Obama was not supposed to win the election last year. Romney and his pro-Israel pro-fascist policies were. Romney was picked at Bilderberg 2012, and subsequently received ten times as much money from Wall Street than Obama did. With this knowledge we should look at Benghazi in a different light, particularly now that the man in charge of the CIA at the time, David Petraeus, has just been awarded a cushy job with KKR who are ever present at Bilderberg. Was it to Carterize Obama, to make him look weak and Romney strong? I believe so.
The plan for war on seven nations in five years, as revealed to General Wesley Clark shortly after the mother of inside Saudijobs, 9/11, is seriously, seriously, seriously behind schedule. Obama reluctantly bombed Libya, and has just dodged World War 3 over Syria. There is also a real possibility of a deal with Iran.
What has been the result of this recent diplomacy? Hardly any cheers. Instead, Saudi Arabia and Israel, both bloodsoaked 'jewels' in the British crown, are furious! Absolutely livid! So much so that Saudi Arabia is making veiled threats against the USA, implementing its own warmongering policies, while Israel is once again prepared to go it alone and attack Iran itself.
The second Obama presidency began in controversy, over Benghazi.
But that was merely an Hors d'oeuvre.
There began a series of scandals, all implicating Obama directly. This, I believe, was to pressure Obama into attacking Syria. No such pressure would be needed to influence Romney. Then began the allegations that Assad was behind atrocity after atrocity, using chemical weapons against Syrian civilians, and driving car bombs over the border into Turkey. There were face to face meetings with Netanyahu, Erdogan and Cameron. They all pleaded with Obama to attack Syria, because the cutthroat Jihadis were being annihilated.
But still Obama resisted.
And then...the Pièce de résistance.
Ed Snowden arrived on the scene just days after the Syrian Arab Army captured the important hub of al Qusair. Snowden's claims all implicated Obama in invading our privacy, personally reading all our emails, texts, tweets, blogs, etc. Most of the alternative media crowd were shocked. SHOCKED! Yet this crowd were surely aware of the Echelon system exposed years earlier, and should have expected that such a system would have evolved with the rise of social media?
But the public outrage caused Obama to U-turn and declare that Assad had crossed Obama's red line and used chemical weapons. However, Russia showed the UN that, in fact, the rebels had used them. So the rebels went in and slaughtered every living thing, including soldiers of the Syrian Arab Army, so there was no one left alive to testify to the UN who had used chemical weapons. Obama announced an increase in the quantity of weapons for the rebels.
But still no attack on Syria.
And so, on 21st August it was reported that Assad had used chemical weapons to kill over a thousand Syrian civilians. The usual suspects immediately blamed Assad, and demanded that the USA attack Syria. The logic that Assad would use chemical weapons was hardly addressed. That Israeli source of total bullshit, Debkafile, tried to pin it on Assad's brother, Maher, but did not provide any proof.
But Ed Miliband pressed the pause button which gave Obama the time to think and agree a diplomatic solution without any investigation into who really had used chemical weapons.
The UK, Saudi Arabia, Israel and France are furious with Obama.
Obama has shown some strength in resisting the Anglo-American-Saudi-Israeli Axis of Evil and their desire for total war. They have a motive in isolating Obama, to make him look ridiculous and incapable of governing.
Billy Connolly came up with 'the fart in the space suit' analogy. This last week has seen Obama look isolated over the NSA spying revelations, and incapable of governing following the Obamacare roll out.
All I am saying is that there are lots of very powerful people who are furious with Obama for not attacking Syria. I do not trust Snowden: his background is dodgy and he has lied about his qualifications; his information is not that explosive; he supports Ron Paul; he came into the public arena at a perfect time to embarrass Obama into attacking Syria; and the conduit for his claims, The Guardian, has made some very dubious alliances, in supporting Rothschild-loving Mikhail Khordokovsky and in supporting mass genocide at Copenhagen in 2009.
No comments:
Post a Comment