Tuesday, January 28, 2014

PUTTING THE GAY NATO AGENDA INTO PERSPECTIVE

I think Vladimir Putin must be quaking in his boots!!

Ellie Goulding has now confirmed that she will not, repeat not, sing at the opening ceremony of the Sochi Winter Olympics.

So, why has Goulding taken this earth-shattering decision?

She is protesting at Russia's laws on homosexuality.

Please note that Goulding is not, repeat not, thanking Putin for supporting President Bashar al Assad as Syria fights a not-so-covert invasion of al Qaeda, who are sponsored by our glorious allies, the Diabolical Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, and smuggled in by this Disunited Fascist Queendom.

Nor is she protesting at Saudi Arabia or Israel or this DFQ for executing this barbaric illegal war on Syria.

Why? Because she hasn't got a clue what is really going on!

Goulding joins a sad and long list of household celebrities who are happy to apply international pressure on Putin to acquiesce to the demands of NATO, one such celebrity being Stephen Fry, who wrote to David Cameron last year demanding that the winter olympics be moved to somewhere else other than Russia because of Russia's homosexuality laws. And like Goulding, Fry, and the rest, is saying sweet FA about our barbaric illegal war on Syria.

But is there a gay NATO agenda? And what do I mean by a gay agenda?

By a gay agenda I mean that we are being encouraged into homosexuality. I can't put a precise date on when this agenda began to manifest on our TV screens but it would be difficult to argue against the statement that homosexuality is appearing more frequently on our TVs in our living rooms. Sex in general is, like that talentless twerking idiot Miley Cyrus simulating sex in front of adoring young fans last year at the MTV Awards.

So, we have to ask why is there much more homosexuality on our TV screens while everyday the news presenters and documentary makers do not tell us the truth about world wars and what the real agenda behind the events in Syria are.

My argument would be that there has to be a pro-homosexual agenda.

The vast majority of the human race need and want to have sex. But one of the consequences of sex is children. And children grow up to become adults, who consume resources: food; cars; houses; clothes, etc.

One of the most disturbing books I have ever read is the very long United Nations Global Biodiversity Assessment, which makes some very disturbing suggestions, the most disturbing of which is the suggestion that there should be a maximum of one billion human beings on the planet, and those one billion should live a very meagre existence. Other statements and suggestions the ruling elite and their supporters have made make it very clear that they think we are a cancer on the planet. Perhaps the most famous quote of our ruling elite is from our very own Prince Philip who said that he would like to be reincarnated as a deadly virus to reduce human population!

This is how our ruling elite think. To them we are cannon fodder to be blown up in times of world war that they engineer, and a cancer on the planet in times of peace. They would kill us all if they could, but then they would have to do some real work themselves, so they need some of us left alive to dig gold out of mines, and make stuff in factories, and farm.

So one way of reducing population is to encourage us all into homosexuality. This is a slow method, but it also satisfies the "anything goes" mentality of Satanism. And when our leaders attend mock human sacrifices at Bohemian Grove in a ceremony called The Cremation of Care, and engineer world wars and holocausts, and have investigations into elite paedophile rings closed down and covered up, then we can safely say that our ruling elite are indeed Satanists. Other methods of population control are gender-bending chemicals such as BPA. And vaccines. And abortion.

I will now refer you to the talk given by Dr Richard Day in 1969, most, if not all, of which he prophecised has come true, and who also used that phrase, "anything goes". See http://www.overlordsofchaos.com/html/new_order_of_barbarians.html for what Day proposed: abortion; drink and drugs; education. It is all there. Day says there will be a pro-homosexual agenda.

And this gay agenda is only being pushed in NATO countries and countries allied to NATO such as Australia, which is part of the (no, don't laugh) 'Commonwealth'.

So, let's put this gay NATO agenda into perspective.

Ellie Goulding thinks she can pressure or embarrass Putin over Russia's homosexual laws by refusing to sing at the opening ceremony of the Sochi Winter Olympics.

Meanwhile, Putin is after the blood of Prince Bandar bin Sultan after Bandar made good on the threat that he, Bandar, issued to Putin last summer by bombing Volgograd.

And for the likes of Goulding and Fry and all the ignorant rest who haven't got, or don't want to have, a clue and rely on their beloved BBC for all their 'news', the threat that Prince Bandar made was this: dump Assad and Saudi Arabia would allow Russia to operate in the Middle East, and also buy billions of dollars of Russian weapons; if not then Bandar would unleash hell in Syria and Lebanon, and also unleash terrorist Jihadis onto the Sochi Winter Olympics.

Putin refused this lovely offer.

As a consequence Bandar has sent al Qaeda into Lebanon to take out Hezbollah.

He also ran the false flag attack at Ghouta.

And over the New Year he ran the bombings in Volgograd.

Bandar is now in hiding in the USA. He calls it 'sick leave', but he is really shitting his pants hiding.

So, Ellie, and Stephen, and all the rest, I think Putin has other things on his mind other than relaxing homosexual laws that advance a gay NATO agenda...like trying to catch one of the planet's most dangerous criminals.

I also understand that Putin is trying to increase the population of Russia. This goes against everything that the genocidal Anglo-American Establishment want. They want death, destruction, terror, war, misery.

You should read that UN GBA. They want a maximum of 1 billion people on this planet. A half billion people for them to have any kind of living standard.





No comments: