Why is that?
Does this front page and very public Osborne/Rothschild falling out show that Bilderberg is extremely important to them?
Is Osborne being punished so publicly because he has attended Bilderberg several times, a meeting at which secrets are supposed to remain secrets, yet Osborne is blabbering secrets from a private Rothschild meeting, so can he really be trusted with Bilderberg secrets?
That Nat Rothschild wrote a letter to The Times also indicates to me that he is not of "the right stuff" either, dragging his name and others into the public arena, threatening court cases over such trivial matters, when compared to the shit his family has dumped onto the planet.
Cheezus, we just bailed the banks out for £500 billion with little questioning from the media, yet the same media which is so silent on Bilderberg is going crazy over the minor and comaparatively trivial details of this one Rothschild private meeting.
We have to ask why.
No comments:
Post a Comment