WHO CAN BE TRUSTED THE MOST : BANKERS OR OSTRACISERS?

I am not sure what the answer that question is. Bankers? Ostracisers? Hmm. It's a toughie.

But remember the bankers? A few years ago the banks done us all like a kipper. They begged for bailouts and in return promised change.

But what do we get?

The head of the International Monetary Fund has warned that a persistent violation of ethics among bankers and rising inequality pose a major threat to growth and financial stability.

Christine Lagarde told an audience in London that six years on from the deep financial crisis that engulfed the global economy, banks were resisting reform and still too focused on excessive risk taking to secure their bonuses at the expense of public trust.

She said: "The behaviour of the financial sector has not changed fundamentally in a number of dimensions since the crisis. While some changes in behaviour are taking place, these are not deep or broad enough. The industry still prizes short-term profit over long-term prudence, today's bonus over tomorrow's relationship.

"Some prominent firms have even been mired in scandals that violate the most basic ethical norms - Libor and foreign exchange rigging, money laundering, illegal foreclosure."

[source : IMF chief says banks haven't changed since financial crisis, The ZioGuardian, http://www.theguardian.com/business/2014/may/27/imf-chief-lagarde-bankers-ethics-risks, 27th May 2014]

A leopard never changes its spots.

A banker never changes.

THEY CANNOT BE TRUSTED WITH THE POWER TO CREATE MONEY OUT OF THIN AIR!!

Such God-like power should only be in the hands of a government body run for the general welfare of the people, not in the dirty, sweaty, bloody hands of a cabal of megalomaniac satanist weirdo freaks.

We don't need bankers. They need us.

F**K M!

ps quote : "today's bonus over tomorrow's relationship". They cannot be trusted.