Monday, January 11, 2010

IF SWINE FLU THREAT WAS EXAGGERATED WHY NOT TERRORISM?

It looks like the threat from Swine Flu was exaggerated.

Wolfgang Wodarg, head of health at the Council of Europe, accused the makers of flu drugs and vaccines of influencing the World Health Organisation's decision to declare a pandemic.

This led to the pharmaceutical firms ensuring 'enormous gains', while countries, including the UK, 'squandered' their meagre health budgets, with millions being vaccinated against a relatively mild disease.

[source : The 'false' pandemic: Drug firms cashed in on scare over swine flu, claims Euro health chief, The Daily Mail 11/01/2010]

Of course the NHS can always make up for this by killing a few more little old grannies...

But seriously, this report should be taken in hand with the allegations about who knew what and when about the Christmas Day Blazing Underpants Bomber and the corruption of the Meteorological Office.

Regarding the Christmas Day Blazing Underpants Bomber, they knew and let him on board and then terrified the world with yet more terrorism from the ghostly al-Qaeda to distract from the predictable failure at Copenhagen.

Regarding the corruption of the Meteorological Office, whenever it has tried to predict the climate of a season in the last 18 months it has failed spectacularly, and it may have been forced to predict a mild winter recently because it has been exaggerating the threat of AGW and predicting a freezing cold winter just before Copenhagen would not have looked good.

So there you have it. Threats of terrorism, global warming, WMDs etc are all exaggerated to influence public policy, implement war, mass genocide and global government and to make a massive profit at the same time.

Have a nice day!

No comments: