THE WOOLWICH HOAX IS NO HOAX

There is a sad and desperate attempt by some to show that the horrific event on Wednesday in Woolwich, in which a serving British soldier was hacked to death, was hoax.

There is evidence of photo manipulation going down and (deliberate?) misinterpreting of locations.

To prove my point first watch the video of The Sun available at http://order-order.com/2013/05/22/watch-itv-footage-of-terrorist-attack-aftermath/ .


At the beginning of the video, the first 20 seconds or so, which was captured by somebody on a bus (and not the famous footage that the butcher asked to record) you can clearly see blood on the pavement next to the sign. The butcher actually walks through it! If you watch in full screen you can see the blood on the kerb. This could be a footprint from the butcher's shoes or could be evidence that the slain soldier was dragged from the large blood patch in to the road, as was first reported. But the blood is there. Ain't no doubt about that.

Now look at this series of photos taken from http://www.chrisspivey.co.uk/?p=12020



It is better to go to the page itself but there is one particular photo that is above a caption that says "people gone no blood on pavement. fella still on his knees" which has two red ellipses, one supposed to show there is no blood where The Sun video above clearly shows there is (and it looks (clumsily) edited), and another that is alleged to show a man kneeling down, but is actually a rucksack as seen in The Sun video above.

Which is easier to photoshop: images from a murder in a street, or a long form birth certificate?

Why would anyone want to make the murder look like a hoax?

Or are they targeting one individual in particular to make him or her look a complete idiot?