DAMASCUS, (SANA) – The Ministry of Information stressed on Tuesday that the terrorist attack against al-Ikhbaria channel by armed terrorist groups is an attempt to stop national media from conveying the truth of events to the public opinion.[source : Information Ministry: Terrorist Attack against al-Ikhbaria Channel in al-Haffeh Aimed at Stopping National Media from Conveying Facts to Public Opinion, SANA, http://www.sana.sy/eng/21/2012/06/13/424899.htm, 13/06/2012]
The Ministry added in a statement that the Syrian TV channels which are relating the reality of terrorism targeting the Syrian people with all its spectrums and components have become the target of terrorists on the ground.
The Ministry expressed best wishes for al-Ikhbaria channel's cameraman and reporter in Lattakia to recover quickly, stressing that the bullets of terrorism will only boost the determination of journalists to carry out their mission which is conveying the facts objectively and responsibly to the public opinion.
F.Allafi/al-Ibrahim
Wednesday, June 13, 2012
TERRORISTS IN HAFFA ATTACKED A MEDIA ORGANISATION
SANA is reporting that the terrorist attacks in Haffa were on a media organisation called al-Ikhbaria. I wonder if this is related to the proposed attempted coup later this week?
ISRAEL HAS APACHE HELICOPTERS FROM THE USA AND USES THEM IN GAZA
Lillary Clinton continues the Russia-bashing, accusing Russia of sending helicopters to Syria, but has apparently forgotten that Israel has Apache helicopters from the USA and frequently uses them in Gaza, killing and injuring children in Gaza.
But there is a massive difference between Syria and Gaza.
Syria is being covertly invaded by throat-cutting, head-chopping vicious Sunni terrorists who are being assisted by the SF of USA, UK, France, Israel, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and Turkey, and Assad is fighting this terrorist invasion. Gaza is neither independent from Israel nor Israeli land, and Israel uses this greyness in whatever situation it wants, claiming Gaza is independent when it suits Israel and claiming Gaza is Israeli when it suits Israel.
At a discussion with Israeli President Shimon Peres at the Saban Center for Middle East Policy at The Brookings Institution, Lillary said,
But she also said
Again, why is the onus being placed on Assad? Annan calls on all sides to stop the violence, not just Assad, yet here is Lillary once again putting all the responsibility on Assad.
But only a few weeks ago TheBilderberg Washington Post reported that the Syrian al Qaeda rebs were getting more and better arms with assistance from the USA!
HOW CAN THAT BE SUPPORTING THE ANNAN PEACE PLAN?
And with that kind of information in the public domain is Assad supposed to just allow the terrorists to commit Houla after Houla after Houla?
THERE IS NO QUESTION : SYRIA IS BEING COVERTLY INVADED!
And it is all part of a plan for war on seven nations in five years revealed to General Wesley Clark shortly after the inside job 9/11 that enabled the plan and was covered up.
At the same discussion, Peres said,
This comical hypocrisy comes just as an unnamed Western diplomat confirms what we know already, that Qatar and Saudi Arabia have been arming the Syrian al Qaeda rebs through Turkey.
But there is a massive difference between Syria and Gaza.
Syria is being covertly invaded by throat-cutting, head-chopping vicious Sunni terrorists who are being assisted by the SF of USA, UK, France, Israel, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and Turkey, and Assad is fighting this terrorist invasion. Gaza is neither independent from Israel nor Israeli land, and Israel uses this greyness in whatever situation it wants, claiming Gaza is independent when it suits Israel and claiming Gaza is Israeli when it suits Israel.
At a discussion with Israeli President Shimon Peres at the Saban Center for Middle East Policy at The Brookings Institution, Lillary said,
We have confronted the Russians about stopping their continued arms shipments to Syria. They have, from time to time, said that we shouldn’t worry; everything they’re shipping is unrelated to their actions internally. That’s patently untrue. And we are concerned about the latest information we have that there are attack helicopters on the way from Russia to Syria, which will escalate the conflict quite dramatically.[source : Joint Discussion with Israeli President Shimon Peres Hosted by the Brookings Institution, US State Dept, http://www.state.gov/secretary/rm/2012/06/192200.htm, 12/06/2012]
But she also said
Certainly what happens to Syria matters greatly to the United States, but it matters drastically to Israel. And how we work through the many difficulties that are posed by this unrelenting, brutal crackdown carried out by the Assad regime and their military loyalists will have far-reaching consequences for the region and beyond.
Let me just make three quick points. First, we continue to support Kofi Annan’s efforts, and we do so because he represents both the United Nations and the Arab League.
...And the six-point plan that former Secretary General Annan laid out is a good plan. Of course, it’s not being implemented. And of course, the contempt and rejection of the first principle of that plan, namely the cessation of violence by the Assad regime, has certainly been a grave assault not only on the lives of the Syrian people but on the international effort intended to bring an end to this ongoing conflict.
Again, why is the onus being placed on Assad? Annan calls on all sides to stop the violence, not just Assad, yet here is Lillary once again putting all the responsibility on Assad.
But only a few weeks ago The
HOW CAN THAT BE SUPPORTING THE ANNAN PEACE PLAN?
And with that kind of information in the public domain is Assad supposed to just allow the terrorists to commit Houla after Houla after Houla?
THERE IS NO QUESTION : SYRIA IS BEING COVERTLY INVADED!
And it is all part of a plan for war on seven nations in five years revealed to General Wesley Clark shortly after the inside job 9/11 that enabled the plan and was covered up.
At the same discussion, Peres said,
So this is the first time that I really want to express my admiration for an Arab attempt to fight for their own freedom. It’s admirable, and I wish them success.
This comical hypocrisy comes just as an unnamed Western diplomat confirms what we know already, that Qatar and Saudi Arabia have been arming the Syrian al Qaeda rebs through Turkey.
Syrian rebels are being armed by Saudi Arabia and Qatar, The Independent has learnt, in a development that threatens to inflame a regional power struggle provoked by the 15-month-old uprising against the Assad regime.[source : Exclusive: Arab states arm rebels as UN talks of Syrian civil war, The Independent, http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/exclusive-arab-states-arm-rebels-as-un-talks-of-syrian-civil-war-7845026.html, 13/06/2012]
Rebel fighters from the Free Syrian Army (FSA) have received weapons from the two Gulf countries, which were transported into Syria via Turkey with the implicit support of the country's intelligence agency, MIT, according to a Western diplomat in Ankara.
...Yet, the diplomat voiced concerns that, in practice, the weapons have only been delivered to rebels sympathetic to the Syrian Muslim Brotherhood, the dominant group within the SNC. "Only Muslim Brother groups are getting weapons," he said. Activists along the border not affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood said they had not heard of the weapons being delivered until just a few days ago
Tuesday, June 12, 2012
TWO BUS LOADS OF PEOPLE KIDNAPPED NEAR HOMS
SANA is reporting the kidnapping of the passengers from two buses near Homs.
With predictions of massacres flying around, what will happen to these unlucky people? Will they be slaughtered by their kidnappers, the Syrian al Qaeda rebs, and the result filmed and posted on YouTube so Hasty Hague can accuse Assad again?
Homs was one of those locations that Victoria Nuland predicted could be the location of another massacre.
With predictions of massacres flying around, what will happen to these unlucky people? Will they be slaughtered by their kidnappers, the Syrian al Qaeda rebs, and the result filmed and posted on YouTube so Hasty Hague can accuse Assad again?
Homs was one of those locations that Victoria Nuland predicted could be the location of another massacre.
[source : Armed Terrorist Group Kidnaps passengers of two Busses in Homs, Authorities Pursue Remnants of Terrorists in al-Haffah, SANA, http://www.sana.sy/eng/337/2012/06/12/424861.htm, 12/06/2012]
PROVINCES, (SANA)- An armed terrorist group on Tuesday kidnapped the passengers of two busses on al-Qusseir –al-Jousieh road in Homs countryside.
SANA reporter quoted a source at Homs Governorate as saying that the armed group intercepted two busses carrying citizens at al-Salehieh town crossroads and kidnapped them towards al-Jouseih town.
USA PREDICTS LOCATIONS OF MASSACRES. DOES IT KNOW SOMETHING THAT WE DON'T?
The United States has predicted that another Houla-style massacre will occur in Syria and has even mentioned exact locations.[source : US predicts another Houla-style massacre in Syria, PressTV, http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2012/06/12/245732/us-predicts-another-massacre-in-syria/, 12/06/2012]
US State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland said on Monday that the Syrian government “may be organizing another massacre, this time in the village of al-Haffa, in Latakia province, as well as in the towns Deir el-Zour, in Daraa, in Homs, in Hama, and in suburbs of Damascus.”
Ban Ki Moon also seems more concerned than usual about events in Syria, now demanding that UN observers be allowed in to Haffa.
Do he and the USA know something that we don't?
Or is this an attempt to stop the Syrian military destroying the FSA in Haffa so they can live to fight another day?
Why do I ask this? Because in the last week nearly 60 Syrian soldiers have been killed by the Syrian al Qaeda rebs, yet there is no similar plea from Ban Ki Moon to the rebels to stop their killing.
This is yet another indicator that Ban Ki Moon has taken sides and has to go.
So does Annan.
So does Hague.
FAKE COUP D'ETAT BEING PREPARED IN SYRIA
The trustworthy Thierry Meyssan is reporting that a fake coup d'etat in Syria is being prepared to go operational very soon, perhaps even this week.
According to Meyssan satellite feeds will be cut and replaced with pre-filmed 'news' of alleged massacres that are immediately blamed on Assad, alleged mass protests and alleged mass resignations.
Meyssan gives examples of how similar coup's have occured in the past, including that in Venezuela which John Pilger exposes in his The War on Democracy.
I have noticed the public being prepared for this with recent reports in NATO media that the Syrian government is preparing more alleged massacres. But as of this morning 0715 GMT 12th June 2012 the UN observer mission on the ground in Syria has not formally accused Syria of committing the massacres at Houla or Qubair. It is only NATO media and politicians who accused Syria. The UNHRC in Geneva accused Syria for Houla but they took all their evidence from FSA and by phone. If anything significant has occured the position of Hasty Hague has shifted a bit. He now admits the presence of al Qaeda in Syria which he says threatens an escalation of events. What Hasty Hague fails to admit is that al Qaeda is CIA/MI6 and was injected into Syria for that very purpose!
This attempted coup comes at the same time that Russia is preparing to send a significant contingent of Russian military to Syria.
NB the sources for this report are anonymous.
The dubious Debkafile reported that Obama is planning striking Syria.
Is the timing of this with the widely expected collapse of the Euro a coincidence?
===================================
From http://www.voltairenet.org/NATO-preparing-vast-disinformation
NATO preparing vast disinformation campaign
by Thierry Meyssan
Member States of NATO and the GCC are preparing a coup d’état and a sectarian genocide in Syria. If you want to prevent these crimes, you should act now: circulate this article on the Internet and alert your elected officials.
In a few days, perhaps as early as Friday, June 15, at noon, the Syrians wanting to watch their national TV stations will see them replaced on their screens by TV programs created by the CIA. Studio-shot images will show massacres that are blamed on the Syrian Government, people demonstrating, ministers and generals resigning from their posts, President Al-Assad fleeing, the rebels gathering in the big city centers, and a new government installing itself in the presidential palace.
This operation of disinformation, directly managed from Washington by Ben Rhodes, the US deputy national security adviser for strategic communication, aims at demoralizing the Syrians in order to pave the way for a coup d’etat. NATO, discontent about the double veto of Russia and China, will thus succeed in conquering Syria without attacking the country illegally. Whichever judgment you might have formed on the actual events in Syria, a coup d’etat will end all hopes of democratization.
The Arab League has officially asked the satellite operators Arabsat and Nilesat to stop broadcasting Syrian media, either public or private (Syria TV, Al-Ekbariya, Ad-Dounia, Cham TV, etc.) A precedent already exists because the Arab League had managed to censure Libyan TV in order to keep the leaders of the Jamahiriya from communicating with their people. There is no Hertz network in Syria, where TV works exclusively with satellites. The cut, however, will not leave the screens black.
Actually, this public decision is only the tip of the iceberg. According to our information several international meetings were organized during the past week to coordinate the disinformation campaign. The first two were technical meetings, held in Doha (Qatar); the third was a political meeting and took place in Riyad (Saudi Arabia).
The first meeting assembled PSYOP officers, embedded in the satellite TV channels of Al-Arabiya, Al-Jazeera, BBC, CNN, Fox, France 24, Future TV and MTV. It is known that since 1998, the officers of the US Army Psychological Operations Unit (PSYOP) have been incorporated in CNN. Since then this practice has been extended by NATO to other strategic media as well.
They fabricated false information in advance, on the basis of a “story-telling” script devised by Ben Rhodes’s team at the White House. A procedure of reciprocal validation was installed, with each media quoting the lies of the other media to render them plausible for TV spectators. The participants also decided not only to requisition the TV channels of the CIA for Syria and Lebanon (Barada, Future TV, MTV, Orient News, Syria Chaab, Syria Alghad) but also about 40 religious Wahhabi TV channels to call for confessional massacres to the cry of “Christians to Beyrouth, Alawites into the grave!.”
The second meeting was held for engineers and technicians to fabricate fictitious images, mixing one part in an outdoor studio, the other part with computer generated images. During the past weeks, studios in Saudi Arabia have been set up to build replicas of the two presidential palaces in Syria and the main squares of Damascus, Aleppo and Homs. Studios of this type already exist in Doha (Qatar), but they are not sufficient.
The third meeting was held by General James B. Smith, the US ambassador, a representative of the UK, prince Bandar Bin Sultan (whom former U.S. president George Bush named his adopted son so that the U.S. press called him “Bandar Bush”). In this meeting the media actions were coordinated with those of the Free "Syrian" Army, in which prince Bandar’s mercenaries play a decisive role.
The operation had been in the making for several months, but the U.S. National Security Council decided to accelerate the action after the Russian President, Vladimir Putin, notified the White House that he would oppose by all means, even by force, any illegal NATO military intervention in Syria.
The operation has a double intent: the first is to spread false information, the second aims at censuring all possible responses.
The hampering of TV satellites for military purposes is not new. Under pressure from Israel, the USA and the EU blocked Lebanese, Palestinian, Iraqi, Libyan and Iranian TV channels, one after the other. However, no satellite channels from other parts of the world were censured.
The broadcast of false news is also not new, but four significant steps have been taken in the art of propaganda during the last decade.
• In 1994, a pop music station named “Free Radio of the Thousand Hills” (RTML) gave the signal for genocide in Rwanda with the cry, “Kill the cockroaches!”
• In 2001, NATO used the media to impose an interpretation of the 9/11 attacks and to justify its own aggression against Afghanistan and Iraq. At that time already, it was Ben Rhodes who had been commissioned by the Bush administration to concoct the Kean/Hamilton Commission report on the attacks.
• In 2002, the CIA used five TV channels (Televen, Globovision, ValeTV and CMT) to make the public in Venezuela believe that phantom demonstrators had captured the elected president, Hugo Chávez, forcing him to resign. In reality he was the victim of a military coup d’etat.
• In 2011, France 24 served as information ministry for the Libyan CNT, according to a signed contract. During the battle of Tripoli, NATO produced fake studio films, then transmitted them via Al-Jazeera and Al-Arabiya, showing phantom images of Libyan rebels on the central square of the capital city, while in reality they were still far away. As a consequence, the inhabitants of Tripoli were persuaded that the war was lost and gave up all resistance.
Nowadays the media do not only support a war, they produce it themselves.
This procedure violates the principles of International Law, first of all Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights relating to the fact of receiving and imparting information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.” Above all, the procedure violates the United Nations General Assembly resolution, adopted after the end of World War II, to prevent further wars. Resolutions 110, 381 and 819 forbid “to set obstacles to free exchange of information and ideas” (like cutting off Syrian TV channels) and “all propaganda provoking or encouraging threats to peace, breaking peace, and all acts of aggression”. By law, war propaganda is a crime against peace, the worst of crimes, because it facilitates war crimes and genocide.
