COVER UP OF BRITISH GOVERNMENT DRIVE FOR WAR ON IRAN CONTINUES

Craig Murray is doing a very good job of trying to get to the bottom of the scandal surrounding Adam Werritty, Liam Fox and Matthew Gould. His Freedom of Information requests regarding Gould have been denied because, he was told almost immediately and very late at night, it would cost too much!

In his latest blog about this FoI denial Murray quotes statements from the House of Commons Public Administration Committee questioning of Sir Gus O'Donnell. Paul Flynn MP appears to be concerned about the cover up, and asks O'Donnell a few incisive questions, but is continually interrupted by another MP called Robert Halfon. The reason for this is given by Murray.

It is shocking but true that Robert Halfon MP, who disrupted Flynn with repeated points of order, receives funding from precisely the same Israeli sources as Werritty, and in particular from Mr Poju Zabludowicz. He also formerly had a full time paid job as Political Director of the Conservative Friends of Israel.

...It is now proven without doubt that O’Donnell lied blatantly about the number of Gould-Fox-Werritty meetings, and that Mossad was involved. And yet every single British mainstream media outlet still refuses to mention it.

I know from a mole that the plot involves a plan to attack Iran. For the cover-up to be so blatant and yet so comprehensively maintained, the secret at the heart of this conspiracy must be great, and those complicit must include a very large swathe of the British political and media establishment.

UPDATE: access to this blog is now blocked from FCO and Cabinet Office terminals. Very wise – truth can be contagious.

[source : Gould-Werritty: A Real Conspiracy, Not a Theory, http://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2011/11/gould-werritty-a-real-conspiracy-not-a-theory/ ]

This drive for war on Iran is consistent with the theory that since 1996 a Zionist faction has been lusting for war on its neighbours. The warmongering document A Clean Break was written in 1996 for none other than Nuclear Netanyahu, and named Iraq, Iran, Lebanon and Syria as the threats that should be addressed "to secure the realm".

But we must also note that the group containing the authors of A Clean Break later wrote Rebuilding America's Defenses in 2000 as The Project for a New American Century (PNAC), the so-called Neocons, and named Iraq and Iran as the major threats to American security, along with North Korea. That document recognised the need for a "new Pearl Harbor" to convince the American public to go to war. 9/11 gave the Neocons that "new Pearl Harbor", and they have not wasted the opportunity, have they?

On 9/11 members of PNAC were in very influential positions. Both Vice President Dick Cheney and Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, founding members of PNAC, were in Washington DC on 9/11 while President George Bush was in Florida, and so they were effectively in charge. Just a few months before 9/11 the power to stand down the USAF was quietly transferred from the Pentagon and officers in the field to only the Secretary of Defense, ie PNAC founder Donald Rumsfeld.

But it goes much deeper than this.

Even before the WTC had collapsed there was a demand for proof that Iraq was behind the attacks of 9/11. Osama bin Marfan Laden was accused, rightly or wrongly, and a token invasion of a defenceless Afghanistan was made. But the real target was Iraq, named in both A Clean Break and Rebuilding America's Defenses. One reason given for going after Iraq was WMD. But who had previously negotiated a sale of WMD to Iraq? Donald Rumsfeld. And who sold North Korea nuclear technology while on the board of ABB? Donald Rumsfeld.

So Donald Rumsfeld was a founding member of a pro-Israeli organisation which had written a document recognising the need for "a new Pearl Harbor" to go to war on threats to Israel, and on 9/11, when the United States Air Force was mysteriously AWOL, Rumsfeld was Secretary of Defense with the sole power to issue a Stand Down order, and after 9/11 one of those threats to Israel, Iraq, was attacked because it had WMD which Rumsfeld sold to them. Iraq was invaded in 2003 and the USA is building its biggest ever embassy there. Coincidentally, Iraq has the 2nd largest proven reserves of oil.

Yes, this does stink a bit, doesn't it.

But there's more.

In February 2005 Rafik Hariri was assassinated in Beirut, Lebanon. Syria was initially accused and The Cedar Revolution, another of the CIA color revolutions, drove Syrian troops out of Lebanon. The Special Tribunal for Lebanon (STL) was created and has been accused of being a tool of the USA and Israel. The STL tried to prove Syria was responsible for Hariri's assassination but couldn't, and has since totally discredited itself now claiming that Hezbollah did it, a claim that has yet to be proven. Hezbollah has responded by showing intercepted communications from Israeli aircraft flying over Lebanon showing that Israel was at the time following Hariri's movements very closely. Israel was at war on Lebanon and its innocent children in a contrived war in 2006.

So that's Iraq and Lebanon taken care of.

