TARGETS

They don't know where any Syrian chemical weapons are.

So does that give Cameron the right to attack any 'suspected' site that 'may' have held, 'may be' holding, or 'could' hold Syrian chemical weapons?

Indeed, what is the definition of a 'target'? A fuel dump?

If so then this would give Cameron and Hague the cover to attack the Syrian Arab Army in general. The only beneficiary of such an attack would be the NATO proxy cutthroat Jihadi terrorist scum. Such an attack would not immediately depose Assad, but it would alter the balance of power in favour of the rebels and continue the throat cutting for months. But if left to do the job, the Syrian Arab Army could crush the rebels within a month or two, particularly if support for the rebels is stopped (as it should be).

If Cameron and Hague had indisputable proof that Assad had used chemical weapons last Wednesday then we would have been shown it. Instead we have been provided with a 'judgement' by a committee that has a track record of lying, and whose Chairman is usually a Sir, Dame, or CBE, as the current Chairman is. The report provided by that committee contains this big, big lie:

There is no credible intelligence or other evidence to substantiate the claims or the possession of CW by the opposition. The JIC has therefore concluded that there are no plausible alternative scenarios to regime responsibility.

...There is no credible evidence that any opposition group has used CW.

Both Russia and Carla del Ponte have made the most serious accusation against the rebels using chemical weapons. As a result of one of these accusations the rebels massacred 120 civilians at Khan al Assal. The UN investigators were in Syria to investigate this. Instead the UN investigators have been led into investigating last week's events, which Cameron, Obama, Hollande, Netanyahu etc have already concluded, without any UN report, is due to Assad.

But even the committee cannot find a logical explanation for Assad using chemical weapons:

There is no obvious political or military trigger for regime use of CW on an apparently larger scale now, particularly given the current presence in Syria of the UN investigation team.

The reason the committee believes Assad used chemical weapons last week is because of the scale:

It is not possible for the opposition to have carried out a CW attack on this scale. The regime has used CW on a smaller scale on at least 14 occasions in the past. There is some intelligence to suggest regime culpability in this attack. These factors make it highly likely that the Syrian regime was responsible.

I remain unconvinced of the evidence provided thus far by the government.

I remain convinced that Assad and the Syrian Arab Army are innocent of all charges, and that the most likely culprit or culprits are a faction within the opposition, who are facing imminent defeat and desperately need NATO intervention to degrade the Syrian Arab Army and demoralise the Syrian people.