WARMONGERS!
Now, listen to Harry Patch (RIP), and then grab a rifle, a uniform, a helmet and a pair of boots and fly out to Aleppo asap and have a go at the Syrian Arab Army yourself instead of using cutthroat Jihadis to terrorise the Syrian people by slitting the throats of their children!
AND STOP SPYING ON US!
AND STOP TREATING US LIKE WE ARE FUCKING GRADE A MORONS!
Yet their organisations created, run, employ and protect al Qaeda!
And why only now are they beginning to express this alleged fury in public? It was OK back in June, July, August, etc when pressure was being applied on Obama to bomb Syria? But now that the information is revealing a bit too much of the national security police state we live in, it's time to whinge in public about how dangerous Snowden and his leaks are because they assist al Qaeda! Even though we are assisting them in Syria!
YOU COULD NOT MAKE THIS STUFF UP!!
The Three Stooges are mugging us all off. Two of them are Sirs, and the third will get his title as soon as he leaves his current position.
And this just a few days before Cameron and Clegg and the rest of the warmongering scum, who couldn't wait to fire inaccurate missiles into Syria no doubt killing civilians and provoking WW3, put on their grim masks and lay wreathes at The Cenotaph!
Only Ed Miliband can hold his head with some dignity on Sunday, but even he supported war on Libya. And that turned out grrrrrrrrrrrreat!! What with the place in rubble, factions fighting each other, Libyan weapons and Jihadis going to Syria, and al Qaeda flags fluttering high in the North African breeze.
NICE ONE, WARMONGERS!
Now, listen to Harry Patch (RIP), and then grab a rifle, a uniform, a helmet and a pair of boots and fly out to Aleppo asap and have a go at the Syrian Arab Army yourself instead of using cutthroat Jihadis to terrorise the Syrian people by slitting the throats of their children!
AND STOP SPYING ON US!
AND STOP TREATING US LIKE WE ARE FUCKING GRADE A MORONS!
THE COVENANT OF SECURITY (OR HOW DID THEY KEEP A STRAIGHT FACE)
Yesterday the heads of MI5, MI6 and GCHQ were questioned about their level of spying by a committee of MPs. At least, that is what was supposed to happen. Instead, the three became The Three Stooges, struggling to keep their faces straight as they conned MPs and the muggins British taxpayer.
There appears to be a massive security threat against this DFQ. That threat is called al Qaeda. But Robin Cook revealed that al Qaeda was just a database of names. Al Qaeda was created by MI6 and CIA during the drive to oust Soviet Russia out of Afghanistan. It was run by Osama bin Laden, who was able to live openly in London, in a mansion in Wembley, while he plotted and schemed his terrorism. During the 1990s there was a Covenant of Security between MI5 and the Islamic extremists in which the Islamic extremists could live in London safe from prosecution by anyone. Also during the 1990s there were several opportunities to either arrest or kill bin Laden, but each opportunity was refused. Finsbury Park Mosque was infiltrated by Reda Hassaine for MI5. He was giving them top grade information on violent activities, but MI5 betrayed him rather than act on his information. The most famous 'attack' of al Qaeda was 9/11, but there is ample evidence that 9/11 was an inside job, at the very least allowed to happen but most likely made to happen, with Saudi Arabia supplying the patsies and Israeli agents arranging for the US military to go AWOL. The wars since 9/11 have benefited Israel. Bin Laden died of Marfan Syndrome in late 2001/early 2002, but nobody bothered to tell us, because that would spoil all the fun of us being terrorised.
One of the wars that has benefited Israel has been that in Syria. The cutthroat Jihadis currently beheading their way through Syria were inserted by the DFQ under an agreement reached between the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia that the latter would supply them. To provide British Jihadis for this terrorist factory, extremist preachers were allowed to preach Jihad on the streets of London, begging Muslims to go to Syria to join the Jihad against President Assad. One such preacher was Michael Adebalajo, who went on to butcher a British soldier called Lee Rigby and brag about it on film immediately after it happened.
This is the true background to The Three Stooges, who struggled to keep their faces straight yesterday.
They created al Qaeda and have used al Qaeda to terrorise not only the world, but us, the muggins British taxpayer, who pays their wages, into ceding our privacy rights.
How did they keep their faces straight?
There appears to be a massive security threat against this DFQ. That threat is called al Qaeda. But Robin Cook revealed that al Qaeda was just a database of names. Al Qaeda was created by MI6 and CIA during the drive to oust Soviet Russia out of Afghanistan. It was run by Osama bin Laden, who was able to live openly in London, in a mansion in Wembley, while he plotted and schemed his terrorism. During the 1990s there was a Covenant of Security between MI5 and the Islamic extremists in which the Islamic extremists could live in London safe from prosecution by anyone. Also during the 1990s there were several opportunities to either arrest or kill bin Laden, but each opportunity was refused. Finsbury Park Mosque was infiltrated by Reda Hassaine for MI5. He was giving them top grade information on violent activities, but MI5 betrayed him rather than act on his information. The most famous 'attack' of al Qaeda was 9/11, but there is ample evidence that 9/11 was an inside job, at the very least allowed to happen but most likely made to happen, with Saudi Arabia supplying the patsies and Israeli agents arranging for the US military to go AWOL. The wars since 9/11 have benefited Israel. Bin Laden died of Marfan Syndrome in late 2001/early 2002, but nobody bothered to tell us, because that would spoil all the fun of us being terrorised.
