Sunday, June 09, 2019

ON U S INTELS AND SOCIAL MEDIA

Infowars made a fortune from 9/11 and so-called Islamic terror. They called out 9/11 as an inside job blaming Israel and Saudi Arabia. They also accused the FBI of running Islamic terror, allowing terror plots to grow, or even starting the plots, supplying explosives etc, to then arrest the suspects in the nick of time.

But that all changed in 2015/6 when the extreme rightist Zionist globalist fixer Roger Stone began to appear on Infowars to promote Trump to the Infowars demographic.

Now Infowars barely mention 9/11, Israel, Saudi Arabia, and now blame everything on leftists, muslims and immigrants.

Last year Alex Jones confessed that Infowars is an asset of U S Military Intelligence. He also claimed that Trump is also an asset of U S Military Intelligence. This claim was backed up by Jerome Corsi. Jones also claimed that many others in the alt-media are part of the same U S Military Intelligence network.

Alex's family have a history of brutality. His family founded the extremely racist Republic of Texas. They then fought at the rank of colonel and general in the Confederate Army to defend negro slavery. And his late uncle Biff ran death squads in Guatemala for the CIA/Pentagon.

So it is fair to say that Infowars is the crown jewel in social media for the CIA/Pentagon.

Operation Mockingbird is their programme to control meda. ALL media. From the left, to the right, and everything in between.

So if the CIA/Pentagon control all the media, then why are they going after their own assets? Particularly when these assets like Infowars now promote the goals of the CIA/Pentagon?

It's called generating interest, then sympathy, then allegiance.

For why else would the PTB go after the likes of their assets if they weren't telling the truth?

This is the reason for the article in the NYT.

Most if not all the alt-media characters mentioned are pro-Israel and in the case of Paul Joseph Watson sold out on 9/11.

But note: no article in the MSM ever, ever, ever mentions that U S Military Intelligence has a network in social media and that Infowars is a major member of that network. And that Watson's latest media venture, Bummit News is also a part of that network (that did 9/11 and runs paedophile networks).

Why would the CIA/Pentagon in early 2017 try to silence TTS, WSWS, etc without any cries of protest from Infowars, but they now soft censor the likes of their assets Infowars to give them the reason that they are being censored for their rightism?

Do you honestly think that U S Military Intelligence and the CIA are trying to destroy their assets like Infowars?

Or are U S Military Intelligence and the CIA trying to generate interest and then sympathy for their pro-war, Islamophobic rhetoric that would serve well in a war on Iran?

No comments: