Since last weekend the NATO media has been covering the Houla massacre as if their lives depended on it (and I'll bet in some cases it really did). They found witnesses. They reported their accounts. Luckily for the NATO media all these witnesses gave accounts that fitted perfectly the narrative that the NATO media wanted; local milita did it with the complicity of the Syrian army.
To them it was case closed; Assad did it.
The NATO media demanded more slaughter, more war, more destruction.
Never mind that these witness reports were incoherent.
Never mind that the general narrative they created was not credible.
Never mind that the UN are getting their reports just from the FSA.
WAR! WAR! WAR! shouts the NATO media.
But now witnesses are being found that can provide accounts of the slaughter that agree with the Syrian government's narrative and are more coherent and credible, the NATO media has moved on.
Talk to the knee coz' the elbow don't wanna hear it.
Did my grandfathers fight in WW2 for this?
No comments:
Post a Comment