WHERE IS THE PUBLIC OUTRAGE ON SYRIA?

The Secretary General of The Norwegian Refugee Council, Jan Egeland, has written his first comment on The ZioGuardian's Comment is Free. The focus of his comment is Syria. The title of his comment is, "Where is the public outrage over Syria?" Egeland contrasts the apparent apathy over Syria to the outrage that was provoked over the events in Rwanda and the Balkans in the 1990's.

But has Egeland written his comment in the wrong paper?

Does Egeland believe that The ZioGuardian is the source of all wisdom and truth?

As I have shown on this blog, The ZioGuardian is perhaps the most dangerous weapon that NATO has in its arsenal of psychological weapons against us, the muggins taxpaying British public. Newspapers like The Daily Telegraph, The Times, The Sun, The Daily Mail can all be depended upon to cry for war. But the other three, The Daily Mirror, The Independent and The Guardian, because they are not on the right, and usually not being on the right means being anti-war, then these papers must tread a careful line if they are to call for war. But The Guardian must do this extremely carefully because it is one of the most widely read newspapers on the internet, and has this air of respectability and credibility about it. So if The Guardian calls for war then surely that war is a worthy war? ABSOLUTELY NOT!! I have shown here that The Guardian is a highly suspect newspaper, defending Rothschild agents and defending Israel but attacking Israel's enemies in its editorials.

If The Guardian repeated just 1% of what I write here about Syria then there would be public outrage on Syria. But that outrage would be directed at our ruling establishment who at the least agreed to 9/11 and then used the public outrage over 9/11 to launch a series of wars that was revealed to General Wesley Clark, that series of wars targeting Israel's enemies who were named in A Clean Break, Iraq, Iran, Syria and Lebanon, together with Libya, Sudan and Somalia.

As yet no such 1% has been repeated, and by doing so The Guardian supports and defends the elite 1% and their wars.

Egeland's ignorant comment assists the NATO cause by calling for Russia and Iran to pressure Assad, citing a violation of international law.

The "bad guys" on either side have not lacked the arms to attack or besiege civilians. The regime's army and the most extreme opposition groups access supplies of arms and other support from UN member states every single month. The recipe for reversing a generation of humanitarian advance must be to have the security council applying pressure on all sides to stop violating basic international law. Only when Russia and Iran put real pressure on the regime, and commensurate pressure is put on extremist armed opposition groups by Gulf States, can we end this humanitarian free fall.

[source : Jan Egeland, Where is the public outrage on Syria?, The Guardian, http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/feb/14/syria-public-outrage-horrors, 14th February 2014]

I have to disagree with Egeland. His comment shows his not complete ignorance of the series of wars since 9/11 (he does recognise the support that the cutthroat Jihadis have comes primarily from the Gulf states), but there is still a hell of a lot of naivete. Syria has been invaded by a plague of cutthroat Jihadis in a plan agreed between Israel, the USA and Saudi Arabia. 'The Syrian War', as Egeland calls it, is essentially an undeclared war on Syria by these 3 nations supported by Great Britain, France and Turkey. And that is the true violation of international law that Egeland should be discussing. Syria should be allowed to deal with this illegal invasion by itself, and be allowed to ask for assistance from whoever it likes, be it Russia and/or Iran, to conquer the cutthroat cannibal invaders, BUT AT THE SAME TIME ALL PRESSURE SHOULD BE PLACED ON THE INVADERS AND THEIR SUPPORTERS TO CEASE THIS ILLEGAL UNDECLARED WAR ON SYRIA!

As with Seamus Milne's comments, Egeland's comments serve one purpose and one purpose only; to give The Guardian some anti-war credibility while its editorials and comments from others writers, such as Nick Cohen, support war.

And to add to this danger posed by The Guardian, Douglas Alexander has written a comment in The Guardian.

Alexander immediately blames Assad for all the bloodshed in Syria!!

In every generation there are horrors that define an age and events that scar the global conscience. In Syria's war over 130,000 are already dead and millions more displaced. The country is melting away, the region destabilised and extremism is taking hold. The responsibility for this war lies primarily with Bashar al-Assad, but this conflict also represents the abject failure of the international community to act decisively and collectively. Given the sheer scale of the continued suffering, it is an understandable response to reflect on steps taken, and not taken, over recent years.

[source : Douglas Alexander, Progress in Geneva is slow, but it's still Syria's best chance of peace, The Guardian, http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/feb/13/geneva-slow-syria-best-chance-peace-military-intervention, 13th February 2014]

BUT THIS IS THE SHADOW FOREIGN SECRETARY!!

WITH A FIRST CLASS DEGREE IN MODERN HISTORY!!

What the hell do these history students get taught at university?

Alexander showed some rejection of the agenda by being at the forefront of the move to reject Cameron's motion for war last August. So some recognition of that is deserved.

But as with everything that gets published in The Guardian regarding Syria, Assad is blamed. Assad is the accused. Assad is the firestarter (a twisted firestarter).

And Alexander pushes the agenda by implying that Assad has to go.

So now is the time to establish a much-needed "contact group" to bring all the stakeholders to the table, rather than leaving them free to continue a proxy war. Under the auspices of the UN, such a group would include the US and Russia, but also crucially Iran, Saudi Arabia and Turkey. Only a political transition will end the war but further and immediate action must be taken to ease the suffering.

NO!

NO!

NO!

Last summer NATO had data that suggested that 70% of Syrians supported Assad, 20% were neutral and only 10% supported the rebels. This is why the violence in Syria is in reality an invasion. This is why there are so many 'stakeholders', as Alexander calls them (who are in reality warmongers).

If Assad goes then the illegal warmongers win.

So even though Alexander stopped war on Syria he still pushes the agenda by blaming Assad for the violence and calling for Assad's resignation.

This is why The ZioGuardian is arguably the most dangerous newspaper in the UK. The likes of The Daily Telegraph etc are bona fide warmongers. But in this era of war weariness after Blair's illegal war on Iraq, people could get fooled into thinking that if The Guardian supports a war then that war must be a worthy war.

BILDERBERG BOLLOCKS

Why is the NATO media hyping up Russia's homosexuality laws to the point of hysteria, yet no mention is made of our glorious ally, the diabolical medieval Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, regarding its flogging and possible state execution of gays, or its role in the supply of cutthroat Jihadis in Syria or the patsies for 9/11?

This is The Gay Elephant in the Pink Living Room.

So why is the NATO media hyping up Russia's homosexuality laws to the point of hysteria, yet no mention is made of our glorious ally, the diabolical medieval Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, regarding its flogging and possible state execution of gays, or its role in the supply of cutthroat Jihadis in Syria or the patsies for 9/11?

It is because Putin has done our cowardly warmongering 'leaders' like a kipper, and they are desperate to put whatever pressure they can on him and Russia, even stooping so low as to believe that a snowflake could end Putin's Presidency.

But now that that pink line of attack has been erased, the case of the TV channel Dozhd has now concerned The Washington Post so much that one of their editorials is dedicated to the shunning of Dozhd by the Russian media. The editorial begins:

FROM HIS first days in power, Russian President Vladimir Putin realized that control over television was critical to maintaining his hold over the huge country. Mr. Putin tightened his grip on the major broadcast television stations, wresting the powerful Channel 1 away from the oligarch Boris Berezovsky.

[source : Putin’s knives in the night threaten an independent Russian broadcaster, Editorial, The Washington Post, 14th February 2014]

Our media is far from 'free', and hasn't been free for decades, since at least the second world war, when Operation Mockingbird was implemented, and only a handful of corporations own everything of any significance.

And as for that crook Berezovsky, he was no angel, on the edge of nuclear smuggling rings and engaged in all sorts of dodgy business, and he was possibly murdered because he was planning on returning to Russia. Oh, what tales he could have told! A few days ago it was ruled that The Home Secretary should provide more solid reasons for not holding a public inquiry into the murder of Alexander Litvinenko. Litvinenko was Berezovsky's gofer. I was one of the first to ridicule the suggestion that Russia murdered Litvinenko, and was ridiculed for it. But I too think that the reason given as to why there is no public inquiry into the murder of Litvinenko is flimsy at best. The reason given is to preserve international and trade relations. But for at least 2 years there has been immense pressure applied to Putin to acquiesce to an attack on Syria. Immense. Our NATO leaders are that desperate to attack Syria that they threatened Putin via Prince Bandar bin Sultan that they would unleash hell on earth on Syria to pressure Putin into dumping Assad. What happened in August last year? A massive false flag attack in which the first reports stated that well over 1000 civilians had been killed by chemical weapons. My argument is that, if our leaders are that desperate to oust Assad that they are prepared to run such a false flag attack then surely they would relish the opportunity to lay bare before the world all the slam dunk evidence they have that Russia murdered Litvinenko. Surely such evidence would pressure Putin to acquiesce to an attack on Syria. But whenever an opportunity arises for such evidence to be revealed the British government hides behind some wafer thin argument and their 'evidence' lies in a dark cupboard somewhere in the deep vaults of Whitehall.

That is, if such slam dunk evidence actually exists...

While I am on the subject of Litvinenko, there is still the problem of 3 small objects that were up his arse when he was first admitted to hospital. This was reported in The Independent but was very quickly 'disappeared' down the memory hole, replaced by images of the melting radioactive traitor. But I'vé kept a record of it:

The poison used to attack the former Russian spy Alexander Litvinenko remained unknown last night as doctors searching for a radioactive toxin focused their efforts on pieces of "dense matter" found in his intestines.

The team treating Mr Litvinenko at University College Hospital in central London believe the defector must have knowingly swallowed the three pieces of material which have become lodged in his colon.

X-rays have shown that two of the items are of a similar size to a 2p coin and the other is the shape of a figure "8", according to a hospital source. But it is not yet known whether the three items are linked to Mr Litvinenko's illness, which has left him without a functioning immune system, due to the failure of his bone marrow, and liver damage. Tests are being carried out to identify the pieces of material.

[source : Doctors treating poisoned Russian focus on objects in his colon, The Independent, http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/doctors-treating-poisoned-russian-focus-on-objects-in-his-colon-425435.html, Accessed 23/06/2012, original article published 23rd November 2006]

And that was the last we heard of that.