Thierry Meyssan
Translated from French by Olivia Kroth.
According to Meyssan satellite feeds will be cut and replaced with pre-filmed 'news' of alleged massacres that are immediately blamed on Assad, alleged mass protests and alleged mass resignations.
Meyssan gives examples of how similar coup's have occured in the past, including that in Venezuela which John Pilger exposes in his The War on Democracy.
I have noticed the public being prepared for this with recent reports in NATO media that the Syrian government is preparing more alleged massacres. But as of this morning 0715 GMT 12th June 2012 the UN observer mission on the ground in Syria has not formally accused Syria of committing the massacres at Houla or Qubair. It is only NATO media and politicians who accused Syria. The UNHRC in Geneva accused Syria for Houla but they took all their evidence from FSA and by phone. If anything significant has occured the position of Hasty Hague has shifted a bit. He now admits the presence of al Qaeda in Syria which he says threatens an escalation of events. What Hasty Hague fails to admit is that al Qaeda is CIA/MI6 and was injected into Syria for that very purpose!
This attempted coup comes at the same time that Russia is preparing to send a significant contingent of Russian military to Syria.
Given the worsening crisis in Syria, the Nezavisimaya Gazeta newspaper reported that the Russian army is apparently being prepared for a mission in Syria. Citing anonymous sources in the military leadership, the newspaper said that Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered the general staff to work out a plan for military operations outside Russia, including in Syria.[source : Russia prepares army for Syrian deployment, WSWS, http://www.wsws.org/articles/2012/jun2012/rusy-j12.shtml, 12/06/2012]
The units being prepared for an intervention are the 76th Division of airborne forces (an especially experienced unit of the Russian army), the 15th Army Division, as well as special forces from a brigade of the Black Sea fleet, which has a base in the Syrian port of Tartus.
NB the sources for this report are anonymous.
The dubious Debkafile reported that Obama is planning striking Syria.
Is the timing of this with the widely expected collapse of the Euro a coincidence?
===================================
From http://www.voltairenet.org/NATO-preparing-vast-disinformation
NATO preparing vast disinformation campaign
by Thierry Meyssan
Member States of NATO and the GCC are preparing a coup d’état and a sectarian genocide in Syria. If you want to prevent these crimes, you should act now: circulate this article on the Internet and alert your elected officials.
In a few days, perhaps as early as Friday, June 15, at noon, the Syrians wanting to watch their national TV stations will see them replaced on their screens by TV programs created by the CIA. Studio-shot images will show massacres that are blamed on the Syrian Government, people demonstrating, ministers and generals resigning from their posts, President Al-Assad fleeing, the rebels gathering in the big city centers, and a new government installing itself in the presidential palace.
This operation of disinformation, directly managed from Washington by Ben Rhodes, the US deputy national security adviser for strategic communication, aims at demoralizing the Syrians in order to pave the way for a coup d’etat. NATO, discontent about the double veto of Russia and China, will thus succeed in conquering Syria without attacking the country illegally. Whichever judgment you might have formed on the actual events in Syria, a coup d’etat will end all hopes of democratization.
The Arab League has officially asked the satellite operators Arabsat and Nilesat to stop broadcasting Syrian media, either public or private (Syria TV, Al-Ekbariya, Ad-Dounia, Cham TV, etc.) A precedent already exists because the Arab League had managed to censure Libyan TV in order to keep the leaders of the Jamahiriya from communicating with their people. There is no Hertz network in Syria, where TV works exclusively with satellites. The cut, however, will not leave the screens black.
Actually, this public decision is only the tip of the iceberg. According to our information several international meetings were organized during the past week to coordinate the disinformation campaign. The first two were technical meetings, held in Doha (Qatar); the third was a political meeting and took place in Riyad (Saudi Arabia).
The first meeting assembled PSYOP officers, embedded in the satellite TV channels of Al-Arabiya, Al-Jazeera, BBC, CNN, Fox, France 24, Future TV and MTV. It is known that since 1998, the officers of the US Army Psychological Operations Unit (PSYOP) have been incorporated in CNN. Since then this practice has been extended by NATO to other strategic media as well.
They fabricated false information in advance, on the basis of a “story-telling” script devised by Ben Rhodes’s team at the White House. A procedure of reciprocal validation was installed, with each media quoting the lies of the other media to render them plausible for TV spectators. The participants also decided not only to requisition the TV channels of the CIA for Syria and Lebanon (Barada, Future TV, MTV, Orient News, Syria Chaab, Syria Alghad) but also about 40 religious Wahhabi TV channels to call for confessional massacres to the cry of “Christians to Beyrouth, Alawites into the grave!.”
The second meeting was held for engineers and technicians to fabricate fictitious images, mixing one part in an outdoor studio, the other part with computer generated images. During the past weeks, studios in Saudi Arabia have been set up to build replicas of the two presidential palaces in Syria and the main squares of Damascus, Aleppo and Homs. Studios of this type already exist in Doha (Qatar), but they are not sufficient.
The third meeting was held by General James B. Smith, the US ambassador, a representative of the UK, prince Bandar Bin Sultan (whom former U.S. president George Bush named his adopted son so that the U.S. press called him “Bandar Bush”). In this meeting the media actions were coordinated with those of the Free "Syrian" Army, in which prince Bandar’s mercenaries play a decisive role.
The operation had been in the making for several months, but the U.S. National Security Council decided to accelerate the action after the Russian President, Vladimir Putin, notified the White House that he would oppose by all means, even by force, any illegal NATO military intervention in Syria.
The operation has a double intent: the first is to spread false information, the second aims at censuring all possible responses.
The hampering of TV satellites for military purposes is not new. Under pressure from Israel, the USA and the EU blocked Lebanese, Palestinian, Iraqi, Libyan and Iranian TV channels, one after the other. However, no satellite channels from other parts of the world were censured.
The broadcast of false news is also not new, but four significant steps have been taken in the art of propaganda during the last decade.
• In 1994, a pop music station named “Free Radio of the Thousand Hills” (RTML) gave the signal for genocide in Rwanda with the cry, “Kill the cockroaches!”
• In 2001, NATO used the media to impose an interpretation of the 9/11 attacks and to justify its own aggression against Afghanistan and Iraq. At that time already, it was Ben Rhodes who had been commissioned by the Bush administration to concoct the Kean/Hamilton Commission report on the attacks.
• In 2002, the CIA used five TV channels (Televen, Globovision, ValeTV and CMT) to make the public in Venezuela believe that phantom demonstrators had captured the elected president, Hugo Chávez, forcing him to resign. In reality he was the victim of a military coup d’etat.
• In 2011, France 24 served as information ministry for the Libyan CNT, according to a signed contract. During the battle of Tripoli, NATO produced fake studio films, then transmitted them via Al-Jazeera and Al-Arabiya, showing phantom images of Libyan rebels on the central square of the capital city, while in reality they were still far away. As a consequence, the inhabitants of Tripoli were persuaded that the war was lost and gave up all resistance.
Nowadays the media do not only support a war, they produce it themselves.
This procedure violates the principles of International Law, first of all Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights relating to the fact of receiving and imparting information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.” Above all, the procedure violates the United Nations General Assembly resolution, adopted after the end of World War II, to prevent further wars. Resolutions 110, 381 and 819 forbid “to set obstacles to free exchange of information and ideas” (like cutting off Syrian TV channels) and “all propaganda provoking or encouraging threats to peace, breaking peace, and all acts of aggression”. By law, war propaganda is a crime against peace, the worst of crimes, because it facilitates war crimes and genocide.
Thierry Meyssan
Translated from French by Olivia Kroth.
Sunday, June 10, 2012
IRISH FINANCE MINISTER WAS AT BILDERBERG 2012
The apparent betrayal by Rand Paul has taken the wind out of the sails of the rapidly growing anti-Bilderberg movement. The documents recently leaked to Alex Jones from the 1966 Bilderberg meeting showed what Bilderberg thinks; nationalism is dangerous.
Fast forward to today.
A deal has been reached to request a bail out for Spanish banks directly, not the government, with upto 100 billion euros from either the EFSF or the ESM (details of the potential deal have not been released).
The official attendee list for Bilderberg 2012 from Spain lists the CEO of Caixabank, the CEO of El Pais and Soraya Sáenz de Santamaría Antón, Deputy Prime Minister and also spokesperson for the Spanish government.
The official attendee list for Bilderberg 2012 lists Michael Noonan, the Minister of Finance for Ireland, along with Sutherland and Gallagher.
The EFSF currently has a lending capacity of 440 billion euros, so if this deal does go ahead then nearly a quarter of the fund will have been used to bail out the banks of just one nation in the euro zone.
The ESM has not yet been ratified, but it is considered to be a creep towards more European integration and loss of national sovereignty than the EFSF.
The deal would be overseen by the IMF, thereby further expanding the role of the IMF who said a few years ago that it would soon run the whole global economy. Indeed the terms of the ESM demand that the IMF oversee any deal involving the ESM.
This deal, if agreed, would represent a significant concession by Germany to the idea of pooled debt without brutal austerity.
And if the deal is financed by the new ESM (if ratified) then this would represent a creep towards further European integration and loss of national sovereignty.
Bilderberg Noonan is now expected to renegotiate a deal for Ireland. If Noonan can renegotiate that deal on terms similar to the one just agreed with Spain then this will be another indicator that Germany is caving into the pressure to fund a pooled debt without austerity.
So perhaps both Spain and Ireland have been used and abused to create fear and panic such that the ESM is ratified very quickly, and then be the first nations fed to the new ESM that devours national sovereignty.
This pressure to sort out Europe could also be an indicator as to who Bilderberg want for President. There have been fears expressed from the USA that Europe needs to get its house in order very quickly because any collapse in Europe would significantly affect the USA, and this is an election year in the USA. If this deal with Spain, and possibly Ireland, stops the Euro from collapsing, for now at least, then this could indicate that Obama is the chosen one.
So why was Romney at Bilderberg, as reported? Perhaps to be given the bad news that Obama is the chosen one, but also to request or demand that he trick Rand Paul into betrayal AS SOON AS POSSIBLE, to deflate the anti-Bilderberg movement, which if the scenes at the protest this year are representative, is dominated by Ron Paul supporters.
Fast forward to today.
A deal has been reached to request a bail out for Spanish banks directly, not the government, with upto 100 billion euros from either the EFSF or the ESM (details of the potential deal have not been released).
The official attendee list for Bilderberg 2012 from Spain lists the CEO of Caixabank, the CEO of El Pais and Soraya Sáenz de Santamaría Antón, Deputy Prime Minister and also spokesperson for the Spanish government.
The official attendee list for Bilderberg 2012 lists Michael Noonan, the Minister of Finance for Ireland, along with Sutherland and Gallagher.
The EFSF currently has a lending capacity of 440 billion euros, so if this deal does go ahead then nearly a quarter of the fund will have been used to bail out the banks of just one nation in the euro zone.
The ESM has not yet been ratified, but it is considered to be a creep towards more European integration and loss of national sovereignty than the EFSF.
The deal would be overseen by the IMF, thereby further expanding the role of the IMF who said a few years ago that it would soon run the whole global economy. Indeed the terms of the ESM demand that the IMF oversee any deal involving the ESM.
This deal, if agreed, would represent a significant concession by Germany to the idea of pooled debt without brutal austerity.
One consequence of our diversified strategy is that funds raised are no longer attributed to a particular country. The funds are pooled and then disbursed to programme countries upon request.[source : Lending operations, EFSF, http://www.efsf.europa.eu/about/operations/index.htm, 10/06/2012]
And if the deal is financed by the new ESM (if ratified) then this would represent a creep towards further European integration and loss of national sovereignty.
Bilderberg Noonan is now expected to renegotiate a deal for Ireland. If Noonan can renegotiate that deal on terms similar to the one just agreed with Spain then this will be another indicator that Germany is caving into the pressure to fund a pooled debt without austerity.
So perhaps both Spain and Ireland have been used and abused to create fear and panic such that the ESM is ratified very quickly, and then be the first nations fed to the new ESM that devours national sovereignty.
This pressure to sort out Europe could also be an indicator as to who Bilderberg want for President. There have been fears expressed from the USA that Europe needs to get its house in order very quickly because any collapse in Europe would significantly affect the USA, and this is an election year in the USA. If this deal with Spain, and possibly Ireland, stops the Euro from collapsing, for now at least, then this could indicate that Obama is the chosen one.
So why was Romney at Bilderberg, as reported? Perhaps to be given the bad news that Obama is the chosen one, but also to request or demand that he trick Rand Paul into betrayal AS SOON AS POSSIBLE, to deflate the anti-Bilderberg movement, which if the scenes at the protest this year are representative, is dominated by Ron Paul supporters.
Saturday, June 09, 2012
AHMED
As I point out in my analysis of the report from Tim Marshall of Sky News at Qubair, you do have to question these alleged witnesses to the massacre.
Here is a classic from Paul Danahar of the BBC.
In my analysis of the Tim Marshall report I question several things, particularly the guy who speaks to Marshall who wears a blue T shirt and red and white scarf covering his face, because there is someone wearing those clothes on the back of a motorcycle who Marshall says is an activist and is guiding them to the village. This guy tells Marshall that many were burned in one particular house, but the guy does not confirm that
1. he lives in the village
2. the house is his or knows whose house it was
3. if he is not from the village then how does he know what happened?
4. if he is from the village and is a survivor then what did he do while the alleged slaughter was occuring?
But perhaps the Syrian government should also tell us what they were doing in Qubair for nearly two days. I have more faith in their narrative at the moment, because as Alex Thomson has now found out you cannot trust the opposition, and the timing of the attack coincided very neatly with a series of meetings at the UN involving Kofi Annan and a meeting between Annan and Lillary Clinton to give Lillary a bit more psychological ammo to attack Syria with.
For example, where are the survivors from the village? Who really died? How many villagers? How many terrorists? And how did they die? Where are the corpses?
Or maybe Robert Ford can show us some more doctored satellite images?
Here is a classic from Paul Danahar of the BBC.
A man called Ahmed has come up from the village who says he witnessed the killings. He has says dozens were killed. #syria[source : Syria massacre: On the ground in Qubair, BBC, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-18371556, 08/06/2012]
He has a badly bruised face but his story is conflicted & the UN say they are not sure he's honest as they think he followed the convoy.
In my analysis of the Tim Marshall report I question several things, particularly the guy who speaks to Marshall who wears a blue T shirt and red and white scarf covering his face, because there is someone wearing those clothes on the back of a motorcycle who Marshall says is an activist and is guiding them to the village. This guy tells Marshall that many were burned in one particular house, but the guy does not confirm that
1. he lives in the village
2. the house is his or knows whose house it was
3. if he is not from the village then how does he know what happened?
4. if he is from the village and is a survivor then what did he do while the alleged slaughter was occuring?
But perhaps the Syrian government should also tell us what they were doing in Qubair for nearly two days. I have more faith in their narrative at the moment, because as Alex Thomson has now found out you cannot trust the opposition, and the timing of the attack coincided very neatly with a series of meetings at the UN involving Kofi Annan and a meeting between Annan and Lillary Clinton to give Lillary a bit more psychological ammo to attack Syria with.
For example, where are the survivors from the village? Who really died? How many villagers? How many terrorists? And how did they die? Where are the corpses?
Or maybe Robert Ford can show us some more doctored satellite images?
TIM MARSHALL AT QUBAIR
I have watched the latest report from Tim Marshall from Sky News on the alleged slaughter at Qubair (spellings vary) a few times now. He tries his best, but is falling into the same trap that Alex Thomson fell into, and one that Thomson has now discovered; NEVER TRUST THE SYRIAN OPPOSITION!
This latest report from Marshall tries its hardest to portray a massacre, and in some ways succeeds. For a brief moment I began questioning my own judgement. But there are some points that need addressing about this latest report from Marshall.
