THE CORBETT REPORT : THE WW1 CONSPIRACY

Not bad. Not bad at all. I hadn't heard of one reference (or if I had I had forgotten it) - The Two Edwards : How King Edward VII and Sir Edward Grey Fomented World War One - but it could well provide more damning evidence to back my belief that it was those two Edwards who should share the blame for WW1.

There is one glaring omission in the video though. Corbett appears to be blaming Cecil Rhodes and The Round Table. But the top Freemason in the world was King Edward VII, who died in 1910. When he died his brother Arthur, Duke of Connaught, took over that role. In 1913 the Freemasons said they were going to assassinate Arch Duke Ferdinand. In June 1914 a gang, some of whom were Freemasons, assassinated Ferdinand. After this assassination, Sir Edward Grey played Europe, leaving them guessing as to Britain's position. King George V even told the German Monarchy that he saw no reason for Britain to become embroiiled in a war. This all led Germany and Russia to mobilise until neither would pull back and risk losing face. As soon as everyone had declared war on each other King George V ordered Grey to get Britain into the war. And in his memoirs Kaiser Wilhelm II wrote that he was told by a distinguished Freemason that Freemasonry engineered the war.

This is not in the video.

Corbett appears to be blaming only Rhodes and The Round Table.

This video by The Corbett report is good, in that it does expose a conspiracy, but not the full conspiracy, the Royal one.

The facts are that a unified Germany was co-operating with the USA (whose economy was about to overtake Great Britain's) and Russia to build land-based trade routes beyond the range and control of the powerful British Navy. This would allow them and their allies and even neutrals to trade with each other without interference from the British.

Yes, Britain saw it was doomed so it engineered a world war so its main competitors would destroy each other, and make it more likely that they would join a post-war world government under British control. But there was more to it than just a unified Germany, as Corbett suggests.

I hope that Part 2 exposes how and why the Zionists kept the war going for 2 more years when we should have had peace.

Otherwise we could consider The Corbett Report a gatekeeper.