But back to the WP editorial.

TV Dozhd pushed the boundaries of the permitted with biting satire, talk shows and extensive news coverage of opposition leaders, including Alexei Navalny, as well as the massive street protests against Mr. Putin in 2011 and 2012.

Navalny is the Wall Street candidate, sponsored by the National Endowment for Democracy. And the 'massive street protests', as the WP calls them, was called The White Revolution, just another colour revolution sponsored by the West, like the Rose Revolution in Georgia that brought The Tie Muncher of Tblisi Saakashvili to power who launched an attack on villagers in South Ossetia as they slept in their beds, provoking Russia and hoping to drag the USA into the conflict. Other colour revolutions were Orange in Ukraine, Green in Iran, and a miserable Jasmine in China.

The FT warned Putin not to run in its editorials in early 2011.

And the WP ends so theatrically:

Ostensibly taking offense at the Leningrad poll cynically provides a bit of patriotic cover. But the result is the same: It looks like yet another light in Russia’s democratic struggle — the refreshing openness of TV Dozhd — is about to go dark.

The 'refreshing openness' of Wall Street propaganda?

For decades The Washington Post was owned by a family, the Graham, who were ever present at one of the most secretive meetings in the world, Bilderberg, where no reporter who attends can report on the proceedings or his/her career is finished. The WP was sold last year to Jeff Bezos...A BILDERBERGER!

WHAT.

A.

LOAD.

OF.

BOLLOCKS!!

WHAT IS GOING ON IN SOUTH AFRICA?

What is going on in South Africa?

The CIA World Fact Book has this to say about South Africa:

South Africa is a middle-income, emerging market with an abundant supply of natural resources; well-developed financial, legal, communications, energy, and transport sectors and a stock exchange that is the 15th largest in the world.

black African 79%, white 9.6%, colored 8.9%, Indian/Asian 2.5% (2001 census)

Deaths (per 1000/population) = 17.36 (largest in the world)

Infant mortality rate (Deaths per 1000 live births) = 42.15 (in the top quarter)

Life expectancy at birth (in Years) = 49.48 (222 out of 223, i.e. almost lowest in the world, with only Chad lower)

Deaths from AIDS = 310000 (2009)

Unemployment rate = 49.8 (2011) (5th highest in the world)

Exports : China 11.8%, US 8.3%, Japan 6%, Germany 5.7%, India 4.2% (2012)

Imports : China 14.4%, Germany 10.1%, Saudi Arabia 7.7%, US 7.4%, Japan 4.6%, India 4.5% (2012)

[source : The CIA World Fact Book, https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/sf.html]

The United Nations Human Development Index ranks South Africa as 121, number 1 being Norway.

So South Africa has an abundant supply of natural resources, and a fantastic legal system, yet the highest death rate in the world from AIDS, which I assume contributes to the high infant mortality rate and the low life expectancy. And despite this abundance of natural resources it is ranked only 121 in the world.

What is going on in South Africa?

How are people exploiting South Africa?

The fantastic legal, transport and communications are, I assume, for the 10% minority Whites.

Yet it has one of the best national anthems.


What is going on in South Africa?

LET ME TELL YOU THE STORY OF LOVE AND HATE AGAIN (OR SHE HATE ME)

She Hate Me is a film by Spike Lee in which a Wall Street executive is fired for blowing the whistle on one of his company's dodgy products. To retain his Wall Street lifestyle he sells his sperm to the lesbian friends of his former fiancee, who he found out was lesbian herself when he walked in on her having sex with a woman one day when he arrived home early. The lesbian friends have children. In order to become pregnant he has sex with the lesbians and gets paid $10k per lesbian. But it's not all about a heterosexual man having sex with lesbians to retain his Wall Street lifestyle. There is a reference to Enron too.

But the most interesting bit is definitely the opening, as it runs through all the dollar bills and the symbolism on them.

And there are some great one liners:
"You're Frank Wills, son...You don't fuck with the money, son. It's cold-blooded."

"Welcome to this edition of The Perp Walk. This week's guest star: You! Aaw sheeeeeeeed"

So why am I talking about this on Valentine's Day?

Because I think this film pushes the agenda that Dr Richard Day talked about in 1969.

It is a very provocative film, one of Lee's best in my opinion.

But the title stands out for me.

ROLL OUT THOSE LAZY, HAZY CRAZY DAYS OF SUMMER

Nat King Cole - Those Lazy, Hazy, Crazy Days of Summer (HQ)

SEAMUS MILNE SERVES THE PURPOSE OF GIVING THE WARMONGERING ZIOGUARDIAN SOME CREDIBILITY

If Seamus Milne stopped writing for The Guardian then I believe it would go a long way to exposing the The Guardian as the true bona fide controlled left warmongering NATO media organisation that it is. Milne is allowed to write for The Guardian to serve one purpose, and one purpose only ; to give The Guardian some anti-war credibility while it softly gently propagandises for war.

As readers will know, last December I analysed the editorials of The Guardian regarding Syria, concluding that The Guardian/Observer:
1. immediately and consistently accused Assad and the Syrian military of the horrific events at Ghouta on 21st August, not once considering the rebels as culprits, despite:
(a) an abundance of evidence that the rebels possessed chemical weapons, had tested them on live rabbits and had issued threats on video of using chemical weapons, ,
(b) the sponsor of all the cutthroat cannibalism, Prince Bandar bin Sultan of the Diabolical Medieval Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, had issued a series of threats to Vladimir Putin just the month before that he was about to unleash hell on earth in Syria and Lebanon,
(c) following the recapture of al Qusair by the Syrian Arab Army the rebels were facing annihilation and desperately needed overt large scale military assistance on their behalf;
(d) doing so would have provided the perfect casus belli for war on Syria, crossing Obama's 'red line';
2. was overjoyed at Syria relinquishing its stockpile of chemical weapons but not once mentioned Israel's much larger, more powerful and more devastating stockpile of not just chemical but biological and nuclear weapons;
3. supported war on Syria, but only under R2P.

And that kind of editorial continues today, which mentions the following countries in a negative light, Syria, Russia and Iran, placing all the responsibility for the mayhem in Syria on them, while, as usual, not once mentioning everybody's favourite Zionist entity, Israel, or everybody's favourite diabolical medieval kingdom, Saudi Arabia, as the instigators of not just the violence and bloodshed in Syria, but also that in Iraq, Lebanon and Libya.

NOT ONCE!!

All the violence and bloodshed in the Middle East and North Africa can be traced back to 9/11, in which Zionist agents were in charge of the response by the USA, military and political, to that murdered September day, and Saudi Arabia supplied the patsies (but all with the nod and a wink from the DFQ).

The plan for all the wars since then is on YouTube!!

General Wesley Clark reveals how it was leaked to him by someone in The Pentagon!!

IT'S ALL THERE!!

ON YOUTUBE!!!!!!!!!!

And when you include The Redirection by Seymour Hersh then you have got yourself one hell of a front page story.

But what does The Guardian print on its front page instead; Ed Snowden's 'revelations' that we are all being spied on.

But we knew this by the late 1990's!!

The editorial in question is entitled Syria: save the civilians, and is at http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/feb/12/syria-aid-civilians-negotiations

The civilians of Syria could be saved by Saudi Arabia calling off its cutthroats.

But do we hear that? NO! Instead we get that it's all Russia fault. Hence the attacks on Putin via homosexuality and snowflakes.

PATHETIC!!

In contrast, Seamus Milne has written a very considered piece on Great Britain's attitude to war, and the possible growing division between us, the ordinary muggins Great British public who send our sons and daughters, brothers and sisters into war, and our politicians on the grave issue of war.

That's likely to prove harder than before. Each war attracts less support than the last. Britain has a chance to turn its back on centuries of warmaking, shake off the mentality of junior global policeman and start to build a different relationship with the rest of the world.

[source : Seamus Milne, A 'pause' in centuries of British wars is not enough, The Guardian, http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/feb/12/pause-centuries-british-wars-elite-panicking, 13th February 2014]

Amen to that!!

MOST MEMBERS OF THE MARSTEN HOUSE WANT THEIR FAMILIES TO LIVE IN AUSTERITY AND BE SLAVES TO POSSESSED WARMONGERS

Early Day Motion 748

That this House notes that the hundredth anniversary of the Bradbury Pound on 7 August 2014 is a welcome reminder of the historic precedent for public credit as the sound basis for debt-and interest-free Treasury money and therefore the sound alternative to the national debt and interest-bearing bank money; congratulates the Forum for Stable Currencies for having promoted the public credit since 2002; and urges HM Treasury to follow John Bradbury's model and address social, economic and political issues across party lines in one fell swoop and avoid wholly unnecessary austerity cuts.

Tabled 18th November 2013

Number of signatures : 5
Corbyn, Jeremy Labour Party Islington North 20.11.2013
Flynn, Paul Labour Party Newport West 20.11.2013
Hopkins, Kelvin Labour Party Luton North 19.11.2013
McDonnell, John Labour Party Hayes and Harlington 16.12.2013
Mitchell, Austin Labour Party Great Grimsby 18.11.2013

Note : All Labour

Note : George Galloway has not signed

There are 650 constituencies.

5 out of 650 = not 100%

I can only guess that the remaining 644 (one constituency is currently not represented due to the elected MP dying recently) all want their families beholden to a cabal of demonically possessed warmongers who can create money out of thin air.

REBELS THREATENED TO ATTACK AID CONVOY ON A VIDEO UPLOADED TO YOUTUBE ON 29TH JANUARY

Over the weekend an aid convoy into Homs was attacked. The NATO media is reporting that the attackers are unknown, and mock the suggestions by the Syrian government that the rebels are responsible.

The (Real and True) Friends of Syria website has posted a video of somebody threatening to attack any aid convoy into Homs. The video has English subtitles. The Friends of Syria link is
http://friendsofsyria.co/2014/02/09/fsa-terrorists-threatened-to-fire-at-un-aid-convoy-over-a-week-prior-to-attack/
and the subtitled video is


That subtitled video was only uploaded yesterday, but is said to be based on video uploaded in late January. So I dug around and sure enough the original video, without subtitles, was uploaded on 29th January 2014. The original video can be found on YouTube at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IGDzrGnXA4w, and here it is:


It took me less than 2 minutes to find this lot.