1. the report begins with Marshall being driven in a vehicle, stating that the UN were blocked from entering Qubair. However, Marshall does not give a reason. Was this because the UN themselves were not given a reason? NO! The UN and the reporters who tried to get into Qubair were told it was for their own safety. So why did Marshall leave this out? Or did he include it, but the editor (from MI6?) left it out?
2. Marshall's vehicle was guided into Qubair by "activists", which indicates that the opposition wanted to guide Marshall around the village. This is crucial.
3. Marshall is then shown following a man wearing a blue T-shirt and a red and white scarf. Is this the activist on the back of the bike that guided them into the village (see 1 minute into report)? This man shows Marshall around a house that has obviously been burned. But, crucially, the man does not claim to have lived there or be a resident of the village, but does say that many burned bodies were found there. How does he know? This man says the village was shelled by the Syrian military then the Shabiha entered the village and went from house to house slaughtering. HOW DOES THIS MAN KNOW? WHO IS HE? WHY IS HE WEARING A SCARF HIDING HIS FACE? IF HE LIVED IN THE VILLAGE DID HE SHOW MARSHALL HIS HOUSE? IF HE DOES NOT LIVE IN THE VILLAGE THEN IS HE JUST PARROTING THE FSA LINE THAT" ASSAD DID IT"?
4. There is then a scene of a burned house, Marshall mentions body parts, shows what could be a freshly dug grave (but only big enough for about 5 I would say), and then quotes "locals" who say the army made them remove all the bodies from the houses. However, Marshall does not mention exactly how many bodies were removed. Was it 5? 10? If it was a big number, such 100 as some allege were killed, then surely they would have told Marshall that and Marshall would have repeated that number. So was the number removed small but Marshall used the open-ended "all" knowing that there have been allegations of possibly 100 dead? The Syrian government says 9 died, plus however many terrorists were killed. Were the freshly dug graves for the dead terrorists?
5. Everyone who speaks to Marshall on film is male (except for the woman from the UN), young and covers their face. Why? If this was your village, your houses, where your families and loved ones had just been slaughtered, wouldn't you be shouting, cursing, demading revenge, not caring who heard or saw you? The guys (did Marshall speak to any women from the village?) also seem relatively relaxed.
6. Marshall then shows what he says are casings from bullets for what he says is a BKN machine gun. I cannot find such a weapon. But there is a PKM machine gun, Soviet made, but there is a version that was made to use standard NATO ammo.
7. Marshall then enters a room with blood splattered against the wall where he says he was told children had been shot. Who told him that?
8. But where were the people who filmed the alleged dead children? Wouldn't they want to be hanging around the village eager to speak to the Western press?
But Marshall does not address the fundamental question; WHY?
Why the hell would the Syrian military and Shabiha shell a tiny village for hours, then enter the village to slaughter men, women and children, just in time for the aftermath to be seen by those present at a UN GA meeting and a UN SC meeting at which Kofi Annan would speak about hisdevilry peace plan.
As Alex Thomson has now found out; NEVER TRUST THE SYRIAN OPPOSITION!
Marshall's report can be seen at http://news.sky.com/home/world-news/article/16243842
This latest report from Marshall tries its hardest to portray a massacre, and in some ways succeeds. For a brief moment I began questioning my own judgement. But there are some points that need addressing about this latest report from Marshall.
1. the report begins with Marshall being driven in a vehicle, stating that the UN were blocked from entering Qubair. However, Marshall does not give a reason. Was this because the UN themselves were not given a reason? NO! The UN and the reporters who tried to get into Qubair were told it was for their own safety. So why did Marshall leave this out? Or did he include it, but the editor (from MI6?) left it out?
2. Marshall's vehicle was guided into Qubair by "activists", which indicates that the opposition wanted to guide Marshall around the village. This is crucial.
3. Marshall is then shown following a man wearing a blue T-shirt and a red and white scarf. Is this the activist on the back of the bike that guided them into the village (see 1 minute into report)? This man shows Marshall around a house that has obviously been burned. But, crucially, the man does not claim to have lived there or be a resident of the village, but does say that many burned bodies were found there. How does he know? This man says the village was shelled by the Syrian military then the Shabiha entered the village and went from house to house slaughtering. HOW DOES THIS MAN KNOW? WHO IS HE? WHY IS HE WEARING A SCARF HIDING HIS FACE? IF HE LIVED IN THE VILLAGE DID HE SHOW MARSHALL HIS HOUSE? IF HE DOES NOT LIVE IN THE VILLAGE THEN IS HE JUST PARROTING THE FSA LINE THAT" ASSAD DID IT"?
4. There is then a scene of a burned house, Marshall mentions body parts, shows what could be a freshly dug grave (but only big enough for about 5 I would say), and then quotes "locals" who say the army made them remove all the bodies from the houses. However, Marshall does not mention exactly how many bodies were removed. Was it 5? 10? If it was a big number, such 100 as some allege were killed, then surely they would have told Marshall that and Marshall would have repeated that number. So was the number removed small but Marshall used the open-ended "all" knowing that there have been allegations of possibly 100 dead? The Syrian government says 9 died, plus however many terrorists were killed. Were the freshly dug graves for the dead terrorists?
5. Everyone who speaks to Marshall on film is male (except for the woman from the UN), young and covers their face. Why? If this was your village, your houses, where your families and loved ones had just been slaughtered, wouldn't you be shouting, cursing, demading revenge, not caring who heard or saw you? The guys (did Marshall speak to any women from the village?) also seem relatively relaxed.
6. Marshall then shows what he says are casings from bullets for what he says is a BKN machine gun. I cannot find such a weapon. But there is a PKM machine gun, Soviet made, but there is a version that was made to use standard NATO ammo.
7. Marshall then enters a room with blood splattered against the wall where he says he was told children had been shot. Who told him that?
8. But where were the people who filmed the alleged dead children? Wouldn't they want to be hanging around the village eager to speak to the Western press?
But Marshall does not address the fundamental question; WHY?
Why the hell would the Syrian military and Shabiha shell a tiny village for hours, then enter the village to slaughter men, women and children, just in time for the aftermath to be seen by those present at a UN GA meeting and a UN SC meeting at which Kofi Annan would speak about his
As Alex Thomson has now found out; NEVER TRUST THE SYRIAN OPPOSITION!
Marshall's report can be seen at http://news.sky.com/home/world-news/article/16243842
WAR BY ANY OTHER NAME
The Bilderberg Post continues its relentless war drive, despite recently publishing an article by Kissinger which questioned the rationality behind a war on Syria, and a recent comment by Brzezinski with the same message.
In today's The Post's View, The Bilderberg Post takes the limeade a bit by supporting the outcome of a Friends of Syrian Murdering Terrorists on Thursday in Istanbul;
OK. Let us address these points.
1. “representative and inclusive interim government”. You mean like the members have to be bought-and-paid-for, blackmailed, CFR, Bilderberg, TC, Bohemian Grove?
2. “free and fair elections”. You mean the candidates who win get financed while the losers don't, and vote fraud like was used against Ron Paul (which he did not complain against)?
3. “civilian control of the military and security forces.”. You mean the unelected UN has total control and decides where and when it can be used?
OK. Yeah. I get it.
But then there's the obligatory sabre rattling.
"irresistible force"?
But the recent statements by Kissinger and Brzezinski must be addressed.
Are they distancing themselves from any subsequent war, washing their hands, "not me, guv"?
Or are they really stating that an invasion of Syria must not take place, not yet anyway?
Is any war on Syria to be timed to coincide perfectly with the collapse of the Euro and the Dollar, maximising the psychological chaos that would occur to trick us into demanding a satanic fascist world dictatorship to stop all the chaos (that was engineered)?
Or is what we are seeing in Syria a very sinister psychological ploy against Russia and China, using the terrorists to slaughter innocent men, women and in particular children, covertly saying to Russia and China, "look, this is what we are prepared to do, but if you can get Assad out for us then we will spare the lives of all those children"?
This is war by any other name.
War on Syria.
War on Russia.
War on China.
War on me.
War on you.
In today's The Post's View, The Bilderberg Post takes the limeade a bit by supporting the outcome of a Friends of Syrian Murdering Terrorists on Thursday in Istanbul;
Ms. Clinton also laid out some specific and worthy parameters for a transition in Syria in a meeting Thursday with the Friends of Syria group in Istanbul. Ms. Clinton and a State Department briefer said these include Mr. Assad’s “full transfer of power” and departure from Syria; a “representative and inclusive interim government” that leads to “free and fair elections”; and “civilian control of the military and security forces.”[source : The U.N.’s Syria disaster, WP, http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-uns-syria-disaster/2012/06/08/gJQAD9kfOV_story.html?hpid=z3, 09/06/2012]
OK. Let us address these points.
1. “representative and inclusive interim government”. You mean like the members have to be bought-and-paid-for, blackmailed, CFR, Bilderberg, TC, Bohemian Grove?
2. “free and fair elections”. You mean the candidates who win get financed while the losers don't, and vote fraud like was used against Ron Paul (which he did not complain against)?
3. “civilian control of the military and security forces.”. You mean the unelected UN has total control and decides where and when it can be used?
OK. Yeah. I get it.
But then there's the obligatory sabre rattling.
The administration must now face how it can realistically achieve those aims. As we’ve said before, there’s a lot the United States could do, well short of invasion but well beyond the rhetoric-and-resolution approach it’s taken for more than a year. In Istanbul, Ms. Clinton discussed greater coordination of international aid for the Syrian opposition and a tightening of economic sanctions. These are steps in the right direction; but the transition in Syria will begin only when Mr. Assad is confronted with irresistible force.
"irresistible force"?
But the recent statements by Kissinger and Brzezinski must be addressed.
Are they distancing themselves from any subsequent war, washing their hands, "not me, guv"?
Or are they really stating that an invasion of Syria must not take place, not yet anyway?
Is any war on Syria to be timed to coincide perfectly with the collapse of the Euro and the Dollar, maximising the psychological chaos that would occur to trick us into demanding a satanic fascist world dictatorship to stop all the chaos (that was engineered)?
Or is what we are seeing in Syria a very sinister psychological ploy against Russia and China, using the terrorists to slaughter innocent men, women and in particular children, covertly saying to Russia and China, "look, this is what we are prepared to do, but if you can get Assad out for us then we will spare the lives of all those children"?
This is war by any other name.
War on Syria.
War on Russia.
War on China.
War on me.
War on you.
WAS KOFI ANNAN DRUNK WHEN HE MET WITH LILLARY CLINTON YESTERDAY?
And I did intend using the name Lillary, because that is what Annan called Hillary Clinton.
Watch this very brief statement given to the press yesterday by the "friends" Kofi and Lillary before their meeting.
From this very brief statement alone Annan should be removed from his position as mediator. Why?
Three points.
1. Lillary calls Annan "friend and colleague".
2. Lillary says the meeting was to discuss "how to engender greater response by the government of Syria to the six-point plan that he has put forth.".
3. Annan looked and sounded drunk.
The first point shows Annan is not neutral.
The second point shows yesterday's meeting was not about how to stop the USA and its allies from financing and arming the Syrian al Qaeda rebs, over Annan's alleged wishes, but to put all the onus on Syria who are virtually defending themselves against a covert invasion.
The third point needs no explaining.
Annan has to go. So does Ban. So does Hague.
Watch this very brief statement given to the press yesterday by the "friends" Kofi and Lillary before their meeting.
From this very brief statement alone Annan should be removed from his position as mediator. Why?
Three points.
1. Lillary calls Annan "friend and colleague".
2. Lillary says the meeting was to discuss "how to engender greater response by the government of Syria to the six-point plan that he has put forth.".
3. Annan looked and sounded drunk.
The first point shows Annan is not neutral.
The second point shows yesterday's meeting was not about how to stop the USA and its allies from financing and arming the Syrian al Qaeda rebs, over Annan's alleged wishes, but to put all the onus on Syria who are virtually defending themselves against a covert invasion.
The third point needs no explaining.
Annan has to go. So does Ban. So does Hague.
Friday, June 08, 2012
ALEX THOMSON CLAIMS SYRIAN REBELS TRIED TO GET HIM KILLED
The Channel 4 reporter Alex Thomson, who fell for all the propaganda from the rebels after the slaughter at Taldao, Houla has claimed that the rebels tried to get him killed. He says the rebels gave him directions that took the car that he was using into a free fire zone. His car was subsequently fired on by the Syrian military.
Thomson says that dead journalists are not good news for the Syrian government.
But Thomson was a virtual servant for the rebels with his coverage of the Taldao massacre. Why would the rebels send him into No Man's Land? Because they have no respect for him. And if they have no respect for him then they will lie to him.
Thomson says that dead journalists are not good news for the Syrian government.
But Thomson was a virtual servant for the rebels with his coverage of the Taldao massacre. Why would the rebels send him into No Man's Land? Because they have no respect for him. And if they have no respect for him then they will lie to him.
Channel 4 News chief correspondent Alex Thomson has claimed Syrian rebels deliberately tried to get him and his crew killed by gunfire from government forces in a bid to discredit the regime of Bashar al-Assad.[source : Syrian rebels tried to get me killed, says Channel 4 correspondent, The Guardian, http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2012/jun/08/alex-thompson-syrian-rebels, 08/06/2012
Thompson alleged a small group from the Free Syrian Army deliberately guided the vehicle in which he and his Channel 4 News colleagues were travelling into what he described as a "free-fire zone" on a blocked road in "no man's land" in the vicinity of the city of al-Qusayr, because "dead journos are bad for Damascus".
WILL RON PAUL ENDORSE ROMNEY?
Rand Paul has now endorsed Mitt Romney. There is outrage on the Ron Paul website. Many believe the endorsement was to get the VP slot for Rand.
Cue Tarpley...
Cue Tarpley...
THE ROLE OF THE UNITED NATIONS SECRETARY GENERAL
...The Charter also empowers the Secretary-General to "bring to the attention of the Security Council any matter which in his opinion may threaten the maintenance of international peace and security".[source : THE ROLE OF THE SECRETARY-GENERAL, United Nations, http://www.un.org/sg/sg_role.shtml, 08/06/2012]
...One of the most vital roles played by the Secretary-General is the use of his "good offices" -- steps taken publicly and in private, drawing upon his independence, impartiality and integrity, to prevent international disputes from arising, escalating or spreading.
It is one thing to bring to the attention of the world a potential civil war in Syria.
But it is quite another to say that a particular government is illegitimate.
Why is the government of Qatar legitimate, even though they are financing the Syrian opposition contrary to Annan's apparent wishes?
Why is the government of the USA legitimate, even though there is a massive controversy over who the hell Obama really is?
The role of the UN Secretary General is as Chief Administrative Officer. It does not involve taking sides.
Ban Ki Moon has taken sides.
He has to go (along with William Hague).
WHY IS WEBSTER TARPLEY UNDER SIEGE?
Last night Alex Jones called Webster Tarpley a Marxist-Leninist, which apparently Tarpley has admitted himself (but I am unaware of such a confession).
Tarpley has tweeted
This is apparently in response to show that Tarpley supports the American System of economics.
Tarpley has been accusing Ron Paul of selling out, citing the nepotism of Paul, clandestine meetings with Neocons, curious finance, genocidal economic policies, the tardiness of signing upto HR 107, and an apparent support of Romney. I must admit that Tarpley does have a point.
Tarpley also supports the Syriza movement in Greece, who threaten to implement anti-banker policies if they are elected. Again, Tarpley has a point.
But I would question the whole Europe ideal. If the idea all along has been to create Europe to destroy it (and if Europe's banks do indeed need nearly $10 trillion to be bailed out in just this year alone then that is probably the case) then Tarpley is absolutely correct. However, if the plan is to create a united Europe somehow, and at all costs, then for Tsipras and Syriza will One Europe take precedence over the anti-banker policies of Syriza?
The World Socialist Website accuses of Tsipras and Syriza of selling out.
The WSWS article does not give any references for such claims.
So, on with fighting whoever you want to fight!
Who do you really want to fight?
Tarpley has tweeted
Not #British agent #KarlMarx, but #AmericanSystem of #BenFranklin #AlexanderHamilton #HenryClay #Lincoln #Populists #FDR #NewDeal #JFK[source : https://twitter.com/#!/WebsterGTarpley]
This is apparently in response to show that Tarpley supports the American System of economics.
Tarpley has been accusing Ron Paul of selling out, citing the nepotism of Paul, clandestine meetings with Neocons, curious finance, genocidal economic policies, the tardiness of signing upto HR 107, and an apparent support of Romney. I must admit that Tarpley does have a point.
Tarpley also supports the Syriza movement in Greece, who threaten to implement anti-banker policies if they are elected. Again, Tarpley has a point.
But I would question the whole Europe ideal. If the idea all along has been to create Europe to destroy it (and if Europe's banks do indeed need nearly $10 trillion to be bailed out in just this year alone then that is probably the case) then Tarpley is absolutely correct. However, if the plan is to create a united Europe somehow, and at all costs, then for Tsipras and Syriza will One Europe take precedence over the anti-banker policies of Syriza?
The World Socialist Website accuses of Tsipras and Syriza of selling out.
When he speaks to the international press, as opposed to the Greek electorate, Tsipras makes clear that his party, once in power, would do what is necessary to satisfy the financial markets. SYRIZA hopes to carry out a program combining bailouts to key banks and corporations with austerity measures against the working class.[source : The euro crisis and the role of SYRIZA, WSWS, http://www.wsws.org/articles/2012/jun2012/pers-j08.shtml, 08/06/2012]
Tsipras has repeatedly said that SYRIZA seeks above all to remain in the EU. It will not only agree to structural “reforms”—which have already slashed wages and wiped out tens of thousands of jobs—but also honor the country’s debts, which the EU has used as a lever for the last two years to impose the austerity measures.
The WSWS article does not give any references for such claims.
So, on with fighting whoever you want to fight!
Who do you really want to fight?
SPOT THE DIFFERENCE
There is already some inconsistency in reports in NATO media of alleged witnesses to the alleged Qubair massacre.
Can you spot the difference here?
Two unnamed witnesses give two different accounts.
Who were these witnesses?
How was communication established?
How were their accounts taken, e.g. phone?
Indeed, in complete contrast to the reports from Taldao, Houla, there seems to be a dearth of times in NATO media, with the very, very general narrative that "shabiha did it". One witness quoted in The Guardian article cited above even goes so far as to say he knew the killers from school!
However, the names of the alleged criminals are not supplied in the article, which is very suspect, because a name would definitely help to incriminate the Shabiha. Neither is an exact time given. This is important because I will attempt to explain what I think may be going down here.
The Syrian Rep to the UN said the killing of any civilians took place 5 hours before any clashes between the military and the terrorists.
Recall the mass resignations from al Jazeera earlier this year due to the bias shown against Assad and Syria by al Jazeera, with some who resigned saying that some of the reports were just made up.
And the under siege Webster Tarpley concurs with me that Ban Ki Moon has to go. Ban has gone way beyond his role as a neutral secretary and has taken sides. In an interview with Press TV Tarpley again proposed that corpses long dead have been dug up and filmed as though they had just been killed at Qubair, in an attempt similar to that used by the Nazis at Gleiwitz.
Perhaps the lack of times in the NATO media is due to this possible series of events.
1. Corpses (not from Qubair) were dug up and filmed as though they had just been massacred at Qubair. Sound effects were added. We do not see any landmarks to verify the films were shot at Qubair. The film of these long dead corpses are released just in time for a UN GA and UN SC meeting at which the quesionable Kofi Annan was due to speak about his devilry.
2. An attack by terrorists at Qubair takes place, again just in time for a UN GA and UN SC meeting at which the quesionable Kofi Annan was due to speak about his devilry. The villagers call in the Syrian military for help. A battle between the Syrian military and Shabiha on the one side and the terrorists on the other then takes place.
3. And here is the tricky bit that may explain the absence of specific times. The reports from 'witnesses' do not give times because they did indeed observe Shabiha entering the village, but this was to assist the Syrian military to attack the terrorists in Qubair AFTER the residents had fled asking the Syrian military for help. After going into the village only 9 residents had been killed, and they had been killed by the terrorists.
This kind of media operation would require an extraordinary level of coordination between the SNC, FSA, terrorists and NATO media.
However, they are working together and they all want the same thing; the removal of Assad.
We have to question:
1. the timing of the alleged massacre, coming just before two very big meetings at the UN involving Kofi Annan
2. the attendance of Bassma Kodmani, the head of the Syrian National Transitional Council, at Bilderberg just days before the alleged massacre at Qubair, particularly as the SNC took the lead in reporting this alleged massacre at Qubair when the FSA took the lead at Taldao, Houla.
3. why would anyone want to attack this remote cluster of farms, terrorists or the Syrian military/Shabiha? As The Guardian article referenced above states:
Were the families there pro- or anti-Assad? Were they Sunni, Shia or Christian? Were the terrorists extorting money?
Anyway, here is the under siege Webster Tarpley speaking on Press TV.
Can you spot the difference here?
A resident said troops shelled the area for five hours Wednesday before government-aligned militiamen known as "shabiha" entered the area that is known to shelter army defectors, "killing and hacking everyone they could find."[source : Syria: UN observers come under fire trying to reach site of latest massacre, The Daily Telegraph, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/syria/9318478/Syria-UN-observers-come-under-fire-trying-to-reach-site-of-latest-massacre.html, 08/06/2012]
A second witness, who did not want to be named, said shelling of the area had started at around 2pm.[source : Assad regime has lost humanity – UN, The Guardian, http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/jun/07/assad-regime-un, 08/06/2012]
He said gunfire then followed around 2.45pm, lasting for 30 minutes, before a second burst of fire later.
Two unnamed witnesses give two different accounts.
Who were these witnesses?
How was communication established?
How were their accounts taken, e.g. phone?
Indeed, in complete contrast to the reports from Taldao, Houla, there seems to be a dearth of times in NATO media, with the very, very general narrative that "shabiha did it". One witness quoted in The Guardian article cited above even goes so far as to say he knew the killers from school!
"I knew some of them from school," he said. "I know their names, I know their villages. I know exactly who they are. They are Shabiha, no doubt. They passed by here with the regime army."
However, the names of the alleged criminals are not supplied in the article, which is very suspect, because a name would definitely help to incriminate the Shabiha. Neither is an exact time given. This is important because I will attempt to explain what I think may be going down here.
The Syrian Rep to the UN said the killing of any civilians took place 5 hours before any clashes between the military and the terrorists.
Al-Jaafari said that killing innocent civilians in al-Qubeir took place 5 hours before any clashes happened, adding that the images broadcast by al-Jazeera and al-Arabia are not those of the massacre victims.[source : Al-Jaafari: Arab, Regional capitals support armed groups which Boast of committing terror acts in Syria, SANA, http://www.sana.sy/eng/22/2012/06/08/424146.htm, 08/06/2012]
Recall the mass resignations from al Jazeera earlier this year due to the bias shown against Assad and Syria by al Jazeera, with some who resigned saying that some of the reports were just made up.
And the under siege Webster Tarpley concurs with me that Ban Ki Moon has to go. Ban has gone way beyond his role as a neutral secretary and has taken sides. In an interview with Press TV Tarpley again proposed that corpses long dead have been dug up and filmed as though they had just been killed at Qubair, in an attempt similar to that used by the Nazis at Gleiwitz.
Perhaps the lack of times in the NATO media is due to this possible series of events.
1. Corpses (not from Qubair) were dug up and filmed as though they had just been massacred at Qubair. Sound effects were added. We do not see any landmarks to verify the films were shot at Qubair. The film of these long dead corpses are released just in time for a UN GA and UN SC meeting at which the quesionable Kofi Annan was due to speak about his devilry.
2. An attack by terrorists at Qubair takes place, again just in time for a UN GA and UN SC meeting at which the quesionable Kofi Annan was due to speak about his devilry. The villagers call in the Syrian military for help. A battle between the Syrian military and Shabiha on the one side and the terrorists on the other then takes place.
3. And here is the tricky bit that may explain the absence of specific times. The reports from 'witnesses' do not give times because they did indeed observe Shabiha entering the village, but this was to assist the Syrian military to attack the terrorists in Qubair AFTER the residents had fled asking the Syrian military for help. After going into the village only 9 residents had been killed, and they had been killed by the terrorists.
This kind of media operation would require an extraordinary level of coordination between the SNC, FSA, terrorists and NATO media.
However, they are working together and they all want the same thing; the removal of Assad.
We have to question:
1. the timing of the alleged massacre, coming just before two very big meetings at the UN involving Kofi Annan
2. the attendance of Bassma Kodmani, the head of the Syrian National Transitional Council, at Bilderberg just days before the alleged massacre at Qubair, particularly as the SNC took the lead in reporting this alleged massacre at Qubair when the FSA took the lead at Taldao, Houla.
3. why would anyone want to attack this remote cluster of farms, terrorists or the Syrian military/Shabiha? As The Guardian article referenced above states:
He said that Mazraat had not been a politically active area during the 16-month uprising, nor had it been a stronghold of the Free Syrian Army, which continues to battle loyalist forces on most days. "This is a farming community," he said.
Were the families there pro- or anti-Assad? Were they Sunni, Shia or Christian? Were the terrorists extorting money?
Anyway, here is the under siege Webster Tarpley speaking on Press TV.
Thursday, June 07, 2012
NAMED SURVIVORS OF LATEST ALLEGED MASSACRE ACCUSE TERRORISTS
Two named witnesses of the latest alleged massacre at al-Qubeir say terrorists did it and the village residents asked the Syrian military to protect them.
Perhaps, as the village is very small (I read 120 people lived there), the correspondents from Sky etc. can also interview them or other residents? These correspondents have been quick to tweet that they were prevented from entering the village, questioning the reason given that it was for their safety.
==========================
From http://www.sana.sy/eng/21/2012/06/07/424129.htm
Mazraat al-Qubeir People Tell of Horror and Armed Terrorist Groups' Crimes against them
Jun 07, 2012
HAMA, (SANA) – Several people from Mazraat al-Qubeir and Marzaf villages in Hama countryside narrated the horror and crimes which were committed by the armed terrorist groups against them, revealing the reality of the horrific crime which took place in their village last night as 9 citizens were killed with cold blood.
In phone calls with the Syrian TV, Abu Hawash, a citizen from Mazraat al-Qubeir village, said that armed terrorists who had RPG launchers and PKC machineguns stormed the area and attacked children and women, calling on the Syrian army and law-enforcement forces to protect them from the terrorists.
Another citizen denounced the bloody satellite channels which are counterfeiting the truth to serve their interests.
For his part, Abu Mohammad said an armed terrorist group infiltrated to Mazraat al-Qubeir and killed 9 citizens, adding that after the crime took place, the residents called the authorities to protect them.
F.Allafi/Ghossoun
Perhaps, as the village is very small (I read 120 people lived there), the correspondents from Sky etc. can also interview them or other residents? These correspondents have been quick to tweet that they were prevented from entering the village, questioning the reason given that it was for their safety.
==========================
From http://www.sana.sy/eng/21/2012/06/07/424129.htm
Mazraat al-Qubeir People Tell of Horror and Armed Terrorist Groups' Crimes against them
Jun 07, 2012
HAMA, (SANA) – Several people from Mazraat al-Qubeir and Marzaf villages in Hama countryside narrated the horror and crimes which were committed by the armed terrorist groups against them, revealing the reality of the horrific crime which took place in their village last night as 9 citizens were killed with cold blood.
In phone calls with the Syrian TV, Abu Hawash, a citizen from Mazraat al-Qubeir village, said that armed terrorists who had RPG launchers and PKC machineguns stormed the area and attacked children and women, calling on the Syrian army and law-enforcement forces to protect them from the terrorists.
Another citizen denounced the bloody satellite channels which are counterfeiting the truth to serve their interests.
For his part, Abu Mohammad said an armed terrorist group infiltrated to Mazraat al-Qubeir and killed 9 citizens, adding that after the crime took place, the residents called the authorities to protect them.
F.Allafi/Ghossoun
ANNAN STABS HIS OWN PEACE PLAN IN THE BACK AND BAN GIVES HIM THE KNIFE
I thought the peace plan put forth by Kofi Annan was a piece of devilry.
Now Annan has stabbed his own peace plan in the back, and has been joined by Ban Ki Moon.
In his speech to the UN GA (not SC as I first thought) today Annan puts all the onus on Assad.
So let's get this straight.
The FSA has unilaterally scrapped the ceasefire who "have intensified their attacks". There is a widely acknowledged terrorist "third actor", who many know are Sunni al Qaeda types as exposed in Seymour Hersh's The Redirection, who are sponsored with $100 million by those utopias of Sunni freedom the absolute monarchies of Saudi Arabia and Qatar with assistance from MI6, CIA, DGSE, Mossad, i.e. the whole opposition, armed and terrorist, is foreign. Hell, the head of the Syrian National Council just attended Bilderberg!
Yet Annan expects Assad to just allow them to get on with it and take over Syria to implement a vicious Sunni anarchy persecuting all religions?!?!
Assad should tell Annan to go to hell!!
Annan should first and foremost be demanding that Saudi Arabia and Qatar cease and desist from their financial support of the opposition, and also demand that the UK, USA, France and Israel cease and desist from their assistance, lethal and nonlethal, of the opposition, be they unarmed, armed or terrorist.
Ban Ki Moon, who in his role as UN Sec Gen is supposed to be neutral and keep his mouth shut, and simply facilitate the functioning of the UN, has declared Assad as illegitimate.
Both Annan and Ban should be immediately relieved of their duties.
Now Annan has stabbed his own peace plan in the back, and has been joined by Ban Ki Moon.
In his speech to the UN GA (not SC as I first thought) today Annan puts all the onus on Assad.
Nine days ago, I met President Assad in Damascus. I told him that the six-point plan is not being implemented as it must. I strongly urged him to take bold and visible steps to now radically change his military posture and honour his commitments to the six-point plan. I urged him to make a strategic decision to change his path. I also made clear that his Government must work with my mediation effort on behalf of both Organizations that I represent.[source : Annan's remarks before UN General Assembly, UN, http://un-report.blogspot.co.uk/2012/06/annans-remarks-before-un-general.html?spref=tw, 07/06/2012]
President Assad believed the main obstacle was the actions of militants. Clearly, all parties must cease violence. But equally clearly, the first responsibility lies with the Government.
...Armed opposition groups have stated that they see no reason to respect cessation of hostilities. They have intensified their attacks, which will not serve the cause of the Syrian people. And the situation is made more complex and deadly by a series of bombings -- some of which are indicative of the presence of a third actor.
So let's get this straight.
The FSA has unilaterally scrapped the ceasefire who "have intensified their attacks". There is a widely acknowledged terrorist "third actor", who many know are Sunni al Qaeda types as exposed in Seymour Hersh's The Redirection, who are sponsored with $100 million by those utopias of Sunni freedom the absolute monarchies of Saudi Arabia and Qatar with assistance from MI6, CIA, DGSE, Mossad, i.e. the whole opposition, armed and terrorist, is foreign. Hell, the head of the Syrian National Council just attended Bilderberg!
Yet Annan expects Assad to just allow them to get on with it and take over Syria to implement a vicious Sunni anarchy persecuting all religions?!?!
Assad should tell Annan to go to hell!!
Annan should first and foremost be demanding that Saudi Arabia and Qatar cease and desist from their financial support of the opposition, and also demand that the UK, USA, France and Israel cease and desist from their assistance, lethal and nonlethal, of the opposition, be they unarmed, armed or terrorist.
Ban Ki Moon, who in his role as UN Sec Gen is supposed to be neutral and keep his mouth shut, and simply facilitate the functioning of the UN, has declared Assad as illegitimate.
3.45pm: Syria: Addressing the UN general assembly, Ban Ki-moon also said: "President Assad and his government have lost all legitimacy". He added:[source : Annan at UN amid reports of new Syria massacre – live updates, The Guardian, http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/middle-east-live/2012/jun/07/syria-massacre-un-security-council, 07/06/2012]
He called on Assad to "urgently and unconditionally" implement the six-point plan put forward by Kofi Annan.
