As readers will know, last December I analysed the editorials of The Guardian regarding Syria, concluding that The Guardian/Observer:
1. immediately and consistently accused Assad and the Syrian military of the horrific events at Ghouta on 21st August, not once considering the rebels as culprits, despite:
(a) an abundance of evidence that the rebels possessed chemical weapons, had tested them on live rabbits and had issued threats on video of using chemical weapons, ,
(b) the sponsor of all the cutthroat cannibalism, Prince Bandar bin Sultan of the Diabolical Medieval Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, had issued a series of threats to Vladimir Putin just the month before that he was about to unleash hell on earth in Syria and Lebanon,
(c) following the recapture of al Qusair by the Syrian Arab Army the rebels were facing annihilation and desperately needed overt large scale military assistance on their behalf;
(d) doing so would have provided the perfect casus belli for war on Syria, crossing Obama's 'red line';
2. was overjoyed at Syria relinquishing its stockpile of chemical weapons but not once mentioned Israel's much larger, more powerful and more devastating stockpile of not just chemical but biological and nuclear weapons;
3. supported war on Syria, but only under R2P.
And that kind of editorial continues today, which mentions the following countries in a negative light, Syria, Russia and Iran, placing all the responsibility for the mayhem in Syria on them, while, as usual, not once mentioning everybody's favourite Zionist entity, Israel, or everybody's favourite diabolical medieval kingdom, Saudi Arabia, as the instigators of not just the violence and bloodshed in Syria, but also that in Iraq, Lebanon and Libya.
NOT ONCE!!
All the violence and bloodshed in the Middle East and North Africa can be traced back to 9/11, in which Zionist agents were in charge of the response by the USA, military and political, to that murdered September day, and Saudi Arabia supplied the patsies (but all with the nod and a wink from the DFQ).
The plan for all the wars since then is on YouTube!!
General Wesley Clark reveals how it was leaked to him by someone in The Pentagon!!
IT'S ALL THERE!!
ON YOUTUBE!!!!!!!!!!
And when you include The Redirection by Seymour Hersh then you have got yourself one hell of a front page story.
But what does The Guardian print on its front page instead; Ed Snowden's 'revelations' that we are all being spied on.
But we knew this by the late 1990's!!
The editorial in question is entitled Syria: save the civilians, and is at http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/feb/12/syria-aid-civilians-negotiations
The civilians of Syria could be saved by Saudi Arabia calling off its cutthroats.
But do we hear that? NO! Instead we get that it's all Russia fault. Hence the attacks on Putin via homosexuality and snowflakes.
PATHETIC!!
In contrast, Seamus Milne has written a very considered piece on Great Britain's attitude to war, and the possible growing division between us, the ordinary muggins Great British public who send our sons and daughters, brothers and sisters into war, and our politicians on the grave issue of war.
That's likely to prove harder than before. Each war attracts less support than the last. Britain has a chance to turn its back on centuries of warmaking, shake off the mentality of junior global policeman and start to build a different relationship with the rest of the world.
[source : Seamus Milne, A 'pause' in centuries of British wars is not enough, The Guardian, http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/feb/12/pause-centuries-british-wars-elite-panicking, 13th February 2014]
Amen to that!!
No comments:
Post a Comment