YO! PUTIN! PLEASE DON'T BOMB CUTTHROAT JIHADIS! BE NICE TO THEM INSTEAD!

I think if we write a nice letter to these cheeky chappies, kindly asking them to stop sawing people's heads off or we won't send them any Christmas hugs this year, then they might actually listen:

"moderate syrian rebels" butchering everyone they can lay their hands on ......dear russia...give em hell pic.twitter.com/77R645SoYY

— barry hamill (@baz2000) October 3, 2015

Listen to the words of that nice pro-abortionist Lindsey German who supports this being done to defenceless children:


The above was satire, just in case you hadn't worked it out.

The facts are these:
1. the international cutthroat Jihadis were unleashed onto Syria in the first place through an agreement reached in 2007 between the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia. The UK was in on this plot by 2009 at the latest;
2. these Jihadis were supposed to oust or kill Assad, as they had done to Gaddafi in Libya;
3. but by July 2013 they had not done so, so their sponsor Prince Bandar of Saudi Arabia, went to Moscow to threaten Putin: either Putin dumps Assad; or Bandar unleashes hell in Syria;
4. Putin rejected this offer, so on 21st August 2013 Bandar unleashed hell to provoke a war on Syria;
5. but that false flag failed to provoke the overt war on Syria, similar to that on Libya in 2011;
6. without NATO air support the cutthroat Jihadis in Syria have not been able to do their job for their sponsors, the NATO/Zionist/Gulf states;
7. so a plan proposed by the US DIA in 2012, to facilitate the rise of a Salafist entity to isolate Assad, has been implemented;
8. this entity we know as Islamic State, which has been supplied by NATO air drops and convoys through Turkey, and NATO intelligence services have been encouraging and allowing Jihadis to join the Jihad against Assad;
9. the birth of Islamic State in Syria has allowed the NATO/Zionist/Gulf states to bomb Syria and nurture the growth of IS in Syria such that it is now considered to be a threat to the existence of the planet due to allegations that it has nuclear weapons components, which in turn means that Assad could not reject any proposal from anyone to bomb IS for fear of being labelled as harbouring terrorists;
10. this also means that the NATO/Zionist/Gulf states have been illegally bombing Syria, without an invitation from Assad or UN mandate;
11. but Russia has been invited and is bombing Islamic State legally.

The NATO/Zionist/Gulf states should not have been allowed to bomb Islamic State. They should be booted out of Syria. They started the wars in the Middle East and North Africa and have brought nothing but Islamic State barbarity. They cannot be trusted to destroy Islamic State. After a year of NATO/Zionist/Gulf states bombing IS has actually grown in strength and power and influence, i.e. their 'war' on Islamic State has been a sham.

And if Assad goes, as the NATO/Zionist/Gulf states have demanded, then they will have won, they having first committed 9/11 to instigate the series of wars we have seen in North Africa and the Middle East since then.

Assad must stay in power or the real terrorists win.

And if they win then they will do similar acts again and again and again, and on a larger scale.

And if you think Islamic State are righteous dudes then why not send your kids off to Raqqa for a nice holiday?

The danger is that IS will be overtly assisted by the NATO/Zionist/Gulf states to drag Putin into an Afghanistan-esque disaster, but with McCain playing the role of Wilson, and Putin ousted in a coup, but I doubt it. I think there is too much international support for Russia's intervention.