Both Annan and Ban should be immediately relieved of their duties.
UN OBSERVERS BLOCKED FOR THEIR OWN SAFETY
Much is being made of the reports that the UN observers are being blocked by the Syrian military and the residents from the villages where the latest massacre in Syria is alleged to have occured. Initial reports gave no reason for this blocking. But The Independent is now reporting that this is for their own safety.
The Syrian government says there was an attack on the villages by terrorists and they received calls for help from the residents so they sent in the military.
This is also being reported by the BBC.
So is it possible that some of the terrorists are still in the village?
But this BBC report ends with some alarming information. Apparently the word on the street now is that most of those killed at Houla were sprayed with automatic gun fire.
If this is true then this would be a third method of killing. First it was shelling from the Syrian military. Then it was from up close by bullets to the head and throats cut. Now they say it was from "gunfire raking rooms"?
This is getting rather ridiculous.
UN monitors said this afternoon that they have been unable to access the site of an alleged massacre in Syria.[source : UN blocked from accessing site of alleged Syria massacre, The Independent, http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/un-blocked-from-accessing-site-of-alleged-syria-massacre-7826482.html, 07/06/2012]
General Robert Mood said observers were told by residents in the area that they would be at risk if they entered Mazraat al-Qubair in central Hama province.
The Syrian government says there was an attack on the villages by terrorists and they received calls for help from the residents so they sent in the military.
This is also being reported by the BBC.
Gen Robert Mood, the commander of the UN mission, said civilians were also stopping UN patrols in the Hama area.[source : Syria 'blocks' UN from Qubair 'massacre site', BBC, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-18352281, 07/06/2012]
"We are receiving information from residents of the area that the safety of our observers is at risk if we enter [the] village," he said.
"Despite these challenges, the observers are still working to get into the village to try to establish the facts on the ground."
...State TV reported that security forces had launched an attack on an "armed terrorist stronghold" in Qubair after appeals from citizens.
So is it possible that some of the terrorists are still in the village?
But this BBC report ends with some alarming information. Apparently the word on the street now is that most of those killed at Houla were sprayed with automatic gun fire.
Members of the international community in Damascus say that most victims at Houla were killed by gunfire raking rooms and not in execution-style killings, contrary to initial reports.
Also, people's throats were not cut at Houla, although one person did have an eye gouged out, the sources now say.
If this is true then this would be a third method of killing. First it was shelling from the Syrian military. Then it was from up close by bullets to the head and throats cut. Now they say it was from "gunfire raking rooms"?
This is getting rather ridiculous.
DON'T BLAME IT ON THE MERKEL
If the plan all along has been to blow up the Euro then the perps will need a scapegoat. And as I suggested last week Merkel will be that scapegoat. So far she has been resisting bailing out Europe using Germany's credit rating to issue Eurobonds, despite many senior Bilderbergers suggesting that Eurobonds are the only way to save Europe and the Euro, and also warning that if Merkel did not agree to Eurobonds then Germany would suffer too as Europe fell into chaos.
Yesterday six German banks were downgraded, i.e. attacked by Wall Street.
Some reports have suggested that European banks will need nearly $10 trillion, just this year, and this is being covered up by the IMF. If this is true then I doubt that Germany could rescue Europe no matter what Merkel does.
So if the Euro is blown up, and that this has been planned for many decades, then we will all be encouraged to sing,
But Europe is under threat because of deriviatives. A massive credit bubble based on property was inflated and money loaned to anyone irrespective of their ability to pay. As I understand it, derivatives first appeared in the 1980's. But the EU and Euro were agreed at Bilderberg 1955. This would mean that for at least 30 years Europe was being created to be destroyed. But by 1955 had the method of detonation been agreed? Or have they been waiting and waiting and waiting for the method to appear?
Yesterday six German banks were downgraded, i.e. attacked by Wall Street.
Some reports have suggested that European banks will need nearly $10 trillion, just this year, and this is being covered up by the IMF. If this is true then I doubt that Germany could rescue Europe no matter what Merkel does.
So if the Euro is blown up, and that this has been planned for many decades, then we will all be encouraged to sing,
Don't blame it on the sunshine.
Don't blame it on the moonlight.
Don't blame it on the good times.
Blame it on the Merkel.
But Europe is under threat because of deriviatives. A massive credit bubble based on property was inflated and money loaned to anyone irrespective of their ability to pay. As I understand it, derivatives first appeared in the 1980's. But the EU and Euro were agreed at Bilderberg 1955. This would mean that for at least 30 years Europe was being created to be destroyed. But by 1955 had the method of detonation been agreed? Or have they been waiting and waiting and waiting for the method to appear?
A TEENY WEENY BIT BETTER REPORTING OF LATEST ALLEGED SLAUGHTER IN SYRIA
There is a slightly less bias in the reporting of the latest alleged slaughter in Syria, with some (but not all) reporters questioning the timing of the slaughter, and Hague has so far not been as hasty with his embarrassing accusations (which suggests that he does have some intelligence and can learn something). But there is still an implicit accusation that Assad did it.
But last week the unwitting and biased world condemned Syria at the UN Human Rights Council, even though the UN admitted that all its evidence had been taken from the opposition and by phone!
At that meeting the Syrian representative had this to say.
Well, the UN Security Council will meet today to discuss with Kofi Annan the situation in Syria.
Another 'coincidence' is that the villages where this latest slaughter occured are not too far from Rastan, where many of the terrorists who committed the Taldao massacre came from.
But last week the unwitting and biased world condemned Syria at the UN Human Rights Council, even though the UN admitted that all its evidence had been taken from the opposition and by phone!
At that meeting the Syrian representative had this to say.
"It has become common for the armed terrorist groups to commit their massacres at specific timings as to precede a Security Council session or the visit of international envoy Kofi Annan,"[source : Al-Hamwi: Way of Committing al-Houla Massacre Indicates That Terrorists Are Resposnible, SANA, http://www.sana.sy/eng/22/2012/06/02/422872.htm, 02/06/2012]
Well, the UN Security Council will meet today to discuss with Kofi Annan the situation in Syria.
Another 'coincidence' is that the villages where this latest slaughter occured are not too far from Rastan, where many of the terrorists who committed the Taldao massacre came from.
Wednesday, June 06, 2012
WHAT A SYRIAN COINCIDENCE
Just before a meeting of the UNSC on Syria yet another massacre attributed to Assad by the FSA has occured.
Let us try an exercise in psychology.
Read this, and then ask yourself what you think
Now read this.
Spot the difference?
They say the same thing but in a different order.
In the former the emotion of a massacre takes precedence over the messenger. In the latter the messenger takes precedence over the massacre.
But should the hapless Jim Muir, who reported this, be able to report this alleged massacre without confirmation? After all, the BBC is a news agency isn't it, and not a propaganda unit of MI5 and MI6?
BOLLOCKS!
I have had my eye on Muir since the Aleppo bombings earlier this year. He is just a brainless repeater. He does not think about who could benefit from his repetition of what he is told. And none of his reports have carried the alternative view of events of the Taldao massacre that are corroborated and make much more sense.
The BBC is just a small cog in the NATO media apparatus blasting out propaganda for war and/or the police state. The slaughter of Taldao was sussed out and distributed quickly and the drive to war was smashed.
So they have got their death squad mercs to commit another atrocity.
But look who tells the BBC what happened; a spokesman for the Syrian National Council! The key member of the of the SNC, Bassma Kodmani, was just at Bilderberg 2012!!
What a fucking coincidence!
Just after Bilderberg 2012 a bigger more federalised Europe is proposed, and a new alleged and unconfirmed massacre instantly attributed to Assad is reported.
The clueless Alex Thomson recently suggested that the emails and phone calls of the Syrian military should be examined for proof of complicity in the Taldao massacre. I am 100% confident that an examination of Kodmani's communications since the weekend will reveal who did and did not commit this latest alleged massacre.
But have you recently noticed in the NATO media the threats of a civil war in Syria if Russia did not concede to a regime change in Syria, blaming Russia for any subsequent civil war? This is just one manifestation of the evil that is driving the seven-nations-in-five-years plan revealed to General Wesley Clark shortly after the inside job 9/11.
If this line is conceded then it will just move on to Iran.
At least 86 people, including many women and children, have been killed by Syrian pro-government forces in Hama province, opposition activists say.[source : New 'massacre' reported in Syria's Hama province, BBC, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-18348201, 06/06/2012]
A spokesman for the Syrian National Council, the main opposition coalition, said there had been a "massacre" in the villages of Qubair and Maarzaf.
Let us try an exercise in psychology.
Read this, and then ask yourself what you think
At least 86 people, including many women and children, have been killed by Syrian pro-government forces in Hama province, opposition activists say.
Now read this.
Opposition activists say at least 86 people, including many women and children, have been killed by Syrian pro-government forces in Hama province.
Spot the difference?
They say the same thing but in a different order.
In the former the emotion of a massacre takes precedence over the messenger. In the latter the messenger takes precedence over the massacre.
But should the hapless Jim Muir, who reported this, be able to report this alleged massacre without confirmation? After all, the BBC is a news agency isn't it, and not a propaganda unit of MI5 and MI6?
BOLLOCKS!
I have had my eye on Muir since the Aleppo bombings earlier this year. He is just a brainless repeater. He does not think about who could benefit from his repetition of what he is told. And none of his reports have carried the alternative view of events of the Taldao massacre that are corroborated and make much more sense.
The BBC is just a small cog in the NATO media apparatus blasting out propaganda for war and/or the police state. The slaughter of Taldao was sussed out and distributed quickly and the drive to war was smashed.
So they have got their death squad mercs to commit another atrocity.
But look who tells the BBC what happened; a spokesman for the Syrian National Council! The key member of the of the SNC, Bassma Kodmani, was just at Bilderberg 2012!!
What a fucking coincidence!
Just after Bilderberg 2012 a bigger more federalised Europe is proposed, and a new alleged and unconfirmed massacre instantly attributed to Assad is reported.
The clueless Alex Thomson recently suggested that the emails and phone calls of the Syrian military should be examined for proof of complicity in the Taldao massacre. I am 100% confident that an examination of Kodmani's communications since the weekend will reveal who did and did not commit this latest alleged massacre.
But have you recently noticed in the NATO media the threats of a civil war in Syria if Russia did not concede to a regime change in Syria, blaming Russia for any subsequent civil war? This is just one manifestation of the evil that is driving the seven-nations-in-five-years plan revealed to General Wesley Clark shortly after the inside job 9/11.
If this line is conceded then it will just move on to Iran.
THE MOST DETAILED REPORT OF THE TALDAO MASSACRE I HAVE READ SO FAR
This report from Thierry Meyssan on the Taldao massacre I think will not be far from the truth of what really happened. It also incorporates a suggestion made by the under siege Webster Tarpley who within hours of reports of the slaughter taking place suggested that corpses had been procured to make the slaughter look more bloody than it was.
I still want to know if the FSA used any agency or training from Great Britain in portraying the massacre as committed by Assad. The NATO media was very eager to accuse Assad, but now that accounts that make much more sense are available and accuse FSA/terrorist death squads they seem more concerned about what Kate Middleton was wearing over the Diamond Jubilee.
===========================
From http://www.voltairenet.org/The-Houla-affair-highlights
The Houla affair highlights Western intelligence gap in Syria
by Thierry Meyssan
Given that the West is never wrong, it is unlikely it will acknowledge its errors over the Houla massacre. What matters, however, is not whether or not it will rectify the false image portrayed by its propaganda on Syria, but the way in which the balance of power between NATO and SCO is changing. For the Houla affair shows that the West is incapable of knowing the situation on the ground, whereas Russian military intelligence is privy to exactly what is happening.
Voltaire Network | Damascus (Syria) | 5 June 2012
108 bodies were laid out by the Free ’Syrian’ Army [1] in a mosque in Houla. According to the rebels, these were the remains of civilians massacred on 25 May 2012 by pro-government militia known as ‘Shabbihas’.
The Syrian government appeared completely shocked by the news. It immediately condemned the killings, which it attributed to the armed opposition.
While the national news agency, SANA, was unable to provide details with certainty, the Syrian Catholic news agency, Vox Clamantis, immediately issued a testimony of some of the events formally accusing the opposition [2]. Five days later, the Russian news channel Rossiya 24 (ex Vesti) aired a very detailed 45-minute report, which remains to date the most comprehensive public inquiry [3].
The West and Gulf States who are working towards a "regime change" in Syria and have already recognized the opposition as a privileged interlocutor, have adopted the FSA’s version of events without waiting for the report from the United Nations Supervision Mission (UNSMIS). As a sanction, most of them have resorted to a prearranged measure, namely the expulsion of Syrian ambassadors to their respective countries. This does not represent a rupture of diplomatic relations, as the rest of the accredited Syrian diplomatic personnel will remain stationed where they are.
The United Nations Security Council adopted a presidential statement condemning the massacre without indicating who was responsible. It furthermore reminded the Syrian government of its responsibilities, namely the protection of its people using proportionate measures, that’s to say without the use of heavy weapons [4].
Contrary to this, the High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay endorsed the allegations blaming the Syrian authorities, and demanded that the case be transferred to the International Criminal Court.
French President François Hollande and his Foreign Affairs Minister Laurent Fabius have announced their intention to convince Russia and China not to obstruct a future Security Council’s resolution authorizing the use of force, while the French press is accusing Russia and China of protecting a criminal regime.
Responding to these charges, Russia’s First Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Andrey Denissov expressed regret over France’s “basically emotional reaction” – devoid of analysis. He reiterated that the steadfast position of his country, in this case as for others, is not to support governments, but peoples (it being understood that the Syrian people elected President al-Assad at the last constitutional referendum).
The United Nations Supervision Mission went to Damascus at the request of the Syrian government. It was received by the opposition who control this zone, and was able to establish various observations to be used in writing its status report. At an internal press briefing, the President of the Syrian investigation Commission into the massacre read a brief statement revealing the initial elements of the current investigation. According to him, the massacre was carried out by the opposition as part of an FSA military operation in the area.
Aware that the findings of the UN Supervision Mission report may backfire on them, the Western countries requested that the Human Rights Council in Geneva (which is under their control) set up another investigation Commission. A report from this body could be produced quickly in order to impose a version of events before the Supervision Mission is able to draw its own conclusions.
How can we know what happened in Houla?
Two main factors are impeding the work of investigators. The Syrian government lost control of Houla many weeks ago. Syrian magistrates are therefore unable to go to Houla, and even if some journalists are able to do so, this is only with the permission of and under close surveillance by the FSA. There is however one exception: a team from Rossiya 24, the 24-hour Russian news channel was able to move around the area without an escort, and produce an exceptionally detailed report.
The official Syrian Commission claims to have collected several witness statements, but has declared that these shall only be presented to the press once the final report has been established. At present, the identity of these witnesses remains protected by investigation secrecy. However, several of the accounts were broadcast on public television on 1st June.
The investigators are also in possession of videos provided exclusively by the FSA.
Lastly, since the FSA amassed the bodies in a mosque and began burying them the very next day, it was not possible for UN observers to carry out forensic assessments on many of the dead.
Voltaire Network ’s conclusions
Houla is not a town, but an administrative area made up of three villages, each with about 25,000 residents but which today lie largely abandoned. The Sunni market town of Tal Daw has been under rebel control for many weeks. The Free "Syrian" Army had imposed its rule there. The national Army was securing transport routes by maintaining several posts on roads within the area, but did not venture beyond these roads.
Certain individuals kidnapped children and attempted unsuccessfully to extort ransoms. [5] In the end, these children were killed a few days before the Houla massacre, but their bodies were brought by the Free "Syrian" Army to be laid out amongst the others.
In the evening of 24 May, the Free "Syrian" Army launched a very large-scale operation to reinforce its control over the region, and to make Tal Daw its new base. In order to do this, 600-800 combatants from various districts gathered in Rastan and Saan and proceeded to launch simultaneous attacks on the military bases. At the same time, a team was fortifying Tal Daw by installing five anti-tank missile batteries, and purging the town of some of its inhabitants.
