Things to note:
1. why go to Hong Kong and not Gaza where Palestinians are being killed or maimed or used as lab rats?
2. who paid for the Hong Kong trip?
3. why is DC the 1st place Watson goes to after home?
4. where is Hong Kong anyway? (Clue: mainland China and until 1997 was British only coz of the British and Americans foisting opium onto China during the 19th Century, and HSBC was established to facilitate the opium trade).
Not that I'm promoting China. But let's get a sense of perspective.
Gaza is being stolen. There is ethnic cleansing going on in Gaza after the British betrayed the Palestinians. Palestinians, including babies and children, are being killed and maimed and used as lab rats for Israeli weapons.
Nobody died in Hong Kong. Some tear gas was used. But 1 current Infowars reporter was there, as was 1 former Infowars reporter/editor, Paul Joseph Watson. Alex Jones says Infowars is U S Military Intelligence.
So why were 2 U S Military Intelligence propaganda assets in Hong Kong but none in Gaza?
The initial peaceful protests in Hong Kong were just about extradition and that alone. But as Watson reports, if this is true, the 'protests' have now become violent, reasons for the protests are now many, and a new word has been invented, Chi-Nazis, to describe China.
Chi-Nazis?
Is that a word that the CIA or MI6 would come up with?
Would a peaceful Hong Kong resident think that up? Or would a Hong Kong resident radicalised by the CIA or everyone's favourite U S Military Intelligent propaganda merchant?
I ask again: why is Washington DC the first place that Watson is immediately going to after dropping his stuff at home in London?
And yes, that is the same Washington DC of the Pentagon and is just down the road from Langley.
They could have made it a bit less obvious? Or Watson could have kept his mouth shut?
No comments:
Post a Comment