And to see how this is being reported in the NATO media, here is The Guardian's report.

Relief convoys carrying humanitarian aid into a besieged rebel-held area of the central Syrian city of Homs came under fire for a second consecutive day on Sunday despite an appeal by the UN to government and rebel forces to respect a ceasefire, which is due to expire on Monday.

Reports described mortar bombs falling as UN and aid agency vehicles tried to deliver desperately-needed supplies to about 2,500 people trapped in the old city area.

Hunger and malnutrition are rife amid accusations that President Bashar al-Assad's forces are trying to starve rebels into submission.

On Friday, UN and Syrian government officials agreed on a three-day truce and "humanitarian pause" which allowed about 80 women, children and the elderly to leave.

The first food packages, hygiene kits and medicine went in on Saturday, but the Syrian Arab Red Crescent (Sarc) said mortar fire impacted near its convoy and shots were fired at its trucks, wounding one driver.

No one else was evacuated from the area because of the attack, which opposition activists blamed on government forces.

"We barely got our staff out alive," said Khaled Erksoussi, head of operations at Sarc. Syrian state TV said 600 people had left.

Sam Dagher, a correspondent for the Wall Street Journal, reported that more than a dozen men among the latest evacuees had been "whisked away by Syrian security forces to an unknown place".

In the past, men detained in such circumstances have disappeared and there are fears the evacuation will be followed by a new assault.

The violence brought calls to respect the ceasefire, protect civilians and facilitate the safe delivery of aid.

"The UN and our humanitarian partners will not be deterred from doing the best we can to bring aid to those needing our help," said Valerie Amos, the UN's humanitarian chief.

The Syrian government blamed the attacks on rebels.

Homs, Syria's third-largest city, was one of the first areas to rebel against Assad in 2011 and has been particularly hard hit by the war.

Over the past year, the government has regained control over much of the city except for a few heavily-damaged neighbourhoods in the historic centre.

Last Friday's humanitarian agreement on Homs was the first tangible result of peace talks launched two weeks ago in Geneva to find a political solution to end a conflict that has killed more than 136,000 people and displaced millions since it erupted nearly three years ago.

Negotiations resume on Monday at the UN's Swiss headquarters but expectations for a breakthrough are as low as they were at the beginning.

The most that can be said is that both sides have agreed to attend a new session being chaired by the veteran Algerian mediator, Lakhdar Brahimi, who has to square the circle of Assad's refusal to step down with the opposition demand that he must go.

Syrian government aircraft were reported on Sunday to have dropped bombs killing at least 11 people in rebel-held areas of Aleppo, according to the UK-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights.

[source : Syria: relief convoys heading to Homs attacked for second day running, The Guardian, http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/feb/09/syria-homs-relief-convoys-attacked, 9th February 2014]

Note that:
1. There is a short single sentence stating that the Syrian government blames the rebels, but there is no further investigation or analysis.
2. The report does not apportion blame to anyone.
3. The report ends with the suggestion that the Syrian government may be responsible for the attack on the aid convoy by repeating claims from the totally discredited UK-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights that the Syrian government is dropping barrel bombs on Aleppo.

Regarding this latest claim of barrel bombs on Aleppo, I have still to see a barrel bomb being dropped. No photograph. No video. Nothing. And allegedly this has been going on for months!! Yet not one photograph or video!!

On the other hand there are reports that there is a fight between rebel factions in which they blow each other up.

So, as they say, you do the maths.

The Guardian still seem preoccupied with promoting their man Ed Snowden rather than reporting the truth about Syria .

ANDREW JACKSON : AN EXERCISE IN MANIPULATION

Veterans Today has suspiciously allowed an article to be published praising President Andrew Jackson.

Andrew Jackson was probably one of the most intrepid men of his era to vigorously oppose a privately-owned central bank because he foresaw that eventually usurers would end up cheating the common people.

...The question is really simple: If the Bank was a responsible financial institution, why did it contribute to the national debt? If Jackson was so ignorant and unscrupulous, why did he eliminate the national debt by January 1835? Historian and economist Murray N. Rothbard writes,

“Far from being the ignorant bumpkins that most historians have depicted, the Jacksonians were steeped in the knowledge of sound economics, particularly of the Ricardian Currency School.”

[source : Jonas E. Alexis, Andrew Jackson, the Federal Reserve, and the Looting of America, Veterans Today, http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/02/08/andrew-jackson-the-federal-reserve-and-the-looting-of-america/, 8th February 2014]

But Andrew Jackson was a traitor to the USA, witting or unwitting.

The article contains a portrait of Andrew Jackson, with a quote attributed to Jackson: "You are a den of vipers and thieves, and by the Eternal, I will you rout you out!".

But the article does not address the "den of vipers and thieves" who sat around Jackson and what they did with money belonging to the United States. Jackson is famous, and in my view undeservedly praised, for destroying the Second Bank of The United States (BUS2). One action that led to this destruction was the removal of money belonging to The United States Government from the bank. Jackson appointed three people to the position of Secretary of the Treasury to get that money removed. The first two refused to remove the money. So Jackson sacked both of them and eventually appointed Roger B Taney. Like Jackson, Taney was a slaveholder, but from Maryland, and as Attorney General of The United States under Jackson, Taney upheld the rights of slaveholders. Taney would eventually write the verdict in the Dred Scott case. But when Taney removed the federal funds from BUS2, where were they deposited? In banks owned by Taneys' pals!! And what did they proceed to do with all that loot that really belonged to the people of The United States not Taney's pals? Despite Jackson's alleged hatred of paper money, Taney's pals used the magic of fractional reserve banking and used that loot as a base to create lots and lots of money out of thin air and cause an unregulated monetary expansion and speculation in land which would ultimately lead to the Panic of 1837.

The article regurgitates the usual crap that Jackson fought the bankers, which I assume has been picked up from Eustace Mullins and G Edward Griffin, among others. Both of these authors have produced 'good' books in that they expose to some degree the Rothschilds and The Federal Reserve system, yet both push this myth that Jackson fought the Rothschilds.

If that is the case, then why did Jackson appoint the Rothschilds as bankers to the USA?!

This myth that Jackson fought the Rothschilds is due to two unsourced references. The first is from Eustace Mullins who claims, without a reference, that Nicholas Biddle was an agent of the Rothschilds. The second is from Gustavus Myers who claims, only in a footnote and without a reference, that the Rothschilds were the power behind BUS2.

The curious thing about Myers is that the 'reference', i.e. unsourced footnote, from Myers is in a 3 volume series on the great American fortunes, which has extensive chapters on families such as Astor, Morgan and Vanderbilt. Yet despite stating (without a reference) that the Rothschilds were the power behind BUS2, Myers does not write a chapter on the Rothschilds! Yet he is prepared to casually say (and only in a footnote) that the Rothschilds ran the Second Bank of The United States! Very curious, considering that they are definitely the power behind the Federal Reserve.

And as for Mullins, the case against Mullins and his deliberate manipulation of history is his use (or rather abuse) of the autobiography of Wall Street banker Henry Clews, which is entitled 28 Years in Wall Street. I cover this abuse/manipulation by Mullins in A FLAW which I posted on 30th January 2013. In A FLAW I expose that Clews does not say what Mullins states Clews says, and that contrary to Mullins' claim that the Panic of 1837 was engineered by the Rothschilds because Jackson had destroyed 'their' Second Bank of the United States, thus implying that Jackson fought the Rothschilds, Clews states that it was Jackson who caused the Panic of 1837 by his removal of federal funds from BUS2, which led to Jackson's banker pals causing a huge monetary expansion and land speculation bubble which led to Jackson issuing his Specie Circular demanding that payment to the US Government for privatised land be made in silver or gold.

There are some other suspicious things about Mullins:
1. he had access to The Library of Congress that only intelligence agents had;
2. when asked about his poor referencing he always responded with, "It's in The Library of Congress";
3. his benefactor, Ezra Pound, was an admirer of Martin van Buren, as well as of Hitler and Mussolini!

I will soon show that van Buren was a traitor to the USA.

Another myth is that Jackson paid off the national debt, implying that Jackson paid off ALL the debt. I will agree that he did pay off the debt, but most of the debt had been paid off by Nicholas Biddle, the hard work having been done by Biddle through his implementation of The American System of Economics that built American industry and thus America into a threat to the British Empire, a threat that ultimately led to the British engineering the US Civil War to splinter the USA so that the British and their allies could pick up the pieces. Jackson had only a very small amount of debt to pay off. So how did Jackson do this? Not through industry. He sold government land and privatised it all. I wonder who bought all that? It was this privatisation by Jackson that led to Jackson issuing his Specie Circular.

So does Clews praise Jackson?

Not one bit.

Clews mocks Jackson and his sidekick van Buren, and accuses Jackson and his hangers on such as van Buren of bad mismanagement, and actually praises Biddle for his management of BUS2 and the economy!

But does Mullins mention this? ABSOLUTELY NOT!!

So far from being "steeped in the knowledge of sound economics", as supporter of Rockefeller-sponsored Austrian Economics Murray Rothbard is quoted in the article as stating, Jackson and his supporters were at least guilty of total greed and mismanagement, but there is also very strong evidence that this was plot by the British to destroy the United States from becoming a threat to the British Empire.

The question is, why?

So who was Jackson?

Jackson is portrayed as the all American hero for defeating the British at New Orleans, much like Obama is portrayed as the all American hero for allegedly killing Osama bin Laden in 2011. But bin Laden died around Christmas 2001 from Marfan Syndrome. If this news had been released there would have been no war on Afghanistan to get the opium harvest up to record levels after the Taliban had destroyed it, and there would have been no wars on Iraq, Lebanon, Libya and Syria.