The first victims in Tel Daw were a dozen people related to Abd al-Muty Mashlab – a legislator of the recently elected Baas party who was appointed Secretary of the National Assembly; following this, the family of a senior official – Mouawyya al-Sayyed – was killed. Subsequent targets were families of Sunni origin who had converted to Shiite Islam. Other victims included the family of two journalists for Top News and New Orient News, press agencies associated with Voltaire Network. Many people, including children, were raped before being killed.
With only one of the Army’s bases having fallen, the assailants changed strategy. They transformed a military defeat into a communication operation, attacking the al-Watani hospital and setting fire to it. They took corpses from the hospital morgue and transported them along with those of other victims to the mosque, where the bodies were filmed.
The theory of a single massacre perpetrated by pro-government militia does not stand up to the facts. There were battles which took place between loyalists and rebels, as well as several massacres of pro-government civilians at the hands of the rebels. Then, a scenario was staged by the Free "Syrian" Army where corpses originating from these various earlier situations were mixed together.
Indeed, the existence of the "Shabbihas" is a myth. Whilst there are certainly individuals in favour of the government who are armed and capable of committing acts of revenge, there is no structure or organized group that could be termed as a pro-government militia.
Political and diplomatic implications
The expulsion of Syrian ambassadors by Western countries is a measure that was planned well in advance and therefore well-coordinated. Westerners were waiting for a massacre of this type before carrying out this action. They ignored numerous previous massacres that they knew had been perpetrated by the Free "Syrian" Army, and seized on this one believing that it had been committed by pro-government militia.
The idea of a coordinated expulsion did not emanate from Paris, rather from Washington. Paris in principle gave its agreement, without having examined the legal implications. For in practice, Lamia Chakkour is also the Syrian Ambassador to UNESCO, and cannot therefore (according to the terms of the accord de siège) be expelled from French territory. Further to this, even if she were not accredited to UNESCO, her French-Syrian dual nationality means that she cannot be expelled from French territory.
These expulsions were coordinated by Washington to create the illusion of a general movement in order to put pressure on Russia. Indeed, the US is looking to test the new international balance of power, to size up Russia’s reactions and to find out how far they will go.
The choice of the Houla affair, however, has been a tactical error. Washington seized upon the affair without checking the details, thinking that nobody would be able to verify it. This was forgetting that Russia has moved into the country – with over 100,000 Russians currently residing in Syria. Of course, they did not deploy a high-tech anti-aircraft defense system just to discourage NATO from bombarding Syria; they also set up information bases including troops that are able to move around rebel controlled areas. In this way, Moscow was able to shed light on the facts within a few days. Their specialists succeeded in identifying the 13 members of the FSA guilty of these killings and gave their names to the Syrian authorities. With this, not only did Moscow not waver, it has hardened its stance.
For Vladimir Putin, the fact that the West wanted to make the Houla massacre into their symbol shows that they are out of touch with the reality on the ground. Having withdrawn the officers in charge of the Free "Syrian" Army, the only information available to the West comes from their drones and satellites observing what is happening. They have become vulnerable to the lies and vaunting of the mercenaries they have deployed on the terrain.
For Moscow, this massacre is just another tragedy like many others that Syrians have been enduring for the last year. But hasty instrumentation on the part of the West shows that they have failed to develop a new collective strategy since the fall of the Islamic district of Baba Amr. In essence, they are but acting on guesswork, which is allowing others to gain the upper-hand.
Thierry Meyssan
Translated from French by Katy Stone.
[1] Voltaire Network has chosen to write FSA with ’Syrian’ in inverted commas to indicate that this militia is largely composed of foreigners, and that it’s commander is not Syrian.
[2] "Irreversible divisons in Syria," VoxClamantis, 26 May 2012.
[3] Global Research translated to English the transcript of extracts from this programme, see "Opposition Terrorists “Killed Families Loyal to the Government”", Voltaire Network 1 June 2012.
[4] "Syrie : que dit le Conseil de sécurité ?," by Thierry Meyssan, Réseau Voltaire, 28 May 2012.
[5] This is currently a security problem in the country. Many of the thugs that had been recruited to swell the ranks of the Free "Syrian" Army were demobilized due to lack of funding. Remaining in the possession of arms provided by the West, they are turning to crime - mainly kidnappings for ransom.
I still want to know if the FSA used any agency or training from Great Britain in portraying the massacre as committed by Assad. The NATO media was very eager to accuse Assad, but now that accounts that make much more sense are available and accuse FSA/terrorist death squads they seem more concerned about what Kate Middleton was wearing over the Diamond Jubilee.
===========================
From http://www.voltairenet.org/The-Houla-affair-highlights
The Houla affair highlights Western intelligence gap in Syria
by Thierry Meyssan
Given that the West is never wrong, it is unlikely it will acknowledge its errors over the Houla massacre. What matters, however, is not whether or not it will rectify the false image portrayed by its propaganda on Syria, but the way in which the balance of power between NATO and SCO is changing. For the Houla affair shows that the West is incapable of knowing the situation on the ground, whereas Russian military intelligence is privy to exactly what is happening.
Voltaire Network | Damascus (Syria) | 5 June 2012
108 bodies were laid out by the Free ’Syrian’ Army [1] in a mosque in Houla. According to the rebels, these were the remains of civilians massacred on 25 May 2012 by pro-government militia known as ‘Shabbihas’.
The Syrian government appeared completely shocked by the news. It immediately condemned the killings, which it attributed to the armed opposition.
While the national news agency, SANA, was unable to provide details with certainty, the Syrian Catholic news agency, Vox Clamantis, immediately issued a testimony of some of the events formally accusing the opposition [2]. Five days later, the Russian news channel Rossiya 24 (ex Vesti) aired a very detailed 45-minute report, which remains to date the most comprehensive public inquiry [3].
The West and Gulf States who are working towards a "regime change" in Syria and have already recognized the opposition as a privileged interlocutor, have adopted the FSA’s version of events without waiting for the report from the United Nations Supervision Mission (UNSMIS). As a sanction, most of them have resorted to a prearranged measure, namely the expulsion of Syrian ambassadors to their respective countries. This does not represent a rupture of diplomatic relations, as the rest of the accredited Syrian diplomatic personnel will remain stationed where they are.
The United Nations Security Council adopted a presidential statement condemning the massacre without indicating who was responsible. It furthermore reminded the Syrian government of its responsibilities, namely the protection of its people using proportionate measures, that’s to say without the use of heavy weapons [4].
Contrary to this, the High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay endorsed the allegations blaming the Syrian authorities, and demanded that the case be transferred to the International Criminal Court.
French President François Hollande and his Foreign Affairs Minister Laurent Fabius have announced their intention to convince Russia and China not to obstruct a future Security Council’s resolution authorizing the use of force, while the French press is accusing Russia and China of protecting a criminal regime.
Responding to these charges, Russia’s First Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Andrey Denissov expressed regret over France’s “basically emotional reaction” – devoid of analysis. He reiterated that the steadfast position of his country, in this case as for others, is not to support governments, but peoples (it being understood that the Syrian people elected President al-Assad at the last constitutional referendum).
The United Nations Supervision Mission went to Damascus at the request of the Syrian government. It was received by the opposition who control this zone, and was able to establish various observations to be used in writing its status report. At an internal press briefing, the President of the Syrian investigation Commission into the massacre read a brief statement revealing the initial elements of the current investigation. According to him, the massacre was carried out by the opposition as part of an FSA military operation in the area.
Aware that the findings of the UN Supervision Mission report may backfire on them, the Western countries requested that the Human Rights Council in Geneva (which is under their control) set up another investigation Commission. A report from this body could be produced quickly in order to impose a version of events before the Supervision Mission is able to draw its own conclusions.
How can we know what happened in Houla?
Two main factors are impeding the work of investigators. The Syrian government lost control of Houla many weeks ago. Syrian magistrates are therefore unable to go to Houla, and even if some journalists are able to do so, this is only with the permission of and under close surveillance by the FSA. There is however one exception: a team from Rossiya 24, the 24-hour Russian news channel was able to move around the area without an escort, and produce an exceptionally detailed report.
The official Syrian Commission claims to have collected several witness statements, but has declared that these shall only be presented to the press once the final report has been established. At present, the identity of these witnesses remains protected by investigation secrecy. However, several of the accounts were broadcast on public television on 1st June.
The investigators are also in possession of videos provided exclusively by the FSA.
Lastly, since the FSA amassed the bodies in a mosque and began burying them the very next day, it was not possible for UN observers to carry out forensic assessments on many of the dead.
Voltaire Network ’s conclusions
Houla is not a town, but an administrative area made up of three villages, each with about 25,000 residents but which today lie largely abandoned. The Sunni market town of Tal Daw has been under rebel control for many weeks. The Free "Syrian" Army had imposed its rule there. The national Army was securing transport routes by maintaining several posts on roads within the area, but did not venture beyond these roads.
Certain individuals kidnapped children and attempted unsuccessfully to extort ransoms. [5] In the end, these children were killed a few days before the Houla massacre, but their bodies were brought by the Free "Syrian" Army to be laid out amongst the others.
In the evening of 24 May, the Free "Syrian" Army launched a very large-scale operation to reinforce its control over the region, and to make Tal Daw its new base. In order to do this, 600-800 combatants from various districts gathered in Rastan and Saan and proceeded to launch simultaneous attacks on the military bases. At the same time, a team was fortifying Tal Daw by installing five anti-tank missile batteries, and purging the town of some of its inhabitants.
The first victims in Tel Daw were a dozen people related to Abd al-Muty Mashlab – a legislator of the recently elected Baas party who was appointed Secretary of the National Assembly; following this, the family of a senior official – Mouawyya al-Sayyed – was killed. Subsequent targets were families of Sunni origin who had converted to Shiite Islam. Other victims included the family of two journalists for Top News and New Orient News, press agencies associated with Voltaire Network. Many people, including children, were raped before being killed.
With only one of the Army’s bases having fallen, the assailants changed strategy. They transformed a military defeat into a communication operation, attacking the al-Watani hospital and setting fire to it. They took corpses from the hospital morgue and transported them along with those of other victims to the mosque, where the bodies were filmed.
The theory of a single massacre perpetrated by pro-government militia does not stand up to the facts. There were battles which took place between loyalists and rebels, as well as several massacres of pro-government civilians at the hands of the rebels. Then, a scenario was staged by the Free "Syrian" Army where corpses originating from these various earlier situations were mixed together.
Indeed, the existence of the "Shabbihas" is a myth. Whilst there are certainly individuals in favour of the government who are armed and capable of committing acts of revenge, there is no structure or organized group that could be termed as a pro-government militia.
Political and diplomatic implications
The expulsion of Syrian ambassadors by Western countries is a measure that was planned well in advance and therefore well-coordinated. Westerners were waiting for a massacre of this type before carrying out this action. They ignored numerous previous massacres that they knew had been perpetrated by the Free "Syrian" Army, and seized on this one believing that it had been committed by pro-government militia.
The idea of a coordinated expulsion did not emanate from Paris, rather from Washington. Paris in principle gave its agreement, without having examined the legal implications. For in practice, Lamia Chakkour is also the Syrian Ambassador to UNESCO, and cannot therefore (according to the terms of the accord de siège) be expelled from French territory. Further to this, even if she were not accredited to UNESCO, her French-Syrian dual nationality means that she cannot be expelled from French territory.
These expulsions were coordinated by Washington to create the illusion of a general movement in order to put pressure on Russia. Indeed, the US is looking to test the new international balance of power, to size up Russia’s reactions and to find out how far they will go.
The choice of the Houla affair, however, has been a tactical error. Washington seized upon the affair without checking the details, thinking that nobody would be able to verify it. This was forgetting that Russia has moved into the country – with over 100,000 Russians currently residing in Syria. Of course, they did not deploy a high-tech anti-aircraft defense system just to discourage NATO from bombarding Syria; they also set up information bases including troops that are able to move around rebel controlled areas. In this way, Moscow was able to shed light on the facts within a few days. Their specialists succeeded in identifying the 13 members of the FSA guilty of these killings and gave their names to the Syrian authorities. With this, not only did Moscow not waver, it has hardened its stance.
For Vladimir Putin, the fact that the West wanted to make the Houla massacre into their symbol shows that they are out of touch with the reality on the ground. Having withdrawn the officers in charge of the Free "Syrian" Army, the only information available to the West comes from their drones and satellites observing what is happening. They have become vulnerable to the lies and vaunting of the mercenaries they have deployed on the terrain.
For Moscow, this massacre is just another tragedy like many others that Syrians have been enduring for the last year. But hasty instrumentation on the part of the West shows that they have failed to develop a new collective strategy since the fall of the Islamic district of Baba Amr. In essence, they are but acting on guesswork, which is allowing others to gain the upper-hand.
Thierry Meyssan
Translated from French by Katy Stone.
[1] Voltaire Network has chosen to write FSA with ’Syrian’ in inverted commas to indicate that this militia is largely composed of foreigners, and that it’s commander is not Syrian.
[2] "Irreversible divisons in Syria," VoxClamantis, 26 May 2012.
[3] Global Research translated to English the transcript of extracts from this programme, see "Opposition Terrorists “Killed Families Loyal to the Government”", Voltaire Network 1 June 2012.
[4] "Syrie : que dit le Conseil de sécurité ?," by Thierry Meyssan, Réseau Voltaire, 28 May 2012.
[5] This is currently a security problem in the country. Many of the thugs that had been recruited to swell the ranks of the Free "Syrian" Army were demobilized due to lack of funding. Remaining in the possession of arms provided by the West, they are turning to crime - mainly kidnappings for ransom.
Tuesday, June 05, 2012
THE SYNCHRONICITY OF CLIFF RICHARD
Cliff Richard has had a very successful career spanning decades.
But of all the songs he could have performed, this one stood out the most; Devil Woman.
Was this a personal request?
But of all the songs he could have performed, this one stood out the most; Devil Woman.
Was this a personal request?
She is a devil woman
With evil on her mind
She is a devil woman
She's gonna get you.
JUST DAYS AFTER BILDERBERG AND BIGGER EUROPE WITH POOLED DEBT IS ON
Well. I said Merkel would agree to some kind of pooled debt but would demand a bigger, closer Europe.
And it all comes just days after Bilderberg 2012.
Monti, Barroso, etc had all been calling for Eurobonds, in which Germany would take all the risk, but a different and more subtle solution is being proposed, but in this solution Germany would take all the risk.
Confused?
You should be.
When it comes to this knd of international finance you are just supposed to shut up, drink your chemical water, eat your GM food, watch brainless TV and soak in all the pro-war propaganda.
Is Tsipras (the communist) prepared to cede yet more Greek sovereignty to a centralised Federal Europe?
And it all comes just days after Bilderberg 2012.
Monti, Barroso, etc had all been calling for Eurobonds, in which Germany would take all the risk, but a different and more subtle solution is being proposed, but in this solution Germany would take all the risk.
Confused?
You should be.
When it comes to this knd of international finance you are just supposed to shut up, drink your chemical water, eat your GM food, watch brainless TV and soak in all the pro-war propaganda.
Is Tsipras (the communist) prepared to cede yet more Greek sovereignty to a centralised Federal Europe?
Pressed by a banking crisis and turmoil in the markets, Germany has indicated that it is prepared to accept a grand bargain that would provide greater support for its most indebted euro zone partners in exchange for more centralized control over government spending in Europe.[source : Germany Is Open to Pooling Debt, With Conditions, New York Times, 05/06/2012]
...German officials remain adamant that they are not talking about euro bonds, or jointly issued debt, which they have dismissed as unconstitutional. More likely is a plan to combine much of Europe’s bad debt into a single fund with the idea of paying it off over 25 years, an idea gaining traction in Germany as an alternative to euro bonds, officials say.
German leaders have not provided details of a potential deal — and not every country may be eager to sign on — but it would be likely to mean an expansion of executive power in Brussels over fiscal targets in member states and supervision of their banks, along with Europewide deposit insurance. It would go far beyond what was contemplated for Europe even six months ago.
