THE UNHERO ED SNOWDEN

I was very disappointed this morning to read a tweet by one of the journalists I consider to be one of, if not the, finest journalists that this sad and uninformed Disunited Fascist Queendom has, Tony Gosling, which called Ed Snowden a hero.

The #Snowden 'Black Propaganda' Files: How @Guardian's @lukeharding1968 turned another hero into a villain @RT_com http://t.co/bDFPwr3K2v

— Tony Gosling (@TonyGosling) February 8, 2014

The tweet links to Tony's latest Op-Edge in Russia Today about Snowden.

Since he first hit the front page of The Guardian last June, Ed Snowden has been, and sadly still is being, held up as a hero of our times for telling us that we are all being spied on. But a significant minority already knew this following the revealing and official confirmation of the Echelon program in the late 1990s...15 YEARS AGO!!

Now, if 15 years ago our emails and phone calls were being intercepted and listened into then there is no doubt that they still are, and that that program would be logically expanded to include every type of electronic communication. I would be very surprised if all the new means of electronic communication had not been OK'd by the likes of the NSA and GCHQ before they were released. The ideal mode of communication, for the spies that is, is one which leads the users to believe that they are not being spied on, that their mode of communication is super super secure, for then the users will chat freely and openly about anything and everything. So is it possible that some means of communication have been developed by the NSA, released as if super super secure, the NSA then pretends it can't crack it, so only those who require total secrecy use it?

But back to Snowden and my huge doubts about his 'revelations'.

Snowden came to fame through The Guardian.

On 28th December 2010 The Guardian published an editorial entitled Mikhail Khodorkovsky: Russia's Political Prisoner, which was 'signed' by Mikhail Khodorkovsky, to imply that Khordokovsky had written the editorial himself. But Khordokovsky was not a 'political prisoner'. He was doing bird for a long list of crimes against the people of Russia, primarily financial fraud. Khordokovsky was, and presumably still is following the joy in NATO countries at his early release, an agent of the Rothschilds. He had a deal that Yukos would be handed to Lord Jacob Rothschild, and he had created The Open Russia Foundation in 2001 which was launched in Somerset House, which is owned by The Rothschilds, and on the board sat himself, Lord Jacob Rothschild and Henry Kissinger. So immediately we can see a very, very strong link between the Rothschilds and The Guardian. Khordokovsky was one of a handful of Russian 'entrepreneurs', mostly Jewish, who economically raped Russia under the pisshead Yeltsin. Most fled to either London or Tel Aviv shortly after Putin laid down the law to them. Khordokovsky stayed. Berezovsky was another member of this gang, but he fled to London. Berezovsky was given virtually all one show of BBC Question Time in 2007 to verbally attack Putin and Russia. The Guardian also assisted by giving Berezovsky, on several occasions, the opportunity to do the same in their newspaper. But Berezovsky is now dead, after writing to Putin that he wanted to return to Russia (I wonder what tales Berezovsky could have told Putin?).

But to add to this Guardian-Rothschild link, last December I posted THE GUARDIAN AND ITS ROLE IN ACCUSING ASSAD AND PUSHING FOR WAR ON SYRIA, in which I analysed the editorials of The Guardian and its sister The Observer following the horrific events at Ghouta on 21st August last year.

Here is brief on the situation in Syria at that time:
1. The Syrian rebels of all kinds are being financed by the Diabolical Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, due to an agreement reached between the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia that the latter would unleash cutthroat Jihadis onto nations like Syria, Iran and Lebanon because a plan for war on seven nations, one of which was Syria, revealed to General Wesley Clark shortly 9/11 was seriously behind schedule;
2. Because this plan was behind schedule the Wall Street/Bilderberg/Israel faction wanted pro-fascist pro-war pro-Israel Mitt Romney in The White House, and gave 10 times as much money to Romney than they did to Obama, which indicates that they want war...big time. But they got Nobel Peace Prize Winner Obama instead, who is reluctant to engage in any overt large scale military conflict;
3. Obama was immediately embroiled in a series of minor scandals, all designed to pressure him into attacking Syria, which were reinforced by personal visits from warmongers like Cameron and Erdogan, and lies that Assad had used CWs, thus crossing Obama's 'red line';
3. After the recapture of al Qusair by the Syrian Arab Army, the writing was on the wall for Bandar's rebels. So Bandar went to see Putin and issued a threat: if Russia would abandon Syria then Saudi Arabia would buy billions of dollars of Russian weapons and allow Russia to operate in the Middle East; if not, then Bandar would unleash Jihadi terrorists onto the Winter Olympics, and also unleash hell on earth in Syria and Lebanon. Putin rejected this heartwarming, lovely threat. So far, we can see that Bandar does not renege on his threats;
4. So by August Bandar's cutthroat cannibals were facing total annihilation, which was compounded by news that many a Syrian rebel was realising that they had been taken for fools and they were abandoning the 'rebellion', which was in fact a covert operation by Israel to weaken Israel's enemies;
5. Following the use of CWs at Khan al Assal, Russia investigated the event and provided evidence to the UN that the rebels, not Assad, had used CWs there. Syria agreed to allow the UN into Syria to investigate Khan al Assal itself. Within days of this agreement being announced the rebels went back into Khan al Assal and slaughtered every living thing, including soldiers of the Syrian Arab Army, so that nobody was left alive to give evidence to the UN. UN weapons inspectors were in Damascus on 21st August;
6. A year earlier Obama had issued his 'red line' warning on the use of CWs in Syria, leading to many false claims that Assad had used CWs;
7. Former French foreign minister Roland Dumas stated that he was asked by Great Britain in 2009, TWO YEARS BEFORE THE FAKE ARAB SPRING ERUPTED IN SYRIA, to help them smuggle Jihadis into Syria. He also stated his belief that the war on Syria is due to Israel.