Jackson was a major slaveholder from Tennessee who was implicated in treason against the United States well before he was President. The founder of The American System of Economics was Alexander Hamilton. Hamilton was assassinated by bona fide traitor Aaron Burr, who shot Hamilton in an ungentlemanly manner during a duel the two had, a duel due to Hamilton exposing Burr's treason to hand over New England back to the British. After this assassination Burr fled New York and stayed with Jackson for several months to plot the handing over a different portion of the United States, Louisiana, back to the British. Burr was arrested and tried but got off because one of his pals led the grand jury. Burr then escaped to Great Britain and stayed a few years with British intelligence agent Jeremy Bentham. Burr returned to the USA and teamed up with Martin van Buren, the two having become political allies and friends before Burr fled to Great Britain. Following Jackson becoming the hero of The Battle of New Orleans, these two traitors, Burr and van Buren, then began to promote Jackson for President.

But members of the LPAC team, past and present, who promote The American System of Economics and this version of Andrew Jackson, do not get off either. Last summer I read The Sixth Great Power: Barings 1762-1929 by Philip Ziegler which is a biography of the Barings family. The Barings were that powerful that Ziegler called them the sixth great power, comparing them to the power of a nation, even an empire. Barings are portrayed as the masters of evil, at the centre of British intrigue against the rebel United States, running The British East India Company.

I posted quite frequently last summer on my curious findings, some of which were:
1. The President of the Bank of North America and The First Bank of The United States was Thomas Willing, from the Anglophile Shippen family. Willing did not support independence, yet he was appointed to these very powerful positions. Willing had appointed Barings as his personal bankers in 1774. He appointed them bankers to the United States Government too!!
2. And to add to this business relationship between Willing and Barings, two of Willing's granddaughters married into the Baring family!!
3. Despite their alleged hatred of all things American, Barings supported the USA during the 1812 War and supported Lincoln during the Civil War. They could have let the USA go down financially at several times by denying credit, but didn't, the most relevant example is the troublesome but profitable relationship between Barings and The Second Bank of the United States under Biddle. Barings also brokered the purchase of Louisiana and Alaska.

I have written to both Anton Chaitkin and Webster Tarpley about this curious relationship that Barings had with the United States.

As yet I have not heard from either.

IN RESPONSE

Paul Joseph Watson has produced a short video on the promotion of gay rights.
http://www.infowars.com/why-is-the-mass-media-promoting-gay-rights/

Paul correctly identifies that as things get worse for us then our anger will be channeled into outlets other than expressing that anger politically.

But the facts remain:
1. Dr Richard Day in his 1969 speech stated that a lot of things would happen, and most have happened, one of which is that homosexuality would be encouraged. According to Day, the reasons for this are:
a) as stated above, like gladitorial conflicts in Ancient Rome, occupations of the body such as sex take our minds off our dire predicament, so "anything goes" encourages us to take our minds off the loss of rights, freedoms, jobs, etc.;
b) however, heterosexual sex produces children, and there is nothing the ruling global elite hate more than a child (unless they are about to abuse and then sacrifice it to their dark lord satan). Children = resources. But homosexual sex does not produce children. If we can be encouraged to engage in homosexual sex as the norm, and a homosexual couple (or even more? 3? 4? >4? in a homosexual relationship) still want children (after all the anti-child propaganda, such as the estimated cost of bringing up a child, and the fun you miss out on, and how exhausting they are etc) then children can be created in a wonderful laboratory, that child given the perfect DNA for the role that the ruling global elite select that child to play in their global village.
c) pro homosexual propaganda is nothing new and has not just suddenly appeared to attack Putin this week. Homosexual characters and stories have been appearing in the media more and more frequently over the last few decades. It would be interesting to see when this began, and I would be willing to gamble that it was around 1969, give or take a year or two. I just ran a search on Startpage on the phrase "homosexual characters british tv timeline" and found this on Out magazine's website
http://www.out.com/out20/timeline
which seems a comprehensive study of homosexuality on American TV. Their list starts at 1967 with an anti-homosexual documentary, but by 1971 they say the first homosexual character appeared on TV in 1971. The following year there were a few more, and more in the following years. So around 1969 it looks like a decision was taken to promote homosexuality, on American TV at least. On British TV there was that series Queer as Folk, and in the 1970's there was Larry Grayson, John Inman's character Mr Humphries, and even Monty Python addressed homosexuality with that sketch in which Michael Palin runs up to John Cleese dressed as a Policeman to tell Cleese about a crime but ends up coyly asking him back to his place, which Cleese agrees to do.
2. Putin is a massive thorn in the side of the ruling global elite. They ran the White Revolution through Navalny in 2011 against him, and earlier in 2011 warned Putin through editorials of the Financial Times to either not run for the Russian Presidency and allow the City of London golden boy Medvedev to win, or to be more like Medvedev (Medvedev acquiesced to the attack on Libya). But Putin ran, won and has supported Assad throughout, correctly identifying the threat from the Jihadis, leading to Bandar issuing his threats last year, which Bandar made good on in Volgograd. The gay rights issue is just one of the lines of attack on Putin. However, Putin also wants a rise in the Russian population. The ruling global elite want a decrease, in fact a huge decrease, everywhere, as shown by the now famous quote from our very own Prince Philip wanting to reincarnate as a deadly virus to reduce human population. To the ruling global elite we are useless eaters and a cancer on the planet in times of peace, and cannon fodder in times of war (that they engineer).

What worries me is that the ruling global elite do seem to be able to turn our emotions on and off like a tap. They engineered 2 world wars, tyrants like Hitler and Stalin, a Holocaust, Israel, and 9/11, and have so far been able to get what they have wanted.

But the good news is that Putin has kicked their agents out of Russia or thrown them in jail, and has opposed their moves in the Middle East, hence their attacks on Putin through gay rights, or snowflakes, or whatever else they can think of. And last year a vote for war was defeated in the Marsten House. There is some hope, but a handful of people can't defeat the ruling global elite without support and/or assistance.

I am not anti homosexual. But I don't want it ramming down my throat as part of a population control agenda that would allow warmongering kiddie fiddling Satanists to create genetically engineered children to serve selected roles in their global village of a vastly reduced human population.

THE UNHERO ED SNOWDEN

I was very disappointed this morning to read a tweet by one of the journalists I consider to be one of, if not the, finest journalists that this sad and uninformed Disunited Fascist Queendom has, Tony Gosling, which called Ed Snowden a hero.

The #Snowden 'Black Propaganda' Files: How @Guardian's @lukeharding1968 turned another hero into a villain @RT_com http://t.co/bDFPwr3K2v

— Tony Gosling (@TonyGosling) February 8, 2014

The tweet links to Tony's latest Op-Edge in Russia Today about Snowden.

Since he first hit the front page of The Guardian last June, Ed Snowden has been, and sadly still is being, held up as a hero of our times for telling us that we are all being spied on. But a significant minority already knew this following the revealing and official confirmation of the Echelon program in the late 1990s...15 YEARS AGO!!

Now, if 15 years ago our emails and phone calls were being intercepted and listened into then there is no doubt that they still are, and that that program would be logically expanded to include every type of electronic communication. I would be very surprised if all the new means of electronic communication had not been OK'd by the likes of the NSA and GCHQ before they were released. The ideal mode of communication, for the spies that is, is one which leads the users to believe that they are not being spied on, that their mode of communication is super super secure, for then the users will chat freely and openly about anything and everything. So is it possible that some means of communication have been developed by the NSA, released as if super super secure, the NSA then pretends it can't crack it, so only those who require total secrecy use it?

But back to Snowden and my huge doubts about his 'revelations'.

Snowden came to fame through The Guardian.

On 28th December 2010 The Guardian published an editorial entitled Mikhail Khodorkovsky: Russia's Political Prisoner, which was 'signed' by Mikhail Khodorkovsky, to imply that Khordokovsky had written the editorial himself. But Khordokovsky was not a 'political prisoner'. He was doing bird for a long list of crimes against the people of Russia, primarily financial fraud. Khordokovsky was, and presumably still is following the joy in NATO countries at his early release, an agent of the Rothschilds. He had a deal that Yukos would be handed to Lord Jacob Rothschild, and he had created The Open Russia Foundation in 2001 which was launched in Somerset House, which is owned by The Rothschilds, and on the board sat himself, Lord Jacob Rothschild and Henry Kissinger. So immediately we can see a very, very strong link between the Rothschilds and The Guardian. Khordokovsky was one of a handful of Russian 'entrepreneurs', mostly Jewish, who economically raped Russia under the pisshead Yeltsin. Most fled to either London or Tel Aviv shortly after Putin laid down the law to them. Khordokovsky stayed. Berezovsky was another member of this gang, but he fled to London. Berezovsky was given virtually all one show of BBC Question Time in 2007 to verbally attack Putin and Russia. The Guardian also assisted by giving Berezovsky, on several occasions, the opportunity to do the same in their newspaper. But Berezovsky is now dead, after writing to Putin that he wanted to return to Russia (I wonder what tales Berezovsky could have told Putin?).

But to add to this Guardian-Rothschild link, last December I posted THE GUARDIAN AND ITS ROLE IN ACCUSING ASSAD AND PUSHING FOR WAR ON SYRIA, in which I analysed the editorials of The Guardian and its sister The Observer following the horrific events at Ghouta on 21st August last year.

