15 YEARS LATER

9/11 allowed a project to be implemented. That project was for the USA and its allies to start multiple wars across the globe. Afghanistan was first, but only because bin Laden had stayed there.

The main target after 9/11 was Iraq. Iraq was named in two documents written by the same group of people, who on 9/11 were in very influential positions. The two documents were A Clean Break, and Rebuilding America's Defenses.

A Clean Break also names Lebanon and Syria, and indirectly Iran.

Rebuilding America's Defenses names Iran as more of a threat than Iraq.

Oopsadaisy!

========================================
From http://www.larouchepac.com/node/20421

15 Years Later, `A Clean Break' Is Still the Policy
November 21, 2011 • 10:07AM

Fifteen years ago, a gang of U.S. neocons, led by Richard Perle, Doug Feith, and David Wurmser presented incoming Israeli Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu with a strategy paper called ``A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm.'' In addition to calling for the overthrow of Saddam Hussein, the plan focussed on Syria and the need to also destabilize and overthrow the Assad regime there. Here is a relevant quote from that report, which bears remarkable similarity to events now playing out on the ground. ``Israel can shape its strategic environment, in cooperation with Turkey and Jordan, by weakening, containing and even rolling back Syria. This effort can focus on removing Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq--an important Israeli strategic objective in its own right--as a means of foiling Syria's regional ambitions... It is understandable that Israel has an interest in supporting diplomatically, militarily and operationally Turkey's and Jordan's actions against Syria, such as securing tribal alliances with Arab tribes that cross into Syrian territory and are hostile to the Syrian ruling elite.'' Elsewhere the document called for ``striking Syrian military targets in Lebanon, and should that prove insufficient, striking at select targets in Syria proper.'' And ``given the nature of the regime in Damascus, it is both natural and moral that Israel abandon the slogan `comprehensive peace' and move to contain Syria, drawing attention to its weapons of mass destruction program, and rejecting `land for peace' deals on the Golan Heights.''