WHY WAS MY COMMENT TO RICHARD PERLE NOT POSTED?

Richard 'Prince of Darkness' Perle was allowed to rant in The Sunday Telegraph yesterday. The rant was called "We should not tolerate the preachers of jihad". My comment, posted on the morning of Sunday 13th August, also the date of publication, read thus;

Richard

your signature appears on a number of letters and articles published by the Project for a New American Century (PNAC). In fact only 8 days after 9/11 you and many others signed a letter addressed to George W Bush (NB I did not call him 'President') in which PNAC called for action against bin Laden, Iraq and an increase in support for Israel. It also asked for action against Hezbollah as a way to get to Syria and Iran, even though this was only 8 days after 9/11 and no evidence had been provided which implicated Hezbollah, Syria or Iran. Since then the FBI has basically stopped looking for bin Laden over 9/11 due to a lack of evidence. However, the USA/UK has gone into and destroyed Iraq, increased their support for Israel and has recently engaged in support for Israel's completely disproportionate attack on Lebanon, even sending Israel via the UK missiles composed of DU. Since this recent murderous adventure into Lebanon by Israel your friends at PNAC and related organizations have been screaming and ranting for war with Iran and Syria, writing articles accusing Iran and Syria as the instigators of the current war in Lebanon, and suggesting that war with Iran is inevitable. It would appear to me that your call for action against Hezbollah as a way to get to Iran and Syria is, like the other suggestions in the letter, going to happen. This is uncanny because PNAC also produced a document called “Rebuilding America’s Defenses” which called for the USA to fight multiple simultaneous wars across the globe, which would also require a massive injection of finance into the US military. It was recognized that an event such as “a new Pearl Harbor” would be required for both, so the citizens of the USA would acquiesce. Fortunately for PNAC, but unfortunately for approximately 3000 others, there occurred “a new Pearl Harbor” on 11th September 2001. It seems that somebody is granting their wish and making PNAC’s ‘dreams’ come true!

Among the comments are a few which do not address the subject of Perle's rant, which I also do not do. But what I am trying to address is Perle's motive. He and his fellow 'evildoers' have an agenda, an agenda that reaks of death. This current war on terror started on 9/11. 9/11 was exactly the 'new Pearl Harbor' that Perle and his fellow 'evildoers' were looking for in order to create the support from the citizens of the USA for multiple simultaneous wars across the globe and a massive injection of finance into the US military.

Needless to say, the official report into 9/11 is a complete farce and is ripped to shreds by David Ray Griffin and Nafeez Ahmed, thereby raising the terrifying possibility that 9/11 was covered-up in order to protect the masterminds and their accomplices, whoever they may be...(mentioning no names, Cheney)