Here is brief on the situation in Syria at that time:
1. The Syrian rebels of all kinds are being financed by the Diabolical Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, due to an agreement reached between the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia that the latter would unleash cutthroat Jihadis onto nations like Syria, Iran and Lebanon because a plan for war on seven nations, one of which was Syria, revealed to General Wesley Clark shortly 9/11 was seriously behind schedule;
2. Because this plan was behind schedule the Wall Street/Bilderberg/Israel faction wanted pro-fascist pro-war pro-Israel Mitt Romney in The White House, and gave 10 times as much money to Romney than they did to Obama, which indicates that they want war...big time. But they got Nobel Peace Prize Winner Obama instead, who is reluctant to engage in any overt large scale military conflict;
3. Obama was immediately embroiled in a series of minor scandals, all designed to pressure him into attacking Syria, which were reinforced by personal visits from warmongers like Cameron and Erdogan, and lies that Assad had used CWs, thus crossing Obama's 'red line';
3. After the recapture of al Qusair by the Syrian Arab Army, the writing was on the wall for Bandar's rebels. So Bandar went to see Putin and issued a threat: if Russia would abandon Syria then Saudi Arabia would buy billions of dollars of Russian weapons and allow Russia to operate in the Middle East; if not, then Bandar would unleash Jihadi terrorists onto the Winter Olympics, and also unleash hell on earth in Syria and Lebanon. Putin rejected this heartwarming, lovely threat. So far, we can see that Bandar does not renege on his threats;
4. So by August Bandar's cutthroat cannibals were facing total annihilation, which was compounded by news that many a Syrian rebel was realising that they had been taken for fools and they were abandoning the 'rebellion', which was in fact a covert operation by Israel to weaken Israel's enemies;
5. Following the use of CWs at Khan al Assal, Russia investigated the event and provided evidence to the UN that the rebels, not Assad, had used CWs there. Syria agreed to allow the UN into Syria to investigate Khan al Assal itself. Within days of this agreement being announced the rebels went back into Khan al Assal and slaughtered every living thing, including soldiers of the Syrian Arab Army, so that nobody was left alive to give evidence to the UN. UN weapons inspectors were in Damascus on 21st August;
6. A year earlier Obama had issued his 'red line' warning on the use of CWs in Syria, leading to many false claims that Assad had used CWs;
7. Former French foreign minister Roland Dumas stated that he was asked by Great Britain in 2009, TWO YEARS BEFORE THE FAKE ARAB SPRING ERUPTED IN SYRIA, to help them smuggle Jihadis into Syria. He also stated his belief that the war on Syria is due to Israel.

So any use of CWs by Assad would have been suicidal, and would have provided the perfect casus belli for NATO to bomb Syria to smithereens. On the other hand, Bandar's rebels faced total annihilation and needed overt large scale military intervention on their behalf. Israel had already tried this two times earlier last year when it claimed to have attacked a warehouse storing, and a convoy carrying, weapons en route from Iran to Hezbollah, when in fact Israel attacked several HQs of the Syrian Arab Army in synchronicity with the rebels who attacked several checkpoints of the SAA in Damascus.

The conclusion from the analysis of the editorials was:
1. The Guardian/Observer immediately and consistently accused Assad of the horrific events at Ghouta on 21st August, despite an abundance of evidence that the rebels had chemical weapons (CWs), had tested them on live rabbits and had issued threats on video of using CWs to get what they wanted;
2. The Guardian/Observer supported war on Syria, but only under R2P (to save the civilians from Bandar's cutthroats who had been smuggled into Syria by Great Britain).
3. The Guardian/Observer supported Syria relinquishing its CWs but not once mentioned that Israel has a much larger, more horrific arsenal of not just CWs but also biological and even nuclear weapons, and nor did the editorials suggest that these should be destroyed.

Israel is a creation of the Rothschilds, their plaything.

Another very suspicious event linked to Snowden is that Sister Agnes Mariam investigated the events of Ghouta and concluded that it was a false flag attack, designed to pin the blame on Assad and provoke a war on Syria. She was to speak at the Stop The War conference last November. But one very surprising opponent of her findings and of her proposed appearance at that conference was NATO media darling Jeremy Scahill, who had recently released his documentary Dirty Wars on the killer drone program. Scahill very surprisingly and very bizarrely launched his own very personal but very public dirty war against Sister Agnes Mariam to get her banned from the Stop The War conference last November, a dirty war which he won. After this very bizarre behaviour of Scahill, who is Scahill teaming up with? Glenn Greenwald...who brought us Ed Snowden, and who now has millions and millions of dollars for a new media venture (after only releasing 1% of Snowden's very, very, very important and devastating revelations after 8 months).

So we have to ask:
1. why would The Guardian, with this highly suspicious link to the Rothschilds, supporting Rothschild agent Mikhail Khordokovsky and Rothschild plaything Israel while supporting war on Israel's enemies and not telling the truth about 9/11 and the subsequent wars, allow the revelations of Ed Snowden to be front page news, not just once, but for a whole summer? And when previous whistleblowers had been ignored?
2. if the Snowden revelations are that important and devastating then why have we only seen 1% of them?
3. why has nobody been prosecuted?
4. why are the proposed changes to the spying only legalising what they do now and not banning it?

It all looks highly suspicious to me.

All that Snowden has done is produced a climate in which we have accepted the spying. I mean, why are there no protests? Why are there no agents provocateur causing occupations and riots in the streets about the spying when we see occupations and riots in Ukraine?

And the vast majority have accepted the spying because of 'al Qaeda', sold to us as a collection of cold-blooded terrorists wishing to destroy our way of life. But we created al Qaeda. We nurtured them through a Covenant of Security, which allowed preachers like Michael Adebalajo to preach Jihad against Syria, thus providing more terrorists for Great Britain to smuggle into Syria, and provide more target practice for the Syrian Arab Army.

And Snowden's claims divert attention from the more insidious spying capabilities of electronic remote mind reading and writing.

POSITIVE

I need cheering up a bit, something positive.

KC and the Sunshine Band - Get Down Tonight


Rose Royce - Do Your Dance


Rose Royce - It Makes You Feel Like Dancin'

PRAISE THE LORD FOR ALISTAIR BURT

I wasn't going to write for a while, but along comes one of those special politicians to open his big mouth to provoke me into writing. That special politician is Alistair Burt.

Alistair Burt used to be an officer for The Conservative Friends of Israel, but recently appears to have possibly turned a bit against Israeli policies, but not much. And I say not much because Burt has written something for Chatham House, THE think tank for propagating British foreign policy, which laments the lack of military response on behalf of Israel last year. Burt's ignorant, and thus suspicious given his former relationship with Israel, article exposes the kind of thinking that goes on in the corridors of power: Burt suggests that we should abandon democracy when it comes to waging war!!

The father and/or grandfather of many a reader of this blog and of Burt's article will have fought in World War 1 and World War 2 to defend democracy. We were told that Germany was to blame for WW1. In fact it is the British monarchy who engineered all the bloodshed of WW1 with the aim of creating a world government that they would control. But that failed. We were told that WW2 was fought to defend democracy against the Nazis, yet Hitler was created by The City of London and Wall Street but they then turned on him, siding with a known mass murderer of millions, Stalin, eventually giving him the very country we went to war to defend, Poland!! And not forgetting that WW2, following many, many more deaths and much more trauma and chaos, eventually produced a world government, the United Nations.

Burt was very pissed off at the decision not to attack Syria last year after the horrific events of Ghouta. But Burt still thinks Assad was responsible, not once proposing a suggestion as to why Assad would order such an attack when UN inspectors were just down the road and such an attack would provide the perfect casus belli for NATO to go to war against Syria. On the other hand there was plenty of evidence that the rebels possessed chemical weapons, had tested them on live rabbits, and had issued threats on video of using their chemical weapons to get what they wanted or needed. And oh how they needed overt large scale military assistance in August because they were being annihilated by the Syrian Arab Army.

And not forgetting the lovely threats that Prince Bandar bin Sultan issued to Putin last summer.

And, like The Guardian, Burt is overjoyed that Syria has decided to relinquish its chemical weapons, but not once does Burt mention Israel's more powerful, more threatening and more horrific stockpile of not only chemical but also biological and even nuclear weapons!

Burt also has a dig at Russia, Iran and Hezbollah, not once mentioning the demented, medieval Jihadis and their cutthroat cannibalism, and the fact that Russia, Iran and Hezbollah have been and are fighting against these cannibal cutthroat Jihadis.

Nor does Burt mention that it is we who planned the insertion of the Syrian rebels in 2009...TWO YEARS BEFORE THE (FAKE) ARAB SPRING KICKED OFF IN SYRIA!!

Alistair Burt is a disgrace to the human race. And he is not the only one in The Marsten House. That evil house if full 'em, living in blissful ignorance.

Burt's incredible example of warmongering ignorance can sadly be found at
http://www.chathamhouse.org/publications/twt/archive/view/197205

MISSION IMPOSSIBLE

Good Morning

Planet Earth is run by warmongering kiddie-fiddling Satanists who can basically create money out of thin air to buy this politician and finance that political organisation or think tank to propagate any idea(s) they find useful at any particular time. They are very close to establishing a one world government through which they will be able to implement drastic population reduction policies, believing that this planet is theirs and that there are too many useless eaters as a living cancer on this planet. They are already culling the population covertly by, for example, introducing sterilising chemicals into the food chain, but these covert policies, though having some effect, are not having the full effect they thought and hoped they would.

Though some of the people are awake to this diabolical plot, they are a tiny, tiny fraction, and they are struggling to awaken the majority, only some of whom apparently are open to being informed, but only some of those want to be informed, and only some of those want to be saved but can’t be bothered to offer support or assist in their own salvation.

Your mission, should you choose to accept it, is to rescue this sad example of an alleged intelligent, compassionate but bona fide erotic animal.

ROSE ROYCE

Now really starting to appreciate just how good they were (except for the questionable 70's fashion).

Rose Royce ~ Is It Love You're After


Rose Royce - Wishing On A Star


Rose Royce - Love don't live here anymore

WAYNE MADSEN OPTIMISTIC THAT AIPAC WILL BE DEFEATED OVER IRAN SANCTIONS

Regarding the struggle by the Ziolobby to impose more sanctions on Iran, an act that would lead to some kind of violent conflict because sanctions would provoke Iran into doing something, which would lead to the USA (under Israeli pressure) to respond, etc., Wayne Madsen

called this “very encouraging” and said this is “the first major showdown between an American administration and the Israel lobby. It doesn’t look right now that the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, known as AIPAC, has the necessary votes to get this legislation through. And if it’s defeated it would represent the first major defeat of AIPAC in the existence of the organization, which has been around for several decades abd vetoing basically any kind of American initiative towards peace in the Middle East.”

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC.), a chief advocate of new Iran sanctions, admitted that efforts to convince more members to get on board had run into problems.

The White House has launched a full-court press to prevent a vote in the Senate, warning that passing new sanctions now would undercut the fragile nuclear talks with Iran.

