JIHADI HAGUE IS ONTO A LOSER AGAIN

Last year, William Jihadi Hague fell for the bullshit that was initially put out by the Syrian rebels about the massacre at al Houla in which well over 100 Syrian civilians were slaughtered. The rebels blamed Shabiha from surrounding villages. But after a few days a much clearer picture emerged of what really happened. It turned out that most of the dead were members of just two families, who were Sunni (like most of the rebels) but pro Assad/anti-rebel. For that they paid with their lives, children included.

Hague is falling for the bullshit again.

In a news interview today, Hague has again accused Assad of another massacre using chemical weapons. Hague "believes" Assad did it, and wants the UN inspectors to go in to investigate asap because "the evidence will deteriorate over a matter of days."

He also has a go at conspiracy theorists.

Now I know that some people in the world would like to say this is some kind of conspiracy brought about by the opposition in Syria. I think the chances of that are vanishingly small and so we do believe that this is a chemical attack by the Assad regime on a large scale. But we would like the United Nations to be able to assess that, so that for those who don’t believe that, for those who doubt, the evidence can be gathered. But that is certainly our opinion.

[source : Foreign Secretary: UN must get access to chemical attack site, FCO, https://www.gov.uk/government/news/foreign-secretary-un-must-get-access-to-chemical-attack-site, 23rd August 2013]

Hague uses the "if they have nothing to hide then they have nothing to fear" argument, the same argument he and his ilk use to implement intrusive police state policies.

And Hague, despite telling us of his belief, does not provide a reason why Assad would do this, and at this time.

But Hague also had this to say:

This is not something that a humane or civilised world can ignore. Our priority is to make sure the world knows the facts of what has happened and that means the UN team that is in Damascus, only 20 minutes travel away, being able to get there and to investigate.

A humane or civilised world would not send cutthroat Jihadis into Syria, but someone did, and Cameron must have given some kind of green light because the former French foreign minister Roland Dumas told LCP that in 2009 he was asked by British officials to help plan how to get such rebels into Syria.

The UN team that is "only 20 minutes travel away" is in Syria to investigate three previous allegations of chemical weapons used, one of which has been shown by Russia to have been committed by the rebels, who then returned to the scene of their crime to eliminate all eyewitnesses in a massacre of 120 civilians at Khan al Assal.

Last week when I heard that the King of Saudi Arabia was calling for Egypt to oppress the Muslim Brotherhood, accusing them of terrorism and destabilisation, I knew something was going down. I then learned that the Saudi Foreign Minister had visited France to meet with Hollande, who after the meeting swiftly changed his initial opposition to the oppression of the MB to support.

There is some kind of trap being set here. If Assad doesn't let the UN investigators to inspect this latest allegation then there may be a move by the DFQ, France, etc to withdraw the UN investigation team altogether and the three attacks that they were supposed to investigate do not get investigated and the rebels' complicity cannot be proven by the UN. But if Assad does let them in then we know what the DFQ is like. They will refuse to acknowledge any other conclusion than Assad did it, and launch some kind of attack, even if film is found of the rebels handling the bomb, firing it and shouting Allah U Akbar as hundreds die in agony.

Assad has stood up to the Zioimperialists for well over two years. The Syrian Arab Army is on the verge of a glorious victory. Killing over 1000 of his own people now would be suicidal for Assad. It would give the Zioimperialists the casus belli to attack Syria directly. Assad also has 70% of the Syrian people supporting him, 20% are neutral and just 10%, for whatever perverted reason, support the rebels. Hague refuses to see this in The Twisted Little World of Hague. To Hague the rebels are killer angels.

Bandar bin Sultan is the prime suspect. He said he was going to unleash hell on earth in Syria. If the result of whatever occured on Wednesday, shown in many pictures as Hague himself recognises, is not hell, then I don't know what is.

Arrest Bandar bin Sultan. If not for Wednesday's events then for 9/11.