...“Merkel is slowly adapting to different times because she is afraid of not jumping on the train in time,” said Stefan Kornelius, foreign editor of the German newspaper Süddeutsche Zeitung. “She doesn’t want to be the gravedigger for the euro.”
Monday, June 04, 2012
BSF AND SAS TO START WW3
The Daily Star is reporting that BSF and SAS are preparing to set up 'safe havens' on Syrian soil. This is being sold as 'humanitarian', because the alleged purpose of the camps is protect fleeing Syrians. These camps will not serve this purpose, not exclusively. The true purpose of these camps is to entice Syria into attacking them by protecting, traning and supplying the FSA and NATO-backed death squads.
The camps will be on Syrian soil.
There are refugee camps all along the Syrian borders already. So why have some more inside Syria? Because the slaughter of 50 children by NATO-backed bandit death squads in Taldao, Houla on 25th May did not work, was exposed for the provocation it obviously was, and has backfired. Therefore to get an invasion and/or war Syria must be shown to be the aggressor in a different way.
I don't know who has specifically requested this move, but whoever it is has decided that sacrificing BSF and SAS is, at this time, a risk worth taking, and that BSF are expendable.
But the Daily Star article is very revealing in other ways too. Apparently SAS and MI6 are in Syria already, to allegedly take photos of massacres etc, and the BSF are ready to join in.
That last sentence says it all, a certain arrogance. Syria will attack them, because they will be used for protecting, training and supplying the al Qaeda rebs, or a false flag attack blamed on Syria will occur.
This is a move of total madness and total desperation, and I would plead with anyone who knows anyone who knows anyone in Syria with BSF not to do this.
The fact that they were prepared to use the deaths of children who had their throats cut by NATO-backed bandit death squads to create yet more slaughter shows they have a complete hatred of humanity. This is exposed by their Satanist activities.
The camps will be on Syrian soil.
There are refugee camps all along the Syrian borders already. So why have some more inside Syria? Because the slaughter of 50 children by NATO-backed bandit death squads in Taldao, Houla on 25th May did not work, was exposed for the provocation it obviously was, and has backfired. Therefore to get an invasion and/or war Syria must be shown to be the aggressor in a different way.
I don't know who has specifically requested this move, but whoever it is has decided that sacrificing BSF and SAS is, at this time, a risk worth taking, and that BSF are expendable.
But the Daily Star article is very revealing in other ways too. Apparently SAS and MI6 are in Syria already, to allegedly take photos of massacres etc, and the BSF are ready to join in.
BRITISH defence chiefs have drawn up secret plans to set up safe havens for Syrians fleeing President Assad’s killers.[source : SAS SET UP SAFE CAMPS IN SYRIA, The Daily Star, http://www.dailystar.co.uk/posts/view/254674/SAS-set-up-safe-camps-in-Syria/, 03/06/2012]
Special Forces will help protect the refugees in Syria along the borders.
...SAS troops and MI6 agents are in the country ready to help rebels if civil war breaks out as expected this weekend.
...And if civil war breaks out the crack troops are on hand to help with fighting, said the insider.
They also have hi-tech satellite computers and radios that can instantly send back photos and details of refugees and Assad’s forces as the situation develops.
...“Safe havens would be an invasion of Syria but a chance to save lives,” said a senior Whitehall source.
...Safe havens are expected to be set up around areas that are easily accessible and even within walking distance of troublespots.
...It is thought Syrian forces would not dare to come that close to the border.
That last sentence says it all, a certain arrogance. Syria will attack them, because they will be used for protecting, training and supplying the al Qaeda rebs, or a false flag attack blamed on Syria will occur.
This is a move of total madness and total desperation, and I would plead with anyone who knows anyone who knows anyone in Syria with BSF not to do this.
The fact that they were prepared to use the deaths of children who had their throats cut by NATO-backed bandit death squads to create yet more slaughter shows they have a complete hatred of humanity. This is exposed by their Satanist activities.
AND WHEN GOD GAZED UPON LONDON HE WEPT
Yesterday was dominated by coverage of the record-breaking flotilla on the River Thames in London, in honour of the Diamond Jubilee.
For early June it was ridiculously cold.
And God cried his tears of pain and sorrow.
For when God gazed upon London he wept. He wept with all his heart and soul.
What has been accomplished in 60 years?
One of the most unequal societies on the planet, with the wealth gap between rich and poor widening significantly, even under Labour.
Austerity everywhere, except in a few palaces and barges, caused by two Knights of the Realm and their ilk, and no banker in jail.
Open calls for mass extermination of the human population.
The nurture of Islamic extremism through a Covenant of Security, and the subsequent wars and terrorism that are still ongoing, in Syria, and soon Iran.
And an out-of-control banking system that serves the oligarchy and threatens the stability of the whole planet.
So to honour our Islamic extremist allies who massacred men, women and children in Taldao last weekend to try to get a war on Syria started, please stand up, salute and sing
For early June it was ridiculously cold.
And God cried his tears of pain and sorrow.
For when God gazed upon London he wept. He wept with all his heart and soul.
What has been accomplished in 60 years?
One of the most unequal societies on the planet, with the wealth gap between rich and poor widening significantly, even under Labour.
Austerity everywhere, except in a few palaces and barges, caused by two Knights of the Realm and their ilk, and no banker in jail.
Open calls for mass extermination of the human population.
The nurture of Islamic extremism through a Covenant of Security, and the subsequent wars and terrorism that are still ongoing, in Syria, and soon Iran.
And an out-of-control banking system that serves the oligarchy and threatens the stability of the whole planet.
So to honour our Islamic extremist allies who massacred men, women and children in Taldao last weekend to try to get a war on Syria started, please stand up, salute and sing
God save our gracious Queen
Long live our noble Queen
Allah U Akbar
Send her victorious
Happy and glorious
Long to reign over us
Allah U Akbar
Sunday, June 03, 2012
BRITISH INVOLVEMENT IN TALDAO MASSACRE
Was there any British involvement in the Taldao massacre of last weekend?
Possible involvement could be (even from last year)
1. British Special Forces training
2. British Special Forces advice
3. British Special Forces logistics
4. British Special Forces communications
5. Any 'non lethal' assistance provided by The FCO and/or William Hague, such as
a. communication equipment
b. bullet proof vests
c. public relations training of the FSA to portray the massacre as perpetrated by Assad
d. clothing
The clueless Mark Lyall Grant now admits that there are armed terrorist gangs operating in Syria, which is something that Assad has said all along, and is something that the Arab League monitors concluded earlier this year before they were silenced and torpedoed by the Friends of Syria, with the report from the monitors buried by the NATO media.
Hasty Hague's scandalous and embarrassing rush to judgement could also indicate a foreknowledge of the tragic events of Taldao. He had just returned from a NATO meeting in Chicago. I doubt that explicit plans were agreed or discussed about accelerating the faltering war on Syria, but there may well have been a "Who will rid me of this troublesome priest?" discussion with other concerned persons present or by phone. The response to the massacre from Hague, Clinton and NATO media was suspiciously strong and well coordinated.
We must know precisely what BSF are doing and have been doing in and around Syria. Hague has just tried to mug us all off, and failed.
Possible involvement could be (even from last year)
1. British Special Forces training
2. British Special Forces advice
3. British Special Forces logistics
4. British Special Forces communications
5. Any 'non lethal' assistance provided by The FCO and/or William Hague, such as
a. communication equipment
b. bullet proof vests
c. public relations training of the FSA to portray the massacre as perpetrated by Assad
d. clothing
The clueless Mark Lyall Grant now admits that there are armed terrorist gangs operating in Syria, which is something that Assad has said all along, and is something that the Arab League monitors concluded earlier this year before they were silenced and torpedoed by the Friends of Syria, with the report from the monitors buried by the NATO media.
Hasty Hague's scandalous and embarrassing rush to judgement could also indicate a foreknowledge of the tragic events of Taldao. He had just returned from a NATO meeting in Chicago. I doubt that explicit plans were agreed or discussed about accelerating the faltering war on Syria, but there may well have been a "Who will rid me of this troublesome priest?" discussion with other concerned persons present or by phone. The response to the massacre from Hague, Clinton and NATO media was suspiciously strong and well coordinated.
We must know precisely what BSF are doing and have been doing in and around Syria. Hague has just tried to mug us all off, and failed.
Saturday, June 02, 2012
TALDAO : AS CLEAR AS BLOOD
It is now becoming clearer what happened last weekend in Taldao.
Two families in particular were targetted.
The Abdelrazzaq family and al Sayed family.
Regarding the Abdelrazzaq's, over 60 were killed from this one family. They occupied a small cluster of houses close together. It is reported that this family refused to join the rebellion and supported Assad.
Regarding the al Sayed family, a similar story exists, with one member recently elected to the Syrian People's Assembly.
SANA now quotes witnesses that say the killers were selective, killing the al Sayed family, but leaving the families living either side of the al Sayeds alone.
In typical one-sided fashion, The Guardian has an article that attempts to create a timeline of the events last weekend. Their source?
So no biased sources then.
There is also a ridiculous quote from a 'nurse' in the same article.
So according to this 'nurse', who at least admits that these two families were targetted because they were Assad supporters, the militia killed over 60 from one family who supported Assad and many more from the pro-Assad al Sayed family, when the militia are said to be pro-Assad?! They killed about 40 anti-Assad but then killed 70 pro-Assad? Naaa. Don't believe it.
Over 60 from one family alone! That's over half the total!
Other aspects of the events of Taldao last weekend not mentioned in the NATO media are
1. the deaths of and injuries to local policemen and military, which if true would indicate a strong presence of FSA in the area at the time, and if the FSA were in the area at the time then what did they do stop the slaughter?
2. the attack on a local hospital (same question)
How easy would it be for a anti-Assad Sunni bandit death squad to enter the town, slaughter two pro-Assad families, claim to some that they were local militia from neighbouring towns to blame it on them, then allow those survivors to survive to tell the tale, then disappear into the night, then for the NATO media to instantly claim Assad did it to get a war going?
Remember. All this happened in broad daylight over half a day in a FSA stronghold. Plenty of film of the aftermath; dead children, corpses ready for burial, etc, but only one dodgy film of one alleged shelling, which actually shows a man with a RPG.
Two families in particular were targetted.
The Abdelrazzaq family and al Sayed family.
Regarding the Abdelrazzaq's, over 60 were killed from this one family. They occupied a small cluster of houses close together. It is reported that this family refused to join the rebellion and supported Assad.
Regarding the al Sayed family, a similar story exists, with one member recently elected to the Syrian People's Assembly.
SANA now quotes witnesses that say the killers were selective, killing the al Sayed family, but leaving the families living either side of the al Sayeds alone.
The witness noted that next to al-Sayed house was a house belonging to Nidal Bakkour, the leader of another group, and that the people in that house are still alive while the others were killed, and that the same applies to several houses near the detachment, concluding that the massacre was simply an attack against specific families by the gunmen.[source : Witnesses to al-Houla Massacre: Massacres Were Carried Out Against Specific Families That Support the Government, SANA, http://www.sana.sy/eng/337/2012/06/02/422915.htm, 02/06/2012]
...The witness added that another family that was targeted is Abdelrazzaq family which consists of four household and supports the government, noting that the houses belong to al-Sayed family are located next to the houses of gunmen and their relatives, wondering how the gunmen's children weren't killed if the attack had been perpetrated by "Shabiha" as some claim?
In typical one-sided fashion, The Guardian has an article that attempts to create a timeline of the events last weekend. Their source?
Maysara, a local elder who doubles as a leader in the Syrian Revolutionary Council, said the shelling lasted for about three hours.[source : The Houla massacre: reconstructing the events of 25 May, The Guardian, http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/jun/01/houla-massacre-reconstructing-25-may, 02/06/2012]
So no biased sources then.
There is also a ridiculous quote from a 'nurse' in the same article.
"They were targeted because they were linked to the regime," one of the nurses treating the wounded men said. "The Shabiha wanted to create the impression that other forces were responsible."
So according to this 'nurse', who at least admits that these two families were targetted because they were Assad supporters, the militia killed over 60 from one family who supported Assad and many more from the pro-Assad al Sayed family, when the militia are said to be pro-Assad?! They killed about 40 anti-Assad but then killed 70 pro-Assad? Naaa. Don't believe it.
Over 60 from one family alone! That's over half the total!
Other aspects of the events of Taldao last weekend not mentioned in the NATO media are
1. the deaths of and injuries to local policemen and military, which if true would indicate a strong presence of FSA in the area at the time, and if the FSA were in the area at the time then what did they do stop the slaughter?
2. the attack on a local hospital (same question)
How easy would it be for a anti-Assad Sunni bandit death squad to enter the town, slaughter two pro-Assad families, claim to some that they were local militia from neighbouring towns to blame it on them, then allow those survivors to survive to tell the tale, then disappear into the night, then for the NATO media to instantly claim Assad did it to get a war going?
Remember. All this happened in broad daylight over half a day in a FSA stronghold. Plenty of film of the aftermath; dead children, corpses ready for burial, etc, but only one dodgy film of one alleged shelling, which actually shows a man with a RPG.
THE GUILT OF ROBERT STEPHEN FORD
The US Ambassador to Syria, Robert S Ford, has published some curious photos taken by satellite on the Embassy Facebook website. This is covered in everybody's favourite NATO media The Guardian.
Ford says the photos show a mass grave in Taldao that was not present before the slaughter of last weekend.
So what?
Is Ford suggesting that this is a mass grave in Taldao that has not yet been discovered by the residents of Taldao? I find it impossible that a week later such a mass grave lies undiscovered by the residents of Taldao.
So is Ford suggesting that the local militia dug the grave themselves during or after their alleged slaughter? The questions raised by this make the NATO media narrative even more ludicrous. For what such a mass grave would imply is that besides the local militia being able to walk the streets of the FSA stronghold Taldao for hours, in broad daylight, in military fatigues, and slaughter children for hours without any resident filming it or the FSA themselves intervening, the militia even had time to at least dig a mass grave to bury their victims.
But if the image shows a mass grave that we know about already, then what is Ford telling us? "Look. Here is a grave that you all know about already."?
I think Ford is guilty, and he knows it.
For those who don't know, Ford was involved in the formation of death squads in Iraq.
Even the clueless British Ambassador to the UN Mark Lyall Grant admits the presence of death squads in Syria.
The US state department has published satellite photos said to show mass graves in Syria after government forces attacked civilian areas.[source : Satellite pictures back up Houla massacre accounts, The Guardian, http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/jun/02/satellite-pictures-houla-massacre, 02/06/2012]
A website operated by the department is displaying the photos, taken by a commercial satellite, of what it says are mass graves dug following a massacre near the town of Houla.
Ford says the photos show a mass grave in Taldao that was not present before the slaughter of last weekend.
So what?
Is Ford suggesting that this is a mass grave in Taldao that has not yet been discovered by the residents of Taldao? I find it impossible that a week later such a mass grave lies undiscovered by the residents of Taldao.
So is Ford suggesting that the local militia dug the grave themselves during or after their alleged slaughter? The questions raised by this make the NATO media narrative even more ludicrous. For what such a mass grave would imply is that besides the local militia being able to walk the streets of the FSA stronghold Taldao for hours, in broad daylight, in military fatigues, and slaughter children for hours without any resident filming it or the FSA themselves intervening, the militia even had time to at least dig a mass grave to bury their victims.
But if the image shows a mass grave that we know about already, then what is Ford telling us? "Look. Here is a grave that you all know about already."?
I think Ford is guilty, and he knows it.
For those who don't know, Ford was involved in the formation of death squads in Iraq.
Even the clueless British Ambassador to the UN Mark Lyall Grant admits the presence of death squads in Syria.
DEADLY VIRUS
In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, to contribute something to solving overpopulation - Prince Philip, 1998
In the event that I am reincarnated, I do not want to return as a deadly virus, to contribute something to solving the myth of overpopulation - me, this morning.