[source : Journalist: Iran bill first fight between US gov., AIPAC, PressTV, http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2014/02/03/349091/major-showdown-btwn-us-gov-and-aipac/, 3rd February 2014]

They did 9/11 to get at nations like Syria and Iran.

Syria is now a pile of rubble in many areas but President Bashar al Assad is still in power, and likely to stay in power according to Director of National Intelligence James Clapper. The likes of The Bilderberg Post, etc still want an overt war on Syria. They ran the horrific false flag at Ghouta last August to provoke some kind of overt large scale military intervention to save Bandar's cutthroat Jihadis...but it failed. All last year they begged and whinged and threw childish tantrums, demanding war on Syria. But Obama refused. Hence PNAC's Bill Kristol's The Emergency Committee for Israel releasing their undisguised declaration of war on Obama.

But the big kahuna was always Iran. They wrote Which Path to Persia?, a document in which the Zionists think aloud about how to get Iran.

And Obama is denying them their wars.

Hence all the latest talk about impeachment and military coups by retired officers on ZioWorld Net Daily.

Obama is implementing some of the agenda, such as TPP, but not the wars. He loves his Nobel Peace Prize too much. They wanted Romney in, but they got Obama. Hence all the scandals and pressure to attack Syria. And all the pressure to impose more sanctions on Iran.

They want war.

They can't get enough of it, particularly when they're not doing the fighting.

The Truth Serum Report of the Year 2012 suggested that Obama and Dempsey and others were considering exposing 9/11. So far they have not, but there have been some cracks allowing some light to be shone on 9/11 when the role of Saudi Arabia in 9/11 was recently discussed in the US media. But that quickly stopped.

Some of the same high-level sources who point to Richard Clarke as the US boss of the Israeli-instigated 9/11 false flag operation also claim that President Obama, Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Dempsey, and other powerful Americans are considering exposing the truth about 9/11 during a second Obama term. In other words, Obama's re-election could put Israel out of business, and get Netanyahu hanged from the nearest lamp-post.

[source : Israel seeks war on Iran to keep lid on 9/11, PressTV, http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2012/09/20/262683/israel-seeks-iran-war-to-keep-lid-on-911/, 21st September 2012]

AN UNFORGETTABLE VOICE

Nat King Cole - Unforgettable - Lyrics (Official)

I DON'T UNDERSTAND THIS PLANET

There are over 7 billion people on this planet.

Most of them live in poverty of various levels, from starvation and destitution, to at least having something to eat and drink and a tent over their heads.

There is war. Way too much war.

There is terrorism. And way too much of that.

But most of that is due to just one relatively young nation : Israel.

There has been a first world war.

That war was supposed to have been that terrible and horrific, yet 20 years later there was a second world war...even longer, and more violent and horrific than the first.

A visitor to this planet could be forgiven for believing that the human race is loveless.

Poverty. Extreme poverty.

War. Extreme war.

Terrorism. Extremist terrorism.

Yet very few people ask the question : why?

And even fewer can be bothered to answer that question : why?

And even fewer actually find the reason (or reasons).

Why do very few ask the question : why?

I thought sex was called 'making love'?

But from what I have seen it is far from it. Nowhere near it. It seems to produce in the vast majority an ignorant bliss, a blind stupor, which makes this diabolical shithole of a planet acceptable, something to be grateful for.

I have adapted a song for the human race, based on Thank You Very Much by The Scaffold:

Thank you very much for the first world war.
Thank you very much.
Thank you very, very, very much.

Thank you very much for the second world war.
Thank you very, very, very much.

Thank you very much for 9/11
Thank you very much.
Thank you very, very, very much.

Thank you very much for the Zionist wars.
Thank you very much,
Thank you very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very much.

Thank you very much for the extreme poverty
Thank you very much.
Thank you very, very, very much.

Thank you very much for the cutthroat Jihadi.
Thank you very, very, very much.

You can add you're own verses. There won't be a shortage of verses. There is lots to be thankful for!!

WRONG

I've had that growing feeling all day again that something has gone wrong, that something has occured that wasn't supposed to, or something hasn't happened that should have, or both. I started to get this feeling last summer, but it really got me late last year.

Something is wrong.

WASHINGTON POST CONTINUES TO BLEAT FOR WAR ON SYRIA

Following the Geneva II talks, and the lack of significant progress towards a peaceful resolution, The Washington Post, as it did all last summer, is calling for war on Syria.

The president claims that the United States could not positively influence the situation in Syria unless it launched an Iraq-style invasion. Mr. Assad demonstrated that this is untrue in his response to Mr. Obama’s threat of targeted airstrikes last summer — a quick agreement to hand over chemical arms. A similar show of U.S. willingness to use limited force could, at the least, compel Mr. Assad to fulfill that deal. But it could also be wielded to put an end to the unconscionable crimes against humanity the regime is committing in full view of the world — from blockades that have caused the starvation of children to the mass execution of prisoners and use of “barrel bombs,” Scud missiles and other indiscriminate weapons on apartment buildings, hospitals and schools.

...With or without U.N. action, it is time for the Obama administration to reconsider how it can check the regime’s crimes and the growing threat of al-Qaeda. As Mr. Kerry reportedly conceded, for now it has no answers.

[source : The U.S. must reconsider its failed Syrian policy, Editorial, The Washington Post, http://wapo.st/1bXncSS, 4th February 2014]

Contrary to the claims of this editorial, it is the rebels who are starving civilians and children and using them as human shields, it is the rebels who are mass executing anyone who does not agree with their views, and after 2 months of such claims there has still not been any photographic evidence of one single barrel bomb being dropped on Aleppo, but a clue was provided as to what might be going on in Aleppo when it was revealed that there is a dispute between factions of the rebels who are blowing each other up! So regarding Aleppo, there are claims that Syria is dropping barrel bombs on civilians but no photographic evidence of a barrel bomb being dropped...AFTER 2 MONTHS, but we are now reading that there is a fight between factions of the rebels who are blowing each other up. You do the maths.

But the new meme I see is that Syria is now Afghanistan 2.0.

I see all the same rhetoric on Syria as there was on Afghanistan: a hotbed for extremists; a launchpad for attacks on the homeland, etc, etc.

But as always, The Washington Post and the rest of the NATO media deliberately fail to mention that we created the Islamic terrorists of all types, nurtured them through a Covenant of Security, agreed that Saudi Arabia would unleash the nastiest, most medieval, cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria, gave them cover through the fake Arab Spring, assisted the Jihadis on the ground in Libya, and then smuggled them into Syria, as stated by Roland Dumas, with Saudi Arabia providing the finance.

In other words, we create problems to impose our solutions.

ROLAND DUMAS

Here is what Roland Dumas said about:
1. Great Britain planning to smuggle Jihadis into Syria TWO YEARS before the fake Arab Spring kicked off in Syria;
2. Israel destroying neighbours that it does not get along with.

In an interview with the French TV station LCP, former French minister for Foreign Affairs Roland Dumas said:

‘’ I’m going to tell you something. I was in England two years before the violence in Syria on other business. I met with top British officials, who confessed to me that they were preparing something in Syria.

This was in Britain not in America. Britain was organizing an invasion of rebels into Syria. They even asked me, although I was no longer minister for foreign affairs, if I would like to participate.

Naturally, I refused, I said I’m French, that doesn’t interest me.’’

Dumas went on give the audience a quick lesson on the real reason for the war that has now claimed the lives of tens of thousands of people.

‘’This operation goes way back. It was prepared, preconceived and planned… in the region it is important to know that this Syrian regime has a very anti-Israeli stance.

Consequently, everything that moves in the region- and I have this from the former Israeli prime minister who told me ‘we’ll try to get on with our neighbours but those who don’t agree with us will be destroyed.

It’s a type of politics, a view of history, why not after all. But one should know about it.’’

Dumas is a retired French foreign minister who is obliged to use discretion when revealing secrets which could affect French foreign policy. That is why he made the statement ‘I am French, that doesn’t interest me’. He could not reveal France’s role in the British plan as he would be exposing himself to prosecution for revealing state secrets.

[source : Gearóid Ó Colmáin – Former French Foreign Minister: The War Against Syria Was Planned Two Years Before “The Arab Spring” – 18 June 2013, Friends of Syria, http://friendsofsyria.co/2014/02/04/gearoid-o-colmain-former-french-foreign-minister-the-war-against-syria-was-planned-two-years-before-the-arab-spring-18-june-2013/, Accessed 4th February 2014]

The original source then proposes that it is all a Jewish plot.

If so then why are there so many Arab countries supporting the rebels, in Libya and Syria? Qatar. Saudi Arabia. Jordan. UAE. Each are playing their part, big or small.

The Jews are merely Hofjuden of the British monarchy.

Always in the background is the insidious secret British state, the "dark forces", that really runs things. The Zionist hierarchy works for them and has sold out the Jewish people. World War 1 was engineered not by the Jews but by a British Imperialist cabal around Cecil Rhodes and Lord Milner. Lord Rothschild was just on the perimeter of this cabal, willing and able to assist with finances and to use the Jews for British Imperial policies.

But I will agree that Israel is the driving force behind 9/11 and the subsequent wars, but on the orders of the "dark forces" of the insidious secret British state.

PRESIDENT OBAMA MUST CONTROL BONESMAN KERRY OR THINGS COULD GET VERY WILD VERY QUICKLY

Under #SkullAndBones #Kerry US #ForeignPolicy is based on #AlQaeda terrorists & #cannibals in #Syria, #NeoNazis & #Antisemites in #Ukraine

— WebsterGTarpley (@WebsterGTarpley) February 3, 2014

THE HYPOCRISY OF USA AND ITS ALLIES OVER ATTACK ON RUSSIA OVER HOMOSEXUAL LAWS

An opinion in The Washington Post on Friday highlighted the hypocrisy of attacking Russia through Russia's homosexual laws.

Eight U.S. states, and several cities and counties, have some version of what we call “no promo homo” provisions. Before the United States condemns the Russian statute’s infringement of free speech and academic freedom, it should recognize that our own republican forms of government have repeatedly given rise to analogous restrictions.