So any use of CWs by Assad would have been suicidal, and would have provided the perfect casus belli for NATO to bomb Syria to smithereens. On the other hand, Bandar's rebels faced total annihilation and needed overt large scale military intervention on their behalf. Israel had already tried this two times earlier last year when it claimed to have attacked a warehouse storing, and a convoy carrying, weapons en route from Iran to Hezbollah, when in fact Israel attacked several HQs of the Syrian Arab Army in synchronicity with the rebels who attacked several checkpoints of the SAA in Damascus.

The conclusion from the analysis of the editorials was:
1. The Guardian/Observer immediately and consistently accused Assad of the horrific events at Ghouta on 21st August, despite an abundance of evidence that the rebels had chemical weapons (CWs), had tested them on live rabbits and had issued threats on video of using CWs to get what they wanted;
2. The Guardian/Observer supported war on Syria, but only under R2P (to save the civilians from Bandar's cutthroats who had been smuggled into Syria by Great Britain).
3. The Guardian/Observer supported Syria relinquishing its CWs but not once mentioned that Israel has a much larger, more horrific arsenal of not just CWs but also biological and even nuclear weapons, and nor did the editorials suggest that these should be destroyed.

Israel is a creation of the Rothschilds, their plaything.

Another very suspicious event linked to Snowden is that Sister Agnes Mariam investigated the events of Ghouta and concluded that it was a false flag attack, designed to pin the blame on Assad and provoke a war on Syria. She was to speak at the Stop The War conference last November. But one very surprising opponent of her findings and of her proposed appearance at that conference was NATO media darling Jeremy Scahill, who had recently released his documentary Dirty Wars on the killer drone program. Scahill very surprisingly and very bizarrely launched his own very personal but very public dirty war against Sister Agnes Mariam to get her banned from the Stop The War conference last November, a dirty war which he won. After this very bizarre behaviour of Scahill, who is Scahill teaming up with? Glenn Greenwald...who brought us Ed Snowden, and who now has millions and millions of dollars for a new media venture (after only releasing 1% of Snowden's very, very, very important and devastating revelations after 8 months).

So we have to ask:
1. why would The Guardian, with this highly suspicious link to the Rothschilds, supporting Rothschild agent Mikhail Khordokovsky and Rothschild plaything Israel while supporting war on Israel's enemies and not telling the truth about 9/11 and the subsequent wars, allow the revelations of Ed Snowden to be front page news, not just once, but for a whole summer? And when previous whistleblowers had been ignored?
2. if the Snowden revelations are that important and devastating then why have we only seen 1% of them?
3. why has nobody been prosecuted?
4. why are the proposed changes to the spying only legalising what they do now and not banning it?

It all looks highly suspicious to me.

All that Snowden has done is produced a climate in which we have accepted the spying. I mean, why are there no protests? Why are there no agents provocateur causing occupations and riots in the streets about the spying when we see occupations and riots in Ukraine?

And the vast majority have accepted the spying because of 'al Qaeda', sold to us as a collection of cold-blooded terrorists wishing to destroy our way of life. But we created al Qaeda. We nurtured them through a Covenant of Security, which allowed preachers like Michael Adebalajo to preach Jihad against Syria, thus providing more terrorists for Great Britain to smuggle into Syria, and provide more target practice for the Syrian Arab Army.

And Snowden's claims divert attention from the more insidious spying capabilities of electronic remote mind reading and writing.