In 2004 the list containing Iraq, Iran, Syria and Lebanon was amended to include Libya, Somalia and Sudan as the Greater Middle East Project, extending from North Africa to Pakistan. Libya was recently bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed by NATO, and there have been less high profile wars in Sudan and Somalia.

Now back to this war drive on Iran. Iran and Syria have publicly vowed to defend each other. If one is attacked the other will rain their missiles onto Israel. So starting a war on Syria will drag in Iran.

But it will also drag in Russia.

But is there much more to this drive for war on Iran from elements within the British political establishment?

As I point out on my website, the British establishment does "have form" when it comes to engineering world wars.

Germany was tricked into starting World War 1 by Great Britain. The assassination of Archduke Ferdinand was a Freemason plot run out of London. King George then told Kaiser Wilhelm that Britain would not join in a war on the Continent, but as soon as Germany invaded Belgium the BEF was sent into Northern France to stop Germany's advance to Paris. Wilhelm later wrote in his memoirs that a high ranking German Freemason told him that Freemasonry had engineered the war to destroy and then recreate Central Europe. The first attempt at world government was subsequently made as The League of Nations (LoN). The LoN failed because the USA voted out despite Woodrow Wilson touring the USA and almost killing himself in the process in a desperate attempt to convince America to join the LoN. Wilson had earlier created the abomination we know as The Federal Reserve.

The USA voted out of the LoN because although it had sent troops to France they only fought for less than a year and suffered few casualties. To convince the USA a world government was required the USA had to be embroiled in a much longer and bloodier war. So Hitler was brought forth by elements of Wall Street allied to the British ruling class. These same elements using the power given to them by The Federal Reserve also created the USSR to oppose Hitler. Hitler served two purposes. The first was to start another war on the European mainland and beyond to drag in the USA. The second was to scare Jews to Palestine, which he did eventually. Despite being apparent enemies FDR conspired with Churchill to get the USA involved in WW2. The Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor was provoked and allowed to happen, and the USA then fought for nearly four years all over the world. Unsurprisingly, a world government of sorts The United Nations was created after WW2 and its HQ is in the USA. The UN has some global power but not absolute dictatorial global power. Not yet, anyway.

After WW2 the Holocaust convinced a sceptical world Jewry that creating Eretz Israel in Palestine was the only way to save Judaism, so they brutally drove the Palestinians off their land into the largest refugee camps in the world, Gaza and The West Bank. This and subsequent Zionist behaviour has provoked many Arabs and Muslims into terrorism, which has been nurtured and guided by the CIA and MI6, particularly in London, also known as Londonistan.

All this follows the diabolical plan for three world wars to create a tyrannical world government proposed by Freemasonic sicko Albert Pike in 1871.

9/11 was the trigger for the final world war to be between Zionism and Islam, with the the rest of the world being dragged in having been divided by the issue of Palestine for decades. The USA is now in a confident war mood, following recent success in Iraq and Libya, and is now threatening Syria and Iran and also Pakistan. Syria is backed by Russia. Pakistan is backed by China.

Senator Mike Gravel recently suggested a sequence of events if Iran or Syria is attacked, and I would agree with them; Syria or Iran is attacked. Both with Hezbollah and Hamas lob missiles at Israel. Israel eventually defends itself with nukes. Pakistan nukes Israel. Russia and China on one side and the USA and its allies on the other will not stand on the side lines. Maybe the UK will use its nukes.

We do have to ask, why is there such a drive for war on Iran inside the British political establishment with these possible consequences when it has the aforementioned track record of engineering world wars?

And not just ask, but be very very concerned.

As Murray concedes,

the secret at the heart of this conspiracy must be great

There can be no greater conspiracy than to create a tyrannical world government.

I doubt that people such as Werritty or Gould are fully aware and/or complicit. As Foreign Secretary William Hague could be. He is Bilderberg which voted for war on Iran last year and must have frequent contact with Gould.

But we cannot ignore this or recent statements from British agents Henry Kissinger and George Soros.

Speaking on Bloomberg earlier this year Kissinger said that events in Egypt were "only the first Scene of the first act of a drama that is to be played out.". A few months later he demanded war on Iran for Israel. Soros vowed that the Iranian government would be removed in the "bloodiest of the revolutions". Soros has a history of funding colour revolutions.

So at the very least, war on Iran would be the culmination of a series of wars stemming from the 1996 Israeli document A Clean Break.

But I fear much more.

I may be wrong. But I am trying to fit current affairs into a grander scheme that explains not just very recent history since 1996, but modern history, accounting for the previous world wars and the drive to create that all-powerful tyrannical world government which would implement policies to drastically reduce human population down to about one billion, probably less.

What I see stands out like a black cockroach on a white rug.

If we fall for this one then we probably deserve everything they want.