In the event that I am reincarnated, I do not want to return as a deadly virus, to contribute something to solving the myth of overpopulation - me, this morning.
THE BEST GIFT HM QUEEN COULD GIVE TO HER LOYAL SUBJECTS ON THIS JOYOUS OCCASION
A strand of her hair?
HEED MY WARNING
Should a strange, swirling mist begin to form outside your window tonight, and you hear a tap, tap, tapping at the window from an undead child hovering in the air begging you to let him in, do not open your window.
For the love of God, do not let him in.
For Bilderberg is in town.
For the love of God, do not let him in.
For Bilderberg is in town.
BILDERBERG BOLES
Why is Nick Boles at the Salem's Lot Bilderberg meeting?
I would guess it is because he is a member of the Henry Jackson Society. Here are three of their principles.
Point 3 indicates a desire to implement R2P. Point 4 indicates a big Europe but under British control.
Boles is a Kennedy Scholar, and also founded Policy Exchange, which is one of the best funded think tanks, is credited with creating the current Conservative Party policies, and is alleged to be David Cameron's favourite think tank. Policy Exchange tried to promote a massive anti-Islam movement shortly after 9/11, with an investigation into radical Islam in British mosques, but as far as I am aware did not mention the Covenant of Security that was agreed between MI5 and the Islamic terrorists that allowed them to stay here and promote their vicious brand of Islam.
With his other activities Boles should fit well intoSalem's Lot Bilderberg.
I would guess it is because he is a member of the Henry Jackson Society. Here are three of their principles.
3.Supports the maintenance of a strong military, by the United States, the countries of the European Union and other democratic powers, armed with expeditionary capabilities with a global reach, that can protect our homelands from strategic threats, forestall terrorist attacks, and prevent genocide or massive ethnic cleansing.[source : http://henryjacksonsociety.org/about-the-society/statement-of-principles/, 02/06/2012]
4.Supports the necessary furtherance of European military modernisation and integration under British leadership, preferably within NATO.
5.Stresses the importance of unity between the world’s great democracies, represented by institutions such as NATO, the European Union and the OECD, amongst many others.
Point 3 indicates a desire to implement R2P. Point 4 indicates a big Europe but under British control.
Boles is a Kennedy Scholar, and also founded Policy Exchange, which is one of the best funded think tanks, is credited with creating the current Conservative Party policies, and is alleged to be David Cameron's favourite think tank. Policy Exchange tried to promote a massive anti-Islam movement shortly after 9/11, with an investigation into radical Islam in British mosques, but as far as I am aware did not mention the Covenant of Security that was agreed between MI5 and the Islamic terrorists that allowed them to stay here and promote their vicious brand of Islam.
With his other activities Boles should fit well into
Friday, June 01, 2012
HOW WILL US MILITARY TAKE ALLEGATION THAT BILDERBERG WANTS RON PAUL BLOWN UP ON A PLANE?
According to Alex Jones the majority of the US military rank and file support Ron Paul.
It has been alleged that members of Bilderberg at their current meeting have expressed their hatred of Paul by wishing that he and his supporters should be put on a plane and blown up and it be blamed on a suicide Islamist.
But the US military rank and file are Ron Paul supporters.
How will the US military rank and file take this?
How does US Joint Chief of Staff Dempsey take this expression of Bilderberg wanting to kill his staff?
But this attitude of Bilderberg towards the US military is nothing new. A major Bilderberg attendee Henry Kissinger calls the military "dumb stupid animals".
It has been alleged that members of Bilderberg at their current meeting have expressed their hatred of Paul by wishing that he and his supporters should be put on a plane and blown up and it be blamed on a suicide Islamist.
But the US military rank and file are Ron Paul supporters.
How will the US military rank and file take this?
How does US Joint Chief of Staff Dempsey take this expression of Bilderberg wanting to kill his staff?
But this attitude of Bilderberg towards the US military is nothing new. A major Bilderberg attendee Henry Kissinger calls the military "dumb stupid animals".
BILDERBERG POST CALLS FOR SAFE ZONES INSIDE SYRIA PROTECTED BY TURKEY
The Washington Post's View on Syria attempts to be caring and full of concern for the Syrian people, but is far from it. What the Bilderberg Post proposes will lead to WW3.
In the following, the reference to Susan Rice is her concern that the most likely outcome in Syria now is, “The violence escalates, the conflict spreads and intensifies, it reaches a higher degree of severity, it involves countries in the region, it takes on increasingly sectarian forms and we have a major crisis not only in Syria but the region.”
But what about stopping arming and financing the lying child-murdering terrorists?
The Bilderberg Post then makes its proposal.
See what I mean?
Will the USA creating safe zones inside Syria where the FSA can train to kill Syrian military "stop a regional war"?
This is such a desperate suggestion bordering on lunacy.
Syria would clearly attack such zones. If Turkey is protecting those zones then Turkish troops would no doubt die. Turkey would then cite The Washington Treaty, probably Clause 5, and NATO would then intervene. Then Russia would no doubt join in.
No. Do not create safe zones for lying child-murdering terrorists to train in.
STOP ARMING AND FINANCING THEM!
In the following, the reference to Susan Rice is her concern that the most likely outcome in Syria now is, “The violence escalates, the conflict spreads and intensifies, it reaches a higher degree of severity, it involves countries in the region, it takes on increasingly sectarian forms and we have a major crisis not only in Syria but the region.”
But what about stopping arming and financing the lying child-murdering terrorists?
The Bilderberg Post then makes its proposal.
In fact there are steps the United States and its allies could take to head off the conflagration Ms. Rice describes — or at least to temper it. They are not guaranteed to succeed, but they are more likely to bring about the demise of the Assad regime, to prevent sectarian conflict and to stop a regional war. They also will do more to protect vital U.S. interests than a policy of passivity.[source : What the U.S. should do about Syria, Washington Post, http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/what-the-us-should-do-about-syria/2012/05/31/gJQAaeTW5U_story.html, 01/06/2012]
The first of these would be to recruit a coalition to create safe zones along and eventually inside Syria’s borders with Turkey and perhaps Jordan, close U.S. allies that already harbor tens of thousands of Syrian refugees. These areas could be defended by air power or by a modest force of Turkish troops; the Turkish government has expressed support for safe zones. With only a handful of loyal military units, the Assad regime would be hard-pressed to challenge the zones while maintaining control over the rest of the country. They could become an area where opposition forces could organize and train, with the help and influence of Western governments. Some experts believe that their very creation could cause the regime to crumble; at a minimum, many civilian lives could be saved.
See what I mean?
Will the USA creating safe zones inside Syria where the FSA can train to kill Syrian military "stop a regional war"?
This is such a desperate suggestion bordering on lunacy.
Syria would clearly attack such zones. If Turkey is protecting those zones then Turkish troops would no doubt die. Turkey would then cite The Washington Treaty, probably Clause 5, and NATO would then intervene. Then Russia would no doubt join in.
No. Do not create safe zones for lying child-murdering terrorists to train in.
STOP ARMING AND FINANCING THEM!
DOES MARK LYALL-GRANT HAVE A BRAIN?
Mark Lyall-Grant is the British Ambassador to the United Nations. Yesterday there was a closed UN Security Council briefing on Syria. Lyall-Grant came out of the meeting and admitted that there were terrorist gangs operating in Syria, but questioned why have they only become so public recently?
Here is what Lyall-Grant said directly after that meeting.
DUH!
BECAUSE IN APRIL THEY GOT $100 MILLION DOLLARS FROM THE FREEDOM-LOVING ABSOLUTE MONARCHIES OF SAUDI ARABIA AND QATAR!
But most sickening of all, they also got "non lethal" assistance from Hasty Hague.
That assistance is not looking so "non lethal" now, is it?
The Press TV report states that there is now a wide recognition that terrorists are now operating in Syria, something that has not been acknowledged and reported in NATO media.
The reporter for Press TV, Hank Flynn, says this.
Maybe those innocent children did not die in vain. Perhaps the plan of the NATO death squads and their media has backfired, and instead of causing more mass slaughter from a military intervention their sickening deaths have woken up a lot of people, the kind of people who NATO do not want waking up.
I see this as very, very, very significant and a victory for truth.
Here is what Lyall-Grant said directly after that meeting.
Yes. There are clearly terrorist elements at work in Syria. But why is that the case. That was not the case several months ago.[source : UN officials acknowledge armed gangs' role in Syria unrest, PressTV, http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2012/05/31/243895/un-armed-gangs-syria/, 31/05/2012]
DUH!
BECAUSE IN APRIL THEY GOT $100 MILLION DOLLARS FROM THE FREEDOM-LOVING ABSOLUTE MONARCHIES OF SAUDI ARABIA AND QATAR!
But most sickening of all, they also got "non lethal" assistance from Hasty Hague.
That assistance is not looking so "non lethal" now, is it?
The Press TV report states that there is now a wide recognition that terrorists are now operating in Syria, something that has not been acknowledged and reported in NATO media.
British Ambassador Mark Lyall Grant must have heard a mouthful in a closed-door UN Security Council briefing on Wednesday.
When he emerged -- he went a long way toward acknowledging that armed gangs are killing civilians and sowing chaos in Syria -- even if he says they're only recently engaged.
UN officials from Special Envoy Kofi Annan to Peacekeeping chief Herve Ladsous have acknowledged the deadly role that armed gangs are playing.
The reporter for Press TV, Hank Flynn, says this.
More diplomats than ever, even Western ones, are finally beginning to see the deadly havoc caused by armed gangs in Syria.
Maybe those innocent children did not die in vain. Perhaps the plan of the NATO death squads and their media has backfired, and instead of causing more mass slaughter from a military intervention their sickening deaths have woken up a lot of people, the kind of people who NATO do not want waking up.
I see this as very, very, very significant and a victory for truth.
FATHER OF LITVINENKO ACCUSES BEREZOVSKY AND GOLDFARB
This is a very badly timed news item, coming among the news about Houla and Bilderberg, but still highly significant nonetheless.
The father of Alexander Litvinenko, Walter, has formally accused Boris Berezovsky and Alexander Goldfarb of the murder of his son. He has made this formal accusation to Scotland Yard. The evidence that Walter says he has is a note written by his son just before he died. The note lists the names of Berezovsky and Goldfarb.
Murder?
Or smuggling accident?
What exactly did the note say?
The father of Alexander Litvinenko, Walter, has formally accused Boris Berezovsky and Alexander Goldfarb of the murder of his son. He has made this formal accusation to Scotland Yard. The evidence that Walter says he has is a note written by his son just before he died. The note lists the names of Berezovsky and Goldfarb.
Murder?
Or smuggling accident?
What exactly did the note say?
[source : ‘Berezovsky killed my son’, Litvinenko’s dad tells Scotland Yard, RT, http://www.rt.com/news/berezovsky-litvinenko-murder-allegations-662/, 31/05/2012]
The father of Aleksandr Litvinenko, who was killed by Polonium-210 poison in London in 2006, has told British investigators whom he believes was behind the crime. He named Litvinenko’s former boss Boris Berezovsky and one of his associates.
The allegations are part of a video report sent to the New Scotland yard by Valter Litvinenko, who currently lives in Italy. RT has received a copy of the tape.
SERIOUS LACK OF FILM OF HOULA SLAUGHTER
Why are there so many films available showing the rows of dead men, women and children captured only THE DAY AFTER it is alleged by the FSA and their supporters in Taldao that the local militia slaughtered them, but there is only one film that is alleged to show shelling by the Syrian military? And that one raises some serious questions about men carrying RPGs?
According to some of the witnesses that Alex Thomson spoke to (who cannot agree on what happened), the shelling lasted for several hours followed by local militia in military fatigues, in broad daylight, in a FSA stronghold, slaughtering children for hours upon end and nobody, not even the FSA in a FSA stronghold, tried to stop them.
And nobody thought of filming it?
Not one single member of the FSA?
They only thought of filming the rows of dead men, women and children the day after?
Hmm.
Another nail in the coffin of the NATO media narrative, perhaps?
Look. The dead were supporters of Assad. The methods used to kill them indicate the perps were Sunni terrorists (and we all know who is sponsoring them). Such terrorists have bragged about employing such methods in their executions of Assad supporters. The UN has, for whatever reason, only taken evidence from FSA and anti-Assad people, and by phone, and from another continent. They cannot get their stories straight and have not idenitified any one individual, but use the sweeping generalisation 'local militia' bearing Shia slogans and wearing masks. And their general narrative, that local militia and Syrian military shelled Taldao, which is a FSA stronghold, for hours and then walked the streets of Taldao, in broad daylight, in military fatigues, and slaughtered children for hours upon end, and nobody filmed it, or stopped them has zero credibility.
A much more credible narrative is, as the Syrian government is showing, that the families were murdered because they supported Assad and the whole sad episode was designed to provoke calls for a military intervention of some kind by NATO or the USA or another coalition.
But I would take it one step further and suggest that the war on Syria is just one of a series of wars on seven nations in five years, which was revealed to General Wesley Clark shortly after the inside job 9/11, which is itself designed to provoke a WW3 between the USA on one side and Russia and China on the other, the purpose of which is to implement a despotic satanic fascist world government dictatorship that would begin to openly reduce population levels down to somewhere between a half billion and one billion.
According to some of the witnesses that Alex Thomson spoke to (who cannot agree on what happened), the shelling lasted for several hours followed by local militia in military fatigues, in broad daylight, in a FSA stronghold, slaughtering children for hours upon end and nobody, not even the FSA in a FSA stronghold, tried to stop them.
And nobody thought of filming it?
Not one single member of the FSA?
They only thought of filming the rows of dead men, women and children the day after?
Hmm.
Another nail in the coffin of the NATO media narrative, perhaps?
Look. The dead were supporters of Assad. The methods used to kill them indicate the perps were Sunni terrorists (and we all know who is sponsoring them). Such terrorists have bragged about employing such methods in their executions of Assad supporters. The UN has, for whatever reason, only taken evidence from FSA and anti-Assad people, and by phone, and from another continent. They cannot get their stories straight and have not idenitified any one individual, but use the sweeping generalisation 'local militia' bearing Shia slogans and wearing masks. And their general narrative, that local militia and Syrian military shelled Taldao, which is a FSA stronghold, for hours and then walked the streets of Taldao, in broad daylight, in military fatigues, and slaughtered children for hours upon end, and nobody filmed it, or stopped them has zero credibility.
A much more credible narrative is, as the Syrian government is showing, that the families were murdered because they supported Assad and the whole sad episode was designed to provoke calls for a military intervention of some kind by NATO or the USA or another coalition.
But I would take it one step further and suggest that the war on Syria is just one of a series of wars on seven nations in five years, which was revealed to General Wesley Clark shortly after the inside job 9/11, which is itself designed to provoke a WW3 between the USA on one side and Russia and China on the other, the purpose of which is to implement a despotic satanic fascist world government dictatorship that would begin to openly reduce population levels down to somewhere between a half billion and one billion.
ONLY SATAN WOULD CUT THE THROATS OF INNOCENT CHILDREN
This is the inverted, irregular and incomplete pentagram that is north of, and points south into, the White House in Washington, D.C.
This is the most satanic symbol.
To reinforce this satanic symbolism in Washington D.C there is also a 13 layer pyramid with the owl Moloch sitting on top with the Capitol inside its stomach. There is also a Moloch owl at Bohemian Grove, in front of which a mock human sacrifice occurs every summer when the worlds most rich and powerful gather together and get upto God knows what. Children were sacrificed to Moloch.
This is the kind of cabal that would cut the throats of innocent children. And if they can't do it themselves then they would employ terrorists to do it for them.
And they have...in Taldou, Houla.
These things, these creatures, these unhumans, who attend BeHomo Grove and Bilderberg etc., they engineer and finance world wars. The slaughter of children in Taldou is nothing to these things, particularly if it would lead to a world war to destroy nation states and deliver the planet to a satanic global tyranny that would commit further slaughter and reduce the human population to 1 billion as recommended by the UN and Club of Rome, possibly just 500 million if the Georgia Guidestones are to be believed.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)