For well over a year we have been told that The Snowden 'Revelations' are damaging national security, yet well over a year after they were first reported we can still find them reported on the front pages of the megaphone of Bilderberg The Washington Post, and/or the NATO media flagship The Guardian, while the man entrusted with reporting those 'revelations' boasts that after well over a year of first breaking the 'revelations' he is still sitting on NSA bombshells while finding the time to sign lucrative contracts!
So what does this article state that is so interesting?
It seems highly unlikely that a British paedophile would be a member of an American paedophile group but not its British equivalent. Thatcher would have been very keen to avoid another high profile scandal involving Establishment paedophiles and national security. It was only two years since senior diplomat Sir Peter Hayman had been outed as a paedophile and PIE member, and only a year since the Elm Guest House paedophile scandal had broken with the headline ‘Security Alert in New Vice Scandal’.
Sir Michael Havers had intervened on both occasions. He defended the decision not to prosecute Sir Peter Hayman, and he “was called in to examine complaints” against several British newspapers by Elm Guest House’s lawyers. The papers never reported on Elm Guest House again after the initial ten days, effectively burying the story and allowing the paedophile network’s activities to continue without being bothered by press coverage.
[source : http://spotlightonabuse.wordpress.com/tag/mi6/, Accessed 9th July 2014]
Allegations of paedophilia in Whiltehall were enough of a threat to national security to lead to Attorney General Sir Michael Havers having a word with the newspapers and the allegations were never heard of again. From the story breaking to the newspapers being told to shut it took just 10 days.
Yet here we are, well over a year after The Snowden 'Revelations' first broke and we can still read more and more 'revelations' on the front pages of the establishment newspapers!
I have other very good arguments as to why The Snowden 'Revelations' are a psyop, but the main ones are:
1. The NATO and Russian media will not report The Clark Revelations;
2. Anyone with any sort of awareness of what is going on only appears in the NATO media to be ridiculed, while Snowden believes the official 9/11 fairytale;
3. The three stooges sobbed that Snowden was aiding the enemy when MI5 allowed Adebalajo to preach Jihad against Syria.
And for the record, Baroness Butler-Sloss cannot run that inquiry because of a massive conflict of interest.
No comments:
Post a Comment