Friday, June 01, 2007

WHY DON'T I BELIEVE 100% THE "RUSSIA DID IT" LINE?

Just 16 months before Litvinenko was done in by whomever, London was bombed.

Allegedly four "clean skins" managed to brew some homemade explosive and blow up three trains and a bus only a stone's throw away from The City of London. The City of London is one of, if not the, prime financial centres in the world which allows the Illuminati to create virtually unlimited amounts of money for their Dr Evil plan to rule the world, so it is vital that such centres are protected.

Yet somehow, just over a year later, arguably one of the prize assets of British Intelligence was murdered on their turf after someone allegedly smuggled radioactive material into London on board a British Airways plane from Moscow?

How can they be THAT incompetent.

Asking us to believe they didn't know anything about 7/7 is stretching it a bit.

But Polonium-210 all the way from Moscow on a BA flight, with all those terrorist threats and talk of dirty bombs?

Surely after Litvinenko's outrageous claims that Putin was behind 9/11 and was a paedophile they should have guessed he was a target of the Kremlin? Not so, apparently.

What has happened in other European capital cities?
Paris?
Rome?
Berlin?
Vienna?
Copenhagen?
Stockholm?
Prague?
Brussels?
Amsterdam?
Athens?
Madrid?

Madrid was bombed in 2004 (the bombers were controlled by Spanish police), but besides that, not much.

How can our intelligence services be so incompetent, tasked with protecting The City of London, the controller of America via its ownership of The Federal Reserve?

This is why I don't fully believe Russia did it.

I have some faith in British Intelligence. Not much, but some. To ask us to believe they didn't know anything about 7/7 or Litvinenko is really asking something, particularly at this time in history when we are pushing for WW3 in the Middle East and Russia is kicking our Queen via Shell and BP out of their oil and gas fields.

I can believe that some within Russian exile/MI6 circles did not shed a tear at Litvinenko's death, particularly the manner of his death. It was a very photogenic death. It's how much influence such people could have exercised to stop any assassination attempt.

What also disturbs me, is how aware of the history of British influence on Russian affairs are the Russian exiles? Surely they know the British elite would drop any links to them immediately if the necessity arose? The British introduced Lenin and Trotsky with their Red Terror into Russia, which ultimately lead to Rothschild agent Stalin and the City of London/Wall Street-engineered World War 2. All that bloodshed was engineered out of London and exercised with the help of their gimp, The United States of America through the City of London''s control of The Federal Reserve.

I guess what I'm suggesting is this; London is not safe, not even for the Devil's own.

No comments: