But first, we need more world leaders like Putin. The one and true Axis of Evil, consisting of the USA, DFQ, France, Israel and Saudi Arabia, would by now have dragged us into world war had it not been for Ed Miliband, who has suffered ad hominem attacks against himself and his leadership from a war-hungry NATO media ever since that welcome vote for caution and restraint in The Marsten House, ooh, two weeks ago now, though it seems more like at least two months because so much has happened since.
Putin is absolutely right: only the rebels stood to gain more from that horrific episode on 21st August; the rebels have form, Russia having proved that the rebels used chemicals at Khan al Assal and then returned to the scene of their crime to murder in cold blood all the civilians and military there so nobody was left alive to testify to the UN; the cutthroats have been arrested with kilograms of Sarin, their tunnels and dens are frequently found to contain barrels and barrels of chemicals (though some may be to produce medical supplies), and they have frequently filmed their experiments with chemicals and their threats to use them.
Putin is also wise to raise the possibility that the rebels may be planning another false flag attack, this time on Israel, to be blamed on Assad.
But the statement I question is this:
No one wants the United Nations to suffer the fate of the League of Nations, which collapsed because it lacked real leverage. This is possible if influential countries bypass the United Nations and take military action without Security Council authorization.
[source : A Plea for Caution From Russia, NYT, http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/12/opinion/putin-plea-for-caution-from-russia-on-syria.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0, 11th September 2013]
The United Nations is a world government in waiting. And now it doesn't have that long to wait.
As I understand it, and correct me if I am wrong, The League of Nations was the first attempt at world government, and was executed by the Round Table group of that thoroughly quintessential English gentleman, Rothschild agent Cecil Rhodes, who developed The Round Table, which was left in the hands of Lord Alfred Milner and the Rothschilds to create a world federation under British control. The League of Nations failed because the USA voted not to join and thus deprived the LON of the necessary finance available from that greatest fraud ever perpetrated on mankind, The Federal Reserve. After Versailles The Council on Foreign Relations was created to influence American politicians into joining a world government. The League of Nations was financed by the Rockefellers.
Because The League of Nations failed a second world war was engineered. Wall Street, that British island of finance, created both Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia, in the hope that these two empires with opposing extreme philosophies would end up fighting each other, which they did. The USA joined the slaughter under highly suspicious circumstances at Pearl Harbour, and after nearly 4 years of fighting and suffering many, many more casualties than during World War 1, the USA was not only ready to join a world government, it also housed it, on the banks of The Hudson River in New York City.
And perhaps not so surprisingly, the resulting world government, the United Nations, was again financed by the Rockefellers.
So, two world wars, both followed by two attempts at world government, and both of those financed by the Rockefellers. See a pattern anyone?
The Rockefellers have since essentially controlled UN policies, particularly environmental and population control policies through Agenda 21.
Putin seems to have a lot of faith in the UN.
But the UN has been unable to control Israel, which instigated the terrorism and the series of wars we have experienced since that mother of all inside Ziojobs, 9/11.
The UN also allowed the barbaric bombing of Libya (after Russia curiously abstained on UN SCR 1973).
The UN is barely involved in the latest discussions between Russia and the USA over Syria's chemical weapons, and its peace envoys and representatives have been unable to stop the 'civil war' in Syria.
The UN was also unable to stop the invasion of Iraq in 2003.
Putin has this to say about global stability:
The United Nations’ founders understood that decisions affecting war and peace should happen only by consensus, and with America’s consent the veto by Security Council permanent members was enshrined in the United Nations Charter. The profound wisdom of this has underpinned the stability of international relations for decades.
The UN has been a tool of population control and is imposing other kinds of global control, while doing very little to protect the persecuted people of Gaza and merely registering its concern at wars like the illegal invasion of Iraq in 2003.
No comments:
Post a Comment