WOULD YOU TRUST THESE PEOPLE?

The DSB are set to release their report into MH17 tomorrow. They should only provide their view on what happened to MH17, not the culprits (though they have possibly illegally been dropping hints on their view in the media). Perhaps surprisingly for a case this huge, although journalists will be present at the press conference when the DSB will reveal their results, the journalists present will not be allowed to ask any questions whatsoever!

But the DSB is based in The Netherlands. The Netherlands was one of the founding members of NATO. At the NATO summit in April 2008 NATO stated that Ukraine would at some point become a member of NATO. Thus the Netherlands has a motive in implicating Russia for downing MH17.

But it gets much worse.

The intelligence services of NATO are suspiciously quiet about MH17, and all seem to rely for all their evidence on one tiny organisation which was originally founded by an unemployed office clerk who, for whatever reason, had an interest in weapons in Syria. This organisation is Belling Cat created by Eliot Higgins. You would think that if someone was interested in weapons in Syria then that someone would be interested in why there was a conflict in Syria in the first place. We know that Higgins links to this blog occasionally, but not to tell his readers the source of the conflict in Syria. The conflict in Syria is just one seven that was planned by the USA and others. There is evidence that its seeds were planted in 1991, when Paul Woltowitz told General Wesley Clark that the USA had 5 to 10 years to take out "those old Soviet client regimes: Syria, Iraq, Iran". Shortly after the attacks of 9/11 General Wesley Clark was told that the 9/11 attacks were to be used for war and regime change in seven countries in five years: Iraq, Iran, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Sudan and Somalia. Since 9/11 we have seen wars in Iraq (2003), Lebanon (2006), Libya (2011) and Syria (2011 - to present). This plan was kapput by 2007 so since then the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia agreed that the latter would unleash the nastiest cutthroat Jihadis on the planet onto Syria, Lebanon and Iran.

Isn't this a remarkable coincidence?

So remarkable in fact that not one NATO media outlet has referred to it!!

Now why wouldn't the NATO media want you to know that? They want you to know all sorts of useless, boring shit, but not that our foreign policy for the last 14 years has been to implement this plan revealed to Clark in October 2001, which is an extension of a plan formulated in 1996 and revealed in a document called A Clean Break, which is an extension of the aforementioned statement that Wolfowitz made to Clark in 1991.

So with MH17 we have:
1. the Netherlands has a motive - NATO is effectively controlling the investigation in to the downing of a plane, which is expected to be claimed to be due to a BUK missile, yet Ukraine, the nation that wants to join NATO and NATO wants as a member, has BUKs and they were operating in East Ukraine when MH17 came down;
2. NATO intelligence services have been unable to deliver evidence for their claim that Russia shot down MH17 and for all their intelligence rely on a former office clerk in Leicester, who has been seduced by NATO warmongers like Carl Bildt on junkets on the NATO gravy train while keeping his mouth shut on the true reason for all the wars in North Africa and the Middle East.

So I ask you: would you trust these people?