The Russian state owned media organisation Russia Today is showing concern over the true aim of the Arab Spring.
This morning on RT in the UK the first ten minutes or so of the hourly bulletin was about the results of revolutions in Libya and Egypt.
The BBC has hardly addressed the over 20 deaths in Cairo last night which occured when Egyptian security ploughed into Christian protestors in Tahrir Square. Coptic Christians were protesting against attacks on their churches by Muslims when they were themselves attacked by radical Muslims. Violence between the two sides erupted and Egyptian security drove in with armed vehicles, mowing down protestors. Following the removal of Mubarak the Muslim Brotherhood is widely expected to gain power in Egypt in the coming elections. The MB even has its own TV station! The attack on the Israeli embassy in Cairo a few weeks ago is a sign of things to come.
RT reports from Libya always show the Libyan rebels, who are now referred to as loyal to the NTC in NATO media, shouting Allah U Akbar and shooting guns into buildings or into the air.
Yesterday RT interviewed an adviser to President Assad of Syria. She said that the fraction of the Syrian population who are protesting is small and that the Muslim Brotherhood is playing a large role in the uprising[1]. She also referred to outside influences supplying arms to the protestors. RT has recently showed what appeared to be armed protestors in Syria openly carrying automatic machine guns. But when NATO media claims a woman was murdered by Syrian state security and that photos of her badly mutilated body were too gruesome to show on TV and for that woman to then step forward and say that she was alive and well, who should you believe?
Earlier this year articles by CFR member and ex-MB member in The FT[2] and by analysts from the Rand Corporation in The Washington Post[3] portrayed the MB as cute, cuddly mild and reformed Muslims who wouldn't hurt a fly. Yet you can easily find statements from senior members of the MB in which they state that war on Israel is their aim[4][5].
The MB is MI6/CIA.
The Rand Corporation want world war 3 (which is what state on my website is the true purpose of the creation of Israel).
So if radical Islam in the shape of the MB comes to power in Egypt and Syria, what next?
For decades there has been relative peace in the Middle East. It could have easily kicked off between Israel and its neighbours as Israel abused the Balfour Declaration and Palestinians, but people like Mubarak and Assad have held back. Gaddafi was cooperating with the UK and USA in the Global War on Terror with involvement in rendition and torture and by supplying intelligence to MI6 and CIA on suspected al Qaeda in Libya.
Yet two of these are now gone and NATO wants the third ousted.
And for what?
To be replaced by radical Islamists?
It is more than curious that leaders like this are being replaced by radical Islamic political organisations whose publicly stated aim is war with Israel.
And only RT is showing some concern about this.
[1] ‘We’re building our own Arab democracy’ – Syrian presidential aide, http://rt.com/news/syria-terrorists-democracy-shaaban-405/
[2] Egypt can bring in the Brotherhood, FT, 2/2/2011
[3] Five Myths about the Muslim Brotherhood, http://www.rand.org/commentary/2011/03/06/WP.html
[4] Muslim Brotherhood: 'Prepare Egyptians for War With Israel',http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/Muslim-Brotherhood-war-Israel/2011/02/01/id/384603
[5] Muslim Brotherhood Calls for War on Israel, http://www.charismamag.com/index.php/news-old/30381-muslim-brotherhood-calls-for-war-on-israel
No comments:
Post a Comment