It is no coincidence that these examples focus on what must and must not be said to children. An explanatory note accompanying the 2013 Russian legislation makes clear that the statute seeks to protect children “from the factors that negatively affect their physical, intellectual, mental, spiritual, and moral development.” Proponents of the U.S. statutes have offered similar justification. And, like Russian President Vladimir Putin this month, the U.S. laws warn gay people and sympathizers to “leave kids alone, please.”

[source : Ian Ayres and William Eskridge, The U.S. hypocrisy over Russia’s anti-gay laws, Washington Post, http://wapo.st/1hZY5mM, 31st January 2014]

SYRIAN REBELS USE PALESTINIAN REFUGEES AS HUMAN SHIELDS

Is this what we are supporting in Syria?

Rebels using Palestinian refugees as human shields?

But why are there Palestinian refugees in the first place? Because the Zionists have terrorised them off their farms, out of their houses, away from the Occupied Territories. They fled to Syria because Syria opposes the Zionist entity.

This is why there is now a Ziojihad against Syria, as the Israeli-Saudi Axis of Evil executes an illegal war using cutthroat Jihadis who have been led to believe they are fighting for Allah when they are in fact fighting for Israel.

THE OBSERVER CONTINUES THE ATTACK ON RUSSIA WITH A CURIOUS QUOTE

The Editorial in The Observer today continues the attack on Russia with a curious quote:

All human beings are born equal in dignity and rights.

[source : Homophobia: defy Putin with a same-sex kiss at Sochi, Editorial, The Observer, http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/feb/01/homophobia-putin-sex-kiss-sochi-olympics-russia-gay-rights, 2nd February 2014]

This looked familiar to me, and so it should be, because it is based on Article 1 of The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the document on which The United Nations is allegedly based. However, as I have extensively shown on this blog, The United Nations:
1. was formed to defeat Hitlerism, yet Hitler was deliberately created and allowed to become a threat to the world, with the acquiesence and assistance from The City of London and Wall Street;
2. was built with Rockefeller money, even though the Rockefellers were key financiers of and collaborators with Hitler and the Nazis;
3. was the result of a second engineered world war, the first engineered world war failing to produce a world government that had any power because the USA did not join, but after the engineered second world war in which the USA suffered many many more casualties the USA not only joined but also hosts the world government, the UN.

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights Article 1 actually states:

All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.

So, one wonders where the reference to "free" went?

Does The Observer not think that we should be free?

But back to the editorial.

International pressure is being applied to Putin, and Russia in general, to acquiesce and surrender to NATO. The illegal attack on Syria is being opposed and resisted by only a handful of nations, but the most prominent and powerful of these is Russia. When Medvedev acquiesced to the war on Libya, The City of London loved him, so much so that articles and editorials were published in the Financial Times ordering Putin to either not run for the Presidency again, or if he did then he should be more like Medvedev. But Putin ran for the Presidency, won and has been Putin. The backing of Russia has given President Assad the confidence and strength to stand up to the covert invasion of Syria by cutthroat Jihadis sponsored by Saudi Arabia with support from the USA, Israel and Great Britain. This resistance forced them to run the largest false flag since 9/11 in August last year at Ghouta, which was designed to provoke worldwide condemnation of Assad and an overt large scale military intervention to support the rebels. But it failed. Russia, and others, saw through it and the plan failed. Russia had earlier exposed the rebels using chemical weapons at Khan al Assal, a proof that forced the rebels into massacring every living thing at Khan al Assal so there was nobody left alive to testify to UN investigators. As a consequence, Prince Bandar bin Sultan bombed Volgograd over the New Year, making good on the threat that he made to Putin last summer. Putin has vowed to hunt Bandar down, forcing Bandar to go into hiding in the USA.

Hence, Putin is even more of a demon than our leaders first thought, so any international pressure that can be forced onto Putin is welcome.

The events in Ukraine are part of their revenge.

And the gay NATO agenda has also been selected as a psyop against Putin and Russia.

I exposed the gay NATO agenda on Tuesday in PUTTING THE GAY NATO AGENDA INTO PERSPECTIVE at http://thetruthserumblog.blogspot.co.uk/2014/01/putting-gay-nato-agenda-into- perspective.html. There is an agenda for population control. The global elite strongly believe that there are too many of us living on 'their' planet. The UN Global Biodiversity Assessment begins to suggest a huge population reduction programme, which has prompted the introduction of BPA and fertility reduction GM into our food chain. But for this warmongering Satanic demented global elite, the 'benefit' of homosexual sex is that we can't have children from homosexual sex. And any children must therefore be bred in laboratories where DNA can be amended or added to produce the workers of tomorrow with the desired characteristics.

But Putin and Russia do not agree with this depopulation agenda. Russia is suffering a decline in population, and Putin is encouraging an increase in population.

And what exactly do the Russian homosexuality laws say that is causing so much fury in the West? That the propagation of "non-traditional sexual relations" to children is banned.

According to the editorial:

He points out that 85% of the Russian public support the law, as does the highly influential Russian Orthodox church.

So the Russian people support the Russian homosexuality laws.

But what The Guardian/Observer and all the other NATO media organisations attacking Putin and Russia seem to forget (and cover up) is that this Disunited Fascist Queendom is cursed, plagued and infected with Satanism and Paedophilia, and there is no better (or worse?) example of this than Jimmy Savile, who was best buddies with those right at the very top of society. Now, following the revelations of Ed Snowden and all the spying and surveillance etc, do you think that it is at all feasible that his activities were not known about, following all the rumours and allegations and investigations?

NO F WAY!!

They must have known about Savile. Just like they know what you got for Christmas.

All the investigations into elite paedophile rings in this DFQ are being shut down, and covered up. The global elite hate children. They think that children are only good for one thing, and that is for abuse and sacrifice at one of their elite Satanic ceremonies! Hence, they are prepared to unleash cutthroat Jihadis onto defenceless Syrian children.

AND PUTIN OPPOSES THIS!!

Is it just a coincidence that all these 'celebrities', some of whom have sold their souls, applying pressure to Putin and Russia over Russia's homosexual laws are not saying anything about the cover ups of elite paedophile rings or about the covert invasion of Syria by cutthroat Jihadis? What do they really know? Only what the next pay cheque tells them?

Our media is controlled. It has an agenda. Ask yourself, why is our media launching an attack on Putin using homosexuality and citing human rights while not saying anything about the truth of the wars since the inside job 9/11, including the abuse of the human rights of Syrian children who are defenceless against cutthroat Jihadis financed by Saudi Arabia, smuggled in by Great Britain and encouraged to go there by preachers such as Michael Adebalajo, who was allowed to preach Jihad on the streets of London under the noses of MI5?

Well, this is the Satanic Paedophile Disunited Fascist Queendom with its capital city, Londonistan.

It's not gud 'ere, is it?

Not good at all.

DOZHD

I had never heard of this Russian media channel before, Dozhd, but it has been taken off air, apparently due to a question it asked its audience about the siege of Leningrad during WW2.

But who/what is Dozhd?

From my brief investigation:
1. Dozhd encouraged the White Revolution in Russia in 2011, sympathising by showing the white ribbon that supporters of the White Revolution wore. So what was The White Revolution? It was, of course, the US State Department interfering in Russian politics, sponsoring Alexei Navalny, who continues to appear on Dozhd despite his bona fide Wall Street credentials being exposed.
2. As with the White Revolution, Dozhd is also at the least sympathising with the Euromaidan in Ukraine, which as we know is the USA/EU/Israel/Saudi Arabia repaying Putin for blocking war on Syria. It's funny how EU leaders detest nationalism when it comes their precious Bilderberg EU, but it's fine when it comes to weakening Russia.
3. The owner of Dozhd, Natalya Sindeyeva, co-wrote an article on Dozhd and its support for Navalny for OpenDemocracy with the founding editor of OpenDemocracy. OpenDemocracy stinks to high heaven of Soros, Rockefeller and Ford.

From this brief investigation it looks like Dozhd is a NATO media operation of some kind. I cannot find out who Natalya Sindeyeva is or where she got the money to build this large media operation, and in her interview on OpenDemocracy she avoids stating the source of her finance, despite her discussing the financial problems that were identified.

I WONDER HOW MANY JIHADIS MICHAEL ADEBLAJO INSPIRED TO JOIN THE ZIOJIHAD AGAINST SYRIA

The killer of Lee Rigby, Michael Adebalajo, was under surveillance by MI5, and was being harassed by them to become an agent for them. But while this harassment by MI5 was going on, Adebalajo was on the streets of London preaching Jihad against Syria, pleading with young Muslims to join the Jihad against President Bashar al Assad, and he was even considering going there himself.

However, the Jihad in Syria is actually a Ziojihad, for Israel, not Allah.

Syria was named as one of seven nations to be attacked in five years following the inside Ziojob 9/11 in 2001. The seven nations were: Iraq, Iran, Syria and Lebanon, and Libya, Sudan and Somalia. The first 4 of these were named in a Zionist warmongering document called A Clean Break, while Iraq and Iran were named as the principal targets for war in yet another warmongering document, this one entitled Rebuilding America's Defenses, which was written by yet another Zionist organisation, The Project for a New American Century. But by 2007 only 2 of the 7 had been attacked: Iraq and Lebanon. So it was agreed between the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia that the latter would unleash cutthroat Jihadis onto some of those seven nations. The first was Libya, where British Special Forces assisted the Jihadis on the ground from the start, and NAT provided air cover. The second is Syria. Former French foreign minister Roland Dumas was asked by the British to help them to smuggle the Jihadis into Syria, which he refused. Dumas also stated his belief that the war in Syria is actually a war by Israel on Syria, Dumas claiming to have been told by an unnamed Israeli PM that Israel would destroy all nations that did not get on with Israel. Syria does not get on with Israel.

So it is fair to say that the Jihad in Syria is a Ziojihad, and that Adebalajo was allowed to preach Jihad on the streets of London to encourage weak-minded Muslims to fight in Syria because this satisfied the illegal British foreign policy of ousting President Bashar al Assad.

But this is only half the story!

