DESTROYING CAREERS

Am I the only person in this Disunited Fascist Queendom who is pushing the FACT that it was the British monarchy through its network of Freemasonry who engineered World War One?

Take this little speech by John Rees that was tweeted on Stop The War.

@JohnWRees at #WW1 Great Debate on lessons of war for today @STWuk http://t.co/WzlHLECl1r

— Dan Poulton (@heedlines) April 3, 2014

Rees appears to be arguing that the war was going to happen anyway because it was all about competing empires, but at the same time appears to be suggesting that WW2 was a consequence of WW1, and that the roots of WW1 were sewn much earlier than June 1914. Unfortunately, in this short clip Rees does not elaborate on his argument, and I would be very interested to find out what he said, because as I understand it he is not far wrong.

Except on one very crucial point.

Rees' statement that the war was going to happen anyway is wrong, and absolves the aforementioned culprits of any blame for the mass ritual slaughter that we call World War 1.

My first question is: is world government the ultimate empire?

The answer is, of course it is...but only if you control it!

The USA, Germany and Russia were cooperating, not building empires. These three were implementing The American System of Economics and rapidly developing through trade routes via land-based trains beyond the reach of the British Navy. The British Empire was the greatest at that time but could not fight all 3 on its own. So it got them to fight each other. This was engineered through The Balkan Committee (see How the British Crown created the Balkan powderkeg by Joseph Brewda), the British Freemasonic network killed Arch Duke Ferdinand, and Sir Edward Grey and King George V tricked Germany into invading Belgium. Kaiser Wilhelm later wrote that he was told by a distinguished Freemason that Freemasonry engineered the war to create a power vacuum in Central Europe.

What replaced The Austro-Hungarian Empire? The League of Nations.

Who suggested The League of Nations? The first mention I can find is from none other than Sir Edward Grey, who got his fellow conspirator Colonel Edward Mandel House, who was the top adviser to KKK supporter President Woodrow Wilson, to propose The League of Nations in a speech he wrote for Wilson.

And because World War 1 did not produce the world government that the British Empire wanted, because the rebellious USA voted out of The League of Nations, the Anglophile nest of Wall Street agents created both Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia in preparation for World War 2.

After WW2 The League of Nations was replaced by the European Union, while the world government moved to New York and is now called The United Nations.

The rest, as they say, is history.

Or is it?

I cannot read any of this anywhere, not even on any anti-war site.

So, why are the anti-war movement and historians such as Professor Niall Ferguson ignoring this slam dunk evidence that the British monarchy through its network of Freemasonry engineered World War 1 and World War 2 to create a world government as the ultimate form of empire?

Would acknowledging this destroy a lot of careers?