No, not the private war I'm having with a particular family from North West England (which is a war that I didn't start). I'm referring to the film about Marie Colvin.
It's sick. In many ways.
But the main aspect is that it does not refer to the plan for war and regime change in 7 countries in 5 years as revealed to General Wesley Clark shortly after 9/11 (which was engineered by the Anglo-American-Zionist Empah to kick off those wars).
The general point of the film, or so it has been advertised, is that war is bad and killing journalists who cover war is bad.
But as stated, the plan revealed to Clark is never mentioned. Nor is the assistance given to the international cutthroat Jihadis from the likes of UK, USA, Israel, etc.
You know. The ones driving Brexit...
Oh, and on Colvin's assistant Conroy?
Read this: "Journalist" Paul Conroy is MI6 operative
So what does that make Colvin, the 'great' journalist who never mentioned the plan for war and regime change revealed to General Wesley Clark?
And who did Colvin work for?
The Sunday Times.
And who owned The Sunday Times?
Rupert Murdoch.
And who are partners in Genie Energy who want The Golan Heights for its natural resources?
Murdoch, Lord Jacob Rothschild, Dick Cheney, ....
The usual scum.
No comments:
Post a Comment