In the first public speech that, as the new head of MI5, Andrew Parker gave, Parker expressed his concern about British Jihadis returning from Syria:

Referring to the ongoing conflict in Syria, he said a growing proportion of MI5's casework concerned individuals from the UK who had travelled to fight there.

He said extremist Sunni groups in Syria were aspiring to attack Western countries.

This has long been a concern of Western governments - that British-based jihadists will one day return from the killing fields of Syria and turn their new-found skills on the population back home.

[source : MI5 chief Andrew Parker warns of Islamist threat to UK, BBC, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-24454596, 9th October 2013]

And in November last year, the three stooges, the heads of MI5, MI6 and GCHQ, sat in front of a cabal of MPs and somehow managed to keep their faces straight as they bemoaned the revelations of Ed Snowden (which had been published on the front page of the Rothschild/NATO media asset The Guardian) and defended their intrusive spying because of...THE THREAT FROM AL QAEDA AND BRITISH JIHADIS FIGHTING IN SYRIA!

Yet we created al Qaeda, allowed it to grow in a Covenant of Security, and allowed its leader to live openly in London!

Here is what Andrew Parker said to the Intelligence and Security Committee on 7th November 2013:

ANDREW PARKER: Absolutely, Chairman. So the threat since that time [7th Juy 2005] has then started to spread out. I want to be clear, this diversification of threat is not a shift or a displacement from one area to another. It is the growth of the Al-Qaeda phenomenon in the areas that you are referring to; so North and West Africa, in East Africa, in Yemen, and most recently in Syria, where the Al-Qaeda ideology has started to take root with pre-existing groups there that were mostly national or regional Islamist extremist groupings, and we have seen threats from all of those areas, but also still from South Asia.

...LORD LOTHIAN: In answer to Sir Menzies you were talking about terrorist tourism. Is it your assessment that that is a growing threat or a decreasing one?
ANDREW PARKER: It has grown recently and is growing at the moment because of Syria. Syria has become a very attractive place for people to go for that reason. Those who support or sympathise with the Al-Qaeda ideological message that I mentioned. We have seen low hundreds now of people from this country go to Syria for periods and come back, some large numbers still there, and get involved in fighting. This is partly because of the proximity of Syria and the ease of travel there, but also because it is attractive as what they would see as a Jihadi cause.

So, mugged off people of this Disunited Fascist Queendom, MI5 allow extremist Islamic preachers to preach Ziojihad on the streets of London to encourage weak-minded young Muslims to fight alongside al Qaeda in Syria, because it satisfies one particular current aim of British foreign policy which is to illegally remove President Bashar al Assad of Syria, only for the head of MI5 to sit in front of a cabal of MPs and somehow keep his face straight as he and the other two stooges defend their outrageous spying operations because of al Qaeda and the possible influence they may have in turning British recruits in the Jihad against Syria into terrorists for al Qaeda attacking the homeland!

YOU COULD NOT MAKE THIS STUFF UP!!

So how many British Jihadis are now in Syria?

Well, the BBC seemed to focus on Francois Hollande's affair during his visit to this Disunited Fascist Queendom yesterday. But Hollande warned that the number of British Jihadis currently in Syria could be as many as 700:

AS MANY as 700 Britons are fighting with Al Qaeda linked extremists in war torn Syria, France’s President Francois Hollande warned today.

He said a similar number from France had also travelled there, making the issue one of the most serious facing his country and the UK.

The two countries have agreed closer cross-Channel co-operation to keep track of potential jihadists.

Intelligence services and counter-terrorism experts worry that home grown fighters will return from Syria radicalised and ready to use violence as a means of achieving their goals.

The figure of 700 Britons in Syria is almost double the most recent expert estimate.

The issue - which has become a key focus for the security and intelligence services - was among topics discussed in talks between Mr Hollande and Prime Minister David Cameron in Oxfordshire today.

[source : New TERROR time bomb: French president reveals 700 British 'jihadists' in Syrian holy war, The Daily Express, http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/457207/New-TERROR-time-bomb-French-president-reveals-700-British-jihadists-in-Syrian-holy-war, 31st January 2014]

Parker told the ISC in November the number was in the low hundreds.

It is now in the high hundreds.

SEVEN HUNDRED.

APPROXIMATELY TWICE AS MANY AS FIRST THOUGHT.

I wonder how many are there because of Michael Adebalajo, and all the other extremist preachers allowed to preach Ziojihad against Syria because it assists British foreign policy.

And when these Ziojihadists return to this DFQ they will then assist British domestic policy by becoming a terrorist threat, so GCHQ will need to know every little thing that you do because you might be supporting them, guilty until proven innocent.

Well, after all, this is the Disunited Fascist Queendom with its capital city, Londonistan.

It's gud 'ere, innit?

WHY HAS THE GUARDIAN ONLY NOW RELEASED FOOTAGE OF THE EDITORIAL TEAM ALLEGEDLY DESTROYING THEIR COMPUTERS?

The Guardian has released footage of the editorial team destroying their computers under the supervision of GCHQ.

But why now?

The computers were destroyed last July.

Why has this footage not been on the front page of The Guardian? To show to us just how cruel and dastardly GCHQ are?

The reporter with this 'breaking' news is Luke Harding. Harding hates Russia, and the feeling is mututal, for Harding was kicked out of Russia for his anti-Russia Anti-Putin 'journalism'.

There is a clue in the report:

The bizarre episode in the basement of the Guardian's London HQ was the climax of Downing Street's fraught interactions with the Guardian in the wake of Snowden's leak – the biggest in the history of western intelligence. The details are revealed in a new book – The Snowden Files: The Inside Story of the World's Most Wanted Man – by the Guardian correspondent Luke Harding. The book, published next week, describes how the Guardian took the decision to destroy its own Macbooks after the government explicitly threatened the paper with an injunction.

[source : Footage released of Guardian editors destroying Snowden hard drives, The Guardian, http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/jan/31/footage-released-guardian-editors-snowden-hard-drives-gchq, 31st January 2014]

The Guardian blatantly took sides with Mikhail Khordokovsky, backing him, pushing his case as political, even publishing an editorial under his name, while Khordokovsky was where he belonged, in jail for ripping off the Russian people. Khordokovsky is a Rothschild asset. Khordokovsky had a deal with Lord Jacob Rothschild that Khordokovsky's shares in Yukos would go to Rothschild, and when Khordokovsky launched the Open Russia Foundation he did so at Somerset House in London, which is owned by the Rothschilds, and with himself, Henry Kissinger and Lord Jacob Rothschild on the board of trustees.

So from this we can guess that The Guardian is also an asset of the Rothschilds.

But when we also add into the mix my analysis of the editorials of The Guardian/Observer in THE GUARDIAN AND ITS ROLE IN ACCUSING ASSAD AND PUSHING FOR WAR ON SYRIA from 18th December 2013, then we begin to see a definite pro-establishment pro-Zionist position in the editorials of The Guardian.

And this is the newspaper that brought us Ed Snowden!

And now this very belated release of footage of the editorial team smashing their computers up which gives the impression that The Guardian is so anti-Establishment. But The Guardian is anything but!

As Dr Webster Tarpley says; you don't get to be on the front page unless the establishment wants you to know something.

So why would the establishment want you to know you were being spied on?

One analysis, and one with which I concur, is that the Snowden revelations began less than a week after there was a very significant turning point in the violence in Syria (NB I do not call it a civil war), when the Syrian Arab Army recaptured al Qusair, which was a massive logistics hub for the rebels. Things have been going down hill very quickly for the rebels since then. But before then President Obama had been under huge pressure to attack Syria, being implicated in a series of minor scandals, but he wisely refused. There were also several allegations that Assad had crossed Obama's now infamous 'red line' and had used chemical weapons, for example at Khan al Assal, but as usual it was shown that it was the rebels who used them. The Snowden revelations may have had some effect. Shortly after they began Obama changed his mind and decided that Assad had crossed Obama's red line. But still no war.

So Prince Bandar organised the false flag of Ghouta.

But there is another analysis that is equally as valid. Previous NSA whistleblowers had been ignored, such as Russell Tice and Wayne Madsen. But somehow, Snowden got the front page.

Why?

One of the less-remembered parts of the Osama bin Laden fairytale was that the NSA had a hard time keeping track of his communications with his Al CIAda operatives. Why? Because, as General Michael Hayden told CBS News back in early 2001, bin Laden used standard encryption and off-the-shelf American telecommunication products.

Sound unbelievable? That’s because it is. As they go on to admit in that very same report, they were tracking bin Laden’s satellite phone after all, and as James Bamford and others have described in exhaustive detail, the NSA was monitoring Al Qaeda’s “communications hub” in Yemen for years prior to 9/11, and purposefullly withholding most of that information from the CIA bin Laden unit. But the idea that the NSA just wasn’t able to track bin Laden because of his dastardly technology was a key meme for the NSA to implant in the immediate wake of 9/11. That’s why the Hayden interview was replayed on CBS less than 48 hours after the attacks, and that’s why, as recently declassified documents show, the NSA used 9/11 as an official talking point to justify their illegal surveillance of Americans.

This meme, of course, was a lie. As NSA insiders have pointed out for years, most if not all of the current illegal collections programs began before 9/11, but the false flag events of September 11th provided the perfect justification for the revelation and expansion of those programs.

[source : The NSA Fiasco: A Carefully Choreographed Stage Show, CRG, http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-nsa-fiasco-a-carefully-choreographed-stage-show/5365992, 27th January 2014]

And it is that last quoted paragraph that needs to be read again and again.

All that Snowden's revelations have done is:
1. informed us that we are being spied on every nanosecond of the day, so get used to it (and most of the brain dead public have);
2. it is all dodgy but nobody is being prosecuted;
3. we are being told that despite all this dodgy spying the spying agencies need much, much more surveillance powers because of 'al Qaeda'.

Yet, on point 3, we created al Qaeda, gave them sanctuary in London through the Covenant of Security, and allowed preachers like Michael Adebalajo to preach Jihad against Syria (Adebalajo then butchered Lee Rigby).

It's all a sad, sad farce.

It's gud 'ere, innit?