WHY WOULD ASSAD USE CHEMICAL WEAPONS?

The NATO media has been relentless in its recalling of President Obama stating last year that the use of chemical weapons by Assad would cross a red line and change his calculus.

So let's look at what has happened since then.

In September last year there was a tragic event in Benghazi, Libya in which Ambassador Stevens was murdered. Obama was immediately blamed. However, a few months earlier it was decided at the Bilderberg meeting that Romney would be the next President of the United States of America. The event in Benghazi was designed to Carterize Obama, to make him look weak and ineffectual. A few weeks later there was a drastic culling of high ranking military personnel. It looked Obama had destroyed a potential coup. Romney was a good personal friend of Israeli PM Netanyahu. As President, Romney would have implemented fascism and also attacked Syria and Iran.

After Christmas a series of scandals began to emerge, all implicating Obama personally. At the same time there was tremendous pressure put on Obama to intervene in Syria. There were allegations that Assad had used chemical weapons, and that he ordered an attack in Turkey. The accusers were the usual suspects: Cameron, Netanyahu, Erdogan. There were also calls for Obama to resign, or to impeach Obama. These would have resulted in self-confessed Zionist Biden becoming President. All this occured as the Syrian Arab Army assisted by Hezbollah began to destroy the cutthroat Jihadis, with stunning victory after stunning victory, culminating in the glorious victory of the liberation of al Qusair. In response the cutthroats massacred whole Christian villages such as al Duvair.

A few months ago the USA finally said that it believed that Assad had used chemical weapons and promised more aid to the rebels. But as yet there is little sign that that aid has been provided. One of the alleged massacres by chemical weapons occured at Khan al Assal, but Russia has shown that the cutthroats did that. The cutthroats then returned to the scene of their crime and massacred every living thing so that there were no survivors to testify to the UN investigators who are now in Syria.

And in an act of desperation, under the guidance of William Jihadi Hague, Bonesman John Kerry attempted a soft coup at a Principals Committee Meeting and tried to persuade CJCS Dempsey to attack Syria.

So it is blatantly obvious that
1. there is an international effort to drag the USA into attacking Syria
2. President Obama has been reluctant to acquiesce.

The current situation in Syria is that
1. the Syrian Arab Army is on the verge of a glorious victory
2. President Assad has the very high and still rising support of the Syrian people
3. many members of the Free Syria Army are accepting the amnesty offered by Assad because they now realise that the 'uprising' in Syria was in reality an invasion by foreign terrorists financed from abroad

With this evidence before you, why would President Assad suddenly decide to use chemical weapons to kill approximately 1000 Syrian civilians, and thus risk losing the support he has from the Syrian people and provide the casus belli for the warmongers to persuade President Obama to attack Syria?

Nobody has provided any credible reason as to why Assad would do this, and why now? Nobody. Cameron. Hague. Hollande. Fabius. Netanyahu. Kerry.

NOBODY!

Why? Because there is no reason for him to do so.

President Obama has so far been very, very wise to have refused to attack Syria.

He would be very, very wise to refuse now.

The evidence is mounting that the rebels, Bandar's Bandits, the NATO proxy cutthroat Jihadi terrorist scum, planned and then executed the horrific events of Wednesday 21st August 2013 in a desperate attempt to trick President Obama into attacking Syria. This would concur with reports that Bandar bin Sultan of the utopia of freedom, democracy and human rights, The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, was soon going to unleash hell on earth in Syria, and also in Lebanon.

Only the rebels and their backers have benefited from the horrific events of Wednesday.

An attack on Syria would probably fulfill the plan for three world wars that this blog has been consistently suggesting has been the blueprint for modern history.