One of the wars that has benefited Israel has been that in Syria. The cutthroat Jihadis currently beheading their way through Syria were inserted by the DFQ under an agreement reached between the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia that the latter would supply them. To provide British Jihadis for this terrorist factory, extremist preachers were allowed to preach Jihad on the streets of London, begging Muslims to go to Syria to join the Jihad against President Assad. One such preacher was Michael Adebalajo, who went on to butcher a British soldier called Lee Rigby and brag about it on film immediately after it happened.
This is the true background to The Three Stooges, who struggled to keep their faces straight yesterday.
They created al Qaeda and have used al Qaeda to terrorise not only the world, but us, the muggins British taxpayer, who pays their wages, into ceding our privacy rights.
How did they keep their faces straight?
WORLD NET DAILY REVEALS ITSELF IN FULL ZIONIST INGLORIOUSNESS
I have been watching World Net Daily for a few months now. Some of its reporters/contributors are good. Others are not.
I have noticed that WND very rarely, if ever, criticises Israel. One of its reporters, Aaron Klein, poses as someone who has a pipeline directly into the heart of an unnamed intelligence agency, usually quoting anonymous sources who usually have something bad to say about Israel's enemies, particularly Iran. So we can take an educated guess as to which agency that is.
Last week I was going to write something about WND because a report it had issued was so blatantly pro-Israel that it seemed to be part of some kind of charm offensive. That report focused on the help that one Israeli charity, i.e. not the Israeli government, was helping victims of the violence in Syria. But WND has yet to report that it was Israel, with Saudi Arabia, who did 9/11 to kick off a series of wars that was planned by Israel in the 1990s, one of which was on Syria. Neither has WND reported on The Redirection brought to our attention by Seymour Hersh, in which the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia agreed that the latter would unleash cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria and Iran.
But back to the charm offensive. The following day that the Israeli charity report was published by WND, Israel attacked Syria.
I thought this was a joke. But today WND has gone beyond, way beyond, the joke.
Today, in an 'exclusive', WND is reporting that the KGB murdered Arafat!! This is based on the unproven allegation, made by Great Britain, that Russia murdered Alexander Litvinenko with Polonium 210 in 2006.
Even the spider in my bathroom knows that Israel played a hand in 9/11. Israel has been the beneficiary of all the wars in The Middle East since 9/11, and years before 9/11 Israel had issued a plan, called A Clean Break, which named the countries and organisations that have been attacked since 9/11. But the spider in my bathroom also knows that Israel murdered Arafat.
There was a nuclear smuggling ring in London. Russia knew about it and was investigating it. Russia told the British about it, who replied that they knew. In other words, the British allowed a nuclear smuggling ring to operate in London. There were reports that Litvinenko had suspicious solid objects up his arse as he lay pointing his radioactive finger at Putin, reports which were quickly buried. And at every opportunity to reveal their 'evidence', the British have refused to do so, even when doing so, this summer, would have embarrassed Putin and probably led him to abandon his support for President Assad of Syria, which the horrific false flag chemical attack in Ghouta on 21st August, which as organised by The Prince of Jihad Bandar bin Sultan, was supposed to do!
The WND report is also based on the allegations of a former Romananian spy chief who defected to the USA in 1978. So his works since won't be biased and not serve anybody's agenda then, eh?
I have noticed that WND very rarely, if ever, criticises Israel. One of its reporters, Aaron Klein, poses as someone who has a pipeline directly into the heart of an unnamed intelligence agency, usually quoting anonymous sources who usually have something bad to say about Israel's enemies, particularly Iran. So we can take an educated guess as to which agency that is.
Last week I was going to write something about WND because a report it had issued was so blatantly pro-Israel that it seemed to be part of some kind of charm offensive. That report focused on the help that one Israeli charity, i.e. not the Israeli government, was helping victims of the violence in Syria. But WND has yet to report that it was Israel, with Saudi Arabia, who did 9/11 to kick off a series of wars that was planned by Israel in the 1990s, one of which was on Syria. Neither has WND reported on The Redirection brought to our attention by Seymour Hersh, in which the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia agreed that the latter would unleash cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria and Iran.
But back to the charm offensive. The following day that the Israeli charity report was published by WND, Israel attacked Syria.
I thought this was a joke. But today WND has gone beyond, way beyond, the joke.
Today, in an 'exclusive', WND is reporting that the KGB murdered Arafat!! This is based on the unproven allegation, made by Great Britain, that Russia murdered Alexander Litvinenko with Polonium 210 in 2006.
Even the spider in my bathroom knows that Israel played a hand in 9/11. Israel has been the beneficiary of all the wars in The Middle East since 9/11, and years before 9/11 Israel had issued a plan, called A Clean Break, which named the countries and organisations that have been attacked since 9/11. But the spider in my bathroom also knows that Israel murdered Arafat.
There was a nuclear smuggling ring in London. Russia knew about it and was investigating it. Russia told the British about it, who replied that they knew. In other words, the British allowed a nuclear smuggling ring to operate in London. There were reports that Litvinenko had suspicious solid objects up his arse as he lay pointing his radioactive finger at Putin, reports which were quickly buried. And at every opportunity to reveal their 'evidence', the British have refused to do so, even when doing so, this summer, would have embarrassed Putin and probably led him to abandon his support for President Assad of Syria, which the horrific false flag chemical attack in Ghouta on 21st August, which as organised by The Prince of Jihad Bandar bin Sultan, was supposed to do!
The WND report is also based on the allegations of a former Romananian spy chief who defected to the USA in 1978. So his works since won't be biased and not serve anybody's agenda then, eh?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)