That is the argument put forth by George
[Britain's cold snap does not prove climate science wrong
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/blog/2010/jan/06/cold-snap-climate-sceptics]
Yes it is correct that just because it snows does not mean that global warming is not happening. But regarding this current deep freeze the government office that has been pushing the theory of AGW did not predict the occurence or depth or length of the big deep freeze, now 4 weeks long.
So why should we trust the prediction of that same office when it says that unless we slash CO2 emissions then in 20 to 30 years the world will boil?
If you went to a fortune teller who told you that you would win the lottery at the weekend but you didn't, would you believe that same fortune teller when he or she told you that in 20 to 30 years you would have won the lottery 5 times?
It is a question of trust.
The Meteorological Office has attempted to predict the climate of three different seasons, and got them spectacularly wrong. By using the words like "mild" the MO is describing the climate, not specific weather events but the general overall climate of those seasons.
So the MO can be compared to a fortune teller because neither does not apparently use science, otherwise the MO would have got it right not wrong!
But I also didn't hear George say these kind of things about unique weather events when snow was not involoved, such as in 2003 and 2007.
The point of my argument that AGW is bollock is this;
1. the theory of AGW has been pushed by The Meteorological Office
2. The MO markets itself as providing accurate weather forecasts
3. The MO can predict the weather accurately, but generally only for the next one or two days, but rarely are its forecasts for a few days in advance correct
4. The MO has recently made attempts to predict the climate of three seasons, in which all three forecasts were for higher than usual temperatures and all three forecasts were laughably incorrect
6. The MO predicted a mild winter, and even when the first snows fell four weeks ago did not predict the length and depth of the deep freeze we all suffered, hence the shortage of salt and grit and failure of transport systems
7. The MO is run by a former head of the WWF-UK with interests in several green organisations that could have done well in a carbon-trading industry
8. the WWF has very deep Nazi roots despite its apparent greenness (perhaps their logo should be a green swastika)
9. before Copenhagen HM Queen demanded that her 'Commonwealth' sign up to slash CO2 emissions which would have seriously decreased their economic output and brought mass genocide to their nations
10. at Copenhagen Prince Charles demanded the same of every nation in order to 'save the planet'
11. at Copenhagen a report from the Optimum Population Trust was handed to every nation that stated that the best and cheapest way to reduce carbon emissions is to kill people
12. Prince Philip, co-founder of the WWF, after his death wants to come back as a deadly virus to reduce human population
13. just before Copenhagen a collection of data was hacked from the UEA CRU which clearly indicated that the theory of AGW had been sexed-up with manipulation and deletion of data and unscientific bias in research citation. This event known as Climategate has not been investigated by any MSM journalists, who have continued to parrot the mantra "Man made global warming - we will exterminate"
14. an attempt at creating and funding more world government was made at Copenhagen, but failed
15. another goal at Copenhagen was the establishment of a massive system for trading in carbon which would no doubt have been controlled by the same banks that caused and profited from the current financial crisis
16. the one goal that was achieved at Copenhagen was the creation of a Climate Fund that is to be controlled by a Bilderberger in control of a key institution in the World Government apparatus, The World Bank
When you cut through the hippie green bullshit you are left with mass genocide, world government and scientific corruption.
There is nothing wrong with recycling etc but to establish a genocidal tyrannical world government is unnecessary and unwanted.
No comments:
Post a Comment