WHAT'S RUSSIAN FOR FISHY?

There is something very fishy about this review of the case against Khordokovsky, with it being announced, as most of Russia was celebrating, immediately after Putin was formally announced the President elect.

Very fishy indeed.

Has a deal of some sort been struck? Is so, then between whom?

I also think WW3 is more likely with Putin if we do not stop our own warmongering leaders. He is more likely to stand up against NATO warmongering while Medvedev would roll over on his back and let NATO tickle his tummy-wummy. But if Putin begins to create a strong anti-NWO alliance then that may convince the NWO the game is up.

When something isn't right it's wrong. And it's not right. Not yet anyway.

There is something fishy.

Look what they went through to get Iraq, the world's second largest proven oil reserves, so coveted by oil men like Dick Cheney. They placed their agent Saddam in there in the 1960s. He became leader in a coup. He then bought WMD off us. He used them during the war with Iran. Then we tricked him into invading Kuwait, and just before kicking him out in Desert Storm we betrayed a revolution that we encouraged against him which he put down brutally and he became stronger internally. We then imposed sanctions against Iraq and bombed it with DU for a decade. We then accused Iraq of doing 9/11 and of having WMD (which we sold to him). We then invaded Iraq (again), which was severely weakened after a decade long war with Iran and a second decade of sanctions and DU bombs. We then hung what could or could not have been Saddam. And we now control Iraqi oil.

Now that is deep deep cover.

We need to know what was discussed between Putin and Kissinger in 2007 after the radioactive and photogenic death of the traitor (as his own father now calls him) Alexander Litvinenko.