JIHADI HAGUE CLAIMS ON EU ARMS ARE BOGUS AND A BETRAYAL

Jihadi William Hague claimed that the EU arms embargo on arms to the Syrian rebels should be lifted to bring Assad to the negotiating table.

BUT ASSAD HAS ALREADY AGREED TO COME TO THE TABLE!

It is the rebels who are refusing to come to the table.

So using Jihadi Hague's logic the EU should actually be arming Assad!

And what if the rebels NEVER come to the negotiating table? Eh? What about that possibility? Or should that now be probability? Why should the rebels come to the negotiating table now, now that they will get tanks and heavy artillery and God knows what else?

Lavrov is beginning to show some scepticism that the peace talks will go ahead.

The Russian foreign minister has said it is a ‘very tall order’ to organize the forthcoming international conference in Geneva on the situation in Syria.

Sergei Lavrov said after a meeting with US Secretary of State John Kerry in the French capital, Paris, on Monday that it would not be easy to organize the Geneva talks on Syria.

Lavrov and Kerry discussed the possible dates and participants in the peace talks in the meeting, which was their sixth since the US secretary of state took office in February.

“We discussed how we can proceed… in our efforts to make this conference happen. It’s not an easy task. It’s a very tall order,” the Russian foreign minister stated.

[source : Organizing Geneva conference on Syria tall order: Russian FM, Press TV, http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/05/28/305814/organizing-syria-talks-tall-order-russia/, 28th May 2013]

The EU will be betrayed by Britain and France. They even tried during the debate alleging Assad used chemical weapons yesterday. They have no intention of bringing Assad to the negotiating table. They want Assad out. Jihadi Hague has made that absolutely crystal clear. But Assad will not go. Syria does not want him to go either. So the only way to get Assad out is to kick him out. And Jihadi Hague can't use British troops so proxies must be used, as is occuring now and has been occuring for the last two years.

And just how much of a union is the EU on this?

By contrast, the Austrian vice-chancellor and foreign minister, Michael Spindelegger, said the talks "have failed … I'm a little annoyed … It's regrettable that we have found no common position."

He added that France joined Britain in demanding a lifting of the arms embargo, but that the other 25 were opposed.

[source : UK forces EU to lift embargo on Syria rebel arms, The Guardian, http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/may/28/uk-forced-eu-embargo-syria-rebel-arms, 28th May 2013]

25 out of 27 opposed the lifting of the embargo.

25 out of 27!

There is no union on this. Britain and France torpedoed the embargo.

Peace in Syria could be easily reached if Saudi Arabia and Qatar withdrew their support for the al Qaeda rebels, and NATO withdrew its support. But none of these has any intention of doing so. The sad war in Syria is due to Israel. Israel, with Saudi Arabia and Zionist factions in the USA, did the inside Ziojob 9/11 to implement a plan for war on seven nations in five years that was revealed to General Wesley Clark, but by 2007 that plan was moribund so a Plan B was implemented involving Jihadis being unleashed onto Libya and Syria.