A decade or so ago the implantable microchip was rarely heard of and in its infancy.
A week or so ago in a reply to Ian Blair I suggested that the tremendous media coverage of the disappearance of Holly Wells and Jessica Chapman was to scare parents into microchipping their children.
A few days ago I posted a report that several employees of a US company were to be compulsory microchipped.
Over the last few years the implantable microchip has been quietly but steadily introduced into society. Recently Bar Soba in Glasgow introduced a scheme of implantable microchips for its customers. This follows a similar PR stunt in Barcelona, Spain. Articles appear in the press, even the BBC, to sell the implantable microchip. It can store medical records, financially-related records, help track you children etc. These sound like useful applications.
But why the push to chip us like cattle?
Because the people who run the planet think we are just that, CATTLE!
Besides this latest report from America of the compulsory implantable microchip I think every time a chip has been implanted into a human it has been on a voluntary basis. The only way that compulsory microchipping will occur is if there is a horrible war that traumatises us and the government is led to believe that it needs to know where we are every second of every day. This desire is already evident due to the tracking of our car journeys. Identity cards were issued in the UK during WW2, and they continued after WW2 until one man Mr Clarence Willcock said they were a nuisance. Without Willcock they may well have continued, and been re-issued with each advance in technology.
The new batch of ID cards will hold a chip (which is why the current batch of credit cards has one, so we get used to the idea of a microchip about our person and for practical use and identification). The establishment of a national identity register is also just another step towards our every move and thought being recorded.
It may sound useful for an implantable microchip to hold some personal data. But I don't want one inside of me. I know the people who are pushing for it and what they have done.
The reasons given for the introduction of the ID card are terrorism and fraud.
Terrorism is being incited and allowed to happen by the Anglo-American intelligence apparatus.
Fraud? The biggest fraud foisted upon mankind is the system of banking we have called fractional reserve banking that allows banks to create paper/electronic money and lend it out. The bankers have abused this system to finance world wars in order to get a world government. I also understand that the amount of fraud due to fake ID, rather than misrepresentation of circumstances, is not that great.
I predict with great confidence that ID cards will not be the panacea they are touted as, and that when things go wrong with the ID card the implantable microchip will be suggested as the best solution.
No comments:
Post a Comment