Is an article about sex with General Wesley Clark the only way that Clark's (genuine) revelations of totaler krieg stand any kind of chance of being published in The Guardian?
The only references I can find on the website of The Guardian to Clark and his revelations are in comments from readers, not from any reporter.
But yesterday, on the 70th anniversary of the D-Day landings, a day with some poignancy, did we see Clark and his revelations in The Guardian? Er, no.
Instead we get these two articles on...sex!! And not just any old sex but sex with robots.
From teledildonics to interactive porn: the future of sex in a digital age
My year of video game sex
These two articles also reinforce the predictions of Dr Richard Day, that sex would be encouraged, 'anything goes' he said.
And by anything that obviously now means robots.
Which begs the question : are 'they' thinking of ways to create human-robot hybrids in an artificial womb after man-robot sexual intercourse? Are they really that sick? Probably not, but it wouldn't surprise me. The idea is to encourage us to allow our body to dictate the mind and be consumed with sex rather than concerns of standard of living but without the possible increase in births, hence the drive to make LGBT mainstream. 'They' hate people. 'They' want most of us dead. And when population has been reduced to the 1 to 2 billion 'they' want then 'they' don't want whoever survives breeding like rabbits to increase population again.
So here is The Guardian doing its bit for the agenda...again!!
No comments:
Post a Comment