Pearl Harbor, riddled with NWO symbolism from the very beginning to the very end, reminded the unwitting American public of that 'unprovoked' and dastardly attack (that was allowed to happen) on Pearl Harbor on 7th December 1941. The film was released claiming to have spent millions and millions on making sure the film was historically accurate, but it was money well wasted. The film was however very emotional, perhaps due to the spectacular visual effects and powerful music and sound. The film was exactly what the NWO wanted just in time for the "new Pearl Harbor" of the inside job 9/11 which was proposed in Rebuilding America's Defenses written by The Project for a New American Century in 2000. The inside job 9/11 gave the NWO the support from the chemically-lobotomised American public to go on a global warmongering rampage and to implement a police state at home, such that today the USA is virtually encamped in The Caspian and surrounded Iran, and is flying drones in not only Africa and the Middle East but also the skies of America.
Argo not only stars Affleck as the CIA agent who rescues 6 members of staff of the American Embassy in Iran, but is also directed by Affleck. Curiously, despite winning best picture at the Oscars Affleck's direction was not nominated but the script was, and won. So what is it about the script? IT IS ANTI-IRAN AND HISTORICALLY INACCURATE! Not only that, it is cheap, desperately seeking humour with the sad catchphrase "Argo fuck yourself". Honestly, the film is an embarrassment to the human race. Affleck's direction is in my opinion much better than the story/script and deserves some credit.
In the week before the Oscars and after the Oscars I heard several Hollywooders say that Affleck was "a nice guy". He may well be. I seriously doubt that Affleck is a bloodthirsty warmonger with enough clout to get Pearl Harbor and Argo made the way they were. But I can believe that his agent and/or advisers could be using his "nice guy" image to sell war. And I can believe that they are compromised in some way by someone.
And to add to the curiosity, there is a scene in Argo in which the US government officially allows Hollywood to make fake films! So may be Affleck does know more than I suspect...
...In a radio interview Tuesday on the Kevin Barrett Show, Honegger stated that filmmaker Ben Affleck might one day be hanged for war crimes and treason - not only for Argo, which she said is designed to pave the road to war on Iran, but also for his role in the 2001 film Pearl Harbor, an earlier intelligence operation designed to pave the road to the 9/11 “New Pearl Harbor.” According to Honegger, Affleck - like his character in Argo - appears to be a covert operator posing as a filmmaker.
At the 2001 Golden Raspberry Awards, Pearl Harbor was nominated for six awards: Worst Picture, Worst Director, Worst Actor (Ben Affleck), Worst Screenplay, Worst Screen Couple, and Worst Remake or Sequel. This pathetic excuse for a movie cost over USD150 million. Whoever invested that USD150 million was not interested in making money - or even making a movie. Pearl Harbor had only one purpose: To spread the “Pearl Harbor” meme in the public mind in preparation for 9/11. In a sense, Pearl Harbor was like Argo's fictional science fiction film-within-a-film: It was a fake movie, but a real intelligence operation.
Donald Rumsfeld, like Affleck and the makers of Pearl Harbor, spent 2000 and 2001 hyping the “Pearl Harbor” meme in preparation for 9/11. According to Swiss researcher TH Meyer, Rumsfeld gave away hundreds if not thousands of copies of Roberta Wohlstetter’s book Pearl Harbor, ‘Warning and Decision.’ (Roberta Wohlstetter was the wife of neocon godfather and rabid Zionist Albert Wohlstetter, Paul Wolfowitz's mentor, named in his obiturary “The world’s most influential unknown figure of the past half-century.”)
[source : Argo, CIA's covert black ops, Press TV, http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/03/13/293328/argo-cias-covert-black-ops/, 13th March 2013]
No